DOCSLIB.ORG

Miami Herald Notice of Public Hearings Ad.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Miami Herald Notice of Public Hearings Ad.Pdf 10A WK419 From thefront page MIAMIHERALD.COM H1 Trump confidantRoger Stone has along historyinpolitics president, apresidency me,” he told the Herald in Stone’s retreat from D.C. BY HOWARD COHEN ultimately won by Demo- 2014. to Fort Lauderdale wasn’t [email protected] crat Jimmy Carter, who without its bumps. He has beat sitting President Ger- HIS FIRST ‘POLITICAL said there have been two RogerStone, the former ald Ford. Stone would be TRICK’ attempts on his life. informal adviser to Presi- more successful helping Stone is aself-pro- One happened in 2017, dent Donald Trump’s 2016 guide Reagan to victory in claimed “dirty trickster.” when he told Miami presidential campaign who 1980against Carter. His first trick? Helping a Herald news partner CBS4 had worked for decades on Stone has atattoo of his Democrat. that he was avictim of a U.S. political campaigns, idol —Nixon —onhis According to The hit-and-run driver in Pom- was indicted Friday in Fort back. He got it in 2004 in Washington Post, when pano Beach while en route Lauderdale as part of spe- California. “I was drunk, Stone’s high school held a to the airport to promote cial counsel Robert Muell- and it seemed like agood mock vote in the 1960 his book, “The Making of er’s Russia investigation. idea,” he said in a2014 presidential election, Stone the President 2016:How The seven-count Miami Herald profile. stumped for Democrat Donald Trump Orchestrat- indictment charges him Stone also tried to get John F. Kennedy against ed aRevolution.” with lying to Congress and Jack Kemp and Bob Dole Nixon. Yep, that Nixon, the He said at the time the CHARLESTRAINOR JR [email protected] obstructing the probe. into the president’s seat in man he would later immor- accident “‘certainly could Protesters gather as Roger Stone speaks Fridayafter being So who, exactly, is Roger the White House in the talize in ink on his back. be’ Russian hacking-scan- indicted at the federal courthouse in Fort Lauderdale. Stone, the man born 66 1980s and 1990s. But 12 years before he dal retaliation.” years ago in Norwalk, Con- His allegiance to Trump helped guide Nixon into a The Broward Sheriff’s necticut? dates to the time he served second presidential term, Office confirmed that there way for me to sell books,” told her husband Stone was as the future president’s he campaigned at his high had been an accident he told CBS4 at the time. missing something down NO STRANGER TO casino lobbyist in the school for Kennedy in a where Stone said it oc- there. PRESIDENTS 1990s when he first sug- rather underhanded way curred. But he wasn’t listed ‘MIAMIVICE’ STYLE “I’m not wearing socks Stone worked on the gested to Trump that he that hit students where as apassenger in the car BEFORE IT WASATHING until the Soviets are out of 1972 campaign of Presi- consider running for presi- they lived: “I remember that got hit. He said he “Miami Vice” star Don Afghanistan,” Stone told dent Richard Nixon, which dent in 1998. going through the cafeteria took an Uber home and left Johnson wasn’t the first to the soon-to-be president, helped the Republican line and telling every kid the driver behind because make going around with- The New York Times incumbent handily defeat SOUTH FLORIDAISHIS that Nixon was in favor of it was taking deputies too out socks afashion state- reported. ‘‘I had to say Democratic challenger HOME school on Saturdays. It was long to arrive. ment. something, and that an- George McGovern. It was The consultant moved to my first political trick,” He also claimed he was Stone did it as far back swer seemed acceptable to his first major official polit- Fort Lauderdale in 2001 Stone said in the 2007 Post poisoned around Christ- as Reagan’s 1980presi- Gov. Reagan.” ical job. after 9-11. story. mas 2016 withpolonium dential campaign, asarto- Stone worked on Repub- “I could see the smoke but recovered. rial decision not beloved by Howard Cohen: lican Ronald Reagan’s of the Pentagon from my ABUMPY RIDE IN “I know some people the fastidious future first 305-376-3619, failed 1976 campaign for office, and that was it for SOUTH FLORIDA chortle and say this was a lady, Nancy Reagan. She @HowardCohen FROM PAGE 1A anydealwith the special of emails that the special Inaddition, the indict- rapherswaitedoutside the counsel to testify against counsel says were hacked ment delves into whatpros- courthouse. Trump,saying “there is no byRussian officersand ecutors say were Stone’s Stonethanked the judge STONE circumstancewhatsoever then providedtothe anti- false statements to law- after she grantedhis bond, under which Iwill bear secrecy website WikiLeaks. makers about his conversa- which restricts his travel to being released on bond Stone, dressedinanavy falsewitness against the Theindictment says uni- tions withJerome Corsi, a South Florida, Washington, following