Note on Identity and Distribution of Cynometra Iripa Kostel. and C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Note on Identity and Distribution of Cynometra Iripa Kostel. and C 13 6 805 Ragavan et al NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 13 (6): 805–812 https://doi.org/10.15560/13.6.805 Note on identity and distribution of Cynometra iripa Kostel. and C. ramiflora L. (Fabaceae) in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India P. Ragavan,1 T. S. Rana,2 K. Ravichandran,3 R. S. C. Jayaraj,4 K. Sivakumar,5 Alok Saxena,3 P. M. Mohan6 1 SERB, National Post Doctoral Fellow, CSIR, National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Post Box No. 436, Lucknow 226001, India. 2 CSIR, National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Post Box No. 436, Lucknow 226001, India. 3 Department of Environment and Forest, Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Port Blair-744102, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. 4 Rain Forest Research Institute, Jorhat-785010, Assam, India. 5 Centre for Advances studies in Marine Biology, Annamalai University, Parengipettai, Tamil Nadu, India. 6 Department of Ocean Studies and Marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Brookshabad Campus, Port Blair-744112, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Corresponding author: P. Ragavan, [email protected] Abstract The present study revealed the identity and distribution of Cynometra iripa and C. ramiflora in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Of these, C. iripa is often classified as true mangrove species, whereas C. ramiflora is a man- grove associate. Apex of leaflets, length of inflorescences, length of pedicels, apex of anthers and position of fruit beak are distinguishing key characters between C. iripa and C. ramiflora. Photographs, a key to the species, and notes on nomenclatural ambiguity are provided. Key words Cynometra spp; Andaman and Nicobar Islands; mangroves; distribution. Academic editor: Amit Kumar | Received 15 September 2017 | Accepted 24 October 2017 | Published 17 November 2017 Citation: Ragavan P, Rana TS, Ravichandran K, Jayaraj RSC, Sivakumar K, Saxena A, Mohan PM (2017) Note on identity and distribution of Cynometra iripa Kostel. and C. ramiflora L. (Fabaceae) in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. Check List 13 (6): 805–812. https://doi. org/10.15560/13.6.805 Introduction problematic as C. iripa was considered as a variety of C. ramiflora in the past (Meeuwen 1970). Cymorium sylves- The genus Cynometra L. (Fabaceae) consists of about tre of Rumphius (1741: pl. 63) was described as Cynometra 85 species distributed in the tropical regions (Mabber- ramiflora by Linnaeus (1753), which is characterized by ley 2008). The genus is characterised by unijugate or unijugate leaves. Iripa of Rheede (1682: pl. 31) was bi jugate leaves, small bud scales, 4 calyx lobes, 5 petals, described as Cynometra iripa by Kosteletzky (1835), 10 stamens, and 1-seeded fruits. In India, Cynometra is which is characterized by bijugate leaves. However, most represented by 7 species: C. beddomei Prain, C. bourdil- of the subsequent botanists described Cynometra iripa as lonii Gamble, C. iripa Kostel., C. malaccensis Meeuwen, varietal form of C. ramiflora. For instance, Prain (1897) C. ramiflora L., C. travancorica Bedd., and C. cauliflora described 2 subspecies of C. ramiflora, subsp. gen- L. (Sanjappa 1992). Of these, taxonomical identity and uina (unijugate form) and subsp. bijuga (bijugate form), distribution of C. ramiflora and C. iripa have often been based on number of leaflets. Furthermore, he recognized Copyright Ragavan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 806 Check List 13 (6) 2 varieties of subsp. bijuga based on leaflet size and tip including A & N Islands. Kathiresan (2008) reported the shape: var. mimosoides (smaller leaflets with obtuse tip) occurrence of both C. ramiflora and C. iripa from the and var. heterophylla (larger leaflets with acute to acumi- Sundarbans, Odisha and A & N Islands and only C. iripa nate leaflets). Thus, it is noteworthy that Prain described from Maharashtra. Mandal and Naskar (2008) reported the bijugate form of C. ramiflora as var. heterophylla and the occurrence of only C. ramiflora in all the mangrove unijugate as subsp. genuina, whereas var. mimosoides habitats of India, except Lakshadweep, without descrip- was used to describe C. iripa. Subsequently, Prain (1903) tion and locality data. Hence, keeping all the previous separated var. mimosoides from C. ramiflora and treated it studies in view, present study was undertaken with the as a distinct species. From this, it is apparent that C. iripa objective to resolve the nomenclatural ambiguity of C. was placed as distinct species by Prain (1903) and var. iripa and C. ramiflora in the A & N Islands and to docu- heterophylla and subsp. genuina (i.e., the unijugate and ment their distribution. bijugate forms of C. ramiflora respectively) were placed under C. ramiflora L. In the taxonomical