Changes in Navy Leadership Theory and Practice: Post-Vietnam

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changes in Navy Leadership Theory and Practice: Post-Vietnam University of San Diego Digital USD Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2001 Changes in Navy Leadership Theory and Practice: Post-Vietnam Nicholas A. Trongale EdD University of San Diego Follow this and additional works at: https://digital.sandiego.edu/dissertations Part of the Leadership Studies Commons Digital USD Citation Trongale, Nicholas A. EdD, "Changes in Navy Leadership Theory and Practice: Post-Vietnam" (2001). Dissertations. 684. https://digital.sandiego.edu/dissertations/684 This Dissertation: Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Digital USD. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital USD. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Changes in Leadership Theory CHANGES IN NAVY LEADERSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE: POST-VIETNAM by Nicholas A. Trongale A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education University of San Diego 2001 Dissertation Committee Mary Scherr, Ph.D., Director Fred Galloway, Ed.D. Daniel Miller, Ph.D. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory ABSTRACT CHANGES IN NAVY LEADERSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE: POST-VIETNAM Since the Vietnam War, Navy leadership theory and practice has changed, becoming more like current civilian leadership theory and practice than traditional military leadership of old. Indicators of this alteration have been seen in journal writings, the new Navy performance evaluation structure, current Navy leadership training, and by the birth of a Navy Command Leadership School. This study was designed to explore the evolution and recent history of the Navy’s leadership theory and practice for indications of change. Combining a qualitative and quantitative methodology, this study used a 5-point Likert-type scale survey that included a written comments section. Over 70 % of 561 participants responded to the survey’s open-ended questions, adding explanatory power to the quantitative data. The findings in this study show that Tailhook was viewed as a major event associated with the changes in Navy leadership since the Vietnam War. Of the two participant groups surveyed, Vietnam-era and post-Vietnam Navy officers and senior enlisted veterans, Vietnam-era aviators felt the strongest in this belief. Vietnam-era veterans believed that the change had not been for the good of the Navy, whereas active duty personnel were much more favorable in their assessment about changes in leadership. Women showed significantly greater agreement that change in Navy leadership theory and practice during their time on active duty was for the good of the Navy, and whites iii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory expressed a more favorable attitude to the direction Navy leadership was taking than non­ whites. Other contributors to change in Navy leadership since Vietnam were the post-CoId War force drawdown and technological advacements of the 1990s. Changes in Navy leadership were perceived differently depending on participants’ race, gender, or rank— usually only varying in degree of agreement or disagreement with certain aspects of Navy leadership. What started as a gradual change in Navy leadership theory and practice accelerated after the 1991 Tailhook Convention scandal. Tailhook was a watershed event that sent shock waves throughout the Navy hierarchy. The event and its aftermath forced the Navy to change how it viewed the role of women in combat. To some, Tailhook represented a quintessential breakdown in Navy leadership. TV Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory © Copyright by NICHOLAS A TRONGALE 2001 V Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory Dedication To my wife Kate, my children Danny and Megan, and my mother for their love and support, and to the United States Navy for 21 fantastic years filled with opportunity and challenge. vi Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory Preface I would like to acknowledge and thank my dissertation director, Dr. Mary Scherr, PhD., and my dissertation committee members, Dr. Fred Galloway, Ed.D., and Dr. Daniel Miller, PhD., for their expert guidance throughout tny pursuit o f this doctoral degree, and for their understanding of the scope of my primary job and constraints 1 was living under in the Pacific Northwest and being out to sea for the majority o f this dissertation process. Without their help and support I still would be trying to complete this dissertation. I would also like to thank Dean Paula Cordeiro, Ed.D., for her help and counsel during my studies at the University of San Diego; Dr. Janet Littrell, EdJD., who was instrumental in starting me off in the right direction in the leadership program by supporting a studies template that did not look achievable to anyone but us; Dr. William Howe, EH, PhD., for his mentoring, and for his ability to meld teaching leadership with practicing it; to Dr. Marie Thomas, PhD., for her immensely valuable analytical assistance in this study; and to Bev Callaway for her ability to merge the myriad of elements necessary to form a dissertation. I would also like to thank Sr. Terri Monroe, RSCJ, for all her support and interest in this study; those