Population Distribution and Abundance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Population Distribution and Abundance Final PDF to printer SECTION III Population Ecology 9 Population Distribution and Abundance A population of saguaro cactus, Carnegiea gigantea, at Saguaro National Park near Tucson, Arizona. The natural distribution of the 9.4 Population density declines with saguaro cactus is restricted to the Sonoran Desert, extending from central Arizona through northwestern Mexico. Because saguaro cactus increasing organism size. 212 are very sensitive to freezing, the northern limit and highest elevations Concept 9.4 Review 213 occupied by the species appear limited by low temperatures. Applications: Rarity and Vulnerability to Extinction 214 Summary 216 CHAPTER CONCEPTS Key Terms 217 Review Questions 217 9.1 Environment limits the geographic distribution of species. 200 Concept 9.1 Review 204 LEARNING OUTCOMES After studying this section you should be able to do the following: 9.2 On small scales, individuals within populations are distributed in patterns 9.1 Define population, density, and abundance. that may be random, regular, or 9.2 Compare the characteristics of gray whale, monarch clumped. 204 butterfly, and Monterey pine populations. Concept 9.2 Review 208 9.3 Outline some of the reasons ecologists study populations. 9.3 On large scales, individuals within a population are clumped. 208 he distributions and dynamics of populations vary Investigating the Evidence 9: widely among species. While some populations are Clumped, Random, and Regular T small and have highly restricted distributions, other Distributions 209 populations number in the millions and may range over vast areas of the planet. Standing on a headland in central California Concept 9.3 Review 211 overlooking the Pacific Ocean, a small class of students spots a group of gray whales, Eschrichtius robustus, rising to the 198 moL37282_ch09_198-217.indd 198 27/08/14 10:59 pm Final PDF to printer Chapter 9 Population Distribution and Abundance 199 from as far away as the Rocky Mountains of southern Canada. As the students watch the whales, the male monarch butterflies pursue and mate with the female monarch butterflies. After mating, the males die, while the females begin a migration that leads inland and north. The females stop to lay eggs on milkweeds they encounter along the way and eventually die; however, their offspring continue the migration. Monarch caterpillars grow quickly on their diet of milkweed and then transform to a pupa or chrysalis. The monarch butterflies that emerge from the chrysalises (or chrysalides) mate and, like the previous generation, fly northward and inland. By moving far- ther north and inland each generation, some of the monarch butterflies eventually reach the Rocky Mountains of southern Canada, far from where their ancestors fluttered around the (a) group of students on the pine-covered coastal headland. Then, as the autumn days grow shorter, the monarch butterflies begin their long flight back to the coastal grove of pines. This autumn generation, which numbers in the millions, flies southwest to its wintering grounds on the coast of central and southern California. Some of the monarchs might fly over 3,000 km. The monarch butterflies that survive the trip to the pine grove overwinter, hanging from particular roost trees in the thousands. They mate in the following spring and start the cycle all over again. Gray whales and monarch butterflies, as different as they may appear, lead parallel lives. The Monterey pines, Pinus radi- ata, covering the headland where the monarch butterflies over- winter and by which the gray whales pass twice each year are quite different. The Monterey pine population does not migrate (b) each generation and has a highly restricted distribution. The cur- rent natural range of the Monterey pine is limited to a few sites Figure 9.1 (a) A young gray whale, Eschrichtius robustus. During on the coast of central and northern California and to two islands their annual migration, gray whales migrate from subtropical waters off off the coast of western Mexico. These scattered populations are Baja California to the Arctic and back again, passing along the coast of California as they do so. (b) Along that same coast, monarch but- the remnants of a large, continuous population that extended for terflies, Danaus plexippus, winter in huge numbers, some having flown over 800 km along the California coast during the cooler cli- thousands of kilometers from the Rocky Mountains to reach the trees mate of the last glacial period. This history of the Monterey pine where they roost in winter. In contrast, the entire natural population of underscores a very important fact about species distributions: the Monterey pine, Pinus radiata, is restricted to five small areas along they are highly dynamic, especially over long periods of time. the California coast. With