revision of the Methods genus Cynometra, Meeuwen (1970) also treated “subsp. genuina” and “subsp. heterophylla” as synonyms of C. Recent floristic study on species diversity and distribu- ramiflora and “var. mimosoides” and “subsp. bijuga” are tion of mangroves of the A & N Islands revealed the treated as synonyms of C. iripa. Further, he also noted occurrences of 2 species of Cynometra, C. iripa and C. that “for no obvious reason, C. iripa was considered in ramiflora.Specimens were collected to assess the numeric the past as a variety of C. ramiflora and it is entirely dif- and multistate attributes of a wide range of vegetative and ferent from C. ramiflora; the only character they share reproductive morphological characters and were identi- is a deeply rugose pod, but even the shape of the pod fied using regional floras (Baker 1878, Brandis 1906, is different”. Ding Hou et al. (1996) also described the Prain 1903, Parkinson 1923), monographs (Meeuwen Cynometra species in Flora Malesiana based on the taxo- 1970, Prain 1897), and standard references (Tomlinson nomical revision of Meeuwen (1970). 1986, Giesen et al. 2006). Collected specimens were also Both C. iripa and C. ramiflora were known from Anda- compared with specimens deposited at the Andaman and man and Nicobar Islands (A & N Islands). However, the Nicobar Regional Centre, Botanical Survey of India, Port identity and distribution of C. iripa and C. ramiflora are far Blair (PBL) and electronic resources such as the Angio- from complete. For instance, in Forest flora of Andamans, sperm Phylogeny Website (Stevens 2001), Tropicos of Parkinson (1923) reported 2 varieties of Cynometra rami- Missouri Botanical Garden, REMIB (World Biodiversity flora—var. heterophylla and var. mimosoides. He further Information Network), Kew Herbarium Database, Global emphasized that terminal leaflets are much larger than the Plants Initiative, ePIC (electronic Plant Information Cen- lower and acute in var. heterophylla, whereas in var. mimo- tre 2002), and IPNI (The International Plant Names Index soides terminal leaflets are hardly larger than the lower and 2012). Voucher specimens of C. iripa (Accession No. obtuse. He also pointed out that the former one was very 30939, 30940) and C. ramiflora (Accession No. 30941, rare and latter was most common behind the mangrove 30942) have been deposited at PBL. swamps in the Andaman Islands. Those notes clearly indi- cated that his var. heterophylla was C. ramiflora and var. mimosoides was C. iripa. Subsequent to Parkinson (1923), Results C. ramiflora and C. iripa are reported by Dagar (1987), Of the 51 sites surveyed, C. iripa was recorded at 29 Dagar et al. (1991), Dagar and Singh (1999), and Debnath sites in the Andaman Islands, whereas few individuals (2004). Among them, Dagar (1987) and Dagar et al. (1991) of C. ramiflora were recorded from Chidiyatapu, South classified both the species as true mangroves and noted Andaman (Fig. 1). None of them was recorded from the that C. ramiflora is common in the A & N Islands and C. Nicobar Islands. Taxonomical description and photo- iripa is rare, whereas Debnath (2004) classified these spe- plates of C. iripa and C. ramiflora of A & N Islands has cies as mangrove associates and noted that C. ramiflora is also been provided to facilitate identification. The distin- very rare and C. iripa is common everywhere behind the guishing key characters of both the species are given in mangrove swamps. Dagar and Singh (1999) reported C. Table 1. iripa and 3 varieties of C. ramiflora—var. heterophylla, var. bijuga, and var. mimosoides—but the descriptions are Key to existing species of Cynometra species in the not clear. Further, none of them have given locality data for A & N Islands C. ramiflora in the A & N Islands. 1a Leaves 2-jugate, upper leaflets not much unequal; In the bibliographic and distributional account on rachis of inflorescences 0.2–0.35 cm long; flowers legumes of India Sanjappa (1992) reported both the with bent style; fruits rugose with prominent lateral species and noted that C. iripa is found in Odisha, West beak ................................C. iripa Bengal and A & N Islands, whereas C. ramiflora is found 1b Leaves 1- or 2-jugate, upper leaflets much larger than only in the A & N Islands. In contrast, Lakshmina- lower; rachis of inflorescences 1–2 cm long, flowers rasimhan (1999) reported only C. iripa from the A & N with straight style; fruits rugose with sub-terminal Islands and noted that C. ramiflora is not found in India beak ............................C. ramiflora Ragavan et al. | Cynometra iripa and C. ramiflora in the Anadaman and Nicobar Islands 807 Figure 1. Map showing study area. Red spots indicate sites surveyed in A & N Islands, green star indicates localities of Cynometra iripa, and blue star indicates locality of C. ramiflora. South Andaman: 1. South bay; 2. Chidiyatapu; 3. Burmanallah; 4. Beadonabad; 5. Corbyn’s Cove; 6. Sippighat; 7. Manjeri; 8. Guptapara; 9. Manglutan; 10. Wandoor; 11. Ograbraj; 12. Bambooflat Creek; 13. Wright Myo creek; 14.
