Page Numbers in Boldfaced Type Indicate Illustrations. Abamectin, 748 Abdomen Structure, 83–84 Appendages, 59, 84–89 Embryon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Page Numbers in Boldfaced Type Indicate Illustrations. Abamectin, 748 Abdomen Structure, 83–84 Appendages, 59, 84–89 Embryon Index Page numbers in boldfaced type indicate illustrations. Abamectin, 748 Acheta Abdomen A. assimilis, circulatory system, 576 structure, 83–84 A. domesticus, 190, 190 appendages, 59, 84–89 Achilidae, 219 embryonic development, 608 Acoustic parasitism, 383 Abdominal epidermis, differentiation at Acrida,egg pod, 591 metamorphosis, 635 Acrididae, 186, 193 Abdominalganglia, 411 hearing, 380, 381 Abdominal gills, 480 Acridoidea, 185, 186, 191, 193–194 Absorption, 502–503 Acridomorpha, 187 of insecticides,502 Acroceridae, 255 Acalymma vittata, 324 Acron,60 Acalyptratae, 247, 256, 257–260 Acronycta rumicis, diapause induction, 673, 673 Acanthoscelides Acrosternite, 59 A. obtectus, 323, 324 Acrotergite, 59, 74, 83 as control agent, 324 Activating factor, 360, 362 Accessory hearts, 518 Activation center, 598, 599 Accessory pulsatile organs, 516, 518, 519, 520, Aculeata, 331, 333, 334, 335, 341–349 521 Acyrthosiphon pisum Accessory reproductive glands biocontrol, 773 embryonic origin, 612 as disease vector, 741 female host-plant resistance, 767 functions,565, 590–591 mycetocytes, 505 in Glossina, 616, 617 polyphenism, 668 structure, 565 Adelgidae, 219 male,507,541,565, 579 Adephaga, 307, 308, 309–310 functions, 568, 574, 580, 584, 585, 586 Aderidae, 322 hormonal control,580 Adiheterothripidae, 236 structure, 568 Adipohemocytes, 525–526 Acentropus, larvalgas exchange, 479 Adipokinetic hormone, 418, 419, 464 Acerentomidae, 119 Admirals, 291 Acerentomoidea, 119 Aedeagus, 87, 87 Acerella barberi, 118 Aedes,93 Acetophenone, 426 A. aegypti Acetylcholine, 413 anal papillae in larva, 551, 555 Acetylglucosamine, 358, 362, 505, diurnal rhythms of egg laying,665 524 endocrine control of egg development, 577,578 783 784 Aedes (Continued) Alary muscles, 517, 520 excretory products, 543 embryonic origin, 612 Index hearinginmales, 380 Alderflies, 297, 298, 299 hemolymph osmotic pressure, 548 Aldrin, 508, 747 hormonal control of larval salt and water balance, Alena, 300 555 Aleurocanthus woglumi, 746 vitellogenesis, 578 biocontrol, 758 A. atropalpus Aleurodidae, 213, 215 vitellogenesis, 578 Aleurodoidea, 213, 215 A. canadiensis, 250 Aleurothrixus floccosus, biocontrol, 759 A. detritus Aleyrodidae, 215 hemolymph osmotic pressure, 548 Alfalfa weevil: see Hypera postica osmoregulation, 552 Alienicolae, 667 A. taeniorhynchus Alimentary canal osmoregulation, 552, 553 physiology, 496–503 absorption of amino acids, 503 structure, 489–496, 490 as disease vector, 738 Alinotum, 73, 74, 453 egg diapause, 618 Alkaloids, 295 glycogen, 503 as feeding deterrents, 488, 695 midgut regional differentiation, 495–496 Allantoic acid, 541, 543 Aegiale hesperiaris, as human food,733 Allantoin, 541, 543, 545 Aeolothripidae, 235–236 Allatostatic hormone, 418,578, 640 Aeropyles, 572 Allatotropic hormone, 418, 430, 578, 640, 643 Aeshna Allelochemicals, 421 A. cyanea Allomones, 421, 427, 429–430 hemolymph composition, 522–523 Alsophila pometaria, 289, 729 larval excretory products, 542 Alticinae, 324 diffusion of oxygen to flight muscles, 475 Alucitidae, 287 distance perception, 395 Alucitoidea, 287 Aeshnidae, 143 Alydidae, 230 Aeshnoidea, 143 Amblycera, 203, 204, 205, 206–207 Agaonidae, 