his arrest Friday blue poloshirt and jeans, presidentnor will Imakeup dentified senior Trump conservative writerand D.C.,New York City,and morning. He is charged told athrongofreporters lies to ease the pressure on campaign officials contact- conspiracy theorist,and the eastern area of Virginia. with obstructing justice, and spectators outside the myself.” ed Stonetoask whenstolen Randy Credico,aNew York The judge asked Stoneto tampering with awitness, courthouse that Mueller’s “I look forward to being emailsrelating to Demo- radiohost. They are identi- surrender his passport as a and lying to Congress in investigation was “politically fullyand completely vindi- craticpresidentialnominee fied in the indictmentas condition of his bond. He Special Counsel Robert motivated” and that he had cated,”Stone,66, said. HillaryClinton might be “Person 1” and “Person 2.” told her that he does not Mueller’s investigation into been “falsely accused” of Theseven-countindict- disclosed. The indictment accuses own acurrent passport the Trump campaign’s lying to the House Intelli- ment filed against Stone Mueller’scasealleges Stoneofcarrying out a because his had expired. possible collusion with the gence Committee. reveals fresh details on how cover-ups anddeceptionby “prolonged effort” to keep Prosecutors Jared Strauss Russian government during The behind-the-scenes Trump campaign associates Stone —not thatheconspir- Credico fromcontradicting and Aaron Zelinskywith the 2016 presidential elec- Trump adviser also de- inthe summer of 2016 ed with WikiLeaks or with Stone’s testimonybefore the U.S. attorney’sofficein tion. clared he would notmake actively sought the release the Russian officersac- theHouse Intelligence South Floridaalso request- cused of hacking the Committee. Prosecutors ed that Stone undergo a emails. Stone, instead, is claim thatStonerepeatedly substance-abuse screening. accusedoflying to congres- told Credico to “do a‘Frank The judge ordered one as sional members in aMay Pentangeli,’ ”referringto part of his bond conditions. 2017 letter andinhis Sep- the“The Godfather:Part Stone’s arraignment date tember 2017 testimony II”character who lies to must stillbeset in the fed- about WikiLeaks’ activities. Congress. Stoneisalso eral court in Washington, Heisalso accused of ob- accused of threatening D.C. In the meantime, structingacongressional Credico as well as hisdog, Stonewill be abletostay at CITY OF SOUTHMIAMI probe intowhether the Bianca. his FortLauderdalehome Trump campaign collab- On Friday, Trump and as he awaits trial. Stone’s NOTICEOFPUBLIC HEARINGS orated withRussiatosabo- his defense team blasted defense team consists of NOTICE IS HEREBY given that the City of SouthMiami, Florida proposes to adoptthe tage the U.S. election to Stone’s indictment.Trump FortLauderdale lawyers following ordinances: help him beat Clinton, as attorneyJay Sekulowsaid it Bruce Rogow, Tara Cam- well as beingaccused of “does not allegeRussian pion, RobertBuschel,and An Ordinance modifying the following sectionsofthe Land Development Code: tamperingwith acongres- collusion by Roger Stone or GrantSmith. Section20-3.1 Zoninguse districtsand purposes (A) and (B); Section 20-3.3 Permitted sional witness. by anyone else.”Trump Outside the courthouse, Use Schedule; Section 20-3.4 Special Use Conditions; andArticle VIII, Transit- Theindictmentsays calledthe investigation the Rogow, the most prominent Oriented Development District, Sections 20-8.1 through 20-8.17. Stonerepeatedly discussed “Greatest WitchHunt in member of Stone’s team, An Ordinance amending the City of South Miami OfficialZoning Map to advance WikiLeaks withTrump theHistory of our Coun- called the FBI’searlymorn- Goalsofthe Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element and the purpose of the campaign associates and try!” ing arrestofthe longtime Transit-Oriented Development District includingthe following rezonings: (1) certain detailshis conversations During his brief hearing GOPpolitical operative a about emails stolen from inFortLauderdale federal “spectacle.” parcelsfrom Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed Use4(TODD MU-4) to Clinton campaign chairman courtafterhis arrest, Stone “Everyoneknows where Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed Use 5(TODD MU-5); and (2) certain John Podesta and posted was granted a$250,000 Roger Stone is; he’s not in parcelsfrom Transit-Oriented Development District Light Industrial 4(TODD LI-4), onlineinthe weeksbefore bond that was jointly rec- hiding,” Rogow said.“The to Transit-Oriented Development District Mixed Use6(TODD MU-6). Trumpdefeated Clinton. ommended by U.S. prose- spectaclethis morningwith Prosecutors allegethat cutors and his defense the SWAT teambreaking Stone
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why Are We Still Talking About Randy Credico?
