DOCSLIB.ORG

Employment Data for California Law Enforcement 1991/92

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. EMPLOYMENT DATA FOR CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT 1991/92 - 1992/93 145590 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the p~rson or organization originating It. Points of view or opinions stated in this do.c~ment ~~e those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the offiCial position or pOlicies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this copyrighted material has been granted by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards & Training to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further rep~duction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copyrrght owner . • • EMPLOYMENT DATA FOR 0, CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT 1991/92 - 1992/93 • State of California Department of Justice Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training Information Services Bureau 1601 Alhambra Boulevard Sacramento, CA 95816-7083 @ Copyrighl 1993. California Commission on '. Peace 0fIi= Standards and Training .---------- Commission on Peace OMcer Standards and Training ---------........ • COMMISSIONERS Sherman Block Sheriff ., Chairman Los Angeles County Marcel L. Leduc Sergeant Vice-Chairman San Joaquin Co. Sheriffs Department Colleue Campbell Public Member Jody Hall-Esser Chief Administrative Officer City of Culver City Edward Hunt District Attorney Fresno County Ronald Lowenberg Chief of Police Huntington Beach Daniel E. Lungren Attorney General • Ex-Officio Member Raquel Montenegro Professor of Education C.S.U.LA. Manuel Ortega Chief of Police Placentia Police Dept. Bernard C. Parks Assistant Chief Los Angeles Police Dept. Devallis Rutledge Deputy District Attorney Orange County D. A.'s Office Floyd Tidwell Retired Sheriff San Bernardino County Norman C. Boehm Executive Director Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training • iii • .---------- Commission on Peace Officer Stam!ards and Training ---------~ PREFACE Employment Data for California Law Enforcement is designed as an information resource for individuals seeking employment in California law enforcement and for reference purposes by law enforcement agencies. This document includes information on agency size, staffmg, entry requirements, compensation ranges, and benefits for fiscal years 1991/92 and 1992/93. Sections include agency selection standards and training requirements, employment distribution and data, and agency and basic academy addresses for California law enforcement. Commentary on the Basic Course Waiver Examination is provided for use by out-of-state peace officers, or former California peace officers seeking to return to law enforcement employment after a three-year break in service. Also included is information on P. C. 832 training and requaIification requirements, the minimum standards for employment, the POST certificate program, and peace • officer citizenship requirements. The Commission expresses its special appreciation to all the law enforcement agencies that provided data for this document. We are confident that the information contained herein will be useful to all concerned. NORMAN C. BOEHM Executive Director • v ~-------- Commission on Peace OMcer Standards and Training ---------....... • TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Commissioners ...,............................................. iii Prerace .' .................................... ,................. v Table of Contents . • • . .. vii Law Enrorcement Agencies' Employment Inrormation Abbreviations and Explanations 3 Police Departments 91/92 ............. ............... .... ..... ...... ....... 5 92/93 ..................... ... ............ .. ...... 45 County Sheriffs' Departments 91/92 ............................. , . .. ............. ... 25 92/93 .............. ,. ...... ..................... .... ... 65 California State University & College Campus Police Departments .' 91/92 ........................................... , ..... 29 92/93 ................................................. 69 University of California Campus Police Departments 91/92 ........................ ...... .............. ... 29 92/93 .............. , ...... ...... ......... .. .•.. 69 Community College Campus Police Departments 91/92 . 31 92/93 .............................................. " . 71 Marshals' Departments 91/92 . 33 92/93 . ....... ........ .... ..... ..... ....... .. 73 District Attorneys' Departments 91/92 . 33 92/93 .............................................. " . 73 California State Agencies 91/92 .............. , . ... .. .. ... ... .. 37 92/93 . 77 Other Departments in POST Program 91/92 ................................................. 39 • 92/93 ...................... , .......................... 79 vii ".---------- Commission on Peace OMcer Standards and Training ---------_ TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) • Employment Data Statistics Distribution of Personnel by Agency Type . • . 