these three examples, we begin to consider the ecol- ogy of populations. Ecologists usually define a population surface and spouting water as they swim northward ( fig. 9.1a ). as a group of individuals of a single species inhabiting a spe- The whales are rounding the point of land on their way to cific area. A population of plants or animals might occupy a feeding grounds off the coasts of Alaska and Siberia. This mountaintop, a river basin, a coastal marsh, or an island, all particular group is made up of females and calves. The calves areas defined by natural boundaries. Just as often, the popu- were born during the previous winter along the coast of Baja lations studied by biologists occupy artificially defined areas California, the gray whale’s wintering grounds. Over the course such as a country, county, or national park. The areas inhab- of the spring, the entire population of over 20,000 gray whales ited by populations range in size from the few cubic centime- will round this same headland on their way to the Bering and ters occupied by the bacteria in a rotting apple to the millions Chukchi seas. Gray whales travel from one end of their range to of square kilometers occupied by a population of migratory the other twice each year, a distance of about 18,000 km. Home whales. A population studied by ecologists may consist of a to the gray whale encompasses a swath of seacoast extending highly localized group of individuals representing a fraction from southern Baja California to the coast of northeast Asia. of the total population of a species, or it may consist of all the The grove of pine trees on the headland where the individuals of a species across its entire range. students stand gazing at the whales is winter home to another Ecologists study populations for many reasons. Popu- long-distance traveler: monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus lation studies hold the key to saving endangered species, ( fig. 9.1 b ). The lazy flying of the bright orange and black mon- controlling pest populations, and managing fish and game arch butterflies gives no hint of their capacity to migrate. Some populations. They also offer clues to understanding and con- of the butterflies flew to the grove of pines the previous autumn trolling disease epidemics. Finally, the greatest environmental moL37282_ch09_198-217.indd 199 27/08/14 10:59 pm Final PDF to printer 200 Section III Population Ecology challenge to biological diversity and the integrity of the entire writings, Grinnell’s ideas of the niche centered around the biosphere is at its heart a population problem—the growth of influences of the physical environment, while Elton’s earliest the human population. concept included biological interactions as well as abiotic fac- All populations share several characteristics. The first is tors. However their thinking and emphasis may have differed, their d i s t r i b u t i o n . The distribution of a population includes the it is clear that the views of these two researchers had much size, shape, and location of the area it occupies. A population in common and that our present concept of the niche rests also has a characteristic pattern of spacing of the individuals squarely on their pioneering work. within it. It is also characterized by the number of individuals We can now point to a single paper authored by G. Evelyn within it and their d e n s i t y , which is the number of individuals Hutchinson (1957) as the agent that crystallized the niche con- per unit area. Additional characteristics of populations—their cept. In this seminal paper titled simply “Concluding Remarks,” age distributions, birth and death rates, immigration and emi- Hutchinson defined the niche as an n-dimensional hypervolume, gration rates, and rates of growth—are the subject of chapters where n equals the number of environmental factors important 10 and 11. In chapter 9 we focus on two population character- to the survival and reproduction by a species. Hutchinson called istics: distribution and a b u n d a n c e , the total number of indi- this hypervolume, which specifies the values of the n e n v i r o n - viduals, or biomass, of a species in a specified area. mental factors permitting a species to survive and reproduce, as the f u n d a m e n t a l n i c h e of the species. The fundamental niche defines the physical conditions under which a species might 9.1 Distribution Limits live, in the absence of interactions with other species. However, LEARNING OUTCOMES Hutchinson recognized that interactions such as competition may After studying this section you should be able to do the following: restrict the environments in which a species may live. He referred to these more restricted conditions as the r e a l i z e d n i c h e , which is 9.4 Define niche and distinguish between the fundamen- the actual niche of a species whose distribution is limited by biotic tal niche and the realized niche.
