DOCSLIB.ORG

A Checklist of Amphibia of India with IUCN Red List Status K.P

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Checklist of Amphibia of India with IUCN Red List Status K.P A Checklist of Amphibia of India with IUCN Red list Status K.P. Dinesh1, C. Radhakrishnan2, K.V. Gururaja3, K. Deuti4 and G. Bhatta5 Updated till April 2013 (Online Version) 1 Southern Regional Centre, Zoological Survey of India, Chennai-600028, Tamil Nadu, India. 2 33/5267-D, Devika, Golf links Road, Chevayur, Calicut – 673 017, Kerala, India. 3 Centre for infrastructure, Sustainable Transportation and Urban Planning (CiSTUP) Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore - 560012, Karnataka, India. 4 Zoological Survey of India, Amphibia Section, Spirit Building, 27 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Kolkata 700016, West Bengal, India. 5 Department of Biology, BASE Educational Services Pvt. Ltd, Basavanagudi, Bangalore, 560 004, India. 1 Zoological Survey of India Systematic list* CLASS: AMPHIBIA Gray ORDER: ANURA Fischer von Waldheim FAMILY: BUFONIDAE Gray Sl. Species IUCN Red List No. Global Status# 1 Bufoides meghalayanus (Yazdani and Chanda 1971) EN 2 Bufotes latastii (Boulenger 1882) LC 3 Duttaphrynus beddomii (Gunther, 1875) EN 4 Duttaphrynus brevirostris (Rao, 1937) DD 5 Duttaphrynus himalayanus (Gunther 1864) LC 6 Duttaphrynus hololius (Gunther, 1876) DD 7 Duttaphrynus kiphirensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 8 Duttaphrynus mamitensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 9 Duttaphrynus manipurensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 10 Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider 1799) LC 11 Duttaphrynus microtympanum (Boulenger 1882) VU 12 Duttaphrynus mizoramensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 13 Duttaphrynus nagalandensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 14 Duttaphrynus olivaceous (Blanford, 1874) LC 15 Duttaphrynus parietalis (Boulenger, 1882) NT 16 Duttaphrynus scaber (Schneider, 1799) LC 17 Duttaphrynus silentvalleyensis (Pillai, 1982) DD 18 Duttaphrynus stomaticus (Lutken 1862) LC 19 Duttaphrynus stuarti (Smith, 1929) DD 20 Duttaphrynus wokhaensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 21 Ghatophryne ornata (Gunther, 1876) EN 22 Ghatophryne rubigina (Pillai and Pattabiraman, 1981) VU 23 Ingerophrynus macrotis (Boulenger, 1887) LC 24 Pedostibes kempi (Boulenger 1919) DD 25 Pedostibes tuberculosus Gunther 1875 EN 2 Zoological Survey of India 26 Xanthophryne koynayensis (Soman, 1963) EN 27 Xanthophryne tigerinus Biju, Bocxlaer, Giri, Loader and CE Bossuyt, 2009 FAMILY: DICROGLOSSIDAE Anderson 28 Allopaa barmoachensis (Khan and Tasnim, 1989) NE 29 Allopaa hazarensis (Dubois and Khan, 1989) LC 30 Chrysopaa sternosignata (Murray, 1885) LC 31 Euphlyctis aloysii Joshy, Alam, Kurabayashi, Sumida and NE Kuramoto, 2009 32 Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis (Schneider, 1799) LC 33 Euphlyctis ghoshi (Chanda, 1990) DD 34 Euphlyctis hexadactylus (Lesson, 1834) LC 35 Euphlyctis mudigere Joshy, Alam, Kurabayashi, Sumida and NE Kuramoto, 2009 36 Fejervarya andamanensis (Stoliczka, 1870) LC 37 Fejervarya cancrivora (Gravenhorst, 1829) LC 38 Fejervarya nicobariensis (Stoliczka, 1870) EN 39 Fejervarya orissaensis (Dutta, 1997) LC 40 Hoplobatrachus crassus (Jerdon, 1854) LC 41 Hoplobatrachus tigerinus (Daudin, 1802) LC 42 Limnonectes doriae (Boulenger, 1887) DD 43 Limnonectes hascheanus (Stoliczka, 1870) LC 44 Limnonectes khasianus (Anderson, 1871) DD 45 Limnonectes kuhlii (Tschudi, 1838) LC 46 Limnonectes laticeps (Boulenger, 1882) LC 47 Limnonectes macrodon (Dumeril and Bibron, 1841) VU 48 Limnonectes mawlyndipi (Chanda, 1990) DD 