How Railways Can Be Part of Canada's Climate Change Solution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How Railways Can Be Part of Canada's Climate Change Solution How railways can be part of Canada’s climate change solution A submission provided by the Railway Association of Canada 1 /07/2016 (originally submitted on May 31) Version 2 – update Version 2 – update Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Table of Contents 1 Canada’s railway sector .......................................................................................... 4 Climate change policy in the transportation sector ................................................................... 5 2 How railways can be part of Canada’s climate change solution ......................... 6 3 Policy considerations for the future ...................................................................... 9 4 Railway emissions management programs and performance .......................... 10 5 Our recommendations .......................................................................................... 12 Modal shift is a mitigation opportunity for Canada .................................................................. 12 Revenues collected from carbon pricing strategies should be reinvested into rail ................... 12 The Government needs to support clean technology and innovation in the rail sector ............ 13 6 Concluding remarks .............................................................................................. 13 Appendix A: List of RAC Members 2 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Acronym Table AMT Agence métropolitaine de transport CO2e CO2 equivalent COP Conference of Parties CDP Carbon Disclosure Project GHG Greenhouse Gases MOU Memorandum of Understanding Mt Megatonnes PEET Programme d’efficacité énergétique dans le domaine du transport PETMAF Programe d’aide à l’améloration de l’efficacité du transport maritime, aérien et ferroviaire en matière de réduction ou d’évitement des émissions de gaz à effet de serre PREGTI Programme visant la réduction ou l’évitement des émissions de gaz à effet de serre par le développement du transport intermodal RAC Railway Association of Canada RTK Revenue Tonne Kilometer TTCI Transportation Technology Center Inc. U.S. United States 3 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Please accept these comments on behalf of the Railway Association of Canada (RAC) and its members. RAC represents freight and passenger railway companies that move 75 million people and more than $280 billion worth of goods in Canada each year. As the voice of Canada’s railway industry, the RAC advocates on behalf of its members to ensure that the rail sector remains globally competitive, sustainable, and safe. This submission underscores that the railway industry is well placed to support Canada’s commitment to combat climate change and reduce transportation-related emissions. It recommends that: The pan-Canadian approach to addressing climate change should allocate $165 million (M) to support rail-infrastructure programs that incent modal shift and supports reoccurring emission reductions of approximately 1.2 Mt CO2e per year or 5.8 Mt over five years; A $10 M research program is created for Canada’s railway supplier and clean-tech community to enable access to the Transportation Technology Center located in Pueblo, Colorado; and Federal and provincial governments work together to develop a common framework for federally regulated railways, and develop modal shift protocols that can be linked across multiple jurisdictions. Appendix A provides a list of RAC members in support of this submission. 1 Canada’s railway sector Canadian railways provide multiple services to more than 10,000 customers each year by using finite resources, including track infrastructure, right of ways, yards, locomotives, and crews. More than 4 M carloads of freight are moved by approximately 2,700 locomotives and 33,200 dedicated railroaders across 43,000 kilometers of track that spans nine provinces, one territory and several points throughout the continental United States (U.S.). This impressive network consists largely of two Canadian owned and operated Class I railways, U.S. Class I carriers and more than 30 local and regional railways that intersect with multiple transportation service providers including ports, terminal operators, truckers and other logistics providers. As part of this complex network, Canadian freight railways strive to operate as efficiently as possible by operating 24/7 and 365 days a year. This involves maximizing long-haul movements and train lengths, and consolidating traffic flow, as well as minimizing car handlings, switching and the number of times a car must be handled in a yard. Passenger railways reflect services provided predominantly by VIA Rail, GO Transit, Agence métropolitaine de transport (AMT) and West Coast