Cercospora Leaf Spot in Sugar Beet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cercospora Leaf Spot in Sugar Beet Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet Epidemiology, life cycle components and disease management Jessica Vereijssen Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet Epidemiology, life cycle components and disease management Jessica Vereijssen Promotor prof. dr. MJ Jeger hoogleraar in de ecologische fytopathologie Co-promotoren dr. ir. JHM Schneider projectleider Stichting IRS, Bergen op Zoom dr. ir. AJ Termorshuizen universitair docent bij de leerstoelgroep Biologische Bedrijfssystemen Wageningen Universiteit Leden van de dr. MJC Asher promotie Broom’s Barn Research Station, Engeland commissie prof. dr. PW Crous Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht / Wageningen Universiteit / Stellenbosch University, Zuid Afrika prof. dr. A Stein Wageningen Universiteit / International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede prof. dr. ir. PC Struik Wageningen Universiteit The studies described in this thesis were part of the research program of the Graduate School PE&RC (Production Ecology and Resource Conservation). Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet Epidemiology, life cycle components and disease management Jessica Vereijssen Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor op gezag van de rector magnificus van Wageningen Universiteit, prof. dr. ir. L. Speelman in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 15 juni 2004 des namiddags te half twee in de Aula Bibliographic data Vereijssen J, 2004 Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet. Epidemiology, life cycle components and disease management. PhD thesis Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. With references – with summary in Dutch – 200 pp. ISBN 90-8504-065-5 The research presented in this thesis was conducted at Stichting IRS (Institute of Sugar Beet Research), Van Konijnenburgweg 24, 4611 HL, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands. Photos on cover by Jessica Vereijssen. Cover design by Miep Hazen and Jessica Vereijssen. Front: beet leaf with Cercospora leaf spot symptoms. Back: Cercospora field trial at Wijnandsrade (province of Limburg) in 2003. Figures on the first page of each chapter: individual Agronomica disease index figures (Agronomica, Ferrara and University of Piacenza). Abstract Cercospora beticola, the causal agent of Cercospora leaf spot (CLS) in sugar beet, causes reductions in sugar yield and financial returns. Section I describes the epidemiology of CLS. Two disease severity indices were compared and their relation with sugar yield modelled. A linear curve fitted the Agronomica disease severity index with sugar yield in both severely and mildly infected fields, whereas for a leaf disease severity assessment this relationship was exponential and linear, respectively. The Agronomica disease severity index was less laborious and improved disease assessment. Using spatial and temporal models, the within-row dependencies of CLS disease severities was demonstrated. However, disease increase on a given plant was largely determined by disease on that plant. Similarly when describing the within-plant dynamics of disease, it was concluded that the major determinant of disease increase on a given leaf layer on a plant was from disease on that leaf layer. Spraying a fungicide twice changed the contribution of the lower leaf layers. In one mildly infected field, these leaf layers were more often significant in the model; in the other severely infected field less often. In section II studies on the life cycle of CLS are reported. It was demonstrated that C. beticola is able to infect sugar beet through the root in glasshouse, climate room, and in field experiments. The genetic variability of C. beticola was studied in an international collection of isolates. Between and within geographic regions, genetic variability is high. A C. beticola specific PCR primer was developed, which enabled detection of C. beticola in plant tissue. We showed systemic growth of C. beticola in a sugar beet seedling after root infection. Section III describes the development of a supervised control system. The use of an action threshold involving two early sprays and weather-based treatments resulted in sugar yields and financial returns similar to calendar sprayed treatments, and saved up to two fungicide applications. Sail away with me honey I put my heart in your hands Sail away with me honey Now, now, now Sail away with me What will be will be I wanna hold you now, now, now (David Gray – Sail away) Contents Chapter 1 General Introduction 1 Section I Epidemiology of Cercospora beticola Chapter 2 Comparison of two disease assessment methods for assessing 21 Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet Chapter 3 Differences in spatial pattern of Cercospora leaf spot of sugar 37 beet in fields high and low in disease severity Chapter 4 The contribution of within-row neighbouring plants to temporal 63 increase of Cercospora leaf spot on individual sugar beet plants Chapter 5 Vertical profiles of Cercospora leaf spot on individual sugar 75 beet plants and the relative