DOCSLIB.ORG

The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1 The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1 with an introductory essay by John B. Firth The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1 Table of Contents The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1............................................................................................1 with an introductory essay by John B. Firth..................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................................3 BOOK I.....................................................................................................................................................................11 1.I.−−TO SEPTICIUS..................................................................................................................................11 1.II.−−TO ARRIANUS................................................................................................................................11 1.III.−−TO CANINIUS RUFUS..................................................................................................................11 1.IV.−−TO POMPEIA CELERINA............................................................................................................12 1.V.−−TO VOCONIUS ROMANUS..........................................................................................................12 1.VI.−−TO CORNELIUS TACITUS..........................................................................................................13 1.VII.−−TO OCTAVIUS RUFUS...............................................................................................................13 1.VIII.−−TO POMPEIUS SATURNINUS..................................................................................................14 1.IX.−−TO MINUTIUS FUNDANUS........................................................................................................15 1.X.−−TO ATTIUS CLEMENS..................................................................................................................16 1.XI.−−TO FABIUS JUSTUS.....................................................................................................................16 1.XII.−−TO CALESTRIUS TIRO...............................................................................................................16 1.XIII.−−TO SOSIUS SENECIO................................................................................................................17 1.XIV.−−TO JUNIUS MAURICUS............................................................................................................18 1.XV.−−TO SEPTICIUS CLARUS.............................................................................................................19 1.XVI.−−TO ERUCIUS...............................................................................................................................19 1.XVII.−−TO CORNELIUS TITIANUS.....................................................................................................20 1.XVIII.−−TO SUETONIUS TRANQUILLUS..........................................................................................20 1.XIX.−−TO ROMANUS FIRMUS............................................................................................................20 1.XX.−−TO CORNELIUS TACITUS.........................................................................................................21 1.XXI.−−TO PLINIUS PATERNUS...........................................................................................................22 1.XXII.−−TO CATILIUS SEVERUS.........................................................................................................23 1.XXIII.−−TO POMPEIUS FALCO...........................................................................................................24 1.XXIV.−−TO BAEBIUS HISPANUS.......................................................................................................24 2.I.−−TO ROMANUS..................................................................................................................................24 2.II.−−TO PAULINUS................................................................................................................................25 2.III.−−TO NEPOS......................................................................................................................................25 2.IV.−−TO CALVINA.................................................................................................................................26 2.V.−−TO LUPERCUS................................................................................................................................27 2.VI.−−TO AVITUS....................................................................................................................................27 2.VII.−−TO MACRINUS............................................................................................................................28 2.VIII.−−TO CANINIUS.............................................................................................................................28 2.IX.−−TO APOLLINARIS........................................................................................................................29 2.X.−−TO OCTAVIUS................................................................................................................................29 2.XI.−−TO ARRIANUS..............................................................................................................................30 2.XII.−−TO ARRIANUS.............................................................................................................................32 2.XIII.−−TO PRISCUS................................................................................................................................32 2.XIV.−−TO MAXIMUS............................................................................................................................33 2.XV.−−TO VALERIANUS........................................................................................................................34 2.XVI.−−TO ANNIANUS...........................................................................................................................34 2.XVII.−−TO GALLUS...............................................................................................................................34 2.XVIII.