DOCSLIB.ORG

Applicant Rankings by State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applicant Rankings by State Applicant Rankings by State *For additional information on the creation of these indices please see www.cops.usdoj.gov/Default.asp?Item=2208 **Note that this list contains 7,202 agencies. There were 58 agencies that were found to be ineligible for funding and 12 that withdrew after submitting applications, for a total of 7,272 applications received. Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile Akiachak Native Community Police AK AK002ZZ Department 31.20 36.75 67.95 99.9% 91.6% 99.9% AK AK085ZZ Tuluksak Native Community 21.18 39.44 60.62 98.5% 95.6% 99.2% AK AK038ZZ Akiak Native Community 18.85 38.40 57.25 96.7% 94.5% 98.0% AK AK033ZZ Manokotak, Village of 20.66 35.68 56.35 98.3% 89.4% 97.5% AK AK065ZZ Anvik Tribal Council 20.53 34.91 55.44 98.2% 87.6% 97.0% AK AK090ZZ Native Village of Kotlik 11.10 43.90 54.99 52.1% 98.9% 96.6% AK AK062ZZ Atmautluak Traditional Council 21.26 33.06 54.31 98.6% 82.7% 96.0% AK AK008ZZ Kwethluk, Organized Village of 25.85 25.97 51.82 99.7% 56.9% 93.8% AK AK057ZZ Gambell Police Department 20.37 30.93 51.30 98.1% 76.2% 93.0% AK AK095ZZ Alakanuk Tribal Council 22.18 26.44 48.61 99.0% 58.8% 89.4% AK AK00109 Sitka, City and Borough of 10.48 37.16 47.64 44.1% 92.3% 87.5% AK AK00102 Fairbank Department of Public Safety 11.64 35.25 46.89 58.8% 88.5% 85.8% AK AK00115 Yakutat Department of Public Safety 8.16 38.39 46.56 15.2% 94.5% 85.1% AK AK00101 Anchorage Police Department 13.52 31.27 44.79 77.3% 77.2% 80.7% AK AK00107 Petersburg Police Department 9.70 32.48 42.18 32.8% 81.3% 73.4% AK AK123ZZ Native Village of Napakiak 14.49 25.32 39.81 84.1% 54.2% 66.1% AK AK119ZZ City of Mekoryuk 12.65 26.94 39.59 69.7% 61.0% 65.4% Klawock Department of Public AK AK00135 Safety/Police Dept. 7.57 30.92 38.49 10.4% 76.1% 61.4% AK AK00120 Soldotna Police Department 7.99 27.99 35.99 13.7% 65.5% 52.3% AK AK00156 Wasilla Police Department 7.61 25.38 32.99 10.6% 54.5% 40.6% AK AK023ZZ Scammon Bay Traditional Council 18.35 12.69 31.03 96.2% 6.4% 33.0% AK AKASP00 Alaska State Police 7.39 22.55 29.94 9.1% 41.7% 28.8% AK AK061ZZ Holy Cross Tribal Council 11.75 10.36 22.11 59.9% 2.4% 5.8% AK AK00132 North Pole Police Department 9.23 11.73 20.96 26.9% 4.4% 3.9% AL AL02701 Selma, City of 17.78 47.90 65.68 95.3% 99.8% 99.8% AL AL01101 Anniston Police Department 12.62 49.18 61.80 69.5% 99.9% 99.5% AL AL00101 Bessemer Police Department 13.49 48.08 61.58 77.1% 99.9% 99.4% AL AL00202 Prichard, City of 20.23 39.44 59.68 98.0% 95.6% 99.0% Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile AL AL01204 Valley, City of 16.47 41.67 58.13 92.4% 97.7% 98.4% AL AL00203 Chickasaw, City of 14.44 42.98 57.43 83.8% 98.5% 98.1% AL AL04101 Florence Police Department 12.82 44.39 57.20 71.4% 99.0% 98.0% AL AL003ZZ North Courtland, Town of 21.39 35.79 57.18 98.6% 89.7% 98.0% AL AL00201 Mobile Police Department 17.59 39.17 56.77 95.0% 95.4% 97.7% AL AL04601 Tuskegee, City of 14.64 41.82 56.45 85.1% 97.7% 97.6% AL AL01202 Lanett Police Department 14.21 42.17 56.38 82.2% 98.0% 97.5% AL