DOCSLIB.ORG

{Dоwnlоаd/Rеаd PDF Bооk} Messengers Angel Pdf Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MESSENGERS ANGEL PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Heather Killough-Walden | 416 pages | 21 Jun 2012 | Headline Publishing Group | 9780755380411 | English | London, United Kingdom 20 Bible verses about Angels, As God's Messengers Your gift enables our worldwide outreach. Donate Now. Fix that problem! Ligonier Ministries The teaching fellowship of R. Close Your Cart Loading Search Home Learn. Sproul Sinclair Ferguson W. Sproul R. Sproul Books That Influenced R. Coram Deo Interest in angels is at an all- time high in our culture, and many people long to have an encounter with them. Passages for Further Study Genesis 16 Judges Topics Angels and Demons. Sproul view entire collection. God also gave names to his angels to reveal something about their character. Only three angels are named in Scripture but the Bible indicates the significance of those names in contrast with the name of Jesus He shall save his people from their sins Matt. Lucifer is thought to be the original name for the devil. This name reflects not the present character of Satan but his original created purpose and character. Lucifer originally possessed a high place in heaven Isa. By bearing light, angels are messengers of God. Gabriel is the messenger angel of God. Gabriel is usually sent from God to man with a special message. Again, the name of Jesus surpasses the name of Gabriel. The third angel named in Scripture is the most powerful. Michael is usually related to Israel and the resurrection Dan. Angels in Judaism - Wikipedia Such differentiation has been taken over by later vernacular translations of the Bible , early Christian and Jewish exegetes and eventually modern scholars. Depending on the context, the Hebrew word may refer to a human messenger or to a supernatural messenger. Examples of a supernatural messenger [12] are the " Malak YHWH ," who is either a messenger from God, [13] an aspect of God such as the Logos , [14] or God himself as the messenger the " theophanic angel. Scholar Michael D. Coogan notes that it is only in the late books that the terms "come to mean the benevolent semi-divine beings familiar from later mythology and art. These angels are part of Daniel's apocalyptic visions and are an important part of all apocalyptic literature. In Daniel 7 , Daniel receives a dream-vision from God. Coogan explains the development of this concept of angels: "In the postexilic period, with the development of explicit monotheism, these divine beings—the 'sons of God' who were members of the Divine Council —were in effect demoted to what are now known as 'angels', understood as beings created by God, but immortal and thus superior to humans. Philo of Alexandria identifies the angel with the Logos inasmuch as the angel is the immaterial voice of God. The angel is something different from God himself, but is conceived as God's instrument. Four classes of ministering angels minister and utter praise before the Holy One, blessed be He: the first camp led by Michael on His right, the second camp led by Gabriel on His left, the third camp led by Uriel before Him, and the fourth camp led by Raphael behind Him; and the Shekhinah of the Holy One, blessed be He, is in the centre. He is sitting on a throne high and exalted [21]. In post-Biblical Judaism , certain angels took on particular significance and developed unique personalities and roles. Although these archangels were believed to rank among the heavenly host , no systematic hierarchy ever developed. Metatron is considered one of the highest of the angels in Merkabah and Kabbalist mysticism and often serves as a scribe; he is briefly mentioned in the Talmud [22] and figures prominently in Merkabah mystical texts. Michael, who serves as a warrior [23] and advocate for Israel Daniel , is looked upon particularly fondly. There is no evidence in Judaism for the worship of angels , but there is evidence for the invocation and sometimes even conjuration of angels. According to Kabbalah , there are four worlds and our world is the last world: the world of action Assiyah. Angels exist in the worlds above as a 'task' of God. They are an extension of God to produce effects in this world. After an angel has completed its task, it ceases to exist. The angel is in effect the task. This is derived from the book of Genesis when Abraham meets with three angels and Lot meets with two. The task of one of the angels was to inform Abraham of his coming child. The other two were to save Lot and to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah. This leads Aristotle in turn to the demonstrated fact that God, glory and majesty to Him, does not do things by direct contact. God burns things by means of fire; fire is moved by the motion of the sphere; the sphere is moved by means of