DOCSLIB.ORG

Medford Square and the Mystic River Reconnection, Revitalization, Redevelopment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Medford Square and the Mystic River Reconnection, Revitalization, Redevelopment Medford SquareReconnection, and the revitalization, Mystic redevelopment River City of Medford, Massachusetts Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Urban Studies and Planning Community Growth and Land Use Planning | Fall 2006 Medford Square and the Mystic River Reconnection, revitalization, redevelopment City of Medford, Massachusetts Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Urban Studies and Planning Community Growth and Land Use Planning | Fall 2006 Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Executive Summary 1 Mystic River Greenway 3 Transportation and Streetscape 21 Redevelopment Proposals 39 Appendices Attached Separately MIT-Medford Acknowledgements Credits Don Oulette Instructors Students We thank the individuals listed below for Medford Engineering Department their input and contributions. However, Professors: Greenway: the MIT students and instructors directly Charles Passanisi Valerie Gingrich involved in the workshop assume full Deputy Director of Capital Budget, Eran Ben-Joseph Helen Lee responsibility for the content of this report Massachusetts Bay Transportation Associate Professor of Molly Markarian and any errors therein. Authority Landscape Architecture and Planning Daniel McGill Simone Auster Scott Peterson Mathias Rosenfeld President, Emerald Necklace Conservancy Manager of Transportation Systems Terry S. Szold Kate Van Tassel Analysis Group, Central Transportation Adjunct Associate Professor of Lauren DiLorenzo Planning Staff Land Use Planning Transportation: Planning Director, City of Medford Justin Antos Barbara Rubel Teaching assistant: Zhiyu Chen Dan Driscoll Director of Community Relations, Tufts David Lee Planner, Department of Conservation & University Thomas Oles Francesca Napolitan Recreation Karl Seidman Redevelopment: Ryan Hayworth Senior Lecturer, MIT Joshua DeFlorio Medford Historical Society Nand Sharma Ari Goldstein Angela Meehan Brian Kerins Transportation Systems Analysis Group, Phillippe Morgan de Rivery Deputy Director, City of Medford Central Transportation Planning Staff Nakeischea Smith Department of Public Works Clodagh Stoker-Long Mayor Michael McGlynn Planner, City of Medford Mayor of Medford John Tourtelotte Nat Norton Berkshire Development VHB Engineers, Watertown Cheryl White Julie O’Brien Executive Director, Medford Chamber of Director of Planning, Department of Commerce Conservation & Recreation i MIT-Medford Executive Summary The MIT team looked at strategic areas in downtown Medford strive to address the Medford Square and along the Mystic River. following goals: connect neighborhoods Both local and regional in scope, this report to the Square, enable access to the recommends ways in which Medford can Mystic River, improve the pedestrian revitalize its great assets. environment, and reorient the road network to local use. The following areas Mystic River Greenway were selected as key intervention points With the many waterfront assets found for the City of Medford as they represent in Medford, a regional greenway system existing transportation infrastructure with would draw Medford residents and the biggest problems but also the highest visitors to and along the river, attracted potential for improvement: Clippership by new connectivity and activities. The Drive, the area around Main Street at Mystic River Greenway will run from Route 16 or the “South Gateway” and the the Alewife Brook Greenway to Station area near the rotary and Salem Street or Landing/Wellington Station. The proposed the “Northeast Gateway”. For each of path runs through land owned by the City these sites specific recommendations are of Medford and the MA Department of provided that address the road network Conservation and Recreation (DCR); as and streetscape to ensure a effective such, the City will have to further cultivate pedestrian and vehicle environment, and a strong working relationship with DCR. offer design elements which can improve The greenway provides an opportunity to the image of Medford and highlight its improve the ecological health of the river, history. create opportunities for passive and active recreation along its banks, and to involve Redevelopment residents, businesses and institutions in Currently the City of Medford owns shaping the greenway. To