DOCSLIB.ORG

American Memorial Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Memorial Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Condition Assessment American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/AMME/NRR—2019/1976 ON THIS PAGE A traditional sailing vessel docks in American Memorial Park’s Smiling Cove Marina Photograph by Maria Kottermair 2016 ON THE COVER American Memorial Park Shoreline and the Saipan Lagoon, looking north to Mañagaha Island. Photograph by Robbie Greene 2013 Natural Resource Condition Assessment American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/AMME/NRR—2019/1976 Robbie Greene1, Rebecca Skeele Jordan1, Janelle Chojnacki1, Terry J. Donaldson2 1 Pacific Coastal Research and Planning Saipan, Northern Mariana Islands 96950 USA 2 University of Guam Marine Laboratory UOG Station, Mangilao, Guam 96923 USA August 2019 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. This report received formal peer review by subject-matter experts who were not directly involved in the collection, analysis, or reporting of the data, and whose background and expertise put them on par technically and scientifically with the authors of the information. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U.S. Government. This report is available in digital format from the Natural Resource Condition Assessment Program website and the Natural Resource Publications Management website. If you have difficulty accessing information in this publication, particularly if using assistive technology, please email [email protected]. Please cite this publication as: Greene, R., R. Skeele Jordan, J. Chojnacki, and T. Donaldson. 2019. Natural resource condition assessment: American Memorial Park. Natural Resource Report NPS/AMME/NRR—2019/1976. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS 483/159851, August 2019 ii Contents Page Figures .................................................................................................................................................. vii Tables .................................................................................................................................................... xi Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................xiii Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................................. xvii List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................ xix Chapter 1. NRCA Background Information .......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Introduction and Resource Setting ....................................................................................... 5 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1. Park Purpose and Enabling Legislation ........................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3. Visitation Statistics ........................................................................................................ 13 2.1.4. Land Ownership and Regulatory Environment ............................................................. 14 2.2. Natural Resources .................................................................................................................. 18 2.2.1. Ecological Units and Upland Watershed ....................................................................... 18 2.2.2. Land Cover and Landscape Processes ........................................................................... 27 2.2.3. Park Specific Resource Descriptions ............................................................................. 40 2.2.4. Resource Issues Overview ............................................................................................. 41 2.3. Resource Stewardship ........................................................................................................... 45 2.3.1. Management Directives and Planning Guidance ........................................................... 45 2.3.2. Status of Supporting Science ......................................................................................... 47 Chapter 3. Study Process and Design .................................................................................................. 51 3.1. Study Process......................................................................................................................... 51 3.1.1. Indicator Framework, Focal Study Resources and Indicators ....................................... 52 3.2. Standard Resource Component Methods .............................................................................. 54 3.2.1. Data Mining ................................................................................................................... 55 3.2.2. Data Development and Analysis ................................................................................... 55 iii Contents (continued) Page 3.2.3. Scoring Methods and Assigning Condition ................................................................... 55 3.2.4. Preparation and Review of Resource Component Draft Assignments .......................... 58 3.2.5. Development and Review of Final Resource Component Assessments ....................... 58 3.2.6. Format of Resource Component Assessment Documents ............................................. 59 Chapter 4. Natural Resource Conditions .............................................................................................. 61 4.1. Mangroves and Wetlands ...................................................................................................... 61 4.1.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 61 4.1.2. Measures ........................................................................................................................ 63 4.1.3. Reference Conditions/Values ........................................................................................ 63 4.1.4. Data and Methods .......................................................................................................... 64 4.1.5. Condition and Trend ...................................................................................................... 66 4.1.6. Condition Summary ....................................................................................................... 68 4.2. Coastal Scrub and Secondary Forest ..................................................................................... 70 4.2.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 70 4.2.2. Measures ........................................................................................................................ 72 4.2.3. Reference Conditions/Values ........................................................................................ 72 4.2.4. Data and Methods .......................................................................................................... 73 4.2.5. Condition and Trend ...................................................................................................... 73 4.2.6. Condition Summary ....................................................................................................... 75 4.3. Shore and Near-shore Habitat ............................................................................................... 77 4.3.1. Description .................................................................................................................... 77 4.3.2. Measures .......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Special Study North Field Historic District
    Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 1 of 26 SPECIAL STUDY NORTH FIELD HISTORIC DISTRICT Tinian Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands September 2001 United States Department of the Interior - National Park Service http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 2 of 26 http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 3 of 26 North Field as it looked during World War II. The photo shows only three runways, which dates it sometime earlier than May 1945 when construction of Runway Four was completed. North Field was designed for an entire wing of B-29 Superfortresses, the 313th Bombardment Wing, with hardstands to park 265 B-29s. Each of the parallel runways stretched more than a mile and a half in length. Around and between the runways were nearly eleven miles of taxiways. Table of Contents SUMMARY BACKGROUND DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA Location, Size and Ownership Regional Context RESOURCE SIGNIFICANCE Current Status of the Study Area Cultural Resources Natural Resources Evaluation of Significance EVALUATION OF SUITABILITY AND FEASIBILITY Rarity of This Type of Resource (Suitability) Feasibility for Protection Position of CNMI and Local Government Officials http://www.nps.gov/pwro/piso/Tinian/tiniandr.htm 4/9/2008 Tinian National Historical ParkStudy Page 4 of 26 Plans and Objectives of the Lease Holder FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Findings and Conclusions Recommendations APPENDIX Selected References CINCPACFLT Letter of July 26, 2000 COMNAVMAR Letter of August 28, 2001 Brochure: Self-Guided Tour of North Field Tinian Interpret Marianas Campaign from American Memorial Park, on Tinian, and with NPS Publications MAPS Figure 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pemanfaatan Tumbuhan Suku Poaeceae Di Taman Hutan Raya R Soerjo Sebagai Media Penunjang Identifikasi
    Desy Yanuarita Wulandari, Murni Saptasari, Susriyati Mahanal. Pemanfaatan Tumbuhan Suku Poaeceae di Taman Hutan Raya R Soerjo sebagai Media Penunjang Identifikasi PEMANFAATAN TUMBUHAN SUKU POAECEAE DI TAMAN HUTAN RAYA R SOERJO SEBAGAI MEDIA PENUNJANG IDENTIFIKASI Desy Yanuarita Wulandari, Murni Saptasari 2, Susriyati Mahanal 3 1Mahasiswa Biologi Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang, Jalan Semarang No 5 Malang, 2,3 Dosen Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang, Jalan Semarang No 5 Malang, Email korespondensi : [email protected] Abstrak: Perubahan tuntutan kurikulum membuat bahan kajian yang ada perlu dilengkapi dan diperbarui sehingga capaian pembelajaran yang telah dirancang dapat tercapai maksimal. Matakuliah Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan memiliki capaian pembelajaran yaitu mahasiswa dapat menguasai prinsip taksonomi, tata nama, klasifikasi tumbuhan berdasarkan ciri-cirinya serta menyusun sistem identifikasi tumbuhan berdasarkan penelitian di lapangan. Analisis kebutuhan yang dengan penyebaran angket kepada 53 mahasiswa Biologi Universitas Negeri Malang yang telah menempuh matakuliah Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan ditemukan kesulitan belajar yang mereka alami yaitu sulit mencari referensi atau bahan dalam melakukan identifikasi tumbuhan, gambar yang terdapat dihandout kurang jelas, dan kesulitan dalam melakukan identifikasi. Solusi untuk mengatasi kesulitan belajar yang mereka alami yaitu memberikan media lain seperti buku ataupun bacaan tambahan yang dapat menuntun mahasiswa dalam proses identifikasi. Tujuan penelitian adalah melakukan identifikasi
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for the Island of Saipan, CNMI
    Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment For the Island of Saipan, CNMI January 2014 Saipan Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment | i About This Document The Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for the island of Saipan is the product of a year-long collaboration between the CNMI Division of Coastal Resources Management and the participating agencies and organizations of the CNMI Climate Change Working Group. Ongoing support for the Vulnerability Assessment and Climate Change Working Group was provided by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and contributions to the assessment stem from a wide range of federal and CNMI government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and community groups. Additional technical resources, tools, and expertise were leveraged from organizations throughout the Insular Pacific and beyond. The cumulative result of this diverse input is a project that meshes a community-based assessment and local knowledge with technical analysis and inquiry. This document presents the Vulnerability Assessment by highlighting its findings, as well as the process and information used to arrive at conclusions and recommendations. It is as much a framework for a mixed-methods assessment process as it is community narrative and practical study. Document Usage and Limitations This document is intended as an initial screening tool for prioritization of climate adaptation work on the island of Saipan. Usage of the Vulnerability Assessment should be limited to broad planning and policy purposes. Analysis of specific resources and geographic areas was conducted under potential future scenarios, which introduces inherent uncertainties and complicates field verification. As such, the findings, recommendations, and data within this document are not appropriate for application to site-specific engineering or other projects involving alterations to the physical landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaster Immunity” – a New Concept for Adaptation to Disaster Hazard Intensification
    Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, JSCE, Vol.56, 2012, February “DISASTER IMMUNITY” – A NEW CONCEPT FOR ADAPTATION TO DISASTER HAZARD INTENSIFICATION Toshimitsu KOMATSU1 and Hideo OSHIKAWA2 1Fellow Member of JSCE, Dr. of Eng., Professor, Dept. of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Kyushu University (744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan) 2 Member of JSCE, Dr. of Eng., Assistant Professor, Dept. of Urban and Environmental Engineering, Kyushu University (744 Motooka, Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan) We introduce a new “disaster immunity” concept in place of conventional “disaster management capacity” that reflects dynamic transitions in society and nature more accurately than the fixed conventional “disaster management capacity” concept. Because awareness deeply impacts on disaster management, the new concept captures disaster dynamics and could play an important role in disaster reduction. Since global warming involves disaster hazard intensification, it is not enough to simply strengthen existing measures. As an example, Japan responds to particular temperate zone patterns through long-term disaster management infrastructures. Society and nature in Japan have disaster management capacity matching typical temperate zone hazards. A rapid transition to subtropical climate patterns within the next several decades to a century is expected to generate large gaps between disaster hazards and disaster management capacity of human society and nature, leading to an imbalance. Under unstable conditions, society and nature have become increasingly vulnerable due to decreased “immunity.” Increasing “disaster immunity” is thus an urgent and important issue. Key Words : Disaster immunity, global warming, imbalanced state, unexpected disaster, dry dam 1. INTRODUCTION management capacity” that reflects dynamic transitions in society and nature more accurately Recent years have seen an increase in disaster than the fixed conventional “disaster management hazards such as intensified torrential rains, droughts capacity” concept.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Associations and Descriptions for American Memorial Park, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Saipan
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Inventory Project American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/PACN/NRR—2013/744 ON THE COVER Coastal shoreline at American Memorial Park Photograph by: David Benitez Vegetation Inventory Project American Memorial Park Natural Resource Report NPS/PACN/NRR—2013/744 Dan Cogan1, Gwen Kittel2, Meagan Selvig3, Alison Ainsworth4, David Benitez5 1Cogan Technology, Inc. 21 Valley Road Galena, IL 61036 2NatureServe 2108 55th Street, Suite 220 Boulder, CO 80301 3Hawaii-Pacific Islands Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit (HPI-CESU) University of Hawaii at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 4National Park Service Pacific Island Network – Inventory and Monitoring PO Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 5National Park Service Hawaii Volcanoes National Park – Resources Management PO Box 52 Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 December 2013 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents' Management Of, and Attitudes Towards, the Dog Population on Two Mariana Islands
    Residents’ management of, and attitudes towards, the dog population on two Mariana Islands This study reports the level of care dogs received from their caretakers and the caretaker and non-caretaker attitudes towards dogs on the islands of Guam and Saipan in order to identify hurdles in dog care and management options for the stray population. Surveys were collected from residents of Guam and Saipan “(274 and 275 respectively)” and analyzed using chi-squared tests. Dogs were the most popular companion animal (Guam 66.4%; Saipan 72% ownership) with a strong preference toward pedigree, male puppies (Guam 45.4%; Saipan 62.4%). The more preferred dogs were housed inside and fed dog food, while the less preferred local mixed-breed dogs were free-roaming and fed table scraps. The majority of caretakers in Saipan and the minority in Guam (59% and 22.8% respectively) had never provided veterinary care to their dog. Generally, caretakers on both islands did not sterilize their dogs, which may result in the potential for unplanned litters and a growth in the dog population. Residents of both islands reported witnessing abusive acts toward dogs, despite dogs being reported as having an important role on the island. This paper considers obstacles regarding veterinary cost, free-roaming populations, and low sterilization rates. Keywords: attitudes, dog, free-roaming, management, Mariana Islands, welfare 1 Introduction The Mariana Islands are separated into two entities, Guam (a single island) and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (NMI), which consists of fourteen islands (Central Intelligence Agency, 2015b). The islands’ initial fauna was characterized predominately by various species of birds, fruit bats, and land crabs (Wickler, 2004), all of which began to diminish with the increasing rate of human colonization (Fritts & Rodda, 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands Coastal Resilience Assessment
    COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COASTAL RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT 20202020 Greg Dobson, Ian Johnson, Kim Rhodes UNC Asheville’s NEMAC Kristen Byler National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Bridget Lussier Lynker, on contract to NOAA Office for Coastal Management IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER: This report represents a Regional Coastal Resilience Assessment that can be used to identify places on the landscape for resilience-building efforts and conservation actions through understanding coastal flood threats, the exposure of populations and infrastructure have to those threats, and the presence of suitable fish and wildlife habitat. As with all remotely sensed or publicly available data, all features should be verified with a site visit, as the locations of suitable landscapes or areas containing flood threats and community assets are approximate. The data, maps, and analysis provided should be used only as a screening-level resource to support management decisions. This report should be used strictly as a planning reference tool and not for permitting or other legal purposes. The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government, or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation’s partners. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government or the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation or its funding sources. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION DISCLAIMER: The scientific results and conclusions, as well as any views or opinions expressed herein, are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of NOAA or the Department of Commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant Species Not Listed Are Considered UPL for Wetland Delineation Purposes
    GREAT PLAINS REGION - NWPL 2016 FINAL RATINGS User Notes: 1) Plant species not listed are considered UPL for wetland delineation purposes. 2) A few UPL species are listed because they are rated FACU or wetter in at least one Corps region.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Boundaries, Biogeography, and Intra-Archipelago Genetic Variation Within the Emoia Samoensis Species Group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008)
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2008 Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra- archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania Alison Madeline Hamilton Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Recommended Citation Hamilton, Alison Madeline, "Species boundaries, biogeography, and intra-archipelago genetic variation within the Emoia samoensis species group in the Vanuatu Archipelago and Oceania" (2008). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3940. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3940 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. SPECIES BOUNDARIES, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND INTRA-ARCHIPELAGO GENETIC VARIATION WITHIN THE EMOIA SAMOENSIS SPECIES GROUP IN THE VANUATU ARCHIPELAGO AND OCEANIA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Biological Sciences by Alison M. Hamilton B.A., Simon’s Rock College of Bard, 1993 M.S., University of Florida, 2000 December 2008 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank my graduate advisor, Dr. Christopher C. Austin, for sharing his enthusiasm for reptile diversity in Oceania with me, and for encouraging me to pursue research in Vanuatu. His knowledge of the logistics of conducting research in the Pacific has been invaluable to me during this process.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW the Extratropical Transition of Tropical Cyclones. Part I
    VOLUME 145 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW NOVEMBER 2017 REVIEW The Extratropical Transition of Tropical Cyclones. Part I: Cyclone Evolution and Direct Impacts a b c d CLARK EVANS, KIMBERLY M. WOOD, SIM D. ABERSON, HEATHER M. ARCHAMBAULT, e f f g SHAWN M. MILRAD, LANCE F. BOSART, KRISTEN L. CORBOSIERO, CHRISTOPHER A. DAVIS, h i j k JOÃO R. DIAS PINTO, JAMES DOYLE, CHRIS FOGARTY, THOMAS J. GALARNEAU JR., l m n o p CHRISTIAN M. GRAMS, KYLE S. GRIFFIN, JOHN GYAKUM, ROBERT E. HART, NAOKO KITABATAKE, q r s t HILKE S. LENTINK, RON MCTAGGART-COWAN, WILLIAM PERRIE, JULIAN F. D. QUINTING, i u v s w CAROLYN A. REYNOLDS, MICHAEL RIEMER, ELIZABETH A. RITCHIE, YUJUAN SUN, AND FUQING ZHANG a University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin b Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi c NOAA/Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological Laboratory/Hurricane Research Division, Miami, Florida d NOAA/Climate Program Office, Silver Spring, Maryland e Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, Florida f University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York g National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado h University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil i Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, California j Canadian Hurricane Center, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada k The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona l Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland m RiskPulse, Madison, Wisconsin n McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada o Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida p
    [Show full text]
  • Cynometra Ramiflora Click on Images to Enlarge
    Species information Abo ut Reso urces Hom e A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Cynometra ramiflora Click on images to enlarge Family Fabaceae Scientific Name Cynometra ramiflora L. Linnaeus, C. von (1753) Species Plantarum 2: 382. Type: Habitat in India. Common name Flower. CC-BY: W. Cooper. Cynometra; Wrinkle Pod Mangrove Stem Grows into a tree to 15 m, dbh to 60 cm dbh, buttressed, blaze red. Leaves New leaves pink. Leaves compound with one pair of leaflets, rarely two pairs. Basal leaflet blades if present about 1.7-8.2 x 0.9-4.6 cm, terminal leaflet blades 6.3-21 x 3-9.8 cm; unequal sided, leaflet stalks 2-6 mm Flowers. Copyright G. Sankowsky long, mostly enclosed by leaflet base. Stipules small and inconspicuous or absent. Lateral veins forming loops well inside the blade margin, 8-12 pairs. Flowers Inflorescence axis to 20 mm long, up to 20-flowered. Pedicels about 6.5-12.5 mm long. Sepals 4, about 5 mm long, apex entire or few-toothed, white. Petals 5, about 5.5-6 mm long, white. Stamens 10. Ovary hairy. Ovules 1-3 per ovary. Fruit Flowers. Copyright G. Sankowsky Fruit on a 3-10 mm long pedicel, an asymmetrical, somewhat globose nut, but flattened on the ventral side, 38-52 x 37-42 x 28.5-40 mm, rust brown coloured, woody, rugose, beak short near apex of dorsal side, seed solitary.
    [Show full text]