DOCSLIB.ORG

Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 6.50.00) CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 139 Ï NUMBER 005 Ï 3rd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, February 6, 2004 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 243 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, February 6, 2004 The House met at 10 a.m. government House leader in that the Prime Minister should be able to claim this privilege. Prayers In his submission, the former government House leader on May 12, 2003 argued that in the Ainsworth decision, the B.C. court Ï (1000) confirmed the existence of parliamentary privilege of members against participating in legal proceedings when Parliament was in [English] session. The court recognized that this applied throughout the The Speaker: The Chair has received notice of a question of parliamentary session including adjournments and other periods privilege from the hon. member for Yorkton—Melville. I will now when the houses were not sitting. However, the court ruled that there hear the hon. member on the question of privilege. was no legal support for extending this privilege for 40 days before Ï (1005) or after a parliamentary session. PRIVILEGE The then government House leader felt the court's ruling raised an PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGE important issue. This is the question of whether it is the role of Parliament or the role of the courts to define what parliamentary Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville, CPC): Mr. Speaker, privilege is. I rise today on a question of privilege regarding a matter that was raised in a previous session. On May 12 and May 16, 2003 the On May 26, 2003 the Speaker ruled the matter was a prima facie former government House leader raised the issue of parliamentary question of privilege. He also agreed with some members that there privilege exempting members from being called as witnesses in any was a need for an even-handed application of privilege with respect court when the House is in session, specifically the decision of the to the rights of other Canadians. He pointed to a suggestion that it British Columbia Court of Appeal on April 23, 2003 in what is might be appropriate for the House to revisit its current interpretation known as the Ainsworth case. of the immunity that its privileges provide. He concluded by recognizing the special requirements of the House which make The issue raised in that case was whether the Prime Minister could privilege necessary, that there is need to ensure that other citizens are claim parliamentary privilege to provide legal protection against any not adversely affected by those privileges. action against him from the court for failing to attend an examination for discovery. He also raised the matter of a decision of the Ontario In particular, members had expressed concern during the debate Superior Court with respect to another member involving Telezone on the question of privilege that the blind application of the rights of Inc. members, such as the right not to be compelled to appear before a The latter was dealt with on January 6, 2004 when the Ontario court as a witness, might interfere unduly with the rights of others. Court of Appeal made a decision with respect to Telezone Inc. I believe that its decision satisfies the former government House The matter was referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure leader, although a number of questions remain. The Ontario Court of and House Affairs. The committee's initial research revealed that Appeal ruled that the parliamentary privilege of a member of there were two types of situations that can arise: one where a Parliament not to attend as a witness in a civil action applies member is a party to a civil action, the case involving the Prime throughout a session of Parliament and extends 40 days after the Minister; and one where the member is merely being asked to attend prorogation or dissolution of Parliament and 40 days before the as a witness, the case involving the former member for Ottawa commencement of a new session. South. The case of the Prime Minister remains unresolved because the The research claimed that while the parliamentary privilege to two cases are different. In the case of Attorney General of Canada, et avoid appearing in court as a witness does not apply to the Prime al. v. Ainsworth Lumber Co. Ltd. (B.C.) (29842), the Supreme Court Minister because he is named as a defendant in a civil action, the dismissed the application for leave to appeal. The Prime Minister privilege can be claimed by Mr. Manley because he was not named still does not have the right to claim this privilege. The issue of as a party in the case and was simply asked to appear as a witness in whether or not he can claim this privilege remains unresolved. It is the court. The recent decision from the Ontario Court of Appeal not clear whether or not the House agrees with the former would confirm that finding. 