Recommended publications
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • This Work Is Licensed Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
    This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. THE TIGER BEETLES OF ALBERTA (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE, CICINDELINI)' Gerald J. Hilchie Department of Entomology University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E3. Quaestiones Entomologicae 21:319-347 1985 ABSTRACT In Alberta there are 19 species of tiger beetles {Cicindela). These are found in a wide variety of habitats from sand dunes and riverbanks to construction sites. Each species has a unique distribution resulting from complex interactions of adult site selection, life history, competition, predation and historical factors. Post-pleistocene dispersal of tiger beetles into Alberta came predominantly from the south with a few species entering Alberta from the north and west. INTRODUCTION Wallis (1961) recognized 26 species of Cicindela in Canada, of which 19 occur in Alberta. Most species of tiger beetle in North America are polytypic but, in Alberta most are represented by a single subspecies. Two species are represented each by two subspecies and two others hybridize and might better be described as a single species with distinct subspecies. When a single subspecies is present in the province morphs normally attributed to other subspecies may also be present, in which case the most common morph (over 80% of a population) is used for subspecies designation. Tiger beetles have always been popular with collectors. Bright colours and quick flight make these beetles a sporting and delightful challenge to collect.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Conservation of an Imperiled Tiger Beetle Fauna in New York State, USA
    J Insect Conserv (2011) 15:839–852 DOI 10.1007/s10841-011-9382-y ORIGINAL PAPER Status and conservation of an imperiled tiger beetle fauna in New York State, USA Matthew D. Schlesinger • Paul G. Novak Received: 29 October 2010 / Accepted: 17 January 2011 / Published online: 15 February 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract New York has 22 documented species of tiger Introduction beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae). Over half of these species are considered rare, at risk, or potentially extirpated Tiger beetles (Coleoptera: Cicindelidae) are strikingly from the state. These rare species specialize on three sandy patterned, predatory insects that have captured the attention habitat types under threat from human disturbance: bea- of entomologists and collectors for centuries. Beyond their ches, pine barrens, and riparian cobble bars. In 2005, we intrinsic interest, tiger beetles can serve as model organ- began a status assessment of eight of New York’s rarest isms or indicator species to enable broad conclusions about tiger beetles, examining museum records, searching the a region or ecosystem’s biodiversity (Pearson and Cassola literature, and conducting over 130 field surveys of his- 1992; Pearson and Vogler 2001). Tiger beetles are threa- torical and new locations. Significant findings included (1) tened by habitat destruction and modification, alteration of no detections of four of the eight taxa; (2) no vehicle-free natural processes like fire and flooding, and overcollection; beach habitat suitable for reintroducing Cicindela dorsalis across the United States, approximately 15% of taxa are dorsalis; (3) C. hirticollis at only 4 of 26 historical loca- threatened with extinction (Pearson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    Prepared by Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources with Assistance from Conservation Partners Natural Resources Board Approved August 2005 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Acceptance September 2005 Wisconsin’s Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Governor Jim Doyle Natural Resources Board Gerald M. O’Brien, Chair Howard D. Poulson, Vice-Chair Jonathan P Ela, Secretary Herbert F. Behnke Christine L. Thomas John W. Welter Stephen D. Willet Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Scott Hassett, Secretary Laurie Osterndorf, Division Administrator, Land Paul DeLong, Division Administrator, Forestry Todd Ambs, Division Administrator, Water Amy Smith, Division Administrator, Enforcement and Science Recommended Citation: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 2005. Wisconsin's Strategy for Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Madison, WI. “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” – John Muir The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources provides equal opportunity in its employment, programs, services, and functions under an Affirmative Action Plan. If you have any questions, please write to Equal Opportunity Office, Department of Interior, Washington D.C. 20240. This publication can be made available in alternative formats (large print, Braille, audio-tape, etc.) upon request. Please contact the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Endangered Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707 or call (608) 266-7012 for copies of this report. Pub-ER-641 2005
