DOCSLIB.ORG

Executive Director's Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Executive Director's Report A Review of the Boundaries of Virginia’s Planning Districts Department of Housing and Community Development Commonwealth of Virginia May 2014 A Review of the Boundaries of Virginia’s Planning Districts Purpose The Regional Cooperation Act outlines the duties and responsibilities of the Commonwealth’s twenty-one planning district commissions (PDCs).1 In addition, the Department of Housing and Community Development is required to complete a review of planning district boundaries following each United States decennial census of population.2 This document represents the results of that effort following the release of the 2010 Census data. Creation of Planning Districts In 1968, the General Assembly approved legislation to authorize the creation of planning districts across the state. The Virginia Area Development Act established a statutory framework for the PDCs and directed the Division of State Planning and Community Affairs (DSPCA) to conduct surveys and studies necessary to divide the state into planning districts. 3 DSPCA prepared a preliminary district plan and conducted a series of 22 public hearings across the state. The DSPCA director was given sole authority to make decisions on planning district boundaries with neither the Governor nor the state legislature authorized to have a role in the decision-making process. On July 1, 1969, 22 planning districts encompassing all areas of the Commonwealth were authorized for creation (Attachment 1). During the next twenty years, there were no changes in PDC boundaries. In 1990, a major revision occurred through the merger of the Peninsula PDC and the Southeastern Virginia PDC to form the current Hampton Roads PDC. This merger reduced the number of planning districts to twenty-one, and was completed because local governments in the two planning districts decided it would be in their best interest to combine into a single district. Every eligible locality in the two districts became a charter member of the Hampton Roads PDC. No subsequent change to planning district boundaries has occurred since, and the current PDC boundaries are shown on Attachment 2. Special legislation was passed in 1985 that permitted localities to hold dual memberships in PDCs. 4 Presently six localities hold joint PDC memberships, as shown in the table below. These dual memberships reflect the changing natures of these localities which have developed 1 Code of Virginia, Title 15.2, Chapter 42. 2 Code of Virginia, § 36-139.7. 3 Chapter 224, 1968 Acts of Assembly. 4 Code of Virginia, § 15.2-4220 1 economic, social and physical ties to rapidly urbanizing areas that border them on one side and more rural localities that form another border. Locality Located within Planning District: Also a member of: Charles City County Richmond Regional PDC Crater PDC Chesterfield County Richmond Regional PDC Crater PDC Franklin County West Piedmont PDC Roanoke Valley-Alleghany RC Gloucester County Middle Peninsula PDC Hampton Roads PDC Surry County Crater PDC Hampton Roads PDC Town of Rocky Mount West Piedmont PDC Roanoke Valley-Alleghany RC Regional Cooperation Act In 1995, the General Assembly modified the Area Development Act through adoption of the Regional Cooperation Act. The Act places a renewed emphasis on PDCs providing a forum for state and local government to address issues of a regional nature, calling on PDCs to play an important role in encouraging regional cooperation and coordination. Section 36-139.7(a) of the Act outlines the requirements for reviewing PDC. A boundary review is required to be conducted by DHCD following every United States decennial census of population or upon the request of a member jurisdiction of a planning district. Upon concluding such reviews, any recommended adjustment to planning district boundaries are subject to the provisions of the Administrative Process Act (Va. Code §§ 2.2-4000 et seq.). Public Comment DHCD sought public comments to determine whether planning district stakeholders desired a change in planning district boundaries. In late October 2012, notices requesting public comment were emailed to chief local elected officials, chief local government administrators, state agencies, VACo, VML, and PDC directors and chairmen. (Attachment 3). The notice was also published in the November 22, 2012 edition of the