    WHY ARE WE STILL TALKING ABOUT RANDY CREDICO? And with the election done (and some big successes in MI), we resume our regularly scheduled Russian investigation. Yesterday, the WaPo reported that the two Stone associates who, it reported on October 21, claimed they could corroborate Roger Stone’s claim that Randy Credico was his go-between with WikiLeaks have testified to the grand jury. Two Stone associates, filmmaker David Lugo and attorney Tyler Nixon, also told The Post that Credico acknowledged in conversations last year being the source of material for Stone’s statements and tweets about WikiLeaks. Nixon said he would be willing to testify before the grand jury about a dinner at which Credico fretted that his liberal friends would be displeased that he was a source for the arch- conservative Stone. Lugo provided The Post with text messages in which Credico said: “I knew Rodger [sic] was going to name me sooner or later and so I told you that I’m the so-called back Channel.” Chuck Ross had more details (first) about Nixon’s interaction with the FBI and Mueller’s team. I feel about this reporting the same way I feel about the Roger Stone stories generally: that virtually all of the reporting is missing the point of what Mueller is looking at. Indeed, the far more interesting detail in the WaPo report is that Jerome Corsi (who, remember, said that he avoided legal exposure with something related to Stone) has spent weeks chatting with Mueller’s team. Separately, conservative writer Jerome Corsi was interviewed by investigators over three days last week and appears to be emerging as a key witness in the Mueller investigation into Stone’s activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty's Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism
    Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center Occasional Papers Series Series Editor Tony Saich Deputy Editor Jessica Engelman The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion. By training the very best leaders, developing powerful new ideas, and disseminating innovative solutions and institutional reforms, the Center’s goal is to meet the profound challenges facing the world’s citizens. The Ford Foundation is a founding donor of the Center. Additional information about the Ash Center is available at ash.harvard.edu. This research paper is one in a series funded by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. The views expressed in the Ash Center Occasional Papers Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series are intended to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. This paper is copyrighted by the author(s). It cannot be reproduced or reused without permission. Ash Center Occasional Papers Tony Saich, Series Editor Something Has Cracked: Post-Truth Politics and Richard Rorty’s Postmodernist Bourgeois Liberalism Joshua Forstenzer University of Sheffield (UK) July 2018 Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation Harvard Kennedy School Letter from the Editor The Roy and Lila Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation advances excellence and innovation in governance and public policy through research, education, and public discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES of AMERICA, ) ) V
    Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 362 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 81 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) v. ) Crim. Action No. 19-0018 (ABJ) ) ROGER J. STONE, JR., ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUMOPINION INTRODUCTION On November 15, 2019, the jury returned a unanimous verdict in the case of United States v. Roger J. Stone. It found the defendant guilty of seven crimes: one count of obstructing a Congressional investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505; five separate counts of making a false statement to the government in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; and tampering with a witness, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(1). Once the verdict had been returned,the jurors were officially released from the prohibition against discussing the case that had beenin effect during the trial. A week later, one of the jurors published a column in the Washington Post describing his experience. Likejurors everywhere,none of us asked for thisresponsibilitybut each of usacceptedit willingly. We served the propositionthat everyoneisentitled to a fair trial and that everyoneis innocentuntilprovenguilty. * * * The evidence in this case was substantialand almost entirely uncontested. We listened carefully to the testimony of a series of witnesses and carefullyexaminedevery element of every charge and its defense,and we unanimouslyagreedthat each had been provedbeyonda reasonabledoubt. * * * 1 Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 362 Filed 04/16/20 Page 2 of 81 I am proud of our democratic institutions; their value was reaffirmed for me because of the process we went through and the respect we accorded it.
