SPECIES RESTITUTION – A WAY TO IMPROVE FLORISTIC DIVERSITY OF MEADOW COMMUNITIES IN „SKARPA URSYNOWSKA” NATURE RESERVE ()

Maria JANICKA1*, Bogumiła PAWLUŚKIEWICZ2 1Department of Agronomy, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Poland 2Department of Environmental Improvement, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Poland *Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

The landscape reserve „Skarpa Ursynowska” is one of the 12 nature reserves situated in Warsaw (Poland). It was created in 1996 to protect piece of the high Vistula escarpment along with meadows and peat bogs of high natural values, which are located at the foot of Vistula escarpment. Cessation of management (from 1998 year) and the neglected, non-functioning drainage system for many years, as well as the storm canal banks covered with the concrete, have contributed to changes in habitat conditions and in botanical composition of post-marsh meadow communities. Floristic impoverishment of meadow communities, development of herbaceous (mainly willow) communities and invasive, arable land weeds and ruderal were demonstrated. These communities were characterized by small natural values, which reduced the aesthetic and landscape value of the reserve. The inadequate protection status of the meadow communities of the “Skarpa Ursynowska” reserve obliges to take action to stop the above mentioned processes and to restore the multi- meadow communities. For this purpose, seedlings of wild flowers, dicotyledonous species (grown in laboratory conditions from seeds obtained from natural sites) were planted. The studies were carried out during 2015–2016. The growth and development of plants, the condition and