DOCSLIB.ORG

Hon John Mickel Mp Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hon John Mickel Mp Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Queensland HON JOHN MICKEL MP SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND 27 January 2011 (Premier and Ministers) f Dear Premier I Minister I write regarding recent recommendations made by the Committee System Review Committee. As you are aware, late last year the committee's report was published. At the time, I publicly supported the overall thrust of the committee's recommendations. However, I did express serious concern in relation to two of the committee's recommendations, and in particular to Recommendation 12 proposing that "responsibility for the management of construction and maintenance of the Parliamentary bUildings and electorate offices (along with the relevant bUdget) be transferred to the Department of Public Works". If adopted, this recommendation would have significant implications for the management of the Parliament, for all Members, and for the Parliamentary Service (including electorate office staff). I have already written to the Premier outlining my concerns with regard to Recommendations 12 and 13. With regard to Recommendation 13, I believe it is totally unacceptable that the Speaker would be excluded from the proposed Committee of the Legislative Assembly and thus from the formulation of Standing Orders and from the consideration of a range of other significant management issues. With regard to Recommendation 12, I feel so strongly about what is proposed that I have decided to write to all Ministers, both to provide relevant factual information and to respond to some of the comments that have been made. In short, my concems relate to the following: • the committee's recommendation is not supported by any evidence or justification; • there is a real risk that the committee has acted on information that is misleading or incorrect, given that there was no opportunity to address this matter to the committee because it was not in its terms of reference and could not be reasonably foreshadowed; • the current arrangements provide a clear demarcation between the executive and the Parliament and a clear position of authority and accountability (I.e., the Speaker); and • an independent Parliamentary Service is an integral part of an effective Parliamentary democracy. I believe that the current model for managing the precinct and electorate officers should be maintained for the following reasons: 2 • it provides a single independent authority to set priorities for work, i.e., the Speaker, based on the advice of the Parliamentary Service. with appropriate consultation with the all-party Speaker's Advisory Committee; • it allows the exercise of efficiency and effectiveness controls over contractors including the Department of Public Works; • it allows a single point of contact for the coordination of service delivery under the direct control of the Speaker to advance the interests of the Parliament and its Members; • it provides on-site 24/7 service to Members on the precinct; • it provides a consistent approach to the management of electorate offices; and • it ensures a responsive and high quality service to Members. What is proposed is akin to a "shared services model", Such models are often not very successful, particularly because there is a blurring of responsibility. The reality is that there can never be an unlimited amount of funds to be spent on the maintenance, development and improvement of the parliamentary buildings. When all the facts are considered, it becomes clear that the precinct and electorate offices have been managed well given the competing demands for work and available funding. I believe it is important that all Ministers take the time to carefully consider all of the facts along with the implications of what is being proposed by the Committee. To assist in this process, I have prepared a detailed assessment regarding Recommendation 12 and related issues for your consideration. Additionally, I enclose a copy of a letter and accompanying commentary by Integrity Commissioner Dr David Solomon with regard to the report of the committee. I draw to Ministers' attention Dr Solomon's comments in respect of Recommendation 12 and also regarding the exclusion of the Speaker from the proposed Committee of the Legislative Assembly. While I appreciate that many Ministers are busy with important flood recovery matters within their portfolios and electorates, I urge you to read the attached material and discuss it with your colleagues before any further decision is taken in relation to the proposed moves. Yours sincerely HON JOHN MICKEL MP Speaker Queensland Integrity Commissioner 10 January 2011 Han RJ Mickel Speaker, Queensland Parliament Parliament House Alice and George Streets BRISI3ANE QLD 4000 Dear Mr Speaker, I enclose a copy ofa commentary I have prepared about some ofthe major issues raised in the report by the Parliamentary Committee System Review Committee, concerning its review ofthe Queensland Parliamentary Committee System. In particular Isuggest the retention of the Scrutiny of Legislation Committee, the Standing Orders Committee and the Integrity, Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee. I also suggest that the number ofportfolio-based committees be reduced from nine (as