Virginia Register. Written comments were requested by December 19, 2012. All of the comments voiced a preference for retaining the current PDC boundaries. Responding entities are noted in Attachment 4. Eleven localities responded, representing eight planning districts. Three PDCs also provided written comment. In addition, DHCD surveyed state agencies to determine the impact upon them if PDC boundaries were adjusted, and the responses are summarized in Attachment 5. The survey revealed that 20 of the 34 agencies responding use their own geographic regions for service delivery or data collection, and only 12 responded that they utilize PDC boundaries for such. In addition, agencies expressed concern that changing boundaries could limit the ability to compare data over time periods, and that splitting Metropolitan Planning Organizations should be avoided due to their close relationships with PDCs. Finally, the Department of Taxation 2 noted that the PDC boundaries for the Hampton Roads and Northern Virginia PDCs define special taxes collected under the transportation legislation that was approved in 2013. The second phase of review, a series of public information meetings, was not conducted due to the lack of interest expressed in changing PDC boundaries. DHCD did not receive any request to hold a public hearing to discuss boundary adjustments. Population Analysis A review of population data reveals that the three large urban PDCs (Northern Virginia, Hampton Roads, and Richmond Regional) all have a population of at least one million people, and combined they account for 61% of the state’s population. This is an increase from 55% for the same statistic in 1970, the census immediately following the establishment of the PDC boundaries. (See Attachment 6 for populations of each PDC from 1970 through 2010.) The remaining eighteen PDCs each represent a range of 0.6% to 4.1% of the state’s population. Two planning districts had a population under 50,000 in 2010 (Accomack-Northampton and Northern Neck), and five PDCs had a population of less than 150,000, but greater than 50,000 (Southside, Middle Peninsula, LENOWISCO, Commonwealth Regional, and Cumberland Plateau.) The remaining eleven PDCs have populations between 150,000 and 350,000. Between 2000 and 2010, six of the 21 PDCs experienced population growth in excess of 10 percent (George Washington, Rappahannock-Rapidan, Northern Virginia, Northern Shenandoah Valley, Thomas Jefferson, and Richmond Regional). These six PDCs accounted for 80% of the state’s population growth during that period. Four of the Commonwealth’s PDCs lost population (West Piedmont, Southside, Cumberland Plateau, and Accomack-Northampton), with the Accomack-Northampton PDC decreasing the most, at 12.5% during that decade. The George Washington Regional Commission has consistently experienced a higher degree of population growth than any of the other PDCs, and has an appreciably higher population than the other smaller PDCs. Its population grew by 26.5% between 2000 and 2010, for a 2010 population of 327,773, and the region’s population has increased more than fourfold since 1970, when it had a population of 77,425. Despite the rapid growth in this region, it still has a significantly smaller population than the next largest PDC, Richmond Regional, which has a population of over one million. The next most populous PDC following George Washington is Central Shenandoah, with a population of 286,781. PDC Boundary Review Criteria The Regional Cooperation Act identifies several criteria to be considered by DHCD in conducting any boundary review. These criteria are discussed in the sections below. Communities of Interest/Common economic and market interests. Many planning districts consist of multiple jurisdictions surrounding an urban core, and naturally share common interests because of the economic interdependence of the urban core and the 3 outlying areas. There are also shared interests in the rural PDCs where agricultural activities predominate; however those commonalities can become distorted when one member jurisdiction begins to experience urbanization that originating from a neighboring PDC. As noted previously, several localities that have experienced this phenomenon have opted for dual PDC membership. With respect to other interests, the existing PDC boundaries adequately represent common interests with respect to environmental and social interests as well. Ease