    [Show full text]
  • Contempt of Courts? President Trump's
    CONTEMPT OF COURTS? PRESIDENT TRUMP’S TRANSFORMATION OF THE JUDICIARY Brendan Williams* Faced with a letter from the American Bar Association (ABA) assessing him as “arrogant, lazy, an ideologue, and lacking in knowledge of the day-to-day practice,” Lawrence VanDyke, nominated by President Trump to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, cried during an October 2019 confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.1 Republican senators dutifully attacked the ABA as liberally-biased.2 In a Wall Street Journal column, a defender of VanDyke assailed what he called a “smear campaign” and wrote that “[t]he ABA’s aggressive politicization is especially frustrating for someone like me, an active member of the ABA[.]”3 VanDyke was confirmed anyway.4 Contrary to Republican protestations, the ABA has deemed 97% of President Trump’s nominees to be “well qualified” or “qualified.”5 Indeed, in the most polarizing judicial nomination of the Trump Administration, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh’s defenders pointed to the ABA having rated him “well qualified” despite the association having once, in 2006, dropped his rating to “qualified” due to concerns about his temperament.6 *Attorney Brendan Williams is the author of over 30 law review articles, predominantly on civil rights and health care issues. A former Washington Supreme Court judicial clerk, Brendan is a New Hampshire long-term care advocate. This article is dedicated to his father Wayne Williams, admitted to the Washington bar in 1970. 1Hannah Knowles, Trump Judicial Nominee Cries over Scathing Letter from the American Bar Association, WASH. POST (Oct. 30, 2015). 2Id.
    [Show full text]
  • On Credico and Stone and Hillary’S Purported
    ON CREDICO AND STONE AND HILLARY’S PURPORTED LIBYA EMAIL WSJ has an underreported story revealing that Roger Stone emailed Randy Credico seeking specific emails from Wikileaks in September 2016. Former Trump campaign adviser Roger Stone privately sought information he considered damaging to Hillary Clinton from WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to emails reviewed by The Wall Street Journal. The emails could raise new questions about Mr. Stone’s testimony before the House Intelligence Committee in September, in which he said he “merely wanted confirmation” from an acquaintance that Mr. Assange had information about Mrs. Clinton, according to a portion of the transcript that was made public. In a Sept. 18, 2016, message, Mr. Stone urged an acquaintance who knew Mr. Assange to ask the WikiLeaks founder for emails related to Mrs. Clinton’s alleged role in disrupting a purported Libyan peace deal in 2011 when she was secretary of state, referring to her by her initials. “Please ask Assange for any State or HRC e-mail from August 10 to August 30–particularly on August 20, 2011,” Mr. Stone wrote to Randy Credico, a New York radio personality who had interviewed Mr. Assange several weeks earlier. Mr. Stone, a longtime confidant of Donald Trump, had no formal role in his campaign at the time. I say it’s underreported for two reasons: as presented, WSJ doesn’t really explain why this is news. It doesn’t show that the emails were responsive to HPSCI’s request, a point made by Stone’s attorney in the story and not refuted by Adam Schiff.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fascist Theory Behind Mark Penn
