Ultrastructure of the Mature Spermatozoa of Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY 258:179–192 (2003) Ultrastructure of the Mature Spermatozoa of Caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) David M. Scheltinga,1 Mark Wilkinson,2 Barrie G.M. Jamieson,1 and Oommen V. Oommen3 1Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, 4072, Australia 2Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK 3Department of Zoology, University of Kerala, Kariavattom, 695 581, Trivandrum, India ABSTRACT The spermatozoa of Gymnophiona show the study. However, some caecilian species, such as the following autapomorphies: 1) penetration of the distal cen- aquatic Typhlonectes natans, are often available triole by the axial fiber; 2) presence of an acrosomal base- commercially through the pet trade, and at least plate; 3) presence of an acrosome seat (flattened apical end some terrestrial species are known to be locally of nucleus); and 4) absence of juxta-axonemal fibers. The wide separation of the plasma membrane bounding the abundant, offering improved opportunities for eco- undulating membrane is here also considered to be apo- logical as well as morphological study (e.g., Oommen morphic. Three plesiomorphic spermatozoal characters et al., 2000; Measey et al., 2001). are recognized that are not seen in other Amphibia but The only caecilian spermatozoon that has been occur in basal amniotes: 1) presence of mitochondria with examined ultrastructurally is that of Typhlonectes a delicate array of concentric cristae (concentric cristae of natans (Typhlonectidae) (van der Horst and van der salamander spermatozoa differ in lacking the delicate ar- Merwe, 1991; van der Horst et al., 1991). Until re- ray); 2) presence of peripheral dense fibers associated with cently, light microscope observations had been re- the triplets of the distal centriole; and 3) presence of a simple annulus (a highly modified, elongate annulus is ported for just five other taxa, Ichthyophis glu- present in salamander sperm). The presence of an endo- tinosus (Ichthyophiidae), Uraeotyphlus narayani nuclear canal containing a perforatorium is a plesiomor- (Uraeotyphlidae), Siphonops annulatus (Caecili- phic feature of caecilian spermatozoa that is shared with idae), and Gegeneophis carnosus (Caeciliidae) by Se- urodeles, some basal anurans, sarcopterygian fish, and shachar (1939, 1940, 1943, 1945), and Chthonerpe- some amniotes. Spermatozoal synapomorphies are identi- ton indistinctum (Typhlonectidae) by de Sa and fied for 1) the Uraeotyphlidae and Ichthyophiidae, and 2) Berois (1986). Owing to changes in caecilian taxon- the Caeciliidae and Typhlonectidae, suggesting that the omy and an absence of known voucher specimens, members of each pair of families are more closely related to each other than to other caecilians. Although caecilian the specific, although not the generic, identity of the spermatozoa exhibit the clear amphibian synapomorphy material referred to by Seshachar as I. glutinosus, of the unilateral location of the undulating membrane and G. carnosus, and perhaps also U. narayani must be its axial fiber, they have no apomorphic characters that considered uncertain. Recently, Wake (1994) has suggest a closer relationship to either the Urodela or greatly augmented the number of caecilians (22 gen- Anura. J. Morphol. 258:179–192, 2003. era, 29 species, representing all families) examined © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. for spermatozoal morphology using light micros- copy. Unfortunately, due to the age and fixation of KEY WORDS: Gegeneophis; Ichthyophis; Typhlonectes; some of the samples used by Wake (1994), major Uraeotyphlus; spermatozoa; phylogeny features of spermatozoal morphology, such as the presence or absence of an undulating membrane, were often uncertain. Furthermore, important fea- Caecilians (Gymnophiona) are one of the three tures such as the structure of the acrosome or the orders of extant Amphibia. They are relatively poorly known snake or worm-like limbless amphib- ians. Approximately 160 species, 32 genera, and six families of these distinctive amphibians are cur- Contract grant sponsors: Department of Zoology and Entomology (Research Grant to DMS), Australian Research Council (to BGMJ), rently recognized, although the lower-level taxon- the Natural Environment Research Council; Contract grant number: omy of the group is not stable (Nussbaum and GST/02/832 (to MW). Wilkinson, 1989). Given that the group has a pri- marily tropical distribution and the majority of spe- *Correspondence to: David Scheltinga, Department of Zoology and cies are fossorial, it is perhaps not surprising that Entomology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4072. knowledge of many aspects of caecilian biology lag E-mail: [email protected] behind that of frogs (Anura) and salamanders (Urodela). The single biggest obstacle