85 California Police and Sheriffs' Departments - Number of Personnel (Sworn & Non-Sworn) 87 Agency Peace Officer Personnel by County • . 91 Employment, Waiver, and Certificate Information Minimum Standards For Employment . • . 99 Immigration and Peace Officer Citizenship Requirements ...........•... 101 Waiver of Attendance . • . 103 POST Certificate Program .......•.............................. 105 California Law Enforcement Agency Addresses California Police Departments .................................. 109 California Sheriffs' Departments . , . •. 121 • California State University & College Campus Police Departments .......•.................................. 125 University of California Police Departments ........................ 127 Community College Police Departments ........................... 129 Marshals' Departments ............•............................ 131 District Attorneys' Departments ................................. 133 California State Agencies .............•......................... 135 Other Departments in POST Program ............................ 137 Basic Academy Addresses Basic Academies ........•.................................... 141 • viii • __------ Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training -------. I • Law Enforcement Agencies' Employment Information 1991/92 • • .,._--------- Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training ---------__ • ABBREVIATIONS AND EXPLANATIONS The following abbreviations were used to simplify the listings in this document: AA/AS Associate of Arts or Associate of Science Degree BA/RS Bachelor of Arts or Bachelor of Science Degree The abbreviations of AA or BA in the "Education" column may be interchangeable with AS or BS, respectively. GED General Education Development Test HS High School Q Quarter Units s Semester Units X Afflrmative Ex,planations: Agency requirements may change at any time. Therefore, questions relevant to personnel practices should be directed to the agency. Cities which contract with other agencies for law enforcement services are not included in this document. The flgures in the "Salary" column do not include incentives . • 3 • EMPLOYMENT DATA FOR CALIFORNIA• LAW ENFORCEMENT • 1991/92 AUTHORIZED RESERVE ENTRY REQ. FOR PEACE Or-FICERS LATERAL =, X~B¥~~ EDUCA- ENTRY SALARY EXTRA PAY ENTRY FULL-TIME PERSONNE. PEACE OFFICERS AGE 201 TION MONTHLY INCENTIVE RETIREMENT ACCEPTED "C~C'l ~ 2 _"0 ~ ~.= m ~ E ~f'- 5- ~.~ .! en - >- "0 c: ,::i: .~m - "- .c. ..... .... b- Q.I en Q;:; ~I..o 0.... g 1: <u g ~ 5 ~ ro ~ ~~ .c.l ~ ~ ~ E 0 ro .~ "- 8 2 0 ... 0.. ~ Non- 0 I...c ..c._ .0 - J- 0 0> QJ. U) - ro (f) CD >--- Peace Peace evel level Level Level ~~ Un- Minimum -t'(Q §: ~ ~ -5 g -E ffi .~ ~ « :5 c 15 AGENCY NAME Officersbfficer TOTAL I I II III « c. Min. MaxJ:orr. Carr. Required a.!:: Z a a. Min. Max. a. w ...J 0 a. U a. 0 0 Yes No 0 0 POll CE DEPARTMENTS I ADELANTO PO 19 11 30 0 15 1 0 21 020 HS 05 18 1938 1938 J( X ALAMEDA PO 100 48 148 0 0 0 0 18 200 030 HS/GEO 12 24 3308 3829 X X X X X ALBANY PO 29 4 33 0 15 3 0 21 40 040 040 HS 08 12 28G9 3365 X X X X X ALHAMBRA PO 95 69 164 19 0 11 0 21 020 HS/GED 17 12 2702 3284 X X X X X X ALTURAS PO 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 21 020 HS/GED X 12 1710 1992 X X X X X X ANAHEIM PO 350 178 528 0 39 0 0 X 21 OBO 020 HS/GEO 15 12 2597 3514 X X X X X X ANDERSON PO 15 9 24 0 0 0 0 X 18 040 020 HS X 08 12 2114 2570 X X X X X X)( ANGELS, CITY OF 8 1 9 0 1 0 0 21 020 HS X 08 12 1804 2050 X X X X X ANTIOCH PO 83 35 119 0 4 15 0 21 040 020 HS/GED 12 18 3015 3555 X X X X K X I ARCADIA PD 77 17 94 0 25 7 0 21 070 030 HS/GED 12 18 2749 3511 X X X X X X ~ ARCATA PD 20 8 28 0 1 3 0 21 020 HS/GED 15 18 2051 2494 X X X X X X ARROYOGRANDEPD 20 9 29 4 4 0 0 X 21 02030S X 15 12 2191 2563 X X X X X X X ARVIN PD 11 0 11 1 1 7 0 X 21 35 200 020 HS/GED X 05 12 1582 2019 X. X X X ATASCADERO PD 28 10 38 0 0 12 0 21 020 HS/GED X 10 18 2330 2830 X X X X ATHERTON PO 19 5 24 0 10 0 1 X 21 100 020 30S 05 18 2815 3490 X X X X X , ATHATER PO 21 8 29 1 4 5 a X 18 020 100 HS 20 12 1355 2358 X X X X AUBURN PO 20 9 29 0 4 2 1 X 18 100 020 AA50S X 14 12 2154 2530 X X X X X X AZUSA PO 58 25 83 0 13 0 0 X 21 070 020 15S 15 12 2896 3520 X X )( X X X BAKERSFIELD PO 242 91 333 0 11 31 5 20 100 020 HS/GEO 15 12 2719 3312 X X X X BALDHIN PARK PO 69 20 89 0 6 0 0 X 21 100 020 HS/GED 12 18 2885 3508 X X X X X X BANNING PD 31 15 45 0 0 0 0 X 21 GED 15 12 2435 2961 X X X X BARSTOH PO 35 15 51 0 3 11 0 21 070 020 HS 14 12 2553 3189 X X X X X X BEAR VALLEY PO 6 8 14 0 0 0 0 21 070 020 HS X 12 2080 2832 X X X X X BEAUMONT PO 15 7 23 1 5 0 1 X 21 70 020 020 HS/GED X 13 18 2350 3001 X X X X X X BelL GARfiEHS PD 51 20 71 0 0 0 15 21 020 023 HS/GED 15 12 3072 3734 X X X X X " X BelL PD 38 19 57 0 12 1 0 21 040 020 HS/GEO 10 12 2551 3150 X X X X X X BelMONT PD 32 10 42 0 5 2 0 21 010 030 305 16 12 2884 3645 X X X X BELVEDERE PD 7 2 9 0 0 0 0 21 020 030 HS X 05 18 2747 3333 X X X X X X X BENICIA PO 33 15 48 0 5 1 0 21 030 HS/GED X 12 12 2751 3344 X X • X X BERKELEY PD 182 135 317 0 40 17 0 X 21 100 030 60S 15 24 3135 3459 X X X X X .
Recommended publications
  • Attachment Council Agenda Bill I

