Generation Gap}

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Generation Gap} EXECUTIVE FOCUS {GENERATION GAP} By Andy Reese CROSS THE GENERATION GAP Challenged to ore than 30 years integrate and engage ago, when Carl Selinger was a junior with Millennials, engineer at the engineering beginning of his 31-year career at The MPort Authority of New York and New organizations are Jersey, he accompanied a delegation of finding new transportation officials from Southeast Asia to dinner. Unsure of how to ways to bridge behave during the meal, he asked his generational divides senior colleague who was managing the delegation what he should do. “He told me, ‘Watch them, and do what they do.’ And it worked!” says Selinger. cohort in the workforce, surpassing Selinger, the author of best- Baby Boomers and Gen Xers, selling book Stuff You Don’t Learn in according to the Pew Research Engineering School (Wiley-IEEE Press, Center. With an average of 10,000 2004), harkens back to those early Baby Boomers currently turning 65 days of his career as he every day, Millennials will reflects on how today’s account for greater than 50 engineering leaders need percent of the workforce to think about engaging by 2020, Pew notes. with the Millennial- Those numbers add up generation professionals to significant challenges increasingly filling and competitive risks for the ranks of their engineering organizations. organizations. “It goes Consider: Between back to the individual the Baby Boomers and and helping that person Millennials, the smaller develop soft skills—or Generation X graduated what someone who fewer engineers than reviewed my book Author Carl Selinger their parents’ cohort. As called ‘life skills.’” Photo Credit: John Livsey a result, organizations that struggled to hire BIG GENERATION, BIG Gen X engineers—and that therefore CHALLENGES FOR ENGINEERING continue to rely on greying Boomers— Millennials—those born roughly must now ensure that they are between 1980 and 1995—now attracting Millennials onto their teams constitute the largest generational or risk a serious shortage of qualified 10 ENGINEERING INTELLIGENCE REVIEW | Winter/Spring 2018 | SPECIAL EDITION IHS1217_10-13_CrossGen_JY.indd 10 12/6/17 9:10 AM GENERATION GAP company,” says Boettger, who also is editor for the IEEE PCS Professional Engineering Communication Series published by Wiley. “Millennials have different expectations: They want to be seen as being on the same level as their more senior colleagues—not necessarily from a pay perspective, but from a value perspective.” These inter-generational differences set up a potential conflict between, on the one hand, Baby Boomers and Gen Xers, who might feel that Millennials should naturally follow the same path they did—“grinding it out” for years before earning recognition—and Millennials, who might be more inclined to simply go elsewhere in search of an environment that provides more rapid—if not instantaneous— gratification. engineers, as well as a catastrophic “job-hoppers” —engaged so they don’t Whether Millennials actually are any brain drain as the Baby Boomers retire leave the organization after only a few more inclined to “job hop” than prior out of the workforce. years. Let’s start by looking at these generations is the subject of debate Demographic trends, however, two challenges. among social scientists. A recent Pew present a further challenge for Research article by Richard Fry, for engineering leaders: Millennials are INTEGRATION & ENGAGEMENT example, suggests, “Among the college- more numerous than Gen Xers, but Raise the issue of Millennials educated, Millennials have longer track as a group, they are not producing any with a senior engineering leader, records with their employers than higher percentage of STEM (Science, and inevitably the term Generation X workers Technology, Engineering, Math) “entitled” comes up. That’s did in 2000 when they graduates than their generational perhaps not surprising, as were the same age as predecessors, according to government today’s senior engineers today’s Millennials.” data. A recent report from ABET, naturally view Millennials Nevertheless, the the group that accredits college and through the lens of their perception persists that university engineering programs, points own experience, says Millennials are less loyal to a shortage of about 1 million STEM Dr. Ryan Boettger, to a given employer than graduates over the next decade. associate professor Dr. Ryan Boettger, past cohorts. Fred Filler, These trends put a premium on an of technical University of North Texas a product manager in the engineering organization’s ability not communication at the Engineering & Product only to recruit fresh talent, but also University of North Texas. Design Business at IHS Markit, points on its ability to integrate Millennials “When Baby Boomers were coming out that Millennials are often viewed —often labeled as “entitled”—into into the workforce, they were told as not being as “performance-driven” existing engineering teams, hierarchies not to expect anything until they as prior generations. “They are seen as and processes. In addition, engineering reached age 40 in terms of promotion more ‘experience-driven.’ They might leaders must ensure they are keeping or advancement. You kept your migrate frequently between jobs, not these young recruits—perceived as head down and you stuck with the because they feel like they’re stuck in SPECIAL EDITION | Winter/Spring 2018 | ENGINEERING INTELLIGENCE REVIEW 11 IHS1217_10-13_CrossGen_JY.indd 11 12/6/17 9:10 AM GENERATION GAP a nowhere job or they’re looking to Millennials,” Boettger says. “It’s also messages and tweets, if not simply an get more money or a better title. They about giving them the skill sets they emoticon, to express their point. At the simply have a ‘carpe diem’ attitude,” need to be productive, including same time, Millennials’ early exposure says Filler. the ability to convey complex data to technology has created expectations and information in a way that is that these “digital natives” would APPRENTICESHIP APPROACH understandable to their target audience.” automatically know how to process In response, Boettger sees Filler says that encouraging and analyze data. “That’s a fallacy some organizations adopting a cross-generational interaction because basic human cognition doesn’t mentorship-type model as a tool for and communication in these ways change,” says Boettger. “Just because intergenerational integration and ultimately provides opportunities for you’re surrounded and consumed by engagement—not a formal, one-on- both senior engineers one mentor model, but a more organic, and the organization as team-based model that would be very a whole to benefit from common in a project-based setting at the fresh perspectives an engineering firm. Different team that Millennials bring to members, across different generations, the table. “Engineering come together around a common goal, leaders should recognize but work on their own set of defined that—unlike generations tasks that, in the case of Millennials, before them—Millennials makes them feel like they’re a valued aren’t as tied to the status contributor to the success of the quo and may be more overall project. adept at thinking about “IN SOME WAYS, THE SOPHISTICATION “It becomes like an apprenticeship perennial problems in OF THE TECHNOLOGY HAS TAKEN model,” says Boettger. “It’s the perfect nontraditional ways THE GUESSWORK OUT OF THE work environment for Millennials and creating innovative because it’s spontaneous and it’s solutions,” says Filler. INFORMATION, AND PEOPLE WILL continually evolving. That gives JUST ACCEPT THE INFORMATION “DIGITAL NATIVES,” Millennials something they need, UNCRITICALLY.” — BOETTGER which is going to help with their DIGITAL DANGERS retention, but it also gives them the Regarding the contrasting attitudes information doesn’t mean that you structure that they require.” of Baby Boomers and Millennials on know how to use it.” In addition, this project-based the use and usefulness of technology, Filler says that, in a sense, the approach provides Millennials with Selinger describes a conversation with instantaneous nature of the internet— exposure to other generations and a senior engineering leader that he “Just Google it!” —has created two opportunities for learning at the same mentors. She was resisting using Twitter potential issues for engineering time—the opportunity to “do what as a communication tool to coordinate organizations. First, the expectation that they do,” as Selinger says, the chance among a group of younger engineers we can have the answer to any question to assimilate both technical knowledge that she was leading on a business trip, at our fingertips with a few keystrokes. and soft skills from their more senior Selinger relates. “I told her, ‘Twitter is And second, the expectation that we colleagues. free. If they want to communicate that can find the best answer at the top of Boettger also suggests engineering way, get a Twitter account and see how it our search results list, regardless of the firms think about ways to throw their works.’ When she got back, I asked her source of the information. young engineers out of their comfort how it went, and she said it was fine.” On the first issue, Filler says, zone. For example, have them go on a Millennials are, indeed, the “Millennials are not necessarily going site visit to a different firm, and then generation that grew up alongside to sit down with an engineering book have them write a site report. Send the internet and at the epicenter of and read it cover to cover. They’re them to a conference where they can the explosion in mobile computing going to read enough to get an answer sit and listen to experts, and then have and communications. Where Baby or solve a problem, and then come them write a trip report. Boomers typed memos, and Gen Xers back to it when they need to.” It’s “It’s not all about accommodating sent emails, Millennials favor text not only a function of the technology 12 ENGINEERING INTELLIGENCE REVIEW | Winter/Spring 2018 | SPECIAL EDITION IHS1217_10-13_CrossGen_JY.indd 12 12/6/17 9:10 AM GENERATION GAP they’ve been exposed to, Filler adds.
