Dr Bruce Flegg MP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dr Bruce Flegg MP Queensland Government Hon Stephen Robertson MP Member for Stretton Ref [M0/10/4103] Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade The Honourable John Mickel MP 17 SEP 2010 Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Parliament House George Street BRISBANE QLD 4000 Dear Mr Speaker Remainder incurpnrateii IN Icace.#. I refer you to the second reading of the. La September 2010. I believe that Dr Bruce Flegg MP, Member for Moggill and Michael Crandon MP, Member for Coomera are in breach of standing order 260 which relates to the declaration of pecuniary interest in debate and other proceedings. As indicated in the Register of Member's Interests, both members hold substantial property holdings which has land tax implications and therefore means they had a direct and material interest in speaking against the bill and of how it passed. In speaking against the bill, the members did not declare their interests at the beginning of their speech as required under section (1) of standing order 260. I would appreciate your investigation of this matter and your advice on the outcome of your deliberations. Should you have any further enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact Mr Lance McCallum, Acting Principal Advisor on telephone 3225 1861. Yours sincerely STEPHEN ROBERTSON MP Level 17 61 Mary Street Brisbane Qld 4000 PO Box 15216 City East Queensland 4002 Australia Telephone +617 3225 1861 Facsimilie +617 3225 1828 Email [email protected] HON JOHN MICKEL MP SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND 2 4 SEP 2010 Hon Stephen Robertson MP Minister for Natural Resources , Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade PO Box 15216 CITY EAST QLD 4002 Dear Minister I acknowledge your correspondence dated 17 September 2010, relating to Dr Bruce Flegg MP, Member for Moggill and Mr Michael Crandon MP, Member for Coomera speaking to the second reading of the Land Valuation Bill 2010 on 16 September 2010. In accordance with Standing Order 269(5), I will be seeking further information from both Dr Flegg and Mr Crandon prior to determining whether to refer the matter to the Integrity, Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee. Should you have any queries regarding this matter, or require further information, please contact Joe Begley (email: Joe. Begley(a.parliarnent.gld.gov.au; telephone: 3406 7170). Yours sincerely JOHN ICKEL MP eaker Parliament House, George Street, Brisbane, 4000 Phone: (07) 3406 7374 + Fax: (07) 3406 7308 ♦ E-mail: [email protected] 4 Website: www.uarliame.nt.glcl.eov.au HON JOHN MICKEL MP SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND 2 4 SEP 2010 Dr Bruce Flegg MP Member for Moggill PO Box 328 KENMORE QLD 4069 Dear Dr Flegg I have received correspondence dated 17 September 2010 from Hon Stephen Robertson MP, Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade, relating to the second reading debate of the Land Valuation Bill 2010 on 16 September 2010. Standing Order 269(5), allows that in relation to the procedures for raising and considering complaints, the Speaker may request information from the member the subject of the complaint. Accordingly, I am seeking further information from you, regarding this complaint, prior to determining whether or not to refer the matter to the Integrity, Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee (IEPPC). In connection with this matter, I enclose a copy of the Minister's letter. To assist me in determining whether or not to refer the matter to the IEPPC, I invite you to provide a written submission providing any evidence or information which you believe is relevant to this matter. Should you have any queries regarding this matter, or require further information, please contact Joe Begley (email: Joe.Begley(^parliament.gld.gov.au; telephone: 3406 7170). Yours sincerely N JOH MICKEL MP Parliament House, George Street, Brisbane, 4000 Phone: (07) 3406 7374 ♦ Fax: (07) 3406 7308 ♦ E-mail: si)eiker@i)ai-li,,iiiie.i-Lt.cit(l.gov.qti ♦ Website: v, v,,.parliament.gld.eov.ati HON JOHN MICKEL MP SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND 2 h SEP 2010 Mr Michael Crandon MP Member for Coomera PO Box 80 OXENFORD QLD 4210 Dear Mr Crandon I have received correspondence dated 17 September 2010 from Hon Stephen Robertson MP, Minister for Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and Minister for Trade, relating to the second reading debate of the Land Valuation Bill 2010 on 16 September 2010. Standing Order 269(5), allows that in relation to the procedures for raising and considering complaints, the Speaker may request information from the member the subject of the complaint. Accordingly, I am seeking further information from you, regarding this complaint, prior to determining whether or not to refer the matter to the Integrity, Ethics and Parliamentary Privileges Committee (IEPPC). In connection with this matter, I enclose a copy of the Minister's letter. To assist me in determining whether or not to refer the matter to the IEPPC, I invite you to provide a written submission providing any, evidence or information which you believe is relevant to this matter. Should you have any queries regarding this matter, or require further information, please contact Joe Begley (email: Joe.Begley(a-)parliament.gld.gov.au; telephone: 3406 7170). Yours sincerely Parliament House, George Street, Brisbane, 4000 Phone: (07) 3406 7374 ♦ Fax: (07) 3406 7308 ♦ E-mail: speakerBu.