of communications and commissioner travel time. A cursory review of the state’s largest planning districts in area (Central Shenandoah, Commonwealth Regional, and Mount Rogers) demonstrates that the seat of government for the cities and counties served is usually about a half hour drive to the PDC headquarters. For three localities in those areas, Highland, Bath, and Carroll Counties, the county seat is located about an hour away from their respective PDC offices.5 Despite this distance, there is no other logical PDC to which these counties could be reassigned, and no comments were received about this issue during the public comment period. Metropolitan Statistical Area boundaries. The federal Office of Management and Budget designates metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah Valley, Virginia
    Shenandoah Valley, Virginia VIRGINIA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP www.YesVirginia.org Community Profile Shenandoah Valley State Map Only a few locations can guarantee the right combination of resources that are crucial to your business’s success. Virginia’s premier location offers excellent domestic and international access. Centrally located on the U.S. East Coast, 40 percent of the U.S. population is within a day’s drive, and our integrated transportation system of highways, railroads, airports and seaports ensures that you can reach every one of your markets efficiently. Close proximity to Washington, D.C. facilitates contact with policy makers and the federal government system. Virginia continues to rank among America’s leading states for business by CNBC and Forbes.com. Business-first values, easy access to markets, stable and competitive operating costs, and a talented workforce all drove Virginia to the top. This unique combination of assets has encouraged businesses to prosper here for more than 400 years. Like you, they searched the world over for that convergence of resources that would help ensure their prosperity. For them, their search ended here. Chances are yours will too. • AAA bond rating- Virginia has maintained a AAA rating since 1938, longer than any other state. • Right-to-work law allows individuals the right to work regardless of membership in a labor union or organization. • Corporate income tax rate of 6% has not been increased since 1972. • Headquarters to 35 Fortune 1000 firms. • Headquarters to 52 firms each with annual revenue over $1 billion. • More than 17,300 high-tech establishments operate in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • July 1, 2013 Population Estimates for Virginia and Its Counties and Cities
    July 1, 2013 Population Estimates for Virginia and its Counties and Cities Published on January 27, 2014 by the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service Demographics Research Group www.coopercenter.org/demographics/ Change since 2010 Census FIPS Code Locality April 1, 2010 Census July 1, 2013 Estimate Numeric Change Percent Change Virginia 8,001,024 8,260,405 259,381 3.2% 001 Accomack County 33,164 33,612 448 1.4% 003 Albemarle County 98,970 102,731 3,761 3.8% 005 Alleghany County 16,250 15,961 -289 -1.8% 007 Amelia County 12,690 12,759 69 0.5% 009 Amherst County 32,353 32,476 123 0.4% 011 Appomattox County 14,973 15,270 297 2.0% 013 Arlington County 207,627 227,146 19,519 9.4% 015 Augusta County 73,750 74,504 754 1.0% 017 Bath County 4,731 4,756 25 0.5% 019 Bedford County 74,898 76,309 1,411 1.9% 021 Bland County 6,824 6,768 -56 -0.8% 023 Botetourt County 33,148 33,423 275 0.8% 025 Brunswick County 17,434 17,275 -159 -0.9% 027 Buchanan County 24,098 23,867 -231 -1.0% 029 Buckingham County 17,146 17,185 39 0.2% 031 Campbell County 54,842 56,136 1,294 2.4% 033 Caroline County 28,545 29,481 936 3.3% 035 Carroll County 30,042 29,462 -580 -1.9% 036 Charles City County 7,256 7,268 12 0.2% 037 Charlotte County 12,586 12,497 -89 -0.7% 041 Chesterfield County 316,236 326,950 10,714 3.4% 043 Clarke County 14,034 14,148 114 0.8% 045 Craig County 5,190 5,305 115 2.2% 047 Culpeper County 46,689 48,223 1,534 3.3% 049 Cumberland County 10,052 10,191 139 1.4% FIPS Code Locality April 1, 2010 Census July 1, 2013 Estimate Numeric Change Percent Change