a disembodied intellect, these intellects being the 'angels which are near to Him', through whose mediation the spheres move Maimonides had a neo- Aristotelian interpretation of the Bible. Maimonides writes that to the wise man, one sees that what the Bible and Talmud refer to as "angels" are actually allusions to the various laws of nature; they are the principles by which the physical universe operates. For all forces are angels! How blind, how perniciously blind are the naive?! If you told someone who purports to be a sage of Israel that the Deity sends an angel who enters a woman's womb and there forms an embryo, he would think this a miracle and accept it as a mark of the majesty and power of the Deity, despite the fact that he believes an angel to be a body of fire one third the size of the entire world. All this, he thinks, is possible for God. But if you tell him that God placed in the sperm the power of forming and demarcating these organs, and that this is the angel, or that all forms are produced by the Active Intellect; that here is the angel, the "vice-regent of the world" constantly mentioned by the sages, then he will recoil. Maimonides , in his Yad ha-Chazakah : Yesodei ha-Torah , counts ten ranks of angels in the Jewish angelic hierarchy, beginning from the highest:. From the Jewish Encyclopedia , entry "Angelology". Only these two angels are mentioned by name in the Hebrew Bible; the rest are from extra- biblical tradition. Later Christians inherited Jewish understandings of angels, which in turn may have been partly inherited from the Egyptians. Later came identification of individual angelic messengers: Gabriel , Michael , Raphael , and Uriel. According to St. Augustine , " 'Angel' is the name of their office, not of their nature. If you seek the name of their nature, it is 'spirit'; if you seek the name of their office, it is 'angel': from what they are, 'spirit', from what they do, 'angel'. By the late 4th century, the Church Fathers agreed that there were different categories of angels, with appropriate missions and activities assigned to them. There was, however, some disagreement regarding the nature of angels. Some argued that angels had physical bodies, [31] while some maintained that they were entirely spiritual. Some theologians had proposed that angels were not divine but on the level of immaterial beings subordinate to the Trinity. The resolution of this Trinitarian dispute included the development of doctrine about angels. The angels are represented throughout the Christian Bible as spiritual beings intermediate between God and men: "You have made him [man] a little less than the angels Christians believe that angels are created beings, based on Psalms —5 ; Colossians : "praise ye Him, all His angels: praise ye Him, all His hosts He commanded and they were created The council's decree Firmiter credimus issued against the Albigenses declared both that angels were created and that men were created after them. Thomas Aquinas 13th century relates angels to Aristotle's metaphysics in his Summa contra Gentiles , [34] Summa Theologica , [35] and in De substantiis separatis , [36] a treatise on angelology. Although angels have greater knowledge than men, they are not omniscient , as Matthew points out. Forget not to show love unto strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares. The New Testament includes many interactions and conversations between angels and humans. For instance, three separate cases of angelic interaction deal with the births of John the Baptist and Jesus Christ. In Luke , an angel appears to Zechariah to inform him that he will have a child despite his old age, thus proclaiming the birth of John the Baptist. Angels then proclaim the birth of Jesus in the Adoration of the shepherds in Luke According to Matthew , after Jesus spent 40 days in the desert, " Pope John Paul II emphasized the role of angels in Catholic teachings in his address titled " Angels Participate In History Of Salvation ", in which he suggested that modern mentality should come to see the importance of angels. According to the Vatican's Congregation for Divine Worship and Discipline of the Sacraments, "The practice of assigning names to the Holy Angels should be discouraged, except in the cases of Gabriel, Raphael and Michael whose names are contained in Holy Scripture. The New Church denominations that arose from the writings of theologian Emanuel Swedenborg have distinct ideas about angels and the spiritual world in which they dwell. Adherents believe that all angels are in human form with a spiritual body, and are not just minds without form. Such a society of angels can appear as one angel as a whole. All angels originate from the human race, and there is not one angel in heaven who first did not live in a material body.
Recommended publications
  • Doctrine of Angels, Satan, and Demons

