Grant Program Profile
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Inter-American Foundation An Independent Agency of the U.S. Government FISCAL YEAR 2011 ANNUAL GRANT RESULTS REPORT _____________________________________________________________________________ Cover: Fundación Taigüey purchases fruit for processing into value-added products such as jams and jellies to sell in Dominican niche markets. Photo: Jenny Petrow TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 4 THE IAF and GRASSROOTS DEVELOPMENT ................................................................. 6 THIS REPORT and the GRASSROOTS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ................... 6 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................... 7 How Does the GDF Work?................................................................................................... 7 Measuring Results................................................................................................................. 8 GRANT PROGRAM PROFILE .............................................................................................. 9 RESULTS ................................................................................................................................... 9 Individuals and Families: Tangible Indicators ................................................................ 11 Training ........................................................................................................................... 11 Job-Creation.................................................................................................................... 12 Food Production/Nutrition............................................................................................. 14 Housing ............................................................................................................................ 14 Health............................................................................................................................... 15 Individuals and Families: Intangible Indicators.............................................................. 15 Self-esteem ....................................................................................................................... 15 Cultural Identity ............................................................................................................. 16 Leadership ....................................................................................................................... 16 Organizations: Tangible Indicators .................................................................................. 17 Management .................................................................................................................... 17 Resource Leveraging ...................................................................................................... 18 Dissemination .................................................................................................................. 19 Organizations: Intangible Indicators................................................................................ 20 Access to Information..................................................................................................... 20 Participatory Decision-Making...................................................................................... 20 Communities and Societies: Tangible Indicators ............................................................ 21 Wider Application of Methods and Techniques .......................................................... 21 Participatory Consultation............................................................................................. 22 Communities and Societies: Intangible Indicators .......................................................... 22 Treatment of Vulnerable Populations........................................................................... 22 GRANTEE INITIATIVES AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ................................ 24 EXPANDING THE REACH OF THE IAF’S APPROACH: RedEAmérica ............................ 26 POST-GRANT ASSESSMENTS............................................................................................ 30 APPENDIX A – GRASSROOTS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK .............................. 32 APPENDIX B – GRANTS THROUGHOUT LATIN AMERICA ..................................... 33 APPENDIX C – ORGANIZATIONS REFERENCED IN THIS REPORT ...................... 34 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summarizes the results reported Because each grantee reports on only by 243 grantees of the Inter-American selected indicators, the numbers presented in Foundation (IAF) that were active in fiscal this report understate the results of the IAF’s 2011. The results of their work benefited investments. more than 91,300 men and women, including African descendants, indigenous Individuals and Families people, persons with disabilities and disadvantaged women and youths, providing Indicators such as knowledge and skills opportunities for these historically-excluded acquired and applied, satisfaction of basic groups to participate more fully in economic needs (shelter, food, health) and job-creation and civic life. measure the effectiveness of grant-funded activities. Taken together, these indicators Results were gathered using the document better conditions for beneficiaries Grassroots Development Framework and participation in the development (GDF), a practical tool developed by the process. Highlights of results reported in IAF to assess the progress made by a fiscal 2011 include the following: diverse portfolio of grantees toward a broad array of goals. Balancing a focus More than 48,300 individuals acquired on results with the level of effort and knowledge and skills through IAF- cost involved in gathering funded training: 14,131 individuals were comprehensive data, the IAF requires trained in agriculture; 43,401 in civic each grantee to choose several indicators participation; 26,511 in human rights; from a menu of 41 to track, analyze, and 9,420 in manufacturing skills; 7,485 in document their results and report to the finance; 7,655 in conservation; and IAF every six months. Reports are 5,537 in leadership skills. Many verified independently by individuals participants enrolled in multiple training contracted locally who also help develop sessions covering various topics. the capacity of grantee organizations to Grantees also track the application of the track results. The GDF measures the knowledge and skills acquired. tangible results of their projects, as well as the subtler, no less vital, intangible Approximately 5,500 new jobs were effects, such as the development of created as a result of training, technical leadership or self-confidence, that might assistance and credit programs; 2,065 affect current and future initiatives. positions were saved; and working conditions improved relevant to 2,162 Results are collected on three levels: the jobs. individual and family, through better quality of life; the organization, through stronger More than 9,125 individuals benefited grassroots groups and organizations that from access to medical care and support them; and the community and sanitation services and from diversified society, through changing policies, practices food production. Clinics provided and attitudes. (For an illustration of the services to 322 individuals; nearly 720 GDF, see Appendix A). individuals gained access to clean water; 4 and close to 8,000 people now enjoy a a result of the IAF’s funding and more nutritious diet. involvement over time, hundreds of thousands of individuals in thousands of Organizations communities throughout Latin America and the Caribbean have improved their lives and An organizational culture that results in circumstances. greater engagement in democratic practices is measured by such indicators as access to Nongovernmental organizations, information and participation in decision- including IAF grantees, and government making. Organizational capacity is entities replicated successful methods measured using indicators that include and practices. resources mobilized and the dissemination of experiences and practices. As with the IAF grantees have supported abilities of an individual, organizational communities in their efforts to have a capacity contributes to future sustainability voice in matters that affect them. For of initiatives. example, subgrants enabled diverse groups of indigenous Brazilians along Grantees collaborated with 541 new the Xingu River to work together during partners and maintained relations with the public debates on a new dam. This more than 1,600 organizations, which resulted in strategies to mitigate flooding enabled them to mobilize additional from the infrastructure project and resources and exchange experiences. policies to compensate damage to property and to the habitat that their The IAF’s responsive, results-oriented livelihoods depend on. approach continues to attract new sources of support for grassroots These and other results in fiscal 2011 development. In 2011, IAF grantees confirm the IAF’s success in promoting mobilized resources valued at more than economic opportunity, reducing poverty and $2.7 million beyond their required fostering civic engagement at the counterpart commitments. community level. Fifty percent of all grantees formally Sandra Lafontaine shared their knowledge with beneficiaries,