Express. Each year nearly 70 M people in the Vancouver, Greater Toronto, and Montreal areas commute to work by rail and an additional 5 million travel with VIA rail each year. 4 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Figure 1: Canada’s rail franchise Management of this network results in immediate benefits for all customers who are served by it. These benefits include access to a highly efficient and safe railway network that enables economic competitiveness, and an emission friendly mode of transportation for travelling and commuting to work for all Canadians. Climate change policy in the transportation sector While Canada’s engagement in COP 21 and commitment to the Paris Agreement underscores the federal government’s intentions to play a more instrumental role in driving down emissions nationally and internationally, several regional climate change initiatives have emerged, and in doing so, have set a price on carbon that effects transportation carriers. Whether through the taxation-based system in British Columbia, or the market-based cap and trade approach underway in Quebec and soon to be implemented in Ontario (January 2017), carbon pricing aspires to reduce emissions at the lowest possible cost to Canadians. Under all systems, a railway is subject to compliance costs as a fuel user, which typically translates into increased fuel costs for railways and their respective freight and passenger customers. The rapid development of provincial initiatives has created two shortcomings that must be addressed in the context of developing a national vision for climate change that includes a comprehensive approach to reducing emissions produced by the transportation sector – which, as reflected in Figure 2, reflects approximately 30 per cent of Canada’s GHG emissionsi. 5 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada Figure 2: Canada’s emissions profile First, the approach to managing transportation-related emissions through provincial initiatives has been fragmented and is not receptive to the operational aspects of interprovincial railways. The resulting effect is a requirement for interprovincial railways to participate in a series of regional initiatives that lack cohesion and have not been introduced in a coordinated way. Second, market-based initiatives do not address all transported-related emissions within their jurisdictions, creating an uneven playing field for freight and passenger railways. For example, marine and air carriers are exempt from Quebec and Ontario’s cap and trade systems. Furthermore, while Quebec and Ontario’s cap and trade systems allow (or in the case of Ontario, intend to allow) for carbon offsets, only sectors not covered by the cap (e.g. organic waste management, forest projects, etc.) are allowed to create carbon offsetsii. As a result, railways cannot generate offset credits for shippers who choose to transport their products by rail over other more intensive modes of transportation. The underlying effect is that modal shift becomes an implicit rather than explicit instrument for driving down transportation related emissions in Canada. Additional information about the potential for modal shift to reduce emissions is presented in the subsequent section. 2 How railways can be part of Canada’s climate change solution The movement of goods and people by rail continues to be a highly efficient and GHG friendly mode of transportation. In Canada, rail can move one tonne of freight 215 kilometers on a single litre of fueliii. Furthermore, a single freight train is capable of removing over 300 trucks from our congested road and highway networkiv,v. 6 Submission to Environment and Climate Change Canada An evaluation completed by the U.S. Federal Railroad Administration in 2009 took a deeper look at the fuel efficiency of rail and truck. The study examined 23 freight movements and took into consideration multiple distances and commodities that could be moved by truck and railvi. For each movement, fuel consumption for each mode was estimated and circuity was taken into account. This evaluation concluded that rail was more fuel efficient than truck on all 23 movements and that fuel savings from using rail are significant. With respect to fuel savings, rail fuel efficiency varies from 156 to 512 ton-miles per gallon, while truck fuel efficiency ranges from 68 to 133 ton-miles per gallonvii. The rail-truck fuel efficiency ratios ranged from 1.9 to 5.5 for all movements (with circuity taken into account) and 0.8 to 8.5 (without circuity), with 3.7 and 3.9 as the respective averagesviii . For movements involving intermodal, the rail-truck fuel efficiency ratio was 4.0. In other words, transportation by rail was found to be roughly 4 times more fuel efficient than truck. Embracing modal shift as an option
Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 — Appendices © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, As Represented by the Minister of Transport 2012
