Mark Burden, Academical Learning in the Dissenters' Private Academies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mark Burden, Academical Learning in the Dissenters' Private Academies 1 ACADEMICAL LEARNING IN THE DISSENTERS’ PRIVATE ACADEMIES, 1660-1720 A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Mark Burden English Department Queen Mary, University of London 2012 2 Abstract Previous assessments of the early academies of Protestant dissenters in England and Wales (1660-1720) have celebrated their tutors’ achievements in defying the Act of Uniformity and the Test Acts, and have argued that they pioneered a modern curriculum. Despite these views, there has been little scholarly investigation into the academies. This thesis evaluates the available sources for the first time, examining the political, philosophical, and theological controversies in which the academies were involved, as well as examining the lives and careers of their tutors and students in greater detail than has hitherto been possible. The introduction explores the reception of the academies from the late seventeenth century until the present day, exposing the paucity of evidence and the abundance of polemic which have characterised previous accounts. Chapter 1 provides a detailed examination of academies operated by nonconformists prior to the Toleration Act, reassessing the contribution of ejected university tutors, surveying attempted prosecutions, and highlighting political controversies. The second chapter extends the narrative to academies run by Protestant dissenters from the Toleration Act (1689) to the repeal of the Schism Act (1719); it contains the first-ever detailed analysis of the minutes of the London-based denominational Fund Boards, and a survey of the careers of former academy students. Chapter 3 re-evaluates the teaching of philosophy in the dissenters’ earliest academies, using newly-identified manuscript works by tutors and students to explore the study of logic, natural philosophy, and ethics. Chapter 4 uses a combination of printed and manuscript sources to examine the teaching of religious subjects at the academies, including preaching, religious history, Jewish antiquities, pneumatology, and theology; it concludes with a survey of the contribution of dissenting tutors and students to debates in the 1710s concerning subscription to an agreed form of words on the Trinity. Declaration: I declare this thesis to be entirely my own work. 3 Table of Contents Abstract 2 Table of Contents 3 Acknowledgments 5 List of Abbreviations 6 ACADEMICAL LEARNING IN THE DISSENTERS’ PRIVATE ACADEMIES, 1660-1720 Introduction Writing the history of the dissenters’ academies, 10 1693-2011 Samuel Wesley and the history of the dissenters’ academies 10 Edmund Calamy’s accounts of tutors 13 Table: Calamy’s descriptions of tutors 15 Eighteenth-century antiquarianism and the history of the dissenters’ 16 academies David Bogue and James Bennett, History of Dissenters (1808-14) 18 Walter Wilson’s Dissenting Churches and Meeting Houses, in London 20 (1808-12) Joshua Toulmin’s Historical View (1814) 23 Nineteenth-century antiquarians: Joshua Wilson and Joseph Hunter 27 Nineteenth and early twentieth-century county histories 30 Francis Nicholson, Ernest Axon, and Alexander Gordon 33 Irene Parker 36 Herbert McLachlan 38 J. W. Ashley Smith 39 Writing the history of the academies: 1954-2011 Chapter 1 Nonconformists and their academies, 1660-89 44 Nonconformist tutors and the Restoration religious settlements, 45 1659-1673 The earliest of the nonconformists’ academies: 1667-1673 54 The growth of the nonconformists’ academies, c. 1673-c. 1690 61 The prosecution of nonconformist tutors, 1662-90 81 The Stamford Oath 91 Conclusion: the decline of the nonconformists’ academies, 1679-1702 100 Chapter 2 The dissenters’ private academies, from the Toleration 102 Act (1689) to the repeal of the Schism Act (1719) Introduction 102 The Dissenters’ Academies after the Toleration Act, 1689-1719 103 Financing students: the denominational fund boards, 1690-1720 107 The dissenters’ academies and political controversies, 1702-1719 125 Conclusion: dissenting tutors and their students, 1689-1719 138 4 Chapter 3 Philosophy at the dissenters’ private academies 144 The subjects studied 145 Diagram 1: Charles Morton’s prefatory scheme of learning 147 Table 1: list of subjects taught at the dissenters’ early academies 154 Teaching methods 155 Logic: the instrumental science 165 The speculative sciences: physics and mathematics 180 The practical sciences: politics and ethics 193 Conclusion 202 Chapter 4 Religious subjects at the dissenters’ private academies 204 Church history and controversy 205 Jewish antiquities 213 Pneumatology 220 Religious instruction: preaching and theology 228 Systems of theology: Thomas Doolittle and Stephen James 236 The