−−TO MAURICUS........................................................................................................................37 2.XIX.−−TO CERIALIS..............................................................................................................................37 2.XX.−−TO CALVISIUS............................................................................................................................38 i The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1 Table of Contents The Letters of the Younger Pliny, First Series. Vol 1 3.I.−−TO CALVISIUS.................................................................................................................................38 3.II.−−TO MAXIMUS.................................................................................................................................39 3.III.−−TO CORELLIA HISPULLA...........................................................................................................40 3.IV.−−TO MACRINUS..............................................................................................................................40 3.V.−−TO BAEBIUS MACER....................................................................................................................41 3.VI.−−TO ANNIUS SEVERUS.................................................................................................................42 3.VII.−−TO CANINIUS RUFUS................................................................................................................43 3.VIII.−−TO SUETONIUS TRANQUILLUS.............................................................................................43 3.IX.−−TO CORNELIUS MINICIANUS...................................................................................................44 3.X.−−TO VESTRICIUS SPURINNA AND HIS WIFE COTTIA............................................................46 3.XI.−−TO JULIUS GENITOR...................................................................................................................47 3.XII.−−TO CATILIUS SEVERUS............................................................................................................47 3.XII.−−TO VOCONIUS ROMANUS........................................................................................................48 3.XIV.−−TO ACILIUS................................................................................................................................48 3.XV.−−TO SILIUS PROCULUS...............................................................................................................48 3.XVI.−−TO NEPOS...................................................................................................................................49 3.XVII.−−TO JULIUS SERVIANUS..........................................................................................................50 3.XVIII.−−TO CURIUS SEVERUS............................................................................................................50
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Satyricon of Petronius Arbiter
    Satyricon of Petronius Arbiter Translated by Firebaugh Satyricon of Petronius Arbiter Table of Contents Satyricon of Petronius Arbiter..........................................................................................................................1 Translated by Firebaugh..........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................5 I................................................................................................................................................................6 II THE AUTHOR....................................................................................................................................6 III REALISM...........................................................................................................................................8 IV FORGERIES OF PETRONIUS.........................................................................................................9 VOLUME 1.ADVENTURES OF ENCOLPIUS AND HIS COMPANIONS................................................11 CHAPTER THE FIRST.........................................................................................................................11 CHAPTER THE SECOND...................................................................................................................12 CHAPTER THE THIRD.......................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Rebellious Legions and Senatorial Delegations: Tacitus’ Histories 1.19 and 1.74
    Rebellious Legions and Senatorial Delegations: Tacitus’ Histories 1.19 and 1.74 Reports of the revolt of the Fourth and Twenty-Second Legions in Upper Germany during the first days of 69 prompted the Roman Senate to vote to send out a delegation. Tacitus discusses the make-up of this delegation in Histories 1.19.2. Members of the senate obviously were to participate, but there was also discussion secreto (Heubner 57; Sage ANRW II.33.2 899) as to whether Piso, newly adopted by Galba, should go “in order to add the prestige of a Caesar to the senate’s authority” (illi auctoritatem senatus, hic dignationem Caesaris laturus). The senate further resolved (placebat) to send Laco, the praetorian prefect, with the legati. Laco, however, refused (is consilio intercessit). At the end of Tacitus’ account we learn that the senate left the selection of the actual members of the delegation to Galba. The emperor consequently exposed the political nature of the delegation and the power struggles among the Romans by incompetently naming and then revising his list of envoys as they either begged to go or to stay in Rome, ut quemque metus uel spes impulerat. Otho recalled this delegation (1.74.2) after Galba’s murder and his own accession to power, only to send out another specie senatus (cf. Talbert 1984, 410), after adding praetorian guards per simulationem officii. In addition to being sent to the two legions in Upper Germany, Otho sent the delegation to the Italic Legion and an urban cohort stationed in Lugdunum. According to Tacitus, the praetorians were sent back without being granted the opportunity to “mix” (Damon 164) with the legions, although the senatorial envoys got to Vitellius and stayed with him longer than was justifiable (Chilver 137).