    Pathways: Connecting Canada’s Transportation System to the World Volume 2 — Appendices © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Transport 2012. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without prior written permission of the Department of Transport, Canada. Please contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre at 1 800 305-2059 (EST) for assistance. The information in this publication is to be considered solely as a guide and should not be quoted as or considered to be a legal authority. It may become obsolete in whole or in part at any time without notice. ISSN T22-216/2015E-PDF Catalogue No. 978-0-660-03926-8 TP 15316E (12/2015) TC-1005770 Publié aussi en français sous le titre : Parcours : Brancher le système de transport du Canada au reste du monde – Annexes Canada Transportation Act Review Pathways: Connecting Canada’s Transportation System to the World – Appendices Issued also in French under title : Parcours : Brancher le système de transport du Canada au reste du monde – Annexes Volume Two — Appendices 3 Appendix A: Economic Context 21 Appendix B: Governance 42 Appendix C: Linking Trade and Transportation 59 Appendix D: The North 71 Appendix E: Innovation 77 Appendix F: Climate Change 89 Appendix G: Access and Accessibility 103 Appendix H: Freight Rail 115 Appendix I: Transport of Grain 132 Appendix J: Passenger Rail 140 Appendix K: Air Transport 175 Appendix L: Marine Transport 200 Appendix M: Canadian Transportation Agency 204 Appendix N: Mandate and Terms of Reference 207 Appendix O: Submissions and Consultations 215 Appendix P: The Team 217 Appendix Q: Glossary Appendix A Economic Context 3 Historically, population and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have been shown to be strongly linked to growth rates for passenger and freight transport volumes, and these indicators are used as the basic drivers when forecasting aggregate demand for transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the 2018 – 2022 Corporate Plan and 2018 Operating and Capital Budgets
    p SUMMARY OF THE 2018 – 2022 CORPORATE PLAN AND 2018 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS SUMMARY OF THE 2018-2022 CORPORATE PLAN / 1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. 5 MANDATE ...................................................................................................................................... 14 CORPORATE MISSION, OBJECTIVES, PROFILE AND GOVERNANCE ................................................... 14 2.1 Corporate Objectives and Profile ............................................................................................ 14 2.2 Governance and Accountability .............................................................................................. 14 2.2.1 Board of Directors .......................................................................................................... 14 2.2.2 Travel Policy Guidelines and Reporting ........................................................................... 17 2.2.3 Audit Regime .................................................................................................................. 17 2.2.4 Office of the Auditor General: Special Examination Results ............................................. 17 2.2.5 Canada Transportation Act Review ................................................................................. 18 2.3 Overview of VIA Rail’s Business .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Canadian and United States Rail Economic Regulations
    www.cpcs.ca FINAL REPORT Comparison of Canadian and United States Rail Economic Regulations Prepared for: The Railway Association of Canada Prepared by: CPCS CPCS Ref: 13381 January 20, 2015 FINAL REPORT | Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Rail Economic Regulations CPCS Ref: 13381 Table of Contents Acronyms / Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 1 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................................................. 2 2 Scope of Rail Economic Regulation .............................................................................................. 2 3 National Transportation Policy Statements ................................................................................. 3 4 Market Entry and Exit ................................................................................................................... 4 5 Level of Services ........................................................................................................................... 5 6 Pricing of Services ......................................................................................................................... 5 7 Competitive Access Provisions ..................................................................................................... 7 8 Mediation and
