Thematic Guide to SSRC Bibliography on Area Studies, October 2008

Antecedents to and Establishment of Area Studies in the US

Arum, Stephen Marshall. 1975. Early Stages of Foreign Language and Area Studies in the U.S., 1915-1941 , New York. Bennett, Wendell C. 1951. Area Studies in American Universities. New York: SSRC. Biddle, Sheila. 2002. Internationalization: Rhetoric or Reality? ACLS Occasional Paper No. 56. Dougherty, James Vachel 1993. A History of Federal Policy Concerning College or University- based Foreign Language and Area Studies Centers, 1941-1980 University of Maryland, College Park. Hall, Robert B. 1947. Area Studies with Special Reference to Their Implications for Research in the Social Sciences. New York: SSRC. Wagley, Charles. 1948. Area Research and Training: A Conference on the Study of World Areas. New York: Social Science Research Council. Worcester, Kenton W. 2001. Social Science Research Council, 1923-1998. New York: SSRC.

Surveys, Assessments and Reference Materials

Atkinson, Dorothy. 1991. Prospects for Faculty in Area Studies: Soviet and East European Studies. Stanford, CA: National Council of Area Studies Associations. Bay, Edna. 1991. Prospects for Faculty in African Studies. Stanford, CA: National Council of Area Studies Associations. Betteridge, Anne H. 1996 Prospects for Faculty in Studies, A Report Prepared for the National Council of Area Studies Associations by the Middle East Studies Association: NCAAS. Gosling, L. A. Peter. 1991. Prospects for Faculty in Area Studies: Asian Studies. Stanford, CA: NCASA. International Council for Educational Development. 1972. Area Studies on U.S. and Canadian Campuses: A Directory. New York: ICED. Lambert, Richard D. 1973. Language and Area Studies Review. Philadelphia, PA: American Academy of Political and Social Science. ———. 1984. Beyond Growth: The Next Stage in Language and Area Studies. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities. Lesch, Ann Mosely. 1997. Area Studies in Universities: Organization and Funding. In Japan- USA Area Studies Conference, edited by M. Masatake and J. Campbell. Osaka, Japan: National Institute for Ethnology. McCaughey, Robert A. 1979. The Permanent Revolution: An Assessment of International Studies in American Universities. New York: Report to the Ford Foundation. Ruther, Nancy L. 2002. Barely There, Powerfully Present: Thirty Years of US Policy on International Higher Education. New York: Routledge. University of California, Berkeley - Institute of International Studies. 1970. Comparative International and Area Studies: A Bibliography of Recent Research. Berkeley, CA: University of California IIS, IPUR.

1 Wiley, David. 2001. Forty Years of the Title VI and Fulbright-Hays International Education Programs: Building the Nation's International Expertise for a Global Future. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Title VI Legislation

ACE. 2008. Analysis of Higher Education Act Reauthorization. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Scarfo, Richard D. 1998. The History of Title VI and Fulbright-Hays. Edited by J. N. Hawkins, C. M. Haro, M. A. Kazanjian, G. W. Merkx and D. Wiley, International Education in the New Global Era, Proceedings of a National Policy Conference on the Higher Education Act, Title VI, and Fulbright-Hays Programs. Los Angeles, CA: International Studies and Overseas Programs. U.S. Department of Education, International Education Programs Service - Home Page 2008 [Available from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ope/iegps/index.html.

Title VI 2003-2008 Debate

Burd, Stephen. 2003. House Approves Bill on International Studies That Worries Some Academics. Chronicle of Higher Education (October 23). ———. 2003. U.S. House Panel Approves Bills on International and Graduate Education. Chronicle of Higher Education (September 26). ———. 2003. U.S. House Panel Endorses Federal Monitoring of International-Studies Programs. Chronicle of Higher Education (September 26). COSSA. 2003. Bias Charged at House Hearing on Title VI International Programs. COSSA Washington Update 22 (12 [June 23, 2003]):1-3. ———. 2004. International Education and Foreign Language Studies. COSSA Washington Update 23 (21/22 [December 13, 2004]):5. ———. 2005. No Advisory Board for Title VI, But Oversight Provisions. COSSA Washington Update 24 (16 [September 12, 2005]):3. ———. 2006. Former COSSA President to Lead NAS Panel on International Education Programs. COSSA Washington Update 25 (2 [January 30, 2006]):4-5. Crawford, Elizabeth. 2003. Area-Studies Programs Come Under Fire at House Hearing. Chronicle of Higher Education (June 20, 2003). Gitlan, Todd. 2004. Culture War, Round 3077. The American Prospect 51 (1). King-Irani, Laurie. 2004. Proposed Changes to Title VI Funding for Area Studies. Anthropology News 45 (1 [January]). Kramer, Martin. 2004. HR 3077: The Dean's Deception. Sandstorm: A weblog of asides, commentary, and analysis from Martin Kramer (January 21, 2004). Kurtz, Stanley. 2003. Hearing Both Sides of Title VI: Middle East Studies Critics and Defenders Clash on the Hill. National Review Online (June 23, 2003). Prashad, Vijay. 2003. Confronting Evangelical Imperialists. Mr. Kurtz: the Horror, the Horror. Counterpunch (November 13, 2003).