contribution of different leaf layers to disease increase Section II The life cycle of Cercospora beticola Chapter 6 Possible root infection of Cercospora beticola in sugar beet 95 Chapter 7 Root infection of sugar beet by Cercospora beticola in a 103 climate room and in the field Chapter 8 Cercospora beticola: genetic variability, identification and detection 121 Section III Disease management Chapter 9 Supervised control of Cercospora leaf spot in sugar beet 149 Chapter 10 General Discussion 175 Samenvatting 189 List of publications 193 Curriculum vitae 195 Nawoord 197 1 General Introduction Chapter 1 The sugar beet The first explicit references to beet were made in two comedies, ‘The Acharneans’ and ‘Peace’, written by the Greek poet Aristophanes and performed in Athens around 420 BC (Winner, 1993). Since the first century BC different varieties of the beet plant were already being cultivated on the shores of the Mediterranean (De Rougemont, 1989). They were grown mainly for their leaves, and probably resembled spinach or Swiss chard. In both the Greek and, later, the Roman civilisations they were highly valued supplements to the ordinary diet. References from the Middle Ages, when beet passed from areas dominated by the Romans into the cultural circles of Northern Europe, do not always differentiate clearly between roots of Brassica and Beta plants, so it is difficult to be certain where beet was known or grown regularly (Winner, 1993). Figure 1.1 Beet plant (here illustrated in its reproductive stage with seed-bearing shoot) as it was cultivated in gardens and for feeding purposes at the end of the sixteenth century in many parts of France. In this variety the upper part of the root is already of considerable thickness, and the base of the stunted shoot is red-coloured (after Dalechamps, 1587 and Winner, 1993). By the end of the fifteenth century beet was probably grown all over Europe (Deerr, 1950) but did not resemble the sugar beet as we know today (Figure 1.1). It was not until the seventeenth century that beet was cultivated regularly in the field, making it a relatively recent crop in the history of European agriculture. The development of beet into an industrial crop grown for sugar did not start until the second half of the eighteenth century (Winner, 1993). In 1747, the pharmacist Marggraf found that the sweet substance in beets 2 General Introduction was sucrose and efforts to extract sugar from beets began. Because of the very low sugar content of the beet he devoted himself to other fields of research. It was his student, Achard, who investigated the beet root in more detail and opened the way towards industrial sugar production from the roots. Sugar beet, Beta vulgaris L. spp. vulgaris (Tranzschel, 1927), is a biennial plant, a member of the Chenopodiaceae, and like many others in the family is a halophyte (able to grow on saline soils) (Elliot and Weston, 1993). It is a highly variable species containing four main groups of agricultural significance: leaf beet (Swiss chard), garden beet (beetroot), fodder beet (including mangolds) and sugar beet (Elliot and Weston, 1993). Since its origin in central Europe in the early part of the nineteenth century, the sugar beet crop has spread around the world, and it is now grown in all of the populated continents except Australia (Figure 1.2). It is essentially a crop of temperate regions, the great majority being grown between 30° and 60°N (e.g. from Cairo to Helsinki) in Europe, Asia, North America and North Africa, with a relatively small amount grown in South America (Chile and Uruguay) (Cooke and Scott, 1993). Figure 1.2 Regional distribution of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) growing areas (black filled ovals) (after F.O. Licht’s Weltkarte der Zuckerindustrie) and distribution of Cercospora beticola, not only on sugar beet but also on other hosts as mangold, spinach and Beta maritima (black lines) (after Bleiholder and Weltzien, 1972 and Anonymous, 1969). Sugar beet is one of two crops, the other being sugar cane, which constitute the only important sources of sucrose, a product with sweetening and preserving properties that make it a major component of, or additive to, a vast range of foods, beverages and 3 Chapter 1 pharmaceuticals (Cooke and Scott, 1993). However, sucrose is used in the manufacture of a range of potentially high-volume products (e.g. polyurethane foams) and high-value, low- volume products (e.g. high intensity sweeteners, vitamins and antibiotics) (Cooke and Scott, 1993). By-products of the crop (tops, pulp, fibre and molasses) are extensively used as animal feeds and, to a small degree, in human dietary fibre. Molasses are also used for alcohol production and in other forms of fermentation (e.g. penicillin production), which is in great contrast to sugar cane, where the principal by-product (bagasse) is used simply as a fuel in the factory. 12 160 140 10 xx 120 xx 8 100 6 80 ight (ton/ha) e 60 4 40 Acreage (hax1000) Sugar w 2 20 0 0 49 53 57 61 65 69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 9 9 9 19 19 19 1 19 19 19 1 19 19 19 1 19 20 Year Figure 1.3 Development of sugar beet acreage and sugar yield in The Netherlands in the period 1947 – 2003.