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service
    Algoma Central Railway Passenger Rail Service ECONOMIC IMPACT ASSESSMENT August 13, 2014 To: Algoma Central Railway (ACR) Passenger Service Working Group c/o Sault Ste. Marie Economic Development Corporation 99 Foster Drive – Level Three Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5X6 From: BDO Canada LLP 747 Queen Street East Sault Ste. Marie, ON P6A 5N7 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................. I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................... 2 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................. 2 Revenue and Ridership ................................................................................ 2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................. 3 Socio-Economic Impact ................................................................................ 4 Economic Impact ........................................................................................... 4 Social Impact ............................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ................................................................................................ 6 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Rail Cars. Inc. North Central Railcars, Ltd
    GREAT LAKES RAIL CARS. INC. NORTH CENTRAL RAILCARS, LTD. 2016 EXCURSION CATALOGUE Great Lakes Central Railroad (MI) June 2-5, 2016 (Thur-Sun) North Shore Scenic Railroad (MN) & Duluth Harbor Cruise July 5, 2016 (Tues) Northern Plains Railroad (ND) July 7, 2016 (Thur) Keewatin Railway Company (MB) July 10, 2016 (Sun) Torch River Rail (SK) July 12, 2016 (Tues) Northern Lights Railway (SK) July 13, 2016 (Wed) Big Sky Rail, Ltd (SK) July 14 -15, 2016 (Thur/Fri) Great Sandhills Railway, Ltd. (SK) July 18 & 19, 2016 (Mon/Tues) Indiana Northeastern Railroad (IN/MI) August 19-21, 2016 (Fri/Sat/Sun) Huron Central Railway (ON) August 24-25, 2016 (Wed/Thur) Ontario Northland Railway (ON) August 28 - September 2, 2016 (Sun - Fri) GREAT LAKES RAIL CARS, INC. EXCURSION ANNOUNCEMENT (Great Lakes Central Railroad, Inc.) Great Lakes Central Railroad (MI) June 2-5, 2016 (Thurs-Sun) Great Lakes Rail Cars, Inc. is pleased to sponsor a 3-day motor car excursion over a portion of the Great Lakes Central Railroad (ex- Tuscola & Saginaw Bay Railway), beginning with set-on Thursday afternoon, June 2, 2016, followed by the excursion on Friday/Saturday/Sunday, June 3-5, 2016. All NARCOA members are welcome to participate. Participants will travel a total of 238 miles in the beautiful northwestern portion of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula. The trip will start in Cadillac, MI. We will run north to Petoskey, Michigan on Friday; Petoskey to Traverse City on Saturday; and Traverse City to Cadillac on Sunday. The excursion fee of $525.00 (USD) includes all railroad fees, very nice overnight hotel accommodations in both Traverse City and Petoskey, Ml; very nice continental break- fast on Saturday & Sunday morning, transportation to/from the hotel in both Traverse City & Petoskey, and other related excursion costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada Transportation Act Review
    Canada Transportation Act Review Railway Association of Canada Submission #1 February 26, 2015 February 26, 2015 The Honourable David L. Emerson P.C Canada Transportation Act Review Secretariat 350 Albert Street, Suite 330 Ottawa, ON K1A 0N5 [email protected] RE: Grain Policy in Canada The Railway Association of Canada (RAC) is pleased to provide this submission to the Canada Transportation Act Review Chair, Advisors and supporting Secretariat. This submission is intended to inform the Chair’s position about grain policy in Canada, and to underline that market forces drive the development of Canada’s modern rail system. This submission has been filed on behalf of RAC’s freight railway members (Appendix A). This submission is supported by two documents which are appended for review: Appendix B - “Winter’s Impact on Railroad Operations: Fact and Fantasy” provides an overview of the negative impacts that Canadian winter has on railroad operations in Canada; and Appendix C - “Freedom in Western Grain Movement” presents an assessment of the effect of the Maximum Grain Revenue Entitlement provision on railway efficiency, growth, and productivity in the Grain Handling and Transportation System (GHTS). The RAC will file an additional submission before the consultation period ends this year. About the Railway Association of Canada RAC represents more than 50 freight and passenger railway companies that move 75 million people and $280 billion (B) worth of goods in Canada each year. As the voice of Canada’s railway industry, RAC advocates on behalf of its members and associate members to ensure that the rail sector remains safe, globally competitive and sustainable.