2 Strindberg, Anders. 2004. The New Commissars. The American Conservative (February 2, 2004):20-22. Task Force on Middle East Anthropology 2003. Action Alert: HR 3077 Talking Points 2003 [Available from http://ga.berkeley.edu/academics/hr3077.html. U.S. House of Representatives. 2003. International Studies in Higher Education Act of 2003. 108, H.R. 3077. U.S. House of Representatives. 2005. To Amend and Extend Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 109, H.R. 509.

Language Training within Area Studies

Brecht, Richard D., and William P. Rivers, eds. 2000. Language and National Security for the 21st Century: The Role of Title VI / Fulbright-Hays in Supporting National Language Capacity. College Park, MD: The National Foreign Language Center. Brecht, Richard D., and William P. Rivers, eds. 2001. Language and National Security: The Federal Role in Building Language Capacity in the US College Park, MD: National Foreign Language Center. Jaschik, Scott. 2007. Dramatic Plan for Language Programs. insidehighered.com (January 2). ———. 2007. Language Push for ROTC Students. insidehighered.com (May 11). ———. 2007. Languages Without Language Faculty. insidehighered.com (February 21). Newhall, Amy. 2006. The Unraveling of the Devil's Bargain: The History and Politics of Language Acquisition. In Academic Freedom After September 11, edited by B. Doumani. New York: Zone Books. O'Connell, Mary Ellen, and Janet L. Norwood, eds. 2007. International Education and Foreign Languages: Keys to Securing America’s Future / Committee to Review the Title VI and Fulbright-Hays International Education Programs. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Redden, Elizabeth. 2007. More Students, More Languages. insidehighered.com (November 14, 2007). ———. 2008. Shifting Winds in Arabic Teaching. insidehighered.com (October 1, 2008). Sutherland, Benjamin. 2005. Spies Are Us: Interest in Arabic Soars. Yale Global - Online, January 19, 2005.

Academic Disciplines and Area Studies

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: Press. ———. 2002. The Disciplines and the Future. In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by S. Brint. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Anderson, Lisa. 2003. Pursuing Truth, Exercising Power: Social Science and Public Policy in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Columbia University Press. Appadurai, Arjun. 2000. Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination. Public Culture 12 (1 [Winter]):1-19.

3 Becher, Tony, and Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Discipline. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press. Bender, Thomas and Carl E. Schorske (eds.). 1998. American Academic Culture in Transformation: Fifty Years, Four Disciplines. Princeton, NJ: Press. Original edition, Daedalus, Winter 1997. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 1998. Reconstructing Liberalism? Notes toward a Conversation between Area Studies and Diasporic Studies. Public Culture 10 (3):457-481. Findlow, Sally. 2003. Comparative Education, Area Studies, and Anthropology, Part 1: The Issues. In Hawaii International Conference on Education. Honolulu, HI. Ford Foundation. 1999. Crossing Borders: Revitalizing Area Studies. New York: Ford Foundation. Forsythe, David P., and Patrice C. McMahon. 2003. Rights, Practices and "Area Studies" In Human Rights and Diversity: Area Studies Revisited, edited by D. P. Forsythe and P. C. McMahon. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Fukuyama, Francis. 2004. How Academia Failed the Nation: The Decline of Regional Studies. SAISPHERE (Winter):6-10. Graham, Loren, and Jean-Michel Kantor. 2007. “Soft” Area Studies versus “Hard” Social Science: A False Opposition. Slavic Review 66 (1 [Spring]). Guyer, Jane I. 1997. Distant Beacons and Immediate Steps: Area Studies, International Studies, and the Disciplines in 1996. Africa Today 44 (April/June 1997):149-154. ———. 2004. Anthropology in Area Studies. Annual Review of Anthropology 33:499-523. Jay, Paul. 2006. Locating Disciplinary Change: The Afterlives of Area and International Studies in the Age of Globalization. American Literary History 18 (1 [Spring]):175-189. Katzenstein, Peter J. 2001. Area and Regional Studies in the . PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (4 [December]):789-791. Kennedy, Michael D. 1997. A Manifesto (of sorts) for Area Studies. Journal of the International Institute 4 (3 [Summer]). Klein, J. 1999. Mapping Interdisciplinary Studies: The Academy in Transition. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Lambert, Richard D. 1990. Blurring the Disciplinary Boundaries: Area Studies in the United States. American Behavioral Scientist 33 (6 [July/August]):712-732. Legters, Lyman H. 1968 The Place of Religion in Foreign Area Studies. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 35 (2 [June]):159-164. Lewis, Martin W., and Kären Wigen. 1999. A Maritime Response to the Crisis in Area Studies. The Geographical Review 89 (2):161-175. Ludden, David. 2000. Area Studies in the Age of Globalization. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad (Winter):1-22. ———. 2003. Why Area Studies? In Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World : Recasting the Area Studies Debate, edited by A. Mirsepassi, A. Basu and F. Weaver. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Mintz, Sidney. 1998. The Localization of Anthropological Practice: From Area Studies to Transnationalism Critique of Anthropology 18 (2):117-133. Mirsepassi, Ali, Amrita Basu, and Frederick Weaver, eds. 2003. Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World: Recasting the Area Studies Debate. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