49 Limnonectes shompenorum Das, 1996 LC 50 Minervarya chilapata Ohler, Deuti, Grosjean, Paul, Ayyaswamy, NE 3 Zoological Survey of India Ahmed and Dutta, 2009 51 Minervarya sahyadris Dubois, Ohler and Biju, 2001 EN 52 Nanorana annandalii (Boulenger, 1920) NT 53 Nanorana arnoldi (Dubois, 1975) NT 54 Nanorana blanfordii (Boulenger, 1882) LC 55 Nanorana chayuensis (Ye, 1977) NE 56 Nanorana gammii (Anderson, 1871) NE 57 Nanorana liebigii (Gunther, 1860) LC 58 Nanorana minica (Dubois, 1975) VU 59 Nanorana mokokchungensis (Das and Chanda, 2000) DD 60 Nanorana vicina (Stoliczka, 1872) LC 61 Ombrana sikimensis (Jerdon, 1870) LC 62 Sphaerotheca breviceps (Schneider, 1799) LC 63 Sphaerotheca dobsonii (Boulenger, 1882) LC 64 Sphaerotheca leucorhynchus (Rao, 1937) DD 65 Sphaerotheca rolandae (Dubois, 1983) LC 66 Ingerana borealis (Annandale, 1912) VU 67 Ingerana charlesdarwini (Das, 1998) CE 68 Occidozyga lima (Gravenhorst, 1829) LC 69 Occidozyga sumatrana (Peters, 1877) LC 70 Zakerana brevipalmata (Peters, 1871) DD 71 Zakerana caperata (Kuramoto, Joshy, Kurabayashi and Sumida, NE 2007) 72 Zakerana granosa (Kuramoto, Joshy, Kurabayashi and Sumida, NE 2007) 73 Zakerana keralensis (Dubois, 1981) LC 74 Zakerana kudremukhensis (Kuramoto, Joshy, Kurabayashi, and NE Sumida, 2007) 75 Zakerana modestus (Rao, 1920) NE 76 Zakerana mudduraja (Kuramoto, Joshy, Kurabayashi, and NE Sumida, 2007) 4 Zoological Survey of India 77 Zakerana murthii (Pillai, 1979) CE 78 Zakerana mysorensis (Rao, 1922) DD 79 Zakerana nepalensis (Dubois, 1975) LC 80 Zakerana nilagirica (Jerdon, 1854) EN 81 Zakerana parambikulamana (Rao, 1937) DD 82 Zakerana pierrei (Dubois, 1975) LC 83 Zakerana rufescens (Jerdon, 1854) LC 84 Zakerana sauriceps (Rao, 1937) DD 85 Zakerana sengupti (Purkayastha and Matsui 2012) NE 86 Zakerana syhadrensis (Annandale, 1919) LC 87 Zakerana teraiensis (Dubois, 1984) LC FAMILY: HYLIDAE Rafinesque 88 Hyla annectans (Jerdon, 1870) LC FAMILY: MEGOPHRYIDAE, Bonaparte 89 Leptobrachium bompu Sondhi and Ohler, 2011 NE 90 Leptobrachium hasseltii Tschudi, 1838 LC 91 Leptobrachium rakhinensis Wogan, 2012 LC 92 Leptolalax khasiorum Das, Tron, Rangad and Hooroo, 2010 NE 93 Leptolalax lateralis (Anderson, 1871) NE 94 Leptolalax nokrekensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) NE 95 Leptolalax tamdil Sengupta, Sailo, Lalremsanga, Das, and Das, NE 2010 96 Scutiger nyingchiensis Fei, 1977 LC 97 Scutiger sikimmensis (Blyth, 1855) LC 98 Xenophrys boettgeri (Boulenger, 1899) LC 99 Xenophrys glandulosa (Fei, Ye and Huang, 1991) LC 100 Xenophrys major (Boulenger, 1908) LC 5 Zoological Survey of India 101 Xenophrys megacephala (Mahony, Sengupta, Kamei and Biju, NE 2011) 102 Xenophrys parva (Boulenger, 1893) LC 103 Xenophrys robusta (Boulenger, 1908) DD 104 Xenophrys serchhipii Mathew and Sen, 2007 DD 105 Xenophrys wuliangshanensis (Ye and Fei, 1995) DD 106 Xenophrys zunhebotoensis Mathew and Sen, 2007 DD FAMILY: MICRIXALIDAE Dubois, Ohler and Biju 107 Micrixalus elegans (Rao, 1937) DD 108 Micrixalus fuscus (Boulenger, 1882) NT 109 Micrixalus gadgili Pillai and Pattabiraman, 1990 EN 110 Micrixalus kottigeharensis (Rao, 1937) CE 111 Micrixalus narainensis (Rao, 1937) DD 112 Micrixalus nudis Pillai, 1978 VU 113 Micrixalus phyllophilus (Jerdon, 1853) VU 114 Micrixalus saxicola (Jerdon, 1853) VU 115 Micrixalus silvaticus (Boulenger, 1882) DD 116 Micrixalus swamianus (Rao, 1937) DD 117 Micrixalus thampii Pillai, 1981 DD FAMILY: MICROHYLIDAE Gunther 118 Kalophrynus interlineatus Blyth, 1855 LC 119 Melanobatrachus indicus Beddome, 1878 EN 120 Kaloula assamensis Das, Sengupta, Ahmed and Dutta, 2004 LC 121 Kaloula baleata (Muller, 1833) LC 122 Kaloula pulchra Gray, 1831 LC 123 Kaloula taprobanica Parker, 1934 LC 124 