Recommended publications
  • Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora Arachidicola and Cercosporidium Personatum in Peanut
    Monocyclic Components for Evaluating Disease Resistance to Cercospora arachidicola and Cercosporidium personatum in Peanut by Limin Gong A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 6, 2016 Keywords: monocyclic components, disease resistance Copyright 2016 by Limin Gong Approved by Kira L. Bowen, Chair, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Charles Y. Chen, Associate Professor of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences John F. Murphy, Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology Jeffrey J. Coleman, Assisstant Professor of Entomology and Plant Pathology ABSTRACT Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an economically important crop that is produced in the United States and throughout the world. However, there are two major fungal pathogens of cultivated peanuts, and they each contribute to substantial yield losses of 50% or greater. The pathogens of these diseases are Cercospora arachidicola which causes early leaf spot (ELS), and Cercosporidium personatum which causes late leaf spot (LLS). While fungicide treatments are fairly effective for leaf spot management, disease resistance is still the best strategy. Therefore, it is important to evaluate and compare different genotypes for their disease resistance levels. The overall goal of this study was to determine resistance levels of different peanut genotypes to ELS and LLS. The peanut genotypes (Chit P7, C1001, Exp27-1516, Flavor Runner 458, PI 268868, and GA-12Y) used in this study include two genetically modified lines (Chit P7 and C1001) that over-expresses a chitinase gene. This overall goal was addressed with three specific objectives: 1) determine suitable conditions for pathogen culture and spore production in vitro; 2) determine suitable conditions for establishing infection in the greenhouse; 3) compare ELS and LLS disease reactions of young plants to those of older plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression Analysis of the Expanded Cercosporin Gene Cluster In
    EXPRESSION ANALYSIS OF THE EXPANDED CERCOSPORIN GENE CLUSTER IN CERCOSPORA BETICOLA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Karina Anne Stott In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Plant Pathology May 2018 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title Expression Analysis of the Expanded Cercosporin Gene Cluster in Cercospora beticola By Karina Anne Stott The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. Gary Secor Chair Dr. Melvin Bolton Dr. Zhaohui Liu Dr. Stuart Haring Approved: 5-18-18 Dr. Jack Rasmussen Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Cercospora leaf spot is an economically devastating disease of sugar beet caused by the fungus Cercospora beticola. It has been demonstrated recently that the C. beticola CTB cluster is larger than previously recognized and includes novel genes involved in cercosporin biosynthesis and a partial duplication of the CTB cluster. Several genes in the C. nicotianae CTB cluster are known to be regulated by ‘feedback’ transcriptional inhibition. Expression analysis was conducted in wild type (WT) and CTB mutant backgrounds to determine if feedback inhibition occurs in C. beticola. My research showed that the transcription factor CTB8 which regulates the CTB cluster expression in C. nicotianae also regulates gene expression in the C. beticola CTB cluster. Expression analysis has shown that feedback inhibition occurs within some of the expanded CTB cluster genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Fungi- SBT 302 Mycology
    MYCOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SCIENCES DR. STANLEY KIMARU 2019 NOMENCLATURE-BINOMIAL SYSTEM OF NOMENCLATURE, RULES OF NOMENCLATURE, CLASSIFICATION OF FUNGI. KEY TO DIVISIONS AND SUB-DIVISIONS Taxonomy and Nomenclature Nomenclature is the naming of organisms. Both classification and nomenclature are governed by International code of Botanical Nomenclature, in order to devise stable methods of naming various taxa, As per binomial nomenclature, genus and species represent the name of an organism. Binomials when written should be underlined or italicized when printed. First letter of the genus should be capital and is commonly a noun, while species is often an adjective. An example for binomial can be cited as: Kingdom = Fungi Division = Eumycota Subdivision = Basidiomycotina Class = Teliomycetes Order = Uredinales Family = Pucciniaceae Genus = Puccinia Species = graminis Classification of Fungi An outline of classification (G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman, The Fungi Vol. IV-B, 1973) Key to divisions of Mycota Plasmodium or pseudoplasmodium present. MYXOMYCOTA Plasmodium or pseudoplasmodium absent, Assimilative phase filamentous. EUMYCOTA MYXOMYCOTA Class: Plasmodiophoromycetes 1. Plasmodiophorales Plasmodiophoraceae Plasmodiophora, Spongospora, Polymyxa Key to sub divisions of Eumycota Motile cells (zoospores) present, … MASTIGOMYCOTINA Sexual spores typically oospores Motile cells absent Perfect (sexual) state present as Zygospores… ZYGOMYCOTINA Ascospores… ASCOMYCOTINA Basidiospores… BASIDIOMYCOTINA Perfect (sexual) state