>arliament.gld.gov.au ♦ Website: wti^v.parliament.gld.eov.au The Honourable John Mickel MP Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Queensland Parliament House George Street Brisbane 4000 05/10/2010 Dear Mr Speaker I refer to your letter dated the 24t" of September 2010, in which you refer to correspondence from Hon Stephen Roberts MP. In response, I refer you to my statement of today, in the house. I also refer you to the MEPPC information paper on Standing Order 260, a copy of which is attached, which makes it clear that my interests are interests in common that do not require disclosure. Michael Crandon MP Member for Coomera (07) 5514 0483 (07) 5514 0634 1800 224 650 coomera (a7parliament.gld.gov.au 11 www.crandon4coomera .com.au PO Box 80 OXENFORD QLD 4210 Unit 20 Hope Island Central 340 Hope Island Road, Hope Island Standing Order 260 Standing Order 260 provides- 260. Declaration of pecuniary interest in debate and other proceedings (1) Notwithstanding compliance with any other order of the House concerning the disclosure of interests, a member shall, in respect of any question in the House or a committee, declare any pecuniary interest (of which the member is aware) (whether or not it is a matter of public policy) that the member or a related person has in the question, i such pecuniary interest is greater than the interest held in common with subjects of the Crown or members of the House generally. [Emphasis added.] (2) The declaration in (1) shall be made: (a) at the beginning of their speech if the member participates in debate on the matter in the House or a committee; (b) as soon as practicable after a division is called for on the matter in the Legislative Assembly, or a committee, if the member proposes to vote in that division. (3) The member's declaration shall be recorded and indexed in the Votes and Proceedings or minutes of proceedings of the committee and in any Hansard report of those proceedings of that division. (4) It shall not be necessary for a member to declare an interest when directing a question seeking information. Background On 8 August 2001, the Legislative Assembly adopted the above standing order, which requires members to declare any pecuniary interest they have, or a related person has, in a matter on which they intend to speak or vote (whether or not it is a matter of public policy), if the pecuniary interest in the matter is greater than the interest held in common with subjects of the Crown or members of the House generally. The standing order is based on a House of Commons standing order. Rationale for the standing order The standing order recognises that a perception could arise of members being improperly influenced in the performance of their parliamentary duties by their private interests. The standing order also recognises that members' private interests may coincide with the interests of their electorates. The standing order is designed to ensure that, where appropriate, a member's pecuniary interest in matters the subject of proceedings in the House or a committee is declared. Openness about any pecuniary interest of a member, which might reasonably be thought to be relevant to the proceedings, ensures that the public and other members are aware of any interest which might give rise to a perception of a conflict of interest between the member's private interests and their public duties. Standing Order 260 is wider than Standing Order 2591 (No member pecuniarily interested may vote) because it relates to p y pecuniary interest, not just a direct pecuniary interest. The interpretation of what constitutes a pecuniary interest is not always clear. The term "any pecuniary interest" does not appear to have been the subject of parliamentary interpretation and members are encouraged to seek individual advice from the Clerk of the Parliament if they are concerned about the application of S0260 to their particular circumstances. Standing Order 260 makes it clear that any declaration under the standing order is in addition to the registration of the interest on the Register of Members' Interests or the Register of Related Persons' Interests: S0260(1). It is not necessary for a member to declare an interest when asking a question without or on notice about a matter: S0260(4).