facilitate these three parcels on the eastern edge of the Square that are ripe with development outcomes, the City should initiate the The proposed interventions for Medford Square and Clippership Drive formation of the Mystic River Greenway potential. With an established zoning Committee to catalyze the formation of a overlay district, these parcels will create opportunities for a viable and progressive expected. The implementation of a Medford public-private partnership. new opportunities to retain the original future. Development scenarios and a “Main Streets” program will strengthen character while enhancing the retail and model RFP will serve as a guide for the City existing businesses and attract new Transportation and Streetscape economic climate. Development fostered in attracting developers to these parcels investment to the Square, linking together Several recommended key transportation within the Square will honor and respects and providing information on the amount physical and economic development. and street design interventions in the City’s historic past, while forging of revenue and public benefit that can be MIT-Medford 1 Mystic River Greenway Introduction The riverfront open space group was tasked Goals with developing a plan to capitalize on • Connect transit nodes, residential the assets of the Mystic River in Medford. neighborhoods, recreational amenities, While a number of prior reports have and business districts to the river. suggested ways to improve the Mystic • Create a vibrant mix of uses and activities River, this report synthesizes previous along the river. ideas into a practical solution: a regional • Engage residents, businesses, and Mystic River Greenway. institutions in shaping and building the greenway. The Mystic River Greenway, complete • Convey a unique identity that reflects with a continuous multi-use path, will the local character, the history, and the meet transportation and recreational needs environment. of local residents, visitors, and regional • Restore and maintain the river’s ecological commuters alike. The greenway will also integrity as a regional resource. create opportunities to restore the river to a healthier state and encourage both Objectives active and passive recreational uses such • Establish high priority links to the river. as biking, walking, picnicking, canoeing, • Locate priority sites for views, uses and relaxation and enjoyment of views. river access along the Mystic. Creating a vibrant greenway will be nearly • Identify models for community impossible without joint collaboration partnership and non-profit collaboration. of citizens, the City of Medford, and • Improve signage related to way-finding, the Commonwealth’s Department of history, and environmental stewardship. Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The • Select opportunities for improving water City should take an active role in facilitating quality, creating wildlife habitat, and Recommendations • Form a Medford Greenway Committee diversifying the landscape this collaborative effort. • Collaborate with DCR on Mystic River to: Master Plan planning process. • Ensure local participation in the master While the Mystic River currently lacks the • Cultivate a productive working plan process. allure to draw people to the waterfront, the relationship with DCR. • Investigate funding sources. recommendations outlined in this section • Develop a public-private partnership are designed to address this challenge by organization. establishing a unique identity and amenities for the Mystic River. Mystic River Waterfront: MIT-Medford 3 Connections Medford Square Commercial Zone Alewife Tufts Brook Minuteman Path Re-establishing physical, psychological, and social connections is an overarching goal of the Mystic River Greenway. The Greenway would physically reconnect businesses, transportation hubs, and neighborhoods, psychologically reconnect residents to nature, and socially reconnect the City of Medford, community groups, DCR, and other institutions. Planning with DCR As the map at right indicates, DCR controls a majority of land along the Mystic River. Therefore, it is important that the City cultivate and strengthen its relationship with DCR in order to implement the suggestions made in this report. Auburn Street to Winthrop Street Auburn Street to Cradock Bridge Cradock Bridge to I-93 Currently, DCR is creating a Mystic River This grassy area is an underutilized Improved circulation, stronger visual Clippership Park