Comparison of Canadian and United States Rail Economic Regulations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Comparison of Canadian and United States Rail Economic Regulations www.cpcs.ca FINAL REPORT Comparison of Canadian and United States Rail Economic Regulations Prepared for: The Railway Association of Canada Prepared by: CPCS CPCS Ref: 13381 January 20, 2015 FINAL REPORT | Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Rail Economic Regulations CPCS Ref: 13381 Table of Contents Acronyms / Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 2 1 Purpose of the Report .................................................................................................................. 2 2 Scope of Rail Economic Regulation .............................................................................................. 2 3 National Transportation Policy Statements ................................................................................. 3 4 Market Entry and Exit ................................................................................................................... 4 5 Level of Services ........................................................................................................................... 5 6 Pricing of Services ......................................................................................................................... 5 7 Competitive Access Provisions ..................................................................................................... 7 8 Mediation and Arbitration ........................................................................................................... 8 9 Cost of Capital and Revenue Adequacy ........................................................................................ 9 10 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 9 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 14 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 14 1.2 Purpose of this Report ................................................................................................................ 14 1.3 Structure of this Report .............................................................................................................. 15 2 Canada and US National Transportation Policy Statements ...................................................... 16 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Canada Transportation Policy Statement .................................................................................. 17 2.2.1 Canada Transportation Policy Statement ........................................................................ 17 2.2.2 Transportation Policy Statement Characteristics ............................................................ 18 2.2.3 Creation and Evolution of the Transportation Policy Statement .................................... 19 2.2.4 Role of the Policy Statement in Interpreting the CTA ..................................................... 20 2.3 United States Transportation Policy Statement ......................................................................... 21 2.3.1 United States Transportation Policy Statement .............................................................. 21 2.3.2 Adoption of the Transportation Policy Statement .......................................................... 23 2.3.3 Transportation Policy Statement Characteristics ............................................................ 23 2.3.4 Role of the Policy Statement in Interpreting 49 U.S.C. .................................................... 24 2.4 Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................ 27 FINAL REPORT | Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Rail Economic Regulations CPCS Ref: 13381 3 Market Entry and Exit ............................................................................................................... 29 3.1 Canada ........................................................................................................................................ 30 3.1.1 Certificate of Fitness ........................................................................................................ 30 3.1.2 Construction of a Railway Line ......................................................................................... 32 3.1.3 Running Rights ................................................................................................................. 32 3.1.4 Discontinuance ................................................................................................................. 33 3.2 United States .............................................................................................................................. 37 3.2.1 Certificate to Construct and Operate .............................................................................. 37 3.2.2 Exemption from the Need to Obtain a Certificate ........................................................... 38 3.2.3 Environmental Analysis .................................................................................................... 40 3.2.4 Abandonment and Discontinuance ................................................................................. 40 3.3 Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................ 43 4 Level of Services ....................................................................................................................... 46 4.1 Canada ........................................................................................................................................ 47 4.1.1 Accommodation for Traffic – Section 113 ....................................................................... 