DOCSLIB.ORG

Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. Jessica Cresseveur University of Louisville

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. Jessica Cresseveur University of Louisville University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2016 The queer child and haut bourgeois domesticity : Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt. Jessica Cresseveur University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the American Art and Architecture Commons, Modern Art and Architecture Commons, and the Theory and Criticism Commons Recommended Citation Cresseveur, Jessica, "The queer child and haut bourgeois domesticity : Berthe Morisot and Mary Cassatt." (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2409. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2409 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE QUEER CHILD AND HAUT BOURGEOIS DOMESTICITY: BERTHE MORISOT AND MARY CASSATT By Jessica Cresseveur B.A., University of Louisville, 2000 M.A., University College London, 2003 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Humanities Department of Comparative Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, KY May 2016 Copyright 2016 by Jessica Cresseveur All rights reserved THE QUEER CHILD AND HAUT BOURGEOIS DOMESTICITY: BERTHE MORISOT AND MARY CASSATT By Jessica Cresseveur B.A., University of Louisville, 2000 M.A., University College London, 2003 A Dissertation Approved on April 15, 2016 by the following Dissertation Committee: ______________________________________________ Dissertation Director: Jongwoo Kim, PhD ______________________________________________ Benjamin Hufbauer, PhD ______________________________________________ John Greene, PhD ______________________________________________ Michelle Facos, PhD ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my father John Joseph Cresseveur who would have been proud to see me achieve this milestone. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This dissertation would not have been possible without the guidance of my committee. My chair and faculty adviser Prof. Jongwoo Kim offered constructive criticism, which has made me a better writer, scholar, and educator. Prof. Kim, along with Prof. Benjamin Hufbauer, and Prof. John Greene, are to be thanked for their recommendations of sources to consult to make this dissertation a truly interdisciplinary endeavor. I also owe a debt of gratitude to Prof. Michelle Facos, my outside reader, whose research I have found enlightening. I am honored to have these four brilliant scholars on my committee. No major research project can be conducted or completed without the services provided by libraries and museums. The staff members of Ekstrom and the Margaret Bridwell Art Library at the University of Louisville deserve my gratitude for their accommodating spirit. I also must thank Missy Zellner, the Archives Assistant at the Railroad Museum of Pennsylvania. When Internet and database searches proved fruitless, Ms. Zellner was able to provide background information on John Singer Sargent’s full- length portrait of Alexander Cassatt, which is housed in the museum. During my time as a Ph.D. student and as a Graduate Teaching Assistant, discussions with my colleagues have proven immensely helpful to help me maintain a iv sense of calmness and also to trigger a few “Eureka” moments. As completion of the program takes us in different directions, I hope that we can remain in contact with one another. They are not only my colleagues and my peers but also my friends. Last, but certainly not least, I must thank my two dearest friends Sarah Quelland and Amanda Gomez. For over three decades, they have been my collective rock, my inspiration, my sisters. No matter how busy I became with writing and research, which sometimes resulted in weeks of no communication, they never took it personally. Instead, they offered words of understanding and encouragement, as they have since our childhood. It is often said that having one true friend makes a person fortunate. In that case, I am doubly fortunate—and eternally grateful—to have these amazing women in my life. v ABSTRACT THE QUEER CHILD AND HAUT BOURGEOIS DOMESTICITY: BERTHE MORISOT AND MARY CASSATT Jessica M. Cresseveur April 15, 2016 Since the 1970s, feminist art historians have extensively treated Mary Cassatt and Berthe Morisot. In particular, focusing on class-bound womanhood and domesticity, Griselda Pollock, Linda Nochlin, and Anne Higonnet have provided compelling psychoanalytic, Marxist, and semiotic analyses, seemingly exhausting all potentials for any further historical exploration of these artists. Yet, to date, investigations into the significance of the queer (deviations from normative sociocultural codes of gender identity, sexuality, and reproduction) in the works of Cassatt and Morisot have not been conducted. In this dissertation, queer theory complements the existing scholarship that has focused on the significance of women as mothers in the oeuvres of both artists. Late