dissenters’ academies and the subscription controversy, 1713-19 244 Conclusion: the interaction of social and intellectual forces at the 252 dissenters’ private academies, 1660-1720 Appendices Appendix 1 Locations and dates of the dissenters’ private academies, 256 1660-c. 1720 Appendix 2 Allowances to tutors and students by the Common Fund, 263 Congregational Fund Board, and Presbyterian Fund Board, 1690-1751 Appendix 3 Students at the dissenters’ private academies, 272 c. 1660-c. 1720 Appendix 4 Education of ministers in the Common Fund Survey 294 (1690-2) Bibliography 1 List of manuscripts 299 2(a) Printed primary sources 309 2(b) Printed secondary sources 328 5 Acknowledgments A project such as this, in which an important objective has been to uncover many more sources than were previously known, incurs a great many debts. The research was funded by a grant from the Religion and Society Programme at the Arts and Humanities Research Council, and a bursary from Dr Williams’s Trust. Much of the primary research was undertaken in the British Library and the Bodleian Library, and I owe the librarians at both a very great deal. I have spent many happy hours at Harris Manchester College Library, Oxford, and at Bristol Baptist College Library; the librarians and archivists at both colleges receive my thanks for their kindness and generosity. I would also like to express my gratitude to the staff at John Rylands University Library (Manchester), Birmingham University Library, Harvard College Library, Senate House Library, and Queen Mary, University of London. I received warm welcome and encouragement at Lambeth Palace Library, the Royal Society Library and Archives, and the Wellcome Library. This thesis includes materials from Cheshire and Chester Archives, Devon Record Office (Exeter Branch), Gloucestershire Archives, Northumberland Record Office, Nottinghamshire Archives, Shropshire Archives, Suffolk Record Office (Ipswich Branch), Warwickshire Record Office, and the National Archives; I am grateful to everyone who works at these record offices, and at the numerous other archives which I have visited. Particular thanks must go to all the staff at Dr Williams’s Library and the Congregational Library, for their tireless academic endeavours and companionship over the last four years; together we have discovered more about the early academies than could ever have been hoped. In the last three years, four post-doctoral students have been at work on the eighteenth-century dissenting academies: the amount that I have learnt from Dr Simon Dixon, Dr Inga Jones, Dr Rosemary Dixon, and Dr Kyle Roberts is incalculable. My research has overlapped with that of three other PhD students who have been working in related areas: I am hugely indebted to Dr Tessa Whitehouse, Dr Stephen Burley, and Dr Simon Mills for sharing their skills, good sense, and friendship. From the ‘Dissenting Academies Project’, special thanks must go to Professor M. A. Stewart for his advice on logic, Dr David Bellhouse for reading an early draft of the section on mathematics, Professor John Gascoigne for his comments on dissenters’ science, and Professor Francoise Deconinck-Broissard for her thoughts on pedagogy. Dr Rick Kennedy has my gratitude for his assistance on the life and writings of Charles Morton. I would also like to thank my examiners Dr Mark Goldie and Dr Stephen Clucas. Above all, this project could not have been completed without the boundless knowledge, energy, enthusiasm, and time afforded to it (and me) by my supervisors, Professor Isabel Rivers and Dr David L. Wykes. 6 List of Abbreviations Ashley Smith J. W. Ashley Smith, The Birth of Modern Education. The Contribution of the Dissenting Academies, 1660- 1800 (London, 1954) Bogue and Bennett David Bogue and James Bennett, History of Dissenters, from the Revolution in 1688, to the Year 1808, 4 vols. (London, 1808-12) Brockett, Exeter Assembly The Exeter Assembly: The Minutes of the Assemblies of the United Brethren of Devon and Cornwall, 1691- 1717, ed. Allan Brockett (Torquay, 1963) Calamy, Account Edmund Calamy, An Abridgement of Mr. Baxter’s History of his Life and Times. With an Account of the Ministers, &c. who were Ejected after the Restauration, of King Charles II, 2 vols. (London, 1713), vol. 2 Calamy, Continuation Edmund Calamy, A Continuation of the Account of the Ministers, Lecturers, Masters and Fellows of Colleges, and Schoolmasters, who were Ejected and Silenced after the Restoration in 1660, By or Before the Act for Uniformity, 2 vols. (London, 1727) Calamy, Own Life Edmund Calamy, An Historical Account of My Own Life, with Some Reflections on the Times I have Lived in, 1671-1731, ed. J. T. Rutt, 2 vols. (London, 1829) Clegg, Diary James Clegg, Extracts from the Diary and Autobiography of the Rev. James Clegg, ed. Henry Kirke (Buxton, 1899) Clegg, John Ashe James Clegg, Assistance
