DOCSLIB.ORG

GPO-CRECB-1993-Pt3-8-1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GPO-CRECB-1993-Pt3-8-1.Pdf 3954 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE March 3, 1993 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Wednesday, March 3, 1993 The House met at 12 noon. Dooley Kopetski Price (NC) Greenwood Manzullo Schaefer Durbin Kreidler Rahall Hancock McCandless Schiff The Chaplain, Rev. James David Edwards (CA) LaFalce Rangel Hastert McCollum Schroeder Ford, D.D., offered the following Edwards (TX) Lambert Ravenel Hefley McCrery Sensenbrenner prayer: Engel Lancaster Reed Herger McHugh Shaw We know, 0 gracious God, that there English (AZ) Lantos Reynolds Hobson McKeon Shays English (OK) LaRocco Richardson Hoekstra McMillan Shuster is much in the lives of people that is Eshoo Laughlin Rose Hoke Meyers Skeen difficult and painful, but we also know Fazio Lehman Roth Horn Mica Smith (MI) that there is joy and celebration too. Fields (LA) Levin Rowland Huffington Michel Smith (OR) We experience that which is sorrowful Filner Lewis (GA) Roybal-Allard Hunter Miller (FL) Smith (TX) Fingerhut Lipinski Rush Inhofe Molinari Snowe and frustrating, but we sense also the Fish Long Sabo Istook Moorhead Solomon presence of dignity and majesty and Flake Lowey Sanders Jacobs Morella Spence honor among people and what they do. Fo-rlietta Maloney Sangmeister Johnson (CT) Murphy Stearns Santorum Johnson, Sam Nussle Stump 0 Foley Mann We pray, loving God, that we will Frank (MA) Manton Sarpalius Kasich Oxley Sundquist walk the paths of our lives with the as­ -Frost Margolies- Sawyer Kim Packard Talent surance that Your presence is ever Furse Mezvinsky Schumer King Paxon Taylor (MS) with us, that Your power can sustain Gallo Markey Scott Kingston Petri Taylor (NC) Gejdenson Matsui Serrano Klug Porter Thomas (CA) us, and that Your peace is with us to Gephardt Mazzoli Sharp Kolbe Pryce (OH) Thomas (WY) the end of our days. Amen. Geren McCloskey Shepherd Kyl Quillen Torkildsen Gibbons McCurdy Skaggs Lazio Quinn Upton Gillmor McDermott Skelton Leach Ramstad Vucanovich Gilman McHale Slattery Levy Regula Walker THE JOURNAL Glickman Mcinnis Slaughter Lewis (CA) Ridge Walsh Gonzalez McKinney Smith (IA) Lewis (FL) Roberts Weldon The SPEAKER. The Chair has exam­ Gordon McNulty Smith (NJ) Lightfoot Rogers Wolf ined the Journal of the last day's pro­ Green Meehan Spratt Linder Rohrabacher Young (FL) Gunderson Meek Stark Livingston Ros-Lehtinen Zeliff ceedings and announces to the House Gutierrez Menendez Stenholm Machtley Royce Zimmer his approval thereof. Stokes Hall(OH) Mfume NOT VOTING--35 Pursuant to clause 1, rule I, the Jour­ Hall(TX) Mineta Strickland nal stands approved. Hamilton Minge Studds Berman Henry Roukema Hansen Mink Stupak Brown (CA) Hyde Saxton Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, pursu­ Harman Moakley Swett Byrne Jefferson Schenk ant to clause 1, rule I, I respectfully de­ Hastings Mollohan Swift Clayton Knollenberg Sisisky mand a vote on agreeing to the Speak­ Hayes Montgomery Synar Cox Lloyd Thurman er's approval of the Journal. Hefner Moran Tanner DeLay Martinez Valentine Hilliard Murtha Tauzin Dellums McDade Washington The SPEAKER. The question is on Hinchey Myers Tejeda Evans Miller (CA) Whitten the Chair's approval of the Journal. Hoagland Nadler Thornton Fields (TX) Payne (VA) Williams The question was taken; and the Hochbrueckner Natcher Torres Ford (MI) Pomeroy Wynn Holden Neal (MA) Torricelli Ford (TN) Roemer Young (AK) Speaker announced that the noes ap­ Houghton Neal (NC) Towns Hamburg Rostenkowski peared to have it. Hoyer Oberstar Traficant Mr. SOLOMON. Mr. Speaker, I object Hughes Obey Tucker 0 1225 Hutchinson Olver Unsoeld to the vote on the ground that a Hutto Ortiz Velazquez So the Journal was approved. quorum is not present and make the Inglis Orton Vento The result of the vote was announced point of order that a quorum is not Inslee Owens Visclosky as above recorded. present. Johnson (GA) Pallone Volkmer Johnson (SD) Parker Waters The SPEAKER. Evidently, a quorum Johnson, E. B. Pastor Watt is not present. Johnston Payne (NJ) Waxman PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Sergeant at Arms will notify ab­ Kanjorski Pelosi Wheat Kaptur Penny Wilson The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. sent Members. Kennedy Peterson (FL) Wise MONTGOMERY). Will the gentleman The vote was taken by electronic de­ Kennelly Peterson (MN) Woolsey from Indiana [Mr. McCLOSKEY] please vice, and there were-yeas 246, nays Kildee Pickett Wyden come forward and lead the House in the 150, not voting 35, as follows: Kleczka Pickle Yates Klein Pombo Pledge of Allegiance? [Roll No. 49] Klink Poshard Mr. McCLOSKEY led the Pledge of YEAS-246 Allegiance as follows: NAYS-150 Abercrombie Bonior Combest I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the Ackerman Borski Condit Allard Burton Duncan United States of America, and to the Repub­ Andrews (ME) Boucher Conyers Armey Buyer Dunn lic