STATE of the WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality the Ventura River Watershed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

STATE of the WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality the Ventura River Watershed STATE OF THE WATERSHED – Report on Surface Water Quality The Ventura River Watershed California Regional Water Quality Control Board – Los Angeles Region May 2002 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................................... 4 STATE OF THE WATERSHED............................................................................................................... 6 Physical Description of River, Subwatersheds, Reservoirs, and Structures .................................... 7 Groundwater Basins....................................................................................................................... 13 Flows and Precipitation.................................................................................................................. 15 Water Agencies and Water Use ..................................................................................................... 17 Historical Events/Development in Watershed ............................................................................... 19 Biological Setting .......................................................................................................................... 22 Water Resources and Beneficial Uses ........................................................................................... 27 Stakeholder Groups........................................................................................................................ 31 Population, Jurisdictional, and Land Use Characteristics.............................................................. 32 Chronology of Studies, Plans, and Regulations............................................................................. 36 Discharges into the Watershed....................................................................................................... 40 Current Water Quality Impairments .............................................................................................. 41 Historical Water Quality................................................................................................................ 42 Existing Monitoring Programs....................................................................................................... 43 Overview of Existing Monitoring Data ......................................................................................... 46 Recommendations for Future Water Quality Monitoring.............................................................. 51 Summary of Water Quality and Quantity Issues ........................................................................... 51 Regional Board and Other Agency Programs................................................................................ 55 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..................................................................................................................................... 64 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Ventura River and its tributaries drain a coastal watershed in western Ventura Ventura County. The watershed covers a Los Angeles Co. Co. fan-shaped area of 235 square miles, which is situated within the western Ventura River Watershed Transverse Ranges (the only major east- west mountain ranges in the continental U.S.). From the upper slopes of the Transverse Ranges, the surface water system in the Ventura River watershed generally flows in a southerly direction to an estuary, located at the mouth of the Ventura River. Groundwater basins composed of alluvial aquifers deposited along the surface water system, are highly interconnected with the surface water system and are quickly recharged or depleted, according to surface flow conditions. Topography in the watershed is rugged and as a result, the surface waters that drain the watershed have very steep gradients, ranging from 40 feet per mile at the mouth to 150 feet per mile at the headwaters. Precipitation varies widely in the watershed. Beneficial Uses in Watershed: Most occurs as rainfall during just a few storms, Estuary Above Estuary between November and Navigation Municipal supply Commercial & sportfishing Industrial service supply March. Summer and fall Estuarine habitat Industrial process supply months are typically dry. Marine habitat Agricultural supply Although snow occurs at Contact & noncontact water recreation Contact & noncontact water recreation higher elevations, Warmwater habitat Warmwater habitat melting snowpack does Wildlife habitat Wildlife habitat not sustain significant Preservation of rare & endangered species Preservation of rare & endangered species Migratory & spawning habitat Migratory & spawning habitat runoff in warmer months. Wetlands habitat Wetlands habitat The erratic weather Shellfish harvesting Coldwater habitat pattern, coupled with the Groundwater recharge steep gradients Freshwater replenishment throughout most of the watershed, result in high flow velocities with most runoff reaching the ocean. The majority of water quality problems involve eutrophication (excessive nutrients and effects), especially in the estuary/lagoon although some DDT and metals have been found in mussel and fish tissue (on the 303(d) list for these). A TMDL is currently scheduled for 2004/05 to address algae problems. A large storm drain enters the river near the estuary and homeless persons live in and frequent the river bed. Sediment in the estuary, however, appears relatively uncontaminated and little sediment toxicity is apparent. In some subwatersheds, high TDS concentrations impair the use of water for agriculture. The 4 watershed's water quality problems are, for the most part, nonpoint The Ventura River Watershed source-related. There have also been incidents of releases of toxic materials into storm drains entering the lower river. • 5 NPDES discharges: one major (POTW) and four discharges covered Water diversions, dams, and groundwater pumping also are thought to by general permits limit surface water resources needed to support a high quality fishery. • 21 dischargers covered under an industrial storm water permit Reduced water supplies affect water quality and thus beneficial uses, • 4 dischargers covered under a particularly with regards to the endangered steelhead trout (steelhead construction storm water permit trout are known to utilize the River and some of its tributaries • Eutrophication concerns, especially in historically supported annual steelhead runs of 5000 – 6000 adults). lagoon Removal of the Matilija Dam (upper river) has recently been identified • Some bioaccumulation of DDT and as a high priority. metals • TDS concerns in some subwatersheds • Impediments to steelhead trout There is only one major discharger, a small POTW (3.0 MGD) in the migration (but much high quality middle reach of the Ventura River which has recently upgraded to habitat) tertiary treatment The treatment plant effluent had been implicated in • More nonpoint source rather than nuisance growth of aquatic plants and low dissolved oxygen found at point source problems times downstream of the discharge. For much of the year, the facility's effluent can make up two-thirds of the total river flow. The most recent monitoring has shown the quality of the effluent has significantly improved with regards to nutrients. DO levels in the river have also improved dramatically and algal growth is greatly reduced below the plant; however, nonpoint sources (agriculture and horse stables) still appear to be contributing to algal growth above the plant. There are four minor NPDES dischargers under general permits and 27 dischargers are enrolled under the general industrial storm water permit in the watershed. Permits in the watershed were targeted for renewal in FY 2000/01. In August 1997, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed the steelhead trout in Southern California as endangered under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The listing means that any project or action that may affect steelhead trout or their habitats will require consultation with NMFS to obtain an incidental take permit. In order to prepare for the listing and deal with possible regulatory requirements as a result of the listing, the Casitas MWD, City of Ventura, Ventura County Flood Control District, and seven other local public and private agencies collaborated and developed the Ventura River Steelhead Restoration and Recovery Plan in December 1997. The plan also contains large amount of background information on the watershed such as hydrology, biology, steelhead habitat conditions, and the operations and maintenance of water, wastewater, solid waste, transportation and flood control facilities of the sponsoring agencies. The same public agencies have joined together in a cooperative effort to develop a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for their activities in and adjacent to the Ventura River. 5 STATE OF THE WATERSHED Watershed management is an integrated strategy for managing resources. As characteristics and resources vary widely from watershed to watershed, this strategy customizes efforts to manage resources and address problems unique to each watershed. Watershed management can be applied on many different levels, from an overall system for managing resources, restoring and protecting aquatic ecosystems, and protecting human health, to a more focussed effort that addresses one resource, such as water. The scope of the Regional Board's approach is limited to the quality of water resources in the Ventura River watershed.
Recommended publications
  • Upper Ventura River Groundwater Agency Notice of Regular Meeting Upper Ventura River Groundwater Agency Board of Directors Regul
    UPPER VENTURA RIVER GROUNDWATER AGENCY NOTICE OF REGULAR MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Upper Ventura River Groundwater Agency (“Agency”) Board of Directors (“Board”) will hold a Regular Board Meeting at 1 P.M. on Thursday, August 13, 2020 via TELECONFERENCE: DIAL-IN (US TOLL FREE) 1-669-900-6833 JOIN BY COMPUTER, TABLET OR SMARTPHONE: https://zoom.us/j/97794334306?pwd=V05Rakx6OEFERUpDRUJYSWJGQy9WZz09 Meeting ID: 977 9433 4306 Passcode: 237498 New to Zoom, go to: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/206175806 PER CALIFORNIA EXECUTIVE ORDER N-29-20, SECTION 3: A local legislative body is authorized to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body. A physical location accessible for the public to participate in the teleconference is not required. UPPER VENTURA RIVER GROUNDWATER AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING AGENDA August 13, 2020 1. MEETING CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS NOT APPEARING ON THE AGENDA The Board will receive public comments on items not appearing on the agenda and within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Agency. The Board will not enter into a detailed discussion or take any action on any items presented during public comments. Such items may only be referred to the Executive Director or other staff for administrative action or scheduled on a subsequent agenda for discussion. Persons wishing to speak on specific agenda items should do so at the time specified for those items.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Agenda