recommended by the Committee) to six, and that one of those committees should absorb the present responsibilities and role ofthe Public Accounts and Public Works Committee. There are several other matters that I discuss. I am sendingcopies to the Premier, the Clerk of the House, the Chair of the Integrity, Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee, the Chair ofthe Committee System Review Committee, the members ofthe (unofficial) Integrity Committee and the Director-General of the Department ofthe Premier and Cabinet. Dr David Solomon AM Queensland Integrity Commissionel' {eveI1), S·~ Alber! Street Brisbane PO ~ox 'S1.9(1, tity ttl."1 Qltl'()l1slonu /jOOl AIISlfiJ!ia Phone +61 17 ].22fj 2351 foOl" 161 73'-'413'6 Website Nww.lnteglity.qld.goV.illl Commentary by the Qneensland Integrity Commissioner on the report by the Committee System Review Committee On 16 September 2009. [made a submission in response to the Government's green paper on Integrity and Accountability in Queensland. In the course of that submission I suggested that it was desirable that the Government should revisit the proposals in the review in 1992 by the Electoral and Administrative Review Commission ofParliamentary Committees. "In pal1icular," I wrote, "it is important in a unicameral Parliament that most legislation should be considercd (aftcr an initial review by the Scrutiny ofLcgislation Committee) by committees organised according to public policy groupings." I then quoted the primary recommendation that EARC made along similar liues and pointed out it was the system that operated velY effectively in New Zealand. I concluded that "Adopting such a system wOllld contribute... significantly to real accountability and the public's perception of accountability... I consider this reform would make a major difference to the way the Parliament is judged by many Qneenslanders." The Government subsequently decided that a new Parlimnenta'Y Committee, the Committee System Review Committee (refelTed to here as "the Committee") should be established to conduct a comprehensive review ofthe Queenslaud Parliamentmy Committee System. This was established by . resolution ofthe Legislative Assembly in February 2010. I was one of33 people who made a submission to the Committee. The Committee presented its repol1 in December 20 IO. I wish to comment on a number of matters that arise in the report. In doing so I find it very gratifying that the Committee has essentially adopted the substance ofthe original recommendations of the Electoral and Administrative Review Commission of which I was Chairman in 1992-3. Those recommeudations had been largely rejected by the Parliamentary Committee for Electoral and Administrative Review (PCEAR) and by the then Government. Technical scrutiny of bills Recommendations 6 and 7 of the Committee rep0l1 propose that nine portfolio committees that it is proposing should take over, within their p0l1folio responsibilities, the functions currently performed by the Scrutiny of Legislation Committee in considering the application of the fundamental legislative principles and subordinate legislation. There appears to be no explanation for this proposal in the Committee's report, or justification offered for the abolition of the Scrntiny ofLegislation Committee. EARC first proposed the establishment ofthe Scrutiny of Legislation Committee in its 1991 rep0l10n Rel'iew ofIhe Office ofParliall/elllat}' COllI/sci. Its recommendation was supportcd by PCEAR but not adopted by the Government. In 1992, in its report on Review ofPal'liall/ell{w}' COllllllillees, EARC renewed its recommendation.' It did so while at the same time recommending the creation of five I Electoral and Administrative Review Commission (EARe), Report on Review ofParliamentary Committees, October 1992, Report No. 92/R4, p. 94. 1 standing committees with powers to inquire into and report on any aspect ofpublic administration in Queensland.2 These committees were also intcnded to act as estimates committees as well as reviewing all new or amending legislation within their respective areas ofrcsponsibility - the roles aud fnnctions the Committee proposes for its nine "portfolio based committees". In a recent al1icle, Techllical SCi'll/iII)' ofBills ill Nell' Zealalld', Tim Workman, Clerk-Assistant (Legal Services) in the Parliament ofNew Zealand, says "Ofthe Australian scrutiny
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paper Presented by the Hon. Peter Wellington MP
    UI1SFTJEJOH0⒏DFST`$MFSLT` $POGFSFODF 4ZEOFZ +VMZ l4USJLJOHUIF#BMBODF*NQBSUJBMJUZBOE SFQSFTFOUBUJPOJOUIF2VFFOTMBOEQBSMJBNFOUz 1BQFSCZ)PO1FUFS8FMMJOHUPO.1 4QFBLFSPGUIF-FHJTMBUJWF"TTFNCMZ 2VFFOTMBOE1BSMJBNFOU This aim of this paper is to describe the ways in which the Speakership of the Queensland Parliament currently operates, to consider the ways in which this differs from the traditional Westminster style Parliament and indeed from previous Queensland Parliaments, and to reflect on the particular demands placed on the Speakers of small Parliaments. The Parliamentary Speaker and tradition The tradition of Speakership in the Westminster parliamentary system is a long and enduring one, commencing with the appointment of the first British Speaker, Sir Thomas Hungerford, who was appointed in 1377. From these earliest times, the Speaker has been the mouthpiece or representative of the House, speaking on behalf of the House in communicating its deliberations and decisions, to the monarchy, the Executive and also others. The Speaker represents, in a very real sense, the right of freedom of speech in the Parliament, which was hard won from a monarchical Executive centuries ago. The Parliament must constantly be prepared to maintain its right of…freedom of speech, without fear or favour.1 Amongst the numerous powers, responsibilities and functions vested in Speakers via the constitution, standing orders and conventions, and in addition to being the spokesperson of the House, the main functions of the Speaker are to preside over the debates of the