48 4.1.2 Facilities for Traffic – Section 114 .................................................................................... 57 4.1.3 Adequate and Suitable Accommodation – Section 115 .................................................. 60 4.1.4 Complaint and Investigation Concerning Company’s Obligations – Section 116 ............ 61 4.1.5 Arbitration on Level of Services ....................................................................................... 67 4.2 United States .............................................................................................................................. 67 4.2.1 Common Carrier Transportation, Service and Rates – 49 U.S.C. 11101 .......................... 68 4.2.2 Facilities for Interchange of Traffic – 49 U.S.C. 10742 ..................................................... 71 4.2.3 Switch Connections and Tracks – 49 U.S.C. 11103 .......................................................... 74 4.2.4 Car Service – 49 U.S.C. 11121 and 11122 ........................................................................ 74 4.2.5 Railroad Development – 49 U.S.C. 10907 ........................................................................ 76 4.2.6 Remedies .......................................................................................................................... 77 4.2.7 Statutory Limitations on the Jurisdiction of the Board .................................................... 79 4.3 Summary and Key Findings ........................................................................................................ 82 4.3.1 LOS Obligations of Canadian Federal Railway Companies .............................................. 82 4.3.2 Canadian Rail LOS Complaint Mechanism ....................................................................... 83 4.3.3 New CTA Amendments .................................................................................................... 84 4.3.4 LOS Obligations of U.S. Federal Rail Carriers ................................................................... 85 FINAL REPORT | Comparison of Canadian and U.S. Rail Economic Regulations CPCS Ref: 13381 4.3.5 Mechanisms for Resolving Rail Service Issues in the U.S................................................. 85 4.3.6 Exempt Commodities ....................................................................................................... 85 5 Pricing of Services ..................................................................................................................... 87 5.1 Canada ........................................................................................................................................ 88 5.1.1 Where Are Rates and Charges Set Out? .......................................................................... 88 5.1.2 Rates ................................................................................................................................. 91 5.1.3 The Notion of Reasonable Rate and Final Offer Arbitration............................................ 92 5.1.4 Revenue Cap for the Movement of Western Grain ......................................................... 94 5.1.5 Charges ........................................................................................................................... 100 5.2 United States
Recommended publications
  • Transportation Timetables, 1880-2007
    MSS #015, page 1 Transportation Timetables, 1880-2007 MSS: # 016 Processed by: Jason Freitas, December 2014 Volume: 10 boxes Abstract: Timetables for railroads, bus companies, airlines, steamship, and boat transportation companies comprise this collection. The collection was accumulated over the course of about fifty years by various individuals. Though the bulk of items date from the 1940’s to the 1960’s, earlier and later periods are also well- represented. The majority of the collection consists of both employee and public timetables from railroads of New England, with other items coming from New York and Canadian railroads, a wide variety of smaller New England railroads, bus and steamship companies, and railway companies that preceded the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. Collection Creator: Beverly Historical Society, Walker Transportation Collection Provenance: This collection has been amassed through various donors since 1969. Conservation/Processor's Note: The majority of items consist of saddle-stitched booklets and folded pamphlets. Modern items are more likely to be plastic-coated or synthetic paper and in good condition. Items older than the 1960’s are generally more fragile and should be handled with care. Four different box shapes are used to accommodate the variety of shapes and sizes: standard letter-size boxes for booklets and fragile pamphlets, flip-top pamphlet boxes for sturdier pamphlets, flip-top photo boxes for pocket pamphlets under seven inches, and custom-size boxes for unique items. “Folders” in the pamphlet and photo boxes are not actually folders, but dividers that sit in front of the items they describe. Copyright: Request for permission to publish material from the collection must be submitted in writing to the Curator of Collections in the Cabot House of the Beverly Historical Society & Museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Portfolio Disclosure