Recommended publications
  • Paper Presented by the Hon. Peter Wellington MP
    UI1SFTJEJOH0⒏DFST`$MFSLT` $POGFSFODF 4ZEOFZ +VMZ l4USJLJOHUIF#BMBODF*NQBSUJBMJUZBOE SFQSFTFOUBUJPOJOUIF2VFFOTMBOEQBSMJBNFOUz 1BQFSCZ)PO1FUFS8FMMJOHUPO.1 4QFBLFSPGUIF-FHJTMBUJWF"TTFNCMZ 2VFFOTMBOE1BSMJBNFOU This aim of this paper is to describe the ways in which the Speakership of the Queensland Parliament currently operates, to consider the ways in which this differs from the traditional Westminster style Parliament and indeed from previous Queensland Parliaments, and to reflect on the particular demands placed on the Speakers of small Parliaments. The Parliamentary Speaker and tradition The tradition of Speakership in the Westminster parliamentary system is a long and enduring one, commencing with the appointment of the first British Speaker, Sir Thomas Hungerford, who was appointed in 1377. From these earliest times, the Speaker has been the mouthpiece or representative of the House, speaking on behalf of the House in communicating its deliberations and decisions, to the monarchy, the Executive and also others. The Speaker represents, in a very real sense, the right of freedom of speech in the Parliament, which was hard won from a monarchical Executive centuries ago. The Parliament must constantly be prepared to maintain its right of…freedom of speech, without fear or favour.1 Amongst the numerous powers, responsibilities and functions vested in Speakers via the constitution, standing orders and conventions, and in addition to being the spokesperson of the House, the main functions of the Speaker are to preside over the debates of the
    [Show full text]
  • Hon. Cameron Dick
    Speech by Hon. Cameron Dick MEMBER FOR GREENSLOPES Hansard Wednesday, 22 April 2009 MAIDEN SPEECH Hon. CR DICK (Greenslopes—ALP) (Attorney-General and Minister for Industrial Relations) (7.30 pm): I start tonight by acknowledging the traditional owners of the land where this parliament stands who have served and nurtured this land for centuries. I pay tribute to them and their great role in our history. It is in this reflection of history that I begin tonight. In December 1862, three short years after the birth of our great state, whose 150th anniversary we celebrate this year, the sailing ship Conway arrived in the small Queensland settlement then known as Moreton Bay. History little records the fate of the Conway, its passengers and its crew, but one thing is known about that day in December 1862: that is the day my family arrived in Queensland and began its Queensland journey. Almost 150 years later, that journey has taken me to this place, the Queensland parliament. I stand tonight as a representative of the people in our state’s legislature, not only as a fifth-generation Queenslander but also with great humility and honour as a son of the state seat of Greenslopes, the electorate I now serve as a member of parliament. My first thanks this evening go to those people who make up the community of Greenslopes. It is a wonderful and diverse community and I look forward to serving them to the best of my ability. This electorate is very dear to my heart. It was at Holland Park, in the Greenslopes electorate, that I was raised as a boy.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Volume of Additional Information
    Legal Affairs, Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Committee Estimates - 2011 Volume of Additional Information Contents Correspondence from the Leader of the House Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 17 June 2011. Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 24 June 2011. Copy of correspondence from Hon Judy Spence MP, Leader of the House to Hon John Mickel MP, Speaker, dated 25 July 2011. Minutes of meetings 17 June 2011 19 July 2011 19 July 2011 26 July 2011 Minister for Justice and Attorney-General Questions on notice and the Minister’s answers Documents tabled at the hearing Answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing Minister for Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Questions on notice and the Minister’s answers Documents tabled at the hearing Answers to questions taken on notice at the hearing Correspondence from the Minister dated 25 July 2011 Correspondence from the Leader of the House 17 June 2011 24 June 2011 25 July 2011 Minutes of meetings 17 June 2011 19 July 2011 19 July 2011 26 July 2011 - M I N U T E S - Minutes of a meeting of the Legal Affairs, Police, Corrective Services and Emergency Services Committee on Friday 17 June 2011 at 1.28pm Present: Hon Dean Wells MP (Chair) Mr John-Paul Langbroek MP (Deputy Chair) Mrs Julie Attwood MP Mr Jarrod Bleijie MP Mr Chris Foley MP Mrs Betty Kiernan MP (until 1.59pm) Apologies: In attendance: Ms Barbara Stone MP Mr Stephen Finnimore, Research Director Ms Amanda Honeyman, Principal Research Officer Hearing schedule: At the meeting, members were provided with two draft hearing schedule options, and copies of all departmental structures, statutory authorities and senior officers of the departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2010