nineteenth-century norms concerning masculinity, childhood innocence, and normalization were determined by rigid classificatory boundaries that ensured the existence of binary oppositions (masculine/feminine, child/adult/, human/animal, etc.) and rendered any evidence of nuance as suspect. Using primarily queer and psychoanalytic theories, this dissertation reveals the paradoxes in late nineteenth-century vi French and American culture that govern normativity and the strangeness with which established norms imbue behavior that comes “naturally” to the portrayed men and children. This dissertation is divided into four chapters covering queer patriarchy, childhood innocence, and normalization. Each chapter discusses the problematic nature of established dichotomies to uncover the constructedness of normativity and queerness. Chapter One examines how Cassatt and Morisot depicted the dynamics of fathers and family life amid a “crisis” of masculinity triggered by the aftermath of war, increasingly sedentary lifestyles, and the physical and psychological ramifications of the competitive corporate atmosphere. Chapter Two reveals childhood innocence as a contradiction to heteronormative expectations and explores the significance of animals and childhood sexuality in the dynamics of both constructs. Chapter Three looks at the normalization of children in terms of pedagogy, resistance to normalization, and suppression of the inner animal. Chapter Four illuminates the hidden queerness in depictions of normative play and the significance of “gender-inappropriate” playtime activities. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION…………………………………………………………………………...iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………iv ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………...………vi LIST OF FIGURES……………………...……………………………………….....…….x INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………...1 Defining “Queer” and Legitimating Its Place in Impressionism………………….2 Review of Existing Art Historical Scholarship…………………………………...6 Chapter Summaries……………………………………………………………...13 CHAPTER 1: QUEER PATRIARCHY………………………………………..………..24 Normative Masculinity…………………………………………………………..26 The Attentive Domestic Patriarch of the Third Republic………………………..35 Pictures of Normativity…………………………………………………………..43 Character and the Semi-Retired Executive………………………………………51 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….60 Figures for Chapter One………………………………………………………….64 CHAPTER 2: INNOCENCE, FUTURITY, AND THE ANIMAL……...……………...79 A Brief History of Childhood Innocence and the Problems It Presents………...80 Cassatt’s Young Niece: A Subtle Critique………………………………………86 viii Reynolds Revisited: Enter Ephemerality………………………………………..92 The Child as Animal………………………………...………………………….101 Not so Innocent: The Child and the Animal……………………………………110 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...118 Figures for Chapter Two………………………………………………………..121 CHAPTER 3: NORMALIZATION AND ITS DISRUPTIONS, PART I…………..…130 Cassatt’s Exposure of Gender Normalization…………………………………..132 Resistance and the Animal…………………………………………………...…146 Queering the Book……………………………………………………...………161 Where the Book Meets the Animal…………………………………………….168 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...172 Figures for Chapter Three………………………………………………………174 CHAPTER 4: NORMALIZATION AND ITS DISRUPTIONS, PART II…………….181 Portrait of the Artist’s Daughter as the “Bad Mother”…………………………184 Boys and Their Toys…………………………………………………………...197 Sailing against the Norm……………………………………………………….204 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………...213 Figures for Chapter Four…………….………………………………………….215 REFERENCES....………………………………………………………………………225 CURRICULUM VITA…………………………………………………………………252 ix LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE PAGE Chapter One 1. Berthe Morisot. Eugène Manet and His Daughter at Bougival………………….….64 2. Berthe Morisot. Eugène Manet and His Daughter at Bougival (Detail)……..….…..65 3. Mary Cassatt. Emmie and Her Child……………………………………….…….….66 4. Berthe Morisot. Eugène Manet and His Daughter at Bougival (Detail)………….…67 5. Berthe Morisot. Eugène Manet and His Daughter at Bougival (Detail)………….…67 6. Photograph of Berthe Morisot, Eugène Manet, and Julie Manet at Bougival.............68 7. Studio of Nadar. Vicomte
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Maner and His Followers / T