    [Show full text]
  • Shakespeare and the Classics
    SHAKESPEARE AND THE CLASSICS EDITED BY CHARLES MARTINDALE AND A. B. TAYLOR S CAMBRIDGE w UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Notes on contributors page x List of abbreviations xiii Introduction i PART I AN INITIAL PERSPECTIVE i Shakespeare and humanistic culture Colin Burrow PART II SMALL LATINE OVID 2 Petruchio is 'Kated': The Taming of the Shrew and Ovid 33 Vanda Zajko 3 Ovid's myths and the unsmooth course of love in A Midsummer Night's Dream 49 A. B. Taylor \ 4 Shakespeare's learned heroines in Ovid's schoolroom 66 Heather James VIRGIL 5 Shakespeare and Virgil 89 Charles Martindale PLAUTUS AND TERENCE 6 Shakespeare's reception of Plautus reconsidered 109 Wolfgang Riehle vii viii Contents 7 Shakespeare, Plautus, and the discovery of New Comic space 122 Raphael Lyne SENECA 8 'Confusion now hath made his masterpiece': Senecan resonances in Macbeth 141 Yves Peyre 9 'These are the only men': Seneca and monopoly in Hamlet 2.2 156 Erica Sheen PART III LESSE GREEK PLUTARCH 10 'Character' in Plutarch and Shakespeare: Brutus, Julius Caesar, and Mark Antony John Roe 11 Plutarch, Shakespeare, and the alpha males Gordon Braden GENERAL 12 Action at a Distance: Shakespeare and the Greeks A. D. Nuttall GREEK ROMANCES 13 Shakespeare and Greek romance: 'Like an old tale still'; Stuart Gillespie GREEK TRAGEDY 14 Shakespeare and Greek tragedy: strange relationship Michael Silk PART IV THE RECEPTION OF SHAKESPEARE S CLASSICISM 15 'The English Homer': Shakespeare, Longinus, and English 'neo-classicism' David Hopkins Contents ix 16 'There is no end but addition': the later reception of Shakespeare's classicism 277 Sarah Annes Brown Select bibliography (compiled by Joanna Paul) 294 Index 311.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny the Elder and the Problem of Regnum Hereditarium*
    Pliny the Elder and the Problem of Regnum Hereditarium* MELINDA SZEKELY Pliny the Elder writes the following about the king of Taprobane1 in the sixth book of his Natural History: "eligi regem a populo senecta clementiaque, liberos non ha- bentem, et, si postea gignat, abdicari, ne fiat hereditarium regnum."2 This account es- caped the attention of the majority of scholars who studied Pliny in spite of the fact that this sentence raises three interesting and debated questions: the election of the king, deposal of the king and the heredity of the monarchy. The issue con- cerning the account of Taprobane is that Pliny here - unlike other reports on the East - does not only use the works of former Greek and Roman authors, but he also makes a note of the account of the envoys from Ceylon arriving in Rome in the first century A. D. in his work.3 We cannot exclude the possibility that Pliny himself met the envoys though this assumption is not verifiable.4 First let us consider whether the form of rule described by Pliny really existed in Taprobane. We have several sources dealing with India indicating that the idea of that old and gentle king depicted in Pliny's sentence seems to be just the oppo- * The study was supported by OTKA grant No. T13034550. 1 Ancient name of Sri Lanka (until 1972, Ceylon). 2 Plin. N. H. 6, 24, 89. Pliny, Natural History, Cambridge-London 1989, [19421], with an English translation by H. Rackham. 3 Plin. N. H. 6, 24, 85-91. Concerning the Singhalese envoys cf.
    [Show full text]
  • PRIMITIVE POLITICS: LUCAN and PETRONIUS Martha Malamud in Roman Literature, Politics and Morality Are Not Distinct Categories
    CHAPTER TWELVE PRIMITIVE POLITICS: LUCAN AND PETRONIUS Martha Malamud In Roman literature, politics and morality are not distinct categories: both are implicated in the construction and maintenance of structures of power. Roman virtues are the basis of the res publica, the body politic. In what follows, I take “politics” in a broad sense: “public or social ethics, that branch of moral philosophy dealing with the state or social organism as a whole.”1 As Edwards puts it, “issues which for many in the pres- ent day might be ‘political’ or ‘economic’ were moral ones for Roman writers, in that they linked them to the failure of individuals to control themselves.”2 What follows is a case study of how Lucan and Petronius deploy a pair of motifs popular in Roman moralizing discourse (primi- tive hospitality, as exemplifi ed by the simple meal, and primitive archi- tecture) in ways that refl ect on the politics of early imperial Rome. Embedded in the moralizing tradition is the notion of decline. Roman virtue is always situated in the past, and visions of the primitive, such as the rustic meal and the primitive hut, evoke comparisons with a corrupted present. These themes are present in Roman literature from an early period. Already by the third century bce, there is a growing preoccupation with a decline in ethical standards attributed to luxury and tied to the expansion of Roman power and changes in Rome’s political structure. Anxiety focused around luxurious foods, clothing, art, and architecture. As Purcell observes of Roman views of their own food history, “[d]iet-history is a subdivision of that much larger way of conceptualizing passing time, the history of moral decline and recovery; indeed, it is a way of indexing that history,”3 and one can say the same of architecture-history.
