DOCSLIB.ORG

The UTG Journal Issue No. 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The UTG Journal Issue No. 3 The UTG Journal Issue No. 3 May 2018, ISSN 2208-9500 (online) © United Tasmania Group Contents: ‘Ecotourism’ – the new greenwash term - by Geoff Holloway page 1 Editorial – Protest rally against proposed cable car on kunanyi page 6 People Power – by Geoff Mosley page 7 Legacy and understanding – by Tom Hogarth page 8 Contact information: For further information please contact: Geoff Holloway (Secretary UTG) [email protected] Facebook sites: https://www.facebook.com/groups/112926085386109/ (general site) https://www.facebook.com/groups/1154609787956205/ (UTG Wilderness Integrity, Tourism & Sustainability) https://www.facebook.com/groups/740273822782089/ (UTG Energy & Climate Change) UTG also has two email-based systems for non-Facebook users. Editorial Committee Geoff Hollloway Kevin Kiernan Anne McConnell Keith Antonysen Geoff Mosley Lyn Barclay Debbie Quarmby Cover photos: Geoff Holloway Inside photo of Barn Bluff, Cradle Mt. National Park, 1936 – from Geoff Holloway Collection UTG fully supports the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCROC) and its associated Protocols. UTG is a signatory/member of: The Rights of Nature https://www.facebook.com/groups/therightsofnature/about/ the Circular Economy https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/ the Steady State Economy http://www.steadystate.org/ 2 ‘Ecotourism’ – the new greenwash out, “Tourism has a problem. It is addicted by Geoff Holloway to growth, which is incompatible with term – sustainability goals. Despite three decades ‘Ecotourism’ is a term that is misused across discussing pathways to sustainable tourism, the world – as all international bodies agree; tourism authorities continue to promote but it is particularly abused/misused by the tourism growth despite the ecological and Tasmanian Government and the Tourism social limits of living on a finite planet … Industry Council of Tasmania (TICT). This is The growth fetish is resulting in tourism not to say that there are not some authentic killing tourism. Almost gone are the days ecotourism enterprises in Tasmania, but they when tourism authorities might support are at extreme risk of losing their status. tourism directed to education, social well- More importantly, ‘ecotourism’ is far from being, inclusion and other non-economic new; it used to be something generations of goals”.4 Tasmanians bushwalkers, climbers, skiers, etc did as an outdoor activity/past-time or Other titles used to describe ‘natural’ philosophy, but without any corporate or approaches to tourism include: Responsible government involvement; and while not Tourism, Sustainable Tourism, Ethical Travel, strictly ‘tourists’ as such, their activities were Eco-friendly travel, Justice Tourism, and similar. The way the term is used today Linking Tourism & Conservation. The Center covers a wide spectrum of tourist activities, for Responsible Travel produces a summary which usually involves ‘nature’, even if just of brief definitions that are being used in the in the form of what should be called more muesli of tourism terminology.5 accurately ‘scenery mining’. Ecotourism Notwithstanding the above, there have been Responsible travel to natural areas that serious attempts to define, and establish conserves the environment and improves the standards for, ecotourism. For example, The welfare of local people. International ecotourism Society (TIES), Geotourism which claims to have over 750 organisational Tourism that sustains or enhances the and 14,000 individual members plus 85,000 geographical character of a place – its followers on facebook, has at least five key environment, heritage, aesthetics, culture and principles at the base of its definition of wellbeing of its residents. ecotourism, namely that it: Pro-Poor Tourism • is non-consumptive and non-extractive Tourism that results in increased net benefit • creates an ecological conscience for the poor people in a destination. • holds ecocentric values and ethics in Ethical Tourism relation to nature Tourism in a destination where ethical issues • is based on community involvement and are the key driver, e.g. social injustice, human consultation rights, animal welfare or the environment. • recognizes the rights and spiritual beliefs of Responsible Tourism the Indigenous people.1 Tourism that maximizes the benefits to local The succinct TIES definition of ecotourism is: communities, minimizes negative social or “Responsible travel to natural areas that environmental impacts, and helps local conserves the environment, sustains the people conserve fragile cultures and habitats wellbeing of the local people and involves or species. interpretation and education”.2 However, this Sustainable Tourism definition does not meet all the principles Tourism