AL04701 Huntsville Police Department 10.72 45.28 56.00 47.2% 99.3% 97.2% AL AL03101 Attalla, City of 14.13 41.77 55.89 81.7% 97.7% 97.2% AL AL00206 Bayou La Batre Police Department 15.40 40.09 55.49 89.0% 96.3% 97.0% AL AL01002 Georgiana Police Department 17.95 37.16 55.10 95.6% 92.3% 96.7% AL AL00509 Summerdale Police Department 12.11 42.12 54.23 64.4% 98.0% 96.0% AL AL00503 Foley Police Department 12.06 42.11 54.17 63.8% 98.0% 95.9% AL AL00205 Saraland Police Department 16.79 36.75 53.54 93.4% 91.6% 95.4% AL AL00107 Midfield, Police Dept. 13.26 39.29 52.55 75.4% 95.5% 94.6% AL AL00108 Tarrant Police Department 11.69 40.57 52.26 59.2% 96.7% 94.3% AL AL03601 Greensboro Police Department 11.58 40.61 52.19 57.9% 96.7% 94.2% AL AL00301 Montgomery Police Department 16.57 35.18 51.75 92.7% 88.4% 93.6% AL AL01505 Toxey, Town of 15.88 35.58 51.45 90.7% 89.2% 93.2% AL AL02502 Hanceville Police Department 16.92 34.50 51.42 93.7% 86.6% 93.2% Green County Board of AL AL03500 Commissioners 14.56 36.82 51.38 84.6% 91.8% 93.1% AL AL02403 Dozier, Town of 19.76 31.48 51.24 97.7% 78.0% 92.9% AL AL05701 Phenix City Police Department 10.25 40.74 50.99 40.7% 96.9% 92.7% AL AL05302 Uniontown, City of 20.23 30.26 50.48 98.0% 73.8% 92.1% AL AL06301 Tuscaloosa, City of 10.77 39.69 50.46 48.0% 95.9% 92.0% AL AL04502 Hayneville, Town of 21.24 29.16 50.39 98.5% 69.8% 92.0% AL AL06501 McIntosh Police Department 6.30 43.87 50.17 3.7% 98.8% 91.7% AL AL06702 Haleyville Police Department 15.16 34.77 49.94 87.9% 87.4% 91.3% AL AL00208 Mt. Vernon Police Department 10.65 38.84 49.49 46.4% 94.9% 90.7% AL AL01201 Lafayette Police Department 13.02 36.20 49.22 73.3% 90.6% 90.3% AL AL05901 Calera Police Department 11.56 37.64 49.20 57.6% 93.4% 90.3% AL AL05201 Decatur, City of 14.70 34.50 49.19 85.4% 86.5% 90.3% AL AL06102 Talladega Police Department 8.59 40.56 49.15 19.7% 96.6% 90.2% AL AL04801 Demopolis Police Department 11.76 37.33 49.09 60.1% 92.6% 90.1% AL AL06302 Northport Police Department 13.70 35.32 49.02 78.7% 88.7% 90.0% Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile AL AL00501 Bay Minette Police Department 12.19 36.29 48.49 65.3% 90.7% 89.1% AL AL087ZZ Town of Beatrice Police Department 16.10 32.20 48.31 91.3% 80.4% 88.8% AL AL05003 Arab Police Department 12.24 36.05 48.29 65.7% 90.3% 88.8% AL AL02606 Midland, City of 12.99 35.29 48.28 73.0% 88.6% 88.7% AL AL04600 Macon County Sheriff's Department 11.65 36.33 47.99 58.9% 90.8% 88.2% AL AL06201 Alexander City Police Department 10.02 37.96 47.98 37.2% 93.8% 88.2% AL AL04301 Auburn Police Department 11.52 35.95 47.47 57.2% 90.1% 87.2% AL AL01001 Greenville Police Department 16.26 30.93 47.19 91.8% 76.1% 86.5% AL AL02901 Wetumpka, City of 10.34 36.63 46.97 42.0% 91.3% 85.9% AL AL05801 Pell City 10.81 36.04 46.85 48.6% 90.3% 85.7% AL AL00122 Adamsville Police Department 13.13 32.83 45.95 74.4% 82.3% 83.6% AL AL06701 Double Springs 14.47 31.35 45.82 84.0% 77.6% 83.2% AL AL06104 Lincoln Police Department 13.31 32.37 45.67 75.7% 80.9% 82.8% AL AL05905 Vincent Police Department 10.15 35.28 45.43 39.1% 88.6% 82.3% AL AL02001 Sheffield Police Department 11.17 34.14 