    Attachment Council Agenda Bill I

    Item: NB #5 City of Arlington Attachment Council Agenda Bill I COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Community Policing, Policy and Accountability ATTACHMENTS: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Presentation, Org Chart, IAPRO, BlueTeam, 2018 Strategic Planning, APD Planning Recommendations Police; Jonathan Ventura, Chief and Human Resources; James Trefry, Administrative Services Director EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: 0 LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Presentation by the Chief of Police and the Administrative Services Director regarding the Arlington Police Department. Topics covered include community policing, policy and accountability. HISTORY: The Mayor and Councilmembers have requested a presentation about the current state of the police department in light of current events and feedback received from the community. ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for further information. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Information only; no action required. Arlington Police Department COMMUNITY POLICING / POLICY / ACCOUNTABILITY Community Policing Community Outreach Team / LE Embedded Social Worker (LEESW) (2018) Domestic Violence Coordinator (2019) School Resource Officer All-In Program / Conversations with Cops COP’s Building Trust Grant – Funding for 2 Officers (2015) Boards and Commissions Community Meetings 21st Century Policing Initiative Strategic Plan (2018) Virtual Training Simulator (2019) Crime Data (2019) Traffic Enforcement up 32% DUI Enforcement up 14% Burglary reports down 15% Robbery reports down 38% Overall Theft Reporting
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2016 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County District Attorney's Office Local $10,996 $0 $10,996 Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Task Force $0 $84,324 $84,324 Alameda County Sheriff's Office Local $11,152 $0 $11,152 Alhambra Police Department Local $351,211 $0 $351,211 Anaheim Police Department Local $1,524,643 $0 $1,524,643 Arcadia Police Department Local $0 $51 $51 Azusa Police Department Local $519,313 $0 $519,313 Bakersfield Police Department Local $24,010 $9,236 $33,246 Bell Gardens Police Department Local $828,834 $0 $828,834 Butte County District Attorney Local $23,843 $41,259 $65,102 Butte County Sheriff's Office Local $146,314 $141,022 $287,336 Butte Interagency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $20,589 $80,066 $100,655 California Department Of Corrections And Rehabilitation State $80,402 $67,244 $147,646 California Department Of Justice (DOJ) - Division Of Law Enforcement State $156,871 $16,227 $173,098 Chula Vista Police Department Local $112,258 $2,000 $114,258 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $3,143 $7,895 $11,038 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $134,442 $1,764 $136,206 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $527,882 $17,540 $545,422 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $26,539 $0 $26,539 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $48,291 $2,000 $50,291 City Of Chino Police Department Local $149,103 $1,725 $150,828 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $48,291
  • POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines

    POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines

    K-9 Teams Detection Training Services C20K0001 Attachment - 2 POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines Produced by POST Training Program Services Bureau Foreword by Robert A. Stresak POST Executive Director POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines ©2014 by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training Published January 2014 All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical or by any information retrieval system now known or hereafter invented, without prior written permission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, with the following exception: California law enforcement agencies in the POST peace officer program and POST-certified training presenters are hereby given permission by POST to reproduce any or all of the contents of this manual for their internal use. All other individuals, private businesses and corporations, public and private agencies and colleges, professional associations, and non-POST law enforcement agencies in state or out-of-state may print or download this information for their personal use only. Infringement of the copyright protection law and the provisions expressed here and on the POST website under Copyright/Trademark Protection will be pursued in a court of law. Questions about copyright protection of this publication and exceptions may be directed to Publications Manager. All photos used with permission. Special thanks to Chief David M. Brown, Hemet Police Department. POST2014TPS-0414 POST Mission Statement The mission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training is to continually enhance the professionalism of California law enforcement in serving its communities.
  • CONTACTS for LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE CONTACT INFORMATION for POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Arizona Luke AFB 7383 N. Litchfield R

    CONTACTS for LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE CONTACT INFORMATION for POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Arizona Luke AFB 7383 N. Litchfield R

    CONTACTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Arizona Luke AFB City of Sunrise Police Department Luke AFB 14250 W. Statler Plaza #103 7383 N. Litchfield Road Surprise, AZ Luke AFB, AZ 85309 Ph: 623-222-4000 Arkansas Fayetteville Fayetteville Police Department 100 W Rock St Ste A Fayetteville Fayetteville, AR 72701 688 E Millsap Rd Ste 200 Ph: 479-718-7600 Fayetteville, AR 72703-3929 Fort Smith Fort Smith Police Department Fort Smith 100 S 10th St 801 Carnall Ave Ste 200 Fort Smith, AR 72901 Fort Smith, AR 72901-3758 Ph: 479-785-4221 Little Rock Little Rock Little Rock Police Department 200 W Capitol Ave Ste 1500 700 W Markham St Little Rock, AR 72201-3611 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ph: 501-371-4621 California Edwards AFB California City Police Department Edwards AFB 21130 Hacienda Blvd. 140 Methusa Ave. California, City CA 93505 Edwards AFB, CA 93524 Ph: 760-373-8606 Irvine Irvine 32 Discovery Ste 250 Irvine Police Department Irvine, CA 92618-3157 1 Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92606 Los Angeles AFB, CA Ph: 949-724-7000 483 N. Aviation Blvd Bldg. 272 Los Angeles AFB, CA Los Angeles AFB, CA 90245 Los Angeles Police Department 100 W. 1st St. San Diego Los Angeles, CA 90012 6333 Greenwich Dr Ph: 213-486-1000 Ste 240 San Diego, CA 92122-5900 San Diego San Diego Police Department 9225 Aero Dr. San Diego, CA 92123 Ph: 895-495-7900 Colorado Colorado Springs Colorado Springs Police Department Colorado Springs 7850 Goddard St 5475 Tech Center Dr Ste 110 Colorado Springs, CO 80920-3981 Colorado Springs, CO 80919-2336 Ph: 719-444-3140 STATE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Greenwood Village Greenwood Village Greenwood Village Police Dept.
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2017 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County District Attorney's Office Local $0 $2,772 $2,772 Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Task Force $0 $13,204 $13,204 Anaheim Police Department Local $8,873 $0 $8,873 Arcadia Police Department Local $3,155 $0 $3,155 Azusa Police Department Local $542,045 $0 $542,045 Bakersfield Police Department Local $16,102 $0 $16,102 Bell Gardens Police Department Local $10,739 $0 $10,739 Berkeley Police Department Local $1,460 $59,541 $61,001 Burbank - Glendale - Pasadena Airport Authority Police Local $0 $488 $488 Butte Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $300 $0 $300 Calexico Police Department Local $11,279 $0 $11,279 Chula Vista Police Department Local $86,150 $5,624 $91,774 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $21,444 $0 $21,444 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $123,681 $419 $124,100 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $199,036 $578 $199,614 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $18,115 $0 $18,115 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $24,524 $859 $25,383 City Of Chino Police Department Local $250,475 $9,667 $260,142 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $24,524 $859 $25,383 City Of Fresno Police Department Local $16,128 $10,935 $27,063 City Of Hawthorne Police Department Local $879,841 $4,765 $884,606 City Of Huntington Beach Police Department Local $9,031 $0 $9,031 City Of Murrieta Police Department Local $133,131 $0 $133,131
  • In Tribute to the Police Officers of San Francisco Who Gave Their Lives in the Line of Duty

    In Tribute to the Police Officers of San Francisco Who Gave Their Lives in the Line of Duty

    May 9-15 is National Police Week Remember All Officers Killed In The Line Of Duty Member of COPS California Organization of Police & Sheriffs SAN FRANCISCO POLICE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION To Promote the Ideals, Policies and Accomplishments of the Association and its Members VOLUME 31 SAN FRANCISCO, MAY 1999 NUMBER 5 In Tribute To The Police Officers Of San Francisco Who Gave Their Lives In The Line Of Duty JOHN COOTS 1878 JOHN NICHOLSON 1884 EDGAR OSGOOD 1886 ALEXANDER GRANT 1891 Days of Natiorgaip, Remembrance Give Us Pause WILLIAM BURKE 1898 EUGENE ROBINSON 1903 S aa.. UI UI the '1c t.GQ: . -- pnint the nation is honoring all ;Cv enforcement during MAX FENNER 1906 1 I ustmeaningful May U National A. WILLIAM H. HEINS 1906 - .,date .. -- -... ..--- ........................•.-- . iiSVtsignificance JAMES S. COOK 1906 and - 12 - . iis montli. each of us, marking our consciousne ss anid our i' c's. GEORGE O'CONNELL 1906 HARRYL. SAUER 1907 EDWARD T. MCCARTNEY 1907 BENJAMIN G. ROOT 1926 JOSEPH E. LACEY 1956 WILLIAM C!UGdJjE:S' 1908 JOHN J. DRISCOLL 1927 ROBERT J. MOREY 1958 ANTONE NELTu.1.: 1909 FREDERICK NUTTMAN 1927 BARRY R. ROSEKIND 1958 1958 CHARLES P CASTOR 1911 FREDERICK N. SPOONCER 1928 WILLIAM C. LONG THOMAS FINN.. 1911 .3 :.HN MALCOLM 1930 JAMES MANCUSI, JR. 1965 1967 JOHN J. NOLi. HARL? : ERSON 1930 HERMAN L. GEORGE CHARLES H. BATES CHARLES W. KING 1931 PETER MCELLIGOTT 1968 1969 BYRON C. WOOD ELMER C. )NEY 1931 RENE G. LACAU EDWARD MALONEY 1915 ':TtL3 4.. MANNING 1932 JOSEPH BRODNICK 1969 PETER I1A1M4iND 1915 EARDON 1932 ERIC A.
  • In the Line of Duty Magazine