that leads to the management of all previously outlined. resources in such a way that economic, social, and aesthetic needs can be fulfilled while Ecotourism is one of many attempts to maintaining cultural integrity, essential promote responsible tourism and ‘sustainable ecological processes, biological diversity and tourism’ - and some commentators argue that life support systems. the later term is an oxymoron 3 . This is because, as Freya Higgins-Desbiolles points 1 Agritourism Last year (2017) was International Year of Agritourism or agro-tourism is a form of Sustainable Tourism for Development – you rural tourism in which tourists see and may not have heard much about this participate in traditional agricultural International Year, as there was not a single practices without destroying the ecosystems. activity within Tasmania. The United Orange tourism Tasmania Group (UTG) did offer to conduct Orange tourism is a sustainable tourism that a seminar but we did not receive a response generates cultural, economic and social until it was too late to organise. However, we development through responsible touristic might try again later this year, given that management of cultural heritage, artistic tourism is, arguably, the greatest threat now production, and cultural and creative facing Tasmania’s National Parks, wilderness industries. and conservation areas. Wellness tourism Travel associated with the goal of Before going into some details about what maintaining or enhancing one’s personal constitutes authentic ecotourism (as the wellbeing. It includes the pursuit of physical, Global Ecotourism Network is now referring mental, spiritual or environmental ‘wellness’. to it), in order to combat the world-wide Adventure tourism problem of exploiting the term ‘ecotourism’ - Adventure tourism includes at least two of and authenticity is one of the key drivers of the following three elements: physical tourists these days, what is very clear in activity, natural environment, and cultural Tasmania is that no transparent standards, immersion. It includes caving, climbing, international or otherwise, are applied to the trekking, camping, birdwatching, rafting, concept or use of the term ‘ecotourism’. Both snorkeling, surfing and other outdoor Government and the Tourism Industry activities. Council of Tasmania (TICT) and its corporate cronies blithely use the term across the board Ecotourism, as such, makes up about 10% of to any venture that they would like to all tourism according to the United National greenwash. This is not to say that there are World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) – no authentic ecotourism ventures in whether it is more or less than that in Tasmania, but even those pale in significance Tasmania is hard to determine. However, the with what happens in some areas overseas Tasmanian Government and the TICT like to (eg, the Grand Canyon8). (mis) apply this term across all sorts of tourism enterprises regardless of validity or In Cabo Verde, with a population the same relevance. One of the reasons for this as Tasmania, where 53% of the GDP comes deceptive behaviour is that governments from tourism, providing 60% of direct and realise that tourists are looking increasingly indirect employment, the term ‘ecotourism’ for ethical, responsible, nature-based tourism has been applied to less than a handful of experiences – some research suggests that enterprises - whereas in Tasmania the term three-quarters of tourists want to contribute is being applied to almost anything that to ethical and responsible tourism AND they operates in the outdoors (including 9 are prepared to pay more for that privilege.6 proposed cable cars). This is sometimes referred to as ‘New Tourism’, and these tourists have a higher Tasmania is like China, where any tourism level of environmental and cultural development or activity located in a natural awareness.7 ‘New tourism’ can be described setting is described as ecotourism; and there as a summation of a few key ethical is no distinction between nature-based principles: tourism and ecotourism, although the latter 1. environmental consciousness can encompass both cultural and 2. responsibility in travel environmental experiences.10 3. cultural awareness 4. supporting the visited communities. Ecotourism is being used as a greenwash term in order to facilitate the privatisation of Tasmania’s National Parks (eg, Three Capes 2 Track, Cradle Mountain, Lake Malbena, Lake protected area authorities and Geeves, the South Coast and Frenchman’s owners to help support Cap). The Three Capes Track was the first cab management costs, and also off the rank; now it is being used as a model sustainable livelihood in both Tasmania and mainland States to put opportunities in local in private and government-funded
Recommended publications
  • Influence on the U.S. Environmental Movement