    THE PAINTING of Copyright © 1984 by T. f. Clark All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published by Princeton University.Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. Reprinted by arrangement with Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. MODERN LIFE Grateful acknowledgment is made to the following for permission to reprint previously pub- lished material: Excerpt from "Marie Lloyd" in Selected Essays by T. S. Eliot, copyright 1950 by Harcourt Brace [ovanovich, Inc.; renewed ]978 by Esme Valerie Eliot. Reprinted by permission PARISIN THE ART OF MANET AND HIS FOLLOWERS of the publisher. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING IN PUnUCATION DATA Revised Edition Clark, T. J. (Timothy J.) The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Maner and his followers / T. 1- Clark. - Rev. ed. P: em. Includes bibliographica! references and index. T.1.CLARK ISBN 0-69!-00903-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Impressionism (Art)-France-Paris. 2. Painting, French- France-Paris. 3. Painting, Modern-19th century+=France-c-Paris. 4. Paris (Francej-c-In art. 5. Maner, Edouard, l832-1883--Inftuencc, I. Title. ND550.C55 1999 758'.9944361-dc21 99-29643 FIRST PRINTING OF THE REVISED EDITION, 1999 MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FIRST PRINCETON PAPERBACK PRINTING, 1986 THIRD PRINCETON PAPERBACK PRINTING, 1989 9 8 7 CHAPTER TWO OLYMPIA'S CHOICE "We shall define as prostitute only that woman who, publicly and without love, gives herself to the first comer for a pecuniary remuneration; to which formula we shall add: and has no other means of existence besides the temporary relations she entertains with a more or less large number of individuals." From which itfollows--and it seems to me the truth--that prostitute implies first venality and second absence of choice.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral History Interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14
    Oral history interview with Frederick A. Sweet, 1976 February 13-14 Funding for the digital preservation of this interview was provided by a grant from the Save America's Treasures Program of the National Park Service. Contact Information Reference Department Archives of American Art Smithsonian Institution Washington. D.C. 20560 www.aaa.si.edu/askus Transcript Preface The following oral history transcript is the result of a tape-recorded interview with Frederick Sweet on February 13 & 14, 1976. The interview took place in Sargentville, Maine, and was conducted by Robert Brown for the Archives of American Art, Smithsonian Institution. Interview February 13, 1976. ROBERT BROWN: Could you begin, perhaps, by just sketching out a bit of your childhood, and we can pick up from there. FREDERICK SWEET: I spent most of my early childhood in this house. My father, a doctor and tenth generation Rhode Islander, went out to Bisbee, Arizona, a wild-west copper-mining town, as the chief surgeon under the aegis of the Company. My mother always came East at pregnancy and was in New York visiting relatives when my father died very suddenly of cerebral hemorrhage. My mother was seven months pregnant with me. Since I was to be a summer baby, she ended up by coming to this house and being a cook and being a cook and a nurse with her there. The local doctor came and said nothing was going to happen for quite a long time and went off in his horse and buggy. I was promptly delivered by the cook and a nurse.
    [Show full text]
  • 16 Exhibition on Screen
    Exhibition on Screen - The Impressionists – And the Man Who Made Them 2015, Run Time 97 minutes An eagerly anticipated exhibition travelling from the Musee d'Orsay Paris to the National Gallery London and on to the Philadelphia Museum of Art is the focus of the most comprehensive film ever made about the Impressionists. The exhibition brings together Impressionist art accumulated by Paul Durand-Ruel, the 19th century Parisian art collector. Degas, Manet, Monet, Pissarro, Renoir, and Sisley, are among the artists that he helped to establish through his galleries in London, New York and Paris. The exhibition, bringing together Durand-Ruel's treasures, is the focus of the film, which also interweaves the story of Impressionism and a look at highlights from Impressionist collections in several prominent American galleries. Paintings: Rosa Bonheur: Ploughing in Nevers, 1849 Constant Troyon: Oxen Ploughing, Morning Effect, 1855 Théodore Rousseau: An Avenue in the Forest of L’Isle-Adam, 1849 (Barbizon School) Jean-François Millet: The Gleaners, 1857 (Barbizon School) Jean-François Millet: The Angelus, c. 1857-1859 (Barbizon School) Charles-François Daubigny: The Grape Harvest in Burgundy, 1863 (Barbizon School) Jean-François Millet: Spring, 1868-1873 (Barbizon School) Jean-Baptiste Camille Corot: Ruins of the Château of Pierrefonds, c. 1830-1835 Théodore Rousseau: View of Mont Blanc, Seen from La Faucille, c. 1863-1867 Eugène Delecroix: Interior of a Dominican Convent in Madrid, 1831 Édouard Manet: Olympia, 1863 Pierre Auguste Renoir: The Swing, 1876 16 Alfred Sisley: Gateway to Argenteuil, 1872 Édouard Manet: Luncheon on the Grass, 1863 Edgar Degas: Ballet Rehearsal on Stage, 1874 Pierre Auguste Renoir: Ball at the Moulin de la Galette, 1876 Pierre Auguste Renoir: Portrait of Mademoiselle Legrand, 1875 Alexandre Cabanel: The Birth of Venus, 1863 Édouard Manet: The Fife Player, 1866 Édouard Manet: The Tragic Actor (Rouvière as Hamlet), 1866 Henri Fantin-Latour: A Studio in the Batingnolles, 1870 Claude Monet: The Thames below Westminster, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 3: the Impressionist Revolution