244 COMMONS DEBATES February 6, 2004 Points of Order The research also left many questions to be answered, such as POINTS OF ORDER whether the distinction between being a party to a civil action and being a witness is reasonable and should be reviewed. Should one STRIKING OF SPECIAL COMMITTEE privilege be extended or the other limited? How should these privileges relate to criminal matters? What is the privilege procedure Mr. Ken Epp (Elk Island, CPC): Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point for a member to claim these privileges? Given the privileges belong of order. I would like to ask you to seek unanimous consent for the to the House of Commons, is the 40 day rule an appropriate length of following motion: time for the immunity of being a witness and from arrest, especially That notwithstanding Standing Order 105, a special committee of the House be given that the parliamentary sessions in the Canadian Parliament are appointed to prepare and bring in a bill to protect our children from further sexual typically quite lengthy? Should the fact that there is a fixed exploitation by immediately eliminating from child pornography laws all defences parliamentary calendar for the House make a difference? for possession of child pornography which allow for the exploitation of children, and that the membership of the committee be: Peter Adams, member for Peterborough, Ontario; hon. Reg Alcock, member for Winnipeg South, Manitoba; Carole-Marie The 40 day rule arose at a time when parliamentary sessions were Allard, member for Laval East, Quebec; hon. David Anderson, member for Victoria, short. The members could not really leave the capital before, during British Columbia; Mark Assad, member for Gatineau, Quebec; Sarkis Assadourian, or after a session. Should the ease of modern transportation be member for Brampton Centre, Ontario; hon. Jean Augustine, member for Etobicoke relevant? Should the 40 day rule be retained or shortened? —Lakeshore, Ontario; hon. Larry Bagnell, member for Yukon, Yukon; hon. Eleni Bakopanos, member for Ahuntsic, Quebec; hon. Sue Barnes, member for London Ï (1010) West, Ontario; Gilbert Barrette, member for Témiscamingue, Quebec; Colleen Beaumier, member for Brampton West—Mississauga, Ontario; Réginald Bélair, member for Timmins—James Bay, Ontario; hon. Mauril Bélanger, Ottawa—Vanier, Mr. Speaker, as a result of prorogation, the terms of reference to Ontario; Eugene Bellemare, member for Ottawa—Orléans, Ontario; hon. Carolyn the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs has lapsed. Bennett, member for St. Paul's, Ontario; Robert Bertrand, member for Pontiac— Since a committee cannot on its own consider a matter of privilege Gatineau—Labelle, Quebec; hon. Maurizio Bevilacqua, member for Vaughan—King without a reference from the House, I ask that you rule this to be a —Aurora, Ontario; Gérard Binet, member for Frontenac—Mégantic, Quebec; hon. Ethel Blondin-Andrew, member for Western Arctic, Northwest Territories; Raymond prima facie question of privilege to allow me to move the motion Bonin, member for Nickel Belt, Ontario, hon. Paul Bonwick, member for Simcoe— referring this matter to the Standing Committee on Procedure and Grey, Ontario; hon. Don Boudria, member for Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, House Affairs. Ontario; hon. Claudette Bradshaw, member for Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, New Brunswick; hon. Scott Brison, member for Kings—Hants, Nova Scotia; Bonnie The Speaker: I thank the hon. member for raising this matter. As Brown, member for Oakville, Ontario; John Bryden, member for Ancaster—Dundas I indicated in the previous session, this was a bona fide question of —Flamborough—Aldershot, Ontario; Sarmite Bulte, member for Parkdale—High privilege. Accordingly, in my view, the question remains a question Park, Ontario— of privilege. The committee did not completely report on the matter Ï (1015) which it is entitled to do. Accordingly I give the hon. member leave to move his motion. The Speaker: Order, please. It seems to me that the hon. member for Elk Island is seeking consent of the House to move a motion to *** strike a committee and he appears to have gone far beyond anything like normal membership of committee already, in terms of numbers. REFERENCE TO STANDING COMMITTEE ON He appears to be putting the whole House on the committee. He PROCEDURE AND HOUSE AFFAIRS could move that we go to committee of the whole, but he is not Mr. Garry Breitkreuz (Yorkton—Melville, CPC): Mr. Speaker, doing that. I move: If there is more substance to his motion rather than names, I would That the matter of the question of privilege raised on May 12 and May 16, 2003 like to hear it.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Core 1..39 Journalweekly (PRISM::Advent3b2 10.50)
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION 40e LÉGISLATURE, 3e SESSION Journals Journaux No. 2 No 2 Thursday, March 4, 2010 Le jeudi 4 mars 2010 10:00 a.m. 10 heures PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES TABLING OF DOCUMENTS DÉPÔT DE DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Conformément à l'article 32(2) du Règlement, M. Lukiwski Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Chambre Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, des communes) dépose sur le Bureau, — Réponses du pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions: gouvernement, conformément à l’article 36(8) du Règlement, aux pétitions suivantes : — Nos. 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, — nos 402-1109 to 402-1111, 402-1132, 402-1147, 402-1150, 402- 402-1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 1185, 402-1222, 402-1246, 402-1259, 402-1321, 402-1336, 402- 402-1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 and 402-1513 1379, 402-1428, 402-1485, 402-1508 et 402-1513 au sujet du concerning the Employment Insurance Program. — Sessional régime d'assurance-emploi. — Document parlementaire no 8545- Paper No. 8545-403-1-01; 403-1-01; — Nos. 402-1129, 402-1174 and 402-1268 concerning national — nos 402-1129, 402-1174 et 402-1268 au sujet des parcs parks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-2-01; nationaux. — Document parlementaire no 8545-403-2-01; — Nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Journaux Journals
    HOUSE OF COMMONS OF CANADA CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES DU CANADA 37th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION 37e LÉGISLATURE, 1re SESSION Journals Journaux No. 12 No 12 Tuesday, February 13, 2001 Le mardi 13 février 2001 10:00 a.m. 10 heures The Clerk informed the House of the unavoidable absence of the Le Greffier informe la Chambre de l’absence inévitable du Speaker. Président. Whereupon, Mr. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlotten- Sur ce, M. Kilger (Stormont — Dundas — Charlottenburgh), burgh), Deputy Speaker and Chairman of Committees of the Vice–président et président des Comités pléniers, assume la Whole, took the Chair, pursuant to subsection 43(1) of the présidence, conformément au paragraphe 43(1) de la Loi sur le Parliament of Canada Act. Parlement du Canada. PRAYERS PRIÈRE DAILY ROUTINE OF BUSINESS AFFAIRES COURANTES ORDINAIRES PRESENTING REPORTS FROM COMMITTEES PRÉSENTATION DE RAPPORTS DE COMITÉS Mr. Lee (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the M. Lee (secrétaire parlementaire du leader du gouvernement à la Government in the House of Commons), from the Standing Chambre des communes), du Comité permanent de la procédure et Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the des affaires de la Chambre, présente le 1er rapport de ce Comité, 1st Report of the Committee, which was as follows: dont voici le texte : The Committee recommends, pursuant to Standing Orders 104 Votre Comité recommande, conformément au mandat que lui and 114, that the list of members and associate members for confèrent les articles 104 et 114 du Règlement, que la liste
    [Show full text]
  • House & Senate
    HOUSE & SENATE COMMITTEES / 63 HOUSE &SENATE COMMITTEES ACCESS TO INFORMATION, PRIVACY AND Meili Faille, Vice-Chair (BQ)......................47 A complete list of all House Standing Andrew Telegdi, Vice-Chair (L)..................44 and Sub-Committees, Standing Joint ETHICS / L’ACCÈS À L’INFORMATION, DE LA PROTECTION DES RENSEIGNEMENTS Omar Alghabra, Member (L).......................38 Committees, and Senate Standing Dave Batters, Member (CON) .....................36 PERSONNELS ET DE L’ÉTHIQUE Committees. Includes the committee Barry Devolin, Member (CON)...................40 clerks, chairs, vice-chairs, and ordinary Richard Rumas, Committee Clerk Raymond Gravel, Member (BQ) .................48 committee members. Phone: 613-992-1240 FAX: 613-995-2106 Nina Grewal, Member (CON) .....................32 House of Commons Committees Tom Wappel, Chair (L)................................45 Jim Karygiannis, Member (L)......................41 Directorate Patrick Martin, Vice-Chair (NDP)...............37 Ed Komarnicki, Member (CON) .................36 Phone: 613-992-3150 David Tilson, Vice-Chair (CON).................44 Bill Siksay, Member (NDP).........................33 Sukh Dhaliwal, Member (L)........................32 FAX: 613-996-1962 Blair Wilson, Member (IND).......................33 Carole Lavallée, Member (BQ) ...................48 Senate Committees and Private Glen Pearson, Member (L) ..........................43 ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE Legislation Branch Scott Reid, Member (CON) .........................43 DEVELOPMENT / ENVIRONNEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Parliament
    Foreign Policy White Papers and the Role of Canada’s Parliament: Paradoxical But Not Without Potential Gerald J. Schmitz Principal analyst, international affairs Parliamentary Information and Research Service Library of Parliament, Ottawa Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association University of Western Ontario, London Panel on “International and Defence Policy Review” 3 June 2005 Note: This paper developed out of remarks to a conference in Quebec City in May 2004 on the subject of white-paper foreign policy management processes, and is a pre- publication draft of an article for the fall 2005 issue of Études internationales. The views expressed are the author’s alone. Please do not cite without permission. Introduction to the Paradoxical Actor on the Hill The observations that follow draw on several decades of direct experience working with that paradoxical, and sometimes overlooked, actor in the foreign policy development process, namely Canada’s Parliament. During that time concerns about the alleged weaknesses of parliamentary oversight of the executive have become a commonplace complaint. They seem also to be a staple assumption in the academic discourse on Canadian foreign policy, when the legislative role merits any mention at all. (Frequently it does not.) Yet if one believes the renewed rhetoric emanating from high places about redressing “democratic deficits” in the Canadian body politic, this was all supposed to change. At the end of 2003, a new prime minister ushering in a new management regime, or at least a different style of governing, said that he and his government were committed to changing the way things work in Ottawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan September 2001 to December 2002
    FIRST DRAFT - FOR REVIEW ACTION PLAN SEPTEMBER 2001 TO DECEMBER 2002 PRESENTED TO THE COALITION TO RENEW CANADA'S INFRASTRUCTURE (CRCI) Montréal, February 7, 2004 CURRENT GGA CONTRACT The stated current objective by the Coalition to Renew Canada's Infrastructure (CRCI) (TRIP/CANADA) to GGA Communications Inc. (GGA) is to secure federal investment into Canada's National Highway System by way of a National Highway Program. The current contract pays GGA a $7,500/month retainer fee, and runs from June to September 2001. All related expenses are included in this monthly retainer. The contract can be terminated by either party providing a one month notice of termination. For this retainer fee, the CRCI receives the following services: ! General government relations assistance. ! Access to Québec-based cabinet ministers, members of Parliament (MPs) and Senator not contacted or easily accessed before. ! Coordination and execution of a MPs meeting blitz. This blitz will target Québec based MPs at first, followed by MPs in Ontario. GGA will coordinate the attendance of local contractors, issue a news release and coordinate any other necessary details with CRCI and member associations. The CRCI has experienced success with cabinet ministers and MPs outside Québec. However, when appropriate, GGA will assist in making contact with MPs and ministers outside of Québec. ! Access to key political staff and people of influence in both circle of friends of the Prime Minister as well as the Federal Minister of Finance. ! Media relations assistance. GGA has provided the resources of Mr. Jean-René Gagnon, Senior Vice-President & Partner, Mr. Pablo Rodriguez, Vice-President & Partner and Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • 13542 DIP MAG May/June.V4
    Christina Spencer on 15 Years of Canadian Diplomacy November–December 2004 Mexican Evolution Ten Years of Free Trade Maria Teresa Garcia de Madero, Ambassador of Mexico Allan Thompson critiques the Foreign Policy Review process The trouble with Jeremy Rifkin Democracy for export: To impose or lead by example? And introducing Margaret Dickensen, gourmet goddess Nov/Dec 2004 CDN $5.95 PM 40957514 Volume 15, Number 6 PUBLISHER Our 15th anniversary issue Lezlee Cribb EDITOR Jennifer Campbell CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Table of Daniel Drolet CULTURE EDITOR Margo Roston CONTENTS COPY EDITOR Roger Bird EDITOR EMERITUS DIPLOMATICA| Bhupinder S. Liddar Happy birthday to us . .4 CONTRIBUTING WRITERS News and Culture . .5 George Abraham Roger Bird Envoy’s Photo Album . 8 Laura Bonikowsky Cleaning up the Carribean . .10 Thomas D’Aquino Diplo-dates . .11 Margaret Dickensen Recent Arrivals . .12 Joe Geurts Canadian Appointments . .14 Gurprit Kindra David Long Carlos Miranda DISPATCHES| Christina Spencer Diplomacy over this magazine’s lifespan Allan Thompson Christina Spencer looks back on 15 years . .15 Philémon Yang Dating diplomacy: A chronological countdown . 19 COVER PHOTOGRAPHY Jana Chytilova Democracy to go CONTRIBUTING ARTIST Differing diplomatic approaches to freedom . .20 Hilary Ashby The Canadian Parliamentary Centre advocates the subtle approach . .24 CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHER Sam Garcia After NAFTA OFFICE ASSISTANT Trade Winds: Mexico’s ambassador talks trade . .25 Colin Anderson NAFTA by the numbers . .27 OTTAWA ADVERTISING SALES Lezlee Cribb (613) 789-6890 DELIGHTS| NATIONAL ADVERTISING SALES Entertaining: Margaret Dickensen’s memories of the Soviet Union . .29 On the Go: Margo Roston on the sounds of a Russian symphony . .32 (613) 234-8468, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Staff: the Life and Times of Parliament’S Statutory Orphans
    MINISTERIAL STAFF: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF PARLIAMENT’S STATUTORY ORPHANS Liane E. Benoit Acknowledgements Much of the primary research in support of this paper was gathered through interviews with more than twenty former and current public servants, lobbyists, and ex-exempt staff. I am sincerely grateful to each of them for their time, their candour and their willingness to share with me the benefit of their experience and insights on this important subject. I would also like to acknowledge the generous assistance of Cathi Corbett,Chief Librarian at the Canada School of Public Service,without whose expertise my searching and sleuthing would have proven far more challenging. 145 146 VOLUME 1: PARLIAMENT,MINISTERS AND DEPUTY MINISTERS And lastly, my sincere thanks to C.E.S Franks, Professor Emeritus of the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University, for his guidance and support throughout the development of this paper and his faith that, indeed, I would someday complete it. 1 Where to Start 1.1 Introduction Of the many footfalls heard echoing through Ottawa’s corridors of power, those that often hit hardest but bear the least scrutiny belong to an elite group of young, ambitious and politically loyal operatives hired to support and advise the Ministers of the Crown. Collectively known as “exempt staff,”1 recent investigations by the Public Accounts Committee and the Commission of Inquiry into the Sponsorship Program and Advertising Activities,hereafter referred to as the “Sponsorship Inquiry”, suggest that this group of ministerial advisors can, and often do, exert a substantial degree of influence on the development,and in some cases, administration, of public policy in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CHRETIEN LEGACY Introduction .................................................. i The Chr6tien Legacy R eg W hitaker ........................................... 1 Jean Chr6tien's Quebec Legacy: Coasting Then Stickhandling Hard Robert Y oung .......................................... 31 The Urban Legacy of Jean Chr6tien Caroline Andrew ....................................... 53 Chr6tien and North America: Between Integration and Autonomy Christina Gabriel and Laura Macdonald ..................... 71 Jean Chr6tien's Continental Legacy: From Commitment to Confusion Stephen Clarkson and Erick Lachapelle ..................... 93 A Passive Internationalist: Jean Chr6tien and Canadian Foreign Policy Tom K eating ......................................... 115 Prime Minister Jean Chr6tien's Immigration Legacy: Continuity and Transformation Yasmeen Abu-Laban ................................... 133 Renewing the Relationship With Aboriginal Peoples? M ichael M urphy ....................................... 151 The Chr~tien Legacy and Women: Changing Policy Priorities With Little Cause for Celebration Alexandra Dobrowolsky ................................ 171 Le Petit Vision, Les Grands Decisions: Chr~tien's Paradoxical Record in Social Policy M ichael J. Prince ...................................... 199 The Chr~tien Non-Legacy: The Federal Role in Health Care Ten Years On ... 1993-2003 Gerard W . Boychuk .................................... 221 The Chr~tien Ethics Legacy Ian G reene ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississauga Reception
    REGIONAL RECEPTION Mississauga reception Story by Harrison Lowman, photos by Sumeeta Kohli and Susan Simms On Wednesday, February 10, the CAFP was welcomed to Mississauga City Hall by Mayor Bonnie Crombie. Attendees heard from the Mayor, the VP of the Ontario Former Members Association, David Warner and CAFP’s own Hon. Andy Mitchell. Attendees at the Mississauga gathering. Mayor Bonnie Crombie welcomes CAFP and CAFP President, Hon. Andy Mitchell at Mis- Hon. Gurbax Malhi, Hon. Andy Mitchell, the Ontario Association of Former Members of sissauga City Hall. Mayor Bonnie Crombie, John Nunziata, and Parliament to Mississauga. Terence Young. Mayor Bonnie Crombie alongside Hon. Jean Geoff Scott and Mayor Crombie. Dorothy Price, Mayor Crombie and Hon. Vim Augustine. Kochhar. Page 2 Beyond the Hill • Spring 2016 Beyond the Hill • Spring 2016 Page 3 Beyond the Hill Canadian Association of Former Parliamentarians Volume 12, Issue No. 2 Spring 2016 CONTENTS First ever global anti-corruption award goes Regional Reception in Mississauga 2 Story by Harrison Lowman, to Yemeni parliamentarian 25 photos by Sumeeta Kohli and Susan Simms By Scott Hitchcox CAFP News 4 Election Observation in Haiti 26 How the President sees it 5 By Hayley Chazan By Hon. Andy Mitchell How it works 30 Why not join the CAFP 6 By Hon. John Reid By Scott Hitchcox It seems to me 32 Association of Former Members of the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia By Dorothy Dobbie annual dinner 7 Teachers Institute on Canadian Story by Hon. David Anderson, photo by Rob Lee Parliamentary Democracy 33 Parliamentary internship gateway to By Harrison Lowman exciting careers 8 By Harrison Lowman Where are they now? 34 Provincial and National Associations’ Meeting 11 By Hayley Chazan, Scott Hitchcox By Harrison Lowman and Harrison Lowman The return of the Rhino Party 12 Book shelf: Tamboura: The eruption that By Harrison Lowman changed the world 38 New Poet Laureate named 15 By Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Canada, Official Results of the 38Th General Election – PDF Format
    2 5 3 2 a CANDIDATES ELECTED / CANDIDATS ÉLUS Se 6 ln ln A nco co C Li in R L E ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED de ELECTORAL DISTRICT PARTY ELECTED CANDIDATE ELECTED C er O T S M CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU C I bia C D um CIRCONSCRIPTION PARTI ÉLU CANDIDAT ÉLU É ol C A O N C t C A H Aler 35050 Mississauga South / Mississauga-Sud Paul John Mark Szabo N E !( e A N L T 35051 Mississauga--Streetsville Wajid Khan A S E 38th GENERAL ELECTION R B 38 ÉLECTION GÉNÉRALE C I NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR 35052 Nepean--Carleton Pierre Poilievre T A I S Q Phillip TERRE-NEUVE-ET-LABRADOR 35053 Newmarket--Aurora Belinda Stronach U H I s In June 28, 2004 E T L 28 juin, 2004 É 35054 Niagara Falls Hon. / L'hon. Rob Nicholson E - 10001 Avalon Hon. / L'hon. R. John Efford B E 35055 Niagara West--Glanbrook Dean Allison A N 10002 Bonavista--Exploits Scott Simms I Z Niagara-Ouest--Glanbrook E I L R N D 10003 Humber--St. Barbe--Baie Verte Hon. / L'hon. Gerry Byrne a 35056 Nickel Belt Raymond Bonin E A n L N 10004 Labrador Lawrence David O'Brien s 35057 Nipissing--Timiskaming Anthony Rota e N E l n e S A o d E 10005 Random--Burin--St. George's Bill Matthews E n u F D P n d ely E n Gre 35058 Northumberland--Quinte West Paul Macklin e t a s L S i U a R h A E XEL e RÉSULTATS OFFICIELS 10006 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO
    Court File No.: CV-18-00605134-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: MICKY GRANGER Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 MOTION RECORD OF THE PLAINTIFF (CERTIFICATION) (Returnable November 27 & 28, 2019) VOLUME II of II March 18, 2019 GOLDBLATT PARTNERS LLP 20 Dundas Street West, Suite 1039 Toronto ON M5G 2C2 Jody Brown LS# 58844D Tel: 416-979-4251 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Geetha Philipupillai LS# 74741S Tel.: 416-979-4252 / Fax: 416-591-7333 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Plaintiff - 2 TO: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT - OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Crown Law Office – Civil Law 720 Bay Street, 8th Floor Toronto, ON, M5G 2K1 Amy Leamen LS#: 49351R Tel: 416.326.4153 / Fax: 416.326.4181 Lawyers for the Defendant TABLE OF CONTENTS TAB DESCRIPTION PG # 1. Notice of Motion (Returnable November 27 and 28, 2019) 1 A. Appendix “A” – List of Common Issues 6 2. Affidavit of Micky Granger (Unsworn) 8 3. Affidavit of Tanya Atherfold-Desilva sworn March 18, 2019 12 A. Exhibit “A”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – 20 Systemic Review Report dated July 2016 B. Exhibit “B”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director - 126 Executive Summary and Recommendations dated July 2016 C. Exhibit “C”: Office of the Independent Police Review Director – Terms of 142 Reference as of March 2019 D. Exhibit “D”: Affidavit of David D.J. Truax sworn August 30, 2016 146 E. Exhibit “E”: Centre of Forensic Investigators & Submitters Technical 155 Information Sheets effective April 2, 2015 F.
    [Show full text]