Recommended publications
  • Rıchard Hooker: an Introductıon to Hıs Lıfe and Thought Torrance KIRBY
    İslâmÎ İlİmler derGİsİ, yıl 11 cİlt 11 sayı 2 Güz 2016 (69/81) rıchard hOOker: an ıntrOductıOn tO hıs lıfe and thOuGht Torrance KIRBY, McGill University, Montreal, Canada Abstract Richard Hooker (1554-1600) Richard Hooker was born in Devon, near Exeter in April 1554; he died at Bishopsbourne, Kent on 2 November 1600. From 1579 to 1585 he was a Fellow of Corpus Christi College, Oxford, and read the Hebrew Lecture at the University during this period. In 1585 Queen Elizabeth I appointed him Master of the Temple Church at the Inns of Court where he engaged in a preaching struggle with his assistant, Walter Travers. Their disagreement over the theological and political assumptions of the reformed Church of England as defined by the Act of Uniformity of 1559 and the Book of Common Prayer led to Hooker’s composition of his great work Of the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Politie (1593). The treatise consists of a lengthy preface which frames the polemical context, fol- lowed by eight books. The first four books address what he terms “gen- eral meditations”: (1) the nature of law in general, (2) the proper uses of the authorities of reason and revelation, (3) the application of the latter to the government of the church and (4) objections to practices inconsistent with the continental “reformed” example. The final four address the more “particular decisions” of the Church’s constitution: (5) public religious duties as prescribed by the Book of Common Prayer (1559), (6) the power of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, (7) the authority of bishops and (8) the supreme authority of the Prince in both church and commonwealth, and hence their unity in the Christian state.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissenters' Schools, 1660-1820
    Dissenters' Schools, 1660-1820. HE contributions of nonconformity to education have seldom been recognized. Even historians of dissent T have rarely done more than mention the academies, and speak of them as though they existed chiefly to train ministers, which was but a very; small part o:f their function, almost incidental. Tbis side of the work, the tecbnical, has again been emphasized lately by Dr. Shaw in the " Cambridge History of Modern Literature," and by Miss Parker in her " Dissenting Academies in England ": it needs tberefore no further mention. A 'brief study of the wider contribution of dissent, charity schools, clay schools, boarding schools, has been laid before the members of our Society. An imperfect skeleton, naming and dating some of the schoolmasters, may be pieced together here. It makes no 'P'r·et·ence to be exhaustive; but it deliberately: excludes tutors who were entirely engaged in the work of pre­ paring men for the ministry, so as to illustrate the great work clone in general education. It incorporates an analysis of the. I 66 5 returns to the Bishop of Exeter, of IVIurch's history of the Presbyterian and General Baptist Churches in the West, of Nightingale's history of Lancashire Nonconformity (marked N), of Wilson's history of dissenting churches in and near London. The counties of Devon, Lancaste.r, and Middlesex therefore are well represented, and probably an analysis of any county dissenting history would reveal as good work being done in every rplace. A single date marks the closing of the school. Details about many will be found in the Transactions of the Congregational Historical Society, to which references are given.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Church and State: a Diffusion of Reason and Religion
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 8-2006 Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion. Patricia Annettee Greenlee East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Greenlee, Patricia Annettee, "Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion." (2006). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2237. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2237 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion _________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University __________________ In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History _________________ by Patricia A. Greenlee August, 2006 _________________ Dr. Dale Schmitt, Chair Dr. Elwood Watson Dr. William Burgess Jr. Keywords: Separation of Church and State, Religious Freedom, Enlightenment ABSTRACT Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion by Patricia A.Greenlee The evolution of America’s religious liberty was birthed by a separate church and state. As America strides into the twenty first century the origin of separation of church and state continues to be a heated topic of debate.
