DOCSLIB.ORG

Using MRI to Digitize, Database, and Document the Morphological Diversity of Fish

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Using MRI to Digitize, Database, and Document the Morphological Diversity of Fish The Digital Fish Library: Using MRI to Digitize, Database, and Document the Morphological Diversity of Fish Rachel M. Berquist1, Kristen M. Gledhill1, Matthew W. Peterson1, Allyson H. Doan1, Gregory T. Baxter1, Kara E. Yopak1, Ning Kang1, H. J. Walker2, Philip A. Hastings2, Lawrence R. Frank1,3* 1 Center for Scientific Computation in Imaging, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 2 Marine Vertebrate Collection and Marine Biology Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America, 3 Center for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America Abstract Museum fish collections possess a wealth of anatomical and morphological data that are essential for documenting and understanding biodiversity. Obtaining access to specimens for research, however, is not always practical and frequently conflicts with the need to maintain the physical integrity of specimens and the collection as a whole. Non-invasive three- dimensional (3D) digital imaging therefore serves a critical role in facilitating the digitization of these specimens for anatomical and morphological analysis as well as facilitating an efficient method for online storage and sharing of this imaging data. Here we describe the development of the Digital Fish Library (DFL, http://www.digitalfishlibrary.org), an online digital archive of high-resolution, high-contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the soft tissue anatomy of an array of fishes preserved in the Marine Vertebrate Collection of Scripps Institution of Oceanography. We have imaged and uploaded MRI data for over 300 marine and freshwater species, developed a data archival and retrieval system with a web-based image analysis and visualization tool, and integrated these into the public DFL website to disseminate data and associated metadata freely over the web. We show that MRI is a rapid and powerful method for accurately depicting the in- situ soft-tissue anatomy of preserved fishes in sufficient detail for large-scale comparative digital morphology. However these 3D volumetric data require a sophisticated computational and archival infrastructure in order to be broadly accessible to researchers and educators. Citation: Berquist RM, Gledhill KM, Peterson MW, Doan AH, Baxter GT, et al. (2012) The Digital Fish Library: Using MRI to Digitize, Database, and Document the Morphological Diversity of Fish. PLoS ONE 7(4): e34499. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034499 Editor: Andrew Iwaniuk, University of Lethbridge, Canada Received August 30, 2011; Accepted March 2, 2012; Published April 6, 2012 Copyright: ß 2012 Berquist et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: The DFL received its primary funding from the Biological Infrastructure Program (Grant DBI-0446389) of the National Science Foundation (NSF: http:// www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div = DBI) with additional funding provided by NSF award EF-0850369. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected] Introduction the significant recent advances in imaging, software, and computer hardware technologies to develop digital libraries [4–7]. In Natural history collections possess a wealth of anatomical, principal, a comprehensive digital library would provide a morphological, genetic and geographic data that are essential for complete set of tools and methods to collect, visualize, analyze, documenting and understanding biodiversity [1–3]. Although archive, and disseminate high resolution imaging data over the some of the materials housed in fish collections include dried hard web. In practice, developing a comprehensive program that tissue preparations, cleared-and-stained specimens, and tissues integrates all of these aspects is a significant technological and samples for molecular genetic analysis, the bulk of these collections organizational task. In this paper we describe our current progress typically contain intact ‘wet’ specimens that have been preserved on the Digital Fish Library project (DFL, http://www. in formalin and post-fixed in alcohol for long-term storage. digitalfishlibrary.org), which aims to develop such a program with However, broad access to this material is commonly impeded by a particular focus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of fishes stringent storage requirements, which involve hazardous liquids, housed in the Marine Vertebrate Collection (MVC) of the Scripps fragile storage containers (glass), and cramped storage facilities. Institution of Oceanography (SIO). However, while we have Access is often further limited by the desire of curators to maintain focused on