    Class 3: The Impressionist Revolution A. Who were they? 1. Title Slide 1 (Renoir: The Skiff) 2. Revolution/Legacy Last week was most about poetry. Today, will be almost all about painting. I had originally announced it as “The Impressionist Legacy,” with the idea that I was take the actual painters—Monet, Renoir, and the like—for granted and spend the whole class on their legacy. But the more I worked, the more I saw that the changes that made modernism possible all occurred in the work of the Impressionists themselves. So I have changed the title to “The Impressionist Revolution,” and have tweaked the syllabus to add a class next week that will give the legacy the time it needs. 3. Monet: Impression, Sunrise (1872, Paris, Musée Marmottan) So who were the Impressionists? The name is the easy part. At the first group exhibition in 1874, Claude Monet (1840–1926) showed a painting of the port in his home town of Rouen, and called it Impression, Sunrise. A hostile critic seized on the title as an instrument of ridicule. But his quip backfired; within two years, the artists were using the name Impressionistes to advertise their shows. 4. Chart 1: artists before the first Exhibition 5. Chart 2: exhibition participation There were eight group exhibitions in all: in 1874, 1876, 1877, 1879, 1880, 1881, 1882, and 1886. So one answer to the question “Who were the Impressionists?” would be “Anyone who participated in one or more of their shows.” Here are seven who did, with a thumbnail of their earlier work, plus two who didn’t.
    [Show full text]
  • Degas: Agency in Images of Women
    Degas: Agency in Images of Women BY EMMA WOLIN Edgar Degas devoted much of his life’s work to the depiction of women. Among his most famous works are his ballet dancers, bathers and milliners; more than three- quarters of Degas’ total works featured images of women.1 Recently, the work of Degas has provoked feminist readings of the artist’s treatment of his subject matter. Degas began by sketching female relatives and eventually moved on to sketch live nude models; he was said to have been relentless in his pursuit of the female image. Some scholars have read this tendency as obsessive or pathological, while others trace Degas’ fixation to his own familial relationships; Degas’ own mother died when he was a teenager.2 Degas painted women in more diverse roles than most of his contemporaries. But was Degas a full-fledged misogynist? That may depend on one’s interpretation of his oeuvre. Why did he paint so many women? In any case, whatever the motivation and intent behind Degas’ images, there is much to be said for his portrayal of women. This paper will attempt to investigate Degas’ treatment of women through criticism, critical analysis, visual evidence and the author’s unique insight. Although the work of Degas is frequently cited as being misogynistic, some of his work gives women more freedom than they would have otherwise enjoyed, while other paintings, namely his nude sketches, placed women under the direct scrutiny of the male gaze. Despite the ubiquity 1 Richard Kendall, Degas, Images of Women, (London: Tate Gallery Publications, 1989), 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalizing Art. Evidence on the Impressionists at the End of the Paris Salon
    European Journal of Political Economy 62 (2020) 101857 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect European Journal of Political Economy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejpe Liberalizing art. Evidence on the Impressionists at the end of the Paris Salon Federico Etro *, Silvia Marchesi, Elena Stepanova University of Florence, University of Milan Bicocca and St. Anna School of Advanced Studies-Pisa, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT JEL classification: We analyze the art market in Paris between the government-controlled Salon and the post-1880 C23 system, when the Republican government liberalized art exhibitions. The jury of the old Salon Z11 decided on submissions with a bias in favor of conservative art of the academic insiders, erecting Keywords: entry barriers against outsiders as the Impressionists. With a difference-in difference estimation, Art market we provide evidence that the end of the government-controlled Salon contributed to start the price Liberalization increase of the Impressionists relative to the insiders. Market structure Insider-outsider Hedonic regressions Impressionism 1. Introduction For more than two centuries the Paris Salon organized the art exhibition where French artists selected by an official jury could display their works. Such a system controlled by the on-going regime ended with the liberalization of 1880, which started the creation of a variety of privately organized salons. The artistic innovations of Impressionist painters, such as Claude Monet, Pierre Auguste Renoir, Camille Pissarro, Alfred Sisley, Edgar Degas, Paul Cezanne as well as Edouard Manet, had been marginalized in the government- controlled Salon and in the Paris art market, which were dominated by more traditional Academic artists.
