DOCSLIB.ORG

Improving Your Junctions' Function: Utilizing Clinical Decision Making with Refining Techniques of HVLAT for Comfort and Effectiveness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Improving Your Junctions' Function: Utilizing Clinical Decision Making with Refining Techniques of HVLAT for Comfort and Effectiveness Improving Your Junctions' Function: Utilizing clinical decision making with refining techniques of HVLAT for comfort and effectiveness Alec Kay, PT, MSPT, DMT, ATC, OCS, FAAOMPT Brian Power, PT, DPT, DMT, FAAOMPT 2105 AAOMPT Conference – Louisville, KY Sunday, October 25, 2015 INTRODUCTION: Alec Kay – PT, MSPT, DMT, ATC, OCS, FAAOMPT Alec received a Bachelors of Science in Exercise Physiology and was Certified as an Athletic Trainer in 1988 at the University of California, Davis. He was awarded a Masters of Science in Physical Therapy from the University of the Pacific in 1990. His additional post-graduate studies included completion of a Master of Orthopedic Manual Therapy in 1997 and a Doctor of Manual Therapy degree in 2000 from the Ola Grimsby Institute. Alec is currently teaching advanced techniques in manual therapy in the states as well as in Europe. Brian Power – PT, DPT, DMT, FAAOMPT Brian received a Bachelors of Science in Community Health in 1984. He then graduated from the University of Puget Sound in 1988 with a Bachelors of Science in Physical Therapy. He completed a four-year post-graduate program in Manual Therapy from the Ola Grimsby Institute in 1995. Brian was awarded a Doctor of Manual Therapy degree in 2005. Brian teaches post-graduate courses in manual therapy in the states and in Europe and Asia. SCHEDULE: 8.00 – Introduction 8.05 – Cervico-Thoracic indications and technique 8.15 – Upper Rib indications and technique 8.25 – Mid/Lower Rib indications and technique 8.35 – Thoraco-Lumbar indications and technique 8.45 – Lumbo-Sacral indications and technique 8.55 - Close Components of an OMT Examination www.olagrimsby.com ! Positional testing ! Palpation of the Carotid Artery ! Neurological examination ! Craniovertebral ligament testing ! Blood pressure ! Differentiation ! Refer on for further investigation ! Additional training unlock your future IFOMPT Cs Exam Guidelines 2012 IFOMPT Cervical Manipulation Survey www.olagrimsby.com All of the 20 member countries responded and recommended: • Use of sustained pre-manipulation position hold • Performance of craniovertebral ligament stress tests • Dizziness differentiation test • Hautant’s test unlock your future Carlesso and Rivett 2007 Examination / Risk www.olagrimsby.com 1. Initial Observation 2. History/Interview 3. Structural Inspection 4. Active Movements 5. Passive Movements 6. Resisted Movements X 3 7. Palpation 8. Neurological Examination 9. Specific Mobility Tests and Positional Faults 10. Specific Regional Tests 11. Additional Test (MRI, x-ray, etc.) 12. Correlation 13. Treatment 14. Prognosis unlock your future CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY The following list of contraindications for spinal manipulative therapy was updated and adapted from Kleyhans AM, Terret AGJ, The prevention of complications from spinal manipulative Therapy, Aspects of Manipulative Therapy, 161-174 ABSOLUTE: Articular derangements: References: 1. Acute arthritis of any kind 9, 11, 13, 14, 18, 23, 24, 35, 38 2. RA with instability or acute 4, 9, 10, 11, 18, 23, 35, 38 3. Ankylosing spondylitis—acute 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 18, 27, 35 4. Dislocation 9, 15, 36 5. Hypermobility of segment 9, 10, 11, 21, 24, 35 6. Ruptured ligaments 9, 35 7. Trauma of recent occurrence--whiplash 9, 35 8. Advanced degenerative changes 11 9. Congenital generalized hypermobility (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) 11 Bone weakening and destructive disease: References: 1. Calve's disease 22 2. Fracture 9, 15, 23, 27, 29, 34, 35 3. Malignancy/tumor (primary/secondary) 4, 9, 10, 11, 13, 23, 24, 27, 35, 36 4. Osteomalcia 10, 11, 13, 22 5. Osteoporosis 2, 4, 9, 23, 27, 34, 35 6. Osteomyelitis 11, 14, 27, 33, 35 7. Tuberculosis (Pott's disease) 4, 11, 14, 23, 34, 35, 36 Circulatory disturbances: References: 