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    6. Functlon or Uw Historic Functions (enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (enter categories from instructions) SEE CONTINUATION SHEET - PAGE 1 7. Descrlptlon Architectural Classification Materials (enter categories from instructions) (enter categories from instructions) STONE SEE CONTINUATION SHEET - PAGE 1 foundation walls WOOD: loa, weatherboard; BRICK; STONE: limestone rwf METAL other WOOD Describe present and historic physical appearance. SIIMWARY DESCRIPTION The Newtown/Stephensburg Historic District is located in the town of Stephens City, in Frederick County, Virginia. Stephens City was chartered in 1758 and is the second oldest town in the Shenandoah Valley after Winchester. Its location along the Valley Pike greatly influenced its growth and development. The historic district encompasses a large portion of the town limits and contains a diversity of building styl&s and types ranging from the town's earliest history to the present day. The boundaries generally include all of the buildings facing Main Street and extend one block to the east and west. The architectural resources in the district include several mid-to late-eighteenth- century vernacular log dwellings. The district also contains a large number of early-to mid-nineteenth-century and late-nineteenth-century dwellings and churches. In addition, there are examples of early-twentieth-century dwellings, commercial buildings, and schools. The architectural styles represented in the district include: vernacular eighteenth-century log dwellings with late- nineteenth-century Folk Victorian details; Federal; Greek Revival; Gothic Revival; Italianate; Queen Anne; Colonial Revival; Bungalow/Craftsman; and vernacular I-houses. ARCHITECTURAL ANALYSIS The area now known as Stephens City was originally settled around 1734 by Peter Stephens, one of a group of people who journeyed down from Pennsylvania with Joist Hite in 1732 and settled in the northern Shenandoah Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenandoah National Park Virginia
    A fact sheet from 2017 The Pew Charitable Trusts $191,000 is needed to repair one of the park’s two surviving Civilian Conservation Corps buildings, which date to the Great Depression. The Pew Charitable Trusts Shenandoah National Park Virginia Overview Over a million people enter Shenandoah National Park’s gates each year, most taking the Skyline Drive to vantage points along 105 miles of the Blue Ridge Mountains. The 200,000-acre park tracks the spine of the mountains in the northwestern corner of Virginia. From pullouts or granite peaks accessed by more than a dozen hiking trails, visitors have spectacular views of the state’s Piedmont region and Shenandoah Valley—particularly during peak fall foliage. Shenandoah is an early example of environmental planning and design in the National Park System. In the early 1900s, people living as far away as Washington built summer retreats here. When the park was established in 1935, more than 10,000 boys and young men in the Civilian Conservation Corps tore down most of these structures and nearly all homes built by early European settlers to create a more natural setting. They also carved trails—which now span over 500 miles—and built other park infrastructure. The park encompasses parts of eight counties and its restoration has allowed Congress to designate roughly 40 percent of it as wilderness areas. That wilderness draws scientists conducting ecological research ranging from bear behavior to the effects of acid rain, in addition to hikers. Unfortunately, Shenandoah faces a maintenance backlog of over $90 million, more than half of which is for road repairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Identity of a Northern Shenandoah Valley Cabinetmaking Shop
    A Southern Backcountry Mystery: Uncovering the Identity of a Northern Shenandoah Valley Cabinetmaking Shop by Patricia Long-Jarvis B.A. in Art History, December 1980, Scripps College A Thesis submitted to The Faculty of The Columbian College of Arts and Sciences of The George Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts January 8, 2021 Thesis directed by Oscar P. Fitzgerald Adjunct Professional Lecturer of Decorative Arts & Design History i © Copyright 2020 by Patricia Long-Jarvis All rights reserved ii Dedication I wish to dedicate this thesis to my husband, Jim, our four children—James, Will, Garen, and Kendall—and my sister, Jennifer, for their unfailing support and belief in me. I am eternally grateful to Jim for his patience and providing the time and space away from our family while I researched the Newbrough & Hendricks story. Jim’s absolute love and unwavering confidence are why I completed this study. iii Acknowledgments The author wishes to thank the following individuals and institutions for their support and assistance in making this thesis a reality. My professor, mentor, and thesis advisor, Dr. Oscar P. Fitzgerald, who inspired my love for American furniture, and insisted from the beginning that I write a thesis versus taking a comprehensive exam. For the past three years, Oscar has patiently awaited the delivery of my thesis, and never lost his enthusiasm for the study. I will always be profoundly grateful for his wisdom, guidance, and confidence in me, and all I have learned from him as a teacher, scholar, and thesis advisor.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Warren County, Virginia
    Rivers of Opportunity– Mountains of Success Welcome to Where is Warren County? Warren County is centrally located in the Northern Warren County, Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. It is bordered by Frederick and Clarke Counties on the north, Fauquier and Virginia Rappahannock Counties on the east, Page County to the south, and Shenandoah County to the west. Warren Population: 38,829 County has a total land area of nearly 217.86 square miles. The rural part of the County contains 207.36 square miles and the Town of Front Royal covers 10.5 square miles. The Nestled in the Shenandoah Valley on the eastern edge of the Blue County is bounded by the Blue Ridge Mountains, which Ridge Mountains, Warren County's impressive mix of natural encompasses part of the Shenandoah National Park and beauty, history, small town allure and modern convenience make Skyline Drive on the east and the Massanutten Mountains, it an excellent place to raise a family or operate a business. which encompasses part of the George Washington Located at the confluence of the North and South Forks of the National Forest on the south and west. These two mountain renowned Shenandoah River, the County offers opportunities for ridges visually dominate the County’s landscape, looming boating, kayaking and canoeing from its many boat launches and is 1,000 to 2,900 feet over the central lowland. a premier freshwater fishing destination. Warren County is also the gateway to the Shenandoah National Park and Skyline Drive which provides spectacular views of the countryside, South Fork of the Shenandoah River, and George Washington National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Railroad Building in Virginia (1827 to 1860)
    Railroad Building in Virginia (1827 to 1860) Virginia History Series #10-08 © 2008 Major Railroads in Virginia (from 1827-1860) • Baltimore and Ohio (1827) – Winchester & Potomac (at Harpers Ferry) – Winchester & Strasburg • South Side or “Petersburg & -- North Western to Lynchburg RR” (1849-54) Parkersburg, WV • Richmond & Danville (1847-1856) • Manassas Gap (1850-54) • Petersburg & Roanoke (river in NC) • Orange & Alexandria (1848) (1833) -- Richmond & Petersburg (1838) • Virginia Central (1836) -- Blue Ridge (1858) • Norfolk and Petersburg (1853) • Virginia & Tennessee (1850s) • Seaboard & Roanoke (river in NC) or “Portsmouth and Weldon RR” (1835) • Richmond, Fredericksburg, and Potomac to Alexandria (1834) & Fredericksburg & Charlottesville RR Major RR Routes in Virginia by 1860 Wheeling●, Ohio River Parkersburg ● ● Grafton Maryland & York RR+ + ++++++/ + Norfolk Stn + Petersburg & + Norfolk RR + + + + Suffolk Stn + + Bristol ● + + + + Norfolk & + Roanoke RR Weldon ■ On March 8, 1827, the Commonwealth of Virginia joined Maryland in giving the Baltimore and Ohio Rail Road (B&O RR) the task of building a railroad from the port of Baltimore, MD West to a suitable point on the Ohio River. The railroad was intended to provide a faster route for Midwestern goods to reach the East Coast than the successful Erie Canal across upstate NY. Construction began on July 4th, 1828. It was decided to follow the Patapsco River to a point near where the railroad would cross the “fall line” and descend into the valley of the Monocacy and Potomac Rivers. Thomas Viaduct (on the B&O RR) spans the Patapsco River and Patapsco Valley between Relay and Elkridge, MD (1833-35) It was the largest bridge in the nation and today its still the world's oldest multiple arched stone railroad bridge Further extensions of the B&O RR soon opened to Frederick and Point of Rocks on the Potomac river.