will extend the civic life Master Plan with the first phase to be recreational asset that connects adjacent connections to the river, and a steady of the Square to the river. A DCR easement completed by June 2007. This provides neighborhoods as well as an ecologically increase of public uses will integrate the along the senior housing properties enables an immediate opportunity for the City to rich western gateway to the greenway that Greenway and Medford Square into a the path to continue towards I-93, with a work with DCR and advocate for desired can draw people toward Medford Square. unified, multi-use community asset. bike lane along Riverside Avenue serving changes along the greenway. as a short term connection. 4 Mystic River Waterfront: MIT-Medford Connections The Mystic River
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations
    Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Fore River Watershed Mystic River Watershed Neponset River Watershed Weir River Watershed Project Number 2002-02/MWI June 30, 2003 Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI June 30, 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed Association Report Prepared for: Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Resource Protection Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs Ellen Roy Herzfelder, Secretary Department of Environmental Protection Robert W. Golledge, Jr., Commissioner Bureau of Resource Protection Cynthia Giles, Assistant Commissioner Division of Municipal Services Steven J. McCurdy, Director Division of Watershed Management Glenn Haas, Director Boston Harbor Watersheds Water Quality & Hydrologic Investigations Project Number 2002-01/MWI July 2001 through June 2003 Report Prepared by: Ian Cooke, Neponset River Watershed Association Libby Larson, Mystic River Watershed Association Carl Pawlowski, Fore River Watershed Association Wendy Roemer, Neponset River Watershed Association Samantha Woods, Weir River Watershed
    [Show full text]
  • Healey + Mystic
    What if Somerville’s Healey School Healey What if Somerville’s and Mystic neighborhoods were reimagined as a single riverfront community? HEALEY + MYSTIC 2 | HEALEY+MYSTIC MASTER PLAN | March 2017 HEALEY MYSTIC MASTER PLAN by Friends of Healey in partnership with the Mystic Learning Center and with support from the City of Somerville through the Community Preservation Act March 2017 Acknowledgements Friends of the Healey Margaret Kurth Abby Luthin Jean Millete Gregory Nadeau Mystic Learning Center Florence “Fluffy” Bergmann City of Somerville Office of the Mayor, Joseph A. Curtatone Office of Strategic Planning and Community Development Somerville Public Schools, Mary Skipper, Superintendent Arthur D. Healey School, Jill Geiser, Principal Community Preservation Committee • Design Team GroundView Groundwork Somerville Groundwork Lawrence Utile • This master plan process was made possible with funding from the Somerville Community Preservation Act. Contents CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 3 PLANNING PROCESS 6 Vision 72 Community Outreach 10 Current Site 72 Community Participation 12 Ownership 75 Community Workshop Inventory 14 Size 76 Organizing Ideas 16 Site History 78 Design Scenarios 18 Building History 80 Incremental 20 A Topographic and Social Barrier 82 Transformative 84 Community Response CHAPTER 2 ANALYSIS 24 Urban Context CHAPTER 4 THE MASTER PLAN 26 Demographics 90 Large Projects, Design 28 Open Space Need 94 Large Projects, Management 30 City Open Space 96 Small Projects 32 Study Area Open Space 34 Program Providers CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION
    [Show full text]
  • DCR's Beaver Brook Reservation
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Resource Management Planning Program RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts March 2010 DCR’s Beaver Brook Reservation Historic Beaver Brook Reservation and Beaver Brook North Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010 Deval L. Patrick, Governor Timothy P. Murray, Lt. Governor Ian A. Bowles, Secretary Richard K. Sullivan, Jr., Commissioner Jack Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Parks Operations The Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), an agency of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, oversees 450,000 acres of parks and forests, beaches, bike trails, watersheds, dams, and parkways. Led by Commissioner Richard K. Sullivan Jr., the agency’s mission is to protect, promote, and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural, and recreational resources. To learn more about DCR, our facilities, and our programs, please visit www.mass.gov/dcr. Contact us at [email protected]. Printed on Recycled Paper RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Expanded Beaver Brook Reservation Belmont, Lexington and Waltham, Massachusetts Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Planning Process 2 Distinctive Characteristics of the Expanded Reservation 2 Priority Findings 3 Recommendations 5 Capital Improvements 7 Land Stewardship Zoning Guidelines 9 Management