45.30 52.8% 85.8% 82.1% Tuscaloosa County Sheriff's AL AL06300 Department 12.48 32.83 45.30 68.0% 82.3% 82.0% AL ALAST03 Alabama Department of Public Safety 16.45 28.76 45.20 92.4% 68.4% 81.7% AL AL06101 Sylacauga Police Department 15.24 29.67 44.92 88.2% 71.9% 81.0% AL AL01401 Clanton, City of 12.33 32.50 44.82 66.4% 81.3% 80.8% AL AL06600 Wilcox County Sheriff's Office 20.04 24.33 44.37 97.8% 49.8% 79.8% AL AL00604 Louisville Police Department 15.32 28.87 44.19 88.6% 68.8% 79.4% AL AL03501 Eutaw, City of 14.36 29.80 44.16 83.2% 72.4% 79.3% AL AL05601 Roanoke Police Department 16.33 27.82 44.15 92.0% 64.6% 79.3% AL AL03801 Dothan, City of 10.44 33.36 43.80 43.6% 83.6% 78.1% AL AL04103 Anderson Police Department 13.82 29.94 43.77 79.5% 72.8% 78.0% AL AL05501 Troy Police Department 10.92 32.71 43.63 50.0% 82.0% 77.7% AL AL02303 Florala Police Department 14.74 28.75 43.49 85.7% 68.3% 77.3% AL AL01403 Jemison Police Department 11.70 31.63 43.33 59.4% 78.4% 76.8% AL AL047ZZ Lynn, Town of 11.61 31.63 43.23 58.4% 78.4% 76.6% AL AL01302 Cedar Bluff Police Department 9.67 33.55 43.22 32.4% 84.2% 76.6% AL AL05700 Russell County Sheriff's Department 11.09 32.08 43.17 51.9% 80.0% 76.4% AL AL03201 Fayette Police Department 11.58 31.54 43.12 57.9% 78.1% 76.2% AL AL01601 Jackson, City of 11.87 31.23 43.10 61.6% 77.1% 76.1% AL AL05812 Argo, City of 17.41 25.36 42.77 94.6% 54.3% 75.1% AL AL04606 SHORTER POLICE DEPARTMENT 9.32 33.41 42.73 28.1% 83.8% 75.0% Crime and Crime and Fiscal Need Community Final Index: Community Index: 0-50 Policing Index: 0- 0-100 Fiscal Need Policing Possible 50 Possible Possible Index Index Final Index State ORI Agency Name Points Points Points Percentile Percentile Percentile AL AL01903 New Brockton, Town of 26.75 15.90 42.64 99.7% 15.6% 74.8% AL AL04703 Gurley Police Department 10.65 31.89 42.54 46.4% 79.2% 74.4% AL AL03004 Flomaton Police Department 14.49 28.03 42.53 84.2% 65.6% 74.4% AL AL05001 Albertville Police Department 11.60 30.78 42.38 58.3% 75.7% 74.1% AL AL04300 Lee County Sheriff's Office 9.66 32.60 42.26 32.2% 81.7% 73.7% AL AL00212 Creola Police Department 11.14 31.05 42.18 52.4% 76.5% 73.5% AL AL02600 Dale County Sheriffs Office 11.21 30.97 42.18 53.4% 76.3% 73.5% AL AL00113 Irondale, City of 14.09 28.06 42.16 81.4% 65.8% 73.4% AL AL05802 Ashville Police Department 6.16 35.92 42.08 3.3% 90.0% 73.0% AL AL023ZZ Douglas, Town of 14.18 27.16 41.35 82.0% 62.1% 71.0% AL AL04505 White Hall, Town of 32.87 8.28 41.15 100.0% 0.5% 70.4% AL AL03003 East Brewton, Police Department 12.99 28.13 41.12 73.0% 66.1% 70.3% AL AL00401 Prattville Police Department 8.63 32.43 41.07 20.2% 81.1% 70.1% AL AL00120 Lipscomb, City of 9.83 31.21 41.03 34.3% 77.0% 70.0% AL AL04401 Athens Police Department 9.99 30.95 40.94 36.8% 76.2% 69.7% AL AL00121 Trussville Police Department 11.21 29.70 40.91
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment Council Agenda Bill I
