2020 Investor Day

December 2020

NYSE: CDE

NYSE: CDE 1

JC 2016 Cautionary Statements

This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of securities legislation in the United States and Canada, including statements involving strategic priorities, expectations regarding environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives, anticipated production, costs and expenses, cash flow, returns, net asset values, growth, trading liquidity, upside potential, capital allocation, return on capital, health and safety protocols, exploration and development efforts, COVID-19 planning and response measures, operations and initiatives at the Palmarejo, Rochester, Kensington, Wharf and Silvertip mines, including mill expansion, completion of a pre-feasibility study, exploration plans and expectations regarding Silvertip, the impact of the new crushing circuit at Rochester, post-expansion free cash flow expectations at Rochester, the impact of a new stacking plan at Rochester,andfinancialoutlook.Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors which may cause Coeur's actual results, performance, or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others, the risk that the strategies, initiatives and expectations described in this presentation are not achieved on a timely basis or at all, the risks and hazards inherent in the mining business (including risks inherent in developing large-scale mining projects, environmental hazards, industrialaccidents,weather,orgeologicallyrelatedconditions),changesinthemarketpricesofgold,silver,zinc,andlead, and a sustained lower price or higher treatment and refining charge environment, the uncertainties inherent in Coeur's production, exploratory and developmental activities, including risks relating to permitting and regulatory delays (including the impact of government shutdowns), ground conditions, grade variability, any future labor disputes, or work stoppages, the uncertainties inherent in the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, changes that could result from Coeur's future acquisition of new mining properties or businesses, the loss or insolvency of any third-party smelter to which Coeur markets its production, the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including impacts to the availability of our workforce, continued access to financing sources, government orders that may require temporary suspension of operations at one or more of our sites and effects on our suppliers or the refiners and smelters to whom the Company markets its production, the effects of environmental and other governmental regulations and government shut-downs, the risks inherent in the ownership or operation of or investment in mining properties or businesses in foreign countries, Coeur's ability to raise additional financing necessary to conduct its business, make payments or refinance its debt as well as other uncertainties and risk factors set out in filings made from time to time with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Canadian securities regulators, including, without limitation, Coeur's most recent reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q. Actual results, developments, and timetables could vary significantly from the estimates presented. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward looking statements. Coeur disclaims any intent or obligation to update publicly such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Additionally, Coeur undertakes no obligation to comment on analyses, expectations, or statements made by third parties in respect of Coeur, its financial or operating results or its securities. Christopher Pascoe, Coeur's Director, Technical Services and a qualified person under Canadian National Instrument 43-101, reviewed and approved the scientific and technical information concerning Coeur's mineral projects in this presentation. Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerationsappliedtothemthatwouldenablethemtobeconsideredforestimation of mineral reserves, and there is no certainty that the inferred mineral resources will be realized. For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral reserves and resources, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political, marketing or other relevant factors, Canadian investors should see the Technical Reports for each of Coeur's properties as filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors - The United States Securities and Exchange Commission permits U.S. mining companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only those mineral deposits that a company can economically and legally extract or produce. We may use certain terms in public disclosures, such as "measured," "indicated," "inferred” and “resources," that are recognized by Canadian regulations, but that SEC guidelines generally prohibit U.S. registered companies from including in their filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the disclosure in our Form 10-K which may be secured from us, or from the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. Non-U.S. GAAP Measures - We supplement the reporting of our financial information determined under United States generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) with certain non-U.S. GAAP financial measures, including adjusted net income (loss), operating cash flow excluding changes in working capital, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, total leverage, net leverage, free cash flow and adjusted costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound. We believe that these adjusted measures provide meaningful information to assist management, investors and analysts in understanding our financial results and assessing our prospects for future performance. We believe these adjusted financial measures are important indicators of our recurring operations because they exclude items that may not be indicative of, or are unrelated to our core operating results, and provide a better baseline for analyzing trends in our underlying businesses. We believe adjusted net income (loss), adjusted EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin, total leverage, net leverage, free cash flow and adjusted costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound are important measures in assessing the Company's overall financial performance. This presentation does not represent an offer of any securities for sale.

NYSE: CDE 2

JC 2016 Cautionary Statements (cont.)

Cautionary Statements Regarding Company Outlook In connection with Coeur’s regular planning process, Coeur’s management prepared certain unaudited financial and operating projections, some portions of which are included in this presentation. These projections were not prepared with a view toward complying with published guidelines of the SEC, the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to prospective financial information or GAAP, but, in the view of Coeur’s management, were prepared on a reasonable basis, reflect the best then-available estimates and judgments, and present, to the best of management’s knowledge and belief at the time, the expected course of action and the expected future financial and operating performance of Coeur. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as necessarily indicative of actual future results, and readers of this presentation are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these projections. These projections have been prepared by, and are the responsibility of, Coeur’s management. Neither Coeur’s independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any procedures with respect to these projections, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, such projections. The assumptions and estimates underlying these projections are inherently uncertain and, although considered reasonable by the management of Coeur as of the date of their preparation, are subject to a wide variety of significant business, economic, and competitive risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in these projections, including, among others, risks and uncertainties relating to Coeur’s businesses (including its ability to achieve strategic goals, objectives and targets over applicable periods), industry performance, the regulatory environment, general business and economic conditions and other factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of Coeur’s most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and its other periodic reports filed with the SEC. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that these projections are indicative of the future performance of Coeur or that actual results will not differ materially from those presented. Inclusion of these projections in this presentation should not be regarded as a representation by any person that the results contained in these projections will be achieved. Coeur does not intend to update or otherwise revise these projections to reflect circumstances existing since their preparation or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, even in the event that any or all of the underlying assumptions are shown to be in error. Furthermore, Coeur does not intend to update or revise these projections to reflect changes in general economic or industry conditions.

NYSE: CDE 3

JC 2016 Introduction to Coeur Video

NYSE: CDE 4

JC 2016 Management Participants & Agenda

Mitchell J. Krebs Thomas S. Whelan Michael “Mick” Routledge Terry F.D. Smith President & Senior Vice President & Senior Vice President & Senior Vice President & Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer Chief Operating Officer Chief Development Officer

Casey M. Nault Hans J. Rasmussen Emilie C. Schouten Senior Vice President, Senior Vice President, Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary Exploration Human Resources

• Strategy • Exploration

• Environmental, Social & Governance • Finance

• Organization & Culture • Conclusion

• Operations & Projects • Q&A

NYSE: CDE 5

JC 2016 Company Overview

Headquartered in Chicago, IL, Coeur Mining (NYSE: CDE) is a well-diversified, growingpreciousmetalsproducerwitharepositionedportfolio,focusedon generating sustainable, high-quality cash flow from its North American assets

Five Three Cash Flow & Returns Committed Best-in-class quality operations top jurisdictions focused community partner corporate governance

Palmarejo Northern Mexico Au Ag

Rochester SILVERTIP West-Central Nevada KENSINGTON Ag Au Kensington Southeast Alaska Au WHARF ROCHESTER Wharf CORPORATE OFFICE Black Hills South Dakota Au

PALMAREJO Silvertip Northern British Columbia Ag Zn Pb

NYSE: CDE 6

JC 2016 Key Messages

Rebuilt Coeur has established a healthy culture, developed a solid strategy, and Foundation assembled a strong, aligned team to deliver consistent results

Industry The Company is an industry leader in environmental, social and Leader in ESG governance practices

Transformational The expansion of Rochester is technically sound, provides excellent Expansion at economics, has a solid funding plan, and is expected to fundamentally Rochester reshape Coeur

High-Impact The Company’s higher-level of exploration investment is a key Exploration differentiator and is leading to new discoveries, longer mine lives and Growth higher returns

Silvertip Recent technical work and exploration results are creating a potentially Potential Restart compelling path forward

Robust The three-year outlook reflects strong returns from the Company’s Three-Year portfolio followed by an anticipated step change in cash flow post- Outlook Rochester expansion

NYSE: CDE 7

JC 2016 Strategy Mitchell J. Krebs President & Chief Executive Officer

NYSE: CDE 8

JC 2016 Compelling Strategy Aligned with Stockholder Priorities

Coeur’s strategy is to safely and responsibly discover, develop and operate a balanced portfolio of quality precious metals assets in low-risk jurisdictions to maximize cash flow, returns and net asset value

Priorities • U.S.-based and NYSE-listed, mid-tier gold and silver producer • Balanced portfolio of assets located solely in North America Purpose Culture

Alignment • Targeting higher returns on invested capital and strong free cash “Why” “How” flow1 growth via high-impact organic growth

• Industry-leading investment in exploration

Organization Strategy 

Accountability • Recognized as industry leader for ESG programs and initiatives “Who” “What” • Approaching key inflection point driven by Rochester expansion

Execution • Approximately $40 million ADTV (~2.3% of market cap)2

Protecting the Social and Governance Environment Community Impact Performance

• Leading tailings management • 237 high-impact community • 50% of independent directors are procedures and practices partnerships3 diverse • Published responsibility report in • Innovative development and • Innovative incentive compensation April 2020 diversity initiatives design aligned with stockholders • ISS “1” Quality Score for Governance • Recently entered into first-of-its kind • First precious metals company to sage-grouse habitat agreement in sign CEO Action for Diversity and • Proactive stockholder engagement Nevada Inclusion pledge • Winner of 2020 & 2019 Corporate • Partnership with Trout Unlimited to • 71% of employees from Secretary Magazine’s Best Proxy support abandoned mine legislation surrounding communities Statement Award (mid-/small cap)

(1) Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments. NYSE: CDE 9 (2) ADTV = Average Daily Trading Volume. Data observed over a 90-day trading period. FactSet as of November 30, 2020. (3) Reflects 2019 data.

JC 2016 Balanced, Low-Risk Portfolio of Precious Metals Assets

Metal Sales 2010 YTD 20201

12% Palmarejo 23% Rochester 35% Kensington Asset 45% 28% $516M $557M Wharf San Bartolomé 29% Other2 5% 13% 10%

15% U.S. Mexico 45% Bolivia Geography Australia 28% 65% Argentina

2% 35% 10% Over $420 million of U.S. Net Operating Losses3

Metal Ag Au Au Ag 69% 31% 76% 24%

(1) Through September 30, 2020. NYSE: CDE 10 (2) Other refers to Coeur Capital (primarily production from the Endeavor silver stream in Australia) and the Martha Mine in Argentina. Both assets have been sold by Coeur. (3) As of December 31, 2019.

JC 2016 Multiple High-Impact Organic Growth Opportunities

Coeur has multiple high-impact exploration, expansion and optimization opportunities embedded in its portfolio, which it is prioritizing and pursing based on the Company’s capital allocation framework

Exploration Expansion Optimization

Near-Mine New Discoveries Rochester POA 11 Rochester Throughput Expansion and HPGR Palmarejo District Sterling Palmarejo Processing Facility Crown Palmarejo Excess Processing East & West Rochester Kensington & Wharf Capacity/San Miguel C-Horst Automation Kensington District Camp Creek (Silvertip) Silvertip Expansion and Wharf Crushing Rates Silvertip District Restart La Preciosa

• Pursuing a higher standard • Aligning organizational structure and incentive compensation

• Executing largest exploration program in Company history • Measuring success based on actual results

• Allocating capital according to Company’s framework • Striving to achieve higher returns, longer mine lives and margin expansion

NYSE: CDE 11

JC 2016 Environmental, Social & Governance Casey M. Nault Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

NYSE: CDE 12

JC 2016 What Matters to Coeur

Environmental • Training and Development

• Climate Change • Health, Safety & Security

• Green House Gas Emissions Society

• Water Stewardship • Investment in Local Communities

• Waste Minimization • Indigenous Rights

• Biodiversity • Human Rights

• Tailings Management Governance

• Closure Planning • Ethics and Governance Social • Compliance Human Capital Management • Anti-Corruption

• Fair Employment Practices and Equal Opportunity

NYSE: CDE 13

JC 2016 Recent ESG Accomplishments

Coeur is committed to being an industry leader in its environmental, social and governance practices, exemplified by the Company’s accomplishments in protecting its people, places and planet

Developed TCFD Completed Community Completed Pay Reporting Road Relations Assessment & Equity Analysis Map Strategic Planning Effort #1

Ranked Among 2020 & 2019 Winner of Winner of cfi.co, Best Peer Group by Best Proxy Statement Miner Governance, North Sustainalytics, (mid-/small cap) 1 America 2020 May 2020 Published Responsibility Report

Mitchell Krebs, Korie Hickel, Manager ESG, President & CEO, named to SASB Extractives ISS QualityScore of ‘‘1’’ for named Vice Chair of Sector Standards Advisory Governance (Highest Possible) NMA ESG Task Force Group

(1) Corporate Secretary’s Corporate Governance Awards. NYSE: CDE 14

JC 2016 Governance: Goals & Highlights

Goal: Maintain Best-in-class Governance

• Proactively conduct off-season outreach to institutional stockholders of at least 0.15% of outstanding shares (~60% of shares outstanding) to solicit feedback on ESG and executive compensation programs and practices

• Governance recently recognized as the most important ESG factor among asset managers in an ISS survey1

Highlights

• 8/9 directors are independent Independent, Engaged and • Independent Board Chairman, separate from CEO Accomplished  Three new independent directors added since 1Q 20182 Board  Two directors recognized as NACD 100 top directors in 2019 & 2020

Committed to • 50% of independent directors are diverse in ethnicity or gender Diversity & Inclusion • First and only precious metals miner to join CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion

• Maintained ISS QualityScore of “1” for Governance (highest possible)

Recognized • Won Corporate Secretary Magazine Best Proxy Statement Award in 2019 & 2020 Governance Leader • Proactive Leadership in adopting best-in-class corporate governance reforms − Adopted proxy access and added misconduct to executive clawback policy

(1) https://www.issgovernance.com/iss-esg-survey-results-highlight-increased-asset-manager-focus-on-social-issues-in-light-of-covid-19-pandemic/. NYSE: CDE 15 (2) New independent director appointed in 2019 recently had to step down due to a new professional position that did not allow outside board service.