    Schroders 29/05/2020 ASX Limited Schroders Investment Management Australia Limited ASX Market Announcements Office ABN:22 000 443 274 Exchange Centre Australian Financial Services Licence: 226473 20 Bridge Street Sydney NSW 2000 Level 20 Angel Place 123 Pitt Street Sydney NSW 2000 P: 1300 180 103 E: [email protected] W: www.schroders.com.au/GROW Schroder Real Return Fund (Managed Fund) Quarterly holdings disclosure for quarter ending 31 March 2020 Holdings on a full look through basis as at 31 March 2020 Weight Asset Name (%) 1&1 DRILLISCH AG 0.000% 1011778 BC / NEW RED FIN 4.25 15-MAY-2024 144a (SECURED) 0.002% 1011778 BC UNLIMITED LIABILITY CO 3.875 15-JAN-2028 144a (SECURED) 0.001% 1011778 BC UNLIMITED LIABILITY CO 4.375 15-JAN-2028 144a (SECURED) 0.001% 1011778 BC UNLIMITED LIABILITY CO 5.0 15-OCT-2025 144a (SECURED) 0.004% 1MDB GLOBAL INVESTMENTS LTD 4.4 09-MAR-2023 Reg-S (SENIOR) 0.011% 1ST SOURCE CORP 0.000% 21VIANET GROUP ADR REPRESENTING SI ADR 0.000% 2I RETE GAS SPA 1.608 31-OCT-2027 Reg-S (SENIOR) 0.001% 2I RETE GAS SPA 2.195 11-SEP-2025 Reg-S (SENIOR) 0.001% 2U INC 0.000% 360 SECURITY TECHNOLOGY INC A A 0.000% 360 SECURITY TECHNOLOGY INC A A 0.000% 361 DEGREES INTERNATIONAL LTD 0.000% 3D SYSTEMS CORP 0.000% 3I GROUP PLC 0.002% 3M 0.020% 3M CO 1.625 19-SEP-2021 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 1.75 14-FEB-2023 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 2.0 14-FEB-2025 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 2.0 26-JUN-2022 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 2.25 15-MAR-2023 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 2.75 01-MAR-2022 (SENIOR) 0.001% 3M CO 3.25 14-FEB-2024 (SENIOR) 0.002%
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Railroad Ballast Specification and Evaluation
    Transportation Research Record 1006 l Research on Railroad Ballast Specification and Evaluation GERALD P. RAYMOND ABSTRACT Research leading to recommended procedures for ballast selection and grading are presented. The ballast selection procedure is also presented and offers a sequential screening process to eliminate undesirable materials. The procedure classifies the surviving ballasts in terms of annual gross tonnage based on 30 tonne (33 ton) axle loading and American Railway Engineering Association grad­ ing No. 4. The effect of grading variation and its effect on track performance is also presented. From 1970 to 1978 Transport Canada Research and De­ color, and chemical composition. From a ballast per­ velopment Centre, Canadian National Railway Company, formance viewpoint, mineral hardness, generally and Canadian Pacific Limited cosponsored a research based on Mohs hardness scale, is of considerable im­ program at Queen's University through the Canadian portance. Institute of Guided Ground Transport to investigate Particular geological processes give rise to the stresses and deformations in the railway track three rock types, igneous, sedimentary, and meta­ structure and the support under dynamic and static morphic. Rock specimens may be used to classify the load systems. The findings and recommendations re­ rock type and also to provide information about the garding the specification for evaluating processed geological history of the area where it was located. rock , slag, and gravel railway ballast sources are This information is valuable to the ballast selec­ summarized in this paper. Comments are included tion process. about the new Canadian Pacific Rail ballast specif i­ cation, which was partially based on the findings presented by Raymond et al.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Index to Volume 77
    INDEX TO VOLUME 77 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2016 and 2017 by Kalmbach Publishing Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2017 THROUGH DECEMBER 2017 – 910 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak Capitol Limited at Point of Rocks, Md., Gallery, 10 minutes at Fassifern, In My Own Words, Jan 56-57 Mar 69 Aberdeen & Asheboro: Amtrak consists, Ask TRAINS, Nov 65 Sleepy short line to busy unit train host, Jun 24-31 (correc) Amtrak diners enter service,
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHAEOLOGICAL MASTER PLAN STUDY REPORT for the CITY of WINDSOR
    The City of Windsor ARCHAEOLOGICAL MASTER PLAN STUDY REPORT for the CITY OF WINDSOR Submitted to: City of Windsor Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Recreation Prepared by: Culture Resource Management Group Limited Fisher Archaeological Consulting Historic Horizon Inc. Dillon Consulting Limited CRM Group Project Number: 2000-004 OCTOBER 2005 Windsor Archaeological Master Plan City of Windsor Planning Report October 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1.0 The Windsor Archaeological Master Plan .............................. 1-1 1.1 Archaeological Background ...................................... 1-1 1.2 The City of Windsor and Archaeological Resource Management ......... 1-2 1.3 Objectives of the Study .......................................... 1-2 2.0 Historic Framework for Human Settlement in the Windsor Area ............ 2-1 2.1 Geological Setting .............................................. 2-1 2.2 Windsor Native History.......................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Paleo-Indian ............................................. 2-4 2.2.2 Native Peoples from the Archaic Horizon ...................... 2-6 2.2.3 Early and Middle Archaic .................................. 2-6 2.2.4 Late Archaic Peoples ...................................... 2-8 2.2.5 Early and Middle Woodland Peoples ........................ 2-10 2.2.6 Late Woodland Peoples ................................... 2-12 2.3 The Post-Contact Period: Thematic Overview of Euro-Canadian Settlement 2-14 2.3.1 Post-Contact Native Peoples ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Statements and Financial Statistics 1985