    Influence on the U.S. Environmental Movement

    Australian Journal of Politics and History: Volume 61, Number 3, 2015, pp.414-431. Exemplars and Influences: Transnational Flows in the Environmental Movement CHRISTOPHER ROOTES Centre for the Study of Social and Political Movements, School of Social Policy, Sociology and Social Research, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK Transnational flows of ideas are examined through consideration of Green parties, Friends of the Earth, and Earth First!, which represent, respectively, the highly institutionalised, the semi- institutionalised and the resolutely non-institutionalised dimensions of environmental activism. The focus is upon English-speaking countries: US, UK and Australia. Particular attention is paid to Australian cases, both as transmitters and recipients of examples. The influence of Australian examples on Europeans has been overstated in the case of Green parties, was negligible in the case of Friends of the Earth, but surprisingly considerable in the case of Earth First!. Non-violent direct action in Australian rainforests influenced Earth First! in both the US and UK. In each case, the flow of influence was mediated by individuals, and outcomes were shaped by the contexts of the recipients. Introduction Ideas travel. But they do not always travel in straight lines. The people who are their bearers are rarely single-minded; rather, they carry and sometimes transmit all sorts of other ideas that are in varying ways and to varying degrees discrepant one with another. Because the people who carry and transmit them are in different ways connected to various, sometimes overlapping, sometimes discrete social networks, ideas are not only transmitted in variants of their pure, original form, but they become, in these diverse transmuted forms, instantiated in social practices that are embedded in differing institutional contexts.
  • Iconic Lands: Wilderness As a Reservation Criterion for World Heritage

    Iconic Lands: Wilderness As a Reservation Criterion for World Heritage

    ICONIC LANDS Wilderness as a reservation criterion for World Heritage Mario Gabriele Roberto Rimini A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Environmental Studies University of New South Wales April 2010 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My gratitude goes to the Director of the Institute of Environmental Studies, John Merson, for the knowledge and passion he shared with me and for his trust, and to the precious advice and constant support of my co-supervisor, Stephen Fortescue. My family, their help and faith, have made this achievement possible. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I Introduction ………………………………………………………………………….…...…… 8 Scope and Rationale.………………………………………………………………………….…...…………. 8 Background…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 Methodology…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22 Structure…………………………………………………………………………………………………….... 23 CHAPTER II The Wilderness Idea ……………………………………………………………………........ 27 Early conceptions …………………………………………………………………………………………..... 27 American Wilderness: a world model …………………………………………………….....………………. 33 The Wilderness Act: from ideal to conservation paradigm …………………………………........…………. 43 The values of wilderness ……………………………………………………………………….…………… 48 Summary ………………………………………………………………………………………….…………. 58 CHAPTER III Wilderness as a conservation and land management category worldwide …………......... 61 The US model: wilderness legislation in Canada, New Zealand and Australia …………………………… 61 Canada: a wilderness giant ………………………………………………………………………..…...........
  • Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens

    Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens

    Senator Bob Brown - Australian Greens Bob Brown, born in 1944, was educated in rural New South Wales, became captain of Blacktown Boys High School in Sydney and graduated in medicine from Sydney University in 1968. He became the Director of the Wilderness Society which organised the blockade of the dam-works on Tasmania’s wild Franklin River in 1982/3. Some 1500 people were arrested and 600 jailed, including Bob Brown who spent 19 days in Risdon Prison. On the day of his release, he was elected as the first Green into Tasmania's Parliament. After federal government intervention, the Franklin River was protected in 1983. As a State MP, Bob Brown introduced a wide range of private member's initiatives, including for freedom of information, death with dignity, lowering parliamentary salaries, gay law reform, banning the battery-hen industry and nuclear free Tasmania. Some succeeded, others not. Regrettably, his 1987 bill to ban semi-automatic guns was voted down by both Liberal and Labor members of the House of Assembly, seven years before the Port Arthur massacre. In 1989, he led the parliamentary team of five Greens which held the balance of power with the Field Labor Government. The Greens saved 25 schools from closure, instigated the Local Employment Initiatives which created more than 1000 jobs in depressed areas, doubled the size of Tasmania's Wilderness World Heritage Area to 1.4 million hectares, created the Douglas-Apsley National Park and supported tough fiscal measures to recover from the debts of the previous Liberal regime. Bob resigned from the State Parliament in 1993 and Christine Milne took over as leader of the Tasmanian Greens.
  • The UTG Journal Issue No