    [Show full text]
  • EDITORIAL UR April Number Last Year Recorded the Death of Dr
    EDITORIAL UR April number last year recorded the death of Dr. _ Nightingale, our President, and M:r. H. A. Muddiman, O our Treasurer. This year we have the sorrowful duty of chronicling the death of the Rev. William Pierce, M.A., for many years ·Secretary of the Society and Dr. Nightingale's successor as President. The Congregational Historical Society has had no more devoted member and officer than M:r. Pierce, and it is difficult to imagine a meeting of the Society without him. He spent his life in the service of the Congregational churches and filled some noted pastorates, including those at New Court, Tollington Park, and Doddridge, Northampton, but he contrived to get through an immense amount of historical research-for many years he had a special table in the North Library of the British Museum. He has left three large volumes as evidence of his industry and his en­ thusiasm-An Historical Introduction to the Marprektte Tracts, The Marprel,ate Tracts, and John Penry. They are all valuable works, perhaps the reprint of the Tracts especially so, for it not only makes easy of access comparatively rare pamphlets, but it enables us to rebut at once and for always the extraordinary statements made time and again-by writers who obviously have never read the Tracts-to the effect that they are scurri­ lous, indecent, &c., &c. In this volume Pierce had not much opportunity to show his prejudices, and therefore the volume is his nearest approach to scientific history. The faculty which made him so delightful a companion-the vigour with which he held his views and denounced those who disagreed with him-sometimes led him from the impartiality which should mark the ideal historian : ~ he could damn a bishop he was perfectly happy! But his bias Is always obvious : it never misleads, and it will not prevent his work from living on and proving of service to all students .of Elizabethan religious history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition
    The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America Kelly Shackelford Executive Editor 2017 CHURCHES & MINISTRIES EDITION UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition Editorial Team Kelly Shackelford Executive Editor Justin Butterfield Editor-in-chief Contributors Abigail Doty Mary Katherine McNabb Stephanie Taub Past Contributors Michael Andrews Bryan Clegg Julie Hennighausen Candice Lundquist UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition Kelly Shackelford, executive editor Justin Butterfield, editor-in-chief Copyright © 2013–2017 First Liberty Institute. All rights reserved. This publication is not to be used for legal advice. Because the law is constantly changing and each factual situation is unique, First Liberty Institute and its attorneys do not warrant, either expressly or impliedly, that the law, cases, statutes, and rules discussed or cited in this publication have not been subject to change, amendment, reversal, or revision. If you have a legal question or need legal advice, please contact an attorney. First Liberty Institute’s attorneys may be contacted by going to www.firstliberty.org, selecting the “Contact” menu option at the top of the page, and then selecting “Request Legal Assistance.” First Liberty Institute 2001 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 1600 Plano, Texas 75075 (972) 941–4444 WHAT IS FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE? First Liberty Institute is the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans. A non-profit law firm, First Liberty handles hundreds of legal matters each year at no cost to its clients and educates Americans regarding the first liberty in the Bill of Rights: religious liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • 1922 Addresses Gordon.Pdf
    Addresses Biographical and Historical ALEXANDER GORDON, M.A. tc_' Sometime Lecturer in Ecclesiastical History in the University of fifanclzester VETUS PROPTER NO VUM DEPROMETIS THE LINDSEY PRESS 5 ESSEX STREET, STRAND, LONDON, W.C.2 1922 www.unitarian.org.uWdocs PREFATORY NOTE With three exceptions the following Addresses were delivered at the openings of Sessions of the Unitarian Home Missionary College, in Manchester, where the author was Principal from 1890 to 1911. The fifth Address (Salters' Hall) was delivered at the Opening Meeting of the High Pavement Historical Society, in Nottingham; the seventh (Doddridge) at Manchester College, in Oxford, in connection with the Summer Meeting of University Extension students ; The portrait prefixed is a facsimile, f~llsize, of the first issue of the original engraving by Christopher Sichem, from the eighth (Lindsey) at the Unitarian Institute, in the British Museum copy (698. a. 45(2)) of Grouwele.~,der Liverpool. vooruzaeutzster Hooft-Kettereuz, Leyden, 1607. In this volume the Addresses are arranged according to the chronology of their subjects; the actual date of delivery is added at the close of each. Except the first and the fifth, the Addresses were printed, shortly after delivery, in the Ch~istianLife newspaper ; these two (also the third) were printed separately; all have been revised, with a view as far as possible to reduce overlapping and to mitigate the use of the personal pronoun. Further, in the first Address it has been necessary to make an important correction in reference to the parentage of Servetus. Misled by the erroneous ascription to him of a letter from Louvain in 1538 signed Miguel Villaneuva (see the author's article Printed it1 Great Britain by on Servetus in the Encyclopwdia Britannica, also ELSOM& Co.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reception of Hobbes's Leviathan