for which it stands, one nation under God, Andrews (NJ) Brewster Cooper Bachus (AL) Callahan Emerson Andrews (TX) Brooks Coppersmith Baker (CA) Calvert Everett indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Applegate Browder Costello Baker (LA) Camp Ewing Archer Brown (FL) Coyne Ballenger Canady Fa well Bacchus (FL) Brown (OH) Cramer Barrett (NE) Castle Fowler MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE Baesler Bryant Danner Bartlett Clay Franks (CT) Barcia Cantwell Darden Barton Coble Franks (NJ) A message from the Senate by Mr. Barlow Cardin de Ia Garza Bentley Collins (GA) Gallegly Hallen, one of its clerks, announced Barrett (WI) Carr Deal Bereuter Crane Gekas Bateman Chapman DeFazio Bilirakis Crapo Gilchrest that the Senate had passed a concur­ Becerra Clement DeLauro Bliley Cunningham Gingrich rent resolution of the following title, Beilenson Clinger Derrick Blute Diaz-Balart Goodlatte in which the concurrence of the House Bevill Clyburn Deutsch Boehlert Dickey Goodling is requested: Bilbray Coleman Dicks Boehner Doolittle Goss Bishop Collins (IL) Dingell Bonilla Dornan Grams S. Con. Res. 12. Concurrent resolution to Blackwell Collins (Ml) Dixon Bunning Dreier Grandy recognize the heroic sacrifice of the Special OThis symbol represents the time of day during the House proceedings, e.g., 0 1407 is 2:07 p.m. Matter set in this typeface indicates words inserted or appended, rather than spoken, by a Member of the House on the floor. March 3, 1993 CONGRESSIONAL RECQRD-HOUSE 3955 Agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco Chair, on behalf of the President pro into action more than 230 times, with­ and Firearms in Waco, TX. tempore and upon the recommendation out loss of life, in the process of bring­ The message also announced that of the chairman of the Committee on ing to justice many vicious criminals. pursuant to Public Law 1{}2-392, the Finance, appoints the following mem­ Last year, also, investigations by Chair, on behalf of the Republican bers of the Finance Committee as con­ ATF's small force of 2,200 agents leader, announces his appointment of gressional advisers on trade policy and caused charges to be brought against Mr. STEVENS, to the Commission on the negotiations and as official advisers to more than 13,000 bombers, arsonists, Bicentennial of the U.S. Capitol. the U.S. delegations to international gun runners, dope dealers, and other The message also announced that conferences, meetings, and negotiation dangerous offenders. pursuant to section 4355(a), of title 10, sessions relating to trade agreements: We aspire to build a peaceful demo­ United States Code, the Chair, on be­ Mr. MOYNIHAN, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BOREN, cratic Nation. But so long as some peo­ half of the Vice President, appoints Mr. Mr. PACKWOOD, Mr. DOLE; and as alter­ ple choose violence over law and order, REID, from the Committee on Appro­ nate official advisers: Mr. BRADLEY, our Nation shall require the services of priations, and Mr. SHELBY, from the Mr. MITCHELL, Mr. PRYOR, Mr. RIEGLE, peace officers, including those of the Committee on Armed Services, to the Mr. ROCKEFELLER, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Fire­ Board of Visitors of the U.S. Military BREAUX, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. ROTH, Mr. arms. I join with other citizens in com­ Academy. DANFORTH, Mr. CHAFEE, Mr. DUREN­ mending the courage of the valiant The message also announced that BERGER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. HATCH, and ATF special agents, and their fellow pursuant to section 6968(a), of title 10, Mr. WALLOP. peace officers throughout America, United States Code, the Chair, on be­ who face death and injury every day to half of the Vice President, appoints Ms. keep our Nation safe. We grieve for the MIKULSKI, from the Committee on Ap­ ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO agents who died in the line of duty. We propriations, and Mr. SARBANES, at COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET hurt with the agents injured in doing large, to the Board of Visitors of the Mr. HOYER. Mr. Speaker, by direc­ their duty. We extend our heartfelt U.S. Naval Academy. tion of the Democrat caucus, I offer a sympathy and our total support to The message also announced that privileged resolution (H. Res. 110) and their families. pursuant to section 1295(b), of title 46, ask for its immediate consideration. United States Code, as amended by The Clerk read the resolution, as fol­ Public Law 101-595, the Chair, on behalf lows: of the Vice President, appoints Mr. H. RES. 110 CHANGE HOLLINGS, ex officio, and Mr. BREAUX, Resolved, That the following named Mem­ (Mr. HUNTER asked and was given from the Committee on Commerce, bers, be, and they are hereby, elected to the permission to address the House for 1 Science, and Transportation, to the following standing committee of the House minute and to revise and extend his re­ Board of Visitors of the U.S. Merchant of Representatives: Committee on the Budg­ marks.) Marine Academy. et: Glen Browder of Alabama; Lynn C. Wool­ Mr. HUNTER. Mr. Speaker, all of the The message also announced that sey of California. Members on this side of the aisle also . pursuant to Public Law 102- 392, the The resolution was agreed to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FISCAL YEAR 2021 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION —And— PERFORMANCE BUDGET GOALS
