Arxiv:1710.00984V1 [Astro-Ph.GA] 3 Oct 2017

Submitted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 THE VMC SURVEY XXVII. YOUNG STELLAR STRUCTURES IN THE LMC’S BAR STAR-FORMING COMPLEX Ning-Chen Sun1,2, Richard de Grijs1,2,3, Smitha Subramanian1, Kenji Bekki4, Cameron P. M. Bell5, Maria-Rosa L. Cioni5,6,7, Valentin D. Ivanov8,9, Marcella Marconi10, Joana M. Oliveira11, Andres´ E. Piatti12,13, Vincenzo Ripepi10, Stefano Rubele14,15, Ben L. Tatton11, Jacco Th. van Loon11 1Kavli Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Lu 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100871, China; [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Astronomy, Peking University, Yi He Yuan Lu 5, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100871, China 3International Space Science Institute – Beijing, 1 Nanertiao, Hai Dian District, Beijing 100190, China 4ICRAR, M468, The University of Western Australia 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley Western Australia, 6009, Australia 5Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam, An der Sternwarte 16, Potsdam 14482, Germany 6Universität Potsdam, Institut für Physik und Astronomie, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24/25, Potsdam 14476, Germany 7University of Hertfordshire, Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB, UK 8ESO European Southern Observatory, Ave. Alonso de Cordova 3107, Casilla 19, Chile 9ESO Garching: ESO, Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching bei München, Germany 10INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Salita Moiariello, 16, I-80131 Napoli, Italy 11School of Chemical & Physical Sciences, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, ST5 5BG, UK 12Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Laprida 854, 5000, Córdoba, Argentina 13Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient´ıficas y Técnicas, Av. Rivadavia 1917, C1033AAJ Buenos Aires, Argentina 14Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova – INAF, vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, Padova I-35122, Italy 15Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universitàdi Padova, vicolo dell’Osservatorio 2, Padova I-35122, Italy Submitted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal ABSTRACT Star formation is a hierarchical process, forming young stellar structures of star clusters, associations, and complexes over a wide scale range. The star-forming complex in the bar region of the Large Magellanic Cloud is investigated with upper main-sequence stars observed by the VISTA Survey of the Magellanic Clouds. The upper main-sequence stars exhibit highly non-uniform distributions. Young stellar structures inside the complex are identified from the stellar density map as density enhancements of different significance levels. We find that these structures are hierarchically organized such that larger, lower-density structures contain one or several smaller, higher-density ones. They follow power-law size and mass distributions as well as a lognormal surface density distribution. All these results support a scenario of hierarchical star formation regulated by turbulence. The temporal evolution of young stellar structures is explored by using subsamples of upper main-sequence stars with different magnitude and age ranges. While the youngest subsample, with a median age of log(τ/yr) = 7.2, contains most substructure, progressively older ones are less and less substructured. The oldest subsample, with a median age of log(τ/yr) = 8.0, is almost indistinguishable from a uniform distribution on spatial scales of 30–300 pc, suggesting that the young stellar structures are completely dispersed on a timescale of 100 Myr. These results are consistent with the characteristics of the 30 Doradus complex and the∼ entire Large Magellanic Cloud, suggesting no significant environmental effects. We further point out that the fractal dimension may be method-dependent for stellar samples with significant age spreads. Subject headings: infrared: stars – Magellanic Clouds – stars: formation 1. INTRODUCTION fore they are completely dispersed (Gieles et al. 2008; arXiv:1710.00984v1 [astro-ph.GA] 3 Oct 2017 It has been suggested that star formation is a hier- Bastian et al. 2009; Gouliermis et al. 2015). Beyond this archical process, forming young stellar structures over simple picture, however, more exploration is needed to a wide range of scales (Efremov & Elmegreen 1998; fully understand their properties, formation, evolution, Elmegreen et al. 2000; Elmegreen 2011; Gusev 2014; and especially the roles played by related physical pro- Gouliermis et al. 2015, 2017; Sun et al. 2017). These cesses (e.g. gravity, turbulence, galactic dynamics, etc.). structures include, for increasing size and decreasing den- Stellar complexes are important nurseries of new sity, star clusters, associations, and complexes. Stud- stars. They usually have kiloparsec scales and con- ies of local star-forming regions (e.g. Gomez et al. 1993; tain smaller young stellar structures such as associa- Larson 1995; Simon 1997; Kraus & Hillenbrand 2008) tions and aggregates, which themselves are