Microhyla berdmorei (Blyth, 1856) LC 6 Zoological Survey of India 125 Microhyla butleri Boulenger, 1900 LC 126 Microhyla chakrapanii Pillai, 1977 DD 127 Microhyla heymonsi Vogt, 1911 LC 128 Microhyla ornata (Dumeril and Bibron, 1841) LC 129 Microhyla pulchra (Hallowell, 1861) LC 130 Microhyla rubra (Jerdon, 1854) LC 131 Microhyla sholigari Dutta and Ray, 2000 EN 132 Micryletta inornata (Boulenger, 1890) LC 133 Ramanella anamalaiensis Rao, 1937 DD 134 Ramanella minor Rao, 1937 DD 135 Ramanella montana (Jerdon, 1854) NT 136 Ramanella mormorata Rao, 1937 EN 137 Ramanella triangularis (Gunther, 1875) VU 138 Ramanella variegata (Stoliczka, 1872) LC 139 Uperodon globulosus (Gunther, 1864) LC 140 Uperodon systoma (Schneider, 1799) LC FAMILY: NASIKABATRACHIDAE Biju and Bossuyt 141 Nasikabatrachus sahyadrensis Biju and Bossuyt, 2003 EN FAMILY: NYCTIBATRACHIDAE Blommers-Schlosser 142 Nyctibatrachus acanthodermis Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 143 Nyctibatrachus aliciae Inger, Shaffer, Koshy and Bakde, 1984 EN 144 Nyctibatrachus anamallaiensis (Myers, 1942) NE 145 Nyctibatrachus beddomii (Boulenger, 1882) EN 146 Nyctibatrachus danieli Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 147 Nyctibatrachus dattatreyaensis Dinesh, Radhakrishnan and CE Bhatta, 2008 7 Zoological Survey of India 148 Nyctibatrachus deccanensis Dubois, 1984 VU 149 Nyctibatrachus deveni Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 150 Nyctibatrachus gavi Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 151 Nyctibatrachus grandis Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 152 Nyctibatrachus humayuni Bhaduri and Kripalani, 1955 VU 153 Nyctibatrachus indraneili Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 154 Nyctibatrachus jog Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 155 Nyctibatrachus karnatakaensis Dinesh, Radhakrishnan, Reddy EN and Gururaja, 2007 156 Nyctibatrachus kempholeyensis (Rao, 1937) DD 157 Nyctibatrachus major Boulenger, 1882 VU 158 Nyctibatrachus minimus Biju, Bocxlaer, Giri, Roelants, Nagaraju DD and Bossuyt, 2007 159 Nyctibatrachus minor Inger, Shaffer, Koshy and Bakde, 1984 EN 160 Nyctibatrachus periyar Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh, NE Radhakrishnan, Zachariah, Giri and Bossuyt 2011 161 Nyctibatrachus petraeus Das and Kunte, 2005 LC 162 Nyctibatrachus pillaii Biju, Bocxlaer, Mahony, Dinesh,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cfreptiles & Amphibians
    WWW.IRCF.ORG TABLE OF CONTENTS IRCF REPTILES &IRCF AMPHIBIANS REPTILES • VOL &15, AMPHIBIANS NO 4 • DEC 2008 • 189 27(2):288–292 • AUG 2020 IRCF REPTILES & AMPHIBIANS CONSERVATION AND NATURAL HISTORY TABLE OF CONTENTS FEATURE ARTICLES . Chasing BullsnakesAmphibians (Pituophis catenifer sayi) in Wisconsin: of the Melghat, On the Road to Understanding the Ecology and Conservation of the Midwest’s Giant Serpent ...................... Joshua M. Kapfer 190 . The Shared History of TreeboasMaharashtra, (Corallus grenadensis) and Humans on Grenada: India A Hypothetical Excursion ............................................................................................................................Robert W. Henderson 198 RESEARCH ARTICLES Hayat A. Qureshi and Gajanan A. Wagh . Biodiversity Research Laboratory,The Texas Horned Department Lizard in of Central Zoology, and ShriWestern Shivaji Texas Science ....................... College, Emily Amravati, Henry, Jason Maharashtra–444603, Brewer, Krista Mougey, India and Gad (gaj [email protected]) 204 . The Knight Anole (Anolis equestris) in Florida .............................................Brian J. Camposano,Photographs Kenneth L. Krysko, by the Kevin authors. M. Enge, Ellen M. Donlan, and Michael Granatosky 212 CONSERVATION ALERT . World’s Mammals in Crisis ............................................................................................................................................................. 220 . More Than Mammals .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 Years Documenting the Global Diversity of Frogs, Salamanders, and Caecilians
