Spatial Planning Versus Realized Construction in Bratislava: Zonal Planning, a Case Study Dúbravka

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spatial Planning Versus Realized Construction in Bratislava: Zonal Planning, a Case Study Dúbravka PP Periodica Polytechnica Spatial Planning versus Realized Architecture Construction in Bratislava: Zonal Planning, a Case Study Dúbravka 47(1), pp. 41-48, 2016 DOI: 10.3311/PPar.9421 Creative Commons Attribution b Peter Horák1* research article Received 03 May 2016; accepted 19 July 2016 Abstract 1 Broader context of the Bratislava development The article deals with the implications of the spatial planning For a better understanding and subsequent solution for the process in Bratislava, the capital of Slovakia. The article high- current urban problems, it is helpful to add some background lights the need for the formation of zonal plans as a possible to the development, factors and elements that formed the city. solution to the improvement of a certain territory regarding Such formation is better understood through case studies. In spatial planning. Bratislava, from the perspective of urban this way, different situations can be modelled using historical planning and design, is a diverse city representing a model for cross-sections, analysing the problems and factors affecting understanding the formation of the urban structure through them. The city of Bratislava is a good example for analysing various political and economic principles. The dynamics of the process of urban formation concerning both positive and the city’s development after the Second World War was condi- negative aspects. From the perspective of urban planning and tioned by new technological and prefabrication constructions, design, it is a diverse city, providing a varied urban structure and required new concepts for residential areas that could resulting from the implementation of different political and exceed the geographical barriers; specifically, the Danube economic principles. Its area, population, structure, and impact River and the Carpathian Mountains, thus enabling further of the construction of housing estates, make Bratislava an ideal development of the city. In this article, the Carpathian region example to illustrate the broader problems resulting from con- is presented by a case study of Dúbravka. To understand the struction of residential areas after the war. developmental process of this area, basic historical, economic, The city is located on the western border of Slovakia. The and technical factors are presented. The phases of the realised first elementary settlements were located here because of the construction and their comparison with spatial plans show the ford across the Danube River (Šášky, 1992). Trade routes impacts that affect the functioning of this city part and the city later used this ford and stimulated the development of the as a whole, to the current day. Positive and negative aspects, city. Another natural factor that formed city was the Carpathi- potential and new development ideas are described. The exist- ans, which by their terrain protected the settlement, but also ing current spatial plan and the relevant legislation take these restricted the development of urban structures in the later peri- aspects into account. The article critically evaluates the cur- ods (Hruška, 1961). rent spatial planning methods in the selected area. After the scientific and technological revolution, the city underwent continuous industrialization, prompting the further Keywords development of the city. Due to this industrialisation, Brati- spatial planning, mass housing, Bratislava, Dúbravka slava became one of the most important cities during Austria- Hungarian Empire (Šášky, 1992). In the second half of the 19th century, the city’s architecture was mainly influenced by Hun- garian, Austrian, Czech and partly German architects (Kusý, 1995). In the early 20th century, the most significant collabo- ration in the city´s development was linked with world qual- ity Czech architects (Kusý, 1971). According to Šášky (1992), the First World War period did not influence the development 1Department of Urban Design and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Architecture, of the city; however, the Second World War ended the natu- Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava ral architectural development of the city, which subsequently Námestie SLobody 19, 812 45, Bratislava broke up in the post-war era of the new regime, in architecture * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] known as socialist realism (Kusý 1975). Šášky (1992) claims Spatial Planning versus Realized Construction in Bratislava 2016 47 1 41 that Bratislava was the city of many nations. During the Second plans illustrated by the construction of housing estates (Kusý, World War, the city was occupied by Hungarians, who were 1975). The realization of progressively larger concepts, the lack violently moved away by the Czechoslovakian army. After this of a theoretical basis, elementary and rapid realization of con- act, the city population remained mostly Slovak and Czech. struction, failure to address the problems encountered, and the According to Kusý (1971), urban planning as a new scien- increasing economic pressure in the construction of civil facili- tific discipline in Slovakia started to be applied in the early ties and services, caused increasingly intolerable conditions for 20th century. However, the first urban visions of Bratislava, life in the mass housing areas (Moravčíková et al., 2011). when facing the existing situation, showed themselves to be Construction of social housing took place in Bratislava in unfeasible. This was due to several factors from two