    Office of the Governor Annual Report 2010 - 2011 To obtain information about the content of this report, please contact: Air Commodore Mark Gower OAM (Retd) Official Secretary Office of the Governor, Queensland GPO Box 434 Brisbane Qld 4001 Telephone: (07) 3858 5700 Facsimile: (07) 3858 5701 Email: [email protected] Information about the activities of the Queensland Governor and the operations of the Office of the Governor is available at the following internet address: www.govhouse.qld.gov.au Internet annual report: www.govhouse.qld.gov.au/news_media/annual_reports.aspx Copyright and ISSN © The State of Queensland (Office of the Governor) 2011. Copyright protects this publication except for purposes permitted by the Copyright Act. Reproduction by whatever means is prohibited without the prior written permission of the accountable officer. ISSN 1837 – 2775 Aim of Report The Office of the Governor Annual Report 2010–2011 is an integral part of the Office of the Governor’s corporate governance framework and describes the achievements, performance, outlook and financial position of the Office for the financial year. The Annual Report is a key accountability document and the principal way in which the Office reports on activities and provides a full and complete picture of its performance to Parliament and the wider community. The Report covers the objectives, activities and performance of the Office during the period 1 July 2010 to 30 June 2011 and includes information and images that illustrate the many activities which the Office undertakes to provide personal, administrative and logistic support to the Governor and manage the Government House Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Court Politics in a Federal Polity AJPS Submitted
    Australian Journal of Political Science For Peer Review Only Court Politics in a F ederal Polity Journal: Australian Journal of Political Science Manuscript ID: Draft Manuscript Type: Original Article Keywords: court politics, core executive, Queensland URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cajp Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 28 Australian Journal of Political Science 1 1 Court politics 2 3 4 5 COURT POLITICS IN A FEDERAL POLITY 6 7 8 9 10 11 Introduction 12 Australian political scientists have explored the core executive only episodically. Rhodes 13 14 and Wanna’sFor (2009) review Peer of the literature Review found little research on Only Australian executive politics; it 15 16 1 17 was ‘almost devoid of theory, even controversies’. Other characteristics include: the 18 19 predominance of realpolitik in accounts of executive power and a tendency to emphasise ‘practice 20 21 over theory, commentary over fieldwork, and teaching over research’ (Rhodes and Wanna 2009, 22 23 129-30). Weller (2005, 37) concurs, noting the academic literature provides ‘slim pickings for a 24 25 reader who wants to know how the executive system of government works in Australia’. The 26 27 28 challenge for Australian political scientists, therefore, is to provide theoretically informed studies of 29 2 30 the political executive based on original fieldwork. Strangio, ‘tHart and Walter (2013) also call for 31 32 a greater focus on the political executive. They exhort the next generation of scholars to pursue an 33 34 ‘integrated approach to the study of prime ministerial leadership, focusing on the interplay 35 36 between political circumstances, institutional possibilities, individual characteristics and social 37 38 39 relations at the apex of executive government’ (Strangio et al.
    [Show full text]
  • 05.01.07Combined.Pdf
    QueenslandQueensland Government Government Gazette Gazette PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 344] FRIDAY, 5 JANUARY, 2007 You Can Advertise In The ‘Gazette’! Contact your state representative regarding the placement of your UNITS START advertisement in the from $485 weekly Queensland Government Gazette... plus GST NAS, National Advertising Services QLD Marlene Ellison ph: 07 5577 9499 fax: 07 5577 9433 Horne Media NSW / ACT Jonathon Tremain ph: 02 9955 3545 fax: 02 9955 3646 VIC / TAS Harry Damoulakis ph: 03 9885 2928 fax: 03 9885 1179 SA / NT Jim Girdler ph: 08 8364 4678 fax: 08 8364 5557 WA Harold Hogan ph: 08 9470 6655 fax: 08 9470 4699 [1973] Queensland Government Gazette EXTRAORDINARY PP 451207100087 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ISSN 0155-9370 Vol. 343] FRIDAY, 22 DECEMBER, 2006 [No. 123 NOTICE Premier’s Office Brisbane, 21 December 2006 Her Excellency the Governor directs it to be notified that, acting under the provisions of the Constitution of Queensland 2001, she has appointed the Honourable Paul Thomas Lucas MP, Minister for Transport and Main Roads to act as, and to perform all of the functions and exercise all of the powers of, Minister for State Development, Employment and Industrial Relations from 19 January 2007 until the Honourable Reginald John Mickel MP returns to duty. PETER BEATTIE MP PREMIER AND MINISTER FOR TRADE NOTICE Premier’s Office Brisbane, 21 December 2006 Her Excellency the Governor directs it to be notified that, acting under the provisions of the Constitution of Queensland 2001, she has appointed the Honourable Rodney Jon Welford MP, Minister for Education and Training Minister for the Arts to act as, and to perform all of the functions and exercise all of the powers of, Minister for Health from 1 January 2007 until the Honourable Stephen Robertson MP returns to Queensland.