    FISCAL YEAR 2021 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET JUSTIFICATION —and— PERFORMANCE BUDGET GOALS U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 www.osc.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Summary of Request 5 Appropriations Language 8 About the Office of Special Counsel 8 OSC’s Docket 8 Strategic Goals 11 OSC’s Efficiencies and Successes 11 OSC’s Internal Organization 13 Components of Budget Request 15 Budget by Program 16 PART 2 – FY 2021 BUDGET REQUEST – ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 17 FY 2021 Budget Request by Budget Object Class 17 Analysis of Resources Table 19 PART 3 – BUDGET PROGRAMS AND PERFORMANCE PLAN 20 FY 2019 Case Activity and Results – All Programs 20 Investigation and Prosecution of Prohibited Personnel Practices 21 USERRA 27 Alternative Dispute Resolution 30 Whistleblower Disclosure Program 32 Hatch Act 36 OSC’s Diversity, Outreach and Training Program 40 PART 4 – ENHANCEMENT OF OPERATIONS 42 Strategic Management of Human Capital 42 Improved Financial Performance 42 Competitive Sourcing 43 Maximizing Efficiencies through use of Shared Service Providers 43 IT Modernization Initiatives 44 IT Goals for FY 2020 – FY 2021 45 Improving Employee Satisfaction and Wellness 45 Telework Initiative 45 Continuity of Operations 46 Risk Management and Program Evaluation 46 APPENDICES 47 Appendix A: Statutory Background 47 Appendix B: Strategic Plan – FY 2017 to FY 2022 49 Appendix C: Goal Tables for New Strategic Plan 63 Appendix D: OSC Organizational Chart 77 U.S. Office of Special Counsel FY 2021 Congressional Budget Justification Page 2 PART 1 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) acts as the premier channel for whistleblowers and federal workers seeking redress for violations of their civil service protections, as well as safeguards the nonpartisan ethos at the core of the federal workforce.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT to CONGRESS —For— FISCAL YEAR 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS —for— FISCAL YEAR 2018 U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 218 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 www.osc.gov U.S. OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL 1730 M Street, N.W., Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20036-4505 The Special Counsel The Honorable Michael R. Pence President of the Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy P. Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Mr. President and Madame Speaker: I respectfully submit the Report to Congress for fiscal year 2018 from the U.S. Office of Special Counsel. A copy of this report will also be posted on our website. Sincerely, Henry J. Kerner TABLE OF CONTENTS The Special Counsel 5 A Message from the Special Counsel 6 Part 1: Introduction to OSC 8 Statutory Background 8 Mission 9 Part 2: Overview of Operations 10 Internal Organization 10 FY 2018 Budget and Staffing 12 FY 2018 Case Activity and Results 12 Part 3: Prohibited Personnel Practice Complaints 14 Summary of Workload, Activity, and Results 14 Receipts and Investigations 14 Performance Highlights 16 Amicus Curiae Briefs 17 Cases resolved by an Agreement 18 Prohibited Personnel Practice Successes 19 Part 4: Whistleblower Disclosures 26 Overview 26 Disclosure Successes 26 Part 5: Hatch Act 32 Overview 32 Advisory Opinions 32 Hatch Act Unit Successes 32 Part 6: USERRA Enforcement Program 35 Overview 35 USERRA Successes 35 Part 7: Diversity, Outreach & Training 37 Diversity, Outreach and Training Program 37 Annual Survey Program 38 Further Information 39 Prohibited Personnel
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Dod Political Activity Public
    UNCLASSIFIED/FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Subject: 2016 DoD Public Affairs Guidance for Political Campaigns and Elections 1. References. a. DoDI 5405.3, Development of Proposed Public Affairs Guidance (PPAG) b. 2012 DoD Public Affairs Guidance for Political Campaigns and Elections c. DoDD 1344.10, Political Activities by Members of the Armed Forces d. 5 U.S.C, Sec. 7321-7326, The Hatch Act of 1939, as amended in 1993 e. 5 C.F.R. Parts 733-734, Political Activities of Federal Employees f. DoDD 5230.09, Clearance of DoD Information for Public Release g. DoDI 5120.4, DoD Newspapers, Magazines and Civilian Enterprise Publications h. DoDI 1100.13, Surveys of DoD Personnel i. DoDI 5120.20, American Forces Radio and Television Service (AFRTS) j. DoDR 