    In the Line of Duty Magazine

    In The Line Of Duty 2016 California Peace Officers’ Memorial Ceremony Memorial Magazine Volume 22 THEY STAND TALL AND CAst A LONG SHADOW hey stand tall. At about nine feet, they cast a long shadow. They have to. For the three bronze figures Trepresent more than 1,500 peace officers who have died in the line of duty since California became a state. Vic Riesau, who retired in 1977 as a Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Division Chief after a 25 year career, started a new career as an artist and sculptor. His bronze figures depict a county sheriff of the 1880s, a state traffic officer of the 1930s, and a city patrol officer of the 1980s. The three look down on a life-size bronze figure of a woman comforting a child sitting on a bench, representing the grief-torn families they left behind. “We pledge our best efforts to stand behind the men and women who stand behind the badge,” said Governor George Deukmejian in dedicating the memorial. “The job of a peace officer is perhaps the most difficult and challenging one of all in our society. We are very thankful to those willing to risk injury even death in order to provide greater protection and safety for all of us.” “While it can surely be said that these men and women who have placed their lives on the line for the safety of their fellow man are heroes, we must recognize that simply donning the uniform of a peace officer has in itself become an act of courage,” said dedication speaker David Snowden, Chief of the Costa Mesa This publication was Police Department.
  • Law Enforcement Code of Ethics

    Law Enforcement Code of Ethics

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. ',' • BASIC COURSE INSTRUCTOR UNIT GUIDE (___ 1_) ( ______H_IS_T_O_R_Y_,_P_R_O_FE_S_S_IO_N_A_L_IS_M __ A_N~D_E_T_H_IC_S ______ ~ " ( February 1995 ) 155771 U.s. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has bee,n, reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization orlglnat!ng it. Points of view or opinions stated in • this d~cumen~ ?re thos~ of the authors and do not Ilecessarily represent the official positron or policies of the National Institute of Justice, Permission to reproduce this copyrighted materia 'las been graJl1ed. tw . , ca~fornia Oornrnission on Peace OffJ.cer standards and Training to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reprodu-:.tion outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the copYright owner. THE COMMiSS90~ • ON P~AC~ OFfiCER ~rfAN~ARD$ ANO l'RAINYNG • The curricula contained in this document is designed as a guideline for the delivery of performance-based law enforcement training. It is part of the POST Basic Course guidelines system developed by California law enforcement trainers and criminal • justice educators in cooperation with the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training. • • II UNIT GUIDE 1 II TABLE OF CONTENTS Learning Domain 1 History, Professionalism, & Ethics Curriculum Page I. Historical Evolution of Law Enforcement 1 II. Characteristics of a Profession ............................... 11 III. Defining Values, Principles, Ethics, and Moral Standards as They Relate t,o Law Enforcement ........................... 13 IV. Community Expectat:0ns Regarding the Lawful and Ethical Behavior of Peace Officers .... 15 V. Benefits of Professional and Ethical Behavior .................... 19 VI.
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2019

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2019

    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2019 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County Sheriff's Office Local $122,904 $0 $122,904 Alhambra Police Department Local $150,840 $0 $150,840 Anaheim Police Department Local $1,463,106 $0 $1,463,106 Antioch Police Department Local $28,318 $0 $28,318 Azusa Police Department Local $605,307 $0 $605,307 Banning Police Department Local $0 $12,555 $12,555 Buena Park Police Department Local $20,983 $0 $20,983 Butte Interagency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $0 $7,254 $7,254 California State University Fullerton Police Department Local $21,446 $0 $21,446 Chula Vista Police Department Local $247,848 $16,953 $264,801 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $24,966 $0 $24,966 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $325,015 $10,938 $335,953 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $46,694 $554 $47,248 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $10,363 $0 $10,363 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $14,923 $16,953 $31,876 City Of Chino Police Department Local $105,165 $0 $105,165 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $14,404 $16,953 $31,357 City Of Costa Mesa Police Department Local $4,799 $9,769 $14,568 City Of Fresno Police Department Local $75,910 $7,691 $83,601 City Of Hawthorne Police Department Local $705,656 $2,681 $708,337 City Of Huntington Beach Police Department Local $29,134 $0 $29,134 City Of Monterey Park Police Department Local $9,360 $0 $9,360 City Of Murrieta Police Department
  • Agency Data Sharing Report