    Item: NB #5 City of Arlington Attachment Council Agenda Bill I COUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Community Policing, Policy and Accountability ATTACHMENTS: DEPARTMENT OF ORIGIN Presentation, Org Chart, IAPRO, BlueTeam, 2018 Strategic Planning, APD Planning Recommendations Police; Jonathan Ventura, Chief and Human Resources; James Trefry, Administrative Services Director EXPENDITURES REQUESTED: None BUDGET CATEGORY: N/A BUDGETED AMOUNT: 0 LEGAL REVIEW: DESCRIPTION: Presentation by the Chief of Police and the Administrative Services Director regarding the Arlington Police Department. Topics covered include community policing, policy and accountability. HISTORY: The Mayor and Councilmembers have requested a presentation about the current state of the police department in light of current events and feedback received from the community. ALTERNATIVES: Remand to staff for further information. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Information only; no action required. Arlington Police Department COMMUNITY POLICING / POLICY / ACCOUNTABILITY Community Policing Community Outreach Team / LE Embedded Social Worker (LEESW) (2018) Domestic Violence Coordinator (2019) School Resource Officer All-In Program / Conversations with Cops COP’s Building Trust Grant – Funding for 2 Officers (2015) Boards and Commissions Community Meetings 21st Century Policing Initiative Strategic Plan (2018) Virtual Training Simulator (2019) Crime Data (2019) Traffic Enforcement up 32% DUI Enforcement up 14% Burglary reports down 15% Robbery reports down 38% Overall Theft Reporting
    [Show full text]
  • The German Civil Code
    TUE A ERICANI LAW REGISTER FOUNDED 1852. UNIERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPART=ENT OF LAW VOL. {4 0 - S'I DECEMBER, 1902. No. 12. THE GERMAN CIVIL CODE. (Das Biirgerliche Gesetzbuch.) SOURCES-PREPARATION-ADOPTION. The magnitude of an attempt to codify the German civil. laws can be adequately appreciated only by remembering that for more than fifteefn centuries central Europe was the world's arena for startling political changes radically involv- ing territorial boundaries and of necessity affecting private as well as public law. With no thought of presenting new data, but that the reader may properly marshall events for an accurate compre- hension of the irregular development of the law into the modem and concrete results, it is necessary to call attention to some of the political- and social factors which have been potent and conspicuous since the eighth century. Notwithstanding the boast of Charles the Great that he was both master of Europe and the chosen pr6pagandist of Christianity and despite his efforts in urging general accept- ance of the Roman law, which the Latinized Celts of the western and southern parts of his titular domain had orig- THE GERM AN CIVIL CODE. inally been forced to receive and later had willingly retained, upon none of those three points did the facts sustain his van- ity. He was constrained to recognize that beyond the Rhine there were great tribes, anciently nomadic, but for some cen- turies become agricultural when not engaged in their normal and chief occupation, war, who were by no means under his control. His missii or special commissioners to those people were not well received and his laws were not much respected.
