Walking and Cycling Creating a Continuous Journey from Werribee to the City
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
West Gate Tunnel Project GTA Review
21 August 2017 Title West Gate Tunnel Project Transport Expert Evidence #1John Kiriakidis – 22 August 2017 GTA Review (GTA Section 1.3) 1. Consider project’s strategic transport alignment with planning policy. 2. A peer review of analytics contained in the Transport Impact Assessment (TIAR) relied on to inform the EES in support of the Project. 3. Adoption of transport modelling forecasts prepared by VLC. #2 1 21 August 2017 GTA Strategic Alignment Methodology 1. Validate the transport challenges identified in the EES (and Business Case) which form the basis of need for the project by identifying their pre-existence in established policies and studies. 2. Review strategic planning policies to determine the extent of alignment with established policy and planning for Greater Melbourne, 3. Examine the EES as it relates to transport by exploring the project’s consistency with objectives set out in the Transport Integration Act (2010). #3 EES Project Scoping Objective EES Scoping Requirement (for Transport): • ‘To increase transport capacity and improve connectivity to and from the west of Melbourne, and, in particular, increase freight movement via the freeway network instead of local and arterial roads, while adequately managing the effects of the project on the broader and local road network, public transport, cycling and pedestrian transport networks’. • Key themes within the Objective: – Transport capacity – Improving connectivity (with emphasis on areas West of Melbourne) – Moving freight via a higher order road system – Adequately managing effects on public transport and active travel #4 2 21 August 2017 High Level Project Plan #5 Legislation / Policy Framework • The Transport Integration Act 2010 came into effect on 1 July 2010 and is Victoria's principal transport statute. -
Integrated Transport Plan
Integrated Transport Plan Background Paper i Background Paper January 2017 This background paper was compiled by Hobsons Bay City Council. For further information contact Council on 9932 1000 or at www.hobsonsbay.vic.gov.au Council acknowledges all language groups of the Kulin Nation as the traditional owners of these municipal lands. We recognise the first people’s relationship to this land and offer our respect to their elders past and present. Council also acknowledges the legal responsibility to comply with the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 and the Equal Opportunity Act 2010. ii Executive summary The purpose of this background paper is to present an evidence base to inform future integrated transport planning in Hobsons Bay. Background Council released the Hobsons Bay Integrated Transport Strategy in 2006. More recently, consultation has identified ‘access to transport’ as an ongoing issue, particularly in neighbourhoods with limited transport options and high car dependency. In response to these concerns, Council committed to commence the development of an Integrated Transport Plan in 2014, with the first step being to develop a background paper. This background paper reinforces the need for long term strategic planning to coordinate Hobsons Bay’s interrelated transport modes into an integrated system. This ‘network approach’ is underpinned by a sustainable transport hierarchy that prioritises active, public and freight transport, while encouraging reduced private car use. Integrated transport planning can -
Assessment of Transport Corridors 9
PaRt 3: assessment of tRansPoRt CoRRiDoRs 9. Regional Rail link (west of weRRibee to DeeR PaRk) The proposal for the Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park is being planned in an integrated manner with the changes to Melbourne’s Urban Growth Boundary, the Outer Metropolitan Ring / E6 Transport Corridor and the preservation of grasslands areas in Melbourne’s west. The Regional Rail Link can allow urban growth areas in Melbourne’s west to be served by high-quality public transport infrastructure early on in their development. It is of strategic importance to Victoria in achieving its wider transport planning vision as outlined in The Victorian Transport Plan and urban growth planning as outlined in Melbourne 2030 and Melbourne @ 5 million. 9.1 Understanding the Corridor The Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park is a 30 kilometre long section of up to 50 kilometres of the rail project linking the Melbourne-Geelong railway west of Werribee to Southern Cross Station via the Melbourne-Ballarat railway, connecting at Deer Park. The other section of the Regional Rail Link uses the existing rail corridors between Southern Cross Station and Deer Park. Both sections of the overall Regional Rail Link can be developed independently of each other, although both are proposed to be developed together to reduce construction times and ensure overall project benefits are realised as early as possible. 9.2 assessment The selection and assessment process to determine the alignment for the Regional Rail Link – west of Werribee to Deer Park involved: > Preparing route concepts to identify a broad range of options considering engineering constraints and benefits. -