JC 2016 2020 Incentive Plan

• Coeur’s incentive plans are highly aligned with its strategic objectives and purpose statement • Added Return on Invested Capital and Major Project Execution measures for 2020

TRIFR % Reduction AIP 20%

PROTECT % Decline in Permit Exceedances

Three-Year Growth in Reserves and PSUs1 35% Resources from Continuing Operations Achievement of Milestones for Strategically PSUs1 30% DEVELOP Critical Long-Term Projects2 (new)

Costs Applicable to Sales per Ounce AIP 55% Adjusted EBITDA

Three-Year Return on Invested Capital (new) PSUs1 35% DELIVER

Production AIP 25%

(1) The three internal performance share metrics are subject to a relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) modifier that adjusts payouts +/-25% for top or bottom quartile performance compared to peers. NYSE: CDE 16 (2) Tied to achievement of Rochester and Silvertip expansion projects (split 20% Rochester and 10% Silvertip) and YE 2022 net asset values for Rochester and Silvertip.

JC 2016 Social: Goals & Highlights – Our People

Goal: Maintain Coeur as an Employer of Choice

• Safety: Zero harm; 7.5% reduction in three-year trailing average total reportable injury frequency rate

• Culture: Strengthen culture, employee engagement and retention

• Diversity: Foster an inclusive workplace that supports diversity and reflects the communities where we operate

Highlights

• Coeur expects to spend approximately $15 million through the end of the year in additional COVID-related costs to protect and provide for its employees and communities such as testing, contact tracing and pay and provision for quarantined employees Safety • Maintained industry-leading safety performance, including no fatalities, and reduced reportable injuries across the Company’s operations by 53% over the past nine years

• Hired, promoted and empowered female leaders across Coeur’s operations, including a new Mexico Country Manager and General Manager for the Rochester mine in Nevada Culture • Supported employees through COVID-19 with regular check-ins, surveys and resources

• Hosted a Day of Understanding in early 2020 to create platform for open dialogue and meaningful conversation on diversity and inclusion Diversity • Partnered with By the Hand Club, an organization focused on supporting Chicago’s Black community, to expose kids to STEM and career opportunities in the mining industry

NYSE: CDE 17

JC 2016 Social: Goals & Highlights – Our Communities

Goal: Make a Positive Impact on the Communities in Which We Work

• Human rights: Develop a formal grievance process by 2021 Highlights Across Coeur’s Operations Palmarejo

• Community partner for 17+ years • Provides general health care to the community free of charge in onsite clinic; recorded 11,547 total visits through 3Q 2020

Rochester • Community partner for 34+ years • Largest employer in Pershing County • Supported development of new regional workforce development initiative − First class graduated this fall Kensington

• Community partner for 33+ years • Established an endowed scholarship fund at the University of Alaska Southeast in 1991 and have supported since, including a $300K donation in 2020 to grow the fund

Wharf

• Community partner for 37+ years • 97% of employees live in the Black Hills • $1.5 million endowment fund to benefit the Black Hills community

NYSE: CDE 18

JC 2016 Environmental: Goals & Highlights

Goals: Improve Overall Impact Coeur Has on the Environment and Reduce Costs Over Time

• Develop organization-wide greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions reduction targets by 2021

• Conducted climate disclosures gap assessment during 2020, and enhance climate-related disclosures in 2021

• Invest in more efficient power plants that reduce both emissions and operating costs

• Reduce waste going to the landfill by 10% across sites by 20251

• 15% decrease in 2020 permit discharge exceedances1

2020 Highlights

Climate Change and GHG Emissions Supporting Biodiversity

• Designated site energy leads – identified 37 • In May 2020, Rochester participated in Nevada’s opportunities to reduce energy use and GHG Sage Grouse Conservation Credit System, and will emissions through technical solutions provide full funding to preserve and enhance over assessments 3,000 acres of vital greater sage-grouse habitat in Elko and Humboldt Counties • Recent initiatives at Rochester and Wharf are expected to reduce GHG emissions by more than 14,500 metric tonnes annually2

• Wharf expects to source more than 40% of its electricity from wind power beginning in 2021 with goal to increase to 100% subject to availability

(1) Compared to 2019 base year. NYSE: CDE 19 (2) Wharf greenhouse gas reduction estimate is based on 2019 electricity use.

JC 2016 Enhancing Coeur’s ESG Disclosures

Coeur is committed to being an ESG disclosure leader, including transparent and clear communication of performance and progress following SASB and TCFD frameworks

Sustainable Accounting Standards Board (“SASB”)1

• Focused on industry-specific financially material items; market-informed

• Preferred ESG disclosure framework for corporations backed by $15+ trillion of investor assets

• Coeur’s 2019 Responsibly Report aligned with SASB; enhanced disclosures planned for 2020 report

• Korie Hickel, Manager, ESG, named to SASB Extractives Sector Standards Advisory Group

Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“TCFD”)2

• Aims to measure the physical, liability and transition risks associated with climate change

• Climate scenario analysis and planning is an important component of this framework

• Coeur to start reporting in line with TCFD recommendations in its 2020 Responsibility Report

Spearheading ESG efforts in the mining industry: Mitchell Krebs was named Vice Chair of the National Mining Association’s newly-formed ESG Task Force in November 2020. He will oversee NMA’s ESG platform and facilitate sharing of best practices in the industry

(1) SASB - https://www.sasb.org/. NYSE: CDE 20 (2) Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures - https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/about/#; https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/2019-TCFD-Status-Report-FINAL-053119.pdf.

JC 2016 Culture & Organization Emilie C. Schouten Senior Vice President, Human Resources

NYSE: CDE 21

JC 2016 Culture at Coeur

2019 Coeur Culture Survey says we are…

• SAFE • ETHICAL • PROUD

93% 92% 92%

I feel safe performing my job If I see something unsafe, I am Coeur is committed to minimizing comfortable saying something its impact on the environment

global benchmark 81%1 global benchmark 80%1 global benchmark 62%1

90% 90%

If I observe misconduct, I know I am proud to work at Coeur how to report it Mining

global benchmark 80%1 global benchmark 69%1

(1) Qualtrics global benchmark of culture surveys from over 500 companies. NYSE: CDE 22

JC 2016 Coeur Leadership Principles

A successful leader at Coeur Mining …

PROTECT DEVELOP DELIVER OUR PEOPLE, PLACES, PLANET QUALITY RESOURCES, GROWTH, PLANS IMPACTFUL RESULTS THROUGH TEAMWORK

Lives our safety culture Pays attention to details Collaborates with other teams

Works with integrity and follows Delegates effectively Helps others solve problems policies Does what they say they will do Listens to other viewpoints Has courage to raise concerns Anticipates what may happen Communicates clearly and plans for it Respects work environment Provides honest and timely Takes accountability for actions feedback Leads by example and mistakes

Conduct Principles Individual Principles Teamwork Principles

NYSE: CDE 23

JC 2016 Coeur’s Culture of Diversity and Development

Females Diversity Local Hires Average Age

10% 18% 71% 40.3

66% females are Increased non-white 62% in Average age maintained managers and above population yr/yr since 2017 2018 since 2017

U.S. Veterans/Active Military IMPACT Training Participants employed by Coeur

72 heroes in 2020 (nearly 50% higher vs. 2017) 50 graduates, 92 currently enrolled

NYSE: CDE 24

JC 2016 Coeur’s Proactive COVID-19 Response

NYSE: CDE 25

JC 2016 Operations & Projects Michael “Mick” Routledge | Terry F.D. Smith Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer | Senior Vice President & Chief Development Officer

NYSE: CDE 26

JC 2016 Operations & Projects: Strategic Partnership

Michael “Mick” Routledge Terry F.D. Smith Senior Vice President & Senior Vice President & Chief Operating Officer Chief Development Officer

Operational Health, safety & Project Business planning & environmental execution Development execution programs

Select Prior Select Prior Leadership Spotlight: Operations Experience Leadership Spotlight: Projects Experience

Barrick, Cody Sutherlin Basie Maree Newmont, Mintails, Vice President, General Manager, Rio Tinto AngloGold U.S. Operations Silvertip Ashanti

Elaina Ware Teck, Patrick Hickey1 Newmont, General Manager, Rio Tinto, Project Director, BHP, Kinross, Nevada Kiewit POA 11 Sherritt

(1) Mr. Hickey is an independent contractor of Coeur Rochester, Inc. NYSE: CDE 27

JC 2016 Portfolio Overview

Coeur’s operations reflect the Company’s strategy of owning a balanced, safe and unique portfolio of North American-based precious metals assets

Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip

Snapshot

Chihuahua, Nevada, Alaska, South Dakota, British Columbia, Location Mexico United States United States United States Canada

Type Underground Open pit Underground Open pit Underground

Metal Au Ag Au Ag Au Au Ag Zn Pb

Employees1 860 297 374 244 101

% of YTD 2020 ~35% ~13% ~29% ~23% - Revenue2

2020E 100-110K oz Au 27-33K oz Au 122.5-130K oz Au 85-95K oz Au - Production3 6.0-7.0M oz Ag 3.1-3.7M oz Ag

Production ~334K oz Au ~155K oz Au ~331K oz Au ~263K oz Au - Outlook ~21.3M oz Ag ~17.1M oz Ag (2021E-2023E)4

(1) As of October 31, 2020. NYSE: CDE 28 (2) Through September 30, 2020. (3) Guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. (4) Please refer to the Finance section of this presentation for additional details on Coeur’s three-year outlook. JC 2016 Operations & Projects: Strategic Alignment

Coeur has strong strategic alignment across its business given the Company’s holistic approach to planning, including consistent foundational elements that drive a team-based approach to achieving near- and long-term goals

No Harm to People or Environment

Key Initiatives Accountability Strategic Timetable for to Achieve for Delivering Objectives Completion Objectives Initiatives

Capital Allocation Based on ROIC Proactive Identification and Mitigation of Key Risks Higher Standard of Recruiting, Retention and Development Efforts Establish Process-Driven Approach to Running the Business

Organizational Success

NYSE: CDE 29

JC 2016 Operational Framework and Commitment to Safety

Coeur deploys a rigorous planning process to help facilitate the methodical execution of its strategic operational objectives, while maintaining a steadfast commitment to the health and safety of its workforce Operations Planning Framework Management Operating System

Risk Weighting: Stretch GMs - + Downside Upside Target Managers - + Threshold Superintendents - + Risk Supervisors - + Front Line Employees

Value Lost-Time Injury Frequency Rate Total Reportable Injury Frequency Rate

1.53 1.67 1.64 2.34 1.41 1.37 2.23 2.23 1.25 1.34 2.02 1.93 1.16 2.27 1.73 1.68 1.81 0.74 1.58 0.43 0.42 0.33 0.30 0.23 0.26 0.20 0.26 1.04 1.03 0.96 0.85 0.82 0.60 0.69 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD 3 3 2020 2020 Industry average1 Coeur Mining2 Industry average1 Coeur Mining2

(1) Source(s): U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration: Metal Operators Mine Safety and Health Statistics. Injuries per 200,000 employee-hours worked. NYSE: CDE 30 (2) Includes both Coeur employees and contract workers. (3) Coeur YTD 2020 information through October 31, 2020.