    CAISSE DE DEPOT ET_pj,C E ME NT DU QUEBEC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATISTICS 1985 CAISSE DE DEPOT ET LACEMENT DU SUEBEC INVESTMENTS IN CORPORATE SECURITIES 1985 INVESTMENTS IN CORPORATE SECURITIES as at December 31, 1985 (at market value - in thousands of dollars) ENTERPRISES Shares Convertible Bonds Subtotal-frier Total Number Amount securities Agnico-Eagle Mines Limited 286,438 6,158 6,158 Aiberta Energy Company Ltd. 367,070 6,378 6,378 Alcan Aluminium Limited' 8,472,256 342,068 342,068 AMCA International Limited 594,260 9,359 9,359 American Express Company 71,900 5,304 5,304 Arnsterdam-Rotherdam Bank NV 105,801 6,153 6,153 Artopex International Inc.' 1,018,954 4,484 4,484 Asamera Inc.' 2,514,644 30,176 30,176 Bank of Montreal common 3,945,121 136,107 136,107 warrants 99,938 574 574 136,681 Bank of Montreal, Realty Inc. 5,190 5,190 Bank of Nova Scotia 9,507,848 135,487 10,984 146,471 Bell Canada Enterprises Inc. 10,795,413 454,757 29,537 484,294 Bow Valley Industries Ltd.' 3,223,717 44,729 44,729 Brascade Holdings Inc. common 126,000 1,077 1,077 preferred A, B, C, D 447,000 160,446 160,446 161,523 Brascade Resources Inc. 2,758,621 37,603 37,603 Brascan Limited class A 212,175 7,559 7,559 7,559 Bristol-Myers Company 54,300 5,041 5,041 Brunswick Mining and Smelting Corporation Limited 1,256,674 16,337 16,337 CAE Industries Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Corporate Profile + Fact Book
    2008 corporate profile + fact book 2008 corporate profile + fact book table of contents 4 Financial summary 44 Integrated Operating Plan (IOP) 6 Key metrics 45 Interline management 10 System map (density) 46 Co-production 11 Corporate history 48 Information technology 12 Recent acquisition: DM&E 49 Safety 13 Company overview 51 Environment 14 Network 55 Community relations 17 Markets 57 Human resources i. Bulk 58 Labour relations ii. Merchandise iii. Intermodal 61 Governance 36 Canadian Pacific Logistics Solutions (CPLS) 63 Executive profiles 37 Motive power 65 Board of Directors 38 Freight car fleet 66 Financial data 40 Rail yards and intermodal terminals 70 Glossary 42 Repair facilities TSX / NYSE | CP forward-looking information This Corporate Profile and Fact Book contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (United States) and other relevant securities legislation relating but not limited to Canadian Pacific’s (CP) operations, anticipated financial performance, business prospects and strategies. Forward-looking information typically contains statements with words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “plan” or similar words suggesting future outcomes. Readers are cautioned to not place undue reliance on forward-looking information because it is possible that we will not achieve predictions, forecasts, projections and other forms of forward-looking information. In addition, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly or otherwise
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Canadian
    Reply to the Attention of François E.J. Tougas Direct Line 604.691.7425 Direct Fax 604.893.2359 Email Address [email protected] Our File No. 246623 Date November 18, 2016 BY EMAIL: [email protected] Canadian Transportation Agency 15 Eddy St Gatineau, Québec J8X 4B3 Attention: Consultations Re: Agency Consultation Regarding the Methodology for Determining the Capital Structure of Canadian National Railway Company (CN) and Canadian Pacific Railway Company (CP) for the Determination of the Cost of Capital of the two Railway Companies (the “Consultation”) Further to our submissions of October 14, 2016, and in response to the submissions of those who participated in the first phase of the Consultation, we are pleased to make these further submissions. Again, for the record, we are solicitors for Teck Resources Limited and its affiliates Teck Coal Limited and Teck Metals Limited (collectively, “Teck”) in connection with the Consultation. We have appended a further report of Dr. Lawrence I. Gould, Ph.D., Professor of Finance and Senior Scholar at the Asper Business School, University of Manitoba, together with letters from Teck, the Western Grain Elevator Association and the Canadian Canola Growers Association. As we understand it, the Agency places a high degree of reliance on the financial statements provided by CN and CP, as well as on their submissions with respect to capital structure, as demonstrated by the language of Appendix A of Agency Decision 425-R-2011. In particular, CN’s and CP’s capital structure to finance net rail investment seems to us to rely too heavily on decisions by CN and CP both as to the proportions and the amounts of debt and equity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 J
    Document generated on 10/02/2021 2:08 p.m. Histoire Québec The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 J. Derek Booth Volume 14, Number 3, 2009 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/11391ac See table of contents Publisher(s) Les Éditions Histoire Québec ISSN 1201-4710 (print) 1923-2101 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Booth, J. D. (2009). The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950. Histoire Québec, 14(3), 10–18. Tous droits réservés © Les Éditions Histoire Québec, 2009 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ VOL nin n \ ni i mi The impact of railways on Stanstead: 1850 to 1950 by J. Derek Booth D' J. Derek Booth was educated at McGill and is Professor Emeritus of Geography at Bishop's University. He is the author of several books on the role of railways in Quebec. This article is based on a lecture by Derek Booth on the occasion of the opening of the Stanstead Historical Society's Summer 2005 exhibition, "Arrival and Departure: The Regional Train." Le Dr J. Derek Booth a fait ses études à l'Université M'Gill; il est actuellement professeur émérite de géographie à l'Université Bishop's.