a particular imaging modality and a specific collection the long-term integrity of specimens, especially in the case of of specimens, the methods and integrated infrastructure, which we holotypes and species that are delicate, rare, or difficult to obtain. report here, are applicable to a wide range of applications. This is This can conflict with specimen usage, which often requires the demonstrated with examples of research projects that have dissection, and sometimes even the destruction, of specimens in developed from, and the use of the techniques developed for, order to reveal internal anatomical and morphological detail. the DFL [8–15]. Moreover, the DFL infrastructure serves as one As the cost of maintaining physical collections becomes successful model for digital library creation and maintenance. It increasingly expensive, the biology community is faced with the has great flexibility and can be used for data assimilation from a difficult problem of how to preserve these valuable research and variety of sources, including not only newly acquired specimens education resources. One approach to this problem is to leverage PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 April 2012 | Volume 7 | Issue 4 | e34499 The Digital Fish Library from specific collections (e.g. the MVC), but incorporation of data strength of the magnetic field of the scanner and the ability of its acquired from other modalities (CT, x-ray, photography, genetics, hardware to detect the resulting MR signal in specimen tissues. etc), from other groups or projects, or from scanning specimens in Cloutier et al. [22] were the first to apply standard anatomical other taxa. This digital infrastructure also provides great flexibility MRI to postmortem fish, demonstrating that proton resonance in data exploration. T1, T2 and FLASH pulse sequences provided selective enhance- The primary goal of the DFL was to digitize a representative set ment of cranial tissues in a coelacanth, Latimeria chalumnae. These of fish species from the MVC because of the tenuous state of the methods distinguished cartilage, muscles, brain, and various future of these types of collections [1]. But beyond merely digitally connective tissues, confirming gross soft tissue anatomy previously preserving these specimens, digital imaging provides a means of described from dissection. Although other groups have since used visualizing and quantifying their anatomy, facilitating morpholog- similar methods to depict the internal soft tissue anatomy in a ical investigations without the need for invasive dissection. number of freshly collected and preserved species [23–32], Although there is a variety of modern high resolution scanning resulting image quality has been limited, with the application of methods of potential utility for imaging fish, the strength of MRI is high quality MRI for detailed anatomical studies of fishes for in its ability to image soft tissues, as it is sensitive to a broad range comparative morphology still not sufficiently demonstrated. This of physical parameters related to tissue physiology and architec- has been due in part to their use of MRI scanners (typically 1.5 ture. For anatomical imaging, MRI may be viewed as a Tesla (T) and 3T) and hardware designed for human clinical complimentary technique to computed tomography (CT), which studies, rather than those (typically 7T and 11.7T) developed for has poor specificity for contrasting soft tissues but is excellent for smaller animal research. Though much more widely available imaging hard tissues such as bone. Both CT and MRI are than high-field small animal systems, clinical scanners impose currently the most widely accessible technologies with the capacity limitations on the attainable MRI signal due to their larger bore to acquire high-resolution (i.e. sub-millimeter down to around sizes (and thus lower field strengths), and restricted gradient 15 mm) standardized 3D volumetric data from whole specimens settings necessary to ensure patient safety. Furthermore, MRI is encompassing the size range typical of most fishes (,1cmto extremely sensitive to the structural and chemical nature of tissue, .2 m), and have become familiar tools for imaging the in situ and therefore the physical condition of postmortem specimens and anatomy of animals [16]. However, the advantages of MRI come the environment to which they have been exposed have significant at a price - high resolution 3D MRI scanning often requires
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 500 Natural Sciences and Mathematics