340 Ambrosia beetles: see Scolytinae Agasicles hygrophila, as control agent, 324 American cockroach: see Periplaneta americana Agathiphaga, 280 Ametabola, 13, 98, 113 Agathiphagidae, 280 Amino acids Agathiphagoidea, 280 absorption, 502 Agglutinins: see Lectins as excretory products, 541 Aggregation pheromones, 424, 425–426 in hemolymph, 523 Aggression songs, 582 metabolism, 506 Aglossata, 279, 280 as phagostimulants, 488 Agriotes mancus, 316 Amitermes,171 Agrius, 294 A. hastatus, 172 Agromyza frontella, biocontrol, 759 Amitus spp., as control agents, 758, 795 Agromyzidae, 258 Ammonia, 539, 541, 543, 545, 550 Agromyzoidea, 258 Amnion, 605, 606 Agrotis, 294 Amniotic cavity,605–606 A. infusa, 732 Amniotic fluid, 619 as human food, 731 Amniotic folds, 605, 606 A. ipsilon,asr pest type, 744 Amorphoscelidae, 159, 162 A. orthogonia, 295 Amphibicorisae, 213 Agrypon flaveolatum,ascontrol agent, 729, Amphicerus hamatus, 319 759 Amphientomidae, 201, 202 Agulla, 300 Amphiesmenoptera, 43, 239, 279 A.adnixa, 300 Amphipneustic condition, 470 Ahuahutle, 733 Amphipsocidae, 202 Air sacs, 470, 472, 478 Amphipterygidae, 138 Alarm pheromones, 426–427 Anabrus simplex: see Mormon cricket Anacridium aegyptium,reproductive diapause, larva and pupa, 250 785 574–575 pathogenic bacteria, 715 Anagasta kuhniella¨ Anoplotermes, 171 Index male reproductive organs, 566 Anoplura, 97, 98, 203, 204, 205, 206, as parasitoid host, 710 208–209 pupal heartbeat rate, 521 Anormenis septentrionalis, 220 spacing pheromone, 428, 429 Ant crickets, 190 Anagyrus nr. kivuensis,as control agent, 758 Antarctoperlaria, 149 Anajapygidae, 121 Anteclypeus, 63 Anajapyx, 121 Antecostae, 59, 73, 83 A. vesiculosus, 120 Antecostal sulcus,59 Anal angle, 82 Antennae, 60, 63, 64, 64, 65 Anal gills, ion uptake, 551 Antennal lobes, 410 Anal margin, 82 Antennal sclerite,64 Anal papillae, 89, 552 Antennal segment, 60 hormonal control of sodium uptake, 555 Antennal sulcus, 62 ion uptake, 551 Anterior cervical sclerites, 63 Anal veins, 81 Anterior mediavein, 81 Analogy,96 Anterior notal process, 73, 453, 458 Anamorphosis, 113, 119 Anterior tentorial arms, 63 Anaphes flavipes, as control agent, 759 Anterior tentorial pits, 62 Anapterygota, 98 Antheraea, 293 Anasa tristis, 230, 231 A. pernyi Anastrepha ludens, genetic control, 766 hormonal control of eclosion, 643–644 Anatrepsis, 602, 604,606, 618 pupal diapause, 669 Anax,93 Anthocoridae, 228 A. imperator Anthomyiidae, 260 diapause induction, 673 Anthonomus, 324 A. junius A. grandis, 324 compound eye resolution, 394 adult diapause, 669 Andrena, 348 genetic control, 766 diurnal segregation, 708 male sex attractant, 424 Andreninae, 348 Anthophorinae, 349 Androconia, 277 Anthrenus, 318 Androgenic hormone, 420 A. scrophulariae, 318 Angel insects, 195 Anthribiidae, 324–325 Angumois grain moth, 284 Antibacterial peptides, 527, 531, 532, 533, 565, Anisembiidae, 156 637 Anisolabididae, 178 Antibiosis, 767 Anisomorpha buprestoides, 181 Anticarsia gemmatalis, viral control, 761 Anisoplia austriaca, microbial control, 716 Antidiuretic hormones, 554, 555 Anisopodidae, 249 Antifreeze proteins, 659, 660, 661 Anisops, 226 Antigonadotropic hormone, 421, 569, 575, 579 Anisoptera, 36, 37, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, Antixenosis, 767 143–144 Antlike stone beetles, 313 larval swimming,452 Antlions, 301, 304, 305 Anisotomidae, 313 Antliophora, 43, 239 Anisozygoptera, 140 Antonina graminis, biocontrol, 759 Annuli,64, 362, 472 Ants, 330, 342–345 