Recommended publications
  • Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace
    Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Mountain States Employers Council Evan Abbott Guess When? “Pupils entering school cannot write well. Their thoughts are immature, they are miserably expressed, and they do not know how to spell.” Guess Who? “The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority. They show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents and tyrannize their teachers.” 1 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Overview The Next Generations 1.0 Generations 2.0 Applications Workforce • Generations • Work Ethic and • Labor Market • Workplace Construct Commitment • Baby Boomers, • Work practices • Key Concepts • Communication Xers & & Technology Millennials Gen 1.0: What Do You Know? Silent Baby Generation Boomers Generation Millennials X Generational Peer group = a group whose members share a common historical location and have similar experiences Generation Born Raised Silent 1923-1946 30s, 40s, 50s Baby Boomers 1946-1963 50s, 60s, 70s Generation X 1963-1980 70s, 80s, 90s Millennials 1980-2000 90s - today 2 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Adversity Family Influences Diversity Organizations Economy Technology Gen 2.0 FACT Silent Baby Generation Boomers or Generation Millennials X FICTION 3 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace Values Attitudes Beliefs Experiences Expectations Behaviors Communication & Technology Silent Generation X Baby Boomers Millennials Work Ethic Silent Baby Boomers Generation X Millenials 4 Generations 2.0: Rebooting Generations in the Workplace What’s Next? Silent Baby Generation Boomers Generation Millennials X The Next Workforce: Boomers No Longer in their “Prime” Move of the Median Here to stay .
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Disconnect: Generational Stereotypes Between
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Liberty University Digital Commons Communication Disconnect: Generational Stereotypes between Generation X/Y and Baby Boomers in American and Chinese Organizational Communication _____________________________ Presented to the Faculty of Liberty University School of Communication _____________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Master of Arts In Communication Studies by Yuxiang Du April 2011 Running head: COMMUNICATION DISCONNET ii Thesis Committee _________________________________________________ Faith E. Mullen, Ph.D., Chair Date _________________________________________________ William L. Mullen, Ph.D., Date _________________________________________________ Cecil V. Kramer, Jr., D. Min. Date Running head: COMMUNICATION DISCONNET iii This thesis is dedicated to My mother, Fanghua Zhang, who taught me everything about love My sister and her husband, Yuyan and David Moore, who showed me how to live a life Huanghuang, my love of seven years and counting Running head: COMMUNICATION DISCONNET iv Abstract This research explores organizational communication between Generation X/Y and the Baby Boomers within the American and Chinese groups using social identity theory. Twenty participants were interviewed about their opinions on this issue. Thematic analysis was used to examine themes in the responses. The themes were organized into six categories: outlining Generation X/Y, outlining Baby Boomers, generational communication, generational stereotypes, cultural influences, and favorable solutions. Two referent elements were used through the whole discussion, social identity and cultural characteristics. The study revealed a strong social identity with all the four generational groups, difficulties in communication and stereotypes because of the identities. Collectivistic elements such as respect, care, harmony, conflict avoidance were spotted from the responses of the Chinese participants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Generation Gap: a Comparison of the Negative Portrayals of Hippies and Generation Xers
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006) Honors Program 1995 The generation gap: A comparison of the negative portrayals of hippies and Generation Xers Greg Becker University of Northern Iowa Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy Copyright ©1995 Greg Becker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pst Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Becker, Greg, "The generation gap: A comparison of the negative portrayals of hippies and Generation Xers" (1995). Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006). 39. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/pst/39 This Open Access Presidential Scholars Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors Program at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Presidential Scholars Theses (1990 – 2006) by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Generation Gap: A comparison of the negative portrayals of Hippies and Generation Xers Presented by: Greg Becker March 15, 1995 Presidential Scholars Senior Project Generation Gap 1 ABSTRACT The term "generation gap" is usually used to describe a situation in which a division develops between generations. The tension results from one generation, usually the younger generation, possessing a set of values and beliefs that are consistently different from the values and beliefs of another generation, usually the older generation. A comparison of newspaper articles concerning both Hippies and Generation Xers was conducted to illustrate the contention that generational conflict occurs in a cyclical pattern with each successive generation. The older generation usually portrays the younger generation in a negative manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Closing the Generation Gap: Understanding Millennials