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 35, Number 16, April 18, 2008 perfected the manipulation of mass psychology, or “group dy- told Clinton that he must become a “fiscal conservative,” and namics,” in affiliation with the British Royal Family’s Tavis- move against the “entitlements” such as Social Security, or he tock Institute. Adolf Hitler, in Mein Kampf, among others, would not be re-elected. drew upon the Bernays and le Bon work for much of the fas- On April 4, 2008, Penn apologized for “an error in judg- cist theory of crowd control. ment,” after being publicly exposed for working, as CEO of It was David Ogilvy’s WPP, through its subsidiary Hill & WPP’s Burson-Marsteller, on contract with the Colombian Knowlton, that in 1991 ran the “Iraqis kill Kuwaiti babies” government to promote George Bush’s Colombia-U.S.A. free campaign of deceit, to soften opposition to the invasion of Iraq trade treaty. Hillary Clinton was then in the closing weeks of that Thatcher had urged on President George H.W. Bush. the crucial Pennsylvania primary race, in which her stand In 2003, it was WPP, through its subsidiary BKSH—Rog- against free trade had become the central issue. er Stone’s old firm—that managed the Iraqi National Con- Two days later, on April 6, 2008, the London Daily Mail gress/Ahmed Chalabi campaign of lies behind British Prime disclosed that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown “is secret- Minister Tony Blair’s push for a new Iraq war. ly planning to headhunt the world’s most expensive polling ex- By this time, Mark Penn was chief executive of WPP’s pert in an attempt to revive his political fortunes.” The Daily worldwide subsidiary Burson-Marsteller, of which the old Mail commented that “Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT for the RECORD Assistant United States Attorney Aaron S
    STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD Assistant United States Attorney Aaron S. J. Zelinsky House Judiciary Committee June 24, 2020 Good afternoon, Chairman Nadler, ranking Member Jordan, and Members of the Committee. In response to your subpoena, I am prepared to testify before you today about the sentencing in UnitedStates v.Roger Stone. Since 2014, I have been privileged to serve as one of over 5,000 Assistant UnitedStates Attorneys.We arenon-partisancareer prosecutorsworkinginoffices throughoutthecountry.Our job is to see that justiceis done,in every case,without fear or favor.Withoutparty or politics. I remain committed to these principles, as I am likewise committed to complying with your subpoena to the best of my ability. It is unusual for a prosecutor to testify about a criminal case, and given my role as a prosecutor, there are reasons why my testimony will necessarily be limited. The Department of Justice has indicated it may assert certain privileges related to investigative information and decisions, ongoing matters within the Department, and deliberations within the Department. I intend to respect the invocation of these privileges in appropriate circumstances, but also recognize that, for example, the deliberative process privilege does not apply when testimony sheds light on government misconduct, or when the Government has disclosed deliberative information selectively and misleadingly. The Department has cleared my submission of this written statement. The first thing every AUSA learns is that we have an ethical and legal obligationto treat every defendantequally and fairly.No one is entitledto moreor less because of who they are,who they know,or what they believe.In the United States of America,we do not prosecutepeoplebecauseof their politics.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-05-20 Roger Stone Interim