    [Show full text]
  • A TAXONOMIC STUDY of POPULATIONS of TIGER BEETLES in the CICINDELA LONGILABRIS COMPLEX from the BLACK HILLS of SOUTH DAKOTA Stephen M
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Great Plains Studies, Center for Social Sciences Fall 2009 A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF POPULATIONS OF TIGER BEETLES IN THE CICINDELA LONGILABRIS COMPLEX FROM THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA Stephen M. Spomer University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch Part of the American Studies Commons Spomer, Stephen M., "A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF POPULATIONS OF TIGER BEETLES IN THE CICINDELA LONGILABRIS COMPLEX FROM THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA" (2009). Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences. 1065. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/greatplainsresearch/1065 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Great Plains Studies, Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Research: A Journal of Natural and Social Sciences by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Great Plains Research 19 (Fall 2009):169-77 © 2009 Copyright by the Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF POPULATIONS OF TIGER BEETLES IN THE CICINDELA LONGILABRIS COMPLEX FROM THE BLACK HILLS OF SOUTH DAKOTA S. M. Spomer Department of Entomology 208 Entomology Hall University of Nebraska Lincoln, NE 68583-0816 [email protected] ABSTRACT—Three phenotypes within the Cicindela longilabris complex are present in the vicinity of the Black Hills in South Dakota: Laurent’s boreal long-lipped tiger beetle, Cicindela longilabris laurentii; the prairie long-lipped tiger beetle, Cicindela nebraskana; and a third phenotype that shares characteristics of both spe- cies.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Niche Partitioning in a Sympatric Tiger Beetle Assemblage and Implications for the Endangered Salt Creek Tiger Beetle
    Behavioral niche partitioning in a sympatric tiger beetle assemblage and implications for the endangered Salt Creek tiger beetle Tierney R. Brosius1 and Leon G. Higley2 1 Department of Biology, Augustana College, Rock Island, IL, USA 2 Biochemistry Hall, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA ABSTRACT How behavioral patterns are related to niche partitioning is an important question in understanding how closely related species within ecological communities function. Behavioral niche partitioning associated with thermoregulation is well documented in tiger beetles as a group. Co-occurring species of salt flat tiger beetles have adapted many thermoregulatory behaviors to cope with this harsh ecosystem. On first ex- amination these beetles appear to occur in overlapping microhabitats and therefore compete for resources. To determine if behavioral niche partitioning is allowing multiple species to occur within the same harsh salt flat ecosystem we observed Cicindela nevadica lincolniana, Cicindela circumpicta, Cicindela fulgida, and Cicindela togata between 8:00 h and 21:00 h and recorded all behaviors related to thermoregulation using a digital voice recorder. Results of this study strongly indicate that competition among these species for resources has been reduced by the adapta- tion of diVerent thermoregulatory behaviors such as spending time in shallow water, avoiding the sun during the hottest parts of the day, and by positioning their body against or away from the soil. The endangered C. n. lincolniana appears to rely most heavily on the shallow water of seeps for their diurnal foraging behavior (potentially limiting their foraging habitat), but with the advantage of allowing foraging during Submitted 23 July 2013 Accepted 31 August 2013 the hottest times of the day when potential competitors are less frequent.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 D Contents 10\ ~1/' ------'------~~