    [Show full text]
  • Early Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Nothopassalora Personata in Spore Trap Samples from Peanut Fields Using Quantitative PCR
    plants Article Early Detection of Airborne Inoculum of Nothopassalora personata in Spore Trap Samples from Peanut Fields Using Quantitative PCR Misbakhul Munir 1, Hehe Wang 1, Nicholas S. Dufault 2 and Daniel J. Anco 1,* 1 Department of Plant and Environment Science, Clemson University, Edisto Research and Education Center, Blackville, SC 29817, USA; [email protected] (M.M.); [email protected] (H.W.) 2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; nsdufault@ufl.edu * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 7 October 2020; Published: 9 October 2020 Abstract: A quantitative PCR (qPCR)-assay was developed to detect airborne inoculum of Nothopassalora personata, causal agent of late leaf spot (LLS) on peanut, collected with a modified impaction spore trap. The qPCR assay was able to consistently detect as few as 10 spores with purified DNA and 25 spores based on crude DNA extraction from rods. In 2019, two spore traps were placed in two peanut fields with a history of LLS. Sampling units were replaced every 2 to 4 days and tested with the developed qPCR assay, while plots were monitored for symptom development. The system detected inoculum 35 to 56 days before visual symptoms developed in the field, with detection related to environmental parameters affecting pathogen life-cycle and disease development. This study develops the framework of the qPCR spore trap system and represents the initial steps towards validation of the performance of the system for use as a decision support tool to complement integrated management of LLS. Keywords: specific primers; Cercosporidium personatum; spore collection; Arachis hypogaea 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Phytoalexin Response of Arachis Hypogaea L
    INVESTIGATION OF THE PHYTOALEXIN RESPONSE OF ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L. AND ITS POSSIBLE INVOLVEMENT IN RESISTANCE TO FOLIAR PATHOGENS by CHRISTINE EDWARDS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON Submitted to the University of London for PhD ProQuest Number: 10018700 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10018700 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Dedicated to my parents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Richard Strange for his patience and support. I would also like to thank Annette Slade, Dr. Graham Wallace and Dr. Ivor Lewis for mass spectrometry in various forms. I am grateful to Chris Brierly for tending the groundnuts at Nuffield Lodge gardens. Many thanks to my friends for their encouragement and tolerance. il TITLE: Investigation of the phytoalexin response of Arachis hypogaea L. and its possible Involvement In resistance to foliar pathogens. Natural infection of groundnut foliage with Cercospora arachidicola and Phoma arachidicola resulted in the accumulation of at least six antifungal compounds. The dominant antifungal compound was the pterocarpan medicarpin. Abiotic agents including ultra-violet irradiation, salts of heavy metals and detergents were used to elicit medicarpin and other antifungal compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genomics of Cercospora Beticola Dissertation
    Population Genomics of Cercospora beticola Dissertation In fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of “Dr. rer. nat” of the Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the Christian Albrechts University of Kiel. Submitted by Lizel Potgieter March 2021 1 First examiner: Prof. Dr. rer. nat Eva Holtgrewe Stukenbrock Second examiner: Prof. Dr. rer. Nat. Tal Dagan Third Examiner: Prof. Dr. Irene Barnes Date of oral examination: 13th of April 2021 2 Table of Contents Summary...............................................................................................................................................5 Zusammenfassung................................................................................................................................8 General Introduction...........................................................................................................................12 Introduction....................................................................................................................................12 Domestication Processes Affecting Fungal Pathogen Evolution...................................................13 Evolutionary Theory on the Effect of Domestication on Fungal Pathogens.................................17 Plant-Pathogen Interactions During Infection...............................................................................19 Genome Evolution in Fungal Plant Pathogens..............................................................................21 Description of Model System........................................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenicity, Host Response and Control of Cercospora Leaf-Spot Of