members o f the United States Navy, past and present, who participated in the survey, particularly the Vietnam-era veterans who had the courage to tell it like they saw it, and in many cases, signed their name to their comments. Lastly, I would like to vii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory thank the countless other individuals who assisted me during my pursuit of this epic undertaking—individuals that I cannot mention by name and still ensure anonymity. viii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Changes in Leadership Theory TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE CHANGES IN NAVY LEADERSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE: POST-VIETNAM.........................................................................................................I The Problem............................................................................................................... 5 The 1991 Tailhook ScandaL .................................. 5 Post-Cold War Drawdown. ............................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Study .................................................................................................11 Research Questions ...................................................................................................II Significance of the Study .......................................................................................... 11 Methodology .............................................................................................................12 Study Objectives ........................................................................................................ 13 Discussion of Terms Used in the Study .....................................................................13 CHAPTER TWO REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE........................................... 17 Civilian Leadership Theory ....................................................................................... 17 Military Leadership Theory ....................................................................................... 19 Practical Applications of Leadership Theory ............................................................ 24 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY.......................................................................... 27 Introduction. ............................................................................................................. 27 Research Questions and Design Overview. ............................................................... 27 Survey Instrument Development .............................................................................. 28 Pilot Interviews. ............................................................................................... 29 Survey. ............................................................................................................ 33 Survey Reliability. ............................................................................................ 34 Triangulation Methodology and Survey Participants ....................................... 35 Non-response Bias ............................................................................................41 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................ 42 Ethical Considerations: The Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.45 Entry, Access, and Document Collection. ........................................................45 Limitations ............................................................................................................... 46 Role of the Researcher.............................................................................................. 47 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS..........................................................................................48
Recommended publications
  • Naval Postgraduate School Annual Report 2011 “This Is a Special Place for Me
    Naval Postgraduate School Annual Report 2011 “THIS IS A SPECIAL PLACE FOR ME. AND IN MANY WAYS, IT’s COMING HOME. I AM VERY PROUD OF THE NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL … PROUD OF ITS MISSION AND PROUD OF ITS DEDICATION TO PROTECTING THIS COUNTRY.” The Honorable Leon Panetta U.S. Secretary of Defense August 23, 2011 he mission of the Naval Postgraduate School is to provide high- Tquality, relevant and unique advanced education and research programs that increase the combat effectiveness of the Naval services, other Armed Forces of the U.S. and our partners, to enhance our national security. Annual Report 2011 2011 NPS ANNUAL REPORT 3 AGILE TRANSFORMATIONAL COLLEGIAL RELEVANT 4 2011 NPS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 NPS ANNUAL REPORT 5 INNOVATIVE FLEXIBLE VALUED STRATEGIC 6 2011 NPS ANNUAL REPORT 2011 NPS ANNUAL REPORT 7 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE PROVOST’S MESSAGE Capturing the essence of the Naval Postgraduate Throughout my more than 30 years in academia, School with just a few powerful words on the I have held firm to a handful of invaluable truths introductory pages of this report is a challenging and guiding principles that are paramount to the task. And sensibly so, for I can think of no other execution of education at any collegiate level. place where the rigor and purpose of military culture have been so intimately intertwined with classic, Perhaps at the top of this list is the undeniable fact high-level academia. that your educational programs are only as powerful as the faculty who teach them. Regardless of subject, So many of our programs are educational offerings ultimately, it is our faculty who are the masters of unlike any others in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • INE C N P MAGAZINE a N a O I