    Zootaxa 4979 (1): 057–069 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Review ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4979.1.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:972DCE44-4345-42E8-A3BC-9B8FD7F61E88 Amphibians in Zootaxa: 20 years documenting the global diversity of frogs, salamanders, and caecilians MAURICIO RIVERA-CORREA1*+, DIEGO BALDO2*+, FLORENCIA VERA CANDIOTI3, VICTOR GOYANNES DILL ORRICO4, DAVID C. BLACKBURN5, SANTIAGO CASTROVIEJO-FISHER6, KIN ONN CHAN7, PRISCILLA GAMBALE8, DAVID J. GOWER9, EVAN S.H. QUAH10, JODI J. L. ROWLEY11, EVAN TWOMEY12 & MIGUEL VENCES13 1Grupo Herpetológico de Antioquia - GHA and Semillero de Investigación en Biodiversidad - BIO, Universidad de Antioquia, Antioquia, Colombia [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5480 2Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Instituto de Biología Subtropical (CONICET-UNaM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2382-0872 3Unidad Ejecutora Lillo, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas - Fundación Miguel Lillo, 4000 San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina [email protected]; http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-9951 4Laboratório de Herpetologia Tropical, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Rodovia Jorge Amado Km 16 45662-900 Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-4006 5Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1810-9886 6Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Av.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Bufotes Latastii (Boulenger, 1882), Endemic to the Western Himalaya
    Alytes, 2018, 36 (1–4): 314–327. Distribution of Bufotes latastii (Boulenger, 1882), endemic to the Western Himalaya 1* 1 2,3 4 Spartak N. LITVINCHUK , Dmitriy V. SKORINOV , Glib O. MAZEPA & LeO J. BORKIN 1Institute Of Cytology, Russian Academy Of Sciences, Tikhoretsky pr. 4, St. Petersburg 194064, Russia. 2Department of Ecology and EvolutiOn, University of LauSanne, BiOphOre Building, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 3 Department Of EvOlutiOnary BiOlOgy, EvOlutiOnary BiOlOgy Centre (EBC), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 4ZoOlOgical Institute, Russian Academy Of Sciences, Universitetskaya nab. 1, St. PeterSburg 199034, Russia. * CorreSpOnding author <[email protected]>. The distribution of Bufotes latastii, a diploid green toad species, is analyzed based on field observations and literature data. 74 localities are known, although 7 ones should be confirmed. The range of B. latastii is confined to northern Pakistan, Kashmir Valley and western Ladakh in India. All records of “green toads” (“Bufo viridis”) beyond this region belong to other species, both to green toads of the genus Bufotes or to toads of the genus Duttaphrynus. B. latastii is endemic to the Western Himalaya. Its allopatric range lies between those of bisexual triploid green toads in the west and in the east. B. latastii was found at altitudes from 780 to 3200 m above sea level. Environmental niche modelling was applied to predict the potential distribution range of the species. Altitude was the variable with the highest percent contribution for the explanation of the species distribution (36 %). urn:lSid:zOobank.Org:pub:0C76EE11-5D11-4FAB-9FA9-918959833BA5 INTRODUCTION Bufotes latastii (fig. 1) iS a relatively cOmmOn green toad species which spreads in KaShmir Valley, Ladakh and adjacent regiOnS Of nOrthern India and PakiStan.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article on Amphibian Found in Rajasthan