    Doctrine of Angels, Satan, and Demons

    ANGELOLOGY # 1: DOCTRINE OF ANGELS, SATAN, AND DEMONS ANGELS Angelology is an important, misunderstood, and doctrinally abused area of Systematic Theology. At times in history it has been a neglected doctrine because the modern, lib- eral theological mind rejects the existence of supernatural, spirit beings. The concept of angels has become more prominent today, but that is due to extra-biblical and unbib- lical notions of angels. There have been television shows about angels, numerous books and magazine articles have been written with angels as the subject, the churchianity marketplace is loaded with angelic merchandise, and people oriented toward the mystical often claim they are receiving angelic visions and visitations. Much of this is un- biblical and a serious waste of time, but there is a much more ominous element of An- gelology at work today. Video games, television programming, various genres of rock- and-roll music but especially heavy metal rock music, tattoo parlors, and Hollywood movies are saturated with “entertainment” that is promoting demonic activity. Attend- ing a heavy metal rock concert is to attend a satanic worship service. Man has no way of knowing about the existence of angels apart from biblical revela- tion; therefore, the only way to accurately understand Angelology is to allow the Bible to reveal the facts of the doctrine to us. In that way, angelic beings are not ignored as non-existent because the Bible clearly reveals their existence, and they are not over- emphasized because the Bible does not over-emphasize them. Allowing the Bible to speak prevents engaging in the extremes at both ends.
  • Ken Guindon Has Written a Well-Documented Account of His Theological Foray Into the Liturgical Churches That Is Both Relevant and Insightful

    Ken Guindon Has Written a Well-Documented Account of His Theological Foray Into the Liturgical Churches That Is Both Relevant and Insightful

    Ken Guindon has written a well-documented account of his theological foray into the liturgical churches that is both relevant and insightful. His impeccable scholarship and convincing argumentation demands the attention of everyone enamored with Catholicism or Orthodoxy. This is a book that needed to be written, and we should be grateful that one so competent and intelligent has done just that. More than a mental exercise or academic investigation, the substance of this book stems from the crucible of personal experience. Sharing personal lessons from his cross-cultural immersion into sacerdotalism, he attacks no straw men, but carefully and candidly documents ecclesiastical distinctions long recognized, but frequently overlooked. Like David returning from the Philistines, the author has returned to the evangelical fold with a greater appreciation of the gospel. More pioneer than prodigal, the author “came to his senses” with a reaffirmation of faith that is both inspiring and sobering. We welcome him back with honor and kudos for a sensitive critique of Orthodoxy and Catholicism that is both transparent and courageous. —Stephen Brown Professor of Bible and History, Shasta Bible College and Graduate School Because of a number of recent accounts of evangelicals joining the Roman Catholic or the Eastern Orthodox Church, this is an important and much-needed book. Through the examination of church history, theology and Scripture, Ken Guindon shares his spiritual journey and explains why he returned to evangelical Christianity. His study is fair-minded and well-written, and provides a sound defense for his decision. —Edmond C. Gruss, Professor Emeritus, The Master’s College This is a very pertinent book for our time when many prize church history and personal experience above Biblical truth in their search for spiritual vitality.
  • The Language Ofgod

    The Language Ofgod

    the language of god understanding the quran daniel C peterson the faith ofislam one ofthe three great abrahamic religions as they might be called is closely akin to the other two judaism and christianity it is tightly bound to and thoroughly permeated by its holy book the aurqur an strangely though despite the historical and contemporary impor- tance ofislam and despite islam s kinship with the faith that has dominated western civilization neither islam in general nor the quran in particular is well known in the west nor do westerners typically know very much about the founder of islam the prophet muhammad 1 yet the story of muhammad is a dramatic one and islam fascinating in its own right is both sufficiently different from christianity and sufficiently similar to allow its study to throw intriguing light upon the faith even of non muslims who devote themselves to the sub- ject much in the way that the study of a second language may enable stu- dents to better understand their own reflection upon islam I1 am con- vinced can profit jews and chris- tians as well as muslims in this essay I1 shall concentrate upon what the quran has to say and what its own nature discloses about islam s view ofthe role and character of language I1 do not restrict this dis- cussion to human language because significantly the aurqur an itself does not seem to distinguish in any rigid way between the language of god 0 the language of angels and the lan- 1 guage of mortal human beings the revelation of the aurqur an began in or near AD 610glogio and contin- ued
  • Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadīth Tradition

    Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadīth Tradition

    MUHAMMAD SPEAKING OF THE MESSIAH: JESUS IN THE HADĪTH TRADITION A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Fatih Harpci (May 2013) Examining Committee Members: Prof. Khalid Y. Blankinship, Advisory Chair, Department of Religion Prof. Vasiliki Limberis, Department of Religion Prof. Terry Rey, Department of Religion Prof. Zameer Hasan, External Member, TU Department of Physics © Copyright 2013 by Fatih Harpci All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Much has been written about Qur’ānic references to Jesus (‘Īsā in Arabic), yet no work has been done on the structure or formal analysis of the numerous references to ‘Īsā in the Hadīth, that is, the collection of writings that report the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad. In effect, non-Muslims and Muslim scholars neglect the full range of Prophet Muhammad’s statements about Jesus that are in the Hadīth. The dissertation’s main thesis is that an examination of the Hadīths’ reports of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward ‘Īsā will lead to fuller understandings about Jesus-‘Īsā among Muslims and propose to non-Muslims new insights into Christian tradition about Jesus. In the latter process, non-Muslims will be encouraged to re-examine past hostile views concerning Muhammad and his words about Jesus. A minor thesis is that Western readers in particular, whether or not they are Christians, will be aided to understand Islamic beliefs about ‘Īsā, prophethood, and eschatology more fully. In the course of the dissertation, Hadīth studies will be enhanced by a full presentation of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward Jesus-‘Īsā.
  • Temple Imagery in Philo: an Indication of the Origin of the Logos?

    Temple Imagery in Philo: an Indication of the Origin of the Logos?

    Margaret Barker Temple Imagery In Philo: An Indication Of The Origin Of The Logos? Originally published in W. Horbury, ed, Templum Amicitiae: Essays on the Second Temple Presented to Ernst Bammel (JSOT Press: Sheffield, 1991), pp. 70-102. Philo’s Logos is a perennial problem. As we know, Philo was presenting his Judaism in Greek terms; much has been written on the Greek elements in his work and the philosophies to which he related his Judaism. But has that Judaism been correctly described? Where in it did Philo find any basis for his Logos? It is hard to accept Wolfson’s view of the Logos: It is a matter of indifference to us whether in Judaism before the time of Philo the personification of the term Logos meant that the Word of God was already considered as a real being created by God or whether its personification was merely a figure of speech.1 He clearly describes a separate heavenly being, and this sets a problem for orthodox monotheism. Thus A.F. Segal says of Philo’s doctrine: In doing this he has an entirely different emphasis than the rabbis. He is clearly following the Greek philosophers. Like them he is reluctant to conceive of a pure eternal God who participates directly in the affairs of the corruptible world. So he employs a system of mediation by which God is able to reach into the transient world, act in it, fill it as well as transcend material existence without implying a change in his essence.2 But was he following the philosophers? Was he not rather relating his own faith to their ideas and describing it in their 71 terms? Why, for example, if his Logos resembles Aristotle’s nous is it not Aristotle’s nous? Time and again there seem to be restraints on what he can say.
  • ANGELS in ISLAM a Commentary with Selected Translations of Jalāl

    ANGELS in ISLAM a Commentary with Selected Translations of Jalāl

    ANGELS IN ISLAM A Commentary with Selected Translations of Jalāl al-Dīn al-Suyūṭī’s Al-Ḥabā’ik fī akhbār al- malā’ik (The Arrangement of the Traditions about Angels) S. R. Burge Doctor of Philosophy The University of Edinburgh 2009 A loose-leaf from a MS of al-Qazwīnī’s, cAjā’ib fī makhlūqāt (British Library) Source: Du Ry, Carel J., Art of Islam (New York: Abrams, 1971), p. 188 0.1 Abstract This thesis presents a commentary with selected translations of Jalāl al-Dīn cAbd al- Raḥmān al-Suyūṭī’s Al-Ḥabā’ik fī akhbār al-malā’ik (The Arrangement of the Traditions about Angels). The work is a collection of around 750 ḥadīth about angels, followed by a postscript (khātima) that discusses theological questions regarding their status in Islam. The first section of this thesis looks at the state of the study of angels in Islam, which has tended to focus on specific issues or narratives. However, there has been little study of the angels in Islamic tradition outside studies of angels in the Qur’an and eschatological literature. This thesis hopes to present some of this more general material about angels. The following two sections of the thesis present an analysis of the whole work. The first of these two sections looks at the origin of Muslim beliefs about angels, focusing on angelic nomenclature and angelic iconography. The second attempts to understand the message of al-Suyūṭī’s collection and the work’s purpose, through a consideration of the roles of angels in everyday life and ritual.
  • Jesus As God's Word a Comparative Study in Islamic and Christian