4 Mitchell, Timothy. 2003. Deterritorialization and the Crisis of Social Science. In Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World : Recasting the Area Studies Debate, edited by A. Mirsepassi, A. Basu and F. Weaver. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Miura, Tōru 2002. Area Studies as a Third Path Between the Humanities and Social Science: The Potentials of Comparative Study. Tokyo: Islamic Area Studies Project. Miyoshi, Masao, and Harry D. Harootunian. 2002. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Moran, Warren 1999. Geography and Area Studies. In After the Disciplines: The Emergence of Cultural Studies, edited by M. Peters. Westport, CT Greenwood Publishing Group. Morris-Suzuki, Tessa. 2000. Anti-Area Studies. Communal/Plural: Journal of Transnational & Cross-Cultural Studies 8 (1 [April]):9-23. Payne, Anthony. 1998. The New Political Economy of Area Studies. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 27 (2):253-274. Rafael, Vincente L. 1994. The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States. Social Text (Winter):91-111. ———. 1999. Regionalism, Area Studies, and the Accidents of Agency. The American Historical Review 104 (4 [October]):1208-1220. Rhoten, Diana. 2004. Interdisciplinary Research: Trend or Transition. Items & Issues 5 (1/2 [Spring-Summer]):6-11. Samuels, Richard J., and Myron Weiner, eds. 1992. The Political Culture of Foreign Area and International Studies: Essays in Honor of Lucian W. Pye. Washington, DC: Brassey's. Szanton, David L. 2001. Area and International Studies in the United States: Intellectual Trends. In International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. Smelser and P. Bates. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ———. 2003. The Origin, Nature, and Challenges of Area Studies in the United States. In Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Teymur, Necdet. 2002. Space Between Disciplines. In Cultural Studies, Interdisciplinarity, and Translation, edited by S. Herbrechter. Kenilworth, NJ: Rodopi. Vitalis, Robert. 2002. International Studies in America. Prepared for SSRC Roundtable: Rethinking International Studies in a Changing Global Context. Items & Issues 3 (3/4 [Summer/Fall]):1-2, 12-16. Volkman, Toby Alice. 2001. Crossing Borders: The Case for Area Studies. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Wang, Ban. 2002. The Cold War, Imperial Aesthetics, and Area Studies. Social Text 20 (3):45- 65. Yúdice, George. 2003. Rethinking Area and Ethnic Studies in the Context of Economic and Political Restructuring. In Rethinking Area and Ethnic Studies, edited by J. Poblete. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

5 Area Studies: Political Science Debate

Almond, Gabriel A. 1990. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Basedau, Matthias, and Patrick Köllner. 2007. Area studies, Comparative Area Studies, and the Study of Politics: Context, Substance, and Methodological Challenges. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 1 (1 [October]):105-124. Bates, Robert H. 1997. Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy. PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (2):166-169. Diamond, Larry. 2002. What Political Science Owes the World. PS: Political Science and Politics, Online, http://www.apsanet.org/imgtest/PSOnlineDiamond911.pdf. Handelman, Howard. 1997. Comparing Comparative Politics: Area studies and Social Scientific Approaches to Latin American and Middle Eastern Politics. Milwaukee, WI: Center for International Studies, University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee and Marquette University. Johnson, Chalmers. 1997. Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science. PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (2 [June]):170-174. Kling, Merle. 1964. Area Studies and Comparative Politics. American Behavioral Scientist 8 (1 [September]):7-11. Munck, Geraldo L., and Richard Synder. 2007. Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics: An Analysis of Leading Journals Comparative Political Studies 40 (1):5-31. Pye, Lucian W., ed. 1975. Political Science and Area Studies, Rivals or Partners? Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Shea, Christopher 1997. Political Scientists Clash over Value of Area Studies. Chronicle of Higher Education (January 10, 1997).

Area Studies: Poststructuralist Critique

Curamin, Rommel A. 2006. Towards a Poststructuralist Southeast Asian Studies? SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 21 (1):90-112. Gibson-Graham, J. K. 2004. Area Studies after Poststructuralism. Environment and Planning 36 (3):405–419. Jackson, Peter A. 2003. Mapping Poststructuralism’s Borders: The Case for Poststructuralist Area Studies. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 18 (1):42–88. ———. 2003. Space, Theory, and Hegemony: The Dual Crises of Asian Area Studies and Cultural Studies. SOJOURN: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 18 (1):1-41. Palat, Ravi Arvind. 1999. Fragmented Visions: Excavating the Future of Area Studies in a Post- American World. In After the Disciplines: The Emergence of Cultural Studies, edited by M. Peters. Westport, CT Greenwood Publishing Group. Teuton, Sean. 2006. A Question of Relationship: Internationalism and Assimilation in Recent American Indian Studies. American Literary History 18 (1 [Spring]):152-174. Walter, James. 1998. A Question of Discipline? The Australian Studies vs Cultural Studies Debate. Journal of Australian Studies 38 (1).