    International Journal of Academic Research and Development International Journal of Academic Research and Development ISSN: 2455-4197 Impact Factor: RJIF 5.22 www.academicsjournal.com Volume 2; Issue 6; November 2017; Page No. 702-706 Research article on amphibian found in Rajasthan 1 Tejas Joshi, 2 Govind Gupta, 3 Keshu Madhudiya 1, 3 Department of Applied Sciences, Madhav University, Rajasthan, India 2 Department of Agriculture, Madhav University, Rajasthan, India Abstract India have a great biodiversity. We can found different types of animals and their species. Amphibians are commonly found in every states of India. In this article we are going to talking about different types of amphibian found in Rajasthan. In This article we take two family of frog for external study purpose. We are going to discuss about family Rana and family Buffo and their characteristics. We take seven species for our acknowledgment. Those seven species are majorly found in Rajasthan. Keywords: biodiversity, amphibians, Rajasthan Introduction Rajasthan state is having area of 3.42 Lacks Sq. Km and it is the largest state in the Country. It is having 33 Districts under seven administrative divisions. In Rajasthan(ca. 1,32,077 sq. miles),amphibian fauna (frogs and toads) are common species, the western three-fifths of which form the great Indian Desert, has hitherto been hardly known except for McCann's (1943) short account of the fauna in the Abu Hills of Rajasthan. Lately the desert has been reported to be changing physio logocially and climatically. It has, therefore, become Fig 1 imperative to study it from all points of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species (Protection, Conser Va Tion and Regulation of Trade)
    ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSER VA TION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) THE ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULATION OF TRADE) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Preliminary Short title. Interpretation. Objects of Act. Saving of other laws. Exemptions, etc., relating to trade. Amendment of Schedules. Approved management programmes. Approval of scientific institution. Inter-scientific institution transfer. Breeding in captivity. Artificial propagation. Export of personal or household effects. PART I. Administration Designahem of Mana~mentand establishment of Scientific Authority. Policy directions. Functions of Management Authority. Functions of Scientific Authority. Scientific reports. PART II. Restriction on wade in endangered species 18. Restriction on trade in endangered species. 2 ENDANGERED SPECIES (PROTECTION, CONSERVATION AND REGULA TION OF TRADE) Regulation of trade in species spec fled in the First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedules Application to trade in endangered specimen of species specified in First, Second, Third and Fourth Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Importation of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Introduction from the sea certificate for specimens of species specified in First Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Introduction from the sea of specimens of species specified in Second Schedule. Export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Import of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Re-export of specimens of species specified in Third Schedule. Export of specimens specified in Fourth Schedule. PART 111.