Discover Brimbank
Brimbank Brimbank which is linked to Sunshine by the Cannon Street footbridge. footbridge. Street Cannon the by Sunshine to linked is which crosses the highway into other areas of Taylors Lakes. Lakes. Taylors of areas other into highway the crosses city. the to way the all – kilometres many for followed trails Discover Davitt Drive Reserve, Selwyn Park and Buckingham Reserve, Reserve, Buckingham and Park Selwyn Reserve, Drive Davitt playground to the Watergardens Town Centre and then then and Centre Town Watergardens the to playground be can trail This more. and centre visitor’s playgrounds, parks and and parks be accessed along the trail including Station Waters Park, Park, Waters Station including trail the along accessed be Lakes. The trail then winds its way past Rutherglen Way Way Rutherglen past way its winds then trail The Lakes. barbecues, including offer on facilities many the of Deer Park and the Western Ring Road Trail in coming years. coming in Trail Road Ring Western the and Park Deer Black Powder Mill and natural rock pools. Many parks can can parks Many pools. rock natural and Mill Powder Black Crescent, Keilor and through The Lakes Reserve in Taylors Taylors in Reserve Lakes The through and Keilor Crescent, advantage take and River Maribyrnong the along pathway This trail will be extended to the Kororoit Creek Trail in in Trail Creek Kororoit the to extended be will trail This Brimbank’s Brimbank’s natural and cultural gems along the creek, including the the including creek, the along gems cultural and natural remnants of ancient lava flows to parkland in Burrowye Burrowye in parkland to flows lava ancient of remnants the Follow fitness. -
Wyndham Pedestrian & Cycle Strategy
dd Wyndham Pedestrian & Cycle Strategy Cyclist Feedback, Identified network expansion requirements and missing links Wyndham City Council has received a great deal of feedback on cycling within the municipality. The identified issues were considered in writing the 2019 Pedestrian and Cycling Strategy. The feedback has been grouped under common categories in the tables below, to keep like comments together. Table-1 Safety and Blackspot feedback Location Type Comment Derrimut Road Crossing Points crossings at Sayers and Leakes Roads – but I believe these are going to be dealt with by VicRoads Cycle lane Cycle lane on the Eastern side is in one direction only. It’s a busy Derrimut Road road so lanes on both sides of the road need to be two way. Also, going under the railway bridge near the Princess Highway Obstacles There are many obstacles within the shared paths – e.g. Derrimut SUP Road, adjacent to Aqualink – a no standing sign (I think) way too close to the middle of the Shared path. Cyclists could easily crash into it; Cnr Derrimut Road and Willmott Cres – many signs Derrimut Road obstructing the path – traffic lights, bike path sign (!!), no standing or something. Not at all safe. Also a shared path sign on cnr of Kookaburra and Derrimut – in middle of path instead of off to the side. Kookaburra Ave Cycle Path Paths on Kookaburra Ave have speed cushions in them. At night Obstacles they are invisible (even with bicycle lights). No need – could have treatment similar to Shaw’s Road. Also path disappears before T intersection with Derrimut Road. -
Moreland Pre-Contact Aboriginal Heritage Study (The Study)
THE CITY OF MORELAND Pre-ContactP AboriginalRECONTA HeritageCT Study 2010 ABORIGINAL HERITAGE STUDY THE CITY OF MORELAND PRECONTACT ABORIGINAL HERITAGE STUDY Prepared for The City of Moreland ������������������ February 2005 Prepared for The City of Moreland ������������������ February 2005 Suite 3, 83 Station Street FAIRFIELD MELBOURNE 3078 Phone: (03) 9486 4524 1243 Fax: (03) 9481 2078 Suite 3, 83 Station Street FAIRFIELD MELBOURNE 3078 Phone: (03) 9486 4524 1243 Fax: (03) 9481 2078 Acknowledgement Acknowledgement of traditional owners Moreland City Council acknowledges Moreland as being on the traditional lands of the Wurundjeri people. Council pays its respects to the Wurundjeri people and their Elders, past and present. The Wurundjeri Tribe Land Council, as the Registered Aboriginal Party (RAP) and the Traditional Owners for the whole of the Moreland City Council area, should be the first point of contact for any future enquiries, reports, events or similar that include any Pre-contact Aboriginal information. Statement of committment (Taken from the Moreland Reconciliation Policy and Action Plan 2008-2012) Moreland City Council gives its support to the Australian Declaration Towards Reconciliation 2000 and the National Apology to the Stolen Generations by the Australian Parliament 13 February 2008. It makes the following Statement of Commitment to Indigenous People. Council recognises • That Indigenous Australians were the first people of this land. • That the Wurundjeri are the traditional owners of country now called Moreland. • The centrality of Indigenous issues to Australian identity. • That social and cultural dispossession has caused the current disadvantages experienced by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. • That Indigenous people have lost their land, their children, their health and their lives and regrets these losses. -