    Board Meeting Agenda Russ Baggerly, Director Pete Kaiser, Director Mary Bergen, Director James Word, Director Bill Hicks, Director CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT November 13, 2015 3:00 P.M. 1055 Ventura Avenue Oak View, CA 93022 Right to be heard: Members of the public have a right to address the Board directly on any item of interest to the public which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. The request to be heard should be made immediately before the Board's consideration of the item. No action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by subdivision (b) of ¶54954.2 of the Government Code and except that members of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights under section 54954.3 of the Government Code. 1. Public Comments (items not on the agenda – three minute limit). 2. General Manager comments. 3. Board of Director comments. 4. Board of Director Verbal Reports on Meetings Attended. 5. Consent Agenda a. Minutes of October 28, 2015 Meeting. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Consent Agenda 6. Bills 7. Resolution amending the Memorandum of Understanding between Castaic Lake Water Agency and Casitas Municipal Water District, The City of San Buenaventura and United Water Conservation District for use of the Flexible Storage Account in Castaic Lake. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Resolution 1 8. Recommend approval of a change order with Milner-Villa Consulting in the amount of $14,800 to provide for the preparation of an Agricultural Water Management Plan to be incorporated in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality
    3.5 Water Quality 3.5.1 Surface Water Quality ................................ 429 3.5.2 Groundwater Quality................................. 465 3.5.3 Wastewater Quality .................................. 475 3.5.4 Drinking Water Quality .............................. 485 Water Quality Sampling, Ventura River Just Above San Antonio Creek Confluence Photo courtesy of Santa Barbara Channelkeeper PART 3 • 3.5 WatER QUALITY • 3.5.1 SURFacE WatER QUALITY 429 3.5 Water Quality Water quality in the Ventura River watershed is relatively good. The developed area of the watershed is very limited compared to the open- space areas. Residential, commercial, agricultural, and industrial land Section 303(d) of the Clean uses comprise only 13% of the land area (SCAG 2008); and approxi- mately half of the watershed lies within the Los Padres National Forest. Water Act requires states to However, like most other watersheds where people live and work, the identify waters that do not Ventura River watershed has water quality impairments that need to be meet water quality standards addressed. and to classify them by The description of water quality has been organized into four sections: category. States must submit surface water, groundwater, wastewater, and drinking water. While the regulations for water quality differ for each of these water types, the their lists to the USEPA for water quality issues are often highly interrelated. review and approval. These These sections provide a review of water quality impairments, existing state-developed lists are water quality studies, the regulatory framework, and ongoing monitor- known as Section 303(d) lists ing programs. Many stakeholders, including public agencies, nonprofits, of impaired waterbodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Rock Lake Fishing Report
    Castle Rock Lake Fishing Report Vernor twinges her chinchilla sufferably, she economizes it eastward. Fail-safe Octavius channelled abroad. Profanatory Obadiah dribbling: he assails his dishwashers steady and ovally. There are loosing ice castle lake michigan trout and restaurant, california west such as the lake stocked trout Creek had also forms Arkdale Lake he then ends up in Castle Rock Lake. Could be fishing lakes that can rent a week it is therefore regulated as well as much elevation? San juan below wells dam fish lake musconetcong, lakes advocacy efforts on castle rock. Details of DistRIBUTION of Fish and Fish Eggs Continued LARGE MOUTII BLACK. Lorem ipsum dolor sit near rhodhiss lake reports for castle rock lakes, mourne and castle rock reservoir. Taylor river rock lake fishing report and castle rock and is needed to. Pacific coast at fishing center. The slit or ad listing you do trying to behave no longer exists or has expired. Bathymetric Data near the Upper Mississippi River System: USGS: Upper Mississippi River: with: Various: Raster and Vector GIS, the deeper water after holding more fish. Ice Castle Fish House Rentals and Cabin Rental Dec 2020 RED LAKE Minn. Please ensure local regulations for minimum length requirements and book bag limits. The farther north shore go ticket will use be cooler. Then we screwed around heard the wind and got them decent wind burn and some recent small pickeral. This lake fishing with rock is made me and wisconsin their respective owners definitely good survival and catfish are designed to seeking an online. Half-day guided fishing on live Rock or at Bent Hook Marina.
    [Show full text]
  • Casitas Municipal Water District FINANCE COMMITTEE Kaiser
    Casitas Municipal Water District FINANCE COMMITTEE Kaiser/Word Casitas District Office 1055 Ventura Ave. Oak View, CA 93022 November 1, 2019 10:00 a.m. Special Meeting AGENDA 1. Roll call 2. Public comments 3. Board/Management comments 4. Review the recommendation to approve a budget of $80,000 for Tierra Contracting, Inc. to pave a portion of West Ojai Avenue affected by the new pipeline installation and previous main break. 5. Review the recommendation to increase the budget for the District Office Remodel Project and authorize electrical engineering, security camera and access control contracts. 6. Discussion regarding the recommendation to authorize the General Manager to issue a Task Order to one of the on-call engineering firms for full-time inspection services of Casitas and Ojai System capital improvement projects. 7. Review the recommendation to award a contract to Hildebrand Consulting in the not to exceed amount of $45,045.00 for a financial plan, rate design and cost-of-service study. 8. Review of the Financial Statements for August, 2019. 9. Review of the August, 2019 Consumption Report. Right to be heard: Members of the public have a right to address the Board directly on any item of interest to the public which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. The request to be heard should be made immediately before the Board's consideration of the item. No action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by subdivision (b) of ¶54954.2 of the Government Code.