5120.20-R, Management and Operation of AFRTS k. DoDI 1334.1, Wearing of the Uniform l. AFI 36-2903, Dress and Personal Appearance of Air Force Personnel m. AR 670-1, Wear And Appearance of Army Uniforms And Insignia n. NAVPERS 15665I, United States Navy Uniform Regulations o. MCO P1020.34G, Marine Corps Uniform Regulations p. DoDD 5410.18, Public Affairs Community Relations Policy q. DoDI 5410.19, Public Affairs Community Relations Policy Implementation r. DoDI 1000.04, Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) s. 2016-2017 Voting Assistance Guide t. U.S Office of Special Counsel, Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Social Media and the Hatch Act, dated April 4, 2012 (supersedes social media advisory, dated August 10, 2010) u. Internal Revenue Code v. 18 U.S.C. 609, Use of military authority to influence vote of member of Armed Forces 2.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Santa Cruz UC Santa Cruz Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Voice v. Vote: The Supreme Court's Paradox of Political Participation in American Liberalism Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0gn799zf Author Snickars, Eric Stephen Publication Date 2015 License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ VOICE V. VOTE: THE SUPREME COURT'S PARADOX OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN AMERICAN LIBERALISM A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in POLITICS by Eric Stephen Snickars September 2015 The dissertation of Eric Stephen Snickars is approved: __________________________________ Professor Daniel Wirls, chair __________________________________ Professor Eva C. Bertram __________________________________ Professor Mark Fathi Massoud ____________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Eric Stephen Snickars 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE – Liberalism, The Supreme Court, And The Paradox Of Political Participation In U.S. Election Law ..............................................................1 CHAPTER TWO – Liberty vs. Equality On The Supreme Court: The Conundrum Of Election Law Jurisprudence ..........................................................30 CHAPTER THREE – From Good Governance To Corporate Expression: The Road To Citizens United v. FEC ................................................................................69
    [Show full text]
  • The Right to Vote Gillette, William
    The Right to Vote Gillette, William Published by Johns Hopkins University Press Gillette, William. The Right to Vote: Politics and the Passage of the Fifteenth Amendment. Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965. Project MUSE. doi:10.1353/book.67838. https://muse.jhu.edu/. For additional information about this book https://muse.jhu.edu/book/67838 [ Access provided at 2 Oct 2021 07:45 GMT with no institutional affiliation ] This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. HOPKINS OPEN PUBLISHING ENCORE EDITIONS William Gillette The Right to Vote Politics and the Passage of the Fifteenth Amendment Open access edition supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities / Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book Program. © 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press Published 2019 Johns Hopkins University Press 2715 North Charles Street Baltimore, Maryland 21218-4363 www.press.jhu.edu The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. CC BY-NC-ND ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3235-9 (open access) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3235-8 (open access) ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3234-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3234-X (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-1-4214-3236-6 (electronic) ISBN-10: 1-4214-3236-6 (electronic) This page supersedes the copyright page included in the original publication of this work. THE RIGHT TO VOTE: POLITICS AND THE PASSAGE OF THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT One of a number of lithographs printed to commemorate the passage of the Fifteenth Amendment and reprinted here by courtesy of the Library of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Campaign and State
    Separation of Campaign and State Bradley A. Smith* ABSTRACT In a pair of recent decisions, Davis v. FEC and Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett, the Supreme Court has struck down on First Amendment grounds laws that would have arguably created more, not less speech. The federal statute at issue in Davis actually raised contribu- tion limits for certain candidates being outspent from the personal resources of wealthy opponents; the state law in Arizona Free Enterprise Club provided for state subsidies to candidates being outspent by their opponents and inde- pendent spenders. The Court’s opinions in these cases, taken on their own terms, are unsat- isfying. The Court correctly recognizes the deeply troubling nature of the