    The UTG Journal Issue No

    The UTG Journal Issue No. 2 about the GST distribution (via Grants Commission) to Tasmania.2 With the forthcoming state elections another comment that Dick made, which is just as relevant today, Don’t be disturbed by silly arguments that the Editorial: Dick Jones U.T.G. kept so and so out of Parliament and aren’t we ashamed! (tut!) - The same Dr. Richard (Dick) Jones gave some very misleading argument is being used today; thought-provoking election speeches. For in fact, we have been lobbied by example, following his 1975 Senate Tasmanian Green supporters not to Election speech in an Editorial The reform as a political party. Examiner 1 commented that UTG had produced more ideas relevant to UTG has changed since the 1977 UTG Tasmania than have all the other parties State Conference, following 10 election combined. campaigns over 5 years (1972-77), Dick declared at this conference that: Our In this speech Dick pointed out that: business is to fight elections. Tasmania’s own party represents no sectional interests; (and) unlike some The fact that the newly re-formed UTG independents, we wear no disguises. has not formally re-registered as a political party does not mean we are not The United Tasmania Group became a political - we are even more so than political party because the two major before and, depending on the outcome of parties were putting aside democratic the next State election, we may register principles, in Tasmania. again, particularly as we now have The United Tasmania Group works financial backing. and breathes by a New Ethic, which The United Tasmania Group is Tasmania’s binds our members to work together (only) own party.
  • Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World

    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World

    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5
  • Dealing with Hung Parliaments

    Dealing with Hung Parliaments

    Chapter Four Dealing with Hung Parliaments The Honourable Michael Field My credentials to speak on this topic are that I was a member of the Tasmanian House of Assembly for more than twenty years, from 1976 until 1997, at various times serving as a minister, Leader of the Opposition and Premier of Tasmania. Especially relevant is that I was the Premier from 1989 to 1992 during the years of the “Labor Green Accord”. In 1989, in a 35-member House of Assembly, Labor won 13 seats, the Greens five seats and the Liberal Party 17 seats. Nearly three years later, under the threat of a No Confidence motion, the House of Assembly was dissolved and, in the subsequent election, Labor received just 28.9 per cent of the vote, the lowest vote Labor had received in Tasmania since 1910. Despite this thrashing, the remaining members of the Parliamentary Labor Party asked me to stay on as Leader of the Opposition. I saw my task as rebuilding our stocks, aiming to put us in a position to win majority government. In 1996, there was, indeed, a massive swing. Labor received more than 40 per cent of the vote. The Liberals continued to govern in a minority. This government was short-lived. In 1998, Labor won a majority under Jim Bacon’s leadership. I retired from the House of Assembly the following year. To put the context in which politics is conducted, I wish to describe some of the increasing pressures facing modern government. The biggest of these is coping with the speed of change.
  • The Lake Pedder Decision