    NSECTS THE NEWSJOURNALOF THE TORONTO ENTOMOLOGISTS' ASSOCIATION VOLUME 7, NUMBER2 JANUARY2002 D Contents 10\ ~1/' ----------'-----------------~~ From the Editor's Desk 25 Announcements 25 Upcoming Meetings 26 Meeting Reports 28 Field TripReports 29 Tiger Beetles of the Bruce Peninsula by Steve Marshall ; 30 Cicindela hirticollis • new to Pelee Island by Mike Gurr 34 Results of the 2001 Pelee Island Butterfly and Odonate Counts by Bob Bowles 34 Butterflies in the Publication "Wild Species 2000" • worse than it looks by Paul Catling : 36 Results of the 2001 Carden and Orillia ButterflyC()untsby Bob Bowles 38 Results of the 2001 Carden Odonate Count by Bob Bowles 39 Sixth Annual Algonquin Odonate Count by Colm D. Jones 40 The Insect Net 42 The Bookworm 43 T.E.A. Lepidoptera and Odonata Summaries 44 Flea Market (Classitieds) .Inside Back Cover Items for Sale throught the T.E.A Back Cover Front Cover Photograph:· BeachDune Tiger Beetle (Cicindella hirticollis) at Rondeau Provincial Park. Photo taken by Dr. Steve Marshall of the University of Guelph. Issue Date: January 23, 2002 ISSN: l:lL'j-j~~) DEADLINE INFORMATION· Members Please Note: The deadline for submissions to the May 2002 issue of Ontario Insects is April 1. Late submissions may be added at the discretion of the Editor after that date. Ifthere are any questions or concerns regarding submissions, please feel free to contact Colin Jones at the address below. Please remember when submitting electronic information to minimize formatting and send documents as plain text wherever possible. OntarioInsects the significant finds we made, or of some of the interesting Notes from the Editor's Desk observations we witnessed.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum
    Appendix 5: Fauna Known to Occur on Fort Drum LIST OF FAUNA KNOWN TO OCCUR ON FORT DRUM as of January 2017. Federally listed species are noted with FT (Federal Threatened) and FE (Federal Endangered); state listed species are noted with SSC (Species of Special Concern), ST (State Threatened, and SE (State Endangered); introduced species are noted with I (Introduced). INSECT SPECIES Except where otherwise noted all insect and invertebrate taxonomy based on (1) Arnett, R.H. 2000. American Insects: A Handbook of the Insects of North America North of Mexico, 2nd edition, CRC Press, 1024 pp; (2) Marshall, S.A. 2013. Insects: Their Natural History and Diversity, Firefly Books, Buffalo, NY, 732 pp.; (3) Bugguide.net, 2003-2017, http://www.bugguide.net/node/view/15740, Iowa State University. ORDER EPHEMEROPTERA--Mayflies Taxonomy based on (1) Peckarsky, B.L., P.R. Fraissinet, M.A. Penton, and D.J. Conklin Jr. 1990. Freshwater Macroinvertebrates of Northeastern North America. Cornell University Press. 456 pp; (2) Merritt, R.W., K.W. Cummins, and M.B. Berg 2008. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 4th Edition. Kendall Hunt Publishing. 1158 pp. FAMILY LEPTOPHLEBIIDAE—Pronggillled Mayflies FAMILY BAETIDAE—Small Minnow Mayflies Habrophleboides sp. Acentrella sp. Habrophlebia sp. Acerpenna sp. Leptophlebia sp. Baetis sp. Paraleptophlebia sp. Callibaetis sp. Centroptilum sp. FAMILY CAENIDAE—Small Squaregilled Mayflies Diphetor sp. Brachycercus sp. Heterocloeon sp. Caenis sp. Paracloeodes sp. Plauditus sp. FAMILY EPHEMERELLIDAE—Spiny Crawler Procloeon sp. Mayflies Pseudocentroptiloides sp. Caurinella sp. Pseudocloeon sp. Drunela sp. Ephemerella sp. FAMILY METRETOPODIDAE—Cleftfooted Minnow Eurylophella sp. Mayflies Serratella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns and Drivers of Terrestrial Arthropod Biodiversity in Northern Canada
    Patterns and drivers of terrestrial arthropod biodiversity in northern Canada Crystal M. Ernst Department of Natural Resource Sciences McGill University Montreal, Quebec, Canada April 2015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Crystal M. Ernst 2015 Abstract The overarching goal of this thesis was to describe patterns of terrestrial arthropod biodiversity and community structure in northern Canada, and to explore the underlying drivers and mechanisms that are responsible for these patterns. The term “biodiversity” is used here in a broad sense that includes both taxonomic (TD) and functional (FD) diversity. Ground-dwelling arthropods, especially beetles (Coleoptera), were used as model taxa, and were collected using standardized methods from twelve locations in the three northernmost ecoclimatic zones of Canada. Beetle biodiversity changes over time and space. Over the course of one active season, rapid species and functional turnover were observed in two major habitats in one subarctic location (Kugluktuk, Nunavut). While some functional groups were apparent only for brief periods of time, entomophagous predators consistently dominated the assemblage structure in biomass and abundance. This dominance by carnivores was observed consistently throughout the study, regardless of spatial or taxonomic scope. This inverted trophic structure suggests that predators may rely on alternative, non-epigeic prey items. A natural history study of previously unknown host-parasite interactions between beetles and nematomorphs (Gordionus n. sp.) suggests that beetles use alate insects with aquatic larval stages as an important nutrient subsidy. Across the entire study region, beetle TD and FD, as well as overall assemblage structure, display strong negative relationships with latitude, which conforms to the classical latitudinal gradient of diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrate SGCN Conservation Reports Vermont’S Wildlife Action Plan 2015