    DuCharme, Se·th (ODAG) From: DuCharme, Seth (ODAG) Sent: Tuesday, February 4, 2020 10: 17 PM To: Hovakimian, Patrick (ODAG) Cc: Rosen, Jeffrey A. (ODAG) Subject: Re: Stone sentencing I am tracking. Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2020, at 9:03 PM, Hovakimian, Patrick {ODAG) <[email protected]> wrote: > > Papers a re due from the United States on Friday, according to Metcalf. > > Patrick Hovakimian > (b) (6) 0106 Document ID: 0.7.4262.5159 Zelinsky, Aaron (USAMD) From: Zelinsky, Aaron (USAMO} Sent: Monday, February 10, 2020 1:59 PM To: Metcalf, David {OOAG) Subject: Re: I'm back in my office Meeting with my trial team. Will let you know when done. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2020, at 1:56 PM, Metcalf, David (ODAG} <[email protected]> wrote: I just stopped by. Where are you? Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2020, at 1:43 PM, Zelinsky, Aaron (USAMD) (b)(6) per EOUSA wrote: (b) (6) Sent from my iPhone On Feb 10, 2020, at 1:37 PM, Zelinsky, Aaron {USAMD) (b)(6) per EOUSA wrote: Dave, (b)(6) Best, Aaron 0117 Document ID: 0.7.4262.7445 Metcalf, David (USADC) From : Metcalf, David (USADC) Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:28 AM To: Metcalf, David {OOAG) Subject: Fwd: Stone's Sentencing Memo Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Eva ngelista, Alessio {USADC)" (b)(6) per EOUSA Date: February 11, 2020 at 10:20:49 AM EST To: "Cooney, Joseph (USADC)" (b)(6) per EOUSA , "Crabb, John 0. (USADC)" (b)(6) per EOUSA Cc: "Metcalf, David (USADC)" (b )(6) per EOUSA Subject: Stone's Sentencing Memo 0124 Document ID: 0.7.4262.7444 Metcalf, David (USADC) From : Metcalf, David (USADC) Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2020 10:28 AM To: Metcalf, David {OOAG) Subject: Fwd: Stone sentencing memo Attachments: stone sentencing memo 2-10-20.docx; ATT0OOOl.htm Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "Cooney, Joseph (USADC)" (b )(6) per EOUSA Date: February 10, 2020 at 4:25:40 PM EST To: "Metcalf, David (USAOC)" , "Evangelista, Alessio {USAOC)" (b)(6) per EOUSA , "Crabb, John D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:19-CR-00018-ABJ UNITED STATES of AMERICA, V. ROGER
    Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 141 Filed 06/27/19 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case No.: 1:19-CR-00018-ABJ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ROGER J. STONE, JR., Defendant. ______________________________/ RESPONSE TO MINUTE ORDER ALLOWING RESPONSE TO GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND FOR A HEARING (DKT. 136) Justice Breyer, concurring in part and dissenting in part in Iancu v. Brunetti, -- S.Ct. ---, 2019 WL 2570622 (June 24, 2019), wrote: “I would appeal more often and more directly to the values the First Amendment seeks to protect. As I have previously written, I would ask whether the regulation at issue ‘works speech-related harm that is out of proportion to its justifications.’ United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709, 730 (2012).” See, Opinion of Breyer, J., at *8. In Alvarez, Justice Breyer’s concurrence in the decision relating to the Stolen Valor Act concluded that “the statute as presently drafted works disproportionate constitutional harm.” Alvarez, 567, U.S. at 739 (Breyer, J. concurring). The government’s June 20, 2019 Motion For An Order To Show Cause And For A Hearing (Dkt. 136), is a disproportionate response to Roger Stone’s exercise of his First Amendment rights within the confines of this Court’s Order. The government, presenting several Instagram posts, writes: These posts are not the first statements that appear to have run afoul of the Court’s order. The government is bringing this matter to the Court’s attention now because Stone’s most recent posts 1 Case 1:19-cr-00018-ABJ Document 141 Filed 06/27/19 Page 2 of 11 represent a direct attempt to appeal to major media outlets to publish information that is not relevant to, but may prejudice, this case.