    [Show full text]
  • Donald W. Furler Collection
    Donald W. Furler Collection Finding Aid to the Collection at the Center for Railroad Photography & Art Prepared by Adrienne Evans Last updated: 06/19/19 Collection Summary Title: Donald W. Furler Collection Accession Number: 2017.1 Span Dates: 1931-1956 Bulk Dates: 1938-1952 Creator: Furler, Donald Ward, 1917-1994 Extent: 25 archival binders (8.34 linear feet) Language: English Repository: Center for Railroad Photography & Art, Madison, WI Abstract: This collection is composed of photographic images shot by Donald Ward Furler (1917-1994). The bulk of the collection was photographed by Furler, but it also includes work he collected from other rail photographers. Images in the collection primarily depict American railroads, mainly located in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. Selected Search Terms Country: Canada United States State: Alabama New York California North Dakota Colorado Ohio Connecticut Ontario (Canada) District of Columbia Pennsylvania Georgia Quebec (Canada) Illinois Saskatchewan (Canada) Iowa Tennessee Kansas Texas Maryland Vermont Massachusetts Virginia Minnesota West Virginia Missouri Montana Montreal (Canada) New Hampshire New Jersey Donald W. Furler Collection 2 Railroad Name: Franklin and Carolina Railroad (Camp A.A. Morrison and Company, Inc. Manufacturing Company) Adirondack Railway Grand Trunk Western Railroad Alton and Southern Railway Company Grand Trunk Railway Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Gifford-Hill and Company Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Harlem Transfer Company Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Pacific at the Glenbow: a Hundred Years of the CPR in Western Canada
    Canadian Pacific at the Glenbow: A Hundred Years of the CPR in Western Canada by GLENN T. WRIGHT All aboard! Two hundred and fifty historians, archivists, curators, and rail fans heard the traditional call of the railway porter and gathered at the Glenbow Museum last September to commemorate one hundred years of the Canadian Pacific Railway in Western Canada. Sponsored by the Glenbow-Alberta Institute with assistance from the National Museums Corporation and Canadian Pacific Limited. the festivities consisted of three major elements. In August the celebration began with the opening of the "Great CPR Exposition," a large exhibition that takes a comprehensive look at the construction, arrival and impact of the CPR on the Canadian West. During the month of September, the CPR West Conference attracted a good number of professionals and non-professionals and demonstrated that research on various aspects of CPR history is alive and well. To complement both the exhibition and the conference, Glenbow also sponsored the publication of a souvenir book, Trailoflron: The CPR andthe Birth qfthr West by William McKee and Georgeen Klassen. The centrepiece of Glenbow's tribute to the CPR is the6'Great CPR Exposition," the largest and most ambitious exhibition ever mounted by the Museum. Glenbow staff spent over two years collecting materials and conducting original research, and the result is impressive. The exhibition is an attempt to portray the history of the Canadian Pacific Railway and its impact on the social and economic development of Western Canada from the time of its inception and construction to the 1930s. Historical records have been drawn from virtually every media that one would find in an archives or museum.
    [Show full text]