Kororoit Creek Regional Park
Kororoit Creek Regional Park Planning Report – 2018 Kororoit Creek Regional Park Planning Report - September 2017 Acknowledgements DELWP would like to thank Parks Victoria, the Victorian Planning Authority and Melbourne Water for their input into the preparation of this report. Author Sarah Auld, Auld Planning & Projects Editor Vanessa Pearse, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning DRAFT © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2018 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. Accessibility If you would like to receive this publication in an alternative format, please telephone the DELWP Customer Service Centre on 136186, email [email protected], or via the National Relay Service on 133 677 www.relayservice.com.au. This document is also available on the internet at www.delwp.vic.gov.au. -
Wyndham Cycle Strategy – Cyclist Feedback
Wyndham Cycle Strategy – Cyclist Feedback We have received a great deal of feedback already on cycling within Wyndham. We have considered these items when writing the strategy so far and will include them in an appendix contained in the final version of the Strategy. The appendix list will inform Wyndham City’s future infrastructure planning and capital works budgets, and any advocacy to State and Federal Governments for cycle infrastructure funding. We have included this list so that all involved in the consultation know what other community members have provided as well as what is being considered as input into the strategy. The responses have been grouped under common categories to keep like comments together. Safety/Blackspots Comments include: If it felt safer to ride - the traffic is extremely scary, sometimes. I prefer to have dedicated bicycle only or shared paths for safety reasons and for a relaxed enjoyable ride. I believe more people will be into cycling in Wyndham Vale if such dedicated bike trials exists. Tarneit Rd – at some points the cycle path is in service roads, and cyclists who are travelling straight ahead inexplicably have to give way to motorists who are turning left. Derrimut Rd – crossings at Sayers and Leakes Roads – but I believe these are going to be dealt with by VicRoads Derrimut Rd – Cycle lane on the Eastern side is in one direction only. It’s a busy road so lanes on both sides of the road need to be two way. Also, going under the railway bridge near Princes Hwy – the shared path is almost unusable and frequently covered in glass. -
Kororoit Creek Upper
Kororoit Creek Upper Summary Key stakeholders - Melton Council was involved and Melbourne Water Took time to orientate ourselves Rural dominated management unit - what's the nest way of including privates landholders? Outside of UBG Lengthy discussion about whether PO's were applicable Quite a discussion about private wetland - is there enough protections/guidance for subdivisions e.g. setback of septics etc. ID Performance Objectives (preliminary) Who's in? PO1 Target three areas (min. 2 ha) for habitat improvement for Bibron's Toadlet. PO2 Increase the length of continuous riparian vegetation from 12% to 18% (approximately 9 kilometres) from the headwaters at Mt Aitken to Plumpton. PO3 Increase participation rates in capacity building and citizen science programs from moderate to high Enviro groups (local groups) - refer to Melton for info. Schools. Landholders/farmers. PO4 High priority Low Flow Dependent Ecosystems are managed as guided by the Low Flow Dependent Ecosystem Plan to protect and maintain them in the landscape Add in PO Perhaps include something about wetland protection Add in PO Collect data on birds Enviro groups . Citizen Science Add in PO Farming practices e.g. nutrient runoff Comments on PO's PO1 "2ha per site or 2ha total across three sites?" "What’s habitat?" PO1 Is [Bibron's Toadlet] currently in the area? Area we focussing on improving condition and habitat? Why focussing on Bibron's in this area? Not GGF? PO2 Opportunities for linking important areas with reveg. For what purpose? Is there opportunities for access by community? PO2 Is 12% current state? Need an understanding of land tenure. -
John Kiriakidis– Curriculum Vitae B: Matters Raised by PPV Guide to Expert Evidence C: West Gate Tunnel Active Transport