    [Show full text]
  • BOA2.1 Caecilian Biology and Natural History.Key
    The Biology of Amphibians @ Agnes Scott College Mark Mandica Executive Director The Amphibian Foundation [email protected] 678 379 TOAD (8623) 2.1: Introduction to Caecilians Microcaecilia dermatophaga Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia There are more than 20 synapomorphies (shared characters) uniting the group Lissamphibia Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Integumen is Glandular Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Glandular Skin, with 2 main types of glands. Mucous Glands Aid in cutaneous respiration, reproduction, thermoregulation and defense. Granular Glands Secrete toxic and/or noxious compounds and aid in defense Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Pedicellate Teeth crown (dentine, with enamel covering) gum line suture (fibrous connective tissue, where tooth can break off) basal element (dentine) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Sacral Vertebrae Sacral Vertebrae Connects pelvic girdle to The spine. Amphibians have no more than one sacral vertebrae (caecilians have none) Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Amphicoelus Vertebrae Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Opercular apparatus Unique to amphibians and Operculum part of the sound conducting mechanism Synapomorphies of Lissamphibia Fat Bodies Surrounding Gonads Fat Bodies Insulate gonads Evolution of Amphibians † † † † Actinopterygian Coelacanth, Tetrapodomorpha †Amniota *Gerobatrachus (Ray-fin Fishes) Lungfish (stem-tetrapods) (Reptiles, Mammals)Lepospondyls † (’frogomander’) Eocaecilia GymnophionaKaraurus Caudata Triadobatrachus Anura (including Apoda Urodela Prosalirus †) Salientia Batrachia Lissamphibia
    [Show full text]
  • "Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at Its Meeting Held on ______2007, Enacted This
    In accordance with Article 6 paragraph 3 of the FT Law ("Official Gazette of RM", No. 28/04 and 37/07), the Government of the Republic of Montenegro, at its meeting held on ____________ 2007, enacted this DECISION ON CONTROL LIST FOR EXPORT, IMPORT AND TRANSIT OF GOODS Article 1 The goods that are being exported, imported and goods in transit procedure, shall be classified into the forms of export, import and transit, specifically: free export, import and transit and export, import and transit based on a license. The goods referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article were identified in the Control List for Export, Import and Transit of Goods that has been printed together with this Decision and constitutes an integral part hereof (Exhibit 1). Article 2 In the Control List, the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license, were designated by the abbreviation: “D”, and automatic license were designated by abbreviation “AD”. The goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license designated by the abbreviation “D” and specific number, license is issued by following state authorities: - D1: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for protection of human health - D2: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for animal and plant health protection, if goods are imported, exported or in transit for veterinary or phyto-sanitary purposes - D3: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for environment protection - D4: the goods for which export, import and transit is based on a license issued by the state authority competent for culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Duttaphrynus Melanostictus (Schneider 1799) Junto Con Un Cargamento De Bonsáis, Procedentes De China
    CATÁLOGO ESPAÑOL DE ESPECIES EXÓTICAS INVASORAS Duttaphrynus melanostictus DUTMEL/EEI/AN004 (Schneider 1799) Castellano: sapo común asiático Nombre vulgar Catalán. --: Euskera: -- Grupo taxonómico: Fauna Posición taxonómica Phylum: Chordata Clase: Amphibia Orden: Anura Familia: Bufonidae Observaciones Hasta el año 2006 su nombre científico era Bufo melanostictus, taxonómicas pero en la revisión de la taxonomía de los anfibios realizada por Frost y colaboradores, fue situado en el nuevo género Duttaphrynus (Frost et al., 2006). En una gran parte de las referencias bibliográficas figura como Bufo melanostictus. Sinónimos: Bufo chlorogaster, Daudin, 1802; Rana dubia Shaw, 1802 Bufo scaber Daudin, 1802, Bufo bengalensis Daudin, 1802, Bufo carinatus Gray, 1830, Bufo dubia Gray, 1830, Bufo isos Lesson, 1834, Bufo gymnauchen, Bleeker, 1858, Docidophryne isos Fitzinger, 1861, Phrynoidis melanostictus Cope, 1862, Bufo spinipes Steindachner, 1867, Bufo longecristatus Werner, 1903, Bufo tienhoensis Bourret, 1937, Docidophryne melanostictus Bourret, 1942, Bufo camortensis Mansukhani & Sarkar, 1980, Ansonia kamblei Ravichandran & Pillai, 1990.Bufo tienhoensis. Resumen de su situación e El sapo común asiático (Duttaphrynus melanostictus) es una impacto en España especie muy adaptable y oportunista, que ocupa una amplísima región del sur de Asia. En décadas recientes ha invadido diversas zonas del sudeste asiático y de Australasia, estableciéndose en ellas con éxito, lo que confirma su carácter invasor, acorde con su oportunismo y adaptabilidad. Aunque se trata de una especie en principio propia de climas tropicales y subtropicales, su capacidad de adaptación hace temer que también pueda comportarse como una especie invasora en las zonas mediterráneas españolas. Normativa nacional Norma: Real Decreto 630/2013, de 2 de agosto. Catálogo Español de Especies Exóticas Invasoras Normativa autonómica - No existe normativa autonómica que incluya esta especie como especie exótica invasora.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Ghats & Sri Lanka Biodiversity Hotspot
    Ecosystem Profile WESTERN GHATS & SRI LANKA BIODIVERSITY HOTSPOT WESTERN GHATS REGION FINAL VERSION MAY 2007 Prepared by: Kamal S. Bawa, Arundhati Das and Jagdish Krishnaswamy (Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology & the Environment - ATREE) K. Ullas Karanth, N. Samba Kumar and Madhu Rao (Wildlife Conservation Society) in collaboration with: Praveen Bhargav, Wildlife First K.N. Ganeshaiah, University of Agricultural Sciences Srinivas V., Foundation for Ecological Research, Advocacy and Learning incorporating contributions from: Narayani Barve, ATREE Sham Davande, ATREE Balanchandra Hegde, Sahyadri Wildlife and Forest Conservation Trust N.M. Ishwar, Wildlife Institute of India Zafar-ul Islam, Indian Bird Conservation Network Niren Jain, Kudremukh Wildlife Foundation Jayant Kulkarni, Envirosearch S. Lele, Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Environment & Development M.D. Madhusudan, Nature Conservation Foundation Nandita Mahadev, University of Agricultural Sciences Kiran M.C., ATREE Prachi Mehta, Envirosearch Divya Mudappa, Nature Conservation Foundation Seema Purshothaman, ATREE Roopali Raghavan, ATREE T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation Sharmishta Sarkar, ATREE Mohammed Irfan Ullah, ATREE and with the technical support of: Conservation International-Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Assisted by the following experts and contributors: Rauf Ali Gladwin Joseph Uma Shaanker Rene Borges R. Kannan B. Siddharthan Jake Brunner Ajith Kumar C.S. Silori ii Milind Bunyan M.S.R. Murthy Mewa Singh Ravi Chellam Venkat Narayana H. Sudarshan B.A. Daniel T.S. Nayar R. Sukumar Ranjit Daniels Rohan Pethiyagoda R. Vasudeva Soubadra Devy Narendra Prasad K. Vasudevan P. Dharma Rajan M.K. Prasad Muthu Velautham P.S. Easa Asad Rahmani Arun Venkatraman Madhav Gadgil S.N. Rai Siddharth Yadav T. Ganesh Pratim Roy Santosh George P.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Froglog95 New Version Draft1.Indd
    March 2011 Vol. 95 FrogLogwww.amphibians.org News from the herpetological community The new face of the ASG “Lost” Frogs Red List The global search Updating South comes to an end. Africas Red Where next? Lists. Page 1 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 1 2 | FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 CONTENTS The Sierra Caral of Guatemala a refuge for endemic amphibians page 5 The Search for “Lost” Frogs page 12 Recent diversifi cation in old habitats: Molecules and morphology in the endangered frog, Craugastor uno page 17 Updating the IUCN Red List status of South African amphibians 6 Amphibians on the IUCN Red List: Developments and changes since the Global Amphibian Assessment 7 The forced closure of conservation work on Seychelles Sooglossidae 8 Alien amphibians challenge Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis 9 Is there a decline of amphibian richness in Bellanwila-Attidiya Sanctuary? 10 High prevalence of the amphibian chytrid pathogen in Gabon 11 Breeding-site selection by red-belly toads, Melanophryniscus stelzneri (Anura: Bufonidae), in Sierras of Córdoba, Argentina 11 Upcoming meetings 20 | Recent Publications 20 | Internships & Jobs 23 Funding Opportunities 22 | Author Instructions 24 | Current Authors 25 FrogLog Vol. 95 | March 2011 | 3 FrogLog Editorial elcome to the new-look FrogLog. It has been a busy few months Wfor the ASG! We have redesigned the look and feel of FrogLog ASG & EDITORIAL COMMITTEE along with our other media tools to better serve the needs of the ASG community. We hope that FrogLog will become a regular addition to James P. Collins your reading and a platform for sharing research, conservation stories, events, and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Evolution and Modularity of the Caecilian Skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J