    [Show full text]
  • Horsley Witten Group Technical Analysis Upper Alewife Brook Basin
    +RUVOH\:LWWHQ*URXS 6XVWDLQDEOH(QYLURQPHQWDO6ROXWLRQV 5RXWH$6DQGZLFK0$ 3KRQH)D[ZZZKRUVOH\ZLWWHQFRP 7HFKQLFDO$QDO\VLV 8SSHU$OHZLIH%URRN%DVLQ ,PSDFW6WXG\ )HEUXDU\ 3UHSDUHGIRU (OOHQ0DVV )ULHQGVRI$OHZLIH5HVHUYDWLRQ $OHZLIH%URRN3DUNZD\ %HOPRQW0$ 6SRQVRUHGE\ %HOPRQW/DQG7UXVW &DPEULGJH*UHHQ %HOPRQW&LWL]HQV)RUXP Upper Alewife Brook Watershed Technical Analysis Table of Contents Page 1.0 Purpose 1 2.0 The Study Area 1 3.0 Flooding and Stormwater 2 4.0 Habitat 6 5.0 Water Quality 8 6.0 Smart Growth and Low Impact Development 10 7.0 References 11 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 ± Hydrologic Analysis 3 Table 2 ± Scientific Studies on Wildlife Habitat at the Belmont Uplands 6 Table 3 ± Phosphorus Loading Analysis 9 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 ± Mystic River Watershed and Subbasins Figure 2 ± FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Alewife Subbasin Figure 3 ± Recharge Rates Figure 4 ± Impervious Cover Alewife Subbasin Figure 5 ± Impervious Cover vs. Native Fish Species Figure 6 ± Phosphorus Loading Rates 8 Figure 7 ± Phosphorus Loading Analysis 9 Figure 8 ± Low Impact Development Stormwater BMPs Technical Analysis ± Upper Alewife Brook Watershed 1.0 Purpose This report was prepared to provide the towns of Arlington, Belmont and Cambridge a clear understanding of the hydrologic and ecological considerations associated with continued development of environmentally-sensitive lands associated with the upper Alewife Brook Watershed which includes Little River in Cambridge and several ponds and streams. A specific focus is provided on the proposed development project at the Belmont Uplands site which is characterized by Charles Katuska, PVVS, Chair conservation Commission in Sutton, as a silver maple forest monoculture. The report provides a technical summary of flooding, habitat, water quality, and climate change as they substantially affect the regional subject area.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic River Watershed Stormwater Retrofits Woburn, Massachusetts 30% Concept Plans June 2021
    MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED STORMWATER RETROFITS WOBURN, MASSACHUSETTS 30% CONCEPT PLANS JUNE 2021 Sheet List Table WOBURN Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 COVER 2 GENERAL NOTES 3 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 DEMO & ESC PLAN 5 SITE PLAN 6 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 7 DETAIL GRADING PLAN 8 STREAM RESTORATION PLAN 9 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS 10 PLANTING DETAILS North WINN ST MASSACHUSETTS SCALE 1" = 150000' PROJECT SHERIDAN ST AREA BURLINGTON WOBURN GENERAL NOTES: 1. THIS PLAN SET IS FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT ONLY AND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2. SITE INFORMATION: PLAT: 41 LOT: 16 ADDRESS: 75 BEDFORD ROAD ZONING DISTRICT: RESIDENTIAL 1 Plan Set: MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED SITE STORMWATER RETROFITS WOBURN, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared For: Mystic River Watershed Association 20 Academy St Ste 306 H:\Projects\2021\21008 upper mystic river watershed\Drawings\_Woburn\21008 WOBURN CN.dwg Arlington, MA 02476 North (781) 316-3438 Prepared By: Horsley Witten Group, Inc. WOBURN Sustainable Environmental Solutions SCALE 1" = 20000' SITE www.horsleywitten.com Headquarters SCALE 1" =1000' 112 Water Street, 6th Floor 55 Dorrance Street, Suite 200 90 Route 6A 113 Water Street, R2 Boston, MA 02109 Providence, RI 02906 Sandwich, MA 02563 Exeter, NH 03833 (857) 263-8193 voice (401) 272-1717 voice (508) 833-6600 voice (603) 658-1660 (617) 574-4799 fax (401) 439-8368 fax (508) 833-3150 fax Registration: Project Number: Revisions 21008 1 2 Sheet Number: 3 1 of 10 DRAFT 4 NOT FOR 5 Drawing Number: 6 CONSTRUCTION 7 - 1C last modified: 06/30/21 printed: by ml Rev. Date By Appr. Description GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: BASIC CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE: EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Master Plan DRAFT Interim Report