subclustered and nearby galaxies (e.g. Elmegreen & Elmegreen 2001; into compact star clusters (Efremov 1995). Star for- Elmegreen et al. 2006; Gouliermis et al. 2010, 2015, mation in stellar complexes is not only influenced by 2017) suggest that the young stellar structures dis- global galactic properties, e.g. bars and spiral arms play a high degree of substructuring and fractal prop- (Binney & Merrifield 1998), but also regulated by lo- erties, which may be inherited from the natal gas from cal processes, e.g. gravity, turbulence, magnetic field, which they form. After birth, the young stellar struc- and stellar feedback (Mac Low & Klessen 2004). On tures evolve rapidly toward uniform distributions be- the other hand, the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) are close neighbors of the Milky Way at 2 Sun et al. distances of 50 and 60 kpc, respectively (de Grijs et al. Section 2 for the definition of a tile). The bar com- 2014; de Grijs & Bono 2015). The LMC is the proto- plex is an important component of the LMC. As an type of barred Magellanic spiral galaxies. It has a flat active star-forming nursery, it is abundant in molecular stellar disk, a single-looping spiral arm, a stellar bar gas, H II regions, young stellar objects, and star clusters which is off-centered from the galaxy’s dynamical cen- (e.g. Fukui et al. 2008; Carlson et al. 2012; Piatti et al. ter, and a large star-forming complex at the northwest- 2015). The previous studies of Bastian et al. (2009) and ern end of the bar (Wilcots 2009). The SMC, however, Bonatto & Bica (2010), however, have used small sam- is a late-type dwarf galaxy, with an elongated, cigar- ples or subsamples, which contain several hundreds or shaped structure seen edge-on (D’Onghia & Fox 2016). thousands of objects. As a result, they do not provide They show signatures of interactions with one another sufficient spatial sampling to resolve the detailed inner as well as with the Milky Way’s gravitational poten- structures of the bar complex. On the other hand, per- tial and halo gas (de Boer et al. 1998; D’Onghia & Fox turbations from the bar (Gardiner et al. 1998; but see 2016; Belokurov et al. 2017; Subramanian et al. 2017). Harris & Zaritsky 2009 for a discussion against a dy- Both Clouds exhibit active past and ongoing star for- namical bar) may have an influence on the bar complex; mation (Harris & Zaritsky 2004, 2009; Oliveira 2009; compared with the galaxy outskirts, it is less affected Rubele et al. 2012, 2015). As a result, stellar complexes by external tidal forces (e.g. Fujimoto & Noguchi 1990; in the Magellanic Clouds provide unique laboratories for Bekki & Chiba 2007; D’Onghia & Fox 2016). It still re- understanding young stellar structures. mains unexplored whether these environmental processes Bastian et al. (2009) studied stellar structures in the cause any difference in the properties, formation, and LMC. Based on young massive (OB) stars, they found evolution of the young stellar structures in the bar com- that their identified stellar groups have no characteristic plex. length scale and exhibit a power-law luminosity func- The goal of this paper is to understand the properties, tion with index 2. Using stellar subsamples of differ- formation, and evolution of young stellar structures in ent ages, they showed− that while stars are born with a the bar complex. Using wide color and magnitude cuts, high degree of substructuring, older subsamples are pro- we construct a sample of more than 2.5 104 upper-MS gressively less clumpy, reaching a uniform distribution at stars younger than 1 Gyr, an order of× magnitude more 175 Myr. Bonatto & Bica (2010) investigated the spa- than the previous samples∼ mentioned above. The sample tial∼ correlation of star clusters and “non-clusters” (which provides sufficient spatial sampling, allowing us to iden- are basically nebula complexes and stellar associations) tify young stellar structures on scales &10 pc. We then in the Magellanic Clouds. Using two-point correlation analyze the properties of these structures and discuss the functions (TPCFs), they found that young star clusters effects of physical processes associated with their forma- present a high degree of spatial correlation with them- tion. We also use TPCFs to study the degree of sub- selves and with non-clusters, which does not occur for structuring in upper-MS subsamples of different magni- old star clusters. They also noticed that star clusters tude and age ranges, which will help demonstrate any (young and old) and non-clusters all have power-law size evolution of the young stellar structures. We discuss the distributions but with different slopes. In general, these environmental effects through comparisons with other re- results are in agreement with the scenario referred to gions or with the entire LMC. above. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes Both studies focused on the global population of young the data used in this work. Our selection of upper-MS stellar structures across the entire LMC (and SMC). stars and their spatial distributions are outlined in Sec- Thus, they do not reveal whether there is any envi- tion 3.

Load more