    Bardua et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2019) 19:30 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1342-7 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull Carla Bardua1,2* , Mark Wilkinson1, David J. Gower1, Emma Sherratt3 and Anjali Goswami1,2 Abstract Background: Caecilians (Gymnophiona) are the least speciose extant lissamphibian order, yet living forms capture approximately 250 million years of evolution since their earliest divergences. This long history is reflected in the broad range of skull morphologies exhibited by this largely fossorial, but developmentally diverse, clade. However, this diversity of form makes quantification of caecilian cranial morphology challenging, with highly variable presence or absence of many structures. Consequently, few studies have examined morphological evolution across caecilians. This extensive variation also raises the question of degree of conservation of cranial modules (semi-autonomous subsets of highly-integrated traits) within this clade, allowing us to assess the importance of modular organisation in shaping morphological evolution. We used an intensive surface geometric morphometric approach to quantify cranial morphological variation across all 32 extant caecilian genera. We defined 16 cranial regions using 53 landmarks and 687 curve and 729 surface sliding semilandmarks. With these unprecedented high-dimensional data, we analysed cranial shape and modularity across caecilians assessing phylogenetic, allometric and ecological influences on cranial evolution, as well as investigating the relationships among integration, evolutionary rate, and morphological disparity. Results: We found highest support for a ten-module model, with greater integration of the posterior skull. Phylogenetic signal was significant (Kmult =0.87,p < 0.01), but stronger in anterior modules, while allometric influences were also significant (R2 =0.16,p < 0.01), but stronger posteriorly.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from the Techniques, and Recent Predictions Western Ghats of Goa and Karnataka (Dinesh Et Al
    JoTT NOTE 2(8): 1105-1108 New site records of Gegeneophis upsurge in the description of new goaensis and G. mhadeiensis species in Gegeneophis may be due to optimization of surveying (Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae) from the techniques, and recent predictions Western Ghats of Goa and Karnataka (Dinesh et al. 2009) indicate future discovery of new species from this genus. 1 2 Gopalakrishna Bhatta , K.P. Dinesh , Gegeneophis goaensis was described by Bhatta et 3 4 P. Prashanth , Nirmal U. Kulkarni & al. (2007a) from Keri Village, Sattari Taluk, North Goa 5 C. Radhakrishnan District, Goa based on a set of three specimens collected in September 2006 and July 2008. G. mhadeiensis 1 Department of Biology, BASE Educational Service Pvt. Ltd., was described in 2007 from Chorla Village, Khanapur Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560004, India 2,5 Zoological Survey of India, Western Ghat Regional Centre, Taluk, Belgaum District, Karnataka from a set of three Eranhipalam, Kozhikode, Kerala 673006, India specimens collected during 2006 (Bhatta et al. 2007b). 3 Agumbe Rainforest Research Station, Agumbe, Karnataka During our recent explorations for these secretive animals 577411, India 4 in the bordering districts of Maharashtra (Sindhudurg), Hiru Naik Building, Dhuler Mapusa, Goa 403507, India Email: 2 [email protected] (corresponding author) Goa (North Goa) and Karnataka (Belgaum), we collected an individual of G. goaensis (Image 1) below the soil heap surrounding a banana plantation in Chorla In India the order Gymnophiona Müller is represented Village (Karnataka) on 05 August 2009 (Table 1). All by 26 species under four genera in two families (Dinesh the morphological and morphometric details were in et al.
    [Show full text]