    Arlington Master Plan REVISED Working Paper Series: Natural Resources and Open Space Introduction Arlington’s landscape is defined by natural features that influence the location and intensity of development. Lakes and ponds, brooks, wetlands, and protected open space provide important public health and ecological benefits, as well as recreational opportunities. Activities in Arlington also affect neighboring towns, so local policies and practices relating to water and other natural resources have regional consequences. This master plan element focuses on irreplaceable land and water resources that must be considered in Menotomy Rocks Park trail. decisions about where, what, and how much to build as Arlington continues to evolve. A. GOALS FOR OPEN SPACE AND NATURAL RESOURCES • Ensure that Arlington’s neighborhoods, commercial areas, and infrastructure are developed in harmony with natural resource concerns. • Value, protect, and maintain the Town’s physical beauty, natural habitats, water bodies, parks, and other open spaces. • Use sustainable planning and engineering approaches to improve air and water quality, reduce flooding, and enhance ecological diversity by managing our natural resources. • Mitigate and adapt to climate change. B. KEY FINDINGS • Arlington’s beauty is influenced by many factors – its varied landscape and topography, the presence of water resources along its borders, and its historic architecture. Arlington’s distinctive street trees and urban woodlands also play a critical role in Arlington’s appearance, walkability, and environmental health. Increased investments in tree maintenance and replacement, including enough personnel to carry out a comprehensive tree and streetscape management program, will be important for Arlington’s future quality of life. • Arlington’s ability to address critical environmental challenges will hinge, in part, on the policies it adopts to guide and regulate future development, and in particular along the corridor encompassing Massachusetts Avenue and the Mill Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • Worcester Issues – BRP/CERO
    T HE C OMMONWEALTH O F M ASSACHUSETTS E XECUTIVE O FFICE O F E NERGY A ND E NVIRONMENTAL A FFAIRS Department of Agricultural Resources 251 Causeway Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02114 617-626-1700 fax: 617-626-1850 www.mass.gov/agr DEVAL L. PATRICK TIMOTHY P. MURRAY RICHARD K. SULLIVAN JR. SCOTT J. SOARES Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary Commissioner Pursuant to the provisions of the Rights of Way Management Regulations, 333 CMR 11:00, in order to apply herbicides to control vegetation along rights of way, a 5 year Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) and a Yearly Operational Plan (YOP) must be approved by the (DAR) Department of Agricultural Resources. Therefore, notice of receipt of a YOP and procedures for public review is hereby given as required by Section 11.06 (3). A Yearly Operational Plan (YOP) has been submitted for: The Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) Division of Urban Parkways This plan has been prepared by and submitted to the Department by: DCR Division of Urban Parks Mat Thurlow 251 Causeway St. Suite 600 Boston, MA 02114 Areas identified in the YOP as locations where treatment of Rights of Way with herbicides will be carried out in calendar year 2012 are: Town DCR Property South District Treatment Target Treatment Method Boston VFW Grass and Weeds Low pressure boom West Roxbury Pkwy Enneking Pkwy Turtle Pond Pkwy Boston Stony Brook Reservation Brush and Invasives Low pressure Mother Brook Reservation Poison Ivy backpack Chestnut Hill Reservation Brookline Lost Pond Reservation Poison Ivy Low pressure
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of the Metropolitan District Commission