    500 500 Natural sciences and mathematics Natural sciences: sciences that deal with matter and energy, or with objects and processes observable in nature Class here interdisciplinary works on natural and applied sciences Class natural history in 508. Class scientific principles of a subject with the subject, plus notation 01 from Table 1, e.g., scientific principles of photography 770.1 For government policy on science, see 338.9; for applied sciences, see 600 See Manual at 231.7 vs. 213, 500, 576.8; also at 338.9 vs. 352.7, 500; also at 500 vs. 001 SUMMARY 500.2–.8 [Physical sciences, space sciences, groups of people] 501–509 Standard subdivisions and natural history 510 Mathematics 520 Astronomy and allied sciences 530 Physics 540 Chemistry and allied sciences 550 Earth sciences 560 Paleontology 570 Biology 580 Plants 590 Animals .2 Physical sciences For astronomy and allied sciences, see 520; for physics, see 530; for chemistry and allied sciences, see 540; for earth sciences, see 550 .5 Space sciences For astronomy, see 520; for earth sciences in other worlds, see 550. For space sciences aspects of a specific subject, see the subject, plus notation 091 from Table 1, e.g., chemical reactions in space 541.390919 See Manual at 520 vs. 500.5, 523.1, 530.1, 919.9 .8 Groups of people Add to base number 500.8 the numbers following —08 in notation 081–089 from Table 1, e.g., women in science 500.82 501 Philosophy and theory Class scientific method as a general research technique in 001.4; class scientific method applied in the natural sciences in 507.2 502 Miscellany 577 502 Dewey Decimal Classification 502 .8 Auxiliary techniques and procedures; apparatus, equipment, materials Including microscopy; microscopes; interdisciplinary works on microscopy Class stereology with compound microscopes, stereology with electron microscopes in 502; class interdisciplinary works on photomicrography in 778.3 For manufacture of microscopes, see 681.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION In nearly every body of water around the world, the most abundant vertebrate is a fi sh. From the deepest parts of the ocean to high alpine streams, fi shes live and reproduce, sometimes in places where no other vertebrates can survive. Whether peering out from a submarine while conducting deep-sea research, or stopping for a drink of water during a hike in the mountains, explorers, scientists, and naturalists fi nd fi shes. With well over 30,000 species, fi shes account for more than half of the total extant vertebrate diversity on Earth— in other words, there are more living species of fi shes than of amphibians, turtles, lizards, birds, and mammals combined. Not only are fi shes diverse in number of their species, but they are diverse in the habitats in which they live, the foods that they eat, the ways in which they reproduce, communicate, and interact with their environment, and the behaviors that they exhibit. Fishes can also be extremely abundant: the most abundant vertebrates on the planet are the small bristlemouth fi shes (Gonostomatidae) that are common throughout the vast open ocean. In some cases abundant fi shes such as cods, tunas, salmons, herrings, and anchovies support massive fi sheries that feed hundreds of millions of people. By supporting coastal communities and societies, these fi sheries (and the fi shes they target) have helped shape human history, becoming the foundation for coastal economies and an engine for global exploration and expansion. WHAT IS A FISH? Humans use the term “fi sh” to refer to several groups of vertebrates that do not have a clear set of diagnostic characteristics unique to them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Profile Madagascar and Indian
    ECOSYSTEM PROFILE MADAGASCAR AND INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS FINAL VERSION DECEMBER 2014 This version of the Ecosystem Profile, based on the draft approved by the Donor Council of CEPF was finalized in December 2014 to include clearer maps and correct minor errors in Chapter 12 and Annexes Page i Prepared by: Conservation International - Madagascar Under the supervision of: Pierre Carret (CEPF) With technical support from: Moore Center for Science and Oceans - Conservation International Missouri Botanical Garden And support from the Regional Advisory Committee Léon Rajaobelina, Conservation International - Madagascar Richard Hughes, WWF – Western Indian Ocean Edmond Roger, Université d‘Antananarivo, Département de Biologie et Ecologie Végétales Christopher Holmes, WCS – Wildlife Conservation Society Steve Goodman, Vahatra Will Turner, Moore Center for Science and Oceans, Conservation International Ali Mohamed Soilihi, Point focal du FEM, Comores Xavier Luc Duval, Point focal du FEM, Maurice Maurice Loustau-Lalanne, Point focal du FEM, Seychelles Edmée Ralalaharisoa, Point focal du FEM, Madagascar Vikash Tatayah, Mauritian Wildlife Foundation Nirmal Jivan Shah, Nature Seychelles Andry Ralamboson Andriamanga, Alliance Voahary Gasy Idaroussi Hamadi, CNDD- Comores Luc Gigord - Conservatoire botanique du Mascarin, Réunion Claude-Anne Gauthier, Muséum National d‘Histoire Naturelle, Paris Jean-Paul Gaudechoux, Commission de l‘Océan Indien Drafted by the Ecosystem Profiling Team: Pierre Carret (CEPF) Harison Rabarison, Nirhy Rabibisoa, Setra Andriamanaitra,