gov- ernment policies at issue in Davis and Arizona Free Enterprise Club, which involved the government in favoring certain candidates over others, but it has not successfully articulated why those policies are offensive to the First Amendment, given that each law provides more resources for a candidate to speak. This Article argues that the Court’s opinions show only an inchoate rec- ognition of the core problem. Government involvement in regulating and es- pecially in subsidizing candidate speech inherently entangles government in campaigns in a manner incompatible with core American assumptions about democracy, in much the same way that direct subsidies to churches violate the First Amendment’s religion clauses even if made available to all religions. The Roberts Court, however, is trapped by its refusal to challenge prece- dents allowing government subsidies of campaigns and wrongly confusing the government’s authority to regulate the “time, place and manner” of elections under Article I, Section 4 of the Constitution as the authority to regulate politi- cal speech and campaigns.
    [Show full text]
  • NSA-FOIACASELOG-2016.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 100503A 4 April 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This responds to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated 1 January 2017 which was received by this office on 2 January 2017, for "a copy of the FOIA case log for calendar year 2016." For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. Since processing fees were minimal, no fees were assessed. Your request has been processed under the FOIA, and the logs for calendar year 2016 are enclosed, along with a FOIA Case Dispositions reference sheet that explains the final case dispositions. Please be advised that the logs do not contain the number of pages released. They contain a final disposition if the case was closed at the time the logs were created. If there is no final disposition, the case was still pending at the time the logs were created. Certain information has been deleted from the enclosures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Anti-Communism on the Development of Marxist Historical Analysis Within the Historical Profession of the United States, 1940-1960
    BUILDING THE ABSENT ARGUMENT: THE IMPACT OF ANTI-COMMUNISM ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF MARXIST HISTORICAL ANALYSIS WITHIN THE HISTORICAL PROFESSION OF THE UNITED STATES, 1940-1960 Gary Cirelli A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2010 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Don K. Rowney Dr. Timothy Messer-Kruse © 2010 Gary Cirelli All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Dr. Douglas Forsyth, Advisor This study poses the question as to why Marxism never developed in the United States as a method of historical analysis until the mid-1960s. In this regard, the only publication attempting to fully address this question was Ian Tyrrell’s book The Absent Marx: Class Analysis and Liberal History in Twentieth-Century America, in which he argued that the lack of Marxist historical analysis is only understood after one examines the internal development of the profession. This internalist argument is incomplete, however, because it downplays the important impact external factors could have had on the development of Marxism within the profession. Keeping this in mind, the purpose of this study is to construct a new argument that takes into account both the internal and external pressures faced by historians practicing Marxism preceding the 1960s. With Tyrrell as a launching pad, it first uses extensive secondary source material in order to construct a framework that takes into account the political and social climate prior to 1960. Highlighting the fact that Marxism was synonymous with Communism in the minds of many, it then examines the ways in which the government tried to suppress Communism and the impact this had on the academy.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide with Readings American Government BRIEF VERSION SEVENTH EDITION
    Study Guide with Readings American Government BRIEF VERSION SEVENTH EDITION James Q. Wilson Kyle Smith Western Texas College HOUGHTON MIFFLIN COMPANY BOSTON NEW YORK Sponsoring Editor: Katherine Meisenheimer Editorial Assistant: Kristen Craib Manufacturing Coordinator: Marketing Manager: Nicola Poser Editor in Chief: Charles Hartford Copyright © 2005 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Houghton Mifflin Company unless such copying is expressly permitted by federal copyright law. Address inquiries to College Permissions, Houghton Mifflin Company, 222 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116-3764. Printed in the U.S.A. CONTENTS TO THE STUDENT ................................................................................................................................... V CHAPTER 1 - WHAT SHOULD WE KNOW ABOUT AMERICAN GOVERNMENT?................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 - THE CONSTITUTION..................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 3 - CIVIL LIBERTIES AND CIVIL RIGHTS ........................................................................... 31 PART ONE/CLASSIC STATEMENT................................................................................................ 53 CHAPTER 4 - FEDERALISM...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Senator Carl Hatch and the Hatch Act of 1939