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Cameron Dick
    Speech by Hon. Cameron Dick MEMBER FOR GREENSLOPES Hansard Wednesday, 22 April 2009 MAIDEN SPEECH Hon. CR DICK (Greenslopes—ALP) (Attorney-General and Minister for Industrial Relations) (7.30 pm): I start tonight by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land where this parliament stands who have served and nurtured this land for centuries. I pay tribute to them and their great role in our history. It is in this reflection of history that I begin tonight. In December 1862, three short years after the birth of our great state, whose 150th anniversary we celebrate this year, the sailing ship Conway arrived in the small Queensland settlement then known as Moreton Bay. History little records the fate of the Conway, its passengers and its crew, but one thing is known about that day in December 1862: that is the day my family arrived in Queensland and began its Queensland journey. Almost 150 years later, that journey has taken me to this place, the Queensland parliament. I stand tonight as a representative of the people in our state’s legislature, not only as a fifth-generation Queenslander but also with great humility and honour as a son of the state seat of Greenslopes, the electorate I now serve as a member of parliament. My first thanks this evening go to those people who make up the community of Greenslopes. It is a wonderful and diverse community and I look forward to serving them to the best of my ability. This electorate is very dear to my heart. It was at Holland Park, in the Greenslopes electorate, that I was raised as a boy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Bruce Flegg MP
    Queensland Government Hon Stephen Robertson MP Member for Stretton Ref [M0/10/4103] Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade The Honourable John Mickel MP 17 SEP 2010 Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Mr Speaker Remainder incurpnrateii IN Icace.#. I refer you to the second reading of the. La September 2010. I believe that Dr Bruce Flegg MP, Member for Moggill and Michael Crandon MP, Member for Coomera are in breach of standing order 260 which relates to the declaration of pecuniary interest in debate and other proceedings. As indicated in the Register of Member's Interests, both members hold substantial property holdings which has land tax implications and therefore means they had a direct and material interest in speaking against the bill and of how it passed. In speaking against the bill, the members did not declare their interests at the beginning of their speech as required under section (1) of standing order 260. I would appreciate your investigation of this matter and your advice on the outcome of your deliberations. Should you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact Mr Lance McCallum, Acting Principal Advisor on telephone 3225 1861. Yours sincerely STEPHEN ROBERTSON MP Level 17 61 Mary Street Brisbane Qld 4000 PO Box 15216 City East Queensland 4002 Australia Telephone +617 3225 1861 Facsimilie +617 3225 1828 Email [email protected] HON JOHN MICKEL MP SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND 2 4 SEP 2010 Hon Stephen Robertson MP Minister for Natural Resources , Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade PO Box 15216 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Dear Minister I acknowledge your correspondence dated 17 September 2010, relating to Dr Bruce Flegg MP, Member for Moggill and Mr Michael Crandon MP, Member for Coomera speaking to the second reading of the Land Valuation Bill 2010 on 16 September 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Volume of Additional Information
    Legal Affairs, Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Committee Estimates - 2011 Volume of Additional Information Contents Correspondence from the Leader of the House Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 17 June 2011. Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 24 June 2011. Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 25 July 2011. Minutes of meetings 17 June 2011 19 July 2011 19 July 2011 26 July 2011 Minister for Justice and Attorney-General Questions on notice and the Minister’s answers Documents tabled at the hearing Answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing Minister for Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Questions on notice and the Minister’s answers Documents tabled at the hearing Answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing Correspondence from the Minister dated 25 July 2011 Correspondence from the Leader of the House 17 June 2011 24 June 2011 25 July 2011 Minutes of meetings 17 June 2011 19 July 2011 19 July 2011 26 July 2011 - M I N U T E S - Minutes of a meeting of the Legal Affairs, Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Committee on Friday 17 June 2011 at 1.28pm Present: Hon Dean Wells MP (Chair) Mr John-Paul Langbroek MP (Deputy Chair) Mrs Julie Attwood MP Mr Jarrod Bleijie MP Mr Chris Foley MP Mrs Betty Kiernan MP (until 1.59pm) Apologies: In attendance: Ms Barbara Stone MP Mr Stephen Finnimore, Research Director Ms Amanda Honeyman, Principal Research Officer Hearing schedule: At the meeting, members were provided with two draft hearing schedule options, and copies of all departmental structures, statutory authorities and senior officers of the departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    Office of the Governor Annual Report 2010 - 2011 To obtain information about the content of this report, please contact: Air Commodore Mark Gower OAM (Retd) Official Secretary Office of the Governor, Queensland GPO Box 434 Brisbane Qld 4001 Telephone: (07) 3858 5700 Facsimile: (07) 3858 5701 Email: [email protected] Information about the activities of the Queensland Governor and the operations of the Office of the Governor is available at the following internet address: www.govhouse.qld.gov.au Internet annual report: www.govhouse.qld.gov.au/news_media/annual_reports.aspx Copyright and ISSN © The State of Queensland (Office of the Governor) 2011. Copyright protects this publication except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act. Reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the accountable officer. ISSN 1837 – 2775 Aim of Report The Office of the Governor Annual Report 2010–2011 is an integral part of the Office of the Governor’s corporate governance framework and describes the achievements, performance, outlook and financial position of the Office for the financial year. The Annual Report is a key accountability document and the principal way in which the Office reports on activities and provides a full and complete picture of its performance to Parliament and the wider community. The Report covers the objectives, activities and performance of the Office during the period 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 and includes information and images that illustrate the many activities which the Office undertakes to provide personal, administrative and logistic support to the Governor and manage the Government House Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Politics in a Federal Polity AJPS Submitted
    Australian Journal of Political Science For Peer Review Only Court Politics in a F ederal Polity Journal: Australian Journal of Political Science Manuscript ID: Draft Manuscript Type: Original Article Keywords: court politics, core executive, Queensland URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cajp Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 28 Australian Journal of Political Science 1 1 Court politics 2 3 4 5 COURT POLITICS IN A FEDERAL POLITY 6 7 8 9 10 11 Introduction 12 Australian political scientists have explored the core executive only episodically. Rhodes 13 14 and Wanna’sFor (2009) review Peer of the literature Review found little research on Only Australian executive politics; it 15 16 1 17 was ‘almost devoid of theory, even controversies’. Other characteristics include: the 18 19 predominance of realpolitik in accounts of executive power and a tendency to emphasise ‘practice 20 21 over theory, commentary over fieldwork, and teaching over research’ (Rhodes and Wanna 2009, 22 23 129-30). Weller (2005, 37) concurs, noting the academic literature provides ‘slim pickings for a 24 25 reader who wants to know how the executive system of government works in Australia’. The 26 27 28 challenge for Australian political scientists, therefore, is to provide theoretically informed studies of 29 2 30 the political executive based on original fieldwork. Strangio, ‘tHart and Walter (2013) also call for 31 32 a greater focus on the political executive. They exhort the next generation of scholars to pursue an 33 34 ‘integrated approach to the study of prime ministerial leadership, focusing on the interplay 35 36 between political circumstances, institutional possibilities, individual characteristics and social 37 38 39 relations at the apex of executive government’ (Strangio et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 05.01.07Combined.Pdf
    QueenslandQueensland Government Government Gazette Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 344] FRIDAY, 5 JANUARY, 2007 You Can Advertise In The ‘Gazette’! Contact your state representative regarding the placement of your UNITS START advertisement in the from $485 weekly Queensland Government Gazette... plus GST NAS, National Advertising Services QLD Marlene Ellison ph: 07 5577 9499 fax: 07 5577 9433 Horne Media NSW / ACT Jonathon Tremain ph: 02 9955 3545 fax: 02 9955 3646 VIC / TAS Harry Damoulakis ph: 03 9885 2928 fax: 03 9885 1179 SA / NT Jim Girdler ph: 08 8364 4678 fax: 08 8364 5557 WA Harold Hogan ph: 08 9470 6655 fax: 08 9470 4699 [1973] Queensland Government Gazette EXTRAORDINARY PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 343] FRIDAY, 22 DECEMBER, 2006 [No. 123 NOTICE Premier’s Office Brisbane, 21 December 2006 Her Excellency the Governor directs it to be notified that, acting under