    Appendix A4 Invertebrate SGCN Conservation Reports Vermont’s Wildlife Action Plan 2015 Species ............................................................ page Ant Group ................................................................ 2 Bumble Bee Group ................................................... 6 Beetles-Carabid Group ............................................ 11 Beetles-Tiger Beetle Group ..................................... 23 Butterflies-Grassland Group .................................... 28 Butterflies-Hardwood Forest Group .......................... 32 Butterflies-Wetland Group ....................................... 36 Moths Group .......................................................... 40 Mayflies/Stoneflies/Caddisflies Group ....................... 47 Odonates-Bog/Fen/Swamp/Marshy Pond Group ....... 50 Odonates-Lakes/Ponds Group ................................. 56 Odonates-River/Stream Group ................................ 61 Crustaceans Group ................................................. 66 Freshwater Mussels Group ...................................... 70 Freshwater Snails Group ......................................... 82 Vermont Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Action Plan - Revision 2015 Species Conservation Report Common Name: Ant Group Scientific Name: Ant Group Species Group: Invert Conservation Assessment Final Assessment: High Priority Global Rank: Global Trend: State Rank: State Trend: Unknown Extirpated in VT? No Regional SGCN? Assessment Narrative: This group consists of the following
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Life History Differences Predict Genomic Divergence Better Than Mitochondrial Barcodes Or Phenotype
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Article Geographic Life History Differences Predict Genomic Divergence Better than Mitochondrial Barcodes or Phenotype Daniel P. Duran 1,*, Robert A. Laroche 2, Harlan M. Gough 3, Rodger A. Gwiazdowski 4,5, Charles B. Knisley 6, David P. Herrmann 7, Stephen J. Roman 8 and Scott P. Egan 2 1 Department of Environmental Science, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA 2 Department of BioSciences, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005, USA; [email protected] (R.A.L.); [email protected] (S.P.E.) 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; goughh@ufl.edu 4 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01002, USA; [email protected] 5 Advanced BioConsulting, LLC, Shrewsbury, MA 01545, USA 6 Department of Biology, Randolph-Macon College, Ashland, VA 23005, USA; [email protected] 7 1346 Montgomery Lane, Southlake, TX 76092, USA; [email protected] 8 178 Winecup Way, Austin, TX 78737, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 January 2020; Accepted: 26 February 2020; Published: 29 February 2020 Abstract: Species diversity can be inferred using multiple data types, however, results based on genetic data can be at odds with patterns of phenotypic variation. Tiger beetles of the Cicindelidia politula (LeConte, 1875) species complex have been taxonomically problematic due to extreme phenotypic variation within and between populations. To better understand the biology and taxonomy of this group, we used mtDNA genealogies and multilocus nuclear analyses of 34,921 SNPs to elucidate its evolutionary history and evaluate the validity of phenotypically circumscribed species and subspecies.
    [Show full text]
  • Bring on the Bugs….Beneficial Ones That Is!
    3/5/2013 Bring on the Bugs….Beneficial ones that is! What is a Benificial “Bug”? Any arthropod that is advantageous to a gardener or a farmer. 1 3/5/2013 What is an Arthropod? Animal with segmented bodies, exoskeletons and jointed appendages. Trilobites Crustaceans Spiders Millipedes Centipedes Insects 2 3/5/2013 Identification Easy Spider Identification 3 3/5/2013 Easy Millipede Identification Easy Centipede Identification 4 3/5/2013 Easy Insect Identification 5 3/5/2013 Insect Diversity • Over 1 million described species (>65% animal diversity) • 5-80 million species total • Well over 16,000 species in NY State • Of the million described ~1000 are considered serious pests (about 1/10 of 1%) Calligrapha rowena Incomplete Metamorphosis 6 3/5/2013 Complete Metamorphosis Insect Feeding Habits: • Predators • Parasites / Parasitoids • Herbivores • Fungivores / detritivores Important to know in order to provide food source/habitat 7 3/5/2013 Attracting Beneficials: Generally Speaking… Change Our Thinking/Behavior Invite Them In “….we are part of an integrated ecosystem, with a set of principles that are nature’s not man’s.” 8 3/5/2013 Ecosystem Gardening “When one tugs at a single thing in nature, he finds it attached to the rest of the world.” ~John Muir 9 3/5/2013 Eliminate/Reduce Pesticides Invite “Bugs” In!? • Provide Food, Shelter, Water & a Place to Reproduce • Create Diverse Habitats Interplant veggies & flowers Underplant Trees & shrubs Vary plant heights REDUCE LAWN/Monocultures 10 3/5/2013 Plant Selection Factors: Bloom
    [Show full text]