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 48 Number 2 Article 4 4-1-1973 Senator Carl Hatch and the Hatch Act of 1939 David Porter Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Porter, David. "Senator Carl Hatch and the Hatch Act of 1939." New Mexico Historical Review 48, 2 (2021). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol48/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. 151 SENATOR CARL HATCH AND THE HATCH ACT OF1939 DAVID PORTER THE HATCH ACT of 1939, which regulated the political ac­ tivities of Federal officials, has evoked considerable comment and controversy. Thirty-three years later, in fact, a Federal Court questioned the constitutionality of the measure. Surprisingly, historians have not devoted entire works Of many chapters to the original Hatch Act/ They have viewed the Act as a political struggle between Conservatives and President Roosevelt, but have devoted relatively little attention· to the sponsor of the proposal. 2 Reform Democratic Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico played a paramount role in promoting and securing approval of one of the first legislative efforts to control modem government bureaucracy. Hatch carne from a moderate socia-economic background. The son of a country hardware merchant, Hatch was born in Kirwin, Kansas, in November 1889, and attended public schools there and in Eldorado, Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hatch Act Modernization Act: Putting the Government Back in Politics, 42 Fordham Urb
    Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 42 Number 3 Colloquium - Financing and Fairness: Article 6 Implementation and Equity in the Urban Charter School April 2016 The aH tch Act Modernization Act: Putting the Government Back in Politics Shannon D. Azzaro Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Election Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Legislation Commons Recommended Citation Shannon D. Azzaro, The Hatch Act Modernization Act: Putting the Government Back in Politics, 42 Fordham Urb. L.J. 781 (2015). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol42/iss3/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HATCH ACT MODERNIZATION ACT: PUTTING THE GOVERNMENT BACK IN POLITICS Shannon D. Azzaro* Introduction ............................................................................................. 782 I. Federal Regulation of the Political Activities of Government Employees ......................................................................................... 787 A. The Pendleton Act of 1883 .................................................. 788 B. The Hatch Act’s Prohibitions and Procedures .................. 790 1. Effects on Federal Employees ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE of REPRESENTATIVES-Monday, April 17, 1989
    6760 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE April 17, 1989 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES-Monday, April 17, 1989 The House met at 12 noon and was H.R. 1750. An act to implement the bipar- Mr. Speaker, let us be fair, not parti- called to order by the Speaker pro tisan accord on Central America of March san, mean spirited, or hysterical. tempore [Mr. FOLEY]. 24, 1989. COMMUNICATION FROM THE INTRODUCTION OF RESOLUTION DESIGNATION OF SPEAKER PRO CLERK OF THE HOUSE TO ALLOW A NATIONAL PLEBI­ TEMPORE SCITE IN CUBA The SPEAKER pro tempore laid The SPEAKER pro tempore laid <Mr. DOUGLAS asked and was given before the House the following com- before the House the following com­ permission to address the House for 1 munication from the Speaker: munication from the Clerk of the House of Representatives: minute and to revise and extend his WASHINGTON, DC, WASHINGTON, DC, remarks.) April 17, 1989. April 14, 1989. Mr. DOUGLAS. Mr. Speaker, in Jan­ I hereby designate the Honorable THOMAS Hon. JIM WRIGHT, uary, Cuban dictator Fidel Castro S. FOLEY to act as Speaker pro tempore on marked his 30th year in power. At no today. The Speaker, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. time have the Cuban people ever been JIM WRIGHT, DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Pursuant to the per­ Speaker of the House of Representatives. allowed to express their will through a mission granted in clause 5 of rule III of the free and open vote. With the recent Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, overthrow of General Stroessner of the Clerk received at 9:54 a.m.
    [Show full text]