to advances in caecilian biology has been the paucity of material for DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10139 © 2003 WILEY-LISS, INC. 180 D.M SCHELTINGA ET AL. occurrence of axial and/or juxta-axonemal fibers rinsed in 0.1 M PB, postfixed for 80 min in similarly buffered 1% were not determinable by the techniques employed osmium tetroxide, rinsed in buffer, dehydrated through an as- cending ethanol series (20–100%), and infiltrated and embedded by Wake (1994). in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Spurr, 1969). The present account is the first ultrastructural Sections were cut with diamond knives on an LKB 2128 UM IV description of mature spermatozoa of representa- microtome. Thin sections, 50–80 nm thick, were collected on tives of the caecilian families Ichthyophiidae (Ich- carbon stabilized, colloidin-coated, 200 m mesh copper grids, thyophis beddomei and I. tricolor), Uraeotyphlidae stained for 30 sec in Reynolds’ lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963), rinsed in distilled water, then placed in 6% aqueous uranyl ace- (three forms, probably distinct species, of Uraeo- tate for 4 min, rinsed in distilled water, and stained for a further typhlus), and Caeciliidae (Gegeneophis rama- 2 min in lead citrate before final rinsing (Daddow, 1986). Electron swamii). The spermatozoa of Typhlonectes natans micrographs were taken on a Hitachi 300 electron microscope at (Typhlonectidae) is reexamined in order to obtain 75 kV. Light microscopic observations and photographs of sper- matozoa, from glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue squashes, were made more detail of its structure. Description of sperma- using an Olympus BH2 microscope with Nomarski interference tozoal ultrastructure in four of the six currently contrast and an attached OM-2 camera. recognized caecilian families allows a preliminary discussion of caecilian interrelationships based on spermatozoal characters. RESULTS Spermatozoa of Ichthyophis and MATERIALS AND METHODS Uraeotyphlus Caecilians used in this study were collected from synanthropic Examination of the spermatozoa of all three spe- cultivated habitats in the Western Ghats regions of Kerala, cies of Uraeotyphlus, and the two species of Ichthyo- Southern India, with the exception of a single specimen of the South American Typhlonectes natans (Fischer, 1880 “1879”) phis, revealed no difference in ultrastructure within which was obtained commercially and is believed to have come a genus; however, differences in dimensions (Table from Colombia. Voucher specimens of all Indian caecilians are 1) of the spermatozoa were detected between species deposited in the collection of the Department of Zoology, Univer- and give some support to the proposition that at sity of Kerala, as follows. least Uraeotyphlus A and B are distinct species. Due Gegeneophis ramaswamii Taylor, 1964: MW 79 collected at Bonaccord, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala (08°40Ј46.3ЉN, to the small number of mature spermatozoa present 77°10Ј08.6ЉE, 593m asl) on 14 October 1999; MW 180-182 col- in the testis material of Uraeotyphlus C, no mea- lected either at Bonaccord or Thekkada, Thiruvananthapuram, surements were obtained for this species. Kerala (08°37Ј43.1ЉN, 76°57Ј38.1ЉE, 60m asl) in either 1998 or The general structure of the spermatozoa of Ich- 1999. Ichthyophis beddomei Peters, 1880 “1879”: MW 283, collected thyophis tricolor, I. beddomei, and Uraeotyphlus at Thalapuzha, Wayanad, Kerala (11°49Ј59.4ЉN, 75°57Ј53.6ЉE, species A, B, and C is sufficiently similar to be de- 700m asl) on 21 October 1999. Ichthyophis beddomei is a poorly scribed together, while noting the few observed dif- circumscribed species. The type specimen may be lost (Taylor, ferences between the two genera. The spermatozoa 1968) and it is unclear that all reports of this species actually are filiform and under light microscopy the acrosome pertain to the taxon described by Peters (1879). The type locality, the Nilghiris Hills, is ϳ60 km from Thalapuzha and of similar and nucleus appear as distinct structures, with a altitude. MW 283 fits the current but probably poorly refined rounded acrosome tip (Fig. 1A,E). Distinction can be concepts of this species (Taylor, 1968; Pillai and Ravichandran, made between the differing midpieces of the two 1999) reasonably well. However, the assignment of MW 283 to I. genera at the light microscope level. The midpiece of beddomei is with the caveat that it might be affected by any future revision of I. beddomei. Ichthyophis tricolor Annandale, Ichthyophis appears homogeneous, whereas that of 1909: MW 127, collected at Kollamom, Thiruvananthapuram, Uraeotyphlus has spherical mitochondria which re- Kerala (08°32Ј21.8ЉN, 77°06Ј37.9ЉE, 139m asl) on 14 October semble a cluster of grapes (racemose arrangement). 1999; MW 183-4, collected at Thekkada, Thiruvananthapuram,