    CLOSING THE GENERATION GAP: UNDERSTANDING MILLENNIALS By SHAUN BROCK A capstone submitted to the Graduate School-Camden Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts Graduate Program in Liberal Studies Written under the direction of Dr. Jon Cabiria And approved by ______________________________ Dr. Jon Cabiria Camden, New Jersey January 2018 CAPSTONE ABSTRACT Closing the generation gap: Understanding millennials By SHAUN BROCK Capstone Director: Dr. Cabiria Individual generations have been well researched and reported along with their impacts in the work environment. The object of this study was to investigate the differences between generations, specifically the differences that arose as a resolute of the environment in which different generations were raised, both technologically and culturally. The research found that each generation grew up under vastly different circumstances and, as a result of this, their values, motivators and influences are also vastly different. These differences begin as they progressed through Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and as they move from one psychosocial crisis to the next. Additionally, this study showed that each generation was at a different developmental stage in their lives, and, as a result, they placed value on different things. Each generation values what they do, this is the commonality that they must focus on. This focus can result in mentorship opportunities between all generations to further develop themselves as a society. ii List of Illustrations 1. The ROC Group. (2017). Working with Different Generations. Retrieved from Midwest Business Group on Health: https://www.mbgh.org/ctk/newitem2/workingwithdifferentgenerations 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Workplace Needs and Their Support; Are Millennials Different from Other Generations?
    TWENTY FIFTH ANNUAL PACIFIC-RIM REAL ESTATE SOCIETY CONFERENCE MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA, 14-16 JANUARY 2019 WORKPLACE NEEDS AND THEIR SUPPORT; ARE MILLENNIALS DIFFERENT FROM OTHER GENERATIONS? APPEL-MEULENBROEK, R., VOSTERS, S., KEMPERMAN, A. and ARENTZE, T. Eindhoven University of Technology, the Netherlands ABSTRACT Nowadays, employees are seen as key assets of knowledge organisations who increasingly struggle to attract the best potential talent from a declining workforce. The office environment is considered to be an important way to support the needs of the newest generation – the millennials – and thus attract and retain them. This study therefore aimed to create more evidence-based insights for Corporate Real Estate Managers (CREM) in how to support specific workplace needs of millennials. The three most important workplace needs of millennials were first identified as sociability with colleagues, opportunity to grow and work-life balance, followed by analyses of how the physical workplace is expected to best support them. Next, hypotheses were developed and tested on differences between millennials and other generations on these needs and the perceived workplace support. A survey among 302 Dutch office employees from 3 generations provided the necessary data, which were tested with bivariate correlation and ANOVA analysis. Findings indicate that millennials attach more value to the need for coaching and professional growth and less value to the balance between leisure and work than generation X does. Regarding physical workplace aspects, in total thirteen unique physical workplace aspects were identified as perceived support for workplace needs. Again millennials differed from generation X, as they found accessibility of colleagues and informal work areas/break-out zones more important in support of their need for sociability with colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Generations: a Timeless Notion Within a Contemporary Context
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by CU Scholar Institutional Repository University of Colorado, Boulder CU Scholar Undergraduate Honors Theses Honors Program Spring 2016 The tudS y of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context Lauren M. Troksa University of Colorado Boulder, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholar.colorado.edu/honr_theses Part of the American Popular Culture Commons, Cultural History Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Labor History Commons, Public History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Troksa, Lauren M., "The tudyS of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context" (2016). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1169. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Honors Program at CU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of CU Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Study of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context By Lauren Troksa Department of History at the University of Colorado Boulder Defended: April 4, 2016 Thesis Advisor: Professor Phoebe Young, Dept. of History Defense Committee: Professor Phoebe Young, Dept. of History Professor Mithi Mukherjee, Dept. of History Professor Vanessa Baird, Dept. of Political Science The Study of Generations: A Timeless Notion within a Contemporary Context Author: Lauren Troksa (University of Colorado Boulder, Spring 2016) Abstract: The study of generations has been timeless. Dating as far back as Plato’s time (428 B.C.E) to present-day (2016), scholars of all fields have used generations to study large trends that emerge over time in specific groups of people.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns Final