    [Show full text]
  • Brutus, Cassius, Judas, and Cremutius Cordus: How
    BRUTUS, CASSIUS, JUDAS, AND CREMUTIUS CORDUS: HOW SHIFTING PRECEDENTS ALLOWED THE LEX MAIESTATIS TO GROUP WRITERS WITH TRAITORS by Hunter Myers A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College. Oxford, Mississippi May 2018 Approved by ______________________________ Advisor: Professor Molly Pasco-Pranger ______________________________ Reader: Professor John Lobur ______________________________ Reader: Professor Steven Skultety © 2018 Hunter Ross Myers ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Dr. Pasco-Pranger, For your wise advice and helpful guidance through the thesis process Dr. Lobur & Dr. Skultety, For your time reading my work My parents, Robin Myers and Tracy Myers For your calm nature and encouragement Sally-McDonnell Barksdale Honors College For an incredible undergraduate academic experience iii ABSTRACT In either 103 or 100 B.C., a concept known as Maiestas minuta populi Romani (diminution of the majesty of the Roman people) is invented by Saturninus to accompany charges of perduellio (treason). Just over a century later, this same law is used by Tiberius to criminalize behavior and speech that he found disrespectful. This thesis offers an answer to the question as to how the maiestas law evolved during the late republic and early empire to present the threat that it did to Tiberius’ political enemies. First, the application of Roman precedent in regards to judicial decisions will be examined, as it plays a guiding role in the transformation of the law. Next, I will discuss how the law was invented in the late republic, and increasingly used for autocratic purposes. The bulk of the thesis will focus on maiestas proceedings in Tacitus’ Annales, in which a total of ten men lose their lives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2017 The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula. Erin Leigh Wotring University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, Intellectual History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Wotring, Erin Leigh, "The cultural creation of Fulvia Flacca Bambula." (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2691. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/2691 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History University of Louisville Louisville, KY May, 2017 Copyright 2017 by Erin Leigh Wotring All rights reserved THE CULTURAL CREATION OF FULVIA FLACCA BAMBULA By Erin Leigh Wotring A Thesis Approved on April 14, 2017 by the following Thesis Committee: Dr. Jennifer Westerfeld, Director Dr. Blake Beattie Dr. Carmen Hardin ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Epic Vantage-Point: Roman Historiographical Allusion Reconsidered
    Histos () – THE EPIC VANTAGE-POINT: ROMAN HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ALLUSION RECONSIDERED Abstract: This paper makes the case that Roman epic and Roman historiographical allusive practices are worth examining in light of each other, given the close relationship between the two genres and their common goal of offering their audiences access to the past. Ennius’ Annales will here serve as epic’s representative, despite its fragmentary state: the fact that the epic shares its subject-matter with and pre-dates most of the Roman historiographical tra- dition as we know it suggests that the poem may have had a significant role in setting the terms on which the two genres interacted at Rome; and what the first surviving generation of its readers, as principally represented by Cicero, have to say about the epic rather con- firms that suggestion (§I). Points of contact between the genres on which the paper focuses are: extended repetition of passages recognisable from previous authors (§II); allusion that is contested among the speakers of a given text (§III); citation practices (§IV); and the recur- rence of recognisable material stemming from the Annales in the historiographical tradition’s latter-day, when all sense of that material’s original context has been lost, along with its ability to generate new meaning (§V). n this paper,1 I consider how reading Ennius’ Annales can shed light on the extent to which allusion, as it operates in historiography, is differentiable I from allusion in other genres. David Levene has made the argument that historiography
    [Show full text]
  • Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire
    University of Adelaide Discipline of Classics Faculty of Arts Faunus and the Fauns in Latin Literature of the Republic and Early Empire Tammy DI-Giusto BA (Hons), Grad Dip Ed, Grad Cert Ed Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy October 2015 Table of Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................... 4 Thesis Declaration ................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 Context and introductory background ................................................................. 7 Significance ......................................................................................................... 8 Theoretical framework and methods ................................................................... 9 Research questions ............................................................................................. 11 Aims ................................................................................................................... 11 Literature review ................................................................................................ 11 Outline of chapters ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Idrografia Della Antica Città Di Altinum… 273