    IN RE M H I G A P I U N P F M IN RE N E B E O A I R N . D RO S O R N T E I D M P E N E T T N . V R T E N U I A L H E H F W H C NT H MOT A O C R C G I O E C E O I L E N O S I E T E O N N O E F D W A M A N M I G Y E F E M I A H G T U M M E I T N N S I E O - T E M A L H T M L I M o E N I N A P E T R N D E N H L I O T S T I N a I m G L O E M T P E L T L N O T S K G I T A w A - N O E M I R N I N e R E R N o E W U S S T Z S I D G E N - 2 D A N D E l O d M C R R Y A T R E A O I EN N D O O 0 T M E I a V U C N G L e I S L S T E M E A O D C 1 E n I T F N D S D O u l E T T L T N A I O F 2 I N A M Y U E S n E C E S O d S N E T l A E N – RR H T N A A N Y S O G U S G C S f R N I E F E t - O T I T O R M v 2 S G F R D T F T N S o E B i - I H R C S R F V i N E M A Y 0 E I E S A - O T E S I O A H e A K r E A T W R H S E E U R A 1 S O N I I M G D A Y N R F T S G E w c I S E A E C e E 7 E R O L N O R O F A Y P C M C E E S T E I E A D G I - e H E S N c A Y S P e R W I S M L O N T E Q L E A N N N A D M R C O T J R m L C u A S I S R a O C E - M O E G P U G E G Y S L T C T E O A R Y D A U R S T T o C r O , E A r M e F o R N T O P S S I S T H E u I a T N L E P Y P A u H F I H L S H i V n n N S A F I E G R T O A I E N I ty E T A e C C I E A R J n P S N I - O T E E T E T t I t A N A Y L N N N A O , T n T a T R F G E N N P R G t O I p F G L M I r T RE C I S E I D H r I C A E O S c P P T F N R A e N E C A N R T O E B I t I I I o E C N I A T A n C N E O A S N N h T M T S O L r G C O G N A C S I N E A i G AD A R g E l E U L N e A H - m C H G H F S M t N T O A - R R
    [Show full text]
  • Supply Corps Senior Leadership
    JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2017 Supply Corps Senior Leadership Happy New Year! As we begin 2017, I am optimistic that we will build on the many successes of 2016, and that we are well-positioned as a community to meet the challenges and leverage the opportunities ahead of us. One of the ways in which we are so well-posi- tioned is the strength of our team, and it is my pleasure to introduce our new Command Master Chief, Thaddeus T. Wright, who joined NAVSUP on November 2, 2016. Master A Message from the Chief Wright brings a wealth of knowledge and experience to the command and the Chief of Supply Corps enlisted community, as well as a fresh, new perspective to the NAVSUP team. This edition of the Supply Corps Newsletter features articles from the Supply Corps Senior Leadership Symposium held in Leesburg, Virginia, in November 2016. Flag Officers, Senior Executive Service members, Captains, and Captain-selects met to review the current state of our community, explore key initiatives, and prepare for 2017 and beyond. Topics such as our alignment with the Navy’s Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority, how we plan and execute in support of the full range of military operations, the role of mentor- ship in our community, and the increasing scope of our expeditionary support, highlight not only how our supply community is evolving, but also how our mission of providing world class supplies, services, and quality of life support to the warfighter is ever-enduring. Whether you are or may one day be part of our Reserve Component or FTS Supply Corps team, I encourage you to attend the upcoming National RC Supply Corps Sympo- sium in Dallas, Texas, May 20 and 21.
    [Show full text]
  • “It's Time to Act”
    ® Serving the Hampton Roads Navy Family Vol. 18, No. 24, Norfolk, VA FLAGSHIPNEWS.COM June 17, 2010 SECNAV discusses future of alternative energy BY MC1 DOUG KIMSEY es in supporting the nation’s key Naval War College Public Affairs objectives. The two-day forum is hosted annually by SECNAV. NEWPORT, R.I. — The sec- “It’s a matter of making sure retary of the Navy (SECNAV) that when we need those ships at ay Mabus shared his vision of a sea, when we need those aircraft greener Navy and Marine Corps in the air, when we need the Ma- team, one that is more energy in- rines on the ground, we have the dependent, but still remaining energy produced right here in the greatest maritime force in the the United States to do that,” said world, during a keynote address Mabus. at the Naval War College’s 61st Mabus, a former governor of Current Strategy Forum in New- Mississippi, U.S. Ambassador to port, R.I., June 9. Saudi Arabia and surface warfare “It’s a matter of energy inde- offi cer, gave examples of efforts pendence, it’s a matter of our to become less dependent on for- security,” said Mabus of the need eign fossil fuels. for the Navy and Marine Corps “In April, we fl ew the Green to reduce dependence on foreign Hornet, an F-18 Hornet. The fossil fuels. Green Hornet, a regular off-the- Attended by more than 1,200 shelf F-18, supersonic, fl ew on a participants, the 2010 confer- mixture of regular gasoline and ence explored the theme of “The biofuel, biofuel made from came- Global System in Transition” lina,” said Mabus.