    [Show full text]
  • Stronger Ties: a Shared Commitment to Railway Safety
    STRONGER TIES: A S H A R E D C O M M I T M E N T TO RAILWAY SAFETY Review of the Railway Safety Act November 2007 Published by Railway Safety Act Review Secretariat Ottawa, Canada K1A 0N5 This report is available at: www.tc.gc.ca/tcss/RSA_Review-Examen_LSF Funding for this publication was provided by Transport Canada. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department. ISBN 978-0-662-05408-5 Catalogue No. T33-16/2008 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Transport, 2007 This material may be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes provided that the source is acknowledged. Photo Credits: Chapters 1-10: Transport Canada; Appendix B: CP Images TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ...............................................................1 1.1 Rationale for the 2006 Railway Safety Act Review . .2 1.2 Scope . 2 1.3 Process ....................................................................................3 1.3.1 Stakeholder Consultations . .4 1.3.2 Research . 6 1.3.3 Development of Recommendations .......................................6 1.4 Key Challenges for the Railway Industry and the Regulator.................7 1.5 A Word of Thanks .................................................................... 10 2. STATE OF RAIL SAFETY IN CANADA ...................................11 2.1 Accidents 1989-2006 ................................................................. 12 2.2 Categories of Accidents . 13 2.2.1 Main Track Accidents...................................................... 14 2.2.2 Non-Main Track Accidents ............................................... 15 2.2.3 Crossing and Trespasser Accidents . 15 2.2.4 Transportation of Dangerous Goods Accidents and Incidents . 17 2.3 Normalizing Accidents . 18 2.4 Comparing Rail Safety in Canada and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Q1 2012-13 Quarterly Report
    First Quarter Report 2012-2013 Crop Year Monitoring the Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System ii First Quarter Report of the Monitor – Canadian Grain Handling and Transportation System Quorum Corporation Suite 701, 9707–110 Street Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2L9 Telephone: 780 / 447-2111 Fax: 780 / 451-8710 Website: www.quorumcorp.net Email: [email protected] Members of the Quorum Corporation Advisory Board Mark A. Hemmes Chairman of the Advisory Board President, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta J. Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Sherwood Park, Alberta Richard B. Boyd Senior Vice President, Canadian National Railway Company (retired) Kelowna, British Columbia A. Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis, Quorum Corporation Edmonton, Alberta Shelley J. Thompson President, SJT Solutions Southey, Saskatchewan Members of the Grain Monitoring Team Mark Hemmes President Marcel Beaulieu Director – Research and Analysis Bruce McFadden Director – Research and Analysis Vincent Roy Senior Technical Officer Additional copies of this report may be downloaded from the Quorum Corporation website. 2012-2013 Crop Year iii Foreword The following report details the performance of Canada’s Grain Handling and Transportation System (GHTS) for the three months ended 31 October 2012, and focuses on the various events, issues and trends manifest in the movement of Western Canadian grain during the first quarter of the 2012-13 crop year. As with the Monitor’s previous quarterly and annual reports, the report
    [Show full text]
  • Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board
    Labour Relations Board Saskatchewan CHARLES HAWKINS, Applicant v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION, LOCAL 1110 and CARLTON TRAIL RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondents LRB File No. 193-01; March 19, 2003 Vice-Chairperson, James Seibel; Members: Clare Gitzel and Bruce McDonald For the Applicant: Ron Parchomchuk For the Union: Michael Church For the Employer: No one appearing Duty of fair representation – Arbitrary conduct – Union investigated circumstances of grievance, considered relevant factors and weighed competing interests of applicant, union members and union – Board finds union did not act arbitrarily and dismisses application. Duty of fair representation – Scope of duty – Board reviews scope of duty relating to grievance and arbitration proceedings – Union investigated circumstances of grievance, considered relevant factors and weighed competing interests of applicant, union members and union – Board finds union did not act arbitrarily, discriminatorily or in bad faith and dismisses application. The Trade Union Act, ss. 5(d) and 25.1 REASONS FOR DECISION Background: [1] In late 1997, Carlton Trail Railway Company (“CTR”) acquired Canadian National Railway’s (“CN”) Prince Albert terminal and associated lines between Saskatoon, North Battleford and Meadow Lake. Prior to the transfer, Charles Hawkins (the “Applicant”) was employed by CN at Prince Albert as a conductor. He was a member of the United Transportation Union, Local 1110 (“UTU” or the “Union”). UTU is the bargaining agent for a unit comprising conductors, assistant conductors and brakemen employed by CN, and for another unit of such employees employed by CTR. [2] Prior to the sale, affected UTU members employed at CN were given the option to transfer to other CN operations, to transfer to CTR retaining their accumulated CN seniority, or to sever their employment from CN and receive a severance payment.
    [Show full text]