6 Area Studies Fields: African Studies

Chege, Michael. 1997. The Social Science Area Studies Controversy from the Continental African Standpoint. Africa Today 44 (2 [April/June]):133-143. Cooper, Frederick. 1999. Africa's Past and Africa's Historians. African Sociological Review 3 (2):1-29. Coquery-Vidrovitch, Catherine 1999. The Rise of Francophone African Social Science: From Colonial Knowledge to Knowledge of Africa. In Out of One, Many Africas: Reconstructing the Study and Meaning of Africa, edited by W. Martin and M. West. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Greene, Sandra E. 2003. The Multiple Worlds of African Studies. In Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World : Recasting the Area Studies Debate, edited by A. Mirsepassi, A. Basu and F. Weaver. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Guyer, Jane I. 1996. African Studies in the United States: A Perspective, Report Submitted to the Ford Foundation. Atlanta, GA: African Studies Association. Karp, Ivan. 1997. Does Theory Travel? Area Studies and Cultural Studies. Africa Today 44 (July/September):281-295. Martin, William G., and Michael O. West. 1999. The Ascent, Triumph, and Disintegration of the Africanist Enterprise, USA. In Out of One, Many Africas: Reconstructing the Study and Meaning of Africa, edited by W. G. Martin and M. O. West. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Mudimbe, V. Y. 1988. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy and the Order of Knowledge. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Robinson, Pearl T. 2003. Area Studies in Search of Africa. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection.

Area Studies Fields: European Studies

Comisso, Ellen and Brad Gutierrez. 2002. Eastern Europe or Central Europe? Exploring a Distinct Regional Identity. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Lamont, Michèle. 2008. European Studies in the United States: Current Challenges and Prospects for the Future. The Tocqueville Review 29 (1):165-174. Metzo, Katherine, and Jennifer Cash. 2006. Whither the Area in Area Studies? How Students Teach Us to Rethink the Boundaries of Eastern Europe. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe 6 (1):3-16. Ries, Nancy. 2005. Anthropology and Eurasia: Why Culture Matters in the Study of Postsocialism. AAASS NewsNet 45 (4):1-5.

7 Area Studies Fields: Asian Studies (South Asia, Southeast Asia, East Asia)

Alatas, Syed Farid. 2000. Academic Dependency in the Social Sciences: Reflections on India and Malaysia. American Studies International 38 (2):80-96. Anderson, Benedict. 1992. The Changing Ecology of the Study of Southeast Asia in the United States. In Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America, edited by C. Hirschman, C. F. Keyes and K. Hutterer. Ann Arbor, MI: Association of Asian Studies. Assayag, Jackie. 2005. South Asia, “Made in the USA”: Cultural Transfers, Universities and the Intellectual Diaspora. In Remapping Knowledge: The Making of South Asian Studies in India, Europe and America (19th–20th centuries) edited by J. Assayag and V. Bénéï. Gurgaon, India Three Essays Collective. Bénéï, Véronique. 2005. Nations, Diaspora and Area Studies: South Asia, from Great Britain to the United States. In Remapping Knowledge: The Making of South Asian Studies in India, Europe and America (19th–20th centuries) edited by J. Assayag and V. Bénéï. Gurgaon, India: Three Essays Collective. Bowen, John. 2003. The Development of Southeast Asian Studies in the United States. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Cheah, Pheng. 2000. Universal Areas: Asian Studies in a World in Motion. Traces 1 (1 [Fall]). Chun, Allen. 2001. The Politics and Poetics of Anthropological Area Studies in Postwar Taiwan. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies 2 (2 [August]):221-245. Dirks, Nicholas B. 2003. South Asian Studies: Futures Past. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Dirlik, Arif. 2003. Culture Against History? The Politics of East Asian Identity. In Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World : Recasting the Area Studies Debate, edited by A. Mirsepassi, A. Basu and F. Weaver. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Gerke, Solvay, and Hans-Dieter Evers. 2006. Globalizing Local Knowledge: Social Science Research on Southeast Asia, 1970-2000. Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 21 (1 [April]). Gordon, Andrew. 1998. Taking Japanese Studies Seriously. In The Postwar Developments of Japanese Studies in the United States, edited by H. Hardacre. Leiden: Brill. Gordan, Andrew. 2004. Rethinking Area Studies, Once More. The Journal of Japanese Studies 30 (2 [Summer]):417-429. Harootunian, Harry D., and Nakoi Sakai. 1999. Japan Studies and Cultural Studies. positions: east asia cultures critique 7 (2 [Fall]):593-647. King, Victor T. 2005. Defining Southeast Asia and the Crisis in Area Studies: Personal Reflections On a Region. Lund: Centre for East and South-East Asian Studies. Koppel, Bruce M. 1995. Refugees or Settlers? Area Studies, Development Studies, and the Future of Asian Studies. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center Kuge, Shu. 2005. Learning Places: The Afterlives of Area Studies (review). Comparative Literature Studies 42 (1):120-123. Ludden, David 2003. Maps in the Mind and the Mobility of Asia. Journal of Asian Studies 62 (4):1057-1078.

8 McVey, Ruth T. 1998. Globalization, Marginalization and the Study of Southeast Asia. In Southeast Asian Studies: Reorientations, edited by C. J. Reynolds and R. McVey. Ithaca, NY: . Natarajan, Nalini. 2007. South Asian Area Studies in Transatlantic Dialogue. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 27 (3):591-600. Reynolds, Craig J. 1998. Self-Cultivation and Self-Determination in Postcolonial Southeast Asia. In Southeast Asia: Reorientations, edited by C. J. Reynolds and R. T. McVey. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Ong, Aihwa. 1996. Anthropology, China and Modernities: The Geopolitics of Cultural Knowledge. In The Future of Anthropological Knowledge, edited by H. L. Moore. London and New York: Routledge. SSRC. 1999. Weighing the Balance: Southeast Asian Studies Ten Years After. New York: Social Science Research Council. Tansman, Alan. 2003. Japanese Studies: The Intangible Act of Translation. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Walder, Andrew G. 2002. The Transformation of Contemporary China Studies, 1977-2002. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Yan, Hairong, and Daniel F. Vukovich. 2007. Introduction: What's Left of Asia. positions: east asia cultures critique 15 (2):211-224.

Area Studies Fields: Russian/Soviet Studies,

Bonnell, Victoria E. and George Breslauer. 2003. Soviet and Post-Soviet Area Studies. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Byrnes, Robert F. 1994. Harvard, Columbia, and CIA: My Training in Russian Studies. In A History of Russian and East European Studies in the United States: Selected Essays. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Jacoby, Susan. 2003. Now That We're Comrades, We Don't Care Anymore. The Washington Post, November 9, 2003. Lapidus, Gail W. 2002. After the Soviet Union: Reflections on the Development and Demise of Soviet Studies. SSRC Workshop on Critical Histories: Rethinking the Future of International Studies in a Changing Global Context. Washington, D.C. Saxonberg, Steven. 2003. Beyond the Transitology-Area Studies Debate. Problems of Post- Communism 50 (3 [May/June]).

9 Area Studies Fields: Latin American Studies

Berger, Mark T. 1995. Under Northern Eyes: Latin American Studies and U.S. Hegemony in the Americas, 1898-1990. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Coatsworth, John H. 1989. International Collaboration in the Social Sciences: The ACLS/SSRC Joint Committee on Latin American Studies. In SSRC/CLACSO Conference: International Scholarly Relations in the Social Sciences. Montevideo, Uruguay. Drake, Paul W., and Lisa Hilbinik. 2003. Latin American Studies: Theory and Practice. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Ferred, Grant. 2003. Crying for Argentina: The Branding and Unbranding of Area Studies. Nepantla: Views from South 4 (1):121-132. Poblete, Juan, ed. 2003. Critical Latin American and Latino Studies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Sanchez, Maria E., and Antonio M. Stevens-Arroyo, eds. 1987. Toward a Renaissance of Puerto Rican Studies: Ethnic and Area Studies in University Education. Highland Lakes, N.J.: Atlantic Research and Publications. Slocum, Karla, and Deborah A. Thomas. 2003. Rethinking Global and Area Studies: Insights from the Caribbean. American Anthropologist 105 (3):553-565.

Area Studies: New Areas

Sadowski-Smith, Claudia, and Claire F. Fox. 2004. Theorizing the Hemisphere: Inter-Americas Work at the Intersection of American, Canadian, and Latin American Studies. Comparative American Studies 2 (1 [March]):5-38. Shami, Seteney, and Anthony Koliha. 2004. Emergent Regions: Producing Knowledge of Central Asia and the Caucasus. Items & Issues 5 (1/2 [Spring-Summer]):17-19.

Area Studies Fields: Middle East Studies

Betteridge, Anne H. 1995. The Internationalization of Scholarship and Scholarly Societies: Middle East Studies Association. ACLS Occasional Paper (No. 28):13-19. ———. 2003. A Case Study in Higher Education International and Foreign Area Needs: Changes in the Middle East Studies Association Membership from 1990 to 2002. In Global Challenges and U.S. Higher Education Conference. Duke University Center for International Studies: Coalition for International Education. Binder, Leonard, ed. 1976. The Study of the Middle East: Research and Scholarship in the Humanities and the Social Sciences: A Project of the Research and Training Committee of the Middle East Studies Association. New York: Wiley. Hajjar, Lisa and Steve Niva. 1997. (Re)Made in the USA: Middle East Studies in the Global Era. Middle East Report 205 (October - December):2-9. Heydemann, Steven. 1991. The Near and Middle East Research and Training Act: Background and Current Status. MESA Newsletter 13 (4):1, 4-6.

10 Khalidi, Rashid I. 2003. The Middle East as an Area in an Era of Globalization. In Localizing Knowledge in a Globalizing World : Recasting the Area Studies Debate, edited by A. Mirsepassi, A. Basu and F. Weaver. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Kolluoglu-Kirli, Biray. 2003. From Orientalism to Area Studies. CR: The New Centennial Review 3 (3 [Fall]):93-111. Lockman, Zachary. 2004. Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mitchell, Timothy. 2003. The Middle East in the Past and Future of Social Science. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Shereen, Laila. 2005. Mapping Academic Shifts and Intersections: CCAS 30th Symposium Undertakes Critical Review of the Field of Arab Studies. CCAS News (May 2005):1- 2. Tessler, Mark, Jodi Nachtway, and Anne Banda, eds. 1999. Area Studies and Social Sciences: Strategies for Understanding Middle East Politics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ———. 2001. Introduction: The Area Studies Controversy. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Teti, Andrea. 2007. Bridging the Gap: IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1):117- 145.

Middle East Studies Controversies after September 11th

Anderson, Lisa. 2004. 2003 Presidential Address: Scholarship, Policy, Debate and Conflict, Why We Study the Middle East and Why It Matters. MESA Bulletin 38 (1):2-15. Banuazizi, Ali. 2005. and the Politics of Intimidation. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 25:519-521. Bargeron, Carol L. 2003. The Middle East: Some New Realities and Old Problems. International Social Science Review (Summer-Spring). Bednar, Michael. 2003. Stop Congressional Policing of Curricula in Area Studies. Middle East Librarians Association. Beinin, Joel. 2003. Middle East Studies After September 11. MESA Bulletin 37 (1):2-18. Brand, Laurie A. 2005. 2004 Presidential Address: Scholarship in the Shadow of Empire. MESA Bulletin 39 (1):3-18. Byrne, Richard. 2008. First Meeting for New Group on Middle East and African Studies Places Islamic Extremism at Center of Its Agenda. Chronicle of Higher Education (April 28 2008). Clark, Arthur. 2003. The New Push for Middle East Studies. Saudi Aramco World 54 (1 [January/February]):2-13. Cole, Juan. 2003. Why Are Arch-Conservatives Ganging Up on the Middle East Studies Association? History News Network (20 January). Dabashi, Hamid. 2003. Forget Reds Under the Bed, There's Arabs in the Attic. The Times Higher Education Supplement (17 October).

11 Dobbs, Michael. 2004. Middle East Studies under Scrutiny in US: Watchdog Groups Allege Left-Wing Bias. The Washington Post, January 13, 2004, A01. Gause III, F. Gregory. 2002. Who Lost Middle Eastern Studies? The Orientalists Strike Back. Foreign Affairs 81 (2 [March-April]):164-168. Heydemann, Steven. 2002. Middle East Studies After 9/11: Defending the Discipline. Journal of Democracy 13 (3 [July]):102-108. Jacobson, Jennifer. 2004. The Clash Over Middle East Studies. The Chronicle of Higher Education 50 (22). Kepel, Gilles. 2004. Politics is Death to American Mideast Studies. Financial Times, December 24, 2004. Kramer, Martin. 2001. Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle East Studies in America. Washington, DC: Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Kurtz, Stanley. 2001. Exposing Esposito: How the Academy Infected Intelligence. National Review Online (December 3, 2001). Kurtz, Stanley. 2002. Anti-Americanism in the Classroom: The Scandal of Title VI. National Review Online (May 16, 2002). Kurtz, Stanley. 2003. Reforming the Campus: Congress Targets Title VI. National Review Online (October 14, 2003). Lockman, Zachary. 2004. Behind the Battles Over US Middle East Studies. Interventions: A Middle East Report Online Feature (January). ———. 2004. Contending Visions of the Middle East: The History and Politics of Orientalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ———. 2005. Critique from the Right: The Neo-Conservative Assault on Middle East Studies. CR: The New Centennial Review 5 (1 [August 2, 2005]):63-110. Mitchell, Timothy. 2003. The Middle East in the Past and Future of Social Science. In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by D. L. Szanton. Berkeley: University of California Press/University of California International and Area Studies Digital Collection. Paik, A. Naomi 2005. Education and Empire, Old and New. Work & Culture 6:1-25. Post, Robert C. 2003. Academic Freedom and the 'Intifada Curriculum'. Academe 89 (3 [May- June]):16-20. Shami, Seteney , and Marcial Godoy-Anativia. 2007. Between the Hammer and the Anvil: Middle East Studies in the Aftermath of 9/11. International Journal of Middle East Studies 39 (3 [August]):346-349. Shohat, Ella. 2002. Area Studies, Gender Studies, and the Cartographies of Knowledge. Social Text 20 (3):67-78. Young, Michael. 2001. An Ornamental Education? Political Relevance and the Funding of Middle East Studies in the U.S. Reasononline (November 27, 2001).

Academic Freedom, Professional Responsibilities, Academia & Government

Altbach, Philip G. 2001. Academic Freedom: International Realities and Challenges. Higher Education 41 (1/2):205-219. Borrego, Anne Marie. 2002. Scholars Revive Boycott of U.S. Grants to Promote Language Training. Chronicle of Higher Education, August 16.

12 Brodsky, David. 2003. HR 3077 - The Education for Empire Act. The Faculty Advocate 4 (1-2 [December]). Chomsky, Noam. 1997. The Cold War and the University. In The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years, edited by N. Chomsky. New York: The New Press. Cole, Jonathan R. 2005. Academic Freedom Under Fire. Daedalus 134 (2):1-23. Diament, Michelle. 2005. Ford Foundation Strikes Compromise With Universities on Academic Freedom. Chronicle of Higher Education (February 4, 2005). Diamond, Sigmund. 1992. Compromised Campus: The Collaboration of Universities with the Intelligence Community, 1945-1955. New York: Oxford University Press. Doumani, Beshara, ed. 2006. Academic Freedom after September 11. New York: Zone Books. Featherman, David L., and Maris A. Vinovskis. 2001. Growth and Use of Social and Behavioral Science in the Federal Government Since World War II. In Social Science and Policy- Making: A Search for Relevance in the Twentieth Century, edited by D. L. Featherman and M. A. Vinovskis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Fish, Stanley. 2004. Intellectual Diversity: The Trojan Horse of a Dark Design. Chronicle of Higher Education (February 13). Golden, Daniel. 2004. Colleges Object to New Wording in Ford Grants. Wall Street Journal, May 4, 2004. González, Roberto J., ed. 2004. Anthropologists in the Public Sphere: Speaking Out on War, Peace, and American Power. Austin: University of Texas Press. Gutmann, Amy. 2005. Academic Freedom or Government Intrusion. Chronicle of Higher Education 52 (3):B3. Harootunian, Harry D. 2005. Ghostly Comparisons: Anderson's Telescope. Diacritics 29 (4 [Winter]):135-149. Kennedy, Michael D. 2004. Ideological Diversity and Intellectual Responsibility in Area Studies and International Affairs. The Journal of the International Institute 11 (2-3). Kennedy, Michael D. 2005. Public Relations: How Should the Scholarly and Political Communities Relate to Each Other? AAASS NewsNet 45 (2 [March]):1-6. McClennen, Sophia A. 2006. The Geopolitical War on U.S. Higher Education College Literature 33 (4 [Fall]):43-75. National Research Council. 2007. Science and security in a post 9/11 world: a report based on regional discussions between the science and security communities. In Committee on a New Government-University Partnership for Science and Security, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council of the National Academies. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press. O'Neil, Robert M. For the Record: Academic Freedom and National Security [AAUP website, Issues in Higher Education section]. American Association of University Professors 2004 [cited October 15, 2008. Available from http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/issues/AF/oneilFTR.htm. Price, David H. 2004. Threatening Anthropology: McCarthysim and the FBI's Surveillance of Activist Anthropologists. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Roy, Sara. 2005. Strategizing Control of the Academy. NEA Higher Education Journal, Special Focus: Higher Education and the National Security State (Fall):147-162. Ruther, Nancy L. 2006. U.S. Government and Higher Education: Bridging the Gap in International Expertise. New Haven, CT: MacMillan Center, Yale University.

13 Saitta, Dean J. 2006. Higher Education and the Dangerous Professor: Challenges for Anthropology. Anthropology Today 22 (4):1-3. Schrecker, Ellen. 2005. The New Macarthyism in Academe. NEA Higher Education Journal, Special Focus: Higher Education and the National Security State (Fall):103-118. Simpson, Christopher, ed. 1998. Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War. New York: New Press. Singh, Benita. 2003. New Bill Threatens Intellectual Freedom in Area Studies. Yale Daily News, November 6. SSRC. Security and Threats to Intellectual Freedom. Social Science Research Council 2004 [cited October 10, 2008. Available from http://www.ssrc.org/Threats-to-Intellectual- Freedom. Stone, Geoffrey R. 2004. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. Strout, Erin. 2004. University Provosts Ask 2 Big Foundations to Rethink Antiterrorism Provisions in Grants. Chronicle of Higher Education (May 5, 2004). Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1997. The Unintended Consequence of Cold War Area Studies. In The Cold War and the University: Toward an Intellectual History of the Postwar Years, edited by N. Chomsky. New York: The New Press. Warwick, Shelly. 2005. Will the Academy Survive 9/11? Scholarship, Security, and United States Government Policy. Government Information Quarterly 22 (4):573-593. Wilson, John K. 2008. U.S.: Academic Freedom - A Disputed Territory. University World News (January 13, 2008).

Area “Experts”

Ahmed, Abdel G.M. 1982. The State of Anthropology in the Sudan. Ethnos 47 (1-2):64-81. Bencomo, Clarisa and Elliott Colla. 1993. Area Studies, Multiculturalism, and the Problems of Expert Knowledge. Bad Subjects: Political Education for Everyday Life 5 (May 1993). Rich, Andrew. 2004. Think Tanks, Public Policy, and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. U.S. Department of State, U.S. 2002. The Role of Think Tanks in U.S. Foreign Policy. U.S. Foreign Policy Agenda 7 (3 [November]). Whitaker, Brian. 2002. US Thinktanks Give Lessons in Foreign Policy. The Guardian, August 19, 2002.

Internationalization and American Higher Education

Abraham, Itty, and Ronald Kassimir. 1996. Internationalization of the Social Sciences and the Humanities. Items 51 (2/3 [June-September]):23-30. Albright, David. 2001. The Future of Area Studies. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Altbach, Philip G., and Jorge Balán, eds. 2007. World Class Worldwide: Transforming Research Universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: Press.

14 Bartel, M. 2003. Internationalization of Universities: A University Culture-based Framework. Higher Education 45 (1 [January]):43-70. Brustein, William. 2005. Message from the Chair [On International Education at the University of Pittsburgh]. Agora Online 13 (1 [May]). ———. 2001. Redefining International Scholarship; The Future of International Research. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. ———. 2007. A National Action Agenda for Internationalizing Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: NASULGC. de Wit, Hans. 2002. Internationalization of Higher Education in the United States of America and Europe: A Historical, Comparative, and Conceptual Analysis. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishers. Green, Madeleine, and Christa Olson. 2003. Internationalizing the Campus: A User's Guide. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education. Green, Madeleine, Dao T. Luu, and Beth Burris. 2008. Mapping Internationalization On US Campuses. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education. Green, Madeleine. 2007. Venturing Abroad: Delivering US Degrees Through Overseas Branch Campus. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education. Groennings, Sven , and David S. Wiley, eds. 1990. Group Portrait: Internationalizing the Disciplines. New York: The American Forum. Gumperz, Eileen McDonald. 1970. Internationalizing American Higher Education: Innovation and Structural Change. Berkeley, CA: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education. Hall, Peter A., and Sidney Tarrow. 2001. Globalization and Area Studies: When Is Too Broad Too Narrow? In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Hayward, Fred M. 2000. Preliminary Status Report 2000: Internationalization of U.S. Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education. Holzner, Burkart. 2002. Global Change and the Organizational and Intellectual Challenges for International Studies in the United States. Prepared for SSRC Roundtable: Rethinking International Studies in a Changing Global Context. Items & Issues 3 (3/4 [Summer/Fall]):5-8. Kennedy, Michael D. 2001. Globalizing Knowledge through Area Studies. Journal of the International Institute 9 (1 [Fall]). McCarthy, Joann S. 1984. International Studies and Academic Enterprise: A Chapter in the Enclosure of American Learning. New York: Columbia University Press. ———. 2007. A Roadmap for Creating the Global Campus. Chronicle of Higher Education (June 29, 2007). Mestenhauser, Josef A, and Brenda J. Ellingboe, eds. 1998. Reforming the Higher Education Curriculum: Internationalizing the Campus. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press. NAFSA. 2007. Internationalizing the Campus: Profiles of Success at Colleges & Universities: NAFSA: Association of International Educators. NASULGC. 2004. A Call to Leadership: The Presidential Role in Internationalizing the University. In A Report of the NASULGC Task Force on International Education. Washington, D.C.: NASULGC.

15 Olds, Kris. 2008. Interregionalism and the Globalization of Higher Education: New Euro-Asia Initiatives. global e-journal.org 2 (1 [May]). O'Meara, Patrick, Howard D. Mehlinger, and Roxana Ma Newman, eds. 2001. Changing Perspectives on International Education. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Petrov, Julia A. 1973. Foreign Language, Area studies, and Other Aspects of International Education: Completed Research and Instructional Materials Produced under the National Defense Education Act of 1958, Title VI, section 602; A Bibliography U.S. Office of Education, Institute of International Studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Prewitt, Kenneth. 1996. The New International Program. Items 50 (1, 2-3):15-18; 31-40. Pultar, Gönül 2002. Internationalizing American Studies: A Non-US Perspective, or A View from Turkey. Crossroads (August 9, 2002). Reynolds, Craig J. 1999. Internationalising Social Science: A New Architecture. Dialogue 18 (1):23-26. Smelser, Neil J. 2003. On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology. International Sociology 18 (4):643-657. Spaulding, Seth, James Mauch, and Lin Lin. 2001. The Internationalization of Higher Education: Policy and Program Issues. In Changing Perspectives on International Education, edited by P. O'Meara, H. D. Mehlinger and R. M. Newman. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Turner, Yvonne, and Sue Robson. 2008. Internationalizing the University. New York: Continuum. Waters, Neil L., ed. 2000. Beyond the Area Studies Wars: Toward a New International Studies, The Middlebury Bicentennial Series in International Studies. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

Knowledge Production and the University

Bulmer, Martin. 2001. Knowledge for the Public Good: The Emergence of Social Sciences and Social Reform in Late-Nineteenth- and Early-Twentieth-Century America, 1880-1940. In Social Science and Policy-Making: A Search for Relevance in the Twentieth Century, edited by D. L. Featherman and M. Vinovskis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. Calhoun, Craig. 2006. Is the University in Crisis? Society (May/June 2006). Cetina, Karin Knorr. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Press. Cohen, David Wiliam, Michael D. Kennedy, and Kathleen Canning. 2004. Sacred Spaces and Heretical Knowledge: National Universities and Global Publics,. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Library. Cooper, Frederick and Randall Packard, ed. 1997. International Development and the Social Sciences: Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press. Crane, Diana. 1971. Transnational Networks in Basic Science. International Organization 25 (3 [Summer]):585-601.

16 Cumings, Bruce. 1998. Boundary Displacement: Area Studies and International Studies During and After the Cold War. In Universities and Empire: Money and Politics in the Social Sciences During the Cold War, edited by C. Simpson. New York: New Press. Damrosch, David. 1995. We Scholars: Changing the Culture of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Frank, David John, and Jay Gabler. 2006 Reconstructing the University: Worldwide Shifts in Academia in the 20th Century. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Garvin, David A. 1980. The Economics of University Behavior. New York: Academic Press. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott, and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage. Gumport, Patricia A. 2002. Universities and Knowledge: Restructuring the City of Intellect. In The Future of the City of Intellect: The Changing American University, edited by S. Brint. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Hammack, David C., Stanton Wheeler, and Russell Sage Foundation. 1995. Social Science in the Making: Essays on the Russell Sage Foundation, 1907-1972 New York: Russell Sage Foundation Publications. Haskell, Thomas L. 1998. Objectivity Is Not Neutrality: Explanatory Schemes in History. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. ———. 2000. The Emergence of Professional Social Science: The American Social Science Association and the Nineteenth-Century Crisis of Authority. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Original edition, 1977. Jacoby, Russell. 2000. The Last Intellectuals: American Culture in the Age of Academe. New York: Basic Books. Original edition, 1987. Katz, Stanley. 2002. The Pathbreaking, Fractionalized, Uncertain World of Knowledge. Chronicle of Higher Education (September 20, 2002). Kuhn, Thomas. 1969. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lenoir, Timothy. 1997. Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Reuben, Julie A. 1996. The Making of the Modern University: Intellectual Transformation and the Marginalization of Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Ross, Dorothy. 1991. The Origins of American Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rothblatt, Sheldon, and Bjorn Wittrock, eds. 1993. The European and American University Since 1800: Historical and Sociological Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Skinner, Quentin. 1988. Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas. In Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics, edited by J. Tully. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

17