Recommended publications
  • Cynometra Ramiflora Click on Images to Enlarge
    Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Cynometra ramiflora Click on images to enlarge Family Fabaceae Scientific Name Cynometra ramiflora L. Linnaeus, C. von (1753) Species Plantarum 2: 382. Type: Habitat in India. Common name Flower. CC-BY: W. Cooper. Cynometra; Wrinkle Pod Mangrove Stem Grows into a tree to 15 m, dbh to 60 cm dbh, buttressed, blaze red. Leaves New leaves pink. Leaves compound with one pair of leaflets, rarely two pairs. Basal leaflet blades if present about 1.7-8.2 x 0.9-4.6 cm, terminal leaflet blades 6.3-21 x 3-9.8 cm; unequal sided, leaflet stalks 2-6 mm Flowers. Copyright G. Sankowsky long, mostly enclosed by leaflet base. Stipules small and inconspicuous or absent. Lateral veins forming loops well inside the blade margin, 8-12 pairs. Flowers Inflorescence axis to 20 mm long, up to 20-flowered. Pedicels about 6.5-12.5 mm long. Sepals 4, about 5 mm long, apex entire or few-toothed, white. Petals 5, about 5.5-6 mm long, white. Stamens 10. Ovary hairy. Ovules 1-3 per ovary. Fruit Flowers. Copyright G. Sankowsky Fruit on a 3-10 mm long pedicel, an asymmetrical, somewhat globose nut, but flattened on the ventral side, 38-52 x 37-42 x 28.5-40 mm, rust brown coloured, woody, rugose, beak short near apex of dorsal side, seed solitary.
    [Show full text]
  • American Memorial Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/AMME/NRR—2019/1976 ON THIS PAGE A traditional sailing vessel docks in American Memorial Park’s Smiling Cove Marina Photograph by Maria Kottermair 2016 ON THE COVER American Memorial Park Shoreline and the Saipan Lagoon, looking north to Mañagaha Island. Photograph by Robbie Greene 2013 Natural Resource Condition Assessment American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/AMME/NRR—2019/1976 Robbie Greene1, Rebecca Skeele Jordan1, Janelle Chojnacki1, Terry J. Donaldson2 1 Pacific Coastal Research and Planning Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands 96950 USA 2 University of Guam Marine Laboratory UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam 96923 USA August 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Surveys
    2003 TECHNICAL REPORT #9 Wildlife and Vegetation Surveys AGUIGUAN 2002 by Jake Esselstyn, Justine B. Cruz, Laura L. Williams, and Nathaniel Hawley CNMI Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Section P.O. Box 10007, Lower Base Saipan, MP 96950 SURVEYED 14 - 21 MARCH 2002 Aguiguan 2002 WILDLIFE AND VEGETATION SURVEYS AGUIGUAN 2002 14 – 21 MARCH 2002 by Jake Esselstyn, Justine B. Cruz, Laura L. Williams, and Nathaniel Hawley Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Section P.O. Box 10007, Lower Base Saipan, MP 96950 Executive Summary The CNMI-Division of Fish and Wildlife in conjunction with the Tinian Department of Lands and Natural Resources conducted forest bird, swiftlet, vegetation, reptile, rodent, and bat surveys on Aguiguan from 14 - 21 March in 2002. The purpose of the surveys was to assess the status of the island’s wildlife populations, especially the number of goats, in preparation for improving management of the island’s resources and opening the island to goat hunting once again. Forest birds were surveyed using Variable Circular Plot (VCP) methodology on 15-20 March, 2002. Listening stations were located 150 m distant from each other along each transect and vegetation was described using the point center-quarter method for each station. The most common forest birds were Bridled white-eyes, Rufous fantails, Golden white-eyes, and Micronesian honeyeaters. Mariana fruit-doves, Micronesian starlings, White terns, and Collared kingfishers were plentiful. White-throated ground- doves, and the endangered Micronesian megapode were uncommon to rare. Forest bird populations appear to have remained stable or increased on Aguiguan over the last 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mangrove Guidebook for Southeast Asia
    RAP PUBLICATION 2006/07 MANGROVE GUIDEBOOK FOR SOUTHEAST ASIA The designations and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its frontiers or boundaries. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors alone and do not imply any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO. Authored by: Wim Giesen, Stephan Wulffraat, Max Zieren and Liesbeth Scholten ISBN: 974-7946-85-8 FAO and Wetlands International, 2006 Printed by: Dharmasarn Co., Ltd. First print: July 2007 For copies write to: Forest Resources Officer FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Maliwan Mansion Phra Atit Road, Bangkok 10200 Thailand E-mail: [email protected] ii FOREWORDS Large extents of the coastlines of Southeast Asian countries were once covered by thick mangrove forests. In the past few decades, however, these mangrove forests have been largely degraded and destroyed during the process of development. The negative environmental and socio-economic impacts on mangrove ecosystems have led many government and non- government agencies, together with civil societies, to launch mangrove conservation and rehabilitation programmes, especially during the 1990s. In the course of such activities, programme staff have faced continual difficulties in identifying plant species growing in the field. Despite a wide availability of mangrove guidebooks in Southeast Asia, none of these sufficiently cover species that, though often associated with mangroves, are not confined to this habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Cycad Species Affect the Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus
    horticulturae Brief Report Two Cycad Species Affect the Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Content of Soils Thomas E. Marler 1,* and Michael Calonje 2 1 Western Pacific Tropical Research Center, University of Guam, UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam 96923, USA 2 Montgomery Botanical Center, 11901 Old Cutler Road, Coral Gables, FL 33156, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 February 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 10 April 2020 Abstract: The influences of Cycas micronesica and Zamia integrifolia plants on soil chemistry were determined in Tinian and Florida in order to more fully understand how cycad plants affect the environments in which they grow. The introduction of C. micronesica plants into a karst habitat generated decreases in soil phosphorus after five years and increases in soil nitrogen after six years. The carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus stoichiometry beneath the cycad plants significantly diverged from those of the adjacent native forests with Pisonia grandis, Psychotria mariana, Aglaia mariannensis, Cynometra ramiflora, and Ficus sp. cover after five years. Mineralization traits were determined beneath nine-year-old C. micronesica plants and revealed the plants greatly increased net nitrification and decreased net ammonification when compared to the native forest soils with Bursera simaruba, Pinus elliottii, and Quercus virginiana cover. These flux changes increased the total available nitrogen and percent available nitrogen in the soils beneath the cycad plants. The substrates of two soil series exhibited increased carbon and nitrogen concentrations beneath Z. integrifolia plants when compared with soils away from the cycad plants. No other mineral or metal was influenced by proximity to the Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Diversity in the Hyper-Diverse Mangrove Communities in Papua New Guinea Lawong Balun [email protected]
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 12-2011 Functional Diversity in the Hyper-diverse Mangrove Communities in Papua New Guinea Lawong Balun [email protected] Recommended Citation Balun, Lawong, "Functional Diversity in the Hyper-diverse Mangrove Communities in Papua New Guinea. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2011. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1166 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Lawong Balun entitled "Functional Diversity in the Hyper-diverse Mangrove Communities in Papua New Guinea." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Taylor Feild, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Edward Shilling, Joe Williams, Stan Wulschleger Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) Functional Diversity in Hyper-diverse Mangrove Communities
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Mangrove Species Reported As Rare in Andaman and Nicobar Islands with Their Taxonomical Notes
    BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 15, Number 1, April 2014 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 12-23 Distribution of mangrove species reported as rare in Andaman and Nicobar islands with their taxonomical notes PANDISAMY RAGAVAN1,♥, K. RAVICHANDRAN2, R.S.C. JAYARAJ1, P.M. MOHAN3, ALOK SAXENA4, S. SARAVANAN1, A. VIJAYARAGHAVAN1 1Institute of Forest Genetics and Tree Breeding, R.S.Puram, P.B. No 1061, Coimbatore 641002, Tamil Nadu, India. Tel. +91-422-2484100, Fax. +91-422-2430549, email: [email protected] 2Department of Environment and Forest, Andaman and Nicobar Administration, Port Blair, A & N Islands, India 3Department of Ocean studies and marine Biology, Pondicherry University, Brookshabad Campus, Port Blair, A & N Islands, India 4Indira Gandhi Forest Training Academy, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India Manuscript received: 7 February 2014. Revision