    The Lake Pedder Decision

    Hrasky, S. , & Jones, M. J. (2016). Lake Pedder: Accounting, environmental decision-making, nature and impression management. Accounting Forum, 40(4), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.005 Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY-NC-ND Link to published version (if available): 10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.005 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the accepted author manuscript (AAM). The final published version (version of record) is available online via Elsevier at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2016.06.005. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ Lake Pedder: Accounting, Environmental Decision-Making, nature and impression management Sue Hrasky and Michael Jones University of Tasmania, University of Bristol Acknowledgements We wish to thank participants at the 15th Financial Reporting and Business Communication Conference, Bristol, July 2011, the 23rd International Congress on Social and Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR), St Andrews, September 2011 and the 10th CSEAR Australasian Conference, Launceston, December 2011, for their helpful comments and suggestions. My thanks also to Claire Horner for her help collecting data. Finally, I would like to thank Glen Lehman and an anonymous reviewer Corresponding Author Department of Accounting and Finance University of Bristol 8 Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1TN, UK Email: [email protected] Phone: +44 (0)117 33 18286 Lake Pedder: Accounting, Environmental Decision-Making, Nature and Impression Management Abstract This paper looks at the role of accounting in a major environmental infrastructural project the flooding of Lake Pedder in Tasmania in the 1960s.
  • The Rise of the Australian Greens

    The Rise of the Australian Greens

    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 22 September 2008, no. 8, 2008–09, ISSN 1834-9854 The rise of the Australian Greens Scott Bennett Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary The first Australian candidates to contest an election on a clearly-espoused environmental policy were members of the United Tasmania Group in the 1972 Tasmanian election. Concerns for the environment saw the emergence in the 1980s of a number of environmental groups, some contested elections, with successes in Western Australia and Tasmania. An important development was the emergence in the next decade of the Australian Greens as a unified political force, with Franklin Dam activist and Tasmanian MP, Bob Brown, as its nationally-recognised leader. The 2004 and 2007 Commonwealth elections have resulted in five Australian Green Senators in the 42nd Parliament, the best return to date. This paper discusses the electoral support that Australian Greens candidates have developed, including: • the emergence of environmental politics is placed in its historical context • the rise of voter support for environmental candidates • an analysis of Australian Greens voters—who they are, where they live and the motivations they have for casting their votes for this party • an analysis of the difficulties such a party has in winning lower house seats in Australia, which is especially related to the use of Preferential Voting for most elections • the strategic problems that the Australian Greens—and any ‘third force’—have in the Australian political setting • the decline of the Australian Democrats that has aided the Australian Greens upsurge and • the question whether the Australian Greens will ever be more than an important ‘third force’ in Australian politics.
  • Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: the Politics of the Periphery1

    Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: the Politics of the Periphery1

    in Ecopolitics: Thought and Action, Vol 1, No 1, 2000, pp. 53-71. Parliamentary Experiences of the Tasmanian Greens: The Politics of the Periphery1 i Kate Crowley ABSTRACT This paper reflects upon the green political trajectory in Tasmania from the founding in 1972 of the world's first green2 party, the United Tasmania Group, to the recent 'electoral reform’ that in effect disenfranchised most of the Tasmanian parliamentary greens (Crowley, 2000). It argues that green politics, whilst fundamentally transforming the island state of Tasmania in part through its nature conservation successes, has remained a politics at the periphery that is resisted by both the major parties. This peripheralisation is not entirely owed to the green's longstanding pursuit of wilderness preservation, however, but also to their preoccupation both with progressive politics and democratic accountability that has led them into state parliament where they have twice achieved the balance of power (Crowley, 1996; 1999b). This paper recounts familiar terrain with its description of Tasmania as a conservative, economically marginal island state that has pursued a development formula based upon resource exploitation and hydroindustrialisation that went unchallenged until the rise of the greens. It shows how Tasmania's green politics, perhaps unlike green politics in more vital, less marginal contexts, has been a politics of contrast and change, ecocentric to its core, but strategically concerned with broader social reformism. By considering the failure of both green minority governments (Labor-Green 1989-91; and Liberal-Green 1996-8), it further reinforces how much the major parties have resisted green efforts both to share the state political stage and to move more than rhetorically away from resource based developmentalism3.
  • Wilderness Karst in Tasmanian Resource Politics