    Public Document No. 48 W$t Commontoealtfj of iWa&sacfmsfetta ANNUAL REPORT OF THE Metropolitan District Commission For the Year 1935 Publication or this Document Approved by the Commission on Administration and Finance lm-5-36. No. 7789 CONTENTS PAGE I. Organization and Administration . Commission, Officers and Employees . II. General Financial Statement .... III. Parks Division—Construction Wellington Bridge Nonantum Road Chickatawbut Road Havey Beach and Bathhouse Garage Nahant Beach Playground .... Reconstruction of Parkways and Boulevards Bridge Repairs Ice Breaking in Charles River Lower Basin Traffic Control Signals IV. Maintenance of Parks and Reservations Revere Beach Division .... Middlesex Fells Division Charles River Lower Basin Division . Bunker Hill Monument .... Charles River Upper Division Riverside Recreation Grounds . Blue Hills Division Nantasket Beach Reservation Miscellaneous Bath Houses Band Concerts Civilian Conservation Corps Federal Emergency Relief Activities . Public Works Administration Cooperation with the Municipalities . Snow Removal V. Special Investigations VI. Police Department VII. Metropolitan Water District and Works Construction Northern High Service Pipe Lines . Reinforcement of Low Service Pipe Lines Improvements for Belmont, Watertown and Arlington Maintenance Precipitation and Yield of Watersheds Storage Reservoirs .... Wachusett Reservoir . Sudbury Reservoir Framingham Reservoir, No. 3 Ashland, Hopkinton and Whitehall Reservoirs and South Sud- bury Pipe Lines and Pumping Station Framingham Reservoirs Nos. 1 and 2 and Farm Pond Lake Cochituate . Aqueducts Protection of the Water Supply Clinton Sewage Disposal Works Forestry Hydroelectric Service Wachusett Station . Sudbury Station Distribution Pumping Station Distribution Reservoirs . Distribution Pipe Lines . T) 11 P.D. 48 PAGE Consumption of Water . 30 Water from Metropolitan Water Works Sources used Outside of the Metropolitan Water District VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 August 24, 2020 Dennis Deziel Acting Regional Administrator EPA
    August 24, 2020 Dennis Deziel Acting Regional Administrator EPA New England Region 1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 Boston, MA 02114‐2023 RE: Petition for a Determination that Certain Commercial, Industrial, Institutional, and Multi-Family Residential Property Dischargers Contribute to Water Quality Standards Violations in the Neponset River Watershed, Massachusetts, and that NPDES Permitting of Such Properties is Required. Dear Regional Administrator Deziel, As the Regional Administrator of the EPA New England Region (“EPA Region 1”), the Conservation Law Foundation (“CLF”) hereby petitions you for a determination pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 122.26(f)(2) that discharges of stormwater that are not currently subject to direct permitting by EPA from privately owned commercial, industrial, institutional,1 and multi‐family residential2 real properties of one acre or greater in the Neponset River Watershed (“Contributing Discharges”) contribute to violations of water quality standards in the Neponset River and require permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”). 1 For the purposes of this Petition, the “institutional” land use category encompasses properties in the MassGIS “Urban Public/Institutional” land use code that are privately owned. 2 For the purposes of this Petition, the “large multi‐family residential” land use category encompasses properties in the MassGIS “Multi‐Family Residential” land use code that are privately owned and include privately owned, include five or more housing units (excluding those in which 50% or more of the units are restricted at 80% Area Median Income or below), and are not currently subject to regulation under the NPDES permit program in order to restore and protect the water quality of the Neponset River watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 !N !N !N !4 !N !N !N !N !N !4 !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !N !Ã !N !N !N !N !N
    M Folly Works Brook c Rd C Prospect Hill B R r 1 i d 0 l r x Wawecus Hill n t H i d o o h ig m t D S g w o P P t in R n R w t s rry Norwich Free Academy S o Norwich Falls Pond r s S i n u t t e e n i c b a v c h n n A R S l a t l w h r R r n e a t w o d C W ! Roc s e kwe R r e ll St h o W o S 7 d d t t B L t th M Choate Brook l t P 8 C r a s a t S t h R Brand R S t h o d d o u l Sherman s r o S i d Lewis Pond d St e a t w t R n W c h B t l s i N e B t t i y K d t Greenville r n R H i c t t ou l y t r e a S Yantic River n e g e e 1 r A i Bates Pond 6 u R i 5 P d l a g n A e l w y t c S R g R t v o t e c D o a r B t P t 5 v e e M H R l e S t n d o l h l o B B e h e S wy c i r 4 16 r r c t S 5 d w d n c r t g d H r K o n h t e A Q o e u o S n i u e n o a ! t v v Folwix Brook d S u o s a in r P o