    Jesus As God's Word a Comparative Study in Islamic and Christian

    Australian Journal of Islamic Studies https://ajis.com.au ISSN (online): 2207-4414 Centre for Islamic Studies and Civilisation Charles Sturt University CRICOS 00005F Islamic Sciences and Research Academy of Australia Jesus as God’s Word A Comparative Study in Islamic and Christian Theologies Grant R. Kynaston To cite this article: Kynaston, Grant R. “Jesus as God’s Word: A Comparative Study in Islamic and Christian Theologies.” Australian Journal of Islamic Studies 3, no. 2 (2018): 68-85. Published online: 19 November 2018 Submit your article to this journal View related and/or other articles in this issue Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://ajis.com.au/index.php/ajis/tncs Australian Journal of Islamic Studies JESUS AS GOD’S WORD: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN ISLAMIC AND CHRISTIAN THEOLOGIES Grant R. Kynaston* Abstract: Both the Christian New Testament and the Qur’ān obscurely identify the figure of Jesus with the ‘Word’. While the term’s Biblical use is well-treated by, and indeed central to, Christological theology, modern treatments of the Islamic model are often reductive, refracted through Christian understandings. This article seeks to provide a more holistic account of Jesus’ title in Islam, highlighting the nuances in the term’s usage through a comparative framework. It considers the title’s connotations in Christianity and Islam, and how each conceptualised and developed them separately. This article concludes that, in both traditions, the term links Jesus to God’s revelation, and to His creative capacity; however, the religions’ distinct theological axioms differentiate the term’s true signification.
  • From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology

    From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology

    From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by Wynand Albertus de Beer submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of D Litt et Phil in the subject Religious Studies at the University of South Africa Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen February 2015 Dedicated with grateful acknowledgements to my supervisor, Professor Danie Goosen, for his wise and patient guidance and encouragement throughout my doctoral research, and to the examiners of my thesis for their helpful comments and suggestions. From Logos to Bios: Hellenic Philosophy and Evolutionary Biology by W.A. de Beer Degree: D Litt et Phil Subject: Religious Studies Supervisor: Prof Danie Goosen Summary: This thesis deals with the relation of Hellenic philosophy to evolutionary biology. The first part entails an explication of Hellenic cosmology and metaphysics in its traditional understanding, as the Western component of classical Indo-European philosophy. It includes an overview of the relevant contributions by the Presocratics, Plato, Aristotle, and the Neoplatonists, focussing on the structure and origin of both the intelligible and sensible worlds. Salient aspects thereof are the movement from the transcendent Principle into the realm of Manifestation by means of the interaction between Essence and Substance; the role of the Logos, being the equivalent of Plato’s Demiurge and Aristotle’s Prime Mover, in the cosmogonic process; the interaction between Intellect and Necessity in the formation of the cosmos; the various kinds of causality contributing to the establishment of physical reality; and the priority of being over becoming, which in the case of living organisms entails the primacy of soul over body.
  • From Heraclitus Perspective (Cross Symbol Pattern in Iranians' Thought

    From Heraclitus Perspective (Cross Symbol Pattern in Iranians' Thought

    Vol.13/No.42/Dec 2016 Received 2015/06/20 Accepted 2015/12/13 Observing the relationship between the word “logos” from Heraclitus perspective (Cross Symbol Pattern in Iranians’ thought) Somayeh Saffari Ahmadabad* Mohammadreza Sharifzadeh** Abstract Discussion of Logos in Heraclitus idea will be seen is represented with ontological sight of this Greek philosopher. Therefore, to clarify the concept of logos from his perspective and facing it to address it with questions about the epistemology of Cross Symbol’s role which is _the main purpose of this study- , first, the term Logos in Heraclitus’ ideas is investigated. Heraclitus believed Logos as a worldwide principle and rule which surrounded the world. It is a unique matter but common for everyone and appears as a light in the middle of fire. In Iranian’s Mythology Asha Vahishta like Logos symbolize global system, Act of God and morality in the world which introduce fire as its representative on earth. This fire has an old relationship with Corss Symbol Pattern. Accordingly, in this study, some ideas have been taken into considerations which review the external and internal coordinatescharacteristics of Logos with Asha vahishta, being in line with their alignment with the Cross Symbol. Thus, to determine the epistemological relationship between these two transcendental concepts and symbol and to answer thisthe main question that if it is possible to consider the Cross Symbol as tangible symbol for Logos,concerning the possibility of regarding cross as the visual symbol of Logos, first, Heraclitus parts about Logos and the mystery of the universe which is hidden in it, along with its possible impact of ancient Iranians’ thoughts are studied we reviewed Heraclitus’ fragments about Logos and its hidden mystery of the universe as well as its possible impact on the ancient Iranians thoughts.
  • Study Guide for Ordination Exam