    [Show full text]
  • Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment
    Trafford Park Masterplan Baseline Assessment A Report for the Trafford Economic Alliance By EKOS, CBRE, URBED and WSP August 2008 EKOS Consulting (UK) Ltd 2 Mount Street Manchester M2 5WQ TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES............................................................................................ 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY......................................................................................................... 12 2 INTRODUCTION AND STUDY CONTEXT ..................................................................... 23 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 23 STUDY CONTEXT.................................................................................................................... 23 HISTORICAL CONTEXT ............................................................................................................ 24 STUDY CONTEXT AND MASTERPLAN OBJECTIVES .................................................................... 29 STUDY AREA.......................................................................................................................... 31 BASELINE REPORT OBJECTIVES AND STRUCTURE.................................................................... 31 3 REGENERATION AND PLANNING POLICY REVIEW.................................................. 33 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 33 NATIONAL POLICY
    [Show full text]
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California
    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2016 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County District Attorney's Office Local $10,996 $0 $10,996 Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Task Force $0 $84,324 $84,324 Alameda County Sheriff's Office Local $11,152 $0 $11,152 Alhambra Police Department Local $351,211 $0 $351,211 Anaheim Police Department Local $1,524,643 $0 $1,524,643 Arcadia Police Department Local $0 $51 $51 Azusa Police Department Local $519,313 $0 $519,313 Bakersfield Police Department Local $24,010 $9,236 $33,246 Bell Gardens Police Department Local $828,834 $0 $828,834 Butte County District Attorney Local $23,843 $41,259 $65,102 Butte County Sheriff's Office Local $146,314 $141,022 $287,336 Butte Interagency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $20,589 $80,066 $100,655 California Department Of Corrections And Rehabilitation State $80,402 $67,244 $147,646 California Department Of Justice (DOJ) - Division Of Law Enforcement State $156,871 $16,227 $173,098 Chula Vista Police Department Local $112,258 $2,000 $114,258 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $3,143 $7,895 $11,038 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $134,442 $1,764 $136,206 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $527,882 $17,540 $545,422 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $26,539 $0 $26,539 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $48,291 $2,000 $50,291 City Of Chino Police Department Local $149,103 $1,725 $150,828 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $48,291
    [Show full text]
  • North Locality: Life Expectancy
    TRAFFORD NORTH LOCALITY HEALTH PROFILE JANUARY 2021 NORTH LOCALITY: WARDS • Clifford: Small and densely populated ward at north-east tip of the borough. Dense residential area of Victorian terraced housing and a diverse range of housing stock. Clifford has a diverse population with active community groups The area is undergoing significant transformation with the Old Trafford Master Plan. • Gorse Hill: Northern most ward with the third largest area size. Trafford town hall, coronation street studio and Manchester United stadium are located in this ward. Media city development on the Salford side has led to significant development in parts of the ward. Trafford Park and Humphrey Park railway stations serve the ward for commuting to both Manchester and Liverpool. • Longford: Longford is a densely populated urban area in north east of the Borough. It is home to the world famous Lancashire County Cricket Club. Longford Park, one of the Borough's larger parks, has been the finishing point for the annual Stretford Pageant. Longford Athletics stadium can also be found adjacent to the park. • Stretford: Densely populated ward with the M60 and Bridgewater canal running through the ward. The ward itself does not rank particularly highly in terms of deprivation but has pockets of very high deprivation. Source: Trafford Data Lab, 2020 NORTH LOCALITY: DEMOGRAPHICS • The North locality has an estimated population of 48,419 across the four wards (Clifford, Gorse Hill, Stretford & Longford) (ONS, 2019). • Data at the ward level suggests that all 4 wards in the north locality are amongst the wards with lowest percentages of 65+ years population (ONS, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4 Detailed Proposals for Each Ward – Organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP)