    [Show full text]
  • US Navy Supply Corps
    SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2017 SUPPOs Supplying the Fight A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps Recognizing the central importance of supply to establishing the Navy, President George Washington laid the foundation for the U.S. Navy Supply Corps in 1775 with the appointment of Tench Francis, a Philadelphia businessman, as the country’s first Purveyor of Public Supplies. Francis provided vital support to the first Navy ships, and started our tradition of selfless service. The Navy’s trusted providers of supplies, our supply officers (SUPPOs) keep operations running smoothly to support the mission. But they can’t do it alone. Working as a team with their skilled and experienced enlisted members, our SUPPOs are experts in our field who know inventory and financial management, food, retail, postal operations, and disbursing management. They are leaders and problem solvers who tackle complex challenges to implement effective and efficient management solutions, ensuring our customers’ needs are met. To be “Ready for Sea,” we must be professionally ready with the skills to operate in all our lines of operation. We also need character readiness, demonstrated by our integrity, accountabili- ty, initiative, and toughness. Lastly, we need to be individually ready; to be fit, healthy, and ready to meet the demands of the fight. This issue provides insights from our SUPPOs’ important work as they meet the unique needs of their various commands. Like the pursuers and paymasters who have gone before, SUPPOs uphold our rich heritage, and embrace their responsibilities to support the warfighter with a servant’s heart. Our SUPPO’s success depends on their character and competence, knowledge of the shore infrastructure, relationships with our professional civilian workforce, and on the enlisted members they lead and serve with.
    [Show full text]
  • A M E R I C A's a M E R I C
    AMERICA’S TEAM A Report on the Relationship Between the Media and the Military FRANK AUKOFER WILLIAM P.LAWRENCE Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Vice Admiral, U.S.Navy, Retired AMERICA’S TEAM AMERICA’S TEAM A Report on the Relationship Between the Media and the Military FRANK AUKOFER WILLIAM P.LAWRENCE Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Vice Admiral, U.S.Navy, Retired Foreword i Dedicated to the memory of Les Aspin 1938-1995 Secretary of Defense Chairman, House Armed Services Commmittee ii America’s Team: The Odd Couple America’s Team; The Odd Couple— A Report on the Relationship Between the Media and the Military By Frank Aukofer and William P. Lawrence © 1995. The Freedom Forum First Amendment Center 1207 18th Avenue South Nashville, TN 37212 website: http://www.fac.org Publication number: 95-FO4 First Printing: September 1995 Second Printing: October 1995 Foreword iii Contents Foreword . v Introduction . vii PART I: OVERVIEW 1. Executive Summary . 3 2. Coverage of the Persian Gulf War . 9 3. Information Security and Military Culture . 23 4. The Military and the News Media: A Survey . 29 5. The First Two Centuries . 35 6. Grenada to Desert Storm: The Relationship Sours . 43 7. Legal Aspects of the Military-Media Relationship . 47 PART II: FOR THE FUTURE 8. Recommendations . 53 9. The Independent Coverage Tier Concept . 57 10. Can the News Media Be Trusted? . 63 11. News Media Education: Smart and Smarter, or Dumb and Dumber? 71 12. Military Education: Changes in Attitude . 79 13. Conclusion: Tweedledum or Tweedledee? . 85 PART III: OTHER VIEWS 14. Interview Excerpts . 89 Appendix I: Survey Results and Methodology .