JC 2016 Business Improvement: Project Delivery Mechanism

Coeur recently implemented a new system to advance projects, utilizing a simple stage gate process, to enhance its project execution and delivery capabilities

1 2 3 4 Concept Business case Value Planning and documented and developed and Results execution of Generation explored at a high value at stake initiative Delivered Ideas level understood

Concept Validation Planned Execution Locked-in

• Budget risk/opportunity • Idea analyzed for • Implementation plan and • Implementation plan assessment feasibility and cash flow milestones developed completed impact • Asset optimization review • Resources identified and • Results validated relative • Value proposition and allocated accordingly to plan and KPIs – • A unique idea generated preliminary schedule sustained for 3 months • Risk assessed • Concept description developed • Project summarized and documented • Business case updated • KPIs established (if needed) closed out • Owner identified • Delivery mechanism • Improvements • Execute on • High-level estimate of selected incorporated into budgets value enhancement implementation plan

NYSE: CDE 31

JC 2016 Business Improvement: 2020 Project Profiles

Significant production improvements have been possible at each operation through a series of targeted process changes

Primary Project Goals Accomplishments1 • Increase metallurgical recoveries by 2% and 1% for gold • Increased global metallurgical recovery of gold and silver by Palmarejo and silver, respectively, by introducing a second tailings approximately 1.6% and 1.8%, respectively thickener using the Counter Current Decantation • Improvements are expected to result in an annualized process benefit of roughly $7.0-$7.5 million • Increase load factor of haul trucks through the introduction of payload scanners and short interval control Rochester • Increase crusher productivity from 34,000 tons per day • Increased crusher throughput to approximately 38,000 tpd (“tpd”) to 38,000 tpd by advancing enabling projects: and “locked-in” result for 2021

− D&B optimization • Realized improvement of roughly $6.0-$8.0 million annually − Belt speed increase − Motor upgrades

• Increase mine output from an average of 1,807 tpd to • Created buffer of five days on surface stockpile, 15 days in Kensington ~1,850 tpd by tracking and managing key inputs: drilled inventory to generate benefit of approximately $2.0 − Drilled inventory, broken inventory, backfill plant million annually utilization, etc. • Increased feed rate for Jualin ore from 73 tons per hour to • Systematic modification of Knelson concentrator to run 79 tons per hour for an annual anticipated benefit of higher grade Jualin ore at higher rate without roughly $2.0 million overloading gravity circuit Wharf • Increase crusher productivity from 4.5 million tons to • On track to realize an additional 200,000 crushed tons 4.6 million tons annually without the use of a third-party • Expected to increased crusher throughput in 2021 to 4.6 crusher by advancing enabling projects: million tons without the use of third-party crusher worth an − Weekly to bi-weekly crusher downs estimated $2.0-3.0 million annually − Re-designed morning shift change

(1) Reflects expected annualized benefits achieved during 2020. NYSE: CDE 32

JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Overview

NYSE: CDE 33

JC 2016 Rochester: Near-Term Performance Update

Coeur is taking a diligent approach towards improving operational performance on the Stage IV leach pad, leveraging continuous feedback to strengthen short interval controls and enhance near-term production visibility

• Recovery model • Column data Modeling • Operational data • Continuous model recalibration

Recovery Modeling • Powder factor vs. throughput vs. gradation vs. recovery Blasting • Heap leach permeability and stability • Blast optimization

• Throughput vs. gradation vs. recovery 2020-2022 • Primary – Secondary – Tertiary performance Crushing Optimization • Heap leach permeability and stability  Loop 3- • Minerology Leaching 4 Month Cycle Blasting • Gradation vs. recovery vs. reagent vs. application rate • Heap leach permeability and stability

• Cyanide – free, WAD, concentration, consumption, base Leaching metals • Dissolved oxygen – sulphide evaluation, heap saturation Crushing • Leach pad planning – cell design, flowrates, on/off schedule

• Leach pad recovery and timing Recovery • Solution management and grade optimization • Merrill-Crowe performance

NYSE: CDE 34

JC 2016 Rochester: Near-Term Performance Update (cont.)

The Company continues to leverage the use of inter-lift liners in order to maximize the placement of HPGR-crushed ore on shallower portions of the Stage IV leach pad

• Phase 1 and 2 installed as an environmental mitigation controls in 2Q 2020

• Phase 3 installed in 3Q 2020 to reduce depth- to-liner challenges and reduce the impact of dilution on HPGR-crushed ore

• Phase 4 is in the process of being engineered/ constructed with a target of leaching in early 2021

Phases • Inter-lift liners decrease operational risk of Phase 3 1 & 2 recovery timing and dilution impacts from depth- to-liner challenges on the Stage IV leach pad

• Inter-lift liners designed to reduce overall depth- Phase 4 to-liner until the Stage VI leach pad is loaded in mid-2022

• Without inter-lift liner systems Rochester would likely have realized dilution and diffusion impacts on both gold and silver

NYSE: CDE 35

JC 2016 Rochester: Near-Term Performance Update (cont.)

Rochester is using the Stage IV leach pad to fully optimize HPGR technology, which is expected to simplify the crushing process, improve silver recoveries, and ultimately deliver higher production rates and improved margins Recoverable Placed vs. Produced Silver (K oz)

6,000 Expansion

5,000 Instillation of 4,000 Instillation of initial inter-lift liner HPGR unit 3,000

2,000

1,000

- 1H 2018 2H 2018 1H 2019 2H 2019 1H 2020 2H 2020E 1H 2021E 2H 2021E 1H 2022E 2H 2022E 1H 2023E 2H 2023E

Stage III Production Stage IV Production Stage VI Production Total Placed Recoverable

• Post HPGR install, Rochester has improved crusher throughput, removed dilution and depth to liner delays, improved understanding of mineralogy impacts, and has began optimizing crusher product size distributions (“PSD”) • In 2021, the operation is expected to build upon learnings from 2020 and focus heavily on crusher PSD and optimize leach kinetics on the Stage IV leach pad to fully prove out the anticipated benefits from HPGR technology

• By 2023, Rochester is anticipated to develop robust operating parameters for the new crushing system and leach pad to fully leverage and maximize the benefits of HPGR technology

NYSE: CDE 36

JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Expected to Unlock Significant Value1

Coeur expects Rochester to generate over $100 million in average annual free 2,3 cash flow post-expansion , leading to an after-tax NAV5% of $634 million with an internal rate of return of 31% based solely on proven and probable reserves

Low technical execution Top-tier mining 18-year mine life with Accelerated silver risk jurisdiction organic growth recoveries

Open pit, heap leach Nevada and U.S. NOLs Robust project pipeline 68%/2 yrs. vs. 61%/20 yrs.

Higher planned $397 million in $100+ million in avg. $634 million NAV5% throughput rates construction capital4 annual free cash flow2,3 based on P&P reserves

~28.5 million tons per year Funded with cash and debt Significant step-change With potential upside Value Proposition Facilitates Multiple Stockholder Priorities Successful Near-Mine Exploration • Higher overall returns on invested capital + • Sustained, strong free cash flow2 Economies of Scale + • Further de-leveraging opportunities HPGR Crusher Impact on Silver Recoveries • Leading, low-risk exposure to precious metals prices Higher Returns = • Funding of other high-quality growth opportunities Fundamental Step-Change for Coeur • Potential to return excess capital over the long term

(1) For additional information on the expansion of Rochester, Canadian investors should refer to the latest Technical Report for Rochester on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 37 (2) Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments. (3) Reflects annual average free cash flow from 2023 to 2032. (4) Reflects planned capital expenditures from 2021 to 2023. JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Overview Video

NYSE: CDE 38

JC 2016 Rochester: Scope of Expansion

The expansion of Rochester includes the construction of a new leach pad, a crushing facility equipped with two HPGR units, a Merrill-Crowe process plant, and related infrastructure to support the extension of its mine life

Three-stage crushing circuit, including two HPGR units (capacity of ~28.5M tons/year)

Stage VI leach pad Merrill-Crowe process plant (capacity of 300M tons) (capacity of 13,750 gpm1)

(1) Gallons per minute. NYSE: CDE 39

JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Capital and Funding Summary

The expansion of Rochester is technically sound, has a solid funding plan and compelling economics, and is expected to fundamentally reshape Coeur Rochester Expansion Capital Breakdown1 Funding Strategy

• Cash on balance sheet Crushing Circuit Cash on • Opportunistic monetization of strategic Leach Pad 14% 11% Hand investments (e.g., Metalla) Merrill-Crowe 9% • Expect strong cash flow generation during Indirect Cost Internally 11% construction period Generated Contingency − Operating cash flow from Rochester Cash Flow 2 ~$397M Other − Free cash flow3 from other operations Existing Debt • Revolving credit facility Capacity 21% 34% • Equipment and finance leases • Utilizing zero-cost collars on gold Opportunistic Hedging − Targeting up to 50% of expected gold production through 2022 Key Factors Driving Value Higher Expected Silver Recoveries4 Lower Expected Costs4,5 $8.83 67% 68% 63% 66% 54% 51% $6.58 47% 43% 38% $4.98 31% $4.21 $3.38 20% $2.43 16% 18% $1.89 $2.11 10% 14% $1.39 $1.23 $0.80 $0.59

30 Days 90 Days 180 Days 1 Year 2 Years Mining Crushing/Processing G&A Total Operating Cost ROM Cone Crushed HPGR 2018A 2019A LOM TR (1) Reflects planned capital expenditures from 2021 to 2023. NYSE: CDE 40 (2) Includes surface infrastructure (including power), capital spares, sales tax and insurance. (3) Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments. (4) Silver recoveries and life of mine (LOM) cost per ton figures as presented in Rochester’s latest technical report. Canadian investors should refer to the latest Technical Report for Rochester on file at www.sedar.com. (5) Mining cost per ton mined. Crushing/Processing, G&A and Total Operating costs per ton placed. Total Operating Cost includes third-party refining charges. JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Project Timeline

Coeur began initial construction on the expansion of Rochester in August 2020, with major construction projects scheduled to begin in 2021 and be largely completed by late 2022

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q 1Q 2Q Ramp-up to Leach Construction I Commercial Pad1 Began Production

Merrill-Crowe II Plant

Crushing III Circuit

General Site Infra. Power

Engineering Procurement Construction Commissioning

I II III

(1) Includes ancillary facilities. NYSE: CDE 41

JC 2016 Rochester: Reserve and Resource Summary

Coeur’s exploration success has led to significant increases in Rochester reserves, leading to a longer mine life with opportunities for continued growth

Proven & Probable Reserves Resources Measured & Indicated Inferred Silver (M oz) 185.5 Gold (K oz) 1,219

82.8 546 73.4 500 483 408 117.5 67.5 60.8 378 61.7 737 79.3 477 31.2 179

2015 2019 2020 2015 2019 2020 2015 2019 2020

• ~58% and ~65% increase year-over-year • Successful conversions reflected in year-over-year decrease in silver and gold in silver and gold reserves, respectively measured and indicated resources − Exploration success at Rochester − Silver and gold measured and indicated resources ~9% and ~4% higher vs. 2015, East and at depth, and declaration of respectively maiden Nevada Packard reserves • Continued expansion of inferred resources represents upside potential for future mine • Silver and gold reserves ~2.3x and life extensions ~2.6x higher vs. 2015, respectively − Silver and gold inferred resources ~2.0x and ~2.3x higher vs. 2015, respectively  • Significant improvement in mine life and • Significant potential to grow resource base with continued drilling of property package upside potential from resource adjacent to Rochester (acquired in 2018 for ~$19 million) conversions with continued drilling

Note: See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the latest Technical Report for Rochester on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 42

JC 2016 Rochester: Net Asset Value Sensitivities1

Silver Price ($/oz) (30%) (20%) (10%) Base2 +10% +20% +30% $13.62 $15.56 $17.51 $19.45 $21.40 $23.35 $25.29

($191) ($29) $132 $292 $452 $612 $772 (30%) $1,081

($76) $86 $246 $406 $566 $726 $886 (20%) $1,235

$39 $200 $360 $520 $680 $839 $999 (10%) $1,390 2 $153 $314 $474 $634 $793 $953 $1,113 Base $1,544 Gold Price ($/oz) Gold Price $267 $428 $588 $747 $907 $1,066 $1,226 +10% $1,698

$381 $542 $701 $861 $1,020 $1,180 $1,339 +20% $1,853

$495 $655 $815 $974 $1,133 $1,293 $1,452 +30% $2,007

(1) NAV values in $ millions. For additional information on the expansion of Rochester, Canadian investors should refer to the latest Technical Report for Rochester on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 43 (2) Represents weighted average life of mine metals price assumption.

JC 2016 Silvertip: Status Update

NYSE: CDE 44

JC 2016 Silvertip: Investment Thesis and Key Learnings

The key elements of Coeur’s acquisition strategy for Silvertip remain intact, further supported by the Company’s rigorous technical work completed in 2020 and exploration success to expand the resource

Acquisition Rationale Investment Thesis Key Learnings Since Acquisition • Highly-prospective deposit with large, • Exploration continues to indicate growth in the high-grade underexplored land package with resource in multiple directions Resource significant expansion potential − Over two miles (3.5 kilometers) of north-south strike • Among the highest-grade operations in length, more than triple the previous resource strike the sector length • Drill program continuing through the winter aimed at supporting a longer mine life

• Diversification of Coeur’s geographic • Developed meaningful relationships with First Nations Jurisdiction and political risk partners as well as the BC Ministry of Energy, Mines & − Exited Bolivia and entered Canada Petroleum Resources − Prepared to support potential restart and expansion • Permitted project in a great mining jurisdiction with supportive First Nations with additional permitting partners

• Upgradeable mill with excess crushing / • Improved metallurgical understanding of the deposit grinding capacity Commercial • PFS1 work demonstrates strong recoveries and grades • Capable of producing attractive • Mill expansion engineering continues with a targeted concentrates into the base metal capacity of 1,750 tpd2 market • Improvement in fundamentals of base metal markets

(1) Pre-feasibility study. NYSE: CDE 45 (2) Tonnes per day.

JC 2016 Silvertip: Key Outcomes of Pre-Feasibility Study

The primary goal of the pre-feasibility study was to build a mine plan that supports a safe operation with strong environmental compliance, a high level of reliability, the ability to withstand market downturns and can be a meaningful long-term business for Coeur

• Mine planning and design expected to deliver consistent supply of ore at target feed grade

• Mill flowsheet development and expansion supporting 1,750 tpd throughput rate − Anticipated to help generate commercially attractive concentrates at high recoveries

• Designing an expanded mill facility that eliminates the potential for lead exposure to employees and the environment − Facilitating easier maintenance and more consistent operating levels

• Developing a cost-effective power generation solution

• Delivering mass and water balance solutions that supports operational requirements and environmental stewardship

• Reducing operating costs and implementing advanced mining and processing technologies

The key elements of the pre-feasibility study have undergone third- party technical reviews with no significant recommendations

NYSE: CDE 46

JC 2016 Silvertip: Proposed Flowsheet and Key Improvements

Recovery improvements with carbon Recovery improvements removal and reagent conditioning with reagent conditioning

Potential lead pre-float (situational)

Lead concentrate grade improvements Zinc concentrate grade with additional retention time and a improvements with regrind mill addition additional retention time

NYSE: CDE 47

JC 2016 Silvertip: Metallurgy Update

Metallurgical test work has demonstrated strong recoveries and concentrate grades. Combining improved revenues (recovery, con grade), better margins (scale and reliability) and a longer mine life (exploration, lower cut-off grade) has the potential to create a compelling investment opportunity for Silvertip

Previous Flowsheet Resolved 2019 PFS Actual Ranges

!• Presence of carbonaceous ores in the mill feed Zinc ~70% 81%-90% negatively impacted lead rougher and cleaner (in zinc con) performance 1 − Poor lead rougher performance impacted zinc Lead concentrate grades ~75% 85%-91% (in lead con)

!• Absence of lead regrind for rougher concentrates Recoveries negatively impacted final concentrate grades Silver ~68% 76%-80% (in lead con) !• Recirculation of zinc and lead cleaner scavenger tails to rougher scavenger circuits compromised the limited cleaner capacities, resulting in lower final concentrate grades Pre-feasibility test work from the !• Adequate conditioning times are necessary Discovery and Silver Creek zones has between streams (zinc/lead/pyrite) in order to indicated the potential for strong enhance grade and recovery recoveries and concentrate grades

(1) Figures reflect metallurgical recoveries. NYSE: CDE 48

JC 2016 Silvertip: Next Steps

Coeur has made significant progress to advance Silvertip; however, additional steps are required for the Company to further de-risk the project and enhance the economics of a potential restart

Front-End Engineering and Design Scoping and Project risk reduction phase with capital optimization, progression of Pre-feasibility engineering to execution level design and schedule, engagement of key Engineering partners in permitting and construction

• Continue investing in exploration, extending mine life and project returns

Feasibility and • Evaluate potential financing alternatives (e.g., offtake agreements) Front-End • Progress engineering through Detailed Design phase Engineering and Design • Finalize project implementation and construction schedule • Prepare Project and Operational Readiness plans • Obtain permit amendments for restart and expansion with stakeholder's support

• Deliver updated technical report in 2H 2021

Implementation and Execution Evaluate investment according to Coeur’s capital allocation framework

NYSE: CDE 49

JC 2016 Exploration Hans J. Rasmussen Senior Vice President, Exploration

NYSE: CDE 50

JC 2016 Committed to a Higher-Level of Exploration Investment1

Coeur expects to maintain its commitment to a higher-level of exploration investment, while maintaining its results-driven focus on high-return targets Total Exploration Investment 2021E–2023E Exploration Investment ($M) Expensed Capitalized ~$63 Expensed Capitalized

8% 10% ~$57 ~$56 17% $55 20% 37% 22% ~$147M ~$29M 21% 13% + 20% 31% 1% 80%

$30 84% 86% 86% 7% 22% 15%

75% ~$176M 19% 16%

20% 20% 1% 25% 16% 14% 14% Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip 2 2019 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E Crown/Sterling Other

(1) Please refer to the Finance section of this presentation for additional details on Coeur’s three-year outlook. NYSE: CDE 51 (2) Midpoint of guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020.

JC 2016 Key Exploration Objectives

Coeur exceeded its internal expectations in 2020 while executing the largest exploration program in Company history. Recognizing the need for a multi-year commitment, each site has proposed an aggressive drilling program for 2021 with a continued focus on resource growth Drilling of resource expansion targets Palmarejo Ongoing exploration success near infrastructure Excess processing capacity at mill Directional drilling at East Rochester Rochester Drilling and planned integration of Lincoln Hill Significant potential immediately west of Rochester Organic Growth Opportunities Discovery/expansion of high-grade structures Kensington Transition focus to extending mine life Leverage existing infrastructure

Drill and complete test work on Richmond Hill Wharf Potential integration of Richmond Hill in mine plan Mine Life Extensions Continued expansion of reserves and resources Silvertip All known deposits remain open Significant district exploration potential Follow-up drilling on new discoveries (e.g., C-Horst) Crown/Sterling Significant potential to expand resources Methodically convert resources to reserves

NYSE: CDE 52

JC 2016 Rochester: Exploration Update

Coeur’s primary focus of the exploration program at Rochester in 2020 has been expansion drilling at East Rochester as well as infill drilling beneath the open pit to further improve the economics of the upcoming expansion

Expansion Program • 12 directional and two conventional core holes completed for a total of 19,042 feet (5,804 meters) of drilling − All holes were mineralized − East Rochester remains open to south and north

• Recent highlights include 195 feet of 2.35 oz/t silver and 0.016 oz/t gold

• A winter reverse circulation program began in mid-November to continue drilling north along the mineralized structure Infill Program • 46 holes for a total of 24,460 feet (7,455 meters) drilled in 2020

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 53 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Rochester: Successful Reserve and Resource Growth Rochester East Additional mineralization, 2018 2020 strip reduction opportunity

Rochester Deeps/North Layback 2018 2020

• Increased expansion of R&R to depth and to the north

• Grades at depth are lower on average

Note: See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the technical report on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 54

JC 2016 Rochester: Three-Year Drilling Outlook

Over the next three years, Coeur plans to focus on aggressive resource expansion drilling at East Rochester as well as new targets south and west of Rochester’s existing open pit

Rochester Drilling Priorities

Gold Ridge Lincoln Short-Term Medium-Term Long-Term Hill Rochester East Independence Rochester Hill

• East • Nevada- • Gold Ridge Wilco Rochester Nevada- Packard • Independence Packard East • Rochester (pit, • East Packard Hill Packard north, etc.) • Lincoln Hill • Wilco

Coeur expects to focus on its near- and medium-term drilling priorities over the next few years to align mine sequencing

NYSE: CDE 55

JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Priorities for 2021 and Beyond

Rochester

• Continue directional core program to south

• Reverse circulation drilling at north East Rochester and East Packard

Lincoln Hill District

• Drill targeting with geochemistry, geology and geophysics

• Begin Lincoln Hill District drilling in mid-2021 on 2.4 acre remaining in Notice Permit

• 200-acre plan of operations is received1, including Gold Ridge zone

• Continue to ramp up in subsequent years with the Property package adjacent to Rochester that Coeur acquired in late 2018 ultimate goal of first production for ~$19 million represents significant potential to further grow reserves 2024-2025 and leverage existing infrastructure

(1) Expected to be received in 2H 2021. NYSE: CDE 56

JC 2016 Rochester: Expansion Priorities for 2021 and Beyond (cont.) Gold Ridge Example1

Note the consistent gold grades, hosted in limestone of the Prita Formation above the Weaver/Rochester Formations

(1) https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/rye-patch-hits-at-gold-ridge-564369141.html. NYSE: CDE 57

JC 2016 Silvertip: Exploration Update

Coeur focused exclusively on expansion drilling at Silvertip through the first nine months of 2020. The Company has since transitioned its efforts to underground development to bolster exploration efforts and help facilitate follow-up drilling of encouraging results received earlier in the year Expansion Program • 120 core holes completed – 166,177 feet (50,651 meters) drilled so far in 2020

− Increased full-year 2020 target of ~210,000 feet (~64,000 meters)

• Significant new discoveries at Camp Creek, Tour Ridge and Keda zones

• Strong potential for resource growth north, east and south of the Discovery zone

Infill Program • Underground development has begun to cut a tunnel heading south from 65 Zone towards Tour Ridge

• Infill drilling from the drift is planned to help convert existing resources to reserves in order to extend mine life

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 58 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Silvertip: Exploration Update (cont.)

Combined, the Keda and Tour Ridge discoveries have demonstrated the potential for resource growth with over two miles (3.5 kilometers) of north- south strike length, more than triple the previous resource strike length

• 2020 marks the largest and most successful exploration program in the history of the property

• Coeur plans to test areas of “no historic drilling” in 2021 to confirm continuity of mineralization

• The Silvertip deposit remains open north, south and east

Silvertip Long Section (Looking East)

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 59 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Crown/Sterling: Land Position of ~35,500 Net Acres

AngloGold Silicon Project

Kinross Anglo

Kinross Bullfrog Gold Corp

NYSE: CDE 60

JC 2016 Crown/C-Horst: Exploration Update

For 2020, exploration has quickly shifted focus to the new C-Horst discovery, hole CH20-002 drilled in February. Due to drill disturbance limitations, all discovery holes to date have been from only two drill platforms

Hole CH20-002

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 61 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Crown/C-Horst: Geologic Model Underway

The first step in understanding the future resource and potential exploration upside is geologic modeling – with drill chips and core, Coeur’s first geological model is currently underway

Ore zone

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 62 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Crown/C-Horst: Highlights of Recent Drilling

C-Horst

CH20-040 Open to South

Pipeline Gulch

Hole 4 TWA

• 41 reverse circulation holes and three core holes completed for approximately 70,000 Mother feet (21,341 meters) Lode

• Three outcropping zones of gold mineralization identified to drill south of C- Horst: (i) Pipeline Gulch, (ii)TWA (0.03oz/t SNA gold on surface), and (iii) Hole 4 Resource ½ mile • Six new permitted drill sites have potential double C-Horst modeled shapes

Note: For complete tables of all drill results published in 2020, please refer to the following links: NYSE: CDE 63 https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-08-11_Exploration_Update_Appendix_-_Final.pdf; https://www.coeur.com/_resources/pdfs/2020-12-17-Investor-Day-Exploration-Update-Appendix-Final.pdf.

JC 2016 Finance Thomas S. Whelan Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

NYSE: CDE 64

JC 2016 Coeur’s Capital Allocation Framework

Mining is capital intensive and requires a disciplined approach to capital allocation with a view toward long-term reserve replacement and growth Illustrative Return Key Benefits Key Considerations

Safety/  Reflects the Company’s values Environment/ −  Mitigates risk for stakeholders Sustainability  Establishes and sustains social license

 Highest returns and quickest impact  Finite opportunity set Asset Optimization/ 25% +  Low capital intensity Enhancements  Lowest risk

 High success/lowest risk exploration  Returns dependent on specific deposit Brownfield 20% +  Low average discovery cost  All deposits eventually come to an end Exploration  Quick payback given existing infrastructure

 Opportunity to meaningfully impact  Limited number of opportunities meet criteria Opportunistic 15% + company  Requires significant organizational commitment M&A  Scale and liquidity can be differentiators  Challenging social dynamics Capital 6% - 10% estimated cost of capital Allocation  Potential to create substantial value from  Low success rate Greenfield Can vary new discoveries  Requires long-term, sustained financial and Exploration widely organizational commitment

 Eliminates/reduces interest expense  Low ROI Debt 5% - 6%  Improves balance sheet flexibility  Reduces cash liquidity levels Repayment  Mitigates downside metal price risk  Bond buybacks can be expensive

 Reflects Board and management  Industry’s cyclicality and capital intensity Dividends/ − confidence in long-term outlook  Not a key driver for most investors Repurchases  Provides discipline  Limited under indenture and credit agreement  Opportunity to differentiate among peers NYSE: CDE 65

JC 2016 Summary Overview of Funding Strategy

Coeur plans to fund its key internal growth projects, including the expansion of Rochester, and its higher-level of exploration investment with a combination of (i) cash on hand, (ii) operating cash flow, and (iii) existing debt capacity

• Capital for the expansion of Rochester expected to be approximately $397 million over the next three years Organic Growth & (2021-2023), including $42 million in contingencies Exploration Investments • Anticipated to remain committed to a higher-level of exploration investment, highlighted by approximately $175 million earmarked for drilling over the next three years (2021-2023)

• Targeting minimum year-end cash balance of approximately $70 million (2021-2023) • Recently expanded revolving credit facility by $50 million, bringing the total capacity to $300 million − Available capacity for additional capital leases and plan to coordinate a $50 million capital lease Capital package related to the expansion of Rochester Structure • Approximately $230 million of 5.875% senior notes due 2024 outstanding

• Near-term leverage ratios anticipated to be elevated to help support funding for the Rochester expansion − Targeting net leverage of less than ~2.0x during major construction

• 2021E: gold price of $1,900/oz, silver price of $23.00/oz − 158,700 gold ounces hedged (avg. ceiling of $1,875/oz and avg. floor of $1,600/oz) Outlook • 2022E: gold price of $1,800/oz, silver price of $22.00/oz Assumptions − 126,000 gold ounces hedged (avg. ceiling of $2,030/oz and avg. floor of $1,626/oz)

• 2023E: gold price of $1,700/oz, silver price of $21.00/oz − No hedges in place/anticipated to remain unhedged

Looking • Expected to be well-positioned to exit 2023 with a high-quality balance sheet and poised to evaluate Ahead potential return of capital alternatives

NYSE: CDE 66

JC 2016 Three-Year Outlook: Operational and Financial Overview1

Coeur’s operating and financial profile is expected to remain solid over the next two years, before improving in conjunction with the expected completion of the Rochester expansion by 2023 Production Summary Operating Cash Flow ($M) ~372 ~358 ~353 ~$230 ~$210 ~$197 ~15.0 ~11.5 ~12.2

2021E 2022E 2023E 2021E 2022E 2023E Gold Production (K oz) Silver Production (M oz) Capital Expenditures Free Cash Flow2,3 ($M) ($M) …ultimately leading to ~$142 ~$301 Meaningful ~$289 investments significant expected free cash during major flow generation post-expansion 30% 33% construction at Rochester…

~$88 70% 67% 88% ~($90) ~($91) 2021E 2022E 2023E 2021E 2022E 2023E Sustaining Development (1) Please refer to the previous page for key assumptions used in Coeur’s three-year outlook. NYSE: CDE 67 (2) Free cash flow is defined as cash flow from operating activities less capital expenditures and gold production royalty payments. (3) See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation.

JC 2016 Three-Year Outlook: Balance Sheet and Liquidity1

Coeur is targeting to maintain strong liquidity and manageable leverage levels during major construction at Rochester, supported by its flexible balance sheet Liquidity Profile ($M) 2021E 2022E 2023E • Targeting minimum year- end cash balance of Revolver Capacity $300 $300 $300 approximately $70 Less: Borrowings ~(47) ~(157) ~(67) million • Recently expanded Less: Letters of Credit ~(35) ~(35) ~(35) revolving credit facility Revolver Availability ~$218 ~$108 ~$198 by $50 million, bringing Plus: Cash and Equivalents ~70 ~70 ~70 the total capacity to $300 million Total Liquidity ~$288 ~$178 ~$268

Debt and Leverage Summary2,3 ($M)

~1.7x ~1.4x • Near-term leverage ~1.1x ~0.9x ~1.1x ~0.8x ~$440 ratios anticipated to be ~$349 ~$370 elevated to help support ~$279 ~$298 funding for the ~$228 expansion of Rochester • Targeting net leverage of less than ~2.0x during major construction 2021E 2022E 2023E Total Debt Total Leverage Net Debt Net Leverage

(1) Please refer to the previous two pages for key assumptions used in Coeur’s three-year outlook. NYSE: CDE 68 (2) See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (3) Net debt equals total debt less cash and cash equivalents.

JC 2016 Conclusion Mitchell J. Krebs President & Chief Executive Officer

NYSE: CDE 69

JC 2016 Key Messages

Rebuilt Coeur has established a healthy culture, developed a solid strategy, and Foundation assembled a strong, aligned team to deliver consistent results

Industry The Company is an industry leader in environmental, social and Leader in ESG governance practices

Transformational The expansion of Rochester is technically sound, provides excellent Expansion at economics, has a solid funding plan, and is expected to fundamentally Rochester reshape Coeur

High-Impact The Company’s higher-level of exploration investment is a key Exploration differentiator and is leading to new discoveries, longer mine lives and Growth higher returns

Silvertip Recent technical work and exploration results are creating a potentially Potential Restart compelling path forward

Robust The three-year outlook reflects strong returns from the Company’s Three-Year portfolio followed by an anticipated step change in cash flow post- Outlook Rochester expansion

NYSE: CDE 70

JC 2016 Appendix

NYSE: CDE 71

JC 2016 2020 Guidance1

Production Outlook Gold (oz) Silver (K oz)

Palmarejo 100,000 – 110,000 6,000 – 7,000 Rochester 27,000 – 33,000 3,100 – 3,700 Kensington 122,500 – 130,000 - Wharf 85,000 – 95,000 - Consolidated 334,500 – 368,000 9,100 – 10,700

CAS Outlook2 Gold ($/oz) Silver ($/oz)

Palmarejo (co-product) $650 - $750 $9.50 - $10.50 Rochester (co-product) $1,150 - $1,300 $13.50 - $14.75 Kensington $900 - $1,000 - Wharf (by-product) $875 - $925 -

Capital, Exploration and G&A ($M) Capital Expenditures, Sustaining3 $55 – $60 Capital Expenditures, Growth $45 – $55 Exploration, Expensed $43 – $49 Exploration, Capitalized $7 – $11 General & Administrative Expenses $32 – $36

Note: The Company’s guidance reflects realized prices through 3Q 2020 and estimated prices of $1,850/oz gold and $24.00/oz silver as well as CAD of 1.30 and MXN of 21.00 for 4Q 2020. NYSE: CDE 72 (1) Guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. (2) See non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. (3) Sustaining capital expenditures exclude capital leases. JC 2016 Palmarejo

Ownership 100% Claims 67,296 net acres Type Underground Crushing, grinding, flotation, CIL, Processing Merrill-Crowe precipitation, refining Metals Silver and gold doré Mine life ~7 years Palmarejo Chihuahua, Northern Mexico

Share of Companywide 2020E1 Production 2015 & 2019 Reserves & Resources2

P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources Gold Silver 50.5M 50.5M 26.3M 26.3M 693 690 34.5M 34.5M 367 44.9M 44.9M 425 30% 25.3M 351,250 9.9M 330 147

oz oz 8.2M 66%

2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 Gold (K oz) Silver (M oz)

(1) Based on midpoint of guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. NYSE: CDE 73 (2) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the applicable technical report on file at www.sedar.com.

JC 2016 Palmarejo (cont.)

Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Operating cash flow Capital expenditures $686 $660 $645 $10.06 $49.7 $622 $41.4 $602 $8.95 $8.79 $36.3 $8.37 $8.13 2,029 $28.9 32 32 1,835 1,720 29 29 1,784

$7.8 $8.6 $7.1 15 867 $4.5 $5.0

($3.5)

3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020

Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1 Silver production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AgOz1

Costs Per Ton 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 ($) UG tons mined 463,994 475,595 491,080 274,126 475,939

UG mining costs per UG ton mined $38 $35 $35 $32 $36

Processing costs per ton processed2 $26 $27 $24 $21 $25

G&A per ton processed3 $11 $10 $10 $12 $7

(1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. NYSE: CDE 74 (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate.

JC 2016 Rochester

Ownership 100% Claims 17,044 net acres Type Open pit and heap leach Crushing, dump heap leaching, Processing Merrill-Crowe precipitation, refining Metals Silver and gold doré Rochester Mine life ~18 years Nevada, U.S.

Share of Companywide 2020E1 Production 2015, 2019 & 2020 Reserves & Resources2

P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources 1,219

Gold Silver 185.5M 82.8M 82.8M 73.4M 73.4M 408 67.5M 67.5M 546 378 61.7M 61.7M 500 60.8M 60.8M 483 737 34% 117.5M

9.9M 79.3M

351,250 477 31.2M 31.2M oz oz 179 9%

2015 2019 2020 2015 2019 2020 2015 2019 2020 Gold (K oz) Silver (M oz)

(1) Based on midpoint of guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. NYSE: CDE 75 (2) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the applicable technical report on file at www.sedar.com.

JC 2016 Rochester (cont.)

Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M)

$1,481 Operating cash flow $1,359 Capital expenditures $1,230 $1,142 $1,148 $10.2 $9.8 $14.98 $14.24 $14.38 $8.3 $13.25 $13.75 $6.9 $5.8 $5.0 $5.1 $2.1

982 848 728 740 11 687 8 6 6 5 ($5.6)

($9.3)

3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020

Silver production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AgOz1 Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1

Costs Per Ton 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 ($) Ore tons mined 2,497,963 2,574,343 3,512,239 5,769,097 4,746,086

Strip Ratio 0.3:1 0.4:1 0.6:1 0.1:1 0.1:1

Mining costs per ton mined $2.75 $2.27 $1.47 $1.29 $1.93

Processing costs per ton processed2 $3.75 $4.57 $3.57 $3.30 $3.03

G&A per ton processed3 $1.24 $1.36 $1.25 $0.98 $0.95

(1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. NYSE: CDE 76 (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate.

JC 2016 Kensington

Ownership 100% Claims 12,336 net acres Type Underground Crushing, grinding, flotation Processing Kensington processing Alaska, U.S. Metals Gold concentrate Mine life ~3 years

Share of Companywide 2020E1 Production 2015 & 2019 Reserves & Resources2

P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources

Gold 762 690 518 560

351,250 358

oz 366

36%

2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 Gold (K oz) (1) Based on midpoint of guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. NYSE: CDE 77 (2) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the applicable technical report on file at www.sedar.com.

JC 2016 Kensington (cont.)

Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M)

2 $1,128 Operating cash flow Capital expenditures $976 $20.8 $928 $934 $19.2 $18.9 $822

$15.2 34 $14.2 32 33 30 27

$4.9 $4.8 $5.3 $4.3 $3.9

3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020

Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1

Costs Per Ton 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 ($) Ore tons mined 169,090 167,499 166,909 168,435 162,572

Mining costs per ton mined $58 $65 $64 $72 $73

Processing costs per ton processed3 $40 $43 $44 $40 $50

G&A per ton processed4 $38 $43 $46 $40 $41

(1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. NYSE: CDE 78 (2) Excludes impact of prepayments. (3) Excludes third-party smelting charges, which are reflected in average realized selling prices of concentrate production. (4) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate. JC 2016 Wharf

Ownership 100% Claims 7,852 net acres Type Open pit and heap leach Crushing, “on-off” heap leaching, Processing spent ore neutralization, carbon absorption/desorption Wharf Metals Electrolytic cathodic sludge South Dakota, U.S. Mine life ~7 years

Share of Companywide 2020E1 Production 2015 & 2019 Reserves & Resources2 P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources 334 Gold 134 768

26% 712 81

351,250 167 oz

2015 2019 2015 2019 2015 2019 Gold (K oz)

(1) Based on midpoint of guidance as published by Coeur on October 28, 2020. NYSE: CDE 79 (2) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the applicable technical report on file at www.sedar.com.

JC 2016 Wharf (cont.)

Production and Cost Performance Operating Cash Flow and Capital Expenditures ($M) Operating cash flow $1,090 Capital expenditures $39.1

$887 $802 $804 $804

33

26 26 $19.1 25 $17.6 $17.0

16

$2.6 $0.8 $0.8 $0.4 $0.3 $0.5

3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 Gold production (K oz) Adj. CAS per AuOz1

Costs Per Ton 3Q 2019 4Q 2019 1Q 2020 2Q 2020 3Q 2020 ($) Ore tons mined 1,315,446 1,169,344 921,897 1,376,237 1,320,542

Strip Ratio 1.0:1 1.1:1 1.8:1 0.9:1 1.5:1

Mining costs per ton mined $3.70 $3.82 $4.09 $3.93 $3.38

Pad unload costs per ton mined $1.13 $0.86 $0.59 $1.11 $0.68

Total mining costs per ton mined (incl. pad unload) $4.82 $4.67 $4.67 $5.04 $4.05

Processing costs per ton processed2 $1.82 $3.01 $3.36 $2.33 $3.35

G&A per ton processed3 $1.91 $2.59 $3.49 $1.84 $2.29

(1) See applicable non-GAAP reconciliation tables in the appendix to this presentation. NYSE: CDE 80 (2) Excludes third-party refining charges. (3) Excludes management fee allocated from corporate.

JC 2016 Silvertip

Ownership 100% Claims 98,834 net acres Type Underground Silvertip Crushing, grinding, flotation British Columbia, Canada Processing processing, concentrate thickening Metals Lead concentrate, zinc concentrate Mine life ~5 years

2018 & 2019 Reserves & Resources1

P&P Reserves M&I Resources Inferred Resources 14.9M 14.9M 15.0M 295.4M 295.4M 305.0M 305.0M 291.2M 291.2M 182.2M 182.2M 8.2M 8.2M 11.6M 11.6M 221.6M 221.6M 197.5M 197.5M 196.5M 196.5M 8.4M 8.4M 108.6M 108.6M 105.3M 105.3M 4.6M 4.6M 143.9M 143.9M 105.2M 105.2M 58.6M 58.6M

2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Silver (M oz) Zinc (M lb) Lead (M lb)

(1) See slides in appendix for additional information related to mineral reserves and resources. Canadian investors should refer to the applicable technical report on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 81

JC 2016 Non-GAAP Reconciliations

NYSE: CDE 82

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation for Guidance

Unaudited Costs Applicable to Sales Guidance for 2020

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $179,529 $102,554 $175,424 $94,989 Amortization (44,409) (14,561) (52,201) (11,600) Reported costs applicable to sales $135,120 $87,993 $123,223 $83,389 By-product credit ---(2,058) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $135,120 $87,993 $123,223 $81,331

Metal Sales Gold ounces 106,500 31,400 126,700 89,500 Silver ounces 6,400,000 3,600,000 95,000

Revenue Split Gold 52% 43% 100% 100% Silver 48% 57%

Costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $650 - $750 $1,150 - $1,300 $900 - $1,000 $875 - $925 Silver ($/oz) $9.50 - $10.50 $13.50 - $14.75

NYSE: CDE 83

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 3 months ended September 30, 2020

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $46,163 $22,382 $43,053 $31,887 $1,185 $144,670 Amortization (11,912) (3,278) (11,523) (4,000) (1,185) (31,898) Reported costs applicable to sales $34,251 $19,104 $31,530 $27,887 - $112,772 Inventory adjustments (100) 517 (141) (46) - 230 By-product credit - - - (1,007) - (1,007) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $34,151 $19,621 $31,389 $26,834 - $111,995

Metal Sales Gold ounces 27,252 6,834 27,815 33,382 95,283 Silver ounces 1,765,371 785,887 40,521 - 2,591,779

Revenue Split Gold 48% 40% 100% 100% Silver 52% 60% -

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $602 $1,148 $1,128 $804 Silver ($/oz) $10.06 $14.98 -

NYSE: CDE 84

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.) Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 3 months ended June 30, 2020

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $26,095 $21,348 $43,235 $25,653 $1,231 $117,562 Amortization (7,270) (3,012) (12,853) (3,181) (1,231) (27,547) Reported costs applicable to sales $18,825 $18,336 $30,382 $22,472 - $90,015 Inventory adjustments (106) (566) (139) (3,304) - (4,115) By-product credit - - - (385) - (385) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $18,719 $17,770 $30,243 $18,783 - $85,515

Metal Sales Gold ounces 16,924 5,278 32,367 23,364 77,933 Silver ounces 874,642 723,679 22,707 - 1,621,028

Revenue Split Gold 62% 44% 100% 100% Silver 38% 56% -

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $686 $1,481 $934 $804 Silver ($/oz) $8.13 $13.75 -

NYSE: CDE 85

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.) Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 3 months ended March 31, 2020

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $49,149 $19,860 $42,429 $20,267 $23,002 $154,707 Amortization (13,175) (2,904) (11,922) (2,444) (5,345) (35,790) Reported costs applicable to sales $35,974 $16,956 $30,507 $17,823 $17,657 $118,917 Inventory adjustments 73 (422) (101) (25) (10,381) (10,856) By-product credit - - - (248) - (248) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $36,047 $16,534 $30,406 $17,550 $7,276 $107,813

Metal Sales Gold ounces 31,287 5,473 32,781 16,094 85,635 Silver ounces 1,894,789 632,237 14,768 158,984 2,700,778 Zinc pounds 3,203,446 3,203,446 Lead pounds 2,453,485 2,453,485

Revenue Split Gold 56% 45% 100% 100% Silver 44% 55% 26% Zinc 48% Lead 26%

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $645 $1,359 $928 $1,090 Silver ($/oz) $8.37 $14.38 $11.79 Zinc ($/lb) $1.12 Lead ($/lb) $0.74

NYSE: CDE 86

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.) Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 12 months ended December 31, 2019

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $201,306 $118,246 $170,194 $92,969 $145,496 $728,211 Amortization (59,379) (18,041) (50,592) (12,280) (36,738) (177,030) Reported costs applicable to sales $141,927 $100,205 $119,602 $80,689 $108,758 $551,181 Inventory adjustments (344) (4,625) (913) (3,617) (64,610) (74,109) By-product credit - - - (1,072) - (1,072) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $141,583 $95,580 $118,689 $76,000 $44,148 $476,000

Metal Sales Gold ounces 116,104 36,052 130,495 84,999 367,650 Silver ounces 6,841,380 3,844,556 64,161 1,164,470 11,914,567 Zinc pounds 18,154,521 18,154,521 Lead pounds 16,487,847 16,487,847

Revenue Split Gold 56% 45% 100% 100% Silver 44% 55% 34% Zinc 39% Lead 27%

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $683 $1,193 $910 $894 Silver ($/oz) $9.11 $13.67 $12.89 Zinc ($/lb) $0.95 Lead ($/lb) $0.72

NYSE: CDE 87

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.) Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 3 months ended December 31, 2019

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $49,590 $31,100 $41,537 $29,818 $42,189 $194,234 Amortization (14,799) (5,791) (12,776) (4,072) (10,166) (47,604) Reported costs applicable to sales $34,791 $25,309 $28,761 $25,746 $32,023 $146,630 Inventory adjustments (11) (116) (176) (3,677) (23,325) (27,305) By-product credit - - - (373) - (373) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $34,780 $25,193 $28,585 $21,696 $8,698 $118,952

Metal Sales Gold ounces 27,953 11,248 29,293 27,039 95,533 Silver ounces 1,979,315 931,326 21,132 294,498 3,226,271 Zinc pounds 4,052,554 4,052,554 Lead pounds 4,223,504 4,223,504

Revenue Split Gold 50% 51% 100% 100% Silver 50% 49% 38% Zinc 32% Lead 30%

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $622 $1,142 $976 $802 Silver ($/oz) $8.79 $13.25 $11.22 Zinc ($/lb) $0.69 Lead ($/lb) $0.62

NYSE: CDE 88

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.) Costs Applicable to Sales Unaudited 3 months ended September 30, 2019

($ thousands, except per ounce amounts) Palmarejo Rochester Kensington Wharf Silvertip Total Costs applicable to sales, including amortization (U.S. GAAP) $53,237 $31,999 $43,085 $25,385 $32,457 $186,163 Amortization (15,840) (4,250) (13,552) (3,301) (8,268) (45,211) Reported costs applicable to sales $37,397 $27,749 $29,533 $22,084 $24,189 $140,952 Inventory adjustments (175) (4,799) (405) (7) (13,966) (19,352) By-product credit - - - (293) - (293) Adjusted costs applicable to sales $37,222 $22,950 $29,128 $21,784 $10,223 $121,307

Metal Sales Gold ounces 32,731 7,651 35,452 24,573 100,407 Silver ounces 1,747,250 951,043 16,612 289,910 3,004,815 Zinc pounds 4,076,390 4,076,390 Lead pounds 4,330,862 4,330,862

Revenue Split Gold 58% 41% 100% 100% Silver 42% 59% 39% Zinc 29% Lead 32%

Adjusted costs applicable to sales Gold ($/oz) $660 $1,230 $822 $887 Silver ($/oz) $8.95 $14.24 $14.14 Zinc ($/lb) $0.75 Lead ($/lb) $0.71

NYSE: CDE 89

JC 2016 Non-GAAP to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation (cont.)

Unaudited Three-Year Outlook Adjusted EBITDA Consolidated Debt

($ millions) 2021E 2022E 2023E ($ millions) 2021E 2022E 2023E

Net income (loss)1 ~$106 ~$51 ~$54 Cash and cash equivalents ~$70 ~$70 ~$70 Interest expense, net of capitalized interest ~23 ~22 ~21 Total debt ~349 ~440 ~298 Income tax provision (benefit) ~59 ~50 ~35 Net debt ~279 ~370 ~228 Amortization ~$135 ~$136 ~$166 LTM adjusted EBITDA ~$326 ~$264 ~$282 EBITDA ~$323 ~$258 ~$276 Total debt-to-LTM adjusted EBITDA ~1.1x ~1.7x ~1.1x COVID-19 costs ~6 - - Net debt-to-LTM adjusted EBITDA ~0.9x ~1.4x ~0.8x Asset retirement obligation accretion1 ~8 ~5 ~6 Inventory adjustments ~(13) - - Adjusted EBITDA ~$326 ~$264 ~$282

Free Cash Flow

($ millions) 2021E 2022E 2023E Gold price assumption ($/oz) $1,900 $1,800 $1,700 Silver price assumption ($/oz) $23.00 $22.00 $21.00 Cash flow from operating activities ~$210 ~$197 ~$230 Capital expenditures ~(301) ~(289) ~(88) Free cash flow ~$(90) ~$(91) ~$142

(1) 2022E and 2023E figures exclude asset retirement obligation accretion costs for Rochester. NYSE: CDE 90

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources

Rochester 2020 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Rochester 366,799,000 0.003 0.40 969,000 146,405,000 Nevada Packard 30,068,000 0.003 0.54 78,000 16,240,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 396,867,000 0.003 0.41 1,047,000 162,645,000

PROBABLE RESERVES Rochester 60,606,000 0.003 0.36 169,000 21,858,000 Nevada Packard 1,948,000 0.002 0.52 3,000 1,005,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 62,553,000 0.003 0.37 172,000 22,863,000

PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Rochester 427,405,000 0.003 0.40 1,138,000 168,263,000 Nevada Packard 32,016,000 0.003 0.54 81,000 17,245,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 459,420,000 0.003 0.40 1,219,000 185,508,000

NYSE: CDE 91

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

Rochester 2020 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves)

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) MEASURED RESOURCES Rochester 225,887,000 0.002 0.24 364,000 53,271,000 Nevada Packard 18,534,000 0.002 0.32 33,000 5,923,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 244,421,000 0.002 0.24 397,000 59,194,000

INDICATED RESOURCES Rochester 55,472,000 0.002 0.25 98,000 13,613,000 Nevada Packard 2,025,000 0.002 0.30 4,000 602,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 57,497,000 0.002 0.25 102,000 14,215,000

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Rochester 281,360,000 0.002 0.24 463,000 66,884,000 Nevada Packard 20,559,000 0.002 0.32 37,000 6,525,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 301,919,000 0.002 0.24 500,000 73,409,000

NYSE: CDE 92

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

Rochester 2020 Inferred Mineral Resources

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) MEASURED RESOURCES Rochester 221,115,000 0.002 0.27 397,000 59,643,000 Nevada Packard 4,935,000 0.002 0.41 11,000 2,027,000 Total Rochester Nevada, USA 226,050,000 0.002 0.27 408,000 61,670,000

Notes to Rochester 2020 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 16, 2020. (2) Assumed metals prices for estimated Mineral Reserves was $1,400 per ounce of gold and $17.00 per ounce of silver. (3) Assumed metals prices for estimated Mineral Resources was $1,600 per ounce of gold and $20.00 per ounce of silver. (4) Mineral Reserves based on a MMTS 2020 Ultimate Pit designs with no loss due to dilution. (5) Mineral Reserves are contained within MMTS 2020 Ultimate Pit designs targeting approximately 459 million tons of proven and probable reserves (insituorin stockpiles) and are supported by a mine plan featuring variable throughput rates, stockpiling, haulage and a cut-off optimization. The mine plan designs incorporate variable open pit slope angles over the pit life approximately averaging 43°, variable metallurgical recoveries depending on deposit location and material processed, including gold oxide recovery of 92%, gold sulfide recovery of 60%, silver oxide recovery of 70% and sulfide recovery of 60% for the Rochester deposit and gold oxide recovery of 92% and silver oxide recovery of 61% with no sulfide recovery for the Nevada Packard deposit. (6) The NSR cut-off for Mineral Reserves equals $2.55/ton for oxide and $2.65/ton for sulfide for the Rochester deposit and $3.70/ton for the Nevada Packard deposit. (7) Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. (8) Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of Mineral Reserves. (9) Mineral Resources for Rochester within confining pit shell use the following parameters: oxide recovery of 92% for gold and 70% for silver, and sulfide recovery of 60% for gold and 60% for silver with an NSR cutoff grade of $2.55/ton oxide and $2.65/ton sulfide. (10) Mineral Resources for Nevada Packard within confining pit shell use the following parameters: oxide recovery of 92% for gold and 61% for silver, with an NSR cutoff grade of $3.70/ton. (11) Rounding of short tons, grades, and troy ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grades, and contained metal contents. (12) U.S. Investors are cautioned that the term “Mineral Resource” is not defined or recognized by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (13) The qualified person for the Mineral Reserve estimate is Robert Gray, P.Eng., an independent Consulting Engineer. The qualified person for the Mineral Resource estimate is Matthew Bradford, RM-SME, a Coeur Mining, Inc employee. NYSE: CDE 93

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2019 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 1,093,000 0.093 5.17 102,000 5,649,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 249,815,000 0.003 0.45 710,000 112,286,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 898,000 0.200 - 180,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 23,436,000 0.024 - 571,000 - Silvertip Canada 176,000 - 11.31 9.84% 8.07% - 1,990,000 34,577,000 28,366,000 Total 275,418,000 0.006 0.44 1,563,000 119,925,000 34,577,000 28,366,000

PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 10,576,000 0.056 4.24 591,000 44,843,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 13,577,000 0.002 0.38 27,000 5,187,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 779,000 0.239 - 186,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 7,530,000 0.026 - 197,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,636,000 - 7.94 7.97% 5.14% - 12,986,000 260,847,000 168,096,000 Total 34,097,000 0.029 1.85 1,001,000 63,016,000 260,847,000 168,096,000

PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 11,669,000 0.059 4.33 693,000 50,492,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 263,392,000 0.003 0.45 737,000 117,473,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,677,000 0.218 - 366,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 30,965,000 0.025 - 768,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,812,000 - 8.26 8.15% 5.42% - 14,976,000 295,424,000 196,463,000 Total Proven and Probable Reserves 309,515,000 0.008 0.59 2,564,000 182,941,000 295,424,000 196,463,000

NYSE: CDE 94

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2019 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves)

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 870,000 0.055 3.69 48,000 3,210,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 194,330,000 0.002 0.35 450,000 67,602,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,062,000 0.239 - 493,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,631,000 0.027 - 178,000 - Silvertip Canada 138,000 - 10.85 9.79% 7.70% - 1,497,000 26,924,000 21,183,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 La Preciosa Mexico 9,536,000 0.005 3.04 45,000 29,001,000 Total 218,209,000 0.006 0.47 1,272,000 102,902,000 26,924,000 21,183,000

INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 7,894,000 0.048 3.97 377,000 31,313,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 42,015,000 0.002 0.36 96,000 15,195,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,164,000 0.231 - 269,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 4,926,000 0.032 - 156,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,579,000 - 6.39 8.81% 3.89% - 10,091,000 278,081,000 122,734,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 La Preciosa Mexico 19,141,000 0.006 3.98 118,000 76,185,000 Total 104,385,000 0.013 1.35 1,323,000 141,438,000 278,081,000 122,734,000

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 8,764,000 0.048 3.94 425,000 34,522,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 236,345,000 0.002 0.35 546,000 82,797,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 3,226,000 0.236 - 762,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 11,557,000 0.029 - 334,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,716,000 - 6.75 8.89% 4.19% - 11,588,000 305,005,000 143,917,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 La Preciosa Mexico 28,677,000 0.006 3.67 163,000 105,186,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 322,594,000 0.008 0.76 2,594,000 244,340,000 305,005,000 143,917,000

NYSE: CDE 95

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2019 Inferred Mineral Resources

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 6,469,000 0.057 4.07 367,000 26,341,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 171,042,000 0.002 0.36 378,000 60,803,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,562,000 0.229 - 358,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 2,483,000 0.033 - 81,000 - Silvertip Canada 976,000 - 8.40 9.34% 5.39% - 8,199,000 182,181,000 105,267,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Sterling Nevada, USA 32,013,000 0.030 - 960,000 - Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 La Preciosa Mexico 1,761,000 0.003 3.31 6,000 5,835,000 Total Inferred Resources 264,996,000 0.011 0.43 2,936,000 112,687,000 182,181,000 105,267,000

Notes to 2019 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 31, 2019. (2) Assumed metal prices for Mineral Reserves were $17.00 per ounce of silver, $1,350 per ounce of gold, $1.15 per pound zinc, $0.95 per pound lead. (3) Assumed metal prices for estimated Mineral Resources were $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,500 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound zinc, $1.05 per poundlead, except Lincoln Hill and Wilco at $1,350 per ounce gold and $22.00 per ounce silver, and Sterling at $1,200 per ounce of gold. (4) Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources are consideredtoospeculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of Mineral Reserves, and thereisno certainty that the Inferred Mineral Resources will be realized. (5) Rounding of tons and ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grade, and contained metal content. (6) For details on the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Canadian investors should refer to the NI 43-101 Technical Reports for Coeur's properties on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 96

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2018 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 1,283,000 0.084 4.97 108,000 6,376,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 228,413,000 0.003 0.44 657,000 101,058,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,600,000 0.186 - 298,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 34,043,000 0.026 - 877,000 - Silvertip Canada 280,000 - 10.81 9.83% 7.53% - 3,026,000 55,039,000 42,156,000 Total 265,620,000 0.007 0.42 1,940,000 110,461,000 55,039,000 42,156,000

PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 8,118,000 0.072 5.39 585,000 43,788,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 13,166,000 0.002 0.39 27,000 5,141,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 986,000 0.258 - 254,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 153,000 0.033 - 5,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,489,000 - 7.98 7.93% 5.22% - 11,885,000 236,200,000 155,305,000 Total 23,912,000 0.036 2.54 870,000 60,815,000 236,200,000 155,305,000

PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 9,401,000 0.074 5.34 693,000 50,164,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 241,580,000 0.003 0.44 684,000 106,200,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2.586,000 0.213 - 552,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 34,196,000 0.026 - 882,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,769,000 - 8.43 8.23% 5.58% - 14,911,000 291,239,000 197,461,000 Total Proven and Probable Reserves 289,531,000 0.010 0.59 2,810,000 171,276,000 291,239,000 197,461,000

NYSE: CDE 97

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2018 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves)

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 604,000 0.086 4.77 52,000 2,880,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 164,704,000 0.002 0.35 372,000 57,121,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,610,000 0.254 - 409,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 8,070,000 0.034 - 271,000 - Silvertip Canada 112,000 - 11.08 10.03 8.06 - 1,241,000 22,521,000 18,109,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 4,642,000 0.012 0.34 58,000 1,592,000 La Preciosa Mexico 9,536,000 0.005 3.04 45,000 29,001,000 Total 189,279,000 0.006 0.49 1,208,000 91,835,000 22,521,000 18,109,000

INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 7,544,000 0.054 4.27 407,000 32,194,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 34,290,000 0.002 0.37 82,000 12,733,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,071,000 0.245 - 262,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 626,000 0.042 - 26,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,179,000 - 6.04 8.44 3.69 - 7,118,000 199,096,000 87,082,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 27,668,000 0.011 0.31 306,000 8,655,000 La Preciosa Mexico 19,141,000 0.006 3.98 118,000 76,185,000 Total 91,519,000 0.013 1.50 1,200,000 136,885,000 199,096,000 87,082,000

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 8,149,000 0.056 4.30 458,000 35,074,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 198,994,000 0.002 0.35 454,000 69,854,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,681,000 0.250 - 671,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 8,696,000 0.034 - 297,000 - Silvertip Canada 1,292,000 - 6.47 8.58 4.07 - 8,359,000 221,617,000 105,191,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 32,310,000 0.011 0.32 364,000 10,247,000 La Preciosa Mexico 28,677,000 0.006 3.67 163,000 105,186,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 280,798,000 0.009 0.81 2,408,000 228,720,000 221,617,000 105,191,000

NYSE: CDE 98

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2018 Inferred Mineral Resources

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Zinc (%) Lead (%) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) Zinc (lbs) Lead (lbs) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 5,875,000 0.065 4.36 384,000 25,609,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 235,062,000 0.002 0.37 542,000 88,075,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 710,000 0.227 - 161,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 2,553,000 0.026 - 66,000 - Silvertip Canada 583,000 - 7.91 9.31 5.02 - 4,612,000 108,621,000 58,593,000 Lincoln Hill Nevada, USA 22,952,000 0.011 0.36 255,000 8,163,000 Sterling Nevada, USA 10,922,000 0.065 - 709,000 - Wilco Nevada, USA 25,736,000 0.021 0.13 531,000 3,346,000 La Preciosa Mexico 1,761,000 0.003 3.31 6,000 5,835,000 Total Inferred Resources 306,154,000 0.009 0.44 2,655,000 135,641,000 108,621,000 58,593,000

Notes to 2018 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 31, 2018. (2) Assumed metal prices for Mineral Reserves were $17.00 per ounce of silver, $1,250 per ounce of gold, $1.25 per pound zinc, $1.00 per pound lead. (3) Assumed metal prices for estimated Mineral Resources were $20.00 per ounce of silver, $1,400 per ounce of gold, $1.30 per pound zinc, $1.05 per poundlead, except Lincoln Hill and Wilco at $1,350 per ounce gold and $22.00 per ounce silver, and Sterling at $1,200 per ounce of gold. (4) Mineral Resources are in addition to Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources are consideredtoospeculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of Mineral Reserves, and thereisno certainty that the Inferred Mineral Resources will be realized. Rounding of tons and ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grade, and contained metal content. (5) For details on the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Canadian investors should refer to the NI 43-101 Technical Reports for Coeur's properties on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 99

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2015 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 802,000 0.077 6.29 62,000 5,048,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 96,520,000 0.003 0.53 316,000 51,007,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 338,000 0.198 - 67,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 11,791,000 0.032 - 374,000 - Total 109,451,000 0.007 0.51 819,000 56,055,000

PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 8,297,000 0.076 4.81 628,000 39,871,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 54,171,000 0.003 0.52 161,000 28,336,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,487,000 0.198 - 493,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 14,984,000 0.023 - 338,000 - Total 79,939,000 0.020 0.85 1,620,000 68,207,000

PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 9,100,000 0.076 4.94 690,000 44,919,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 150,691,000 0.003 0.53 477,000 79,343,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,825,000 0.198 - 560,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 26,775,000 0.027 - 712,000 - Total Proven and Probable Reserves 189,391,000 0.013 0.66 2,439,000 124,262,000

NYSE: CDE 100

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2015 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves)

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 134,000 0.052 4.86 7,000 651,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 60,528,000 0.004 0.49 233,000 29,709,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 347,000 0.277 - 96,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 2,513,000 0.030 - 75,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 18,156,000 0.006 3.21 108,000 58,225,000 Total 81,678,000 0.006 1.08 519,000 88,585,000

INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 5,787,000 0.056 4.25 323,000 24,622,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 80,423,000 0.003 0.47 250,000 37,745,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,485,000 0.284 - 422,000 Wharf South Dakota, USA 4,051,000 0.023 - 92,000 La Preciosa Mexico 20,818,000 0.004 2.75 88,000 57,198,000 Total 112,564,000 0.010 1.06 1,175,000 119,565,000

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 5,922,000 0.056 4.27 330,000 25,273,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 140,951,000 0.003 0.48 483,000 67,454,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,832,000 0.283 - 518,000 Wharf South Dakota, USA 6,564,000 0.025 - 167,000 La Preciosa Mexico 38,974,000 0.005 2.96 197,000 115,423,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 194,243,000 0.009 1.07 1,695,000 208,150,000

NYSE: CDE 101

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2015 Inferred Mineral Resources

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 1,721,000 0.085 4.79 147,000 8,240,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 59,597,000 0.003 0.52 179,000 31,195,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,059,000 0.335 - 690,000 - Wharf South Dakota, USA 4,488,000 0.030 - 134,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 1,359,000 0.004 2.33 5,000 3,168,000 Total Inferred Resources 69,224,000 0.017 0.62 1,155,000 42,603,000

Figures exclude mining properties previously divested by Coeur. Notes to 2015 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 31, 2015. (2) Assumed metal prices for estimated mineral reserves were $17.50 per ounce of silver and $1,250 per ounce of gold, except for lower 76 underground deposits at Palmarejo at $15.50 per ounce of silver and $1,150 per ounce of gold, and Wharf at $1,275 per ounce of gold. (3) Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of mineral reserves, and thereisno certainty that the inferred mineral resources will be realized. (4) Rounding of tons and ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grade, and contained metal content. (5) For details on the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Canadian investors should refer to the NI 43-101 Technical Reports for Coeur's properties on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 102

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2014 Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) PROVEN RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 1,089,000 0.043 3.37 46,000 3,670,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 89,077,000 0.004 0.56 346,000 49,786,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 417,700 0.187 - 78,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 18,830,000 0.006 3.16 111,000 59,534,000 Total 109,413,700 0.005 1.03 581,000 112,990,000

PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 5,627,000 0.078 4.80 441,000 27,007,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 56,158,000 0.003 0.54 172,000 30,418,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 2,986,000 0.185 - 551,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 21,851,000 0.004 2.71 91,000 59,196,000 Total 86,622,000 0.014 1.35 1,255,000 116,621,000

PROVEN AND PROBABLE RESERVES Palmarejo Mexico 6,715,000 0.073 4.57 488,000 30,677,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 145,235,000 0.004 0.55 518,000 80,204,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 3,403,000 0.185 - 629,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 40,681,000 0.005 2.92 202,000 118,730,000 Total Proven and Probable Reserves 196,034,000 0.010 1.17 1,837,000 229,611,000

NYSE: CDE 103

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2014 Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources (excluding Reserves)

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) MEASURED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 417,000 0.062 4.48 26,000 1,870,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 72,228,000 0.003 0.45 218,000 32,565,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 181,000 0.260 - 47,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 2,305,000 0.003 1.40 7,000 3,216,000 Total 75,131,000 0.004 0.50 298,000 37,651,000

INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 4,554,000 0.086 4.81 391,000 21,911,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 100,973,000 0.003 0.42 273,000 42,476,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,385,000 0.242 - 335,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 4,808,000 0.004 1.74 17,000 8,389,000 Total 111,720,000 0.009 0.65 1,016,000 72,776,000

MEASURED AND INDICATED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 4,971,000 0.084 4.78 417,000 23,781,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 173,201,000 0.003 0.43 491,000 75,041,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,566,000 0.244 - 382,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 7,114,000 0.003 1.63 24,000 11,605,000 Total Measured and Indicated Resources 186,852,000 0.007 0.59 1,314,000 110,427,000

NYSE: CDE 104

JC 2016 Reserves and Resources (cont.)

2014 Inferred Mineral Resources

Grade Contained

Location Short tons Gold (oz/t) Silver (oz/t) Gold (oz) Silver (oz) INFERRED RESOURCES Palmarejo Mexico 2,065,000 0.116 4.98 240,000 10,286,000 Rochester Nevada, USA 96,039,000 0.003 0.42 263,000 40,789,000 Kensington Alaska, USA 1,622,000 0.351 - 570,000 - La Preciosa Mexico 1,344,000 0.004 1.98 5,000 2,657,000 Total Inferred Resources 101,070,000 0.011 0.53 1,078,000 53,732,000

Figures exclude mining properties previously divested by Coeur. Notes to 2014 mineral reserves and resources: (1) Effective December 31, 2014. (2) Assumed metal prices for estimated mineral reserves were $19.00 per ounce of silver and $1,275 per ounce of gold. Assumed metal prices for mineral resources were $22.00 per ounce of silver and $1,350 per ounce of gold. (3) Palmarejo mineral reserves and resources are the addition of Palmarejo, Guadalupe, and Independencia deposits (measured, indicated, and inferred). There are no 2014 mineral reserves and resources for La Patria. (4) Mineral resources are in addition to mineral reserves and do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred mineral resources are considered too speculative geologically to have the economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be considered for estimation of mineral reserves, and thereisno certainty that the inferred mineral resources will be realized. (5) Rounding of tons and ounces, as required by reporting guidelines, may result in apparent differences between tons, grade, and contained metal content. (6) For details on the estimation of mineral resources and reserves, including the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate the Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves, Canadian investors should refer to the NI 43-101 Technical Reports for Coeur's properties on file at www.sedar.com. NYSE: CDE 105

JC 2016 Executive Leadership

Mitchell J. Krebs – President and Chief Executive Officer. During his twenty-year tenure with Coeur, Mr. Krebs has led nearly $2 billion in capital raising and debt restructuring activities and has facilitated over $2 billion of acquisitions and divestitures. Mr. Krebs was previously Coeur‘s Chief Financial Officer and held various positions in the corporate development department, including Senior Vice President of Corporate Development. Mr. Krebs is a Director of Kansas City Southern and the National Mining Association, is on the Board of World Business Chicago, and was formerly President of the Silver Institute.

Thomas S. Whelan – Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Coeur, Mr. Whelan served as CFO of Arizona Mining Inc. from September 2017 to August 2018, when the company was acquired from South32 Limited. Previously, Mr. Whelan served as CFO for Nevsun Resources Ltd. from January 2014 to August 2017. He is a chartered professional accountant and was previously a partner with the international accounting firm Ernst & Young (“EY”) LLP where he was the EY Global Mining & Metals Assurance sector leader, the leader of the EY Assurance practice in Vancouver and previously EY’s Canadian Mining & Metals sector leader. Mr. Whelan graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce from Queen’s University.

Michael “Mick” Routledge – Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Routledge has over 20 years’ experience with Rio Tinto in various roles beginning in 1987, including as the Chief Operating Officer (2011-2012) and Vice President HSE, Projects & Operational Value (2012-2014) of the Kennecott Utah Copper mine and served as the Chief Operating Officer of Asahi Refining from 2015 to 2017. As the Senior Director of Operational Excellence at Anagold Madencilik from 2017 to 2019, Mr. Routledge designed and implemented an operational excellence program for the Copler District in Turkey. Most recently, Mr. Routledge served as the Vice President of Major Projects and Studies of Alacer Gold Corp. since 2019. Mr. Routledge currently chairs the Health & Safety Division Executive Committee for the Society for Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration board. He received an undergraduate degree from the University of Sunderland, England in Electrical and Control Engineeringandreceivedhis MBA with a focus on business and strategic transformation from Henley Management College in England.

Terry F.D. Smith. – Senior Vice President and Chief Development Officer. Mr. Smith joined Coeur in 2013 as the Vice President of North American Operations. Prior to joining Coeur, he served as Vice President of Project Development and Assessments of Hunter Dickenson Inc. Mr. Smith has managed projects ranging from scoping to the feasibility level, coordinated field investigations, metallurgy laboratory testing, and engineering design. He also has significant experience in strategic project planning and due diligence reviews for potential acquisitions including environmental, metallurgical, geotechnical and mining inputs. Mr. Smith has also served as Manager of Operations Support for Barrick Gold Corporation in Toronto and as Senior Mining Engineer for Teck Cominco Ltd. in Vancouver. Mr. Smith holds a Bachelor of Mining Engineering from Laurentian University in Sudbury, Ontario.

Casey M. Nault – Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary. Mr. Nault has over 20 years of experience as a corporate and securities lawyer, including prior in- house positions with Starbucks Corporation and Washington Mutual, Inc. and law firm experience with Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. His experience includes securities compliance and SEC reporting, corporate governance and compliance, mergers and acquisitions, public and private securities offerings, other strategic transactions, general regulatory compliance, cross-border issues, land use and environmental issues, and overseeing complex litigation.

Hans J. Rasmussen – Senior Vice President, Exploration. Mr. Rasmussen has 30 years of experience in the mining business, 16 years of which were with senior producers Newmont Mining and Kennecott/Rio Tinto; as well as serving as a consultant for senior producers such as BHP, Teck-Cominco, and Quadra Mining. From 2004 to 2013, he was an officer or served on the Board of Directors of several junior public exploration companies with gold and silver projects in Quebec, Nevada, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Bolivia, including serving on the Board of Directors of Atex Resources Inc. (formerly known as Columbia Crest Gold Corp.) since 2006.

Emilie C. Schouten – Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Ms. Schouten has 15 years of experience in Human Resources, starting her career in General Electric, where she graduated from GE’s Human Resources Leadership Program. After 6 years as an HR Manager with GE, her division was acquired by the world’s largest electrical distribution company, Rexel, and Ms. Schouten went on to become the Director of Training and Development. Ms. Schouten has her B.A. in Sociology from Michigan State University and her M.S. in Industrial Labor Relations from University of Wisconsin-Madison.

NYSE: CDE 106

JC 2016 Board of Directors

Robert E. Mellor – Independent Chairman of the board of Monro Muffler/Brake, Inc. (auto service provider) since June 2017, and appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer in August 2020. Previously Mr. Mellor was lead independent director from April 2011 to June 2017 and a member of the board of directors since August 2010; Former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Building Materials Holding Corporation (distribution, manufacturing and sales of building materials and component products) from 1997 to January 2010, director from 1991 to January 2010; former member of the board of directors of CalAtlantic Group, Inc. (national residential home builder) from October 2015 to February 2018, when CalAtlantic was acquired by Lennar Corporation; former member of the board of directors of the Ryland Group (national home builder, merged with another builder to form CalAtlantic) from 1999 to October 2015; and former member of the board of directors of Stock Building Supply Holdings, Inc. (lumber and building materials distributor) from March 2010 until December 2015 when it merged with another company. He was recently named a 2020 National Association of Corporate Directors Directorship 100 honoree.

Mitchell J. Krebs – President and Chief Executive Officer. See prior slide.

Linda L. Adamany – Member of the board of directors of Jefferies Financial Group (formerly known as Leucadia National Corporation), a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, since March 2014, and a member of the board of directors of Jefferies Group Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jefferies Financial Group Inc., since November 2018; non-executive director of BlackRock Institutional Trust Company since March 2018; non-executive director of the Wood plc from October 2017 to May 2019; non- executive director of Amec Foster Wheeler plc, an engineering, project management, and consultancy company, from October 2012 until the Company was acquired by Wood plc in October 2017; member of the board of directors of National Grid plc, an electricity and gas generation, transmission, and distribution company, from November 2006 to November 2012. Served at BP plc in several capacities from July 1980 until her retirement in August 2007, most recently from April 2005 to August 2007 as a member of the five-person Refining & Marketing Executive Committee responsible for overseeing the day-to-day operations and human resource management of BP plc's Refining & Marketing segment, a $45 billion business at the time. She was recently selected as one of Women Inc. Magazine's 2018 Most Influential Corporate Directors.

Sebastian Edwards – Henry Ford II Professor of International Business Economics at the Anderson Graduate School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) from 1996 to present; Co-Director of the National Bureau of Economic Research’s Africa Project from 2009 to present; taught at IAE Universidad Austral in Argentina and at the Kiel Institute from 2000 to 2004; Chief Economist for Latin America at the World Bank Group from 1993 to 1996. Currently a Member of the Board of Moneda Asset Management, an investment management firm in Chile, and Centro de Estudios Públicos, Chile.

Randolph E. Gress – Retired Chairman (November 2006 until January 2016 and director from August 2004 until January 2016) and Chief Executive Officer (from 2004 until December 2015) of Innophos Holdings, Inc., a leading international producer of performance-critical and nutritional specialty ingredients for the food, beverage, dietary supplements, pharmaceutical, and industrial end markets. Mr. Gress was with Innophos since its formation in 2004, when Bain Capital purchased RhodiaSA'sNorthAmerican specialty phosphate business. Prior to his time at Innophos, Mr. Gress was with Rhodia since 1997 and held various positions including Global President of Specialty Phosphates (with two years based in the U.K.) and Vice-President and General Manager of the NA Sulfuric Acid and Regeneration businesses. From 1982 to 1997, Mr. Gress served in various roles at FMC Corporation including Corporate Strategy and various manufacturing, marketing, and supply chain positions.

Eduardo Luna – Chairman of the Board of Rochester Resources Ltd., Mr. Luna has spent over forty years in the precious metals mining industry and has held prior senior executive and board positions at several companies including Industrial Peñoles, Goldcorp Inc., Luismin SA de CV, Wheaton River Minerals Ltd., Alamos Gold Inc., Dyna Resource, Inc. and Primero Mining Corp. He is currently the Chairman of the board of directors of Rochester Resources Ltd., a junior natural resources company with assetsinMexico.Heisalsoa member of the Board of Directors of Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. Mr. Luna is the former President of the Mexican Mining Chamber and a former President oftheSilverInstitute. He was recently inducted into the Mexico Mining Hall of Fame and serves as Chairman of the Advisory Board of the Faculty of Mines at the University of Guanajuato where he received a degree in Mining Engineering.

NYSE: CDE 107

JC 2016 Board of Directors (cont.)

Jessica L. McDonald – Ms. McDonald has extensive leadership experience in both the public and private sectors and currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Hydro One Limited. She served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of BC Hydro and Power Authority, a clean energy utility with over $5.5 billioninannualrevenuesand more than 5,000 employees, from May 2014 to July 2017. She was the Chair of Canada Post Corporation from December 2017 to July 2020 and was interim President and Chief Executive Officer from April 2018 until March 2019. From October 2017 to March 2020, she was a member of the Board of Directors of Trevali Mining Corporation and served as Chair from March 2019 to March 2020. Since 1991, Ms. McDonald has held many senior positions in the British Columbia provincial government, including Deputy Minister to the Premier, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the BC Public Service. She has been selected as a Mentor at the Trudeau Foundation and named to Canada’s Top 100 Most Powerful Women Hall of Fame. She also recently became a visiting fellow at Stanford University's Center for Energy Policy and Finance and was recently appointed to the Member Council of Sustainable Development Technology Canada.

John H. Robinson – Chairman of Hamilton Ventures LLC since founding the firm in 2006. Chief Executive Officer of Nowa Technology, Inc. (development and marketing of environmentally sustainable wastewater treatment technology) from 2013 to 2014. Chairman of EPC Global, Ltd. (engineering staffing company) from 2003 to 2004. Executive Director of Amey plc (British business process outsourcing company) from 2000 to 2002. Vice Chairman of Black & Veatch Inc. (engineering and construction) from 1998 to 2000. Mr. Robinson began his career at Black & Veatch and was Managing Partner prior to becoming Vice Chairman. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Alliance Resource Partners, L.P. (coal mining) and Olsson Associates (engineering consulting). He was a member of the Board of Directors of Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (financial Services) from 2007 to 2019.

J. Kenneth Thompson – Chairman of Pioneer Natural Resources Company (oil and gas) and member of the board of directors of Alaska Air Group, Inc. (parent company of Alaska Airlines, Virgin America Airlines and Horizon Air), presiding (Lead) Director of Tetra Tech, Inc. (engineering consulting). President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Star Energy LLC (private energy investment firm in Alaska) from September 2000 to present, with a principal holding in Alaska Venture Capital Group LLC (private oil and gas exploration company) from December 2004 to present; Executive Vice President of ARCO’s Asia Pacific oil and gas operating companies in Alaska, California, Indonesia, China, and Singapore from 1998 to 2000.

NYSE: CDE 108

JC 2016 Contact Information

Corporate Office Coeur Mining, Inc. 104 S. Michigan Ave., Suite 900 Chicago, IL 60603

Main Telephone +1 (312) 489-5800

Stock Ticker CDE: NYSE

Website www.coeur.com

Contact Paul DePartout Director, Investor Relations [email protected]

NYSE: CDE 109

JC 2016