    [Show full text]
  • 33 Abstract Dna Barcoding, Phylogenetic Diversity
    DNA BARCODING, PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY STUDIES OF ETROPLUS SURATENSIS FISH FROM POORANANKUPPAM BRACKISH WATER, PUDUCHERRY Sachithanandam V.1, Mohan P.M.1, Muruganandam N.2, Chaaithanya I.K.2, Arun Kumar P3, Siva Sankar R3 1 ijcrr Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Vol 04 issue 08 Andaman 2Regional Medical Research Centre (ICMR), Andaman Category: Research 3Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry University, Received on:29/01/12 Puducherry Revised on:16/02/12 E-mail of Corresponding Author: [email protected] Accepted on:03/03/12 ABSTRACT Etroplus suratensis is known for the high commercial value fish available in South India. The identification of the species of this fish cumbersome and inaccurate in different life stages of the fish. Therefore, DNA sequence of cytochrome Oxidase subunit I gene was analysed for the species identification and phylogenetic relationship of the species. The average genetic distance of conspecifics species value was found to be 0.005%. The present work suggests that COI sequence provides sufficient information on phylogenetic and evolutionary relationship to distinguish the Etroplus suratensis species, the brackish waters species of pearl spots, unambiguously. Further, this work revealed that every species having individual genetic distances depended upon the environmental stress and water quality, which play an important role for its minor morphometric variations. Therefore, it was concluded that a DNA COI barcoding tool can be used for fish identification by non technical personnel (other than taxonomist). ____________________________________________________________________________________ Keywords: DNA barcoding, COI, brackish of more than US$ 3/kg2. These fish is available water, Pooranankuppam and Etroplus suratensis throughout the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Etroplus Suratensis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Green Chromide Cichlid (Etroplus suratensis) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, April 2011 Revised, September 2018 Web Version, 6/5/2019 Photo: P. Corbett. Licensed under CC BY 2.0. Available: https://flic.kr/p/tmiiei. (September 2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Western Indian Ocean: India and Sri Lanka.” 1 From Abraham (2011): “Etroplus suratensis is distributed in the coastal regions of peninsular India and Sri Lanka. In India, the wild populations have been recorded from the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu.” Status in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. This species is in trade in the United States. From Imperial Tropicals (2015): “Green Chromide Cichlid (Etroplus suratensis) […] $ 19.99” From Bluegrass Aquatics (2019): “Green Chromide Cichlid – REGULAR $26.98” Means of Introductions in the United States This species has not been reported as introduced or established in the United States. 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From ITIS (2018): “Kingdom Animalia Subkingdom Bilateria Infrakingdom Deuterostomia Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Infraphylum Gnathostomata Superclass Actinopterygii Class Teleostei Superorder Acanthopterygii Order Perciformes Suborder Labroidei Family Cichlidae Genus Etroplus Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790)” From Fricke et al. (2018): “Current status: Valid as Etroplus suratensis (Bloch 1790). Cichlidae: Etroplinae.” 2 Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Max length : 40.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Menon 1999]; common length : 20.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Pethiyagoda 1991]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2018): “Brackish; benthopelagic; depth range 10 - ? m.
    [Show full text]
  • Esox Lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Northern Pike (Esox lucius) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2019 Web Version, 8/26/2019 Photo: Ryan Hagerty/USFWS. Public Domain – Government Work. Available: https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/26990/rec/22. (February 1, 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Circumpolar in fresh water. North America: Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Great Lakes, and Mississippi River basins from Labrador to Alaska and south to Pennsylvania and Nebraska, USA [Page and Burr 2011]. Eurasia: Caspian, Black, Baltic, White, Barents, Arctic, North and Aral Seas and Atlantic basins, southwest to Adour drainage; Mediterranean basin in Rhône drainage and northern Italy. Widely distributed in central Asia and Siberia easward [sic] to Anadyr drainage (Bering Sea basin). Historically absent from Iberian Peninsula, Mediterranean France, central Italy, southern and western Greece, eastern Adriatic basin, Iceland, western Norway and northern Scotland.” Froese and Pauly (2019a) list Esox lucius as native in Armenia, Azerbaijan, China, Georgia, Iran, Kazakhstan, Mongolia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Moldova, Monaco, 1 Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States (including Alaska). From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Occurs in Erqishi river and Ulungur lake [in China].” “Known from the Selenge drainage [in Mongolia] [Kottelat 2006].” “[In Turkey:] Known from the European Black Sea watersheds, Anatolian Black Sea watersheds, Central and Western Anatolian lake watersheds, and Gulf watersheds (Firat Nehri, Dicle Nehri).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian and Madagascan Cichlids
    FAMILY Cichlidae Bonaparte, 1835 - cichlids SUBFAMILY Etroplinae Kullander, 1998 - Indian and Madagascan cichlids [=Etroplinae H] GENUS Etroplus Cuvier, in Cuvier & Valenciennes, 1830 - cichlids [=Chaetolabrus, Microgaster] Species Etroplus canarensis Day, 1877 - Canara pearlspot Species Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) - green chromide [=caris, meleagris] GENUS Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868 - cichlids [=Lamena] Species Paretroplus dambabe Sparks, 2002 - dambabe cichlid Species Paretroplus damii Bleeker, 1868 - damba Species Paretroplus gymnopreopercularis Sparks, 2008 - Sparks' cichlid Species Paretroplus kieneri Arnoult, 1960 - kotsovato Species Paretroplus lamenabe Sparks, 2008 - big red cichlid Species Paretroplus loisellei Sparks & Schelly, 2011 - Loiselle's cichlid Species Paretroplus maculatus Kiener & Mauge, 1966 - damba mipentina Species Paretroplus maromandia Sparks & Reinthal, 1999 - maromandia cichlid Species Paretroplus menarambo Allgayer, 1996 - pinstripe damba Species Paretroplus nourissati (Allgayer, 1998) - lamena Species Paretroplus petiti Pellegrin, 1929 - kotso Species Paretroplus polyactis Bleeker, 1878 - Bleeker's paretroplus Species Paretroplus tsimoly Stiassny et al., 2001 - tsimoly cichlid GENUS Pseudetroplus Bleeker, in G, 1862 - cichlids Species Pseudetroplus maculatus (Bloch, 1795) - orange chromide [=coruchi] SUBFAMILY Ptychochrominae Sparks, 2004 - Malagasy cichlids [=Ptychochrominae S2002] GENUS Katria Stiassny & Sparks, 2006 - cichlids Species Katria katria (Reinthal & Stiassny, 1997) - Katria cichlid GENUS
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Cichlid Society Incorporated
    tthehe Did you hear that somebody cichlid mmonthlyonthly really cool is going to advertise here? As cool as us? . Used with permission David Callele Picture Copyright 2007 Victorian Cichlid Society Incorporated 36:04, May 2007 $1.10 Certificate of Incorporation # A0012794D REGISTERED BY AUSTRALIA POST - PP342780/0024 do not accept that there is anyone 20 I who is actually incapable of CCOMMITTEE:OMMITTEE: 1 writing an article about their fi sh, or ccichlidichlidGGetet youryour TCMTCM TThehe PRESIDENT: experiences with fi sh. I do, however, John McCormick ......................5944 3502 know how much I hate writing [email protected] Editorials. They are usually left to last sscenecene ICE RESIDENT LLastast V -P : and often hurried. This method has Klaus Schwarzenholz .........0414 444 737 landed me in “trouble” in the past THE NEXT MEETING of the Society willLLiving iving CColourolour due to dotting a few “t”s, crossing be held on the first Wednesday of the SECRETARY: WWordord month at 8 pm sharp (the Trading Table Graham Rowe ...........................9560-7472 an “i” or two, and in several cases, [email protected] Daryl Hutchins.. misplacing a comma. opens earlier) in the Mitcham Scout Hall, ggoo ttoo Brunswick Road, Mitcham. Visitors are TREASURER: A much better method that I have heartily encouraged to come along.hhttp://home.vicnet.net.au/ttp://hTonyom Fergusone.v i....................0408cnet.ne 533t. 552au/ s a result of recent discussions found is to write small notes in my CICHLID OF THE MONTH: Trout Cichlid Aat meetings both General and committee diary (yes, I jot down all ~~cichlid/MagList.htcichEDITORlid: /MagList.htm Committee, and weighing all the pros - Tony Ferguson.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21St Century
    Copeia 103, No. 4, 2015, 858–873 When Tradition Meets Technology: Systematic Morphology of Fishes in the Early 21st Century Eric J. Hilton1, Nalani K. Schnell2, and Peter Konstantinidis1 Many of the primary groups of fishes currently recognized have been established through an iterative process of anatomical study and comparison of fishes that has spanned a time period approaching 500 years. In this paper we give a brief history of the systematic morphology of fishes, focusing on some of the individuals and their works from which we derive our own inspiration. We further discuss what is possible at this point in history in the anatomical study of fishes and speculate on the future of morphology used in the systematics of fishes. Beyond the collection of facts about the anatomy of fishes, morphology remains extremely relevant in the age of molecular data for at least three broad reasons: 1) new techniques for the preparation of specimens allow new data sources to be broadly compared; 2) past morphological analyses, as well as new ideas about interrelationships of fishes (based on both morphological and molecular data) provide rich sources of hypotheses to test with new morphological investigations; and 3) the use of morphological data is not limited to understanding phylogeny and evolution of fishes, but rather is of broad utility to understanding the general biology (including phenotypic adaptation, evolution, ecology, and conservation biology) of fishes. Although in some ways morphology struggles to compete with the lure of molecular data for systematic research, we see the anatomical study of fishes entering into a new and exciting phase of its history because of recent technological and methodological innovations.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 115(3):546-563
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON 115(3):546-563. 2002. Paretroplus dambabe, a new cichlid fish (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from northwestern Madagascar, with a discussion on the status of P. petiti John S. Sparks Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, U.S.A., e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. —Paretroplus dambabe, n. sp., is described from Lake Kinkony, northwestern Madagascar. The new species is distinguished from congeners in Hfe and preservation by light yellowish-oUve body coloration in combination with a series of 6-7 vertical charcoal bars on the flanks, a blunt head profile, body depth not exceeding 57.1%SL, and uniform dark charcoal-gray or black fins. Paretroplus dambabe is further distinguished from P. petiti, a species to which it has been mistakenly referred for decades, by overall pigmentation pattern (light yellow-olive vs. dark brown), the presence of bright red pigmen- tation on the flanks in life, a prominent vertical barring pattern, and a shallower body. Paretroplus Bleeker, 1868, the most spe- pelvic axillary scale, and well-developed ciose cichlid genus in Madagascar, com- ridges of scales ("scale sheathing" of Cich- prises nine described species, excluding the ocki, 1976) extending over, but not fused new taxon (Table 1). Paretroplus is endem- to, both the dorsal- and anal-fin bases. A ic to Madagascar, and members are distrib- number of additional features diagnostic of uted throughout the northwestern part of the both Etroplinae and Paretroplus, as well as island (8 species) and in eastern drainages a species-level phylogenetic analysis, are (1 species), where the range of P.
    [Show full text]
  • MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS in FISH from the GUADALUPE RIVER, TEXAS: RELATIONSHIPS with BODY LENGTH and TROPHIC POSITION by Taylor Re
    MERCURY CONCENTRATIONS IN FISH FROM THE GUADALUPE RIVER, TEXAS: RELATIONSHIPS WITH BODY LENGTH AND TROPHIC POSITION by Taylor Rene Gold Quiros, B.S. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Council of Texas State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a Major in Aquatic Resources December 2018 Committee Members: Jessica Dutton, Chair Tim Bonner Weston Nowlin Clint Robertson COPYRIGHT by Taylor Rene Gold Quiros 2018 FAIR USE AND AUTHOR’S PERMISSION STATEMENT Fair Use This work is protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States (Public Law 94-553, section 107). Consistent with fair use as defined in the Copyright Laws, brief quotations from this material are allowed with proper acknowledgement. Use of this material for financial gain without the author’s express written permission is not allowed. Duplication Permission As the copyright holder of this work I, Taylor Rene Gold Quiros, authorize duplication of this work, in whole or in part, for educational or scholarly purposes only. DEDICATION My Toby. Te amo. I miss you ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor Dr. Jessica Dutton; her office was always open whenever I ran into a trouble spot or had a question about my research or writing. Dr. Tim Bonner and Dr. Weston Nowlin were incredibly helpful in teaching me how to think like a scientist and their patience with my questions was without end. Gratitude is also due to Clint Robertson, without whom I wouldn’t have fish to analyze in the first place nor would I know the differences between those pesky sunfish.
    [Show full text]