Annulipalpia, 270, 271–272 castes, 342–344, 344, 345 Anobiidae, 318 fungus gardens, 502 cellulase, 499 mutualism withhomopterans, 344, 711, 711 Anobium punctatum, 318 spectral sensitivity, 396 Ano-jugal area, 82 See also Formicidae Anopheles Aonidiella aurantii,parasitoids, 705 A. quadrimaculatus, 250 Aorta,515, 519 as disease vector, 738 embryonic origin, 611 786 Apanteles Apomorphy, 96 A. cajae, 338 Apophyses, 59 Index as control agent, 339 Apoptosis, 641 A. melanoscelus Aposematic coloration, 295, 697, 709 host acceptance, 710 Appendages Apatelodidae, 293 abdomen, 84–89 Aphaniptera, 264 embryonic development, 635–637 Aphelinidae, 341 head,64–72 as control agents, 758, 759 postembryonic development, 635–637 Aphelinus mali, 341 thorax, 75–83 Aphelocheirus,plastron, 482, 483 Applemaggot fly: see Rhagoletis pomonella Aphididae, 217–218 Apple sucker, 215 Aphidius smithi, as control agent, 773 Appletwig borer, 319 Aphidoidea, 211, 213, 216–219 Apposition image, 393 Aphids, 211, 217 Aptera, 97 avoidance of toxins in food plants, 696 Apteropanorpa tasmanica, 243 paedogenesis, 617 Apteropanorpidae, 240, 243 as plant-disease vectors, 212, 741, 742 Apterygogenea, 98, 99 pseudoplacental viviparity, 615 Apterygota, 13, 98, 113 saliva, 491 Aquatic insects symbiotic bacteria, 211, 505 factors affecting distribution, 677– wing polymorphism, 645–647 678 Aphis osmoregulation, 550–554, 532, 677 A. craccivora Arachnida, 6, 7–8, 16, 18, 97 as disease vector, 741 Arachnomorpha, 19 host-plant resistance, 767 Aradidae, 229 A. fabae Aradoidea, 229 as disease vector, 741 Aradus acutus, 229 polymorphism, 646 Araecerus fasciculatus, 325 as r pest type, 744 Araschnia levana, seasonaldimorphism, Aphrophora, ocellus, 399 667 Aphrophoridae, 220 Archaeolepis mane,279 Aphytis spp. Archeognatha, 25, 122 as control agents, 758, 759 Archescytinidae, 38, 213 interspecific competitive exclusion, 705–706, Archidermaptera, 177 706, 707 Archiperlaria, 149 spatial segregation, 706 Archips argyrospilus, control, 772 Apical angle, 82 Archipsocidae, 202 Apical cell, 567 Archizygoptera, 36, 140 Apical margin, 82 Archodonata, 35 Apicotermes, l71 Archostemata, 308–309 Apicotermitinae, 171 Arctic insects, activity,657 Apidae, 347–349 Arctiidae, 295 Apinae, 349 Arctoperlaria, 148, 149–153 Apini, 349 Arctotypus, 35 Apionidae, 325 Argentine ant: see Iridomyrmex humilis Apis, 349 Argidae, 335 A. mellifera: see Honey bee Arixenia, 177, 177 Aplomyiopsis epilachnae, 262 Arixeniina, 176, 177 Apneustic condition, 470 Armored scales, 216 Apocrita, 44, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 337–349 Army ants, 344 Apodemes, 59 Armyworms, 294 Apoidea, 332, 334, 342, 347–349 Arolium, 76, 77 Apolysial membrane, 363 Arrestant pheromones, 583 Apolysis, 362, 365 Artematopidae, 316 of embryonic cuticle at hatching, 619 Artematopoidea, 316 in pupa, 632 Arthropleona, 114, 115, 116 Arthropods Axymyiidae, 248 787 evolutionary relationships, 14–21 Axymyiomorpha, 248 features,3 Aysheaia
Recommended publications
  • New Data on the Whiteflies (Insecta: Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) of Montenegro, Including Three Species New for the Country
    Acta entomologica serbica, 2015, 20: 29-41 UDC 595.754(497.16)"2012" DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.44654 NEW DATA ON THE WHITEFLIES (INSECTA: HEMIPTERA: ALEYRODIDAE) OF MONTENEGRO, INCLUDING THREE SPECIES NEW FOR THE COUNTRY CHRIS MALUMPHY1, SANJA RADONJIĆ2, SNJEŽANA HRNČIĆ2 and M ILORAD RAIČEVIĆ2 1 The Food and Environment Research Agency, Sand Hutton, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] 2 Biotechnical Faculty of the University of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro Abstract Collection data on nine species of whitefly collected in the coastal and central regions of Montenegro during October 2012 are presented. Three species are recorded from Montenegro for the first time: Aleuroclava aucubae (Kuwana), Aleurotuba jelinekii (Frauenfeld) and Bemisia afer (Priesner & Hosny) complex. Two of the species, A. aucubae and B. afer complex were found in Tološi, on Citrus sp. and Laurus nobilis, respectively. Aleurotuba jelinekii was found in Podgorica on Viburnum tinus. KEY WORDS: Whiteflies, Aleyrodidae, Montenegro Introduction Whiteflies comprise a single family, Aleyrodidae, which currently contains 1556 extant species in 161 genera (Martin & Mound, 2007). Fifty-six species occur outdoors in Europe and the Mediterranean basin (Martin et al., 2000). All whiteflies are phytophagous and have three developmental stages: egg, larval (with four larval instars) and adult. Many species are economically important plant pests of outdoor crops, ornamentals and indoor plantings. Feeding by immature whiteflies reduces plant vigor by depletion of plant sap, and foliage becomes contaminated with eliminated honeydew on which black sooty mold grows, thereby reducing the photosynthetic area and lowering the aesthetic appearance of ornamentals. Adults of a small number of species, most notably Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), are important vectors of plant viruses (Jones, 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera
    Insect Orders V: Panorpida & Hymenoptera • The Panorpida contain 5 orders: the Mecoptera, Siphonaptera, Diptera, Trichoptera and Lepidoptera. • Available evidence clearly indicates that the Lepidoptera and the Trichoptera are sister groups. • The Siphonaptera and Mecoptera are also closely related but it is not clear whether the Siponaptera is the sister group of all of the Mecoptera or a group (Boreidae) within the Mecoptera. If the latter is true, then the Mecoptera is paraphyletic as currently defined. • The Diptera is the sister group of the Siphonaptera + Mecoptera and together make up the Mecopteroids. • The Hymenoptera does not appear to be closely related to any of the other holometabolous orders. Mecoptera (Scorpionflies, hangingflies) • Classification. 600 species worldwide, arranged into 9 families (5 in the US). A very old group, many fossils from the Permian (260 mya) onward. • Structure. Most distinctive feature is the elongated clypeus and labrum that together form a rostrum. The order gets its common name from the gential segment of the male in the family Panorpodiae, which is bulbous and often curved forward above the abdomen, like the sting of a scorpion. Larvae are caterpillar-like or grub- like. • Natural history. Scorpionflies are most common in cool, moist habitats. They get the name “hangingflies” from their habit of hanging upside down on vegetation. Larvae and adult males are mostly predators or scavengers. Adult females are usually scavengers. Larvae and adults in some groups may feed on vegetation. Larvae of most species are terrestrial and caterpillar-like in body form. Larvae of some species are aquatic. In the family Bittacidae males attract females for mating by releasing a sex pheromone and then presenting the female with a nuptial gift.
    [Show full text]
  • EPPO Reporting Service, 1996, No. 2
    EPPO Reporting Service Paris, 1996-01-02 Reporting Service 1996, No. 02 CONTENTS 96/021 - EPPO Electronic Documentation Service 96/022 - Situation of Burkholderia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum in France and Portugal 96/023 - Fireblight foci in Puy-de-Dôme (FR) 96/024 - Toxoptera citricida found in Florida (US) 96/025 - Hyphantria cunea found in Tessin (CH) 96/026 - Bactrocera dorsalis trapped in California and Florida (US) 96/027 - Anastrepha ludens trapped in California (US) 96/028 - Further spread of Maconellicoccus hirsutus in the Caribbean 96/029 - Tilletia controversa is not present in Germany 96/030 - Present situation of citrus tristeza closterovirus in Spain 96/031 - Citrus whiteflies in Spain 96/032 - Proposed names for citrus greening bacterium and lime witches' broom phytoplasma 96/033 - Report of phytoplasma infection in European plums in Italy 96/034 - Susceptibility of potato cultivars to Synchytrium endobioticum 96/035 - Specific ELISA detection of the Andean strain of potato S carlavirus 96/036 - NAPPO quarantine lists for potato pests 96/037 - Studies on the possible use of sulfuryl fluoride fumigation against Ceratocystis fagacearum 96/038 - Treatments of orchid blossoms against Thrips palmi and Frankliniella occidentalis 96/039 - Soil solarization to control Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis 96/040 - Metcalfa pruinosa: a new pest in Europe 96/041 - Phytophthora disease of common alder 96/042 - Potential spread of Artioposthia triangulata (New Zealand flatworm) and Australoplana sanguinea var. alba to continental Europe EPPO Reporting Service 96/021 EPPO Electronic Documentation Service EPPO Electronic Documentation is a new service developed by EPPO to make documents available in electronic form to EPPO correspondents.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada
    Newsletter of the Biological Survey of Canada Vol. 40(1) Summer 2021 The Newsletter of the BSC is published twice a year by the In this issue Biological Survey of Canada, an incorporated not-for-profit From the editor’s desk............2 group devoted to promoting biodiversity science in Canada. Membership..........................3 President’s report...................4 BSC Facebook & Twitter...........5 Reminder: 2021 AGM Contributing to the BSC The Annual General Meeting will be held on June 23, 2021 Newsletter............................5 Reminder: 2021 AGM..............6 Request for specimens: ........6 Feature Articles: Student Corner 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Shawn Abraham: New Student 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, Liaison for the BSC..........................7 by Greg Pohl......................14 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemeroptera: Ephemeridae): an 2. Arthropod Survey at Fort Ellice, MB important food source for adult by Robert E. Wrigley & colleagues walleye in NW Ontario lakes, by A. ................................................18 Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Project Updates New book on Staphylinids published Student Corner by J. Klimaszewski & colleagues......11 New Student Liaison: Assessment of Chironomidae (Dip- Shawn Abraham .............................7 tera) of Far Northern Ontario by A. Namayandeh & D. Beresford.......11 Mayflies (mainlyHexagenia sp., Ephemerop- New Project tera: Ephemeridae): an important food source Help GloWorm document the distribu- for adult walleye in NW Ontario lakes, tion & status of native earthworms in by A. Ricker-Held & D.Beresford................8 Canada, by H.Proctor & colleagues...12 Feature Articles 1. City Nature Challenge Bioblitz Tales from the Field: Take me to the River, by Todd Lawton ............................26 2021-The view from 53.5 °N, by Greg Pohl..............................14 2.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT MITCHELL III, ROBERT DRAKE. Global Human Health
    ABSTRACT MITCHELL III, ROBERT DRAKE. Global Human Health Risks for Arthropod Repellents or Insecticides and Alternative Control Strategies. (Under the direction of Dr. R. Michael Roe). Protein-coding genes and environmental chemicals. New paradigms for human health risk assessment of environmental chemicals emphasize the use of molecular methods and human-derived cell lines. In this study, we examined the effects of the insect repellent DEET (N, N-diethyl-m-toluamide) and the phenylpyrazole insecticide fipronil (fluocyanobenpyrazole) on transcript levels in primary human hepatocytes. These chemicals were tested individually and as a mixture. RNA-Seq showed that 100 µM DEET significantly increased transcript levels for 108 genes and lowered transcript levels for 64 genes and fipronil at 10 µM increased the levels of 2,246 transcripts and decreased the levels for 1,428 transcripts. Fipronil was 21-times more effective than DEET in eliciting changes, even though the treatment concentration was 10-fold lower for fipronil versus DEET. The mixture of DEET and fipronil produced a more than additive effect (levels increased for 3,017 transcripts and decreased for 2,087 transcripts). The transcripts affected in our treatments influenced various biological pathways and processes important to normal cellular functions. Long non-protein coding RNAs and environmental chemicals. While the synthesis and use of new chemical compounds is at an all-time high, the study of their potential impact on human health is quickly falling behind. We chose to examine the effects of two common environmental chemicals, the insect repellent DEET and the insecticide fipronil, on transcript levels of long non-protein coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in primary human hepatocytes.
    [Show full text]
  • BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)
    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Softwood Insect Pests
    Forest & Shade Tree Insect & Disease Conditions for Maine A Summary of the 2011 Situation Forest Health & Monitoring Division Maine Forest Service Summary Report No. 23 MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION March 2012 Augusta, Maine Forest Insect & Disease—Advice and Technical Assistance Maine Department of Conservation, Maine Forest Service Insect and Disease Laboratory 168 State House Station, 50 Hospital Street, Augusta, Maine 04333-0168 phone (207) 287-2431 fax (207) 287-2432 http://www.maine.gov/doc/mfs/idmhome.htm The Maine Forest Service/Forest Health and Monitoring (FH&M) Division maintains a diagnostic laboratory staffed with forest entomologists and a forest pathologist. The staff can provide practical information on a wide variety of forest and shade tree problems for Maine residents. Our technical reference library and insect collection enables the staff to accurately identify most causal agents. Our website is a portal to not only our material and notices of current forest pest issues but also provides links to other resources. A stock of information sheets and brochures is available on many of the more common insect and disease problems. We can also provide you with a variety of useful publications on topics related to forest insects and diseases. Submitting Samples - Samples brought or sent in for diagnosis should be accompanied by as much information as possible including: host plant, type of damage (i.e., canker, defoliation, wilting, wood borer, etc.), date, location, and site description along with your name, mailing address and day-time telephone number or e-mail address. Forms are available (on our Web site and on the following page) for this purpose.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Are Specialist Predators of Snails
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 145–150, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.016 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Larvae of the water scavenger beetle, Hydrophilus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) are specialist predators of snails TOSHIO INODA1, YUTA INODA1 and JUNE KATHYLEEN RULLAN 2 1 Shibamata 5-17-10, Katsushika, Tokyo 125-0052, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilus acuminatus, feeding preferences, snail specialist Abstract. Hydrophilus acuminatus larvae are known to feed on aquatic prey. However, there is no quantitative study of their feeding habits. In order to determine the feeding preferences and essential prey of larvae of H. acuminatus, both field and laboratory experi- ments were carried out. Among the five potential species of prey,Austropeplea ollula (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae), Physa acuta (Mollusca: Physidae), Asellus hilgendorfi (Crustacea: Asellidae), Palaemon paucidens (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) and larvae of Propsilocerus akamusi (Insecta: Chironomidae), the first instar larvae of H. acuminatus strongly prefered the Austropeplea and Physa snails in both cafeteria and single-prey species experiments. Larvae that were provided with only snails also successfully developed into second instar larvae, while larvae fed Palaemon, Propsilocerus larvae or Asellus died during the first instar. In addition, the size of adult H. acuminatus reared from first-instar larvae and fed only snails during their entire development was not different from that of adult H. acuminatus collected in the field. This indicates that even though the larvae ofH. acuminatus can feed on several kinds of invertebrates, they strongly prefer snails and without them cannot complete their development.
    [Show full text]
  • American Serpentine Leaf Miner CP
    Liriomyza trifolii Contingency Plan Prepared for Horticulture Innovation Australia, as part of Project MT16004 (RD&E program for control, eradication and preparedness for vegetable leafminer) Rohan Burgess 1, Dr. Peter Ridland 2, Dr. Elia Pirtle 3 1 Plant Health Australia 2 The University of Melbourne 3 Cesar Australia December 7, 2020 This resource has been funded by Horticulture Innovation, through the Project MT16004 (RD&E program for control, eradication and preparedness for vegetable leafminer), using multiple research and development levies and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. AMERICAN SERPENTINE LEAFMINER CONTINGENCY PLAN CONTINGENCY PLAN AMERICAN SERPENTINE LEAFMINER (LIRIOMYZA TRIFOLII) Central Science Laboratory, Harpenden, British Crown, Central Science Laboratory, Harpenden, British Crown, Bugwood.org Bugwood.org December 2020 This resource has been funded by Horticulture Innovation, through the Project MT16004 (RD&E program for control, eradication and preparedness for vegetable leafminer), using multiple research and development levies and contributions from the Australian Government. Hort Innovation is the grower-owned, not-for-profit research and development corporation for Australian horticulture. AMERICAN SERPENTINE LEAFMINER CONTINGENCY PLAN This Contingency Plan has been authored by Rohan Burgess (Plant Health Australia), Dr. Peter Ridland (The University of Melbourne) and Dr. Elia Pirtle (Cesar Australia), with contributions from Dr. Sharyn Taylor (Plant Health Australia), Dr. James Maino (Cesar Australia), and Dr. Paul Umina (Cesar Australia). Disclaimer The scientific and technical content of this document is current to the date published and all efforts have been made to obtain relevant and published information on these pests.
    [Show full text]
  • Bugs & Beasties of the Western Rhodopes
    Bugs and Beasties of the Western Rhodopes (a photoguide to some lesser-known species) by Chris Gibson and Judith Poyser [email protected] Yagodina At Honeyguide, we aim to help you experience the full range of wildlife in the places we visit. Generally we start with birds, flowers and butterflies, but we don’t ignore 'other invertebrates'. In the western Rhodopes they are just so abundant and diverse that they are one of the abiding features of the area. While simply experiencing this diversity is sufficient for some, as naturalists many of us want to know more, and in particular to be able to give names to what we see. Therein lies the problem: especially in eastern Europe, there are few books covering the invertebrates in any comprehensive way. Hence this photoguide – while in no way can this be considered an ‘eastern Chinery’, it at least provides a taster of the rich invertebrate fauna you may encounter, based on a couple of Honeyguide holidays we have led in the western Rhodopes during June. We stayed most of the time in a tight area around Yagodina, and almost anything we saw could reasonably be expected to be seen almost anywhere around there in the right habitat. Most of the photos were taken in 2014, with a few additional ones from 2012. While these creatures have found their way into the lists of the holiday reports, relatively few have been accompanied by photos. We have attempted to name the species depicted, using the available books and the vast resources of the internet, but in many cases it has not been possible to be definitive and the identifications should be treated as a ‘best fit’.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: an Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C
    Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C. Barnard Index More information Index This index includes all the higher taxonomic categories mentioned in the book, from orders down to families, but page numbers are given only for the main occurrences of those names. It therefore also acts as a complete alphabetic list of the higher taxa of British insects and arachnids (except for the numerous families of mites). Acalyptratae 173, 188 Anyphaenidae 327 Acanthosomatidae 55 Aphelinidae 198, 293, 308 Acari 320, 330 Aphelocheiridae 55 Acartophthalmidae 173, 191 Aphididae 56, 62 Acerentomidae 23 Aphidoidea 56, 61 Acrididae 39 Aphrophoridae 56 Acroceridae 172, 180, 181 Apidae 198, 217 Aculeata 197, 206 Apioninae 83, 134 Adelgidae 56, 62, 64 Apocrita 197, 198, 206, 227 Adelidae 146 Apoidea 198, 214 Adephaga 82, 91 Arachnida 320 Aderidae 83, 126, 127 Aradidae 55 Aeolothripidae 52 Araneae 320, 326 Aepophilidae 55 Araneidae 327 Aeshnidae 31 Araneomorphae 327 Agelenidae 327 Archaeognatha 21, 25, 26 Agromyzidae 173, 188, 193 Arctiidae 146, 162 Alexiidae 83 Argidae 197, 201 Aleyrodidae 56, 67, 68 Argyronetidae 327 Aleyrodoidea 56, 66 Arthropleona 22 Alucitidae 146 Aschiza 173, 184 Alucitoidea 146 Asilidae 172, 180, 181, 182 Alydidae 55, 58 Asiloidea 172, 181 Amaurobiidae 327 Asilomorpha 172, 180, 182 Amblycera 48 Asteiidae 173, 189 Anisolabiidae 41 Asterolecaniidae 56, 70 Anisopodidae 172, 175, 177 Atelestidae 172, 183, 185 Anisopodoidea 172 Athericidae 172, 181 Anisoptera 31 Attelabidae 83, 134 Anobiidae 82, 119 Atypidae 327 Anoplura 48 Auchenorrhyncha 54, 55, 59 Anthicidae 83, 90, 126 Aulacidae 198, 228 Anthocoridae 55, 57, 58 Aulacigastridae 173, 192 Anthomyiidae 173, 174, 186, 187 Anthomyzidae 173, 188 Baetidae 28 Anthribidae 83, 88, 133, 134 Beraeidae 142 © Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 0521632412 - Identifying British Insects and Arachnids: An Annotated Bibliography of Key Works Edited by Peter C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use and Exchange of Biological Control Agents for Food and Agriculture
    BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 October 2009 E COMMISSION ON GENETIC RESOURCES FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE THE USE AND EXCHANGE OF BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENTS FOR FOOD AND AGRICULTURE by Matthew J.W. Cock, Joop C. van Lenteren, Jacques Brodeur, Barbara I.P.Barratt, Franz Bigler, Karel Bolckmans, Fernando L. Cônsoli, Fabian Haas, Peter G. Mason, José Roberto P. Parra 1 This document has been prepared at the request of the Secretariat of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture by the Global Commission on Biological Control and Access and Benefit-Sharing of the International Organisation for Biological Control of Noxious Animals and Plants (IOBC), as a contribution to the cross-sectoral theme, Consideration of policies and arrangements for access and benefit-sharing for genetic resources for food and agriculture , which the Commission will consider at its Twelfth Regular Session. The content of this document is entirely the responsibility of the authors, and does not necessarily represent the views of the FAO, or its Members. 1 For affiliation of the authors see Annex 2. BACKGROUND STUDY PAPER NO. 47 i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS PUBLICATION .................................................................................................................1 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]