accepted: 20 March 2014. ABSTRACT Ragavan P, Ravichandran K, Jayaraj RSC, Mohan PM, Saxena A, Saravanan S, Vijayaraghavan A. 2014. Distribution of mangrove species reported as rare in Andaman and Nicobar islands with their taxonomical notes. Biodiversitas 15: 12-23. During the recent field survey it was found that among 15 rare mangroves in Andaman and Nicobar Islands, ten rare species i.e. Acanthus ebracteatus, Acrostichum speciosum, Bruguiera cylindrica, Cynometra iripa, Cynometra ramiflora, Lumnitzera racemosa, Rhizophora hybrids, Sonneratia alba, Sonneratia griffithii and Xylocarpus mekongensis are present in Andaman and Nicobar islands. In addition to Acanthus volubilis, Brownlowia tersa and Sonneratia ovata are recorded after their first report. Key words: Andaman and Nicobar islands, mangroves, rare species INTRODUCTION Acrostichum speciosum, Aegialitis rotundifolia, Bruguiera cylindrica, Bruguiera sexangula Ceriops decandra, Rarity in natural systems is common and is most often Cynometra iripa, Cynometra ramiflora, Kandelia candel, defined by two attributes: a species' distribution and its Lumnitzera racemosa, Rhizophora lamarckii, Sonneratia abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Characteristics of a Native Limestone Forest on Saipan
    Micronesica 25(1): 8S-97, 1992 Ecological Characteristics of a Native Limestone Forest on Saipan, Mariana Islands ROBERT J. CRAIG 1 Division of Fish and Wildlife, Commonwealth No. Mariana Islands, Saipan, MP 96950 Abstract-A remnant native limestone forest in the Marpi region, Sai­ pan, was studied to characterize the species composition, relative species importance, tree basal area, and tree density in that habitat. Using the point-quarter sampling technique on 400 canopy and understory trees each, I found that mean canopy and understory basal area were, re­ spectively, 45140 ± 24144 and 1460 ± 749 m 2/ha. Mean trees/ha in the canopy and understory were, respectively, 794 ± 174 and 2579 ± 770. Pisonia grandis overwhelmingly dominated in canopy basal area, whereas Cynometra ramif[ora, Pouteria obovata, and Guamia marian­ nae dominated in the understory. Cynometra ramif[ora occurred most densely in the canopy, and C. ramif[ora and G. mariannae had the highest densities in the understory. The relative measure of forest prev­ alence, the importance value, showed that P. grandis and C. ramif[ora were the principal canopy species, and C. ramif[ora and G. mariannae were the major understory species. A model of forest dynamics is pro­ posed in which P. grandis and other species largely absent from the understory may be maintained in the forest through disturbance, which might facilitate vegetative propagation, flowering, or survival of seed­ lings. Commonly fruiting, shade tolerant species like C. ramif[ora, which were frequent in both the canopy and understory, may come to pre­ dominate under conditions of low forest disturbance.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Wood Anatomy 3 and Distribution Ecology Geographical 7
    A revision of four genera of the tribe Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae-Cynometreae in Indomalesiaand the Pacific M.S. Knaap-van Meeuwen Contents Summary 1 Introduction 2 Methods used 2 Morphology and wood anatomy 3 and distribution Ecology geographical 7 Uses 8 Delimitations and interrelationships 8 Acknowledgements 10 References the to previous chapters 11 to the Key genera 12 1. Cynometra 12 Maniltoa 2. 31 3. Kingiodendron 46 4. Hardwickia 50 Index 51 Summary revision is This largely based on the gross morphology ofthe plants concerned. Four genera can be In order their delimitation also wood-anatomical distinguished. to verify a study was carried out, which I tried their supported their distinction. Furthermore, to gainknowledge about blastogeny, but this could only be recorded for three species. Two The genera have been redefined. keys to the genera are given, one based on gross morphology, another based the wood on anatomy. is Within each genus a key given to the species. The monotypic genus Schizoscyphus has been transferred to Maniltoa. In 28 all, specific names have been reduced and 34 are maintained; four new species and one new infra- specific taxonhave been described. It has appeared that the enigmatic Cynometra polyandra Roxb. must be incorporatedin Maniltoa and that Hardwickia pinnata Roxb. should be arrangedin Kingiodendron. Otherwise transfers of another no species from one genus to appeared necessary. A and is full synonymy description given of all taxa, with their geographical range and, if available, notes on their ecology. of is Hutchinson’s opinion that the occurrence hairs on stamens a taxonomically important character in could be corroborated for the treated here.