    Appendix 4 Detailed proposals for each Ward – organised by Local Area Partnership (LAP) Proposed Wards within the Knutsford Local Area Partnership Knutsford Local Area Partnership (LAP) is situated towards the north-west of Cheshire East, and borders Wilmslow to the north-east, Macclesfield to the south-east and Congleton to the south. The M6 and M56 motorways pass through this LAP. Hourly train services link Knutsford, Plumley and Mobberley to Chester and Manchester, while in the east of this LAP hourly trains link Chelford with Crewe and Manchester. The town of Knutsford was the model for Elizabeth Gaskell's novel Cranford and scenes from the George C. Scott film Patton were filmed in the centre of Knutsford, in front of the old Town Hall. Barclays Bank employs thousands of people in IT and staff support functions at Radbroke Hall, just outside the town of Knutsford. Knutsford is home to numerous sporting teams such as Knutsford Hockey Club, Knutsford Cricket Club, Knutsford Rugby Club and Knutsford Football Club. Attractions include Tatton Park, home of the RHS Flower show, the stately homes Arley Hall, Tabley House and Peover Hall, and the Cuckooland Museum of cuckoo clocks. In detail, the proposals are: Knutsford is a historic, self-contained urban community with established extents and comprises the former County Ward of Knutsford, containing 7 polling districts. The Parish of Knutsford also mirrors the boundary of this proposal. Knutsford Town is surrounded by Green Belt which covers 58% of this proposed division. The proposed ward has excellent communications by road, motorway and rail and is bounded to the north by Tatton Park and to the east by Birkin Brook.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Wynwood BID Annual Report
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 2020 WYNWOOD ANNUAL REPORT | 1 MESSAGE FROM CHAIRMAN Message from Albert Garcia Wynwood BID Chairman The past year has brought unexpected challenges beyond The Wynwood BID also launched creative social media Work to enhance the safety and quality of life in Wynwood anything we have experienced before, with the onset of a campaigns, #WynatHome and #FortheWyn, to promote also yielded positive results. With the strong support of the global pandemic. As difficult as it has been, our Wynwood area businesses during the stay-at-home orders and then BID Board of Directors and the Miami Police Department, community has proven its resiliency. Businesses have incentivize people to come back safely once those orders the BID invested in the installation of nearly 100 security pivoted time and again to respond to the crisis, enhanc- were lifted. Throughout the pandemic, the BID has served cameras throughout the neighborhood. These cameras ing safety measures and providing services in new ways as a source of key information for the area, sharing details have already made a big difference in aiding law enforce- to respond to their customers. The Wynwood Business about new government regulations directly with our area ment, helping officers solve crimes more quickly and Improvement District (BID) has been a proud partner of our property and business owners. efficiently. We were also able to install more than 300 LED area residents, businesses, and property owners through- lights along our streets, providing higher-quality and more The Wynwood BID’s commitment to forward-thinking out this time, working to support our community through cost-efficient lighting in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines
    K-9 Teams Detection Training Services C20K0001 Attachment - 2 POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines Produced by POST Training Program Services Bureau Foreword by Robert A. Stresak POST Executive Director POST Law Enforcement K-9 Guidelines ©2014 by California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training Published January 2014 All rights reserved. This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical or by any information retrieval system now known or hereafter invented, without prior written permission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, with the following exception: California law enforcement agencies in the POST peace officer program and POST-certified training presenters are hereby given permission by POST to reproduce any or all of the contents of this manual for their internal use. All other individuals, private businesses and corporations, public and private agencies and colleges, professional associations, and non-POST law enforcement agencies in state or out-of-state may print or download this information for their personal use only. Infringement of the copyright protection law and the provisions expressed here and on the POST website under Copyright/Trademark Protection will be pursued in a court of law. Questions about copyright protection of this publication and exceptions may be directed to Publications Manager. All photos used with permission. Special thanks to Chief David M. Brown, Hemet Police Department. POST2014TPS-0414 POST Mission Statement The mission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training is to continually enhance the professionalism of California law enforcement in serving its communities.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACTS for LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE CONTACT INFORMATION for POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Arizona Luke AFB 7383 N. Litchfield R
    CONTACTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT STATE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Arizona Luke AFB City of Sunrise Police Department Luke AFB 14250 W. Statler Plaza #103 7383 N. Litchfield Road Surprise, AZ Luke AFB, AZ 85309 Ph: 623-222-4000 Arkansas Fayetteville Fayetteville Police Department 100 W Rock St Ste A Fayetteville Fayetteville, AR 72701 688 E Millsap Rd Ste 200 Ph: 479-718-7600 Fayetteville, AR 72703-3929 Fort Smith Fort Smith Police Department Fort Smith 100 S 10th St 801 Carnall Ave Ste 200 Fort Smith, AR 72901 Fort Smith, AR 72901-3758 Ph: 479-785-4221 Little Rock Little Rock Little Rock Police Department 200 W Capitol Ave Ste 1500 700 W Markham St Little Rock, AR 72201-3611 Little Rock, AR 72201 Ph: 501-371-4621 California Edwards AFB California City Police Department Edwards AFB 21130 Hacienda Blvd. 140 Methusa Ave. California, City CA 93505 Edwards AFB, CA 93524 Ph: 760-373-8606 Irvine Irvine 32 Discovery Ste 250 Irvine Police Department Irvine, CA 92618-3157 1 Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92606 Los Angeles AFB, CA Ph: 949-724-7000 483 N. Aviation Blvd Bldg. 272 Los Angeles AFB, CA Los Angeles AFB, CA 90245 Los Angeles Police Department 100 W. 1st St. San Diego Los Angeles, CA 90012 6333 Greenwich Dr Ph: 213-486-1000 Ste 240 San Diego, CA 92122-5900 San Diego San Diego Police Department 9225 Aero Dr. San Diego, CA 92123 Ph: 895-495-7900 Colorado Colorado Springs Colorado Springs Police Department Colorado Springs 7850 Goddard St 5475 Tech Center Dr Ste 110 Colorado Springs, CO 80920-3981 Colorado Springs, CO 80919-2336 Ph: 719-444-3140 STATE CONTACT INFORMATION FOR POLICE DEPARTMENTS NEAR WEBSTER Greenwood Village Greenwood Village Greenwood Village Police Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale
    Equitable Sharing Payments of Cash and Sale Proceeds by Recipient Agency for California Fiscal Year 2017 Agency Name Agency Type Cash Value Sales Proceeds Totals Alameda County District Attorney's Office Local $0 $2,772 $2,772 Alameda County Narcotics Task Force Task Force $0 $13,204 $13,204 Anaheim Police Department Local $8,873 $0 $8,873 Arcadia Police Department Local $3,155 $0 $3,155 Azusa Police Department Local $542,045 $0 $542,045 Bakersfield Police Department Local $16,102 $0 $16,102 Bell Gardens Police Department Local $10,739 $0 $10,739 Berkeley Police Department Local $1,460 $59,541 $61,001 Burbank - Glendale - Pasadena Airport Authority Police Local $0 $488 $488 Butte Inter-Agency Narcotics Task Force (BINTF) Task Force $300 $0 $300 Calexico Police Department Local $11,279 $0 $11,279 Chula Vista Police Department Local $86,150 $5,624 $91,774 Citrus Heights Police Department Local $21,444 $0 $21,444 City Of Baldwin Park Police Department Local $123,681 $419 $124,100 City Of Beverly Hills Police Department Local $199,036 $578 $199,614 City Of Brawley Police Department Local $18,115 $0 $18,115 City Of Carlsbad Police Department Local $24,524 $859 $25,383 City Of Chino Police Department Local $250,475 $9,667 $260,142 City Of Coronado Police Department Local $24,524 $859 $25,383 City Of Fresno Police Department Local $16,128 $10,935 $27,063 City Of Hawthorne Police Department Local $879,841 $4,765 $884,606 City Of Huntington Beach Police Department Local $9,031 $0 $9,031 City Of Murrieta Police Department Local $133,131 $0 $133,131