    Study Guide for Ordination Exam

    Confederation of Reformed Evangelicals Study Guide for Ordination Exam KEY Theology 1. List four kinds of theology: a. Biblical Theology. b. Historical Theology. c. Practical Theology. d. Systematic Theology. 2. Name four of the methods by which God specifically revealed Himself and His will in the Old Covenant. a. Dreams. b. Visions. c. Angels. d. Face-to-face. 3. The idea that God the Creator has revealed Himself in His work is known as Natural Revelation. 4. Special Revelation is where God revealed Himself through the prophets, apostles, and His Son, and as these were divinely recorded in Scripture. 5. Inspiration is the supernatural influence of the Holy Spirit upon divinely chosen men by which their writings become trustworthy and authoritative. 6. Infallible is the term used to describe the facts that the word of God perfectly achieves its end, gives us reliable testimony, and provides us with an authoritative norm for faith and life. 7. What is the interpretive method required by the rules of grammar and the facts of history? Grammatico-historical method. 8. What is meant by the “analogy of faith?” Scripture interprets Scripture. 9. The list of books recognized by the church as the authoritative word of God. The Canon. 10.These thirteen extra-canonical books were accepted at the Council of Carthage (397) as suitable for reading, but were rejected by the Reformers as unworthy and contradictory to the accepted canon of Scripture. The Apocrypha. 11. The Septuagint is the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament. 12.List three ways that God makes Himself known? a.
  • The Liturgical Reception of Isaiah 6

    The Liturgical Reception of Isaiah 6

    Worship as Interpretation: The Liturgical Reception of Isaiah 6 Sebastian Yosef Selvén Wolfson College, Cambridge June, 2017 This dissertation is submitted to the University of Cambridge for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy ▪ This dissertation is the result of my own work and includes nothing which is the outcome of work done in collaboration except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. ▪ It is not substantially the same as any that I have submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for a degree or diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text. I further state that no substantial part of my dissertation has already been submitted, or, is being concurrently submitted for any such degree, diploma or other qualification at the University of Cambridge or any other University or similar institution except as declared in the Preface and specified in the text ▪ It does not exceed the prescribed word limit for the relevant Degree Committee. 2 This dissertation is an investigation into how the Hebrew Bible is used in (Rabbinic) Jewish and Christian liturgical settings, and how this impacts biblical scholars. I argue against the neglect of liturgy and ritual in reception studies and make the case that liturgy is one of the major influential forms of biblical reception. I do this by taking Isa. 6:3 as my example. My liturgical material is the qedushah liturgies in Ashkenazi Judaism and the Sanctus in three church traditions; (pre-1969) Roman Catholicism, Anglicanism (the Church of England) and Lutheranism (Martin Luther, and the Church of Sweden).
  • Specific Angels

    Specific Angels

    Christian Angelology Specific Angels Angel of the Lord One mysterious angel is the “Angel of the Lord”. Sometimes Scripture merely says "an angel", but other times uses the phrase “Angel of the Lord”. In some of these later occasions this angel is so closely tied to God as to make the angel seemingly equal to God. One case is in Exodus 3:2-4 where the “Angel of the Lord appeared to him [Moses] in a flame of fire out of a bush” and then “God called him out of the bush”. Another case is Joshua 5:14 where the Angel of the Lord accepts worship from Joshua unlike other angels. (Rev 19:10) He also acts as God in many cases such as forgiving sin, (Zech 3:4) and claims God’s actions as his own. (Judges 2:1) Traditionally, from the Church Fathers up to and including the Reformers, the Angel of the Lord has often been considered a Christophany. Because Jesus did not come into being at the Incarnation, but always existed as God, he must have had a pre-incarnate existence during the Old Testament. It has been believed that the reason for the close connection between this angel and God is because he is really an appearance of Jesus. On the other hand there are some legitimate issues with this view. First, the New Testament never directly makes this connection which would seem a vary obvious thing to do, particularly in Hebrews. This would be such a strong argument for Christ that it seems unusual to be left out.