    Wilderness Karst in Tasmanian Resource Politics

    WILDERNESS KARST IN TASMANIAN RESOURCE POLITICS by Kevin Kiernan Tasmanian Wilderness Society Until the early 1970s karst resources were largely un­ recognised in decisions regarding land-use in Tasmania. Over the past decade growing concern for the protection of the wilderness landscape of the island's south-west has stimulated the growth both of community based environmental interest groups and of protective agencies within the administrative machinery of government. Both have attracted individuals with expertise in karst and a personal committment to its proper management. Largely through their awareness and individual efforts, caves and karst have been promoted as little-known but worth­ while components of the wilderness. The positive results of this have included a stimulus to our knowledge of karst, an increase in public awareness of karst and a strengthening of the case for the prevention of the wilderness area. On the negative side, there may be some potentially dysfunctional consequences attached to the politicising of karst, including the loss of any "first strike" advantage which might otherwise have been available to karst advocates dealing with areas where it is a primary rather than subsidiary resource; and also the developmnent in some sectors of the community of an "anti-cave" ethos which might other­ wise not yet have arisen. Proceedings of 14th Conference of the ASF 1983 25 I WILDERNESS KARST IN TASMANIAN RESOURCE POLITICS KIERNAN INTRODUCTION The obj ect of this paper is to trace the nature of and changes in the management status over the past decade of one s.all co.ponent of the Tas.anian environ.ent : karst.
  • Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet

    Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet

    Tasmanian Heritage Register Datasheet 103 Macquarie Street (GPO Box 618) Hobart Tasmania 7001 Phone: 1300 850 332 (local call cost) Email: [email protected] Web: www.heritage.tas.gov.au Name: Oura Oura THR ID Number: 11875 Status: Permanently Registered Municipality: Northern Midlands Council Tier: State Location Addresses Title References Property Id 159 GULF RD, LIFFEY 7301 TAS 202805/1 6753804 Dr Bob Brown Wilderness Society Oura Oura and the Former dairy building, members with Dr Bob Cluan Tiers Oura Oura Bush Heritage Brown 1983 DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 Australia Wilderness Society Collection Former barn ('Jacob Verandah and front of Dr Bob Brown, Oura Shed'), Oura Oura house, Oura Oura Oura and Drys Bluff DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 DPIPWE 2018 Setting: Oura Oura has a picturesque location at the foot of Drys Bluff, a peak of the Great Western Tiers, at the southern end of the basaltic inner northern Tasmanian farmlands . The Upper Liffey River separates Gulf Road from the paddocks in front of the house. Behind the house, the forested slopes rise to the dolerite cliffs of the often snow-clad mountain. This setting, with the simple house dwarfed by a rugged peak, recalls the ‘Sublime’ artistic tradition favoured by Romantic artists and ‘wilderness’ photographers . A Drys Bluff walking track constructed by the Dean family and used regularly by Bob Brown climbs through the regrowth eucalypt forest of the Oura Oura Reserve. Description: Oura Oura is a simple L-shaped weatherboard Queen Anne Federation farm house built on a rise south of the Liffey River. It has a hipped and gable roof with front verandah, and modern red Colorbond roof sheeting.
  • Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania

    Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania

    Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania Prepared by the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Version: 1.5.4 September, 2010 Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Australia licence, except where otherwise noted. © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania, 2010 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, June 2010 1 Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania Contact details David Thorp Strategic Water Information Coordinator Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Phone: 03 6233 9648 Email: [email protected] Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, June 2010 2 Strategic Water Information and Monitoring Plan, Tasmania Acknowledgements The contribution of the following organisations in preparing this document is gratefully acknowledged: Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment, Hydro-electric Corporation (Hydro Tasmania), Hobart Bureau of Meteorology, Southern Water, Burnie City Council, Clarence City Council, Cradle Mountain Water, Devonport City Council, Ben Lomond Water, Forestry Tasmania, Glenorchy City Council, Hobart City Council, Huon Valley Council, Inland Fisheries Service, Launceston City Council, NRM Cradle Coast, NRM North, NRM South, Rivers & Water Supply Commission, and Onstream. Disclaimer: Whilst the Department has made every attempt to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information and data provided, it is the responsibility of the data user to make their own decisions about the accuracy, currency, reliability and correctness of information provided. The Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment, its employees and agents, and the Crown in the Right of the State of Tasmania do not accept any liability for any damage caused by, or economic loss arising from, reliance on this information.