    ‘Generation Me’: A product of circumstance or doomed to repeat? An American Perspective Candidate: Elleanor Benbow (4183022) Patterns of Action Dissertation Word count: 3,746 ‘Generation Me’: A product of circumstance or doomed to repeat? An American Perspective The claim that each generation is not as good as the one that came before it is an age-old tale. However, this essay intends to investigate whether these generations are so-called ‘worse’ 1 due to the events that each generation experiences during its maturation, or due to its pre- determined role throughout time. Schaie (1965) describes a generation as a cohort and individuals that are born around a similar time and who share distinctive and important social or historical events during their lives during periods of critical development. This essay will describe and compare the characteristics of the Baby Boomer generation, Generation X and the Millennial generation and determine whether the traits that are most associated with each generation are the product of the events that have helped shaped their lives, or whether they are due to an ongoing cycle of generations, which has been played out for centuries throughout human history. Though there is much debate regarding the birth dates for each generation, the Baby Boomer generation (hereafter ‘Boomers’) was born during the post-World War II baby boom, between the years of 1946-1964 (Colby & Ortman, 2014), Generation X as being born from 1965- 1981 (Twenge et al., 2010) and Millennials, or ‘Generation Me’ (Twenge, 2006), having been born during or after 1980 (Ng, Schweitzer and Lyons 2010) until the mid-2000s, though Ng, Lyons and Schweitzer argue that due to the debate surrounding the start and end years of each generation that these should be used as frames of reference for the continuous flow of social change, rather than the firm boundaries of birth years.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION: a Demographic Bridge to America's Diverse Future
    THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION: A demographic bridge to America’s diverse future William H. Frey January 2018 Overview The millennial generation, over 75 million strong will affect their current and future quality of is America’s largest—eclipsing the current size of life—including their health and well-being as this the postwar baby boom generation. While much generation ages. attention has been given to this generation’s unique attributes—its technological savvy, its The national picture of a population that is tolerance and independence, and its aversion to diversifying in its younger ages while its white large institutions—one aspect of millennials is population is rapidly aging is an oversimplification most relevant to its future impact on the nation: because it does not account for variation among its racial and ethnic diversity. states and metropolitan areas. Although the public and media attention tends to focus on the The millennial generation is the demographic lives of millennials in high-profile markets such as “bridge” to the nation’s diverse future. By the mid- New York, Washington, D.C., and San Francisco, 2040s, racial and ethnic minorities are projected local contexts for the social and economic to make up over half of all Americans, but the opportunities available to millennials differ widely 2020 census will show that the postmillennial across the country. generation—people who are younger than millennials—will already be minority white. This This report, its appendices, and its associated means that millennials, now 44 percent minority, interactive website examine the demographic will pave the way for the generations behind them makeup of millennials for the nation, the 100 as workers, consumers, and leaders in business largest metropolitan areas, and all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Stereotypes Cecelia Parks University of Mississippi, [email protected]
    University of Mississippi eGrove Library Publications Library 2018 Generational Stereotypes Cecelia Parks University of Mississippi, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/libpubs Recommended Citation Hayes, J., Parks, C., McNeilly, S., & Johnson, P. (2018). Boomers to Millennials: Generational stereotypes at work in academic librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(6), 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.011 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Library at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Library Publications by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 Preprint of: Hayes, J., Parks, C., McNeilly, S., & Johnson, P. (2018). Boomers to Millennials: Generational stereotypes at work in academic librarianship. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(6), 845-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.09.011 Abstract Over the past 30 years, as the American workforce has become more generationally diverse, library administrators and academic librarians alike have focused on navigating dynamics that arise in a multigenerational workplace. Much scholarly research has been conducted on generational differences; however, most of this research assumes that the individuals studied adhere to or believe in generational stereotypes. This exploratory study used a hybrid experience-perception survey to examine the role or influence generational stereotypes have on academic librarians and how those stereotypes influence the academic library workforce. While few specific generational stereotypes were found to be held by participants, perceptions of generational stereotypes still have a significant influence in academic librarians’ interactions with their colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Generation of Workers the Next Generation of Workers