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______
    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 _____________________ CONTENTS Agriculture and Land Use ................................................................................................................3 Appalachian Studies.........................................................................................................................8 Archaeology and Physical Anthropology ......................................................................................14 Architecture, Historic Buildings, Historic Sites ............................................................................18 Arts and Crafts ..............................................................................................................................21 Biography .......................................................................................................................................27 Civil War, Military.........................................................................................................................29 Coal, Industry, Labor, Railroads, Transportation ..........................................................................37 Description and Travel, Recreation and Sports .............................................................................63 Economic Conditions, Economic Development, Economic Policy, Poverty ................................71 Education .......................................................................................................................................82
    [Show full text]
  • Early Settlers: Their Laws, Morals, Etc
    CHAPTER I Country west of the Blue Ridge, and the first settlers of Southwest Virginia – Their trouble with the Indians – Frontier warfare – Gradual formation of the various counties until 1861 – Primitive life of the early settlers: their laws, morals, etc. SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA AND SHENANDOAH VALLEY The Blue Ridge Mountains, as a landmark, have played an important part in Virginia’s history. Long before the fertile valleys and mineral hills west of these mountains were discovered, or the gaze of the white man rested upon New River, the eastern portion of the State had some 80,000 people, and Shenandoah Valley three or four hundred souls. The forefathers of the latter came into this valley by way of Harper’s Ferry from Pennsylvania, of whom we shall have more to say in the second part of this work. The threading of the labyrinth of Rosamond’s bower could scarcely have been more difficult than the tracing of the footsteps of these earlier settlers, in any chronological order, who first came into that country now known as Southwest Virginia. The want of all records, which the early settlers failed to preserve, reduces the chronicler of events to groping in the dark, and learning from uncertain sounds the paths trod by our forefathers. Several reasons may be assigned for this unfortunate state of affairs. The primitive, struggling life of those earlier pioneers was not conducive to the recordation of events, and the constant destruction of their settlements by the Indians was often a clean sweep, where the inhabitants could not even escape with their lives, to say nothing of records, if any were preserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Shenandoah Valley
    SShheennaannddooaahh VVaalllleeyy RReeggiioonn Average travel Primary Purpose of Trip party spending: Visit friends/relatives 44% Other 2% 14% Outdoor recreation $616 3.7 Business 10% per trip in 4% Virginia Nights 15% per trip Personal 11% business Entertainment/ Other sightseeing pleasure/ personal Top Activities: Travel Party Spending Shopping 30 % Visiting relatives 28 % Rural sightseeing 24 % $0 2% Historic sites/Churches 22 % $1 to less than $100 23% Museums 19 % $100 to less than $250 20% Visiting friends 18 % Fine dining 16 % $250 to less than $500 21% National park/Monuments 14 % $500 to less than $750 11% State park/Monuments 13 % $750 to less than $1000 5% Hiking/Backpacking 12 % $1000+ 19% Travel Party Travel Party Origin by State Origin by DMA VA 38 % Washington, DC (Hagerstown) 23 % MD 8 % Roanoke-Lynchburg 8 % WV 7 % Richmond-Petersburg 8 % NC 6 % Norfolk-Portsmouth-Newport News 5 % PA 6 % New York 5 % NY 6 % Philadelphia 4 % FL 3 % Baltimore 3 % SC 3 % Greensboro-High Point-Winston Salem 2 % NJ 2 % Charlotte 2 % CA 2 % Bluefield-Beckley-Oak Hill 2 % 25-34 63 % 29 % 22% Married Traveling with Children 35-44 18-24 14% 16% Average Age: 45 2.7 36% Average travel Annual 19% 15% 45-54 party size household 65+ income of 100K or more 15% 55-64 Planning Month of Travel