1. Aneurysm 2. Anticoagulant therapy 6, 11, 13 3. Atherosclerosis 3, 13 4. Visceral arterial disease 11 5. Calcification of aorta 13 Disc lesions: References: 1. Prolapse with serious neurological changes 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 27, 28, 35 2. Evidence of more than one spinal nerve root on one side 11 3. Cervical or thoracic joint conditions causing neurological signs in lower limbs 11, 13 4. Acute cervical or lumbar herniation 9 5. Thoracic herniation 9 Neurologic dysfunction: References: 1. Micturition with sacral root involvement 5, 35 2. Painful movement in all directions 23 3. Transverse myelitis 11 4. Severe root pain 11 5. Malformations of spinal cord including syringomyelia 10 Unclassified: References: 1. Infectious disease 13, 23, 27 2. Uncooperative patient or patient intolerance 10, 23 3. Advanced diabetes when tissue value may be low 11, 13 4. Undiagnosed pain 11 RELATIVE: Articular derangements: References: 1. Ankylosing spondylitis after acute stage 2, 9, 29, 33, 35 2. Articular deformity 5, 9 3. Congenital anomalies 12, 18, 23, 32, 37, 38 4. Hypertrophic spondyloarthritis 9, 13, 33 5. Osteoarthritis - especially severe or advanced 9, 13, 35 6. Osteochondrosis 9 7. RA - subacute 13, 27, 38 8. Torticollis 5 9. Inflamed joint 13 Bone weakening and modifying disease: References: 1. Hemangioma 31, 34 2. Paget's disease 11, 22, 27, 33 3. Scheuermann's disease 1, 14, 18, 23, 27 4. Spondylolisthesis/spondylolysis with symptoms 9, 13, 14, 33 Disc lesions: References: 1. Posterolateral and posteromedial disc protrusions 13 2. Degeneraative disease 17, 28, 35 Neurological dysfunction: References: 1. Myelopathy 5, 35 2. Non-vertebragenous pain 27, 35 3. Pyramidal tract involvement 5 4. Radicular pain with disc lesion 13, 35 5. Viscerosomatic reflex pain 27, 35 Unclassified: References: 1. Abdominal hernia 30 2. Asthma 1, 30 3. Dysmenorrhea 30 4. Epicondylitis 8 5. Long term steroid use 13 6. Low pain threshold 13 7. Peptic ulcer 18 8. Post spinal surgery 27 9. Pregnancy, especially first trimester 5, 13, 27, 33 10. Scoliosis 11, 13, 35 11. Psychogenic disorders with dependence on manual therapy 9, 13 12. Patients who have been treated recently by another practitioner 13 13. Signs and symptoms do not match 13 REGIONAL: Thoracic spine: References: 1. Scoliosis 11 2. Unilateral hemi-vertebrae 12 Lumbar spine: References: 1. Accessory sacroiliac joint 2. Baastrup's disease 12, 23 3. Cleft vertebra in sagittal plane 12 4. Facet tropism 12, 18 5. Knife clasp syndrome 6. Nuclear impression 12 7. Progressive osteoarthritis of sacroiliac joint 9 8. Pseudosacralization 12, 18 9. Sacralization, lumbarization 11, 12, 18 10. Spina bifida occulta 11, 18 11. Spondylolisthesis (neighboring segments okay) 9, 18 Bibliography 1. Beyeler W, Scheuermann's disease and its chiropractic management, Annals of Swiss Chiropractors Assoc, 1:70, 1960. 2. Bollier W, Inflammatory, infections and neoplastic disease of the lumbar spine, Annals of Swiss Chiropractors Assoc, 1960b. 3. Boshes LD, Vascular accidents associated with neck manipulation, JAMA 1652:1710, 1959. 4. Bourdillon JF, Spinal manipulation, 3rd edition, Appleton-Century-Croft, New York, 1982. 5. Cyriax J, Textbook of orthopedic medicine, vol. II, 10th edition, Balliere Tindall, London, 1980. 6. Dabbert O, Freeman DG, Weis AJ, Spinal meningeal hematome, warfarin therapy and chiropractic adjustment, JAMA 214:11, 1970. 7. Davidson KC, Weiford EC, Dixon GD, Traumatic vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm following chiropractic manipulation, Neuroradiology, 115:651, 1975. 8. Droz JM, Indications and contraindications of vertebral manipulations, Annals of Swill Chiropractors Assoc, 5:8, 1971. 9. Dvorak J, Inappropriate indications and contraindications for manual therapy, J Man Med, 6(3):85- 89, 1991. 10. Dvorak J et al, Consensus and recommendations as to the side effects and complications of manual therapy of the cervical spine, J Man Med, 6(3): 117-118, 1991. 11. Grieve GP, Common vertebral joint problems, Churchill Livingston, New York, 1981. 12. Grillo G, Anomalies of the lumbar spine, Annals of the Swiss Chiropractors Assoc, 1:56, 1960. 13. Hartman L, Handbook of Osteopathic Technique, Hutchinson, Sydney, 1985. 14. Hauberg GV, Contraindications of the manual therapy of the spine, Hippokrates, p. 231, 1967. 15. Heilig D, Whiplash – mechanics of injury, management of cervical and dorsal involvement, In: 1965 Yearbook. Academy of Applied Osteopathy, 1965. 16. Hooper J, Low back pain and manipulation. Paraparesis after treatment of low back pain by physical methods, Medical J of Australia, 1:549-551, 1973. 17. Jaquet P, Clinical chiropractic - A study of cases, Crounauer 18. Janse J, Principles and practice of the chiropractic: an anthology, R Hildegrandt (ed), National College of Chiropractic, Lombard, Illinois, 1976. 19. Jennett WB, A study of 25 cases of compression of the cauda equina by prolapsed LVD, J Neurology, Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, 19:109, 1956. 20. Kaiser G, Orthopedics and traumatology, Beitr. Orthop., 20:581, 1973. 21. Kaltenborn FM, Manual therapy of the extremity joints, Oslo, Olaf Norlis Bokhandel, 1976. 22. Lindner H, A synopsis of the dystrophies of the lumbar spine, Annals of Swiss Chiropractic Assoc, 1:143, 1960.23. Maigne R, Orthopaedic medicine: a new approach to vertebral manipulations, Charles C. Thomas, Illinois,1972. 24. Maitland GD, Vertebral manipulation, 4th edition, Butterworth, London, 1977. 25. Mehalic T, Farhat SM, Vertebral artery injury from chiropractic manipulation, Sirg Neuro, 2:125, 1974 26. Miller RG, Burton R, Stroke following chiropractic manipulation of the spine, JAMA, 229:189, 1974 27. Nwuga VC, Manipulations of the spine, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1976. 28. Odom GL, Neck ache and back ache. Proceedings of the NINCDS Conference on Neck Ache and Back Ache, Charles C. Thomas, Illinois, 1970. 29. Rinsky LS, Reynolds GG, Jameson RM, Hamilton RD, Cervical spine cord injury after chiropractic adjustment, Paraplegia, 13:227-233, 1976. 30. Sandoz R, About some problems pertaining to the choice of indications for chiropractic theapy. Annals of the Swiss Chiropractors Assoc, 3:201, 1965. 31. Sandoz R, Presentation and discussion of a few cases of lumbo-abdominal pain, Annals of the Swiss Chiropractic Assoc, 4, 1969. 32. Sandoz R, Newer trends in the pathogenesis of spinal disorders, Annals of the Swiss Chiropractors Assoc, 5, 1960.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Torticollis Is a Clinical Diagnosis Based on Head Tilt in Association with a Rotatory Deviation of the Cranium
    24. Define type of torticollis? Torticollis is a clinical diagnosis based on head tilt in association with a rotatory deviation of the cranium. Congenital muscular torticollis is the most common type of torticollis. It presents in the newborn period. Its cause is unknown, but it has been hypothesized to arise from compression of the soft tissues of the neck during delivery, resulting in a compartment syndrome. Radiographs of the cervical spine should be obtained to rule out congenital vertebral anomalies. Clinical examination reveals spasm of the sternocleidomastoid muscle on the same side as the tilt causing the typical posture of head tilt toward the tightened muscle and chin rotation to the opposite side. Initial treatment is stretching and is successful in up to 90% of patients during the first year of life. Surgery is considered for persistent deformity after 1 year of age. Common problems noted in patients with congenital muscular torticollis include congenital hip dysplasia and plagiocephaly (facial asymmetry). Source: Spine Secret Plus, 2nd ed. page 256. 25. What clinical problems result from basilar impression? Patients present with a short neck, painful cervical motion, and asymmetric of the skull and face. Additional clinical problems include nuchal pain, vertigo, long tract signs with associated cerebellar ataxia, and lower cranial nerve involvement resulting in dysarthria and dysphagia Source: Spine Secret Plus, 2nd ed. page 258 26. What is Steel’s Rule of Third? Steel noted that the area of the spinal canal at the C1 leve in a normal person could be divided into equal thirds with one third occupied by the odontoid process, one third by the spinal cord, and one third as empty space.
    [Show full text]
  • Sciatica and Chronic Pain
    Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh 123 Sciatica and Chronic Pain Robert W. Baloh Sciatica and Chronic Pain Past, Present and Future Robert W. Baloh, MD Department of Neurology University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles, CA, USA ISBN 978-3-319-93903-2 ISBN 978-3-319-93904-9 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93904-9 Library of Congress Control Number: 2018952076 © Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors, and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Eyes Cause Neck Pain? International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 23 (10)
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Northumbria Research Link Citation: Hood, Wendy and Hood, Martin (2016) Can eyes cause neck pain? International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 23 (10). pp. 499-504. ISSN 1741-1645 Published by: Mark Allen Publishing URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.10.499 <http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2016.23.10.499> This version was downloaded from Northumbria Research Link: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/28627/ Northumbria University has developed Northumbria Research Link (NRL) to enable users to access the University’s research output. Copyright © and moral rights for items on NRL are retained by the individual author(s) and/or other copyright owners. Single copies of full items can be reproduced, displayed or performed, and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided the authors, title and full bibliographic details are given, as well as a hyperlink and/or URL to the original metadata page. The content must not be changed in any way. Full items must not be sold commercially in any format or medium without formal permission of the copyright holder. The full policy is available online: http://nrl.northumbria.ac.uk/policies.html This document may differ from the final, published version of the research and has been made available online in accordance with publisher policies. To read and/or cite from the published version of the research, please visit the publisher’s website (a subscription may be required.) Sensory Integration: Can eyes cause neck pain? Abstract This article is an analysis of literature relating to ocular-motor imbalance and the potential postural consequences.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE REPORT Cervical Spondylolysis
    Acta Orthop. Belg., 2006, 72, 511-516 CASE REPORT Cervical spondylolysis : A case report Seddik OUESLATI, Khalil ZAOUIA, Mouna CHELLI From the M. Matri Hospital, Ariana, Tunisia Cervical spondylolysis is defined as a corticated cleft a relatively innocuous condition, thus preventing between the superior and inferior articular facets of inappropriate treatment and unnecessary surgery. the articular pillar, the cervical equivalent of the pars We present a case of this anomaly as imaged interarticularis in the lumbar spine. Of primary with plain radiography, computed tomography and importance is its recognition to avoid confusion with MRI. Differential diagnosis and a brief review of more clinically significant abnormalities such as the literature are discussed. fracture or dislocation. This case report describes bilateral spondylolysis and associated dysplasia of C5 in a 31-year-old female. CASE REPORT We describe the radiographic presentation of this anomaly, stressing the importance of computed A 31-year-old woman was referred by her gen- tomography for correct diagnosis. eral practioner to our hospital, with neck and right A review of the literature on this interesting abnor- shoulder pain. This had started 7 years previously mality and a complete differential diagnosis are pre- without any identifiable trauma or other precipitat- sented. ing event. She was then treated conservatively with analgesics. Three months prior to her consultation, Keywords : cervical spine ; spondylolysis ; spondylolis- her neck pain worsened, without any neurological thesis ; radiography ; computed tomography ; magnetic deficit. On physical examination weakness of resonance imaging. abduction of the right shoulder was noted. Palpation of her neck revealed mild tenderness over the mid-cervical spine with painful limitation of INTRODUCTION Spondylolysis with or without spondylolisthesis is a rare condition in the cervical spine, charac- terised by the presence of a corticated cleft between ■ Seddik Oueslati, MD, Registrar.
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern of Premature Degenerative Changes of the Cervical Spine in Patients with Spasmodic Torticollis and the Impact on The
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:465–471 465 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.68.4.465 on 1 April 2000. Downloaded from Pattern of premature degenerative changes of the cervical spine in patients with spasmodic torticollis and the impact on the outcome of selective peripheral denervation S J Chawda, A Münchau, D Johnson, K Bhatia, N P Quinn, J Stevens, A J Lees, J D Palmer Abstract modic torticollis with botulinum toxin Objectives—To characterise the pattern of seems to have a protective eVect. Patients and risk factors for degenerative changes with spasmodic torticollis and restricted of the cervical spine in patients with spas- head mobility who do not adequately modic torticollis and to assess whether respond to treatment should undergo these changes aVect outcome after selec- imaging of the upper cervical spine. tive peripheral denervation. Patients with imaging evidence of moder- Methods—Preoperative CT of the upper ate or severe degenerative changes seem cervical spine of 34 patients with spas- to respond poorly to selective peripheral modic torticollis referred for surgery were denervation. reviewed by two radiologists blinded to the (J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000;68:465–471) clinical findings. Degenerative changes were assessed for each joint separately Keywords: osteoarthritis; spasmodic torticollis; com- and rated as absent, minimal, moderate, puted tomography; selective peripheral denervation or severe. Patients were clinically assessed before surgery and 3 months postopera- Idiopathic spasmodic torticollis is the most tively by an independent examiner using common form of adult onset focal dystonia.1 It standardised clinical rating scales. For comparison of means a t test was carried is characterised by repetitive or sustained con- tractions of neck muscles that lead to an out.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolescent Idiopathic Torticollis: Morphological Vertebral Changes of the Spinal Canal and the Spinal Cord Position: a Case Report
    ISSN: 2469-5777 Carbonell and Ruiz. Trauma Cases Rev 2017, 3:056 DOI: 10.23937/2469-5777/1510056 Volume 3 | Issue 2 Trauma Cases and Reviews Open Access CASE REPORT Adolescent Idiopathic Torticollis: Morphological Vertebral Chang- es of the Spinal Canal and the Spinal Cord Position: A Case Report Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell* and Ruiz Miñana E Check for Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, General University Alicante Hospital, Spain updates *Corresponding author: Pedro Gutiérrez Carbonell, Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, General Uni- versity Alicante Hospital, Paraje Ledua E-25, 03660-Novelda, Spain, Tel: 00-34-606-468-139, Fax: 00-34-965-242-454, E-mail: [email protected] (Sandifer Syndrome), traumatic or oropharyngeal inflam- Abstract mation (Grisel’s Syndrome), anomalies of the brain stem Cervical spinal canal deformities can be caused by muscu- and cervical spine (syringomyelia, diastematomyelia and lar deforming forces, as in the case of a 10-year-old male with inveterate left torticollis. Atlas and axis bone deformi- Arnold-Chiari malformation) or tumors of the posterior ties were observed, including subluxation of the odontoid cranial fossa (astrocytoma and ependymoma) [1-5]. After apophysis, hypertrophy of the anterior arch of the atlas, hy- this wide differential diagnosis was made, orthopedic and poplasia of the posterior arches of atlas, and deformation occasionally surgical treatment of torticollis with muscular of the spinal canal accompanied by an eccentric position of the spinal cord. After tenotomy of Sternocleidomastoid etiology is performed, preferably, within the first year of Muscle (SCM) and 5-years of follow-up, the deformities life, because after this age facial deformities are irrevers- were unchanged.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Chiropractic
    Your chiropractic diagnostic Your health on a daily basis your chiropractic Therapeutic use of ice and heat Sleep Position report of findings Your pillow should keep your neck aligned with the Skull rest of your spine. HEADACHES • EARACHES • TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS • TENDINITIS • NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • BACK PAIN • DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • CHRONIC PAIN ICE : For severe injuries (first 48 hours), swellings, bruises, sprains, stabbing pains • On your back side, place a pillow under your knees NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • BACK PAIN • DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • CHRONIC PAIN • SPRAINS • HEADACHES • EARACHES • TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS • or joint pains. to ease spinal tensions. VERTEBRAE C1 1. Apply ice or gel pack. EARACHES • TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS • TENDINITIS • NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • BACK PAIN • DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • CHRONIC PAIN • SPRAINS • C2 • On your side, a pillow between your knees will avoid C3 2. Always use a thin piece of cloth between the ice pack and your skin. SPRAINS • HEADACHES • EARACHES • TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS HEADACHES • TENDINITIS • NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • BACK PAIN • DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • Cervical C4 3. Apply ice for 10 to 12 minutes every hour. having a twisted torso and spine. C5 C6 4. In subacute or chronic conditions, ice can be used 2 to 3 times for 10 to 12 minutes • Never sleep on your stomach. TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS • TENDINITIS • NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • BACK PAIN • DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • CHRONIC PAIN • SPRAINS • HEADACHES C7 every day. DISC HERNIATIONS • SCIATIC PAIN • CHRONIC PAIN • SPRAINS • HEADACHES • EARACHES • TORTICOLLIS • NECK PAIN • BURSITIS • EPICONDYLITIS • TENDINITIS • NUMBNESS • ARTHRITIS • T1 5. NEVER leave ice on for more than 12 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • MRI Findings for Low Back Pain Can Be Misleading
    March 1, 2007 • www.familypracticenews.com Musculoskeletal Disorders 43 MRI Findings for Low Back Pain Can Be Misleading BY BRUCE K. DIXON taken within 6-12 weeks of the start of a new low back er had some degenerative disease at the L4-5 level and, Chicago Bureau pain episode, were then compared with baseline (asymp- at follow-up scan, had a grade 1 spondylolisthesis with in- tomatic) images. creased stenosis,” Dr. Carragee said. S EATTLE — MRI findings within 12 weeks of serious Within the total cohort, 25% were evaluated with a Subjects involved in current compensation claims were low back pain inception are unlikely to represent new lumbar MRI for clinically serious low back pain episodes more likely to have an MRI scan to evaluate a low back structural change, according to a study at Stanford (Calif.) occurring during follow-up, and pain episode but were unlikely to University. 6% had a primary radicular com- have significant new findings. “We had hypothesized that serious low back pain plaint. Of those 51 patients, 43 ei- ‘Physicians “In usual practice, if a patient episodes would be commonly associated with new and ther had an unchanged MRI or directing has minor trauma from a fender specific findings on MRI, and we were really thinking showed regression of baseline treatment need to bender or a fall and you get an about such things as annular tears, fissures, disk hernia- changes. be careful before MRI, it shows a high-intensity tion, new disk protrusion, and end plate changes. But ... “There are relatively few new saying, “Aha! I zone, an annular fissure, or end the data didn’t support that hypothesis,” said Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuro Spine Care for Kids
    Volume 2, Issue 1 NEURO SPINE CARE FOR KIDS David Wrubel, M.D., and Barun Brahma, M.D. When the spine is properly functioning, a child can run, jump, play and learn—a kid can be a kid. However, when the spine malfunctions due to a birth defect, tumor, injury or disease, a child’s activity level can change overnight. The Pediatric Spine: Not Just an Adult Spine To use an old adage, children are not small adults. This statement is particularly appropriate when discussing the spine. At birth, the newborn spine is relatively straight, lacking the normal sagittal curves seen in adults. When the newborn begins holding his head up, the cervical lordosis develops, which is followed by development of the lumbar lordosis when the child begins standing and walking. A child’s head proportionately accounts for far more total body area and mass than an adult’s head, a roughly one-to-four ratio in infants compared to a one-to-seven ratio in adults. This, combined with disproportionately weak cervical musculature and small spinous processes, places greater stress on the pediatric cervical spine, helping to explain why the cervical spine is the most injured segment of the immature spine. Other significant differences between the pediatric and adult spine include anterior wedging of the vertebral bodies; more horizontal orientation of the facet joints; and overall laxity of the spinal ligaments (particularly the interspinous ligament). These factors both predispose children to a different pattern of injury and disease and present special challenges in the management of pediatric spine pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Longstanding Congenital Muscular Torticollis Provoking Pelvic Malalignment Syndrome?
    children Article Is Longstanding Congenital Muscular Torticollis Provoking Pelvic Malalignment Syndrome? Jun-il Park, Joo-Hyun Kee , Ja Young Choi and Shin-seung Yang * Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 35015, Korea; [email protected] (J.-i.P.); [email protected] (J.-H.K.); [email protected] (J.Y.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: It has been reported that congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) may result in secondary scoliosis over long-term follow-ups. However, there are few reports on whether CMT causes pelvic malalignment syndrome (PMS). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between CMT and PMS and to determine the factors associated with the development of PMS in children with longstanding CMT. Medical records of 130 children with CMT who had long-term follow-up were reviewed retrospectively. The chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine which initial clinical parameters contributed to the development of PMS. Among 130 children with CMT, 51 (39.2%) developed PMS with or without compensatory scoliosis during long-term follow-up, indicating a high prevalence of PMS in children with a CMT history. Initial clinical symptoms such as a limited range of motion of the neck or the presence of a neck mass could not predict the development of PMS. Even if the clinical symptoms are mild, long-term follow-up of children with CMT is essential to screen for PMS. Citation: Park, J.-i.; Kee, J.-H.; Choi, Keywords: pelvic malalignment syndrome; congenital muscular torticollis; long-term follow-up; scoliosis J.Y.; Yang, S.-s.
    [Show full text]
  • Complications of Cervical Spine Manipulation Therapy: 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Single-Group Practice
    Neurosurg Focus 13 (6):Clinical Pearl, 2002, Click here to return to Table of Contents Complications of cervical spine manipulation therapy: 5-year retrospective study in a single-group practice DAVID G. MALONE, M.D., NEVAN G. BALDWIN, M.D., FRANK J. TOMECEK, M.D., CHRISTOPHER M. BOXELL, M.D., STEVEN E. GAEDE, M.D., CHRISTOPHER G. COVINGTON, M.D., AND KENYON K. KUGLER, M.D. Oklahoma Spine and Brain Institute, Tulsa, Oklahoma; and Texas Tech University, Author: provide city and state Object. The authors report a series of 22 patients in whom major complications developed after cervical spinal manipulation therapy (CSMT). A second objective was to estimate the regional incidence of these complications and to compare it with the very low incidences reported in the literature. Methods. During a 5-year period, practioners at a single group neurosurgical practice in Tulsa, Oklahoma, treated 22 patients, who were markedly worse during, or immediately after, CSMT. The details of these cases are reported. The 1995 US Government National Census was used to define the regional referral population for Tulsa. The pub- lished data regarding the incidence of serious CSMT-related complications and the rate of CSMTs undertaken nation- ally were used to estimate the expected number of CSMT-related complications in the authors’ region. The number (22 cases) reported in this series was used to estimate the actual regional incidence. Complications in the series included radiculopathy (21 cases), myelopathy (11 cases), Brown–Séquard syndrome (two cases), and vertebral artery (VA) occlusion (one case). Twenty-one patients underwent surgery. Poor outcomes were observed in three, outcome was unchanged in one, and 17 improved.
    [Show full text]
  • Left Torticollis Right Torticollis
    Objectives Torticollis and Plagiocephaly To gain a better understanding of: • WHAT are torticollis and plagiocephaly Diana Sullivan Compton, PT • WHY the incidence has increased so dramatically Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario • WHO is most at risk • HOW you can help with prevention • WHEN intervention should be initiated Left torticollis Right torticollis WHAT is torticollis? • The word torticollis describes a posture characterized by ipsilateral side flexion (± flexion or extension) and contralateral rotation N.B. Torticollis is named by the direction of the TILT, not the TURN. • Other soft tissue (skin, fascia) and muscles may also be affected Review of Anatomy • Muscle most commonly associated with torticollis is the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) • There is a SCM on each side – 1 can be tight Splenius capitis – 1 can be weak Levator scapula – A combination of both Platysma Scalenes 1 Types of Torticollis Differential Diagnosis • Congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) • Less common – Intra-uterine positioning – Klippel-Feil syndrome – Fibromatosis – Cervical spine articular malformations, subluxations, or – Generally, shortening of SCM on one side dislocations – Incidence varies from 0.4-1.9% (Karmel-Ross, 1997) to 16% – CNS lesions (cervical spinal cord, intracranial) or peripheral (Stellwagen, 2008) nerve lesions • Can also be acquired after birth – Benign paroxysmal torticollis – SCM shortening less likely – GERD (Sandifer’s syndrome) – Contralateral weakness generally the problem – Ocular torticollis – Vestibular torticollis Associated
    [Show full text]