    [Show full text]
  • Military Sex Scandals from Tailhook to the Present: the Cure Can Be Worse Than the Disease
    02__BROWNE.DOC 6/18/2007 3:00 PM MILITARY SEX SCANDALS FROM TAILHOOK TO THE PRESENT: THE CURE CAN BE WORSE THAN THE DISEASE KINGSLEY R. BROWNE* INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................750 I. TAILHOOK .............................................................................................................750 A. The Reaction .................................................................................................752 B. The Pentagon Inspector General’s Investigation.....................................753 C. The Navy Prosecutions ...............................................................................754 1. Paula Coughlin: The Victim’s Face.........................................................754 2. Cole Cowden and Elizabeth Warnick ......................................................756 3. Robert Stumpf .........................................................................................757 4. Other Victims of Prosecutorial Overreaching.........................................758 D. The End Result of the Navy Process .........................................................760 E. Unlawful Command Influence ..................................................................762 II. BEYOND TAILHOOK...............................................................................................764 A. The Navy in the Aftermath of Tailhook....................................................764 B. The Coast Guard, Too .................................................................................768
    [Show full text]
  • 37Th Annual Disability Awards Ceremony
    2017 Secretary of Defense Awards for Achievement in the Employment of Individuals with Disabilities and 2017 Secretary of Defense Award for Achievements in Ensuring Accessible Information and Communication Technology in the Workplace Introduction In honor of the 2017 National Disability Employment Awareness Month Five Department of Defense (DoD) Components and Military Departments will be honored for their exemplary practices in employing individuals with disabilities. Four awards recognize achievements in (NDEAM), the Department of Defense is proud to recognize this year’s programs and practices promoting hiring, retention, and advancement of individuals with disabilities. th Since 2010 this has included recognizing a DoD Component in the Intelligence Community. The recipients of the Secretary of Defense Awards at the 37 Annual Disability fifth award honors one Component or Military Department for achievements in ensuring accessible information and communication technology in the workplace. Awards Ceremony. The 2017 criteria used to determine the award recipients for the Secretary of Defense Awards for Achievement in the Employment of Individuals with Disabilities include multiple measures to The Secretary of Defense Awards are presented to Service members and determine DoD’s progress. Each factor is essential to building a comprehensive and successful civilians with disabilities for their outstanding contributions in supporting affirmative program to recruit, retain, and advance individuals with disabilities including Wounded Warriors and veterans with disabilities. Consistent with the adage that “what gets measured, gets the DoD Mission, and to the DoD Components and Military Departments done,” these exemplary efforts translate into achievement and progress that can be measured. In 2017, Components could also submit documentation of the following exemplary programs and practices as for their exemplary efforts to adopt and implement exemplary practices to part of the criteria: advance a diverse and inclusive workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • Revised Agenda 2/9/15 1:50 PM
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Calhoun, Institutional Archive of the Naval Postgraduate School Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Departments, Schools and Academic Groups Publications Schools, Departments and Academic Groups Publications (Other) 1996-11 Symposium on technology and the mine problem Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/44815 Revised Agenda 2/9/15 1:50 PM APR MAY JUN Close 6 1996 1997 1998 Help Symposium on TECHNOLOGY AND THE MINE PROBLEM | Monday, November 18, 1996 | Tuesday, November 19, 1996 | Wednesday, November 20, 1996 | Thursday, November 21, 1996 General Information Accomodations | How to Register | Access | Climate, Dress Registration Form | Non-U.S. Citizens Revised Agenda as of Nov. 15, 1996 Abstracts of Parallel Sessions (WordPerfect Document) Hopefully this will soon become HTML format Introduction Vision Statement and Goals for the 1996 Symposium Symposium Organization Monday, November 18, 1996 Session I Introduction: Host and Sponsor Welcomes Session II Keynote Address Session III U.S. Army Initiatives in Mine Warfare Session IV Lunch: Strategic Considerations in Expeditionary and Littoral Warfare Session V Operational Needs and Perspectives Session VI The Littoral Environment - The Monterey Bay Aquarium Reception Tuesday, November 19, 1996 Session VII Mining and Mine Threats Session VIII Regional Perspectives on the Mine Threat Session IX Luncheon Session: Humanitarian Demining Session X Humanitarian Demining, Mine Policy Session