    INSTITUT DES CULTURES MÉDITERRANÉENNES ET ORIENTALES DE L’ACADÉMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES ÉTUDES et TRAVAUX XXV 2012 IWONA MODRZEWSKA-PIANETTI FRANCO PIANETTI Idrografi a della antica città di Altinum (al margine della laguna di Venezia) 270 IWONA MODRZEWSKA-PIANETTI, FRANCO PIANETTI Altinum era una città romana, posta al margine della laguna di Venezia, nei cui pressi sorge ora un piccolo borgo rurale chiamato Altino. Il luogo della città fu abitato nella preistoria e protostoria e divenne città romana nella prima metà del I secolo AC. Essa era un crocevia fra due importanti strade : la Claudia Augusta e l’Annia1. La localizzazione approssimata della città era nota, non si conosceva però l’ubicazione delle costruzioni del suo interno, quali le mura e l’anfi teatro. Dal rilevamento di campagna erano state individuate solo tracce di muratura2. Solo di recente mediante, l’elaborazione di foto aeree, è stata defi nita l’estensione della città e le particolarità dell’insediamento3. Riportiamo qui (fi g. 1) l’immagine conclusiva di questa ricerca. Si nota in essa il perimetro delle mura e la traccia di un probabile corso d’acqua (che appare di colore grigio chiaro nella fi gura), che attraversava la città e era collegato con la laguna. Altinum nell’antichità era situata, come Ravenna, nella palude4. Tale situazione sembra si sia mantenuta fi no ai giorni nostri cioè fi no alla esecuzione delle opere di bonifi ca parziale della fi ne dell ‘800 poi generale del ‘900. La zona in cui era collocata la città antica è una parte della pianura veneta occupata dal grande conoide (megafan) pleistocenico del fi ume Brenta5.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliny's "Vesuvius" Narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20)
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20) Citation for published version: Berry, D 2008, Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). in F Cairns (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . vol. 13, Francis Cairns Publications Ltd, pp. 297-313. Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Early version, also known as pre-print Published In: Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar Publisher Rights Statement: ©Berry, D. (2008). Letters from an advocate: Pliny's "Vesuvius" narratives (Epistles 6.16, 6.20). In F. Cairns (Ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar . (pp. 297-313). Francis Cairns Publications Ltd. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. Sep. 2021 LETTERS FROM AN ADVOCATE: Pliny’s ‘Vesuvius’ Narratives (Epp. 6.16, 6.20)* D.H. BERRY University of Edinburgh To us in the modern era, the most memorable letters of Pliny the Younger are Epp. 6.16 and 6.20, addressed to Cornelius Tacitus.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vestal Habit
    THE VESTAL HABIT Andrew B. Gallia* In her epochal study of the Vestal virgins, Mary Beard called attention to the ambiguous position of these priestesses in relation to the normative categories of gender in Roman society.1 Drawing on the insights of structural anthropology, she argued that this ambiguity was central to the Vestals’ sacredness. Essentially, her interpretation rests on the proposition that, by combining features relating to the status of unmarried daughters (virgines) with those of married women (matronae), the priestesses became in themselves vessels for the symbolic mediation between culturally opposed categories that Claude Lévi-Strauss, Mary Douglas, and others have identified as a central function of myth and ritual.2 Although the underlying observation about the peculiarity of the Vestals’ “sexual status” must ultimately be allowed to stand, more recent work on the inherent instability of categories of sex and gender suggests that we ought to revisit the problem of the priestesses’ ambiguity, paying closer attention to the socially contingent nature of its production.3 In this article, I will confine my discussion to an aspect of gender construction that Beard regarded as essential to establishing the matronal piece of the Vestals’ supposed interstitiality: * Published in Classical Philology 109.3 (2014). 1 Beard 1980. 2 Beard 1980, 23-4; cf. Lévi-Strauss 1955, 437-42; Douglas 1969, 163-70; Leach 1976, 34-6. 3 Butler 1990; Fausto Sterling 2000. For social-historical critiques of Beard’s original thesis, see Gardner 1986, 22-6; Cancik-Lindemaier 1990; Scardigli 2003; Gallia 2015. Note also the subsequent self-critique of Beard 1995, although this account is avowedly “not concerned with ‘how the facts fit’” (169).
    [Show full text]