    Agency Data Sharing Report

    Agency Data Sharing Report Detections Shared The Long Beach Police Department Agency is Sharing its Detection data with the following Agencies: 100th Judicial District Attorney Traffic Enforcement 10th Judicial District Drug Task Force 17th Judicial Circuit Drug Task Force 21st Drug Task Force 24th Judicial District Drug Task Force 2nd Judicial District Attorneys Office (NM) 32nd Judicial District Attorney Office Abbeville Police Department ACJIC (api) Acworth Police Department Adams County Sheriffs Office (MS) Addison Police Department Addison Police Department (TX) Adel Police Department Adrian Police Department Alachua County Sheriff Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Alameda Police Department ALEA Allen Police Department Alpharetta Police Department (GA) American Canyon Police Department Anaheim Police Department Annapolis Police Department (MD) Antioch Police Department CA Aragon Police Department Arcade Police Department Arcadia Police Department Arizona Department of Public Safety Arnold Police Department ATF National Account Athens-Clarke Police Department Auburn Police Department CA Austin Police Department Avondale Estates Police Department Bakersfield Police Department Baldwin County Sheriffs Office Ball Ground Police Department Banks County Sheriffs Office Bartlett Police Department Bartow County Sheriffs Office Bastrop County Sheriff (TX) Bay Area Rapid Transit Police (CA) Beachwood Police Beaumont Police Department Bell Gardens Police Department Bell Police Department Belton Police Department MO Date Created: 08-25-20 LEARN
  • I Ilj.J L~ 11 1'1==

    I Ilj.J L~ 11 1'1==

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. PEACE OFFICERS KILLED .-\'\D A'SS \lL TEP 1,\ CALlFOR,\l·\. 1Q-4 Tn,s F1:rc~ che 1HS proouceo from documents received for l !1: w s :nr the ~CJRS data base S:nce ~CJRS cannot exerCise ~C~:;G: cve' t~e ~f1ys!ca: condition of the documents submitted. ~I'e nC ?C .. 3i I raffle Qdil;Y \~:il vary The resolution chart on f·=I~·"~~·· ~===~r I Ilj.j_l~ 11 1'1== li==.-- , 125 , ..... ~IC;Cl;'TI!rg p:o:edures :.;sed to create thiS fiche comply \~lth tne stardardS set fOith in 41CFR 10111504 POifitS of ~jet:1 or 0pifHons stated In thiS document are those of the author s and do liot represent the officIal posltlon Of policIes of the U.S Department of Justice. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFERENCE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20531 Rf-. CE1Vfn I \n! I 0\ I. 0'\ II '\ I" JUL i L ? ,- 1-' U • '" .J{ I n I u SAN fRANCIi'lvv REGION . I.fAA DEPAKTMEHT OF JUSTiCe StatL' of ('alilllmia Df~PART}.!rXr 01; .nrSTICI' I'\'l·LLI·.I. YOl':\(;I'R. :\ttnrt1,'Y C;\.'l1l'ral f' CHARIXS A. IL\RHYI T. Chk'!' Ikput~ Attnnh.'Y (IL'll,'ral . .' l' , IDFNTIFICATI():\ A~D !,\;FOR\lATION BRANCH SETH TIIOi\!AS . \~"istdl1t DiI'l'dur W. II. lIutdlills. ('ilk!' ,'I, \ PFACF OFl-'lCFRS Kl It.LI) AND ASSA l'LIT)) '. IN CALIFORNIA. Ill"'...). i " Charks K. Bridg\.'~ Quinton J.
  • Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America

    Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse.