Register of Pecuniary Interests Summary 2010 Final

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Register of Pecuniary Interests Summary 2010 Final J. 7 Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament: Summary of annual returns as at 31 January 2010 Forty-ninth Parliament Presented to the House of Representatives pursuant to Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 2 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 MISTER SPEAKER I have the honour to provide to you, pursuant to clause 16(3) of Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives, a copy of the summary booklet containing a fair and accurate description of the information contained in the Register of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament, as at 31 January 2010. Dame Margaret Bazley DNZM, Hon DLit Registrar of Pecuniary Interests of Members of Parliament 3 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 Introduction Since 2005 Standing Orders have provided a system for members of Parliament to register their pecuniary interests, such as the assets, debts and gifts they may each have accumulated or received. This provides a protection against arguments that a possible conflict might arise between a member’s public duty and private interests. If certain things are made known and registered, concerns regarding conflicts of interest can be minimised. The requirements are set out in Standing Order 159 and Appendix B of the Standing Orders of the House of Representatives. It is a register designed to protect members in the event of scrutiny, rather than being a recital of wealth and indebtedness. It is also a registration of the kind of interests, not their individual value or specific location. Appendix B of the Standing Orders is reproduced as an annex to this booklet. Members are required to register interests in 13 categories set out in clauses 4 to 7 of Appendix B. These are listed below. Items 1 to 9 require a ‘snapshot’ of interests as at 31 January 2010. Items 10 to 13 cover the period from the member’s previous return, or from their election to Parliament, until 31 January 2010. This booklet summarises the information provided in members’ returns in respect of any of the categories below. 1 Company directorships and controlling interests (clause 4(1)(a)) 2 Interests (such as shares and bonds) in companies and business entities (clauses 4(1)(b) and 4(2)) 3 Employment (clause 4(1)(c)) 4 Beneficial interests in trusts (clause 4(1)(d)) 5 Organisations and trusts seeking Government funding (clause 4(1)(e)) 6 Real property (clause 4(1)(f)) 7 Superannuation schemes (clause 4(1)(g)) 8 Debtors (clauses 4(1)(h), 4(3), 5, and 6) 9 Creditors (clauses 4(1)(i), 4(3), 5, and 6) 10 Overseas travel costs (clauses 7(1)(a) and 7(2)) 11 Gifts (clauses 7(1)(b) and 7(3)) 12 Discharged debts (clause 7(1)(c)) 13 Payments for activities (clause 7(1)(d)) For details of declaration requirements in each category, the clause references in Appendix B of the Standing Orders (see Annex) are given above. Note about gifts Several members have identified Air New Zealand’s Koru Club and the Qantas Chairman’s Lounge as gifts from the airlines. The annual value of these is borderline in terms of the $500 threshold above which items must be registered. Therefore, members have made varying decisions about whether to include these in their returns. Rather than including these in each member’s entry, this note serves to identify that these items are a gift that many, if not all, members have in common. 4 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 Comment In the 2009 Summary I noted that there had been a high level of effort on the part of members to comply fully with the requirements to declare their interests, and to apply the principles stated by the Privileges Committee in 2008.1 These principles include: o Members making an honest attempt to declare all pecuniary interests that they hold o Members turning their minds to the interests that they have o Members taking the approach of “if in doubt, declare it”. The lodging of returns this year has shown a similar high level of effort by members. For all but one member, this was at least their second return of pecuniary interests so they were already familiar with the process. I wish to acknowledge members’ cooperation with the requirements and timeframe set out in Standing Orders. Māori land interests In 2009 I gave particular consideration to the requirements to declare interests in trusts and real property, and how those requirements apply to members with interests in jointly-held Māori land. Members are required to declare the name of each trust in which the member has a beneficial interest and, separately, the location of each parcel of real property in which the member has a pecuniary interest, unless the member has no beneficial interest in the real property (clause 4(1)(d) and (f) of Appendix B of Standing Orders). Therefore, members are required to declare an interest in real property held in a trust, unless they have no beneficial interest in it, as well as any interest in real property that is owned directly by the member. I have become aware that these requirements are causing complexities for members who have interests in Māori land. This refers specifically to land as defined in section 129 of Te Ture Whenua Maori Act 1993 as Māori customary land, Māori freehold land or general land owned by Māori. This land is frequently held in a trust, which may have numerous beneficiaries. Members have indicated to me that it can be difficult to identify interests they may have in jointly-held Māori land, making it challenging for members with such interests to comply with the requirements in Standing Orders. These requirements do not make any distinction between declaring this type of trust or land interest, and any other trust or land. Also, in its 2008 report the Privileges Committee found that members are expected to take responsibility for knowing their own interests. Given that these 1 Question of privilege relating to compliance with a member’s obligations under the Standing Orders dealing with pecuniary interests, Report of the Privileges Committee, September 2008 (I.17D) 5 REGISTER OF PECUNIARY INTERESTS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT: SUMMARY OF ANNUAL RETURNS J. 7 requirements were clearly causing problems in some specific situations, I decided to hold meetings with members to give them the opportunity to explain the difficulties to me. I wished to ascertain whether there was a real and substantial difference between having an interest in Māori land and having an interest in any other real property, such that would justify a different level of declaration in members’ returns of pecuniary interests. Several issues were identified at discussions and meetings to which all members were invited. I have considered these issues, which related both to practical matters and to the principle of whether such interests should be declared. Practical issues include: o Members may not know that they have an interest in a Māori land trust, as they may be one of hundreds of beneficiaries. o Where they are aware of their interest in such a trust, it can be onerous to identify the particular blocks of land held by the trust. Matters of principle include: o Whether an interest in Māori land is essentially different from other land interests, as the land usually cannot be sold. o Māori land is viewed as an inheritance, not a commodity. o Do these factors mean that members may not have a true pecuniary interest in such land? While I understand the difficulties members have in this area, I do not consider that this relieves them of the obligation to declare their interest in Māori land and land trusts. Standing Orders require members to disclose the name of each trust in which the member has a beneficial interest (cl 4(1)(d)). This, supported by the guidance given by the Privileges Committee, leads me to the view that members should turn their minds to these interests and make a reasonable attempt to identify each trust in which they have an interest. I also do not consider that the requirement to declare these interests is reduced in any way by the fact that the interest may be extremely small, or that the land may not be able to be sold. Standing Orders make no distinction as to the size of an interest; any relevant interest should be declared. I also consider that a pecuniary interest in real property is not limited to the potential profits from sale of the property. For example, beneficiaries of Māori land trusts often receive annual payments from those trusts. In terms of registering the land itself, members must disclose the location of each parcel of real property in which the member has a pecuniary interest, unless the member has no beneficial interest in the real property (cl 4(1)(f)). For all land and other real property, members are expected to give a general location but not a street address. I do not consider it necessary or reasonable to expect members to identify each individual parcel of Māori land by its Māori Land Court block number. It is acceptable for members to identify the general location only. This could be described in several ways, but an example of wording could be “Various Māori land blocks in [name of district], held by [name of] Trust”.
Recommended publications
  • King's College Foundation Annual Report
    King’s College Foundation Annual Report 2018 It was fantastic to see some of our Foundation Members attend the Foundation Cocktails event before watching the 2018 Glee Club’s performance of Guys and Dolls. Foundation Annual Report 2018 1 President’s Report It gives me much pleasure to I would like to acknowledge the outstanding We are very pleased to have engaged the leadership of Headmaster Simon Lamb, as services of Giving Architects and its principal, present my report for the year King’s continues to excel across a wide variety Clive Pedley. Clive has brought his considerable ended 31 December 2018. of activities. Testament to Simon’s leadership is organisational skills and fundraising experience the strong roll, high quality of teaching staff and to the table as this hugely significant campaign The King’s College great spirit within the College. gathers momentum. Foundation has again been In my report last year, I advised that I would be The Foundation will be assisting financially actively engaged with stepping down as Foundation President and that with support for this wide-ranging capital Simon Power would be filling my position. development at King’s, that will take place over helping the College across a the next 10 or so years. It became apparent midway through the year range of activities. that the major fundraising appeal would require an independent leadership structure, which at Investment Fund that stage was not in place. It will possibly come as no surprise to many of To facilitate a smooth transition, the Foundation you that our Investment Fund could not match decided that until the structure was decided the stellar returns of 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Fourth Triennial Parliamentary
    A.14 REPORT OF THE FOURTH TRIENNIAL PARLIAMENTARY APPROPRIATIONS REVIEW June 2010 INDEX 1. SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 Principles for parliamentary funding ...................................................... 2 Parliamentary Service ............................................................................... 2 Funding entitlements ................................................................................. 3 Office of the Clerk ...................................................................................... 5 The way ahead ............................................................................................ 5 2. RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 7 Administrative and support services ........................................................ 7 Funding of MPs’ staffing entitlements ..................................................... 7 Parliamentary Service ............................................................................... 7 Funding entitlements: general .................................................................. 8 Travel entitlements .................................................................................... 8 Wellington accommodation entitlement .................................................. 8 Individual member support .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Original Attachment
    Call Sign Location AAA OHAKEA AAA1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA6 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA7 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA8 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAA9 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD10 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD11 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD12 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD14 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD15 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD16 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD17 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD18 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD19 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD20 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD21 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD22 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD23 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD24 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD25 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD26 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD27 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD28 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD29 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD30 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD31 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD32 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD33 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD34 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD35 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD50 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD51 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD52 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD6 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD7 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD8 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAD9 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADN AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS1 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS2 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS3 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS4 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AADS5 AUCKLAND CITY DISTRICT AAF10 METRO CRIME AAF11 METRO CRIME AAF12
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Presence: Political Representation and New Zealand’S Asian Members of Parliament
    THE POLITICS OF PRESENCE: POLITICAL REPRESENTATION AND NEW ZEALAND’S ASIAN MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT By Seonah Choi A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science at Victoria University of Wellington 2014 2 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................. 3 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... 5 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 6 Chapter I: Introduction .......................................................................................................... 8 Chapter II: Literature Review .............................................................................................. 11 2.1 Representative Democracy ........................................................................................ 11 2.2 Theories of Political Representation .......................................................................... 12 2.3 Theories of Minority Representation ......................................................................... 27 2.4 Formulating a Framework ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LAW REFORM and the ADOPTION ACT 1955: a HISTORY of MISFORTUNE Research Paper for LAWS 526: Law Reform and Policy
    ISLA MIRREN DOIDGE LAW REFORM AND THE ADOPTION ACT 1955: A HISTORY OF MISFORTUNE Research Paper for LAWS 526: Law Reform and Policy Submitted for the LLB (Honours) Degree Faculty of Law Victoria University of Wellington 2016 2 Law Reform and the Adoption Act 1955: A History of Misfortune Law Reform and the Adoption Act 1955: A History of Misfortune The Adoption Act 1955 is now 61 years old and has been passed over for reform on multiple occasions. This paper analyses the failed history of law reform beginning in the year 2000 when a Law Commission Report was issued. This paper identifies why successive attempts by both Labour and National governments failed in reforming adoption over a sixteen year period. Despite multiple attempts at reform, this paper argues that law reform has failed due to a combination of other important governmental priorities, the controversial issues involved in adoption, the ability of the courts to reinterpret the legislation, and the small impact of reform. This paper concludes by using adoption reform as a case study to draw out three main general principles about law reform. The first is the necessity of reform; this paper argues when law reform involves a controversial human rights problem it becomes simultaneously difficult to progress due to political risk, but once that controversy is resolved the reform is no longer considered as necessary. The second is the opportunity to reform; when law reform is seen as less necessary because other agencies are able fix problems within the legislation, other more critical projects will displace a reform project on the hierarchy of political priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Electorates and Electoral Populations: 2013 Census Embargoed Until 10:45Am – 07 October 2013
    Number of Electorates and Electoral Populations: 2013 Census Embargoed until 10:45am – 07 October 2013 Key facts The number of electorates will increase from 70 to 71 at the next general election. The number of North Island general electorates will increase from 47 to 48. The number of Māori electorates will remain at seven. The number of general electorates in the South Island is set at 16 by the Electoral Act 1993. In a 120-seat parliament (excluding any overhang seats), a total of 71 electorates will result in 49 list seats being allocated. This is one less list seat than in the 2011 General Election. The Representation Commission can now review the electorate boundaries for the next general election. Liz MacPherson 7 October 2013 Government Statistician ISBN 978-0-478-40854-6 Commentary Electoral populations increase since 2006 Number of electorates will increase Twenty-one current electorates vary from quota by more than 5 percent Enrolments on Māori roll increase Electoral populations increase since 2006 The general electoral population of the North Island is 2,867,110, up 176,673 (6.6 percent) from 2006. For the South Island it is 954,871, up 33,872 (3.7 percent) from 2006. Based on the latest electoral population figures, the electoral population quota (the average population in an electorate) is 59,731 people for each North Island general electorate and 59,679 people for each South Island general electorate. The general electoral population quota has increased by 2,488 people for the North Island and by 2,117 people for the South Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Form to Email
    To: Bee: Subject: NZ Superannuation Fund enquiry Date: Thursday, 6 December 2012 4: 10:53 PM Attachments: Guardians Final response to Israel petition.pdf Dea . , Thank you for your email via our website. Your comments have been noted and passed on to our Chairman and CEO. I have attached a copy of the Guardians' response to the petition and FYI the Committee's report is available at http://www parliament nz/NR/rdonlyres/60EEA9A7-4218-473F-BCFF- 2347E483EBEB/244228/DBSCH $CR 5595 Petjtjon2008143ofLojsGrjffithsand38 pdf We expect to be in a position to respond more fully to your email next week. In future, please feel free to contact me directly on the details below. Best regards Catherine Etheredge Catherine Etheredge Head of Communications DDI: Mobile: Email: A Great Team Building the Best Portfolio PO Box 106 607, Auckland 1143, New Zealand Level 12, Zurich House, 21 Queen Street, Auckland 1010, New Zealand Office: +64 9 300 6980 I Fax: +64 9 300 6981 I Web: www.nzsuperfund.co.nz From: formmail@digitaistream co oz [mailto·formmail@digitaistream co oz] Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2012 2:53 p.m. To: Enquiries Subject: Query from website Form to Email Form to email received the following values Name - Company Optional Phone email from Contact Email me by Website feedback Responsible Investment Query re Responsible Investment Dear NZ Superfund, Please send this message to the Board or at least to the Chair. In September 2011,ex-MP Keith Locke presented a petition to Parliament, ■■■■■I asking for Parliament to ask the Guardians of Superfund to divest ow ve een to t at t e ommerce ommIttee as reJecte e pe 1 I0n.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 9 8.5 8.5 8 9 8.5 8 8 7 Roll Call
    ROLL CALL – How Our MPs Performed In 2011 Trans Tasman’s Editors have once again run their rule over NZ’s MPs and rated their performance in 2011. Roll Call looks at how they’ve performed in Caucus, Cabinet, Committee, the House, their electorate and the influence they bring, or are likely, to bring to bear in their various forums. This year being election year, there are some MPs who are no longer with us, and a host of newcomers and some better known returnees, who are not rated, but on whom we have commented regarding what we know of them, and what to expect from them. As we are rating MPs for their 2011 performances, new Cabinet or shadow Cabinet roles are not included. Cabinet Ministers This 2010 Year’s Name Seat/list Responsibilities Comments Rating Rating Key, John Helensville Prime Minister, Minister of Tourism, As one of NZ’s most popular ever PMs, Key did Ministerial Services, Minister in Charge what was needed by his party and delivered of the NZ Security, Intelligence Service, National a second term based almost entirely Minister Responsible for the GCSB upon “Brand Key.” Some of the Teflon armour flaked off over the year and some of his strongest supporters wonder whether he has a plan beyond careful political management 9 9 and upsetting as few people as possible. In the House Key was comfortable most of the time, though once or twice he showed a mean streak. He took a bit of a battering during the campaign itself, but a win is a win is a win.
    [Show full text]
  • Computers in Homes Annual Report 2013
    Computers in Homes Annual Report july 2013 Computers in Homes is an initiative of the 2020 Communications Trust. The programme receives support from the Government’s Digital Literacy and Connection Fund (administered by the Department of Internal Affairs) and the Ministry of Education as well as numerous business and community partners. Website: www.computersinhomes.org.nz The 2020 Communications Trust is a registered charitable Trust, established in 1996. Website: www.2020.org.nz Contents Comment from Programme Director. 5 Comment from National Coordinator. 7 Comment from Project Researcher. 8 Case Studies. .20 Far North . .24 Northland. .26 Auckland. 28 Waikato. .30 Bay of Plenty. .32 Hawkes Bay. 34 Taranaki. .36 Wanganui . .38 Manawatu/Horowhenua. .40 Wairarapa. .42 Porirua. 44 Wellington/Lower Hutt. 46 Nelson/Marlborough. 48 Christchurch. .50 West Coast. 52 Dunedin. .54 Refugee Programme. .56 KiwiSkills. 58 Stepping UP. 60 Acknowledgements. 66 Front cover: The Pasifika community in Blenheim turned out in force to support the families graduating from Computers in Homes in May 2013. These Polyfest performers hurried back from their Christchurch competitions the night before, especially to honour their graduate parents. 4 ComPuteRs in Homes gRAduAtes 2012–13: Graduated In Training Dunedin Christchurch West Coast Nelson/Marlborough Wellington/Hutt Porirua Wairarapa Manawatu/Horowhenua Whanganui Taranaki/ Central North Is Hawkes Bay Bay of Plenty Waikato Auckland Northland Far North 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 ComPuteRs in Homes
    [Show full text]
  • Activist #10, 2009
    Rail & Maritime Transport Union Volume ISSUE # 101010 Published Regularly - ISSN 1178-7392 (Print & Online) 1 May 2009 LATEST STATS – UNEMPLOYMENT SHAREHOLDERS ELIGIBLE FOR BENEFIT COMPENSATION FROM TRANZ RAIL Latest statistics released shows that at the CASE end of March 2009, 37,000 working aged A list of the shareholders who are eligible for people (aged 18-64 years) were receiving compensation from the Tranz Rail insider is an Unemployment Benefit. Over the year available from the following Securities to March 2009, the number of recipients of Commission of NZ website link; an Unemployment Benefit increased by 18,000, or 95 percent. The link to the info http://www.seccom.govt.nz/tranz-rail-share- sheet is; refund.shtml#K http://www.msd.govt.nz/documents/abou Shareholders on this list can contact Geoff t-msd-and-our- work/newsroom/factsheets/benefit/2009 Brown on (04) 471 8295 or email /fact-sheet-ub-09-mar-31.doc [email protected] for information about how to claim their compensation. MAY DAY Claimants will need to verify their identity and shareholding details. They should May Day is celebrated and recognized as contact the Commission no later than 24 July the International Workers’ day, chosen over 2009 so that compensation can be paid. 100 years ago to commemorate the struggles and gains of workers and the labour PORTS FORUM movement. Most notable An interesting and reasons to celebrate are challenging programme the 8-hour day, is in store for delegates Saturday as part of the attending the 2009 weekend, improved National Ports Forum in working conditions and Wellington on 5 & 6 child labor laws.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Hansard Precedent Manual
    IND 1 NEW ZEALAND HANSARD PRECEDENT MANUAL Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 2 ABOUT THIS MANUAL The Precedent Manual shows how procedural events in the House appear in the Hansard report. It does not include events in Committee of the whole House on bills; they are covered by the Committee Manual. This manual is concerned with structure and layout rather than text - see the Style File for information on that. NB: The ways in which the House chooses to deal with procedural matters are many and varied. The Precedent Manual might not contain an exact illustration of what you are looking for; you might have to scan several examples and take parts from each of them. The wording within examples may not always apply. The contents of each section and, if applicable, its subsections, are included in CONTENTS at the front of the manual. At the front of each section the CONTENTS lists the examples in that section. Most sections also include box(es) containing background information; these boxes are situated at the front of the section and/or at the front of subsections. The examples appear in a column format. The left-hand column is an illustration of how the event should appear in Hansard; the right-hand column contains a description of it, and further explanation if necessary. At the end is an index. Precedent Manual: Index 16 July 2004 IND 3 INDEX Absence of Minister see Minister not present Amendment/s to motion Abstention/s ..........................................................VOT3-4 Address in reply ....................................................OP12 Acting Minister answers question.........................
    [Show full text]
  • The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation
    The Mixed Member Proportional Representation System and Minority Representation: A Case Study of Women and Māori in New Zealand (1996-2011) by Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers MSc. Government (University of the West Indies) 2008 B.A. History and Political Science (University of the West Indies) 2006 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Interdisciplinary Studies In the Graduate Academic Unit of the School of Graduate Studies Supervisor: Joanna Everitt, PhD, Dept. of History and Politics Examining Board: Emery Hyslop-Margison, PhD, Faculty of Education, Chair Paul Howe, PhD, Dept. of Political Science Lee Chalmers, PhD, Dept. of Sociology External Examiner: Karen Bird, PhD, Dept. of Political Science McMaster University This dissertation is accepted by the Dean of Graduate Studies THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK April, 2013 © Tracy-Ann Johnson-Myers, 2013 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the relationship between women and Māori descriptive and substantive representation in New Zealand’s House of Representatives as a result of the Mixed Member Proportional electoral system. The Mixed Member Proportional electoral system was adopted in New Zealand in 1996 to change the homogenous nature of the New Zealand legislative assembly. As a proportional representation system, MMP ensures that voters’ preferences are proportionally reflected in the party composition of Parliament. Since 1996, women and Māori (and other minority and underrepresented groups) have been experiencing significant increases in their numbers in parliament. Despite these increases, there remains the question of whether or not representatives who ‘stand for’ these two groups due to shared characteristics will subsequently ‘act for’ them through their political behaviour and attitudes.
    [Show full text]