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2019 a Message from the Chief of Supply Corps
    Winter 2019 A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps During the first six months as Commander, NAVSUP and 48th Chief of Supply Corps, I have witnessed the hard work our team of dedicated NAVSUP Enterprise professionals, the Navy Supply Corps, and our supply community perform day in and day out. Your commitment, respect and integrity create the culture necessary to effectively serve the fleet and improve warfighter readiness and sustainment. Based on our productive dialogue during the NAVSUP Commander’s Conference and Supply Corps Senior Leader Symposium, I am confident we have the right people, teams and talent positioned globally to support our supply mission and meet the logistics challenges inherent in today’s strategic environment. We must continue to effectively communicate and leverage our global network of experts to consistently provide logistics and sustainment solutions with an unprecedented sense of urgency. This issue of “The Navy Supply Corps Newsletter” features articles on NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center (FLC) Norfolk’s and NAVSUP FLC Sigonella’s dynamic force employment support in the 6th Fleet area of responsibility, an update on NAVSUP reform efforts, and the second excerpt from Rear Adm. Peter Stamatopoulos’ “Maritime Logistics in a Changing Strategic Environment.” In December, the CNO released “A Design for Maintaining Maritime Superiority 2.0,” a document we must all be familiar with and use to guide our actions. We stand at a critical juncture as our Nation and Navy posture for great power competition. Not since the close of World War II have we placed the emphasis on campaign logistics that we are placing on it today.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2018 a Message from the Chief of Supply Corps
    Fall 2018 A Message from the Chief of Supply Corps It is a humbling honor to serve as Commander, NAVSUP and 48th Chief of Supply Corps. I am eager to work with our team of dedicated professionals in the NAVSUP Enterprise, the Navy Supply Corps, and our supply community. Together, we will continue the hard work of those who have gone before to ensure our logistics community effectively serves the fleet and improves warfighter readiness and sustainment. As we work to build the Navy the Nation needs, NAVSUP has a key role in supporting improved readiness, and enduring sustainment of our military might. Our focus remains on the fleet, from the Sailors at sea and all others in harm’s way, to ensuring we enable success in operations and effective combat engagements. We owe this to our warfighters. The changing character of the competition means we must be ready to fight tonight–that is our mandate–that is our imperative. Priorities we will continue to emphasize are taking care of our people, improving fleet readiness, continuing NAVSUP’s reform efforts, and making progress on audit. We are increasing the speed of support and are rallying with other key players in Navy sustainment, collaborating end-to- end to achieve the right outcome for our fleet. NAVSUP and the Supply Corps will bolster our integration role with the Navy’s key readiness and modernization drivers – the shipyards and fleet readiness centers – from material planning to order fulfillment, and everything in between, to better support force generation that is lethal, reliable and timely.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, TUESDAY, MAY 21, 1996 No. 72 House of Representatives The House met at 12:30 p.m. and was entries into the United States, and for which President Clinton spoke and called to order by the Speaker pro tem- other purposes,'' requests a conference highlighted the importance of the pore [Mr. COX of California]. with the House on the disagreeing Asian continent as well as the Pacific f votes of the two Houses thereon, and communities. In so doing he empha- appoints Mr. HATCH, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. sized the importance of active partici- DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO GRASSLEY, Mr. KYL, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. pation of Asian Pacific-Americans in TEMPORE THURMOND, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LEAHY, the United States and in all of their The SPEAKER pro tempore laid be- Mr. SIMON, Mr. KOHL, and Mrs. FEIN- various activities, professionally, aca- fore the House the following commu- STEIN to be the conferees on the part of demically, in business and commerce, nication from the Speaker: the Senate. in international trade, and, in particu- WASHINGTON DC, f lar, in the Federal agencies and in the May 21, 1996. Federal Government and here in the I hereby designate the Honorable CHRIS- MORNING BUSINESS Congress in both the House and the TOPHER COX to act as Speaker pro tempore Senate. on this day. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursu- NEWT GINGRICH, ant to the order of the House of May 12, The March 1994 population of Asian Speaker of the House of Representatives.
    [Show full text]