    The Next Generation of Workers the Next GeNerAtioN of Workers Prepared by Lily Guthrie Proof Readers Barbara Akers Carey Nash Production Artist Carissa Lozano About the office of the future Created by Marjorie Blanchard, PhD, the Office of the Future’s function is to study and report on emerging trends in leadership, technology, and other workplace issues. Another primary role is to challenge the company’s status quo and act as a catalyst for change that will ensure the company’s continued vitality and success. Its findings and reports are available to clients and other organizations to assist with planning for the future and to the media for their use in keeping their readers advised of trends in the workplace. This document is a summary of research compiled and prepared by The Ken Blanchard Companies, Office of the Future. It is available in PDF format. For further information, contact Lily Guthrie at 800 728-6000 or [email protected]. 12309D • 09/09 THE NEXT GENERATION OF WORKERS Table of Contents INTRODUCTION The Four Generations ...............................................................................................................2 Four Generations Working—or Not Working—Together ..........................................................3 Beliefs and Values Development ..............................................................................................4 Bridging the Intergenerational Gap ...........................................................................................5 Workplace Traits Most
    [Show full text]
  • Bridging the Generation Gap NUDC Webinar for Toolkit
    Bridging the Generation Gap Danette Scudder, Executive Vice President, Member Services and Strategic Relations Tennessee Valley Public Power Association (TVPPA) 1 “If the different generations are to thrive – not just survive – we need translators and interpreters rather than declarations of war.” Mary Pipher Axis & Allies 1941, Wizards of the Coast Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 2 Why$Should$ICare? Generational Differences can be a cause of conflict in the workplace: • Reduced profitability • Loss of valuable employees • High payroll costs • Poor customer service • Derailed careers • Wasted human capital Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 3 DefiningOurselves What Defines a Generation? •Groups of people marked by the year of their birth •And, their subsequent value system influences Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 4 It’s$Not$MY$Fault… What Shapes a Generation? A common set of social and historic events that impact attitudes, ambitions and world views •People •Places •Things •Events Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 5 AskYourself… •What/who most influenced your perspective growing up? •What events or “personalities” do you remember from your childhood? Type your comments in the chat box Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 6 “What$factorsshapedyour$perspective$most$when youwere$growingup?” (critical$factors$across$all$agegroups): A. Influence of parents and family B. Influence of friends and peers C. Religion and church experiences D. Influence of teachers E. Managers and supervisors (From E-HResources.com survey (August 2004)) Bridging the Generation Gap January 23, 2018 7 Roll$Call There are 5 ( and a 1/2) Generations in the Workplace Today: • Traditional (1928-1945) – 2% of workforce • Baby Boomers (1946-1964) – 29% of workforce • Generation X (1965-1980) – 34% of workforce • Xennials (1977-1983) – 10% of workforce* • Millennials (1981-1999) – 34% of workforce • Generation Z (2000-present)- 1% of workforce (2015 demographic data from Pew Research Center/*Huffington Post article and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation Gaps
    Generation Gaps Training Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS Module One: Getting Started .............................................................................................................2 Module Two: History..........................................................................................................................4 Module Three: Traditionalist ..............................................................................................................7 Module Four: Baby Boomers ..............................................................................................................9 Module Five: Generation X ............................................................................................................... 11 Module Six: Generation Y ............................................................................................................... 133 Module Seven: Generation Z .......................................................................................................... 155 Module Eight: Differentiations Between ......................................................................................... 177 Module Nine: Finding Common Ground .......................................................................................... 200 Module Ten: Finding Common Ground ………………………………………………………………….………………………..203 Module Eleven: Conflict Management (II) ....................................................................................... 256 Module Twelve: Wrapping Up .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]