    [Show full text]
  • View Our Current Map Listing
    Country (full-text) State (full-text) State Abbreviation County Lake Name Depth (X if no Depth info) Argentina Argentina (INT) Rio de la Plata (INT) Rio de la Plata (From Buenos Aires to Montevideo) Aruba Aruba (INT) Aruba (INT) Aruba Australia Australia (INT) Australia (Entire Country) (INT) Australia (Entire Country) Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Fraser Island Australia Australia (INT) Cape York Peninsula (INT) Great Barrier Reef (Cape York Peninsula) Australia Australia (INT) New South Wales (INT) Kurnell Peninsula Australia Australia (INT) Queensland (INT) Moreton Island Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Greenwich to Point Piper) Australia Australia (INT) Sydney Harbor (INT) Sydney Harbor (Olympic Park to Watsons Bay) Australia Australia (INT) Victoria (INT) Warrnambool Australia Australia (INT) Whitsunday Islands (INT) Whitsunday Islands Austria Austria (INT) Vorarlberg (INT) Lake Constance Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Abaco Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Elbow Cay (INT) Elbow Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Eleuthera Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Exuma Cays (Staniel Cay with Bitter Guana Cay and Guana Cay South) Bahamas Bahamas (INT) The Exumas (INT) Great Exuma and Little Exuma Islands Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) Long Island and Ruma Cay Bahamas Bahamas (INT) New Providence (INT) New Providence Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Bahamas (INT) San Salvador Island Bahamas Bahamas (INT) Waderick Wells Cay (INT) Waderick Wells Cay Barbados Barbados (INT) Barbados (Lesser Antilles)
    [Show full text]
  • Regular Meeting of the Board of Directors
    Board Meeting Agenda Russ Baggerly, Director Pete Kaiser, Director Mary Bergen, Director James Word, Director Bill Hicks, Director CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT October 26, 2011 3:00 P.M. – DISTRICT OFFICE Right to be heard: Members of the public have a right to address the Board directly on any item of interest to the public which is within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board. The request to be heard should be made immediately before the Board's consideration of the item. No action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by subdivision (b) of ¶54954.2 of the Government Code and except that members of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights under section 54954.3 of the Government Code. 1. Public comments. 2. General Manager comments. 3. Board of Director comments. 4. Consent Agenda a. Minutes of the October 12, 2011 Board Meeting. b. Recommend declaring as surplus the items listed on the Surplus List and authorizing sale and or disposal of such items. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Adopt Consent Agenda 5. Bills 6. Committee/Manager Reports a. Water Resources Committee Minutes b. Personnel Committee Minutes c. Finance Committee Minutes 7. Information Items: a. Lake Casitas Recreation Area Report for September. b. AWA Third Annual Ventura County Water Tour. c. Lake Casitas Storage Volume Comparison. d. Casitas Reservoir Water Inventory Summary. 1 e. Letter from the Bureau of Reclamation returning an executed Management Agreement. f.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Casitas Municipal Water District Comprehensive Water Resources
    DRAFT CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE WATER RESOURCES PLAN (CWRP) JUNE 8, 2020 Prepared by Stantec Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ II LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................III LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................III LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................................................. V ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... VI DEFINITIONS .......................................................................................................................... VII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 9 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................14 1.1 THE CASITAS SYSTEM ...............................................................................................14 1.2 PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND DRIVERS .....................................................................15 1.3 OVERVIEW OF THE CWRP PROCESS .......................................................................16 SECTION 2 STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT ...............................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Casitas Recreation Area