    This is a repository copy of The reception of Hobbes's Leviathan. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/71534/ Version: Published Version Book Section: Parkin, Jon (2007) The reception of Hobbes's Leviathan. In: Springborg, Patricia, (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Hobbes's Leviathan. The Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, Religion and Culture . Cambridge University Press , Cambridge , pp. 441-459. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521836670.020 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ jon parkin 19 The Reception of Hobbes’s Leviathan The traditional story about the reception of Leviathan was that it was a book that was rejected rather than read seriously.1 Leviathan’s perverse amalgamation of controversial doctrine, so the story goes, earned it universal condemnation. Hobbes was outed as an athe- ist and discredited almost as soon as the work appeared. Subsequent criticism was seen to be the idle pursuit of a discredited text, an exer- cise upon which young militant churchmen could cut their teeth, as William Warburton observed in the eighteenth century.2 We need to be aware, however, that this was a story that was largely the cre- ation of Hobbes’s intellectual opponents, writers with an interest in sidelining Leviathan from the mainstream of the history of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Protestants, Evangelicals, and the Religious Order: Christianity and Political Conservatism in the United Kingdom and United States from 1530 to 1950
    Protestants, Evangelicals, and the Religious Order: Christianity and Political Conservatism in the United Kingdom and United States from 1530 to 1950 An Honors Thesis Presented by Duncan Mayer Robb to Curriculum and Honors Committee Department of Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a degree with honors of Bachelor of Arts University of Oregon June 2009 Thesis Advisor: Dr. Craig Parsons Second Reader: Dr. Joseph Lowndes 2 The British monarch holds a number of titles and distinctions. “Defender of the Faith and Supreme Governor of the Church of England” is only one of them and carries little practical importance – no more than “Commandant-in-Chief of the Royal Air Force” or “Lord High Admiral of the Royal Navy.” But, the former distinction, bestowed upon all Sovereigns of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, is perhaps the most obvious example of the tie that exists between Church and State there. However, while this link is born of a historic symbiotic relationship between the Church of England and British government, politics and public life today have a distant association with religious matters. Prayer in schools, though mandated by British common law, is often not practiced daily, weekly, or even monthly (Lords 19 Apr. 2007). While Church of England bishops do sit in the House of Lords, which indeed possesses some real power, most notably derived from its judicial authority roughly equivalent to the American Supreme Court, the upper house’s power and influence pales in comparison to that of the House of Commons across the hall (Nash).
    [Show full text]
  • ©2011 Steven M. Kawczak All Rights Reserved
    ©2011 STEVEN M. KAWCZAK ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BELIEFS AND APPROACHES TO DEATH AND DYING IN LATE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Steven M. Kawczak December, 2011 BELIEFS AND APPROACHES TO DEATH AND DYING IN LATE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLAND Steven M. Kawczak Dissertation Approved: Accepted: ____________________________ ____________________________ Advisor Department Chair Michael F. Graham, Ph.D. Michael Sheng, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the College Michael Levin, Ph.D. Chand K. Midha, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Constance Bouchard, Ph.D. George R. Newkome, Ph.D. ____________________________ ____________________________ Faculty Reader Date Howard Ducharme, Ph.D. ____________________________ Faculty Reader Matthew Crawford, Ph.D. ii ABSTRACT This dissertation is about death and its relationship to religion in late seventeenth- century England. The primary argument is that while beliefs about death stemmed from the Reformation tradition, divergent religious reforms of Puritanism and Arminianism did not lead to differing approaches to death. People adapted religious ideas on general terms of Protestant Christianity and not specifically aligned with varying reform movements. This study links apologetics and sermons concerning spiritual death, physical death, and remedies for each to cultural practice through the lens of wills and graves to gauge religious influence. Readers are reminded of the origins of reformed thought, which is what seventeenth-century English theologians built their ideas upon. Religious debates of the day centered on the Puritan and Arminian divide, which contained significantly different ideas of soteriology, a key aspect of a good death in the English ars moriendi.
    [Show full text]
  • How English Baptists Changed the Early Modern Toleration Debate
    RADICALLY [IN]TOLERANT: HOW ENGLISH BAPTISTS CHANGED THE EARLY MODERN TOLERATION DEBATE Caleb Morell Dr. Amy Leonard Dr. Jo Ann Moran Cruz This research was undertaken under the auspices of Georgetown University and was submitted in partial fulfillment for Honors in History at Georgetown University. MAY 2016 I give permission to Lauinger Library to make this thesis available to the public. ABSTRACT The argument of this thesis is that the contrasting visions of church, state, and religious toleration among the Presbyterians, Independents, and Baptists in seventeenth-century England, can best be explained only in terms of their differences over Covenant Theology. That is, their disagreements on the ecclesiological and political levels were rooted in more fundamental disagreements over the nature of and relationship between the biblical covenants. The Baptists developed a Covenant Theology that diverged from the dominant Reformed model of the time in order to justify their practice of believer’s baptism. This precluded the possibility of a national church by making baptism, upon profession of faith, the chief pre- requisite for inclusion in the covenant community of the church. Church membership would be conferred not upon birth but re-birth, thereby severing the links between infant baptism, church membership, and the nation. Furthermore, Baptist Covenant Theology undermined the dominating arguments for state-sponsored religious persecution, which relied upon Old Testament precedents and the laws given to kings of Israel. These practices, the Baptists argued, solely applied to Israel in the Old Testament in a unique way that was not applicable to any other nation. Rather in the New Testament age, Christ has willed for his kingdom to go forth not by the power of the sword but through the preaching of the Word.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Speech, Free Minds, Free Religion UCOT, Taos, NM Rev
    Free Speech, Free Minds, Free Religion UCOT, Taos, NM Rev. Munro Sickafoose June 4, 2017 So.. let’s delve into a little history. Our religious heritage traces back to the English Dissenters – Protestant Christians who separated from the Church of England in 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. At that time, church and state were largely inseparable entities, and they dictated what people could officially believe and how they worshipped. Religion reinforced the authority of the monarchy, and the state enforced the standards of the church. Dissenters were those who disagreed with this state of affairs in one way or another. But the Reformation and the Enlightenment had unleashed the winds of freedom, and dissenting religious and political factions abounded in England at the time. It’s an intriguing exercise to read the names of some of them: Anabaptists, Barrowists, Behmenists, Brownists, Diggers, Enthusiasts, Grindletonians, Levellers, Muggletonians, Puritans, Quakers, Ranters, Rationalists, Sabbatarians, Seekers, Socinians. Whatever their flavor, the dissenters typically paid a heavy price by standing up for their beliefs – they were, after all, speaking out against the church or the state, or both. It was illegal to gather to worship in the way they wanted to. And punishments were severe in those times. One could lose a nose, or an ear, irrevocably marked as a traitor for life. Prisons were brutal exercises in survival. And transport to the New World became a way to rid the Isles of these dangerous men and women. Many of them, of course, also came voluntarily to the new American colonies, seeking a place where they could practice their religious beliefs and implement their political ideas, and the great majority of American religions have been from one dissenting tradition or another – even those we consider mainstream, like Baptists and Methodists.
    [Show full text]
  • LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES GAOL DELIVERY SESSIONS at the OLD BAILEY POST-1754 OB Page 1 Reference Description Dates CALENDARS
    LONDON METROPOLITAN ARCHIVES Page 1 GAOL DELIVERY SESSIONS AT THE OLD BAILEY POST-1754 OB Reference Description Dates CALENDARS AND INDEXES Calendars of indictments OB/C/J/001 List of Newgate prisoners indicted for trial at the 1754 Oct-1773 Not available for general access Old Bailey Dec Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/037 OB/C/J/002 List of Newgate prisoners indicted for trial at the 1774 Jan-1790 Not available for general access Old Bailey Dec Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/048; X001/182 OB/C/J/003 List of Newgate prisoners indicted for trial at the 1791 Jan-1811 Not available for general access Old Bailey Dec Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/037 OB/C/J/004 List of Newgate prisoners indicted for trial at the 1812 Jan-1824 Not available for general access Old Bailey Jan Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/038 OB/C/J/005 List of Newgate prisoners indicted for trial at the 1824 Apr-1832 Not available for general access Old Bailey Nov Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/038 Calendars of prisoners OB/C/P/001 List of Newgate prisoners awaiting trial at the 1820 Jan 12 Not available for general access Old Bailey -1820 Dec 6 Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/039 Please use microfilm OB/C/P/002 List of Newgate prisoners awaiting trial at the 1821 Jan 10 Not available for general access Old Bailey -1821 Dec 5 Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/039 Please use microfilm OB/C/P/003 List of Newgate prisoners awaiting trial at the 1822 Jan 9 Not available for general access Old Bailey -Dec 4 Please use microfilm 1 volume X071/039 Please use
    [Show full text]