    [Show full text]
  • Doj's Arguments in Trump Litigation Should Benefit Other Defendants
    NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL SPECIAL REPORT White-Collar Crime WWW. NYLJ.COM VOLUME 264—NO. 102 MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, 2020 DOJ’s Arguments in Trump Litigation Should Benefit Other Defendants BY HARRY SANDICK AND JACOB TUttLE NEWMAN n the past year, we have seen the Department of Justice (DOJ), under I the direction of Attorney General William Barr, present arguments in sev- eral cases that implicate the conduct of either President Donald Trump or his close advisors. In this article, we consider certain positions taken by DOJ in cases involving Roger Stone, Michael Flynn and the subpoenas duces tecum issued by the New York District Attor- ney’s Office in connection with its inves- tigation into the Trump Organization. In each instance, DOJ has taken positions that diverge from the positions usually taken by DOJ prosecutors in ordinary they are friends with the president. This ‘United States v. Roger Stone’ criminal prosecutions. is why bar associations and former This has led to understandable criti- prosecutors have spoken out against Roger Stone, a longtime Republican cism: Why should DOJ treat President these steps. Rather than insist that operative and a friend and advisor of Trump or his advisors differently than the president’s associates be treated President Trump, was convicted of other defendants are treated? Equal jus- more harshly, we offer this modest pro- crimes relating to the obstruction of tice under law is the highest value of posal: Remedy the unequal treatment the Mueller investigation into Russian our legal system, and no one should by affording to all criminal defendants interference with the 2016 presidential receive preferential treatment because the same consideration accorded to election.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chronology Is Drawn from a Variety of Sources Including
    Chronology and Background to the Horowitz Report The chronology is drawn from a variety of sources including, principally, The Russia investigation and Donald Trump: a timeline from on-the-record sources (updated), John Kruzel, (Politifact, July 16, 2018). Spring 2014: A company, the Internet Research Agency, linked to the Kremlin and specializing in influence operations devises a strategy to interfere with the 2016 U.S. presidential election by sowing distrust in both individual candidates and the American political structure. June 16, 2015: Donald Trump announces his candidacy for president. July 2015: Computer hackers supported by the Russian government penetrate the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer network. Summer and Fall of 2015: Thousands of social media accounts created by Russian surrogates initiate a propaganda and disinformation campaign reflecting a decided preference for the Trump candidacy. March 19, 2016: Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta, falls victim to an email phishing scam. March 2016: George Papadopoulos joins the Trump campaign as an adviser. While traveling in mid-March, Papadopoulos meets a London-based professor, Josef Mifsud, who Papadopoulos understands to have “substantial connections to Russian government officials.” March 21, 2016: Trump identifies Papadopoulos and Carter Page as members of his foreign policy team, in an interview with the Washington Post. March 29, 2016: Trump appointed Paul Manafort to manage the Republican National Convention for the Trump campaign. March 31, 2016: Following a meeting with Josef Mifsud in Italy, Papadopoulos tells Trump, Jeff Sessions, Carter Page and other campaign members that he can use his Russian connections to arrange a meeting between Trump and Putin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns
    The Long New Right and the World It Made Daniel Schlozman Johns Hopkins University [email protected] Sam Rosenfeld Colgate University [email protected] Version of January 2019. Paper prepared for the American Political Science Association meetings. Boston, Massachusetts, August 31, 2018. We thank Dimitrios Halikias, Katy Li, and Noah Nardone for research assistance. Richard Richards, chairman of the Republican National Committee, sat, alone, at a table near the podium. It was a testy breakfast at the Capitol Hill Club on May 19, 1981. Avoiding Richards were a who’s who from the independent groups of the emergent New Right: Terry Dolan of the National Conservative Political Action Committee, Paul Weyrich of the Committee for the Survival of a Free Congress, the direct-mail impresario Richard Viguerie, Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum and STOP ERA, Reed Larson of the National Right to Work Committee, Ed McAteer of Religious Roundtable, Tom Ellis of Jesse Helms’s Congressional Club, and the billionaire oilman and John Birch Society member Bunker Hunt. Richards, a conservative but tradition-minded political operative from Utah, had complained about the independent groups making mischieF where they were not wanted and usurping the traditional roles of the political party. They were, he told the New Rightists, like “loose cannonballs on the deck of a ship.” Nonsense, responded John Lofton, editor of the Viguerie-owned Conservative Digest. If he attacked those fighting hardest for Ronald Reagan and his tax cuts, it was Richards himself who was the loose cannonball.1 The episode itself soon blew over; no formal party leader would follow in Richards’s footsteps in taking independent groups to task.
    [Show full text]