DOCSLIB.ORG

Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury Acute Management of Spinal Cord Injury Dan Rutigliano, D.O Director of Inpatient Trauma Stony Brook Trauma Center No financial disclosures OVERVIEW • Spinal anatomy/classification • Evaluating a patient with suspected spinal injury • Broad management principles of spinal injury • Hypovolaemic vs neurogenic vs spinal shock SPINAL CORD INJURY: EPIDEMIOLOGY In the United States, the incidence of spinal cord injury in 2010 was approximately 40 per million persons per year, or approximately 12,400 annually • Causes in the United States are: - Motor vehicle accidents: 48 percent - Falls: 16 percent - Violence (especially gunshot wounds): 12 percent - Sports accidents: 10 percent - Other: 14 percent Prior to 2000, the most frequent occurrence was a young male with a median age of 22. Since that time, the average age has increased to 37 years in 2010, presumably as a reflection of the aging population. Males continue to make up 77 to 80 percent of cases. Alcohol plays a role in at least 25 percent of TSCI ANATOMY Location of Spinal Injuries 55% in cervical region (mobile and exposed) 15% in thoracic region (less mobile and protected) 15% in thoracolumbar region (fulcrum) 15% in lumbosacral region ANATOMY • Upper cervical region is wide from foramen magnum to lower part C3 - 1/3 die at scene from apnea - those that survive are usually neurologically intact when they reach the hospital ANATOMY • Below C3 the diameter of the spinal canal is smaller - vertebral column injuries are more likely to produce spinal cord injuries • Most thoracic spine fractures are wedge compression fractures without spinal cord injury - high association with a complete spinal cord injury because of narrow thoracic canal • Thoracolumbar junction is where the inflexible thoracic spine meets the strong lumbar spine making it an area vulnerable to injury ANATOMY • Multiple ascending and descending tracts in the spinal cord • 3 clinically relevant ones - lateral corticospinal tract - Controls motor functions on SAME side - spinothalamic tract - transmits pain and temp sensations from the OPPOSITE side - dorsal columns - transmits proprioception and vibration senses from the SAME side ANATOMY Dermatome- area of skin supplied by a single spinal nerve or cord segment Myotome- the muscle/s supplied by a single spinal nerve or cord segment SPINAL CORD INJURY: CLASSIFICATION • Injuries to the spinal cord can be categorized in numerous ways - Incomplete paraplegia (incomplete thoracic injury) - Incomplete quadriplegia (incomplete cervical injury) - Complete paraplegia - Complete quadriplegia SPINAL CORD INJURY: CLASSIFICATION Injuries may have complete or incomplete neurological symptoms • Complete injury patients demonstrate total and flaccid paralysis, total anesthesia/analgesia, and no tendon reflexes • Incomplete injury will demonstrate partial paralysis w/ altered sensation and preserved sacral function (sacral sparing) SPINAL CORD INJURY: CLASSIFICATIONS Different patterns of injury can result in various “syndromes” • Central Cord Syndrome • Anterior Cord Syndrome • Posterior Cord Syndrome • Brown-Sequard Syndrome • Cauda Equina Syndrome SPINAL CORD INJURY: CLASSIFICATION Spinal injuries can also be described as: • Fractures • Fracture-dislocations • Penetrating injury • Spinal Cord Injury without Radiographic Abnormalities (SCIWRA) SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Signs and Symptoms: • Pain • Tingling, numbness and weakness in periphery • Loss of sensation or paralysis below the level of injury • Respiratory distress • Incontinence • Priapism SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Evaluation and care starts with the ABCs of trauma • A=airway - Need to establish an airway while maintaining c- spine immobilization - Place a definitive airway early if respiratory compromise is suspected- typically with high cervical injury (C3/4/5) SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Evaluation and care starts with the ABCs of trauma • B=breathing - evaluate for any associated symptoms to indicate underlying pulmonary trauma - monitor for accessory muscle use to indicate impending respiratory collapse - use supplemental oxygen to prevent hypoxia SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Evaluation and care starts with the ABCs of trauma • C=circulation - identify and control