    [Show full text]
  • James G. Lydon Duquesne University Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    168 BOOK REVIEWS APRIL and was a major trader in opium smuggled in from the Near East and India. Though some historians have suggested that drug smuggling re- flected racist attitudes, the author concludes rather that it fitted the moral standards of the day. Defense of opium smuggling was defense of free-trade principles. Despite the corruption of government officials which itoccasioned, the Chinese did not have the same antipathy for American traders as they directed toward the British who fought two wars to continue the trade. What Britain attained by war, America gained by diplomacy, without creating hatreds. While they treated Chinese law casually, Americans greatly respected Chinese merchants for their honesty and high ethical standards. Though the outlines of American contacts withAsia have been thoroughly sketched by others, Goldstein makes an important contribution inrelating the social issues connected with the trade to questions of cultural exchange and racist relationships. Some minor carping: the author might have concentrated a bit more attention on the importance of Chinese styles to eighteenth- century Europeans, the era of "Chinoiserie." That Asian culture was in the mode undoubtedly encouraged American interest in the China trade. The archaic spelling used for St. Eustatius (St. Eustacia) was bothersome. Is it George Chinery (illustration opposite p. 36) or George Chinnery (p. 38) ? References to American war vessels as USF Congress and USF Vincennes are confusing. Does the "F" sig- nify frigate ? Ifso, it is a new usage since frigates were ship-rigged ; thus USS serves. Allin all,however, this small study is very well done ;it is well written, very well researched, very nicely and profusely illustrated, very neatly packaged and published.
    [Show full text]
  • Art of Judging
    NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW VOLUME 71 JUNE 1996 NUMBER 3 THE ART OF JUDGING STEWART G. POLLOCK* In the second annual William J. Brennan, Jr. Lectur4 New Jersey Supreme Court Justice Stewart G. Pollock explores the relationship between art and adjudication. The separationof powers, the federalist system, and the inherent constraints of the common law confine state courts. Notwithstanding those constraints,state courts have demonstrated creativity when interpretingstate statutes and constitutionsand when adapting the common law to changing conditions. Thus, Justice Pollock fnds artistry in the work of state courts. He begins by exploring creativity in statu- tory interpretation. Then, Justice Pollock examines two areasof substantive law of greatpublic concern: public-school-financelitigation under state constitutions and the common-law redefinition of the modem family. Justice Pollock demonstrates how state appellate courts, through public-school-finance litigation, have shaped the constitutionalright to a public-school education. Justice Pollock then discusses how state courts have reacted to the changing composition of the American family. By recognizing these changes, state courts have redefined the family in areas as diverse as zoning ordinances, surrogacy agreements, and same-sex marriages. Common to all these endeavors is protection of the inherent dignity of the individ- ual Justice Pollock concludes that an appreciationof the similarities between art and judging may lead to a better understandingof the judicial process. Delivering the Brennan Lecture in Vanderbilt Hall is for me deeply moving. Justice Brennan graced the New Jersey Supreme Court for four years before starting his remarkable service on the United States Supreme Court. Also, this building is named for the former dean of this law school and the Chief Justice of the New Jersey Supreme Court with whom Justice Brennan served, Arthur T.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Monet : Seasons and Moments by William C
    Claude Monet : seasons and moments By William C. Seitz Author Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.) Date 1960 Publisher The Museum of Modern Art in collaboration with the Los Angeles County Museum: Distributed by Doubleday & Co. Exhibition URL www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/2842 The Museum of Modern Art's exhibition history— from our founding in 1929 to the present—is available online. It includes exhibition catalogues, primary documents, installation views, and an index of participating artists. MoMA © 2017 The Museum of Modern Art The Museum of Modern Art, New York Seasons and Moments 64 pages, 50 illustrations (9 in color) $ 3.50 ''Mliili ^ 1* " CLAUDE MONET: Seasons and Moments LIBRARY by William C. Seitz Museumof MotfwnArt ARCHIVE Claude Monet was the purest and most characteristic master of Impressionism. The fundamental principle of his art was a new, wholly perceptual observation of the most fleeting aspects of nature — of moving clouds and water, sun and shadow, rain and snow, mist and fog, dawn and sunset. Over a period of almost seventy years, from the late 1850s to his death in 1926, Monet must have pro duced close to 3,000 paintings, the vast majority of which were landscapes, seascapes, and river scenes. As his involvement with nature became more com plete, he turned from general representations of season and light to paint more specific, momentary, and transitory effects of weather and atmosphere. Late in the seventies he began to repeat his subjects at different seasons of the year or moments of the day, and in the nineties this became a regular procedure that resulted in his well-known "series " — Haystacks, Poplars, Cathedrals, Views of the Thames, Water ERRATA Lilies, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • SEBASTIAN SMEE Abcde Introduction in ‘The Warrior,’ Dash and Virtuosity