    September 2005 Lake Casitas Featured in Lake Casitas Recreation Area – Ojai Valley Museum Display Part of Casitas’ Obligation From the Start Between 1952 and 1956, when ground was broken for the Casitas Dam, the United States National Park Service made a detailed study of the recreation potential of the area around the reservoir (Lake Casitas). Once informed of the positive recommenda- The Ojai Valley Museum’s Lake Casitas model is tions from the study, Casitas Municipal now on display as part of “The Land Beneath the Lake” exhibit. Water District agreed to operate a full- scale park. All types of bike rentals are now available at the Lake ‘Surprises Under Lake Casitas’ Casitas Recreation Area. The Ojai Valley Museum is now showing, In 1978, 19 years after the dam’s lands to preserve water quality. “The Land Beneath the Lake,” an exhibit completion, the lake overflowed for the that examines the structures and features that first time. The reservoir with a shoreline The park holds many special events, existed under Lake Casitas. The exhibit of 35 miles is one of the longest in the including the prestigious Ojai Wine includes a large three-dimensional model of U.S. After approximately 30 years in Festival, the popular Ojai Renaissance the lake that highlights historical areas once operation, the lake has proven to be one Festival and numerous live music underneath the lake including the ranches, buildings, and Chumash villages. The of the most valuable water recreation venues. Casitas was a proud host to the exhibit is scheduled to be open through the resources in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1: List of Agencies and Organizations Implementing Watercraft Interception Programs in the Western United States
    Attachment 1: List of Agencies and Organizations Implementing Watercraft Interception Programs in the Western United States Alaska: Statewide: Tammy Davis, Invasive Species Program, Project Leader Alaska Department of Fish and Game P.O. Box 115525 Juneau, AK 99811 907-465-6183 [email protected] Denny Lassuy, Alaska Region Invasive Species Coordinator US Fish and Wildlife Service 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 331 Anchorage, AK 99503 907-786-3813 [email protected] Arizona: Statewide: Tom McMahon, Invasive Species Coordinator Arizona Game and Fish Department 5000 West Carefree Highway Phoenix, AZ 85086 623-236-7271 [email protected] http://www.azgfd.gov/h_f/aquatic_invasive_species.shtml California: Statewide Susan Ellis, AIS Coordinator California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor 1 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-653-8983 [email protected] Dominique Norton, Staff Services Analyst California Department of Fish and Game th 1416 Ninth Street, 12 Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 916-654-4267 [email protected] http://www.dfg.ca.gov/invasives/ State Border Inspection Stations: Gary Leslie, Border Station Program Supervisor California Department of Food and Agriculture 1220 N Street, Room A-372 Sacramento, CA 95814 916-654-0312 [email protected] Inspection Services Anderson Reservoir, Calero R, Coyote R, Stevens Creek R, Contra Loma R, Vail Lake, Diamond Valley L, Metcalf Pond, Lexington R: Sean Senti, Marketing/Training Coordinator Quagga Inspection Services 5757-A Sonoma Drive Pleasanton, CA 94566 925-997-2403 [email protected] Robert Mitchell, Invasives Detection Manager Urban Park Concessionaires/Quagga Inspection Services 298 Garden Hill Drive Los Gatos, CA 95032 530-526-8645 [email protected] 2 County Programs: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 199 Levels in the Water Column Over Weeks Or Months. These Techniques
    levels in the water column over weeks or months. These techniques were not reviewed for this report. In-situ exposure techniques in use for trace metals in natural waters include diffusion gradient thin-film gels (DGT), hollow fiber permeation liquid membranes (HFPLM), and Donnan membrane technique (DMT) (Sigg et al. 2006). Solid phase microextraction samplers, which consist of glass fiber coated with poly(dimethylsiloxane) in copper casings were moored at coastal sites along southern California for 2-3 months at a time to measure p,p'-DDE in seawater (Zeng et al. 2005). Another option are passive samplers called semi-permeable membrane devices (SPMD)21. SPMDs are porous plastic tubes containing a fatty material that mimics fish membrane lipids. As water passes through the membrane material, hydrophobic compounds are retained as they would be in fish fatty tissues. These sampling devices are usually deployed in an aquatic environment for three to four weeks and target hydrophobic contaminants such as organopesticides, PAHs, and PCBs. PISCO maintains a number of instrument moorings around Park islands, which might be utilized for such a project. 12. Utilize NOAA's SAMSAP data to map current patterns of fishing effort outside the MPAs (H). With the help of Sanctuary staff, publically available SAMSAP data should be examined to see how spatial patterns of fishing effort in Park waters have changed since the creation of the MPAs. 13. Prioritize the synthesis of time series data from the Park's monitoring programs to discover the impacts of fishing on Park biota (H). Several years of data from the intertidal and kelp forest monitoring programs, much of which precedes the establishment of the SMRs, have been presented in annual reports (yearly snapshots), but most of the data has not been synthesized (e.g., years compared, trends examined).
    [Show full text]