the provisions of the Constitution of Queensland 2001, she has appointed the Honourable Paul Thomas Lucas MP, Minister for Transport and Main Roads to act as, and to perform all of the functions and exercise all of the powers of, Minister for State Development, Employment and Industrial Relations from 19 January 2007 until the Honourable Reginald John Mickel MP returns to duty. PETER BEATTIE MP PREMIER AND MINISTER FOR TRADE NOTICE Premier’s Office Brisbane, 21 December 2006 Her Excellency the Governor directs it to be notified that, acting under the provisions of the Constitution of Queensland 2001, she has appointed the Honourable Rodney Jon Welford MP, Minister for Education and Training Minister for the Arts to act as, and to perform all of the functions and exercise all of the powers of, Minister for Health from 1 January 2007 until the Honourable Stephen Robertson MP returns to Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland January to June 2004
    Political Chronicles 605 Queensland January to June 2004 JOHN WANNA Political Science Program, Australian National University, and Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University A Re- Pete Landslide at the 2004 State Election Premier Peter Beattie caught the opposition completely by surprise announcing the state election on 14 January, while most Queenslanders were still on holiday. The Opposition Leader, Lawrence Springborg, working on his farm, raced back to Brisbane, while the Liberals' Leader, Bob Quinn, caught an early flight interrupting his family holiday in Sydney. Just as with the 2001 poll, Beattie's timing meant the campaign would occur over the summer break with few paying attention to politics. Beattie's repeat of a successful tactic reeked of opportunism. Beattie brought on the snap poll in an attempt to clear the air over systemic maladministration exposed in the Families Department. The department charged with protecting children had failed to act in hundreds of cases of child abuse — especially children in foster case and particularly indigenous children. The public inquiry held by the Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) in 2003 discovered a culture of cover- up in the besieged department. Even when given evidence of cases of sexual abuse it felt powerless to act and often did not forward matters to the police. The CMC produced an interim report in January 2004 citing 110 recommendations for change. Beattie admitted publicly that both his government and the department "had failed" and that he would provide funding to implement the reforms (Courier-Mail, 7 January 2004). He stated his intention of seeking a mandate to fix the foster care crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • VP 16 March 2004
    16 Mar 2004 1 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY–FIRST PARLIAMENT VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS NO. 1 – TUESDAY, 16 MARCH 2004 CONTENTS PROCLAMATION CONVENING THE PARLIAMENT ............................................................................ 2 COMMISSION TO OPEN PARLIAMENT................................................................................................ 2 COMMISSION TO ADMINISTER OATH OR AFFIRMATION................................................................. 2 RETURN OF WRIT ................................................................................................................................. 3 MEMBERS SWORN................................................................................................................................ 4 PRESIDING MEMBER ............................................................................................................................ 5 ELECTION OF SPEAKER (Hansard p. 3, 10.42 am)..................................................................................... 5 PRESENTATION OF SPEAKER ............................................................................................................ 6 SPECIAL ADJOURNMENT..................................................................................................................... 6 ADJOURNMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 6 ATTENDANCE .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 JOHN WANNA AND TRACEY ARKLAY THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/qldparliament_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Ayes Have It: History of Queensland Parliament 1957-1989 / John Wanna and Tracey Arklay ISBN: 9781921666308 (pbk.) 9781921666315 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Politics, Australian Politics History of Australian politics, Queensland Parliament History from 1957 - 1989 Other Authors/Contributors: John Wanna and Tracey Arklay All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press All images supplied by the Queensland Parliamentary Library. Printed by Griffin Press. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . .vii 1 . Inside the Queensland Parliament . 1 Part I 2 . Parliament’s refusal of supply and defeat of Labor, 1957 . 29 3 . The early Nicklin years, 1957–1963 . 57 4 . Safely in the saddle: the Nicklin government, 1963–1968 . 87 5 . The Nicklin government’s legislative program . 125 6 . The oppositional parties in the Parliament, 1957–1968 . 167 7 . The Pizzey–Chalk interlude, 1968 . 203 Part II 8 .