directions. the late 19th century. Since then, several smaller build urban From the perspective of the municipality and investors, the residential units have been constructed. Following the estab- main focus was on economic principles. Urban plans have thus lishment of the socialist regime, residential areas were started become unsuitable documents affecting previously unregulated on a previously unknown scale. This brought new problems. and freely designed construction. From the perspective of plan- Increasing pressure to satisfy the needs of housing forced ners, at that time engineers having mostly a geodetic education, the architects to rapid implementation, without the option to city planning was a vision beyond feasibility. In the pre-war adequately respond to both the architectural and urban situa- and the interwar period, the city was actively initiating the cre- tion (Moravčíková et al., 2011). Consequently, the problems of ation of urban and regulation plans, and urban studies. How- residential structures deepened from the establishment of the ever, they remained largely at a theoretical level for the reasons first large residential complexes in the 1950s to the termina- mentioned previously. The largest urban realizations were just tion of their construction in the mid-90s. Even then, providing architectural studies about the size of an urban block or several adequate conditions for dealing with the situation that occurred blocks. While architects were aware of the importance of the were not provided. The repetition and emergence of new prob- city planning, the system approach did not allow them to solve lems were on-going. problems on a city scale (Kusý, 1971). The first post-war plans reflected the eastern urban develop- According to Moravčíková et al. (2015), planning before the ment of Bratislava. New dynamics and the construction tech- First World War contained specific requirements from investors nologies, like prefabrication, required finding new residential regarding parcelling of lots and the public interest. After the areas on the other side of the River Danube and the Carpathi- establishment of socialism following the Second World War, ans. Examples of this development were laid in the master plan a basis for the realization of huge urban complexes was cre- of the city from the 1960s, which founded the current approach ated. The enhanced power of the state allowed for the vision of of mass housing areas, functional zoning and transportation. urban development on a previously impossible scale. Spatial Based on this plan, the international competition for Petržalka planning, at that time the “smerný plán” (directional plan), had (one of the largest communist housing estates) was announced. a sovereign status, which enabled the realization of huge urban The first comprehensive urban residential complex built concepts. However, the preparation of such a plan was long after the Second World War was the Krasňany.residential com- and could not quickly and sensitively respond to changes in the plex. The principles of the satellite belt town were applied to development of the city. Also, due to the economic situation this complex and other residential units (Jankovich, 1988). and the pressure from the state, the visions within the plans Amenities around the perimeter complement the characteristic could not be realized in all their extent. The development was thin line built-up area. This housing estate was built as the first therefore either mono-functional or specific. within the north-east urban development between 1955-1962 The change came after 1989. Following this, complex Social- (Moravčíková et al., 2011). ist urban plans had become unfeasible. New ownership rela- Next, mass housing areas appeared in both larger and tions arose, and much state land was privatised. This provided smaller forms, among which were widespread complexes such a fresh insight into spatial planning. New individual investors as Ružinov, Karlova Ves, Dúbravka and Petržalka (Fig. 1). and an active community entered
Recommended publications
  • AR Bratislava 2007 Ang.Indd
    CITY OF BRATISLAVA ANNUAL REPORT 2006 CITY OFBRATISLAVAC I TY O F ANNUAL REPORT 2006 20 20 ANNUAL REPORT 2006 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS CAPITAL CITY OF SR BRATISLAVA CONTENT Introduction Foreword by the Mayor 4 Bratislava: Mission, vision and development priorities 6 Local government 8 Internal affairs 12 Sections City planning and development 22 Environment 24 Transport 28 Construction 34 Heritage conservation 38 Culture, sport and free time 42 Education and youth 48 Social assistance 54 Public order 58 Tourism 66 International relations 72 Financial annual report Balance of income and expenses of the City of Bratislava for 2006 82 Formation and release of off-budget funds 86 Transfers 86 Overview of balance and development of debt 87 Business activities 87 Offsetting of financial relations to city budget 88 Arrangement of economic results of the City of Bratislava for 2006 89 Bratislava 2006 in figures 90 FOREWORD BY THE MAYOR For Bratislava and its local government the year 2006 was the last year in the four-year period of office, a year of municipal elections, and so naturally, also a year for taking stock of the Bratislava Development Priorities Programme. At the very beginning of this period, we did not exactly have it easy. When just before Christmas in 2002 I took over responsibility for the administration and future development of our city, Bratislava was a quarter of a billion in debt, which was due to be settled in the sum- mer of 2003, but with only one quarter of this amount available to cover it. In such an atmosphere it was not exactly the best of times to think about development constructions.