o D d A e L l e t t d a l n l d t e D H S S l e w s r R y Greeneville Elementary School S l e e t m t B T d u i i o a o g R T 2 t D r A l h d e l R v y n l A l s i A n d v n pke r v cket T r l e i d etu e A o a R o Sh R g l t e S B i 2 o e M t k n e 165 d St w R S n dge d r n R d kri T S l s t Oa u V il y r r Yantic St ja d S o n H y d W r e Hickory Street School P m R w s e gs i R i t t v C i l un a n n o A e Y a t s e H O t n r R y Miller Brook g o r v t y t n t Preston Veterans Memorial School S e il D d i t S ! m e e D S A S a C D G R I S W O L D t n u d W H Ol r o t d G h N i n r or a d t wich a r Rd t Greene Ave n s ! R e i m n e l o v o o i S i AQUIFER PRO TECTIO N AREAS u P y R l d w l D D k d R e G T Jail Hill E s Teachers Memorial y Bucki
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic River Watershed INITIATIVE
    Mystic River Watershed INITIATIVE Working together to improve water quality, public access and recreation throughout the watershed. WHAT IS THE INITIATIVE? The EPA Mystic River Watershed Initiative is a collaborative effort with a goal to improve water quality and environmental conditions as well as create and protect open space and public access to the Mystic River and its tributaries through safe public pathways and access points. The Ini- tiative is guided by a steering committee composed of 22 organizations including not-for-profit community groups, local, state, and federal governmental agencies and is co-chaired by U.S. EPA and the Mystic River Watershed Association. WHY IS THE INITIATIVE NEEEDED? The Mystic River Watershed is a collection of rivers, streams, lakes, and ponds that drain and area of approximately 76 square miles and 21 municipalities north of Boston. The Mystic River proper, which flows from the Mystic Lakes in Winchester and Arlington through Medford, Somerville, Everett, Charlestown and Chelsea to Boston Harbor, is one of the great urban rivers of New England and one of the most densely populated urban water riversheds in the country. The river and the watershed that feeds it served as an epicenter of much of the activity from which sprung settlement and economic activity in the colonies: mills, shipyards, and villages. Unfortunately, settlement and industrial activity have not always been kind to the Watershed. As the towns and cities in the watershed developed, fields were replaced with parking lots, footpaths with highways, and pastoral river banks with polluting industrial activity and shipyards with oil storage facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources and Open Space
    8 natural resources & open space IIntroductionntroduction Open spaces and the benefits of natural resources are a treasured commodity within densely developed com- munities. They have value in health, recreation, ecolo- gy, and beauty. The landscape of Arlington is adorned with natural features that have defined, and continue to influence, the location and intensity of the built en- vironment. Lakes and ponds, brooks, wetlands, mead- ows and other protected spaces provide crucial public health and ecological benefits, as well as recreational opportunities. In addition, man-made outdoor struc- tures such as paths, gardens, and playing fields, also factor into the components of open space. mmasteraster pplanlan ggoalsoals fforor nnaturalatural rresourcesesources & Natural and built features all need careful preservation, oopenpen sspacepace maintenance, and integration with continuous devel- opment in Arlington. Actions in Arlington also affect ˚ Use sustainable planning and engineering neighboring towns, and it is important to note that lo- approaches to improve air and water quality, cal policies and practices relating to water and other natural resources have regional consequences. There reduce fl ooding, and enhance ecological must be a focus on irreplaceable land and water re- diversity by managing our natural resources. sources in decisions about where, what, and how much ˚ Mitigate and adapt to climate change. to build in Arlington. ˚ Ensure that Arlington’s neighborhoods, EExistingxisting CConditionsonditions commercial areas, and infrastructure are developed in harmony with natural resource Topography, Geology, and Soils Arlington straddles several geologic and watershed concerns. boundaries that contribute to its varied landscape. The ˚ Value, protect, and enhance the physical beauty west side of town lies within the Coastal Lowlands (also and natural resources of Arlington.
    [Show full text]