    December, 1933 Research Bulletin No. 168 Pathogenicity, Host Response and Control of Cercospora Leaf,Spot of Sugar Beets By EDGAR F. VESTAL AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IOWA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND MECHANIC ARTS R. E. BUCHANAN, Director BOTANY AND PLANT PATHOLOGY SECTION AMES, IOWA CONTENTS Page Summary " 43 Growth habits and sporulation of Cercospom beticola on arti- ficial media 45 Development of conidia and conidiophores 46 Germination of conidia on the leaves of a living plant 47 The influence of changing humidity upon penetration of stomata by Cercospora mycelia 48 Infection trials on sugar beet seedlings 49 The host range of Cercospora beticola 50 Inoculation experiments with Cercospom beticola 51 Beta vulgaris inoculations with Cercospom beticola 51 Results of cross inoculations " 56 Cet"cospom beticola found in the field 57 Control of Cercospora leaf-spot 61 Spraying and dusting for Cercospora leaf-spot 61 Spraying and dusting in 1929 62 Spraying and dusting in 1930 63 The influence of spacing upon the development of Cer- cospora leaf-spot 64 Field trial in 1931 " 65 Artificial inoculation 66 Development of Cercospora leaf-spot in the drilled and checked beets 66 Comparison of environmental factors 69 Literature cited 70 SUMMARY On artificial media conidia of Ce?'COSP01"a beticola began to appear in 12 to 20 hours after inoculation, and the optimum production was from 48 to 96 hours after transfer, Germination of the conidium may take place at any point, but more often near a septum and from the basal end of the cell first. Germination of the conidia did not take place on the living leaf in an atmosphere containing less than 90 percent humidity.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugarbeet Leaf Spot Disease (Cercospora Beticola Sacc.)†
    MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY (2004) 5(3), 157–166 DOI: 10.1111/J.1364-3703.2004.00218.X PBlackwellathogen Publishing, Ltd. profile Sugarbeet leaf spot disease (Cercospora beticola Sacc.)† JOHN WEILAND1,* AND GEORG KOCH2 1United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, ND 58105, USA 2Strube-Dieckmann, A. Dieckmann-Heimburg, Postfach 1165, 31684 Nienstädt, Germany Control: Fungicides in the benzimidazole and triazole class as SUMMARY well as organotin derivatives and strobilurins have successfully been Leaf spot disease caused by Cercospora beticola Sacc. is the most used to control Cercospora leaf spot. Elevated levels of tolerance destructive foliar pathogen of sugarbeet worldwide. In addition in populations of C. beticola to some of the chemicals registered to reducing yield and quality of sugarbeet, the control of leaf spot for control has been documented. Partial genetic resistance also disease by extensive fungicide application incurs added costs is used to reduce leaf spot disease. to producers and repeatedly has selected for fungicide-tolerant C. beticola strains. The genetics and biochemistry of virulence have been examined less for C. beticola as compared with the related fungi C. nicotianae, C. kikuchii and C. zeae-maydis, fungi to which INTRODUCTION the physiology of C. beticola is often compared. C. beticola popu- Sucrose from sugarbeet is an important dietary supplement world- lations generally are not characterized as having race structure, wide. With production at ∼35 000 000 tonnes in 2002, just less than although a case of race-specific resistance in sugarbeet to C. beticola one-third of world sucrose supplies are derived from sugarbeet has been reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella Based on the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region of Ribosomal DNA
    Ecology and Population Biology Phylogenetic Analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella Based on the Internal Transcribed Spacer Region of Ribosomal DNA Stephen B. Goodwin, Larry D. Dunkle, and Victoria L. Zismann Crop Production and Pest Control Research, U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, 1155 Lilly Hall, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907. Current address of V. L. Zismann: The Institute for Genomic Research, 9712 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850. Accepted for publication 26 March 2001. ABSTRACT Goodwin, S. B., Dunkle, L. D., and Zismann, V. L. 2001. Phylogenetic main Cercospora cluster. Only species within the Cercospora cluster analysis of Cercospora and Mycosphaerella based on the internal produced the toxin cercosporin, suggesting that the ability to produce this transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 91:648- compound had a single evolutionary origin. Intraspecific variation for 658. 25 taxa in the Mycosphaerella clade averaged 1.7 nucleotides (nts) in the ITS region. Thus, isolates with ITS sequences that differ by two or more Most of the 3,000 named species in the genus Cercospora have no nucleotides may be distinct species. ITS sequences of groups I and II of known sexual stage, although a Mycosphaerella teleomorph has been the gray leaf spot pathogen Cercospora zeae-maydis differed by 7 nts and identified for a few. Mycosphaerella is an extremely large and important clearly represent different species. There were 6.5 nt differences on genus of plant pathogens, with more than 1,800 named species and at average between the ITS sequences of the sorghum pathogen Cercospora least 43 associated anamorph genera.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation
    FIELD EFFICACY OF QUINONE OUTSIDE INHIBITOR AND DEMETHYLATION INHIBITOR FUNGICIDES ON PEANUT FOLIAR DISEASES IN FLORIDA By WAEL M. ELWAKIL A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Wael M. Elwakil To my Mom ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my family for their emotional support and encouragement during this journey of pursuing my master’s. I owe a great debt of gratitude to my masters and doctorate advisor Dr. Nicholas S. Dufault of the Plant Pathology Department at the University of Florida for his continuous support, advice, and mentoring. Dr. Dufault is undeniably one of the most respectable and generous people that I have ever encountered in my life. I would like also to acknowledge Mrs. Kristin Beckham for her help during the various steps of this project. I also thank Dr. Rebecca Barocco for assisting with the field trials setup, maintenance, and disease ratings. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. 4 LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................ 7 LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................. 9 ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Approaches to Detect and Control Cercospora Kikuchii In
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2012 Molecular Approaches to Detect and Control Cercospora kikuchii in Soybeans Ashok Kumar Chanda Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Chanda, Ashok Kumar, "Molecular Approaches to Detect and Control Cercospora kikuchii in Soybeans" (2012). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3002. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3002 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. MOLECULAR APPROACHES TO DETECT AND CONTROL CERCOSPORA KIKUCHII IN SOYBEANS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology by Ashok Kumar Chanda B.S., Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, 2001 M.S., Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, 2004 August 2012 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my Dear Mother, PADMAVATHI Dear Father, MADHAVA RAO Sweet Wife, MALA Little Angel, HAMSINI ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisors Dr. Zhi-Yuan Chen and Dr. Raymond Schneider, for giving me the opportunity to pursue this doctoral program, valuable guidance throughout my research as well as freedom to choose my work, kindness and constant encouragement, and teaching me how to become a molecular plant pathologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Characterization of Cercospora Beticola Necrosis-Inducing Effector Cbnip1
    Received: 27 September 2020 | Revised: 8 November 2020 | Accepted: 9 November 2020 DOI: 10.1111/mpp.13026 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Identification and characterization of Cercospora beticola necrosis-inducing effector CbNip1 Malaika K. Ebert 1,2,3 | Lorena I. Rangel 1 | Rebecca E. Spanner 1,2 | Demetris Taliadoros4,5 | Xiaoyun Wang1 | Timothy L. Friesen 1,2 | Ronnie de Jonge 6,7,8 | Jonathan D. Neubauer1 | Gary A. Secor 2 | Bart P. H. J. Thomma 3,9 | Eva H. Stukenbrock 4,5 | Melvin D. Bolton 1,2 1Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Abstract Fargo, North Dakota, USA Cercospora beticola is a hemibiotrophic fungus that causes cercospora leaf spot 2 Department of Plant Pathology, North disease of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). After an initial symptomless biotrophic phase Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA of colonization, necrotic lesions appear on host leaves as the fungus switches to a 3Laboratory of Phytopathology, Wageningen necrotrophic lifestyle. The phytotoxic secondary metabolite cercosporin has been University, Wageningen, Netherlands shown to facilitate fungal virulence for several Cercospora spp. However, because 4Environmental Genomics Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, cercosporin production and subsequent cercosporin-initiated formation of reactive Plön, Germany oxygen species is light-dependent, cell death evocation by this toxin is only fully en- 5Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, sured during a period of light. Here, we report the discovery of the effector protein Germany 6Plant-Microbe Interactions, Department CbNip1 secreted by C. beticola that causes enhanced necrosis in the absence of light of Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, and, therefore, may complement light-dependent necrosis formation by cercosporin.
    [Show full text]