    [Show full text]
  • City Parks and Gardens the Forest in the City
    ZÁHORSKÁ BYSTRICA www.visitbratislava.com/green Lesopark DEVÍNSKA NOVÁ VES Cycling Bridge Malé Karpaty of Freedom 9 11 20 RAČA Morava 10 21 Devínska Kobyla 19 DÚBRAVKA LAMAČ VAJNORY LEGEND Vydrica 13 DEVÍN 12 1 Hviezdoslavovo námestie Devín 2 Šafárikovo námestie Castle 18 3 Medical Garden Danube IVANKA PRI DUNAJI 4 Grassalkovich Garden 5 Sad Janka Kráľa NOVÉ MESTO 6 Baroque Garden 8 KARLOVA VES 7 Botanical Garden EUROVELO 6 5 EUROVELO 13 8 Horský park Sad Janka Kráľa on the right bank statues depicting the 4 RUŽINOV VRAKUŇA A prominent landmark in the Koliba sec- summer bobsled track City Parks and Gardens 14 7 3 The Forest in the City of the Danube is the oldest public park zodiac signs, a gazebo STARÉ 9 Červený kríž tion of the forest park is Kamzík (439 with lift, treetop rope MESTO 6 10 Dlhé lúky 12 Take a break from the urban bustle and hustle and discover in Central Europe. It was established from the original Fran- EUROVELO 6 1 2 In just a few minutes find yourself in the silence of nature, meters) , whose television tower is course featuring 42 cozy, green corners right in the city center. in 1774-1776. The park has walkways ciscan church tower, 11 Kačín walking on forest roads and green meadows. perched on the peak of the ridge. Take in obstacles, World War I 16 5 shaded by trees and spacious mead- a playground with Pečniansky les 12 Koliba - Kamzík a panoramic view of the surrounding area era artillery bunker th 13 The history of these parks goes back to the 18 century, and today they are ows.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerstvo Životného Prostredia Slovenskej Republiky, Odbor
    sekcia environmentálneho hodnotenia a odpadového hospodárstva odbor posudzovania vplyvov na životné prostredie Námestie Ľudovíta Štúra 1, 812 35 Bratislava Ministerstvo životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, odbor posudzovania vplyvov na životné prostredie, ako ústredný orgán štátnej správy starostlivosti o životné prostredie podľa § 1 ods. 1 písm. a) a § 2 ods. 1 písm. c) zákona č. 525/2003 Z. z. o štátnej správe starostlivosti o životné prostredie a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení neskorších predpisov, ako správny orgán podľa § 1 ods. 2 zákona č. 71/1967 Zb. o správnom konaní (správny poriadok) v znení neskorších predpisov a ako príslušný orgán podľa § 3 písm. k) a § 54 ods. 2 písm. k) zákona č. 24/2006 Z. z. o posudzovaní vplyvov na životné prostredie a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení neskorších predpisov, na základe výsledkov procesu posudzovania vykonaného podľa ustanovení citovaného zákona vydáva podľa § 37 zákona č. 24/2006 Z. z. o posudzovaní vplyvov na životné prostredie a o zmene a doplnení niektorých zákonov v znení neskorších predpisov a podľa § 46 a § 47 zákona č. 71/1967 Zb. o správnom konaní (správny poriadok) v znení neskorších predpisov ZÁVEREČNÉ STANOVISKO (číslo: 363/2020-1.7/ak) I. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE O NAVRHOVATEĽOVI 1. Názov RED_DUBY s.r.o. (ďalej len „navrhovateľ“) 2. Identifikačné číslo 51 255 162 3. Sídlo Legionárska 10, 811 07 Bratislava II. ZÁKLADNÉ ÚDAJE O NAVRHOVANEJ ČINNOSTI 1. Názov KRD AREA PROJECT_komerčne „DUBY“ (ďalej len „navrhovaná činnosť“) 2. Účel Účelom navrhovanej činnosti je výstavba a prevádzka dvoch nadzemných výškových polyfunkčných objektov (bývanie, administratíva, obchod, služby) na podzemnej platforme pozostávajúcej z obchodného domu a hromadnej garáže na území existujúcich starých záhrad západne od Dúbravsko-karloveskej radiály na hranici mestských častí Bratislava – Karlova Ves a Bratislava - Dúbravka strana 2 záverečného stanoviska č.
    [Show full text]
  • Sleeping Suburbs of Bratislava
    „Sleeping“ suburbs of Bratislava How to support mixed use development in suburban residential areas • Mass housing estates Case study of Bratislava - Dúbravka • Suburban residential areas Case study of Bratislava – Záhorská Bystrica • Valid planning system in Slovakia Current issues Ing.arch. Oľga Melcerová, PhD. Faculty of Architecture STU Bratislava Location Slovakia: Bratislava: • area 49 035 km2 • capital of Slovakia since 1993 • 5,40 mil. inhabitants (30.6.2012) • area 367 km2 • 465 327 inhabitants (1.6.2012) 330 km 70 km 200 km Prefabricated housing estates Slovakia Mass housing estates: functionally and territorially autonomous residential areas of at least 300 flats Statistics: • construction in 50s-90s 1960 – 22 696 flats • large estates built in a short time 1970 – 30 690 flats (91% in prefabs) • 1,2 mil. flats in prefabs = 1/3 of all flats 1980 – 8 215 flats • 2 mil. inhabitants in prefabs 1995 – 6 209 flats Prefabricated construction: + fast and rather cheap - „crane urbanism“ - monotony, uniformity, bad orientation - low technical quality Technical – economic directions: + flats of good hygienic parameters - „rabbit hutches“ - small rooms, missing pantry or storage Complete housing construction: + planned public and sport facilities - late and reduced facilities construction + lost of recreational greenery - missing work opportunities + good public transport connection - lack of parking places Prefabricated housing estates Bratislava • 21 prefab estates built in 1955-95 • 1956: 1st mass housing estate • 1955-60: smaller estates
    [Show full text]
  • D4 Jarovce – Ivanka North
    GEOCONSULT, spol. s r.o. engineering - design and consulting company, Miletičova 21, P.O.Box 34, 820 05 Bratislava 25 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Protected areas in terms of water management According to Annex 1 to the Regulation of the Ministry of Agriculture of the Slovak Republic No. 211/2005 Coll. setting the list of significant water supply streams, the Danube and the Little Danube river are included in the list of significant water supply streams. Number Water flow significant for water management Number Name of hydrological border in the section (km) catchment area in the section (km) 69. Danube 4-20-01-001 - 1708.02-1850.2 and 1872.7-1880.2 72. Little Danube 4-20-01-010 all the section - 293. Šúrsky channel 4-21-15-005 all the section The Danube river with its system of branches represents the predominant factor in creation of the supplies and quality of ground water. The Danube gravel alluvia are a significant reservoir of ground water and they represent the biggest accumulation of ground water in Central Europe. The main source of ground water is the infiltrated water of the Danube, while the greatest sources of drinking water are located in the alluvial zone of the river. For the above reason, this territory is protected by law and it entire belongs to the significant water supply area of PWA (protected water area) Žitný ostrov. Protected water management area of Žitný ostrov has an area of nearly 1,400 km2, however, it represents only about 20% of the total area (about 7,000 km2) of all PWMA in Slovakia.
    [Show full text]
  • Devínska Kobyla Missile Base / Student Idea Competition Competition Conditions
    DEVÍNSKA KOBYLA MISSILE BASE / STUDENT IDEA COMPETITION COMPETITION CONDITIONS Missile base at the top of the Devínska Kobyla National Nature Reserve in Bratislava DEVÍNSKA KOBYLA MISSILE BASE / Student idea competition name of the competition Missile base at the top of the Devínska Kobyla National Nature Reserve in Bratislava goal/idea LIBRETO Devínska Kobyla is a mountain massif on the southwestern edge of Bratislava. Visually it dominates the western part of the city. It is connected with Devín Castle, the River Danube and the city districts of Devínska Nová Ves, Dúbravka, Karlova Ves and Lamač. From its summit you can see Bratislava, Austria and Hungary, and when there is good visibility the Czech Republic. Observation tower in the area of the missile base – a view of the River Danube Devín castle ruins – confluence of the Morava and Danube rivers View of Europe. The views from its summit have a symbolic meaning. As there was a military base in the past, the site was inaccessible to the public for many years. Today, visitors can move freely around the military base and the surrounding forests and enjoy freedom of movement and views. For older generations, it is a symbol of regained freedom and a symbol of a united Europe. Missile base. An air defence unit used the area to protect the “camp of socialism” from “imperialist aggressors”. Un- der socialism, the army was perceived negatively by ordinary people due to compulsory military service. Young men had to spend a year or two in barracks, separated from their families and friends, sometimes in very uncomfortable and indecent conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoznam Komunikácií Na Území Hlavného Mesta Sr Bratislavy
    HLAVNÉ MESTO SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY BRATISLAVA ZOZNAM KOMUNIKÁCIÍ NA ÚZEMÍ HLAVNÉHO MESTA SR BRATISLAVY Upozornenie: Zoznam komunikácií na území hlavného mesta SR Bratislavy má len informatívny charakter a nie je použiteľný pre právne úkony! Zoznam je priebežne aktualizovaný a dopĺňaný. Aktualizácia: máj 2021 Por.číslo Názov ulice Mestská časť Okres Trieda Poznámky 1 Alžbety Gwerkovej Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 2 Adámiho Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 III 3 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 nezaradená od ul. Na vrátkach po Saratovskú ul. 4 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 II od Saratovskej ul. po cestu II/505 5 Achátová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 6 Akvamarínová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 7 Aladára Radnótiho Rusovce Bratislava 5 nezaradená 8 Albánska Rača Bratislava 3 III 9 Albertova lávka Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 nezaradená lávka ponad Staromestskú ul. medzi Židovskou ul. a hradbmi 10 Albína Brunovského Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 nezaradená 11 Albrechtova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 12 Alejová Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 13 Alešova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 14 Alibernetová Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 nezaradená 15 Alstrova Rača Bratislava 3 III 16 Alviano Vajnory Bratislava 3 nezaradená 17 Alžbetínska Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 II 18 Amarelková Vrakuňa Bratislava 2 nezaradená 19 Ametystová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 20 Ambroseho Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 21 Ambrova Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 22 Ambrušova Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 23 Americká Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 24 Americké námestie Staré Mesto
    [Show full text]
  • MESTSKÁ Čast BRATISLAVA KARLOVA
    MESTSKÁ ÈASt BRATISLAVA KARLOVA VES Nám. sv. Františka 8, 842 62 Bratislava 4 È. j.: KV/SU/2002/201 6/21 867/KJ Bratislava 30.11.2016 ROZHODNUTIE Mestská čast‘ Bratislava Karlova Ves ako príslušný stavebný úrad (d‘alej stavebný úrad) podl‘a ustanovenia 117 ods. 1 zákona è. 50/1976 Zb. o územnom plánovaní a stavebnom poriadku (stavebný zákon) v znení neskorších predpisov (d‘alej stavebný zákon) a taktiež určený Okresným úradom Bratislava, odborom výstavby a bytovej politiky, oddelením štátnej stavebnej správy, listom È. OU-BA-OVBP2-2016/51583-FIC zo dňa 06.05.2016, na konanie podľa ustanovenia 119 ods. 1 stavebného zákona, v spojeni s ustanovením 5 písm. a) zákona è. 608/2003 Z. z. o štátnej správe pre územné plánovanie, stavebný poriadok a bývanie a o zmene a doplnení zákona è. 50/1976 Zb. o územnom plánovaní a stavebnom poriadku, v znení neskorších predpisov, v nadväznosti na ustanovenie 7a ods. 2 písm. i) zákona Slovenskej národnej rady è. 377/1990 Zb. o hlavnom meste Slovenskej republiky Bratislave v znení neskorších predpisov, (ďalej zákon o hlavnom meste) a èi. 67 štatútu hlavného mesta Bratislavy, v nadväznosti na ustanovenia * 2 písm. e) a 4 ods. 4 zákona è. 416/2001 Z. z. o prechode niektorých pósobností z orgánov štátnej správy na obce a vyššie územně celky v znení neskorších predpisov, zastúpená starostkou mestskej èasti v zmysle * 17 ods. 3 zákona o hlavnom meste SR Bratislavy, v konaní podľa ustanovenia 46 a 47 zákona è. 7 1/1967 Zb., o správnom konaní v znení neskorších predpisov (d‘alej správny poriadok), v súlade s ustanoveniami 66 stavebného zákona v spojení s ustanovením 10 vyhlášky è.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoznam Komunikácií Na Území Hlavného Mesta Sr Bratislavy
    HLAVNÉ MESTO SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY BRATISLAVA ZOZNAM KOMUNIKÁCIÍ NA ÚZEMÍ HLAVNÉHO MESTA SR BRATISLAVY Upozornenie: Zoznam komunikácií na území hlavného mesta SR Bratislavy má len informatívny charakter a nie je použiteľný pre právne úkony! Zoznam je priebežne aktualizovaný a dopĺňaný. Aktualizácia: február 2018 Por.číslo Názov ulice Mestská časť Okres Trieda Poznámky 1 A. Gwerkovej Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 2 Adámiho Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 III 3 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 nezaradená od ul. Na vrátkach po Saratovskú ul. 4 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 II od Saratovskej ul. po cestu II/505 5 Achátová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 6 Akvamarínová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 7 Aladára Radnótiho Rusovce Bratislava 5 nezaradená 8 Albánska Rača Bratislava 3 III 9 Albertova lávka Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 nezaradená lávka ponad Staromestskú ul. medzi Židovskou ul. a hradbmi 10 Albína Brunovského Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 nezaradená 11 Albrechtova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 12 Alejová Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 13 Alešova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 14 Alibernetová Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 nezaradená 15 Alstrova Rača Bratislava 3 III 16 Alviano Vajnory Bratislava 3 nezaradená 17 Alžbetínska Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 II 18 Amarelková Vrakuňa Bratislava 2 nezaradená 19 Ametystová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 20 Ambroseho Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 21 Ambrova Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 22 Ambrušova Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 23 Americká Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 24 Americké námestie Staré Mesto
    [Show full text]
  • Zoznam Komunikácií Na Území Hlavného Mesta Sr Bratislavy
    HLAVNÉ MESTO SLOVENSKEJ REPUBLIKY BRATISLAVA ZOZNAM KOMUNIKÁCIÍ NA ÚZEMÍ HLAVNÉHO MESTA SR BRATISLAVY Upozornenie: Zoznam komunikácií na území hlavného mesta SR Bratislavy má len informatívny charakter a nie je použite ľný pre právne úkony! Zoznam je priebežne aktualizovaný a dop ĺň aný. Aktualizácia: február 2020 Por.číslo Názov ulice Mestská časť Okres Trieda Poznámky 1 Alžbety Gwerkovej Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 2 Adámiho Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 III 3 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 nezaradená od ul. Na vrátkach po Saratovskú ul. 4 Agátová Dúbravka Bratislava 4 II od Saratovskej ul. po cestu II/505 5 Achátová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 6 Akvamarínová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 7 Aladára Radnótiho Rusovce Bratislava 5 nezaradená 8 Albánska Ra ča Bratislava 3 III 9 Albertova lávka Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 nezaradená lávka ponad Staromestskú ul. medzi Židovskou ul. a hradbmi 10 Albína Brunovského Karlova Ves Bratislava 4 nezaradená 11 Albrechtova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 12 Alejová Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 13 Alešova Ružinov Bratislava 2 III 14 Alibernetová Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 nezaradená 15 Alstrova Ra ča Bratislava 3 III 16 Alviano Vajnory Bratislava 3 nezaradená 17 Alžbetínska Staré Mesto Bratislava 1 II 18 Amarelková Vraku ňa Bratislava 2 nezaradená 19 Ametystová Podunajské Biskupice Bratislava 2 nezaradená 20 Ambroseho Petržalka Bratislava 5 III 21 Ambrova Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 22 Ambrušova Ružinov Bratislava 2 nezaradená 23 Americká Nové Mesto Bratislava 3 III 24 Americké námestie
    [Show full text]
  • MESTSKÁ ČASŤ BRATISLAVA-KARLOVA VES Nám
    MESTSKÁ ČASŤ BRATISLAVA-KARLOVA VES Nám. sv. Františka 8, 842 62 Bratislava 4 MIESTNY ÚRAD MESTSKEJ CASTI BR.K1 1'.i.L~Y.~~TARÉ MESTO DOŠLO DŇA: o1 -07- 2020 2 p odľa rozdeľovníka Vaše čís lo Naše č í s lo vybavuje / linka / mail Bratislava KV/ SÚ/495/2020/l 0928/ AF Anna Feketeová 22.06.2020 02 / 707 11 318 [email protected] Oznámenie o začatí územného konania Dňa 27.11.2018 obdržal stavebný úrad mestskej časti Bratislava - Karlova Ves návrh na vydanie územného rozhodnutia na líniovú telekomunikačnú stavbu: názov stavby: „FTTx_BA_BC_ Westend Crossing_2" miesto stavby: ulica Dúbravská cesta a Lamač ská cesta v Bratislave, pozeir~lcy CKN parcelné č. 2616/30, .2621/3, 2621/4, 2625/6, 2625/7, 2625/~ , 2627/35, 2627/40, 2627/41, katastrálne územie Karlova Ves a pozemky EKN parcelné č. 22307/1, katastrálne územie Karlova Ves a pozemky EKN parcelné č. 21634, katastrálne · „:-_ územie Staré Mesto; ...,.,,_ __ - ~- - navrhovateľ : Slovak Telekom, a.s., Bajkalská 28, 817 62 Bratislava, IČO: 35 763 469; v zastúpení: TOANDE SLOV AK.IA s.r.o„ Čajakova 18, 811 05 Bratislava, IČO: 35 702 249; druh stavby: novostavba; účel stavby: inžinierska stavba - podľa§ 43a ods. (3) písm. h) stavebného zákona - líniová telekomunikačná stavba; zodp. projektant: Ing. Tibor Ágh, autorizovaný stavebný inžinier, reg. č. 6485*14, Technické, technologické a energetické vybavenie stavieb, TOANDE SLOV AKIA s.r.o., Čajakova 18, 811 05 Bratislava, ktorý vypracoval projektovú dokumentáciu v termíne 06/2018. Stavba sa umiestňuje tak, ako je to zakreslené v situácii na podklade kópie katastrálnej mapy M = 1: 1500, ktorá je súčasťou tohto oznámenia.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Summary
    COST Action CA15206 Payments for Ecosystem Services (Forests for Water) © SACR 7th Working Group and Management Committee Meeting October 22 - 24 2019 Venue: Crowne Plaza Bratislava**** Main organiser and host of the event: Organising partners: Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering National Forest Centre, Slovakia Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra Technical University in Zvolen Dr. Attila Tóth University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, [email protected] Vienna, Austria Partners Nationalpark Donauauen – Danube Floodplains National Park, Austria Regional Association for Nature Conservation and Sustainable Development, Slovakia Contact: Dr. Attila Tóth, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, [email protected], +421 908 135 972 International Keynotes Dr. Pernille Holtedahl Prof. Dr. Shingo Shibata Blue Maia Ltd. Sophia University London, United Kingdom Tokyo, Japan Green bonds and other private financing vehicles Watershed PES and for investing in woodland Forest Environmental creation Taxes in Japan Keynote addresses on the national context (Slovakia and Austria): Prof. Dr. Jaroslav Šálka, Technical University in Zvolen Dr. Ivan Barka, National Forest Centre, Zvolen Dr. Gerhard Kuschnig, Magistrat der Stadt Wien, Wiener Wasser MA31 Venue: Bratislava (Crown Plaza Hotel) Bratislava is the capital of Slovakia, with more than 400 thousand inhabitants. It is located on the international borders to Austria and Hungary, and on one of the largest rivers in Europe – the Danube. The river Morava/March flows into the Danube at the border of the city and the border to Austria. The venue is centrally located, within walking distance to the most important landmarks of the historical urban landscape, including the urban riverfront of Danube.
    [Show full text]