    [Show full text]
  • Queensland January to June 2004
    Political Chronicles 605 Queensland January to June 2004 JOHN WANNA Political Science Program, Australian National University, and Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University A Re- Pete Landslide at the 2004 State Election Premier Peter Beattie caught the opposition completely by surprise announcing the state election on 14 January, while most Queenslanders were still on holiday. The Opposition Leader, Lawrence Springborg, working on his farm, raced back to Brisbane, while the Liberals' Leader, Bob Quinn, caught an early flight interrupting his family holiday in Sydney. Just as with the 2001 poll, Beattie's timing meant the campaign would occur over the summer break with few paying attention to politics. Beattie's repeat of a successful tactic reeked of opportunism. Beattie brought on the snap poll in an attempt to clear the air over systemic maladministration exposed in the Families Department. The department charged with protecting children had failed to act in hundreds of cases of child abuse — especially children in foster case and particularly indigenous children. The public inquiry held by the Crime and Misconduct Commission (CMC) in 2003 discovered a culture of cover- up in the besieged department. Even when given evidence of cases of sexual abuse it felt powerless to act and often did not forward matters to the police. The CMC produced an interim report in January 2004 citing 110 recommendations for change. Beattie admitted publicly that both his government and the department "had failed" and that he would provide funding to implement the reforms (Courier-Mail, 7 January 2004). He stated his intention of seeking a mandate to fix the foster care crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • VP 16 March 2004
    16 Mar 2004 1 LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF QUEENSLAND FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY–FIRST PARLIAMENT VOTES AND PROCEEDINGS NO. 1 – TUESDAY, 16 MARCH 2004 CONTENTS PROCLAMATION CONVENING THE PARLIAMENT ............................................................................ 2 COMMISSION TO OPEN PARLIAMENT................................................................................................ 2 COMMISSION TO ADMINISTER OATH OR AFFIRMATION................................................................. 2 RETURN OF WRIT ................................................................................................................................. 3 MEMBERS SWORN................................................................................................................................ 4 PRESIDING MEMBER ............................................................................................................................ 5 ELECTION OF SPEAKER (Hansard p. 3, 10.42 am)..................................................................................... 5 PRESENTATION OF SPEAKER ............................................................................................................ 6 SPECIAL ADJOURNMENT..................................................................................................................... 6 ADJOURNMENT ..................................................................................................................................... 6 ATTENDANCE .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
    The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 The Ayes Have It: The history of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989 JOHN WANNA AND TRACEY ARKLAY THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E P R E S S E P R E S S Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/qldparliament_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Ayes Have It: History of Queensland Parliament 1957-1989 / John Wanna and Tracey Arklay ISBN: 9781921666308 (pbk.) 9781921666315 (pdf) Notes: Bibliography. Subjects: Politics, Australian Politics History of Australian politics, Queensland Parliament History from 1957 - 1989 Other Authors/Contributors: John Wanna and Tracey Arklay All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU E Press All images supplied by the Queensland Parliamentary Library. Printed by Griffin Press. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . .vii 1 . Inside the Queensland Parliament . 1 Part I 2 . Parliament’s refusal of supply and defeat of Labor, 1957 . 29 3 . The early Nicklin years, 1957–1963 . 57 4 . Safely in the saddle: the Nicklin government, 1963–1968 . 87 5 . The Nicklin government’s legislative program . 125 6 . The oppositional parties in the Parliament, 1957–1968 . 167 7 . The Pizzey–Chalk interlude, 1968 . 203 Part II 8 .
