DOCSLIB.ORG

Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey (NHIES) 2015/2016 Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey (NHIES) 2015/2016 Report 1 Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey (NHIES) 2015/2016 Report $ 2 Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey (NHIES) 2015/2016 Report Mission Statement “Leveraging on partnerships and innovative technologies, to produce and disseminate relevant, quality, timely statistics and spatial data that are fit-for-purpose in accordance with international standards and best practice” Vision Statement “To be a high performance institution in quality statistics delivery” Core Values Integrity Excellent Performance Accuracy Team Work Accountability Transparency 3 Namibia Statistics Agency Tel: +264 61 431 3200 Email: [email protected] P.O. Box 2133, FGI House, Post Street Mall, Fax: +264 61 431 3253 www.nsa.org.na Windhoek, Namibia 4 Namibia Household Income and Expenditure Survey (NHIES) 2015/2016 Report Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Foreword ......................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 12 1. Survey Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.2 Survey Objectives............................................................... .............................................................................................. 16 1.3 Sample Design................................................................................................................................................................... 16 1.4 Definitions ......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 1.5 Response Rate................................................................................................................................................................... 20 1.6 Consultation With Stakeholders ...................................................................................................................................... 21 1.7 The Questionnaires ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 1.8 Pilot Survey ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 1.9 Field Organization ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 1.10 Training ............................................................................................................................................................................ 23 1.11 Survey Publicity and Advocacy ....................................................................................................................................... 24 1.12 Data Collection ................................................................................................................................................................ 24 1.13 Survey Monitoring (Data Quality Control) ..................................................................................................................... 24 1.14 Data Processing .............................................................................................................................................................. 25 1.15 In-field Automated listing and Sampling Program ........................................................................................................ 26 1.16 Case Management Program .......................................................................................................................................... 26 1.17 Data Entry ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 1.18 Data Synchronization ..................................................................................................................................................... 26 1.19 Post Data Processing Programs ...................................................................................................................................... 27 1.20 Data Validation ................................................................................................................................................................ 27 1.21 Other Checks................................................................................................................................................................... 28 1.22 Data Analysis ................................................................................................................................................................... 31 2. Demographic Characteristics .......................................................................................................................................... 32 2.1 Households and Population ............................................................................................................................................. 32 2.2 Population by Age and Sex ............................................................................................................................................... 33 2.3 Households and Orphanhood .......................................................................................................................................... 37 5 Contents 3. Housing and Utilities ...................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.1 Types of Dwelling Units .................................................................................................................................................... 42 3.2 Materials Used for Dwellings ........................................................................................................................................... 48 3.3 Type of Tenure .................................................................................................................................................................. 50 3.4 Sources of Energy ............................................................................................................................................................. 51 3.5 Main Source of Drinking Water ........................................................................................................................................ 54 3.6 Disposal of Child Stools..................................................................................................................................................... 60 3.7 Selected Indicators on Housing Condition....................................................................................................................... 60 4. Access to Services .......................................................................................................................................................... 62 4.1 Time to Drinking Water .................................................................................................................................................... 62 4.2 Distance to Health Facilities ............................................................................................................................................. 64 4.3 Distance to Banking Facilities ........................................................................................................................................... 64 4.4 Distance to Public Transport ............................................................................................................................................ 65 4.5 Distance to Primary School .............................................................................................................................................. 66 5. Education ....................................................................................................................................................................... 68 5.1 Literacy .............................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Scraping the Pot”: San in Namibia Two Decades After Independence Bibliography
    Annex Annex A: Sites visited for the field research Region # of sites Sites Date Caprivi (eastern) 5 Marakavan, Bito, Waya Waya, Kyarecan and Mulanga 5-12 August 2012 Caprivi (western 4 Omega 1, Mushashane and Mushangara 23-31 October 2011 – i.e. Bwabwata National Park) Mashambo 31 May 2012 Kavango 4 Likwaterera and Wiwi 10-18 April 2012 Xeidang and Ndama 1-9 May 2012 Oshana 1 Okaukuejo 8-12 December 2011 Kunene 1 Outjo (Etosha Poort) 6-9 February 2012 Oshikoto 3 Oshivelo 16-20 July 2012 Tsintsabis and Farm Six (both visited twice) 16-18 April 2012 and 28-30 June 2012 Ohangwena 6 Ekoka and Ouholamo 22-29 April 2012 Oshikoha and Onane 21-28 May 2012 Omukukutu and Omiishi 18-25 June 2012 Omaheke 6 Skoonheid October 2011 Gobabis (Epako) 14-17 February 2012 Blouberg 2-5 April 2012 Corridors 13 and 17 3-9 June 2012 Otjinene 9-12 September 2012 Omusati 4 Okatseidhi and Amarika 3-10 July 2012 Okathakanguti and Okapya 18-26 September 2012 Otjozondjupa 8 Tsumkwe and Nyae Nyae Conservancy (||Xa|hoba and 7-15 November 2011 N‡animh) N‡a Jaqna Conservancy (Mangetti Dune, Luhebo and 30 January to Omatako) 5 February 2012 Vergenoeg 21-23 July 2012 Uitkoms 22 July 2012 Total 42 Field research period: 23 October 2011 to 26 September 2012 Bibliography 631 Annex B: Stakeholder interviews Name of Interviewee Institution and/or position Date Place Windhoek (Khomas Region) Lara Diez, Wendy Viall Nyae Nyae Development Foundation of Namibia (NNDFN) 7/12/2011 NNDFN office Sam Mayinoti Independent consultant 2/10/2012 LAC office Aaron Classe Office of the Prime Minister (OPM), Division of San Development 31/1/2013 OPM John Walters Ombudsman Namibia 25/2/2013 Office of the Ombudsman Nelago S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of the Resettlement Programme on Sustainable
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE RESETTLEMENT PROGRAMME ON SUSTAINABLE LIVELIHOODS OF SMALL – SCALE COMMERCIAL FARMERS IN MARIENTAL RURAL CONSTITUENCY OF THE HARDAP REGION, NAMIBIA A THESIS SUBMITED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF EDUCATION (ADULT EDUCATION) OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAMIBIA BY JEFTA VATUNA NGAVETENE 2001 00 580 OCTOBER 2019 SUPERVISOR: DR M. HAMUNYELA I ABSTRACT At independence, Namibia was confronted with a skewed land tenure system where the minority owned vast productive land (Juach et al., 2013). To avoid losing land to dominant locals and rich occupants the government established the Ministry of Lands and Resettlement to be responsible for the process of land reform and resettlement. As a result, the resettlement programme was established to assist in addressing social injustices and to improve the lives of those who are encircled by poverty. A resettlement programme is a developmental approach aimed at the alleviation of poverty and to uplift people’s livelihoods. This study investigated the contribution of Land Reform and Resettlement Programme (LRRP) on sustainable livelihoods of small-scale livestock commercial farmers in the Mariental Rural Constituency of Hardap Region. The study used a case study design of the qualitative approach to capture the reality of the small-scale livestock commercial farmers’ lived experiences of and thoughts about the resettlement programme, its intended purpose and benefits to them. The study revealed that the programme beneficiaries have managed to accumulate assets they did not have before they were resettled. The researcher assessed the lives of resettled farmers and remarkable improvement was observed and tangible assets were evident.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiparty Democracy and Elections in Namibia
    MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ––––––––––––– ❑ ––––––––––––– Published with the assistance of NORAD and OSISA ISBN 1-920095-02-0 Debie LeBeau 9781920 095024 Edith Dima Order from: [email protected] EISA RESEARCH REPORT No 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 i MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA ii EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 iii MULTIPARTY DEMOCRACY AND ELECTIONS IN NAMIBIA BY DEBIE LEBEAU EDITH DIMA 2005 iv EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 Published by EISA 2nd Floor, The Atrium 41 Stanley Avenue, Auckland Park Johannesburg, South Africa 2006 P O Box 740 Auckland Park 2006 South Africa Tel: 27 11 482 5495 Fax: 27 11 482 6163 Email: [email protected] www.eisa.org.za ISBN: 1-920095-02-0 EISA All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of EISA. First published 2005 EISA is a non-partisan organisation which seeks to promote democratic principles, free and fair elections, a strong civil society and good governance at all levels of Southern African society. –––––––––––– ❑ –––––––––––– Cover photograph: Yoruba Beaded Sashes Reproduced with the kind permission of Hamill Gallery of African Art, Boston, MA USA EISA Research Report, No. 13 EISA RESEARCH REPORT NO 13 v CONTENTS List of acronyms viii Acknowledgements x Preface xi 1. Background to multiparty democracy in Namibia 1 Historical background 1 The electoral system and its impact on gender 2 The ‘characters’ of the multiparty system 5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A/HRC/23/36/Add.1
    United Nations A/HRC/23/36/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 17 May 2013 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-third session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights, Ms. Magdalena Sepúlveda Carmona Addendum Mission to Namibia (1 to 8 October 2012)* ** Summary The Special Rapporteur on extreme poverty and human rights carried out a mission to the Republic of Namibia from 1 to 8 October 2012, in accordance with Human Rights Council resolutions 8/11 and 17/13. In the present report she presents her findings and recommendations regarding the protection and promotion of the rights of people living in poverty and social exclusion in Namibia. The report recognizes the immense levels of inequality that existed at independence as a legacy of colonial rule. While acknowledging the compounded challenges faced by Namibia – including limited institutional capacity, and the fact that Namibia has one of the world’s lowest population densities – it concludes that progress has not been fast enough. There are still unacceptable levels of inequality along the lines of gender, race, region, ethnicity and class. The report provides specific recommendations to ensure that policies and programmes reach the poorest of the poor, enabling them to enjoy their human rights on an equal basis with the rest of the population. * The summary of the present report is circulated in all official languages. The report itself, which is annexed to the summary, is circulated in the language of submission only.
    [Show full text]
  • (MDR) Tuberculosis in Ohangwena Region, Namibia
    Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia Johannes Ndeutapo Hango Namibia 45th International Course in Health Development September 22, 2008 œ September 11, 2009 KIT (ROYAL TROPICAL INSTITUTE) Development Policy & Practice/ Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam itle Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Public Health by Johannes Ndeutapo Hango Namibia Declaration: Where other people‘s work has been used (either from printed source, internet or any other source) this has been carefully acknowledged and referenced in accordance with departmental requirements. This thesis Prevention of development and spread of Multi-Drug Resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Ohangwena region, Namibia is my own work. Signature: _______________ 45th International Course in Health Development (ICHD) September 22, 2008 œ September 11, 2009 KIT (Royal Tropical Institute)/ Vrije University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands September 2009 Organized by: KIT (Royal Tropical Institute), Development Policy & Practice Amsterdam, The Netherlands In co-operation with: Vrije University Amsterdam/ free University of Amsterdam (VU) Amsterdam, The Netherlands Dedication This work is dedicated to my wife Josephine, son Joy and two daughters Jane and Janet / [ [ ! ! L / . Ç Ç b Ç / t $ h $ D $ Ç. h / t t ( W *w ( $ ! , - $ ! - $ { , - / { 0 - ( a - - L 2 2 [ 2 3 Y 2 /I!tÇ9w " C$ $ % $ C a *ó5w8Ç. 9 $ Ç : a ; $ I $$ 9 / $ w a *ó5w8Ç. $ { $ ! >0 8 /*5{Ç? $ $ ! > ? $ $ / Ü 0 $ $ ( w a 5w8Ç. $ $$ / a *ó5w8Ç. b / $$ { / $$ ! >0 8 /*5{Ç? ( $$$ ! > ? - $$/ Ü 0 - $$( w a 5w8Ç.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary National Review
    IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS VOLUNTARY NATIONAL REVIEW TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTS OF ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................................ 4 FOREWORD .........................................................................................................................5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................9 NAMIBIA’S DEVELOPMENT CONTEXT AND THE SDGs ........................................10 ASSESSING THE MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SDGs ...................................11 Creating Ownership at all levels: ..................................................................................... 11 Alignment of SDGs with the National Vision and National Development Planning .......................................................................................................... 11 Institutional Mechanisms for SDG implementation, coordination, review and reporting .............................................................................................................. 11 Tracking Progress: Status of selected SDGs in Namibia .................................... 12 EVALUATING POLICIES AND STRATEGIES .............................................................. 43 CONCLUSION AND WAY FORWARD .......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Namibia State of the Region Address Hardap Region 28 July 2021, Mariental
    Republic of Namibia State of the Region Address Hardap Region 28 July 2021, Mariental The Governor HONOURABLE REVEREND SALOMON MENTHOS APRIL 1 Honorable Dausab, Chairperson of Hardap Regional Council Honorable Regional Councilors present Your Worship Kuhlmann, the Mayor of Mariental Municipality and All Local Authority Councilors present The Acting Chief Regional Officer All management cadres and representatives from all Line Ministries The Acting Regional Commander of the Namibian Police Officer in Charge of Hardap Correctional facilities Chief Executive Officers of All Local Authorities Distinguished Traditional Leaders Inhabitants of the Great Hardap Region Members of the Media Viewers and listeners on different media platforms Ladies and Gentlemen Honourable Chairperson, I would like to thank you for convening a Special Session of Council to allow us to execute the mandate entrusted upon us by Article 110A subsection (5) and (6) of the Constitution of the Republic of Namibia, to present a State of the Region Address (SoRA). In this report, I will present the following aspects crosscutting all sectors: Effective governance through improved community-based planning, tourism, agriculture, education, health, safety and security, gender and housing In order to promote Effective governance through Community Based Planning I held a meeting in May 2020, with the Constituency Councillors and the Local Authorities, to review annual budgets and development plans. A key outcome was that we need to pro-actively set long term development targets. 2 Similarly, external resource mobilisation, Public-Private-Partnership and revenue collection should be enhanced in good faith to improve livelihood of our fellow citizens. It was also emphasised that the needs and opportunities identified at local authority and constituency level, must inform the overall strategic plan of the Hardap Regional Council, in order to ensure bottom-up participatory planning.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 / 12 B. Political Pluralism and Participation: 11 / 16
    Namibia https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/namibia A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 10 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The president is both chief of state and head of government, and is directly elected for up to two five-year terms. In the 2014 election, Hage Geingob defeated numerous rivals for the presidency, winning 87 percent of the vote. The polls were deemed competitive and credible by election observers, though some logistical glitches with electronic voting machines were reported. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 3 / 4 The National Council, the upper chamber of the bicameral Parliament, is comprised of 42 seats, with members appointed by regional councils for six-year terms. The lower house, the National Assembly, has 96 seats filled by popular election for five- year terms using party-list proportional representation. The 2014 polls were seen as competitive and credible by election observers, though some logistical glitches with electronic voting machines were reported. SWAPO won 80 percent of the vote, giving it 77 National Assembly seats. The Democratic Turnhalle Alliance of Namibia (DTA) followed, winning 4.8 percent of the vote for 5 seats, and eight additional parties won the remaining seats. While voter intimidation was not reported, opposition parties had some difficulty achieving visibility due to the dominance of SWAPO, which some observers said was reinforced by provisions of the Third Constitutional Amendment. A3. Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 3 / 4 The 2014 polls were the first held under the Third Constitutional Amendment, which increased the number of members in Namibia’s bicameral legislature by 40 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Kunene Regional Development Profile 2015
    Kunene Regional Council Kunene Regional Development Profile2015 The Ultimate Frontier Foreword 1 Foreword The Kunene Regional Devel- all regional stakeholders. These issues inhabitants and wildlife, but to areas opment Profile is one of the include, rural infrastructural develop- beyond our region, through exploring regional strategic documents ment, poverty and hunger, unemploy- and exposing everything Kunene has which profiles who we are as ment, especially youth, regional eco- to offer. the Great Kunene Region, what nomic growth, HIV/AIDS pandemic, I believe that if we rally together as a we can offer in terms of current domestic or gender based violence and team, the aspirations and ambitions of service delivery (strengths), our illegal poaching of our wildlife. our inhabitants outlined in this docu- regional economic perform- ment can be easily transformed into ances, opportunities, challenges It must be understood clearly to all of successful implementation of socio and and constraints. us as inhabitants of this Great Kunene, economic development in our region, and Namibians at large, that our re- which will guarantee job creation, In my personal capacity as the Region- gional vision has been aligned with our economic growth, peace and political al Governor of Kunene Region and a national vision. Taking into account stability. Regional Political Head Representative the current impact of development in of the government, I strongly believe our region, we have a lot that we need With these remarks, it is my honor and that the initiation
    [Show full text]
  • Kunene Toolkit
    LET’S ACT TO ADAPT Dealing with Climate Change A community information toolkit on adaptation A resource package developed for farmers and natural resource users in the Kunene Region, Namibia September 2011 A project implemented by the Ministry of Environment & Tourism LET’S ACT TO ADAPT • Dealing with Climate Change Page 1 Africa Adaptation Programme – Namibia Project (AAP-NAM) implemented by the Ministry of Environment and Tourism Prepared by: Integrated Environmental Consultants Namibia (IECN) Integrated Environmental Consultants Namibia Artwork by: Nicky Marais Layout by: Haiko Bruns English version edited by: WordNet Otjiherero translation by: Nathanael K. Mbaeva Nama/Damara translation by: Laurentius Davids Printed by: John Meinert Printing (Pty) Ltd ISBN 978-99945-0-025-3 Funded by the Government of Japan through UNDP Acknowledgements: The development of this toolkit draws heavily from a large number of consultations and reviews. Farmers and Regional Council representatives of selected constituencies in the Kunene Region of Namibia are thanked for their participation and vigorous inputs. For Kunene Region consultations took place in Opuwo and Kamanjab constituencies. Page 2 LET’S ACT TO ADAPT • Dealing with Climate Change Contents Why is climate change an important issue for farmers and natural resource users in the Kunene Region? ...........................................................................................................................................4 About this information toolkit ................................................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Namibia 2004 New BU Mich
    Copyright © August 2004 Government of the Republic of Namibia The results and content of this report may be reproduced in parts with acknowledgement of sources. Published by: The National Planning Commission Government Office Park Private Bag 13356 Windhoek Namibia Tel : 264 61 283 4111 Printed in Namibia by John Meinert Printing Design and layout by Ogilvy Namibia Photos courtesy of United Nations, Namibia Foreword Namibia was proud to serve as President of the UN General Assembly during the Millennium Summit in New York in 2000. The Summit was a landmark occasion that brought together an unprecedented number of nations to form a global consensus on the challenges facing humanity and, more importantly, on what needs to be done to overcome these challenges. The resulting Millennium Declaration, subsequently signed by all UN member states including Namibia, says: “We will spare no effort to free our fellow men, women and children from the abject and dehumanising conditions of extreme poverty, to which more than a billion of them are currently subjected. We are committed to making the right to development a reality for everyone and to freeing the entire human race from want.” The finalisation of this first report on Namibia’s national progress towards the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) coincides with the launch of the country’s long-term Vision 2030, which will guide us towards a future of Prosperity, Harmony, Peace and Political Stability. The MDGs form a critical part of our nation’s efforts to monitor progress towards the realisation of this Vision. This report shows that since our Independence in 1990 we have made many great achievements; for instance, in providing education and healthcare, water and sanitation, and managing our economic and natural resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimated Burden of Fungal Infections in Namibia
    Journal of Fungi Article Estimated Burden of Fungal Infections in Namibia Cara M. Dunaiski 1,* and David W. Denning 2 1 Department of Health and Applied Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology, 13 Jackson Kaujeua Street, Windhoek 9000, Namibia 2 National Aspergillosis Centre, Wythenshawe Hospital and the University of Manchester, Manchester M23 9LT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +264 61 207 2891 Received: 30 June 2019; Accepted: 13 August 2019; Published: 16 August 2019 Abstract: Namibia is a sub-Saharan country with one of the highest HIV infection rates in the world. Although care and support services are available that cater for opportunistic infections related to HIV, the main focus is narrow and predominantly aimed at tuberculosis. We aimed to estimate the burden of serious fungal infections in Namibia, currently unknown, based on the size of the population at risk and available epidemiological data. Data were obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO), Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), and published reports. When no data existed, risk populations were used to estimate the frequencies of fungal infections, using the previously described methodology. The population of Namibia in 2011 was estimated at 2,459,000 and 37% were children. Among approximately 516,390 adult women, recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis ( 4 episodes /year) is estimated to occur in 37,390 (3003/100,000 females). Using a low international ≥ average rate of 5/100,000, we estimated 125 cases of candidemia, and 19 patients with intra-abdominal candidiasis. Among survivors of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) in Namibia 2017, 112 new cases of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) are likely, a prevalence of 354 post-TB and a total prevalence estimate of 453 CPA patients in all.
    [Show full text]