Sources 21% 12% January 7% February 3% March 7% Destination Search website April 9% engine May 9% 31% June 11% July 12% August 8% Use information % September 9% from friends and 10 relatives. October 11% November 7% Travel provider 10% website (airline, December 8% hotel, etc.) Planning Time 87 % Travel by owned auto or rental cars 43% consider visiting Virginia less than a month before their visit 6% 52% decide visiting Virginia less Travel by plane than a month before their visit Top 10 Most Visited Cities Top 10 States Plan to Visit for Leisure in Next 2 Years 25% 22% 21% 19% 19% 18% 18% 45 % 31 % 28 % 15% 15% 14% Virginia Florida Maryland 28% 24 % 18 % North Washington Pennsylvania rg d le .C ke r h ia x l u n il D o te c dr fa ya Carolina D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia's Shenandoah Valley and Blue Ridge Views
    Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley and Blue Ridge Views Featuring two National Scenic Byways – Skyline Drive and the Blue Ridge Parkway 4 Day / 3 Night Package Day One Traveling into Virginia ‘s storied Shenandoah Valley you will enter Shenandoah National Park and travel historic Skyline Drive, a designated National Scenic Byway, to your lodging host for the next two nights - Skyland Surrounded by the peaks along the crests of the Blue Ridge Mountains, your accommodations offer a peaceful setting with views of the lush mountain forests or the green and of the Shenandoah Valley below. After checking into your rooms, enjoy a leisurely dinner in the Pollock Dining Room. Then relax with a “specialty” drink in the Mountain Taproom with family friendly entertainment available to all guests. Day Two Arrive at internationally famous Luray Caverns. Discover Eastern America’s largest and most popular caverns, a U.S. Natural Landmark noted for the profuse variety of formations and unsurpassed natural color. From well-lighted, stone columns and crystal-clear pools. Also, hear the haunting sounds of the world’. Experience the history of America in the adjacent Car & Carriage Caravan Museum which houses an original items related to transportation including cars, carriages, coaches and costumes dating from 1725. Return to Skyland for an evening of food and fun entertainment. Day Three After breakfast depart for Charlottesville, Virginia to visit one of America‘s most fascinating homes, Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello. View many of our third President’s inventions and original furnishings in this architectural masterpiece. After lunch on your own, tour the James Monroe’s Ash Lawn-Highland before continuing to another National Scenic Byway - the Blue Ridge Parkway.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Shenandoah Valley
    REGION 7 Northern Shenandoah Valley Seven Bends State Park | Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation CHAPTER 13 Regional Recommendations Region 7 • Northern Shenandoah Valley Introduction Table 7.2 Top 10 Outdoor Recreation Activities By Participation The Northern Shenandoah Valley Recreational Planning region includes the counties of Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah and Northern Shenandoah Recreational Planning Region Warren, the city of Winchester and the towns of Berryville, Boyce, % Middletown, Stephens City, Luray, Shenandoah, Stanley, Edinburg, activity Mount Jackson, New Market, Strasburg, Toms Brook, Woodstock household and Front Royal. The region sits in the northwest corner of Virginia Visiting natural areas 71 between the Blue Ridge Mountains and Great North Mountain of the Appalachian chain. Massanutten Mountain is located in the Walking for pleasure 68 heart of the region. All the jurisdictions in this region are part of the Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Heritage Area. Driving for pleasure 65 Regional Focus Visiting parks (local, state & national) 61 Swimming/outdoor pool 50 Table 7.1 Most-Needed Outdoor Recreation Opportunities Gardening 41 Northern Shenandoah Recreational Planning Region Freshwater fishing 38 % of households in Sunbathing/relaxing on a beach 34 activity region state Visiting working farms, petting zoos, 34 Natural areas 61 54 corn mazes, etc. Trails 47 43 Visiting gardens/arboretums 33 Parks 43 49 Source: 2017 Virginia Outdoors Demand Survey. Visit www.dcr.virginia.gov/vop to view regional participation rates for more than 100 activities. Water access 34 43 Historic areas 31 39 Regional Featured Projects Scenic drives To be considered a regional featured project, a project must meet 29 29 (driving for pleasure) at least one of the following criteria: Playing fields, sports and golf 13 22 • Has statewide or regional significance.
    [Show full text]