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Executive Control in Queensland's Unicameral Legislature
    Dr Kate Jones and Professor Scott Prasser are with the Public Policy Institute, Australian Catholic University Resisting executive control in Queensland’s unicameral legislature — recent developments and the changing role of the speaker in Queensland Kate Jones and Scott Prasser Queensland has long been criticised for the limitations of its parliamentary system and its excessive dominance by executive government. The 1989 Fitzgerald Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct (henceforth called the Fitzgerald Inquiry), pinpointed Queensland’s system of government and particularly its weak parliamentary system as one of the main causes for the State’s endemic corruption. As the Fitzgerald Report (1989: 123) lamented: Any government may use its dominance in the Parliament and its control of public resources to stifle and neuter effective criticism by the Opposition … A government can use its control of Parliament and public administration to manipulate, exploit and misinform the community, or to hide matters from it. According to Fitzgerald (1989: 123–5) debate was stifled, parliamentary sitting days too few, the Opposition restrained, question-time redundant and the committee system minimalist. Also, the Speaker of Parliament, the supposed independent chair, was perceived as too partisan, one of the prizes bestowed on party stalwarts by executive government (Fitzgerald 1989: 123). While these criticisms were legitimately aimed at Queensland’s National Party government (1983–89), they applied equally to previous Coalition (1957–1983) and Labor administrations (1915–1929; 1932–1957). Strong executive control of parliament was a Queensland tradition. Although not too different from other states, the problem was exacerbated by Queensland’s lack of an upper house — abolished by Labor in 1922 despite a referendum to the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    Australian Journal of Political Science For Peer Review Only Court Politics in a F ederal Polity Journal: Australian Journal of Political Science Manuscript ID: CAJP-2014-0109.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Article Keywords: court politics, core executive, Queensland, Bligh government URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cajp Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 31 Australian Journal of Political Science 1 1 Court politics 2 3 4 COURT POLITICS IN A FEDERAL POLITY 5 6 7 8 Introduction 9 Australian political scientists have explored the core executive only episodically. XXXX 10 11 and Wanna’s (2009) review of the literature including textbooks, journalism, biographies and 12 13 memoirs led them to conclude there was little research on Australian executive politics; it was 14 For Peer Review Only 15 16 ‘almost devoid of theory, even controversies’. Other characteristics include: the predominance of 17 18 realpolitik in accounts of executive power and a tendency to emphasise ‘practice over theory, 19 20 commentary over fieldwork, and teaching over research’ (XXXX and Wanna 2009, 129-30). 21 22 Weller (2005, 37) concurs. He notes the academic literature provides ‘slim pickings for a reader 23 24 who wants to know how the executive system of government works in Australia’. The challenge for 25 26 27 Australian political scientists, therefore, is to provide theoretically informed studies of the political 28 1 29 executive based on original fieldwork. Strangio, ‘tHart and Walter (2013) also call for a greater 30 31 focus on the political executive. They exhort the next generation of scholars to pursue an 32 33 ‘integrated approach to the study of prime ministerial leadership, focusing on the interplay 34 35 between political circumstances, institutional possibilities, individual characteristics and social 36 37 38 relations at the apex of executive government’ (Strangio et al.
    [Show full text]