    [Show full text]
  • Download From
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) – 2009-2014 version Available for download from http://www.ramsar.org/ris/key_ris_index.htm. Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework and guidelines for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. Tran Ngoc Cuong DD MM YY Biodiversity Conservation Agency 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 Vietnam Environment Administration 8 6 3 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Designation date Site Reference Number Address: Room 201, building B, #10 Ton That Thuyet, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam Tel: +84 4 37956868 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife and Vegetation Surveys
    2000 Technical Report #2 Wildlife and Vegetation Surveys Performed BY CNMl Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Section and Tinian Department of Lands and Natural Resources Fish and Wildlife and Conservation Sections MARCH 31-APRIL 8, 2000 Please cite as: Cruz, J., L. Arriola, N. Johnson, and G. Beauprez. 2000. Weildlife and vegetation Surveys Aguiguan 2000. Technical Report #2 CNMI-DFW, m~ubl. SUMMARY OF WILDLIFE SURVEYS AGUIGUAN ISLAND MARCH 31-APRIL 8, 2000 Performed by: CNMl Division of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Section P.O. Box 10007 Lower Base, Saipan 96950 and Tinian Department of Lands and Natural Resources Fish and Wildlife and Conservation Sections Box 178 San Jose, Tinian 96952 Executive Summary Aguiguan is a unique and important island in terms of its native wildlife. It is the southern most island inhabited by the endangered Micronesian megapode (sasangat) and maintains about 10% of the archipelago-wide population of endangered Guam swiftlet (chachaguak). It is the only island other than Saipan to support Golden white- eyes (canario) in the Marianas. In the past, low numbers of the endangered Nightingale reed-warbler (gaga karisu) lived on the island as well. swiftlet (chachaguak). It is the only island other than Saipan to support Golden white- eyes (canario) in the Marianas. In the past, low numbers of the endangered Nightingale reed-warbler (gaga karisu) lived on the island as well. During the surveys of birds, lizards, mammals, and crabs conducted in April 2000 by Fish and Wildlife staff from Rota, Tinian, and Saipan, we did not detect any Nightingale reed-warblers on Aguiguan.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Mariana Islands
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GLOBAL FOREST RESOURCES ASSESSMENT COUNTRY REPORTS NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS FRA2010/154 Rome, 2010 The Forest Resources Assessment Programme Sustainably managed forests have multiple environmental and socio-economic functions important at the global, national and local scales, and play a vital part in sustainable development. Reliable and up- to-date information on the state of forest resources - not only on area and area change, but also on such variables as growing stock, wood and non-wood products, carbon, protected areas, use of forests for recreation and other services, biological diversity and forests’ contribution to national economies - is crucial to support decision-making for policies and programmes in forestry and sustainable development at all levels. FAO, at the request of its member countries, regularly monitors the world’s forests and their management and uses through the Forest Resources Assessment Programme. This country report forms part of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010 (FRA 2010). The reporting framework for FRA 2010 is based on the thematic elements of sustainable forest management acknowledged in intergovernmental forest-related fora and includes variables related to the extent, condition, uses and values of forest resources, as well as the policy, legal and institutional framework related to forests. More information on the FRA 2010 process and the results - including all the country reports - is available on the FRA Web site
    [Show full text]