    [Show full text]
  • Miami Police Department Independent Reviewer Eighth Report February 2019 - May 2019
    Miami Police Department Independent Reviewer Eighth Report February 2019 - May 2019 1 Table of Contents Introduction ……………………………………………………….. 1 Compliance Ratings ………………………………………………. 2 Work Completed During Evaluation Period ……………………… 4 Agreement Progress ………………………………………………. 6 Conclusion ………………………………………………………… 14 IAS Assessment Response………………………………………… 15 Implicit Bias Lesson Plan………………………………………..... 21 Introduction This is the eighth assessment report, covering four months of activity, completed as a component of the Agreement entered into by the Department of Justice and the City of Miami in April of 2016. The Agreement is the result of a request, by the Miami Police Department (MPD) and others, to have the Department of Justice review a series of police shootings that occurred between the years of 2008 and 2011. Not only were the uses of force examined, the associated investigations and relationships with the community were considered as well. The investigation resulted in the Agreement referenced above that mandates the MPD to satisfy clear and measurable requirements in a number of delineated areas within the organization and out in the community. While the obligations are clear, the Miami Police Department retained the flexibility to design, develop, and implement solutions appropriate for the community it serves. The MPD took advantage of the time span between investigation and finalizing the Agreement to implement a number of changes that would begin to satisfy some of the requirements. The overarching goal of this Agreement is to ensure “that police services continue to be delivered to the people of the city in a manner that fully complies with the Constitution and laws of the United States, effectively ensuring public and officer safety, and promotes public confidence in the MPD.”1 As the Independent Reviewer, I have been tasked with overseeing the successful implementation of the Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • When 'The State Made War', What Happened to Economic Inequality? Evidence from Preindustrial Germany (C.1400-1800)
    Economic History Working Papers No: 311 When ‘The State Made War’, what Happened to Economic Inequality? Evidence from Preindustrial Germany (c.1400-1800) Felix S.F. Schaff October 2020 Economic History Department, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, London, UK. T: +44 (0) 20 7955 7084. When `the State Made War', what Happened to Economic Inequality? Evidence from Preindustrial Germany (c. 1400-1800) Felix S.F. Schaff ∗ Abstract What was the impact of military conflict on economic inequality? This paper presents new evidence about the relationship between military conflicts and economic inequality in prein- dustrial Germany, between 1400 and 1800. I argue that ordinary military conflicts increased economic inequality. Warfare raised the financial needs of towns in preindustrial times, leading to more resource extraction from the population. This resource extraction happened via inegal- itarian channels, such as regressive taxation. The Thirty Years' War was an exception to that pattern but not the rule. To test this argument a novel panel dataset is constructed combining information about economic inequality in 72 localities and 687 conflicts over four centuries. The analysis suggests that there existed two countervailing effects of conflicts on inequality: destruc- tion and extraction. The Thirty Years' War was indeed a \Great Leveller" (Scheidel 2017), but the many ordinary conflicts { paradigmatic of life in the preindustrial world { were continuous reinforcers of economic inequality. Keywords: Wealth, Inequality, Warfare, Institutions, Political Economy, Germany. JEL Classification: N33, D31, I32, N43, H20. ∗London School of Economics and Political Science. Email: f.s.schaff@lse.ac.uk. This version: October 2020.
    [Show full text]