any bleeding from injuries - Maintain a normal blood pressure to prevent secondary spinal injury - ? spinal shock- aggressive fluid resuscitation, pressers may be required SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Evaluation and care starts with the ABCs of trauma • D=disability - Check patient’s GCS status - exam for equal and reactive pupils - evaluate all 4 extremities for signs of weakness or loss of sensation - perform a rectal exam to evaluate for sphincter tone - evaluate for priapism, bulbocavernosus reflex SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Evaluation and care starts with the ABCs of trauma • E=exposure - remove all clothes to fully evaluate for injuries - carefully log roll the pt to palpate the spine and paraspinal regions ‣ identify all areas of pain with palpation - patients with high spinal injuries may be vasodilated and unable to regulate temperature ‣ Cover patients with warm blankets SPINAL INJURY: EVALUATION Adjuncts to primary survey • Done after completion of ABCs • Patient should be on continuous monitoring of vitals • CXR and pelvic x-rays typically performed • FAST exam- bedside ultrasound to evaluate for bleeding in the abdomen as a source of hypotension • Placement of Foley catheter, OGT • Obtain a full medical history- important to ask about use of anticoagulants! SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Spinal Imaging • X-rays- not done as first line, provided limited information, can be difficult to obtain needed views • CT scan- gold standard for defining bony injuries, typically done as 1st line imaging as part of the trauma “pan scan” • MRI- useful to identify ligamentous injury or contusions/compression of the spinal cord SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Identify the level of spinal cord injury • Make note of both sensory and motor deficit levels ANATOMY Dermatome- area of skin supplied by a single spinal nerve or cord segment Myotome- the muscle/s supplied by a single spinal nerve or cord segment SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION Identify the level of spinal cord injury • Make note of both sensory and motor deficit levels SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Classification • Allows for standardized classification of spinal cord • Based on • severity of neurological deficit- A=complete to E=normal • the neurological level- identify the most caudal segment with normal function SPINAL CORD INJURY: EVALUATION SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Phases of injury • Primary spinal cord injury- injury to spinal cord directly related to fractures, dislocations, compression, bleeding • Secondary spinal injury- resulting from prolong mechanical instability or subsequent episodes of hypotension, hypoxia, infections SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Management principles: Stabilize the primary source of injury; prevent any secondary injury from occurring • Immobilization • IV fluid resuscitation • Medications • Surgery SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Strict immobilization • 5% of patients with existing injury experience a worsening or new onset of symptoms after arriving to the ED- poor immobilization techniques • use a cervical collar • if a pt needs intubation must maintain inline cervical stabilization • These are potentially difficult intubations • maintain patients flat and on bedrest until appropriate bracing is in place if appropriate SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT IV fluid resuscitation • maintain SBP > 90mm Hg • Normal saline bolus • If blood pressure is refractory to fluid resuscitation consider neurogenic shock SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Hypovolemic Shock vs Neurogenic SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Neurogenic Shock: • Mechanism- impairment of descending sympathetic pathways in the cervical or upper thorax (usually above T6) - Leads to a loss of vascular sympathetic motor tone ‣ Results in peripheral vasodilation, pooling of blood and hypotension - Loss of sympathetic stimulus to the heart (injury above T1) ‣ Results in bradycardia and lack of reflexive tachycardia response to hypotension SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Neurogenic Shock vs Spinal shock SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Spinal Shock: • Mechanism- transient loss of voluntary and reflexive neurologic function below the level of injury - Spinal cord dysfunction maybe transient but can last days to months - flaccid paralysis, bowel and bladder incontinence, priapism - first reflexes to return are bulbocavernosus and babinski SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Neurogenic Shock • Management - Hypotension: ‣ Bolus of crystalloid fluids- may require large amounts but beware of fluid overload and pulmonary edema ‣ Vasopressors- typically a pure alpha-blocking agent such as phenylephrine ‣ Goal is to maintain end organ perfusion- warm extremities, MAP >65mm Hg, UO >0.5cc/kr/hr - Bradycardia: treatment only needed if persistent hypotension ‣ Atropine given for acute therapy ‣ Pacemaker can be needed rarely in refractory cases ‣ Avoid over-zealous vagal stimulation such as NT suctioning, ETT manipulation, carotid massage SPINAL CORD INJURY: MANAGEMENT Medical therapy: • Corticosteroids- Aimed at reducing the extent of secondary spinal damage - Most trials have used high dose methylprednisolone ‣ to be given within 8 hrs from time of injury ‣ bolus first given followed by IV infusion for 24-48hrs - Insufficient evidence to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report 2020
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Research Grant Program Report January 15, 2020 Author About the Minnesota Office of Higher Education Alaina DeSalvo The Minnesota Office of Higher Education is a Competitive Grants Administrator cabinet-level state agency providing students with Tel: 651-259-3988 financial aid programs and information to help [email protected] them gain access to postsecondary education. The agency also serves as the state’s clearinghouse for data, research and analysis on postsecondary enrollment, financial aid, finance and trends. The Minnesota State Grant Program is the largest financial aid program administered by the Office of Higher Education, awarding up to $207 million in need-based grants to Minnesota residents attending eligible colleges, universities and career schools in Minnesota. The agency oversees other state scholarship programs, tuition reciprocity programs, a student loan program, Minnesota’s 529 College Savings Plan, licensing and early college awareness programs for youth. Minnesota Office of Higher Education 1450 Energy Park Drive, Suite 350 Saint Paul, MN 55108-5227 Tel: 651.642.0567 or 800.657.3866 TTY Relay: 800.627.3529 Fax: 651.642.0675 Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction 1 Spinal Cord Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury Advisory Council 1 FY 2020 Proposal Solicitation Schedule
    [Show full text]
  • Suplento1 Volumen 71 En
    S1 Volumen 71 Mayo 2015 Revista Española de Vol. 71 Supl. 1 • Mayo 2015 Vol. Clínica e Investigación Órgano de expresión de la Sociedad Española de SEINAP Investigación en Nutrición y Alimentación en Pediatría Sumario XXX CONGRESO DE LA SOCIEDAD espaÑOLA DE CUIDADOS INTENSIVOS PEDIÁTRICOS Toledo, 7-9 de mayo de 2015 MESA REDONDA: ¿HACIA DÓNDE VAMOS EN LA MESA REDONDA: EL PACIENTE AGUDO MONITORIZACIÓN? CRONIFICADO EN UCIP 1 Monitorización mediante pulsioximetría: ¿sólo saturación 47 Nutrición en el paciente crítico de larga estancia en UCIP. de oxígeno? P. García Soler Z. Martínez de Compañón Martínez de Marigorta 3 Avances en la monitorización de la sedoanalgesia. S. Mencía 53 Traqueostomía, ¿cuándo realizarla? M.A. García Teresa Bartolomé y Grupo de Sedoanalgesia de la SECIP 60 Los cuidados de enfermería, ¿un reto? J.M. García Piñero 8 Avances en neuromonitorización. B. Cabeza Martín CHARLA-COLOQUIO SESIÓN DE PUESTA AL DÍA: ¿ES BENEFICIOSA LA 64 La formación en la preparación de las UCIPs FLUIDOTERAPIA PARA MI PACIENTE? españolas frente al riesgo de epidemias infecciosas. 13 Sobrecarga de líquidos y morbimortalidad asociada. J.C. de Carlos Vicente M.T. Alonso 68 Lecciones aprendidas durante la crisis del Ébola: 20 Estrategias de fluidoterapia racional en Cuidados experiencia del intensivista de adultos. J.C. Figueira Intensivos Pediátricos. P. de la Oliva Senovilla Iglesias 72 El niño con enfermedad por virus Ébola: un nuevo reto MESA REDONDA: INDICADORES DE CALIDAD para el intensivista pediátrico. E. Álvarez Rojas DE LA SECIP 23 Evolución de la cultura de seguridad en UCIP. MESA REDONDA: UCIP ABIERTAS 24 HORAS, La comunicación efectiva.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Injury
    SPINAL INJURY Presented by:- Bhagawati Ray DEFINITION Spinal cord injury (SCI) is damage to the spinal cord that results in a loss of function such as mobility or feeling. TYPES OF SPINAL CORD INJURY Complete Spinal Cord Injuries Complete paraplegia is described as permanent loss of motor and nerve function at T1 level or below, resulting in loss of sensation and movement in the legs, bowel, bladder, and sexual region. Arms and hands retain normal function. INCOMPLETE SPINAL CORD INJURIES Anterior cord syndrome Anterior cord syndrome, due to damage to the front portion of the spinal cord or reduction in the blood supply from the anterior spinal artery, can be caused by fractures or dislocations of vertebrae or herniated disks. CENTRAL CORD SYNDROME Central cord syndrome, almost always resulting from damage to the cervical spinal cord, is characterized by weakness in the arms with relative sparing of the legs, and spared sensation in regions served by the sacral segments. POSTERIOR CORD SYNDROME Posterior cord syndrome, in which just the dorsal columns of the spinal cord are affected, is usually seen in cases of chronic myelopathy but can also occur with infarction of the posterior spinal artery. BROWN-SEQUARD SYNDROME Brown-Sequard syndrome occurs when the spinal cord is injured on one side much more than the other. It is rare for the spinal cord to be truly hemisected (severed on one side), but partial lesions due to penetrating wounds (such as gunshot or knife wounds) or fractured vertebrae or tumors are common. CAUDA EQUINASYNDROME Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a condition that occurs when the bundle of nerves below the end of the spinal cord known as the cauda equina is damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • T5 Spinal Cord Injuries
    Spinal Cord (2020) 58:1249–1254 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0506-7 ARTICLE Predictors of respiratory complications in patients with C5–T5 spinal cord injuries 1 2,3 3,4 1,5 1,5 Júlia Sampol ● Miguel Ángel González-Viejo ● Alba Gómez ● Sergi Martí ● Mercedes Pallero ● 1,4,5 3,4 1,4,5 1,4,5 Esther Rodríguez ● Patricia Launois ● Gabriel Sampol ● Jaume Ferrer Received: 19 December 2019 / Revised: 12 June 2020 / Accepted: 12 June 2020 / Published online: 24 June 2020 © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Spinal Cord Society 2020 Abstract Study design Retrospective chart audit. Objectives Describing the respiratory complications and their predictive factors in patients with acute traumatic spinal cord injuries at C5–T5 level during the initial hospitalization. Setting Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona. Methods Data from patients admitted in a reference unit with acute traumatic injuries involving levels C5–T5. Respiratory complications were defined as: acute respiratory failure, respiratory infection, atelectasis, non-hemothorax pleural effusion, 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: pulmonary embolism or haemoptysis. Candidate predictors of these complications were demographic data, comorbidity, smoking, history of respiratory disease, the spinal cord injury characteristics (level and ASIA Impairment Scale) and thoracic trauma. A logistic regression model was created to determine associations between potential predictors and respiratory complications. Results We studied 174 patients with an age of 47.9 (19.7) years, mostly men (87%), with low comorbidity. Coexistent thoracic trauma was found in 24 (19%) patients with cervical and 35 (75%) with thoracic injuries (p < 0.001). Respiratory complications were frequent (53%) and were associated to longer hospital stay: 83.1 (61.3) and 45.3 (28.1) days in patients with and without respiratory complications (p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Neurologic Deterioration Secondary to Unrecognized Spinal Instability Following Trauma–A Multicenter Study
    SPINE Volume 31, Number 4, pp 451–458 ©2006, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc. Neurologic Deterioration Secondary to Unrecognized Spinal Instability Following Trauma–A Multicenter Study Allan D. Levi, MD, PhD,* R. John Hurlbert, MD, PhD,† Paul Anderson, MD,‡ Michael Fehlings, MD, PhD,§ Raj Rampersaud, MD,§ Eric M. Massicotte, MD,§ John C. France, MD,࿣ Jean Charles Le Huec, MD, PhD,¶ Rune Hedlund, MD,** and Paul Arnold, MD†† Study Design. A retrospective study was undertaken their neurologic injury. The most common reason for the that evaluated the medical records and imaging studies of missed injury was insufficient imaging studies (58.3%), a subset of patients with spinal injury from large level I while only 33.3% were a result of misread radiographs or trauma centers. 8.3% poor quality radiographs. The incidence of missed Objective. To characterize patients with spinal injuries injuries resulting in neurologic injury in patients with who had neurologic deterioration due to unrecognized spine fractures or strains was 0.21%, and the incidence as instability. a percentage of all trauma patients evaluated was 0.025%. Summary of Background Data. Controversy exists re- Conclusions. This multicenter study establishes that garding the most appropriate imaging studies required to missed spinal injuries resulting in a neurologic deficit “clear” the spine in patients suspected of having a spinal continue to occur in major trauma centers despite the column injury. Although most bony and/or ligamentous presence of experienced personnel and sophisticated im- spine injuries are detected early, an occasional patient aging techniques. Older age, high impact accidents, and has an occult injury, which is not detected, and a poten- patients with insufficient imaging are at highest risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Critical Care for Acute Spinal Cord Injury in the Setting of Polytrauma
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS Neurosurg Focus 43 (5):E19, 2017 Update on critical care for acute spinal cord injury in the setting of polytrauma *John K. Yue, BA,1,2 Ethan A. Winkler, MD, PhD,1,2 Jonathan W. Rick, BS,1,2 Hansen Deng, BA,1,2 Carlene P. Partow, BS,1,2 Pavan S. Upadhyayula, BA,3 Harjus S. Birk, MD,3 Andrew K. Chan, MD,1,2 and Sanjay S. Dhall, MD1,2 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco; 2Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco; and 3Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, California Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) often occurs in patients with concurrent traumatic injuries in other body systems. These patients with polytrauma pose unique challenges to clinicians. The current review evaluates existing guidelines and updates the evidence for prehospital transport, immobilization, initial resuscitation, critical care, hemodynamic stabil- ity, diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, and timing appropriate for the patient with SCI who has multisystem trauma. Initial management should be systematic, with focus on spinal immobilization, timely transport, and optimizing perfusion to the spinal cord. There is general evidence for the maintenance of mean arterial pressure of > 85 mm Hg during imme- diate and acute care to optimize neurological outcome; however, the selection of vasopressor type and duration should be judicious, with considerations for level of injury and risks of increased cardiogenic complications in the elderly. Level II recommendations exist for early decompression, and additional time points of neurological assessment within the first 24 hours and during acute care are warranted to determine the temporality of benefits attributable to early surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Posttraumatic Stress Following Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review of Risk and Vulnerability Factors
    Spinal Cord (2017) 55, 800–811 & 2017 International Spinal Cord Society All rights reserved 1362-4393/17 www.nature.com/sc REVIEW Posttraumatic stress following spinal cord injury: a systematic review of risk and vulnerability factors K Pollock1,3, D Dorstyn1,3, L Butt2 and S Prentice1 Objectives: To summarise quantitatively the available evidence relating to pretraumatic, peritraumatic and posttraumatic characteristics that may increase or decrease the risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) following spinal cord injury (SCI). Study design: Systematic review. Methods: Seventeen studies were identified from the PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science and PILOTS databases. Effect size estimates (r) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs), P-values and fail-safe Ns were calculated. Results: Individual studies reported medium-to-large associations between factors that occurred before (psychiatric history r = 0.48 (95% CI, 0.23–0.79) P = 0.01) or at the time of injury (tetraplegia r = − 0.36 (95% CI, − 0.50 to − 0.19) Po0.01). Postinjury factors had the strongest pooled effects: depressed mood (rw = 0.64, (95% CI, 0.54–0.72)), negative appraisals (rw = 0.63 (95% CI, 0.52– 0.72)), distress (rw = 0.57 (95% CI, 0.50–0.62)), anxiety (rw = 0.56 (95% CI, 0.49–0.61)) and pain severity (rw = 0.35 (95% CI, 0.27– 0.43)) were consistently related to worsening PTSD symptoms (Po0.01). Level of injury significantly correlated with current PTSD severity for veteran populations (QB (1) = 18.25, Po0.001), although this was based on limited data.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Shock
    REVIEW Pediatric shock Usha Sethuraman† & Pediatric shock accounts for significant mortality and morbidity worldwide, but remains Nirmala Bhaya incompletely understood in many ways, even today. Despite varied etiologies, the end result †Author for correspondence of pediatric shock is a state of energy failure and inadequate supply to meet the metabolic Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Division of demands of the body. Although the mortality rate of septic shock is decreasing, the severity Emergency Medicine, is on the rise. Changing epidemiology due to effective eradication programs has brought in Carman and Ann Adams new microorganisms. In the past, adult criteria had been used for the diagnosis and Department of Pediatrics, 3901 Beaubien Boulevard, management of septic shock in pediatrics. These have been modified in recent times to suit Detroit, MI 48201, USA the pediatric and neonatal population. In this article we review the pathophysiology, Tel.: +1 313 745 5260 epidemiology and recent guidelines in the management of pediatric shock. Fax: +1 313 993 7166 [email protected] Shock is an acute syndrome in which the circu- to generate ATP. It is postulated that in the face of latory system is unable to provide adequate oxy- prolonged systemic inflammatory insult, overpro- gen and nutrients to meet the metabolic duction of cytokines, nitric oxide and other medi- demands of vital organs [1]. Due to the inade- ators, and in the face of hypoxia and tissue quate ATP production to support function, the hypoperfusion, the body responds by turning off cell reverts to anaerobic metabolism, causing the most energy-consuming biophysiological acute energy failure [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Ventilation Guide
    MAYO CLINIC MECHANICAL VENTILATION GUIDE RESP GOALS INITIAL MONITORING TARGETS FAILURE SETTINGS 6 P’s BASIC HEMODYNAMIC 1 BLOOD PRESSURE SBP > 90mmHg STABILITY PEAK INSPIRATORY 2 < 35cmH O PRESSURE (PIP) 2 BAROTRAUMA PLATEAU PRESSURE (P ) < 30cmH O PREVENTION PLAT 2 SAFETY SAFETY 3 AutoPEEP None VOLUTRAUMA Start Here TIDAL VOLUME (V ) ~ 6-8cc/kg IBW PREVENTION T Loss of AIRWAY Female ETT 7.0-7.5 AIRWAY / ETT / TRACH Patent Airway MAINTENANCE Male ETT 8.0-8.5 AIRWAY AIRWAY FiO2 21 - 100% PULSE OXIMETRY (SpO2) > 90% Hypoxia OXYGENATION 4 PEEP 5 [5-15] pO2 > 60mmHg 5’5” = 350cc [max 600] pCO2 40mmHg TIDAL 6’0” = 450cc [max 750] 5 VOLUME 6’5” = 500cc [max 850] ETCO2 45 Hypercapnia VENTILATION pH 7.4 GAS GAS EXCHANGE BPM (RR) 14 [10-30] GAS EXCHANGE MINUTE VENTILATION (VMIN) > 5L/min SYNCHRONY WORK OF BREATHING Decreased High Work ASSIST CONTROL MODE VOLUME or PRESSURE of Breathing PATIENT-VENTILATOR AC (V) / AC (P) 6 Comfortable Breaths (WOB) SUPPORT SYNCHRONY COMFORT COMFORT 2⁰ ASSESSMENT PATIENT CIRCUIT VENT Mental Status PIP RR, WOB Pulse, HR, Rhythm ETT/Trach Position Tidal Volume (V ) Trachea T Blood Pressure Secretions Minute Ventilation (V ) SpO MIN Skin Temp/Color 2 Connections Synchrony ETCO Cap Refill 2 Air-Trapping 1. Recognize Signs of Shock Work-up and Manage 2. Assess 6Ps If single problem Troubleshoot Cause 3. If Multiple Problems QUICK FIX Troubleshoot Cause(s) PROBLEMS ©2017 Mayo Clinic Foundation for Medical Education and Research CAUSES QUICK FIX MANAGEMENT Bleeding Hemostasis, Transfuse, Treat cause, Temperature control HYPOVOLEMIA Dehydration Fluid Resuscitation (End points = hypoxia, ↑StO2, ↓PVI) 3rd Spacing Treat cause, Beware of hypoxia (3rd spacing in lungs) Pneumothorax Needle D, Chest tube Abdominal Compartment Syndrome FLUID Treat Cause, Paralyze, Surgery (Open Abdomen) OBSTRUCTED BLOOD RETURN Air-Trapping (AutoPEEP) (if not hypoxic) Pop off vent & SEE SEPARATE CHART PEEP Reduce PEEP Cardiac Tamponade Pericardiocentesis, Drain.
    [Show full text]
  • Approach to Shock.” These Podcasts Are Designed to Give Medical Students an Overview of Key Topics in Pediatrics
    PedsCases Podcast Scripts This is a text version of a podcast from Pedscases.com on “Approach to Shock.” These podcasts are designed to give medical students an overview of key topics in pediatrics. The audio versions are accessible on iTunes or at www.pedcases.com/podcasts. Approach to Shock Developed by Dr. Dustin Jacobson and Dr Suzanne Beno for PedsCases.com. December 20, 2016 My name is Dustin Jacobson, a 3rd year pediatrics resident from the University of Toronto. This podcast was supervised by Dr. Suzanne Beno, a staff physician in the division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine at the University of Toronto. Today, we’ll discuss an approach to shock in children. First, we’ll define shock and understand it’s pathophysiology. Next, we’ll examine the subclassifications of shock. Last, we’ll review some basic and more advanced treatment for shock But first, let’s start with a case. Jonny is a 6-year-old male who presents with lethargy that is preceded by 2 days of a diarrheal illness. He has not urinated over the previous 24 hours. On assessment, he is tachycardic and hypotensive. He is febrile at 40 degrees Celsius, and is moaning on assessment, but spontaneously breathing. We’ll revisit this case including evaluation and management near the end of this podcast. The term “shock” is essentially a ‘catch-all’ phrase that refers to a state of inadequate oxygen or nutrient delivery for tissue metabolic demand. This broad definition incorporates many causes that eventually lead to this end-stage state. Basic oxygen delivery is determined by cardiac output and content of oxygen in the blood.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypothesis Spinal Shock and `Brain Death': Somatic Pathophysiological
    Spinal Cord (1999) 37, 313 ± 324 ã 1999 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Hypothesis Spinal shock and `brain death': Somatic pathophysiological equivalence and implications for the integrative-unity rationale DA Shewmon*,1 1Pediatric Neurology, UCLA Medical School, Los Angeles, California, USA The somatic pathophysiology of high spinal cord injury (SCI) not only is of interest in itself but also sheds light on one of the several rationales proposed for equating `brain death' (BD) with death, namely that the brain confers integrative unity upon the body, which would otherwise constitute a mere conglomeration of cells and tissues. Insofar as the neuropathology of BD includes infarction down to the foramen magnum, the somatic pathophysiology of BD should resemble that of cervico-medullary junction transection plus vagotomy. The endocrinologic aspects can be made comparable either by focusing on BD patients without diabetes insipidus or by supposing the victim of high SCI to have pre-existing therapeutically compensated diabetes insipidus. The respective literatures on intensive care for BD organ donors and high SCI corroborate that the two conditions are somatically virtually identical. If SCI victims are alive at the level of the `organism as a whole', then so must be BD patients (the only signi®cant dierence being consciousness). Comparison with SCI leads to the conclusion that if BD is to be equated with death, a more coherent reason must be adduced than that the body as a biological organism is dead. Keywords: brain death; spinal cord injury; spinal shock; integrative functions; somatic integrative unity; organism as a whole Introduction Spinal shock is a transient functional depression of the society; its legal de®nition is culturally relative, and structurally intact cord below a lesion, following acute most modern societies happen to have chosen to spinal cord injury (SCI).
    [Show full text]
  • Where Does Central Cord Syndrome Fit Into the Spinal Cord Injury Spectrum?
    Central cord syndrome Laura Snyder, MD FAANS Director of Neurotrauma Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeon Barrow Neurological InsAtute St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center Where does central cord syndrome fit into the spinal cord injury spectrum? Spinal Cord Injury • Complete • No preservaAon of any motor and/or sensory funcAon more than 3 segments below the level of injury in the absence of spinal shock • Incomplete • Some preservaAon of motor and/or sensory funcAon below level of injury including • Palpable or visible muscle contracAon • Perianal sensaAon • Voluntary anal contracAon Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury • Central cord syndrome • Anterior cord syndrome • Brown-Sequard syndrome • Posterior Cord Syndrome Spinal Cord Injury Epidemiology • 11,000 cases/year • 34% incomplete tetraplegia • Most common is Central Cord Syndrome • 11% incomplete paraplegia • 47% complete injuries The Cause • Most commonly acute hyperextension injury in older paAent with pre-exisAng acquired stenosis • Stenosis can be result of • Bony hypertrophy (anterior or posterior spurs) • Infolding of redundant ligamentum flavum posteriorly • Anterior disc bulge or herniaAon • Congenital spinal stenosis Abnormal Loading of Spinal Cord can cause Spinal Cord Injury Nerve Compression at Rest Combine pre-exisAng compression with hyperextension => Central Cord Syndrome Most Common PresentaAon • Blow to upper face or forehead • Forward fall (anyAme you see an elderly paAent with a fall in which they hit their head) • Motor Vehicle accident • SporAng injuries Pathomechanics
    [Show full text]