    Frame by Frame TReasURes TUCKED AWAY IN NEW ENGLAND MUSEUM COLLECTIONS SEBASTIAN SMEE abcde Introduction In ‘The Warrior,’ dash and virtuosity It seemed like a good idea at the time. It seems – and this is most unusual in my case – like an even better one now. As art critic at The Boston Globe, my brief is to review exhibitions in New England’s art mu- seums. Since I arrived at the Globe from Sydney, Australia, in 2008, I’ve been traveling to these shows as they open (or at least, in busy periods, before they shut!). But a good museum is about more than just its temporary exhibits. And so, whether I am go- ing to a show in Boston or farther afield, I always try to leave time to visit the permanent collec- tions of these museums, some of which are college museums (and what an abundance of excep- tional college art collections New England has!) while others are public museums with storied histories, such as the Peabody Essex Museum, the Boston Athenaeum, the Institute of Contempo- rary Art, or the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum. After all, it’s the permanent collections that are, in almost every case, the great pride of these places, and of the communities they serve. From the very beginning, what I saw, as I traveled from Connecticut and Rhode Island to Maine and New Hampshire, blew me away. Four years later, I continue to marvel. The sheer range of art on display – from trumpeting masterpieces to small and whimsical improvisations – is stunning. And they’re all just waiting there, five, six, or seven days a week, in beautiful, spacious buildings that make it their business warmly to welcome the general public.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Cassatt
    National Gallery of Art Summer 2008 ngakids inside scoop Washington Pull-out who?what?how? [images for this section: Leonardos’ Ginevra de’Benci; Leonardo’s self-portrait] [design: place quote somewhere inside] A face is not well done unless it expresses a state of mind. Leon- “I have had a joy from which no one can rob me — I have been able to touch some people with my art.” Mary Cassatt Mary Cassatt, The Boating Party (detail), 1893 / 1894, National Gallery of Art, Chester Dale Collection who? what? how? Impressionist Connection 2 Early in her career, Cassatt explored different styles exhibit with the Impressionists in 1879. The Impres- of painting. Soon, however, she began to observe and sionists depicted fleeting moments in both nature and paint the scenes around her in Paris, exploring the ordinary human activity and experimented with bright subject of modern life. But Cassatt was not a bohemian colors, loose brush strokes, and innovative angled artist. She was comfortable in her own social milieu, viewpoints. These techniques reflected a dynamic new and it is this world — populated by family, friends, and approach to painting. their children — that she depicted. Ladies seated in Among these artists, Cassatt was the only American — the theater, women reading or taking tea in homes or and one of only three women. Her artistic talent, gardens, mothers washing and swaddling babies, and understanding of French language and culture, and children playing were the subjects that were part of her independent thinking earned her the respect of everyday world. this selective group, whose membership included Her ability to capture a moment in time caught the Claude Monet, Auguste Renoir, Camille Pissarro, and attention of Edgar Degas, who invited Cassatt to Alfred Sisley.
    [Show full text]
  • Artist Spotlight
    ARTIST SPOTLIGHT Édouard Manet DAN SCOTT The Bridge BetweenÉdouard Realism Manet and Impressionism Édouard Manet (1832-1883) was a French painter who bridged the gap between Real- ism and Impressionism. In this ebook, I take a closer look at his life and art. Édouard Manet, Boating, 1874 2 Key Fact Here are some of the key facts and ideas about the life and art of Manet: • Unlike many of his contemporaries, he was fortunate enough to be born into a wealthy family in Paris on 23 January 1832. His father was a high-ranking judge and his mother had strong political connections, being the daughter of a diplomat and goddaughter of Charles Bernadotte, a Swedish crown prince. • His father expected him to follow in his footsteps down a career in law. However, with encouragement from his uncle, he was more interested in a career as a paint- er. His uncle would take him to the Louvre on numerous occasions to be inspired by the master paintings. • Before committing himself to the arts, he tried to join the Navy but failed his entry examination twice. Only then did his father give his reluctant acceptance for him to become an artist. • He trained under a skilled teacher and painter named Thomas Couture from 1850 to 1856. Below is one of Couture’s paintings, which is similar to the early work of Manet. I always find it interesting to see how much a teacher’s work can influence the work of their students. That is why you need to be selective with who you learn from.
    [Show full text]