    [Show full text]
  • Resisting Executive Control in Queensland's Unicameral Legislature
    Dr Kate Jones and Professor Scott Prasser are with the Public Policy Institute, Australian Catholic University Resisting executive control in Queensland’s unicameral legislature — recent developments and the changing role of the speaker in Queensland Kate Jones and Scott Prasser Queensland has long been criticised for the limitations of its parliamentary system and its excessive dominance by executive government. The 1989 Fitzgerald Commission of Inquiry into Possible Illegal Activities and Associated Police Misconduct (henceforth called the Fitzgerald Inquiry), pinpointed Queensland’s system of government and particularly its weak parliamentary system as one of the main causes for the State’s endemic corruption. As the Fitzgerald Report (1989: 123) lamented: Any government may use its dominance in the Parliament and its control of public resources to stifle and neuter effective criticism by the Opposition … A government can use its control of Parliament and public administration to manipulate, exploit and misinform the community, or to hide matters from it. According to Fitzgerald (1989: 123–5) debate was stifled, parliamentary sitting days too few, the Opposition restrained, question-time redundant and the committee system minimalist. Also, the Speaker of Parliament, the supposed independent chair, was perceived as too partisan, one of the prizes bestowed on party stalwarts by executive government (Fitzgerald 1989: 123). While these criticisms were legitimately aimed at Queensland’s National Party government (1983–89), they applied equally to previous Coalition (1957–1983) and Labor administrations (1915–1929; 1932–1957). Strong executive control of parliament was a Queensland tradition. Although not too different from other states, the problem was exacerbated by Queensland’s lack of an upper house — abolished by Labor in 1922 despite a referendum to the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • For Peer Review Only
    Australian Journal of Political Science For Peer Review Only Court Politics in a F ederal Polity Journal: Australian Journal of Political Science Manuscript ID: CAJP-2014-0109.R1 Manuscript Type: Original Article Keywords: court politics, core executive, Queensland, Bligh government URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/cajp Email: [email protected] Page 1 of 31 Australian Journal of Political Science 1 1 Court politics 2 3 4 COURT POLITICS IN A FEDERAL POLITY 5 6 7 8 Introduction 9 Australian political scientists have explored the core executive only episodically. XXXX 10 11 and Wanna’s (2009) review of the literature including textbooks, journalism, biographies and 12 13 memoirs led them to conclude there was little research on Australian executive politics; it was 14 For Peer Review Only 15 16 ‘almost devoid of theory, even controversies’. Other characteristics include: the predominance of 17 18 realpolitik in accounts of executive power and a tendency to emphasise ‘practice over theory, 19 20 commentary over fieldwork, and teaching over research’ (XXXX and Wanna 2009, 129-30). 21 22 Weller (2005, 37) concurs. He notes the academic literature provides ‘slim pickings for a reader 23 24 who wants to know how the executive system of government works in Australia’. The challenge for 25 26 27 Australian political scientists, therefore, is to provide theoretically informed studies of the political 28 1 29 executive based on original fieldwork. Strangio, ‘tHart and Walter (2013) also call for a greater 30 31 focus on the political executive. They exhort the next generation of scholars to pursue an 32 33 ‘integrated approach to the study of prime ministerial leadership, focusing on the interplay 34 35 between political circumstances, institutional possibilities, individual characteristics and social 36 37 38 relations at the apex of executive government’ (Strangio et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Chronicles the Commonwealth of Australia
    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 50, Number 4, 2004, pp. 588-639. Political Chronicles The Commonwealth of Australia January to June 2004 PAUL D. WILLIAMS Politics and Public Policy, Griffith University The first half of 2004 saw newly installed Labor leader, Mark Latham, carve out a distinctive — if quasi-populist — leadership style while also exerting upon John Howard a heightened level of public questioning as to the honesty of his Government. Indeed, the Prime Minister had never appeared more “rattled”. The politics of personal abuse then plumbed new depths as each leader defended his integrity. The major parties’ public opinion standing fluctuated accordingly. A generous Government Budget was matched by Labor’s flight of numerous populist policy kites that saw election speculation become a journalistic sport. National Economy The Australian economy was at no time a liability for the Government. In March, national growth topped an annual rate of 4 per cent. After falling to a 23 year low of 5.5 per cent, the unemployment rate closed the period at 5.7 per cent, while inflation, too, remained low at an annual rate, by June, of 2.5 per cent. Housing costs largely dominated economic discussion, with a general agreement the housing “bubble” had at last burst. January alone saw a 10 per cent decline in home loan approvals (Weekend Australian, 13-14 March 2004). When, in April, the Productivity Commission released its report into housing affordability, few were surprised when it found that “negative gearing” was largely responsible. The Commission’s recommendation to review generous investor tax breaks was ignored by the Treasurer.
    [Show full text]