1. West Gate Tunnel Project 2. Traffic and Transport Review Expert Evidence Statement Expert Witness: 3. John TrafficKiriakidis and Transport Review Client: Western Distributor Authority Instructed by: Clayton Utz Lawyers Reference: V131660 Hearing Date: 14/08/2017 Report Date: 02/08/17 West Gate Tunnel Project Expert Evidence Statement Traffic and Transport Review Issue: 02/08/17 Client: Western Distributor Authority Reference: V131660 GTA Consultants Office: VIC ) © GTA Consultants (GTA Consultants (VIC) Pty Ltd) 2017 The information contained in this document is confidential and intended solely for the use of the client for the purpose for which it has 150630 v2.6 150630 ( been prepared and no representation is made or is to be implied as being made to any third party. Use or copying of this document in Melbourne | Sydney | Brisbane whole or in part without the written permission of GTA Consultants Canberra | Adelaide | Perth constitutes an infringement of copyright. The intellectual property VCAT Evidence VCAT Gold Coast | Townsville contained in this document remains the property of GTA Consultants. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Qualifications and Experience 1 1.3 Report Scope 1 1.4 References 2 1.5 Assessment Methodology Context 3 1.6 Statement on Findings 3 1.6.1 Overview 3 1.6.2 Strategic Alignment with Policy / Strategy 3 1.6.3 Project Position 5 1.7 Tests, Experiments & Assistance 5 2. Project Background & Review Context 6 2.1 Project Proposal 6 3. Legislation and Policy Framework 9 3.1 Preamble 9 3.1.1 Social and Economic Inclusion 10 3.1.2 Economic Prosperity 10 3.1.3 Environmental Sustainability 11 3.1.4 Integration of Transport and Land Use 12 3.1.5 Efficiency, Coordination and Reliability 12 3.1.6 Safety, Health and Wellbeing 12 3.1.7 Summary of Objectives 13 3.2 State Planning Policy Framework 13 3.3 Other Strategies and Policies 14 4. -
The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank
The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation By .Craig Dflidson and::: • Colin Hoc] re,2004) t^f.tij;" [tj i > VICTIiRIA UNIVERSITY OF T|CHNOLO iY 3 0001 00853 0182 FTS THESIS 333.954 160994 DOD ii'-'The Birds and Reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web; Brimbank: Scoping the Requirements for Conservation" By Craig Dodson Supervisor: Dr. Colin Hocking A thesis submitted to the Sustainability Group (Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology) as part of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science (Honours) Victoria University (June 2004) THESIS 333.954160994 DOD 30001008530182 Dodson, Craig The birds and reptiles of the Iramoo Green Web, Brimbank : scoping the DECLARATION This document does not contain any material that has been accepted for any reward of any other degree or diploma in any university and to the best of my knowledge, no other material that has previously been published or written by any other person is contained in this document accept where referenced in the text. Craig Dodson n AKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Dr. Colin Hocking for his guidance and encouragement during the formation of my honours jjroject and thesis and a special thanks goes to the Honours Coordinator Associate Professor Paul Boon for his patience in waiting for this thesis. Thanks goes also to the post-graduate students David Steart and Mark Scarr for their help and support in the formation of my thesis and with technical assistance on the computer. My fellow honour students Carolyn Burrell and Lucy Cassar, thank you for your support, technical assistance and friendship during my honours year. -
Shared Paths
Shared paths – the issues They [cyclists] go ‘whoosh’ as they go past, and often the “ paths aren’t very wide, so this notion that you have to share has to come with more thought. If there’s not enough room it’s not a good match. If it’s got to be shared it’s got to be wider. Or separation between them.” Quote from focus groups with Victorian seniors (Garrard 2013) Thank You Victoria Walks would like to acknowledge and thank the following organisations who provided source information and feedback on the initial draft of this paper. • CDM Research • Frankston City Council • Wyndham City Council • Malcolm Daff Consulting • City of Yarra • Cardinia City Council Victoria Walks would also like to thank Dr Jan Garrard, VicRoads and officers from the following councils, who provided comment on the draft – Ballarat, Bayside, Boroondara, Brimbank, Dandenong, Latrobe, Macedon Ranges, Manningham, Maroondah, Melton, Moonee Valley, Mornington Peninsula, Nillumbik and Surf Coast. Finally, Victoria Walks would like to thank the Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) for facilitating engagement with councils. Acknowledgement of these organisations should not be implied as endorsement of this paper and its recommendations by any of the organisations named. Shared Paths – the issues. Version 3.1, May 2015 ©Victoria Walks Inc. Registration No. A0052693U Recommended citation Victoria Walks (2015). Shared paths – the issues, Melbourne, Victoria Walks. Shared paths – the issues Outline This paper considers issues around shared walking and cycling paths. It reviews the literature relating to: • The safety of shared paths, including collision risk, the speed of cyclists and potential impact on pedestrians • User perception of shared paths • The circumstances where walking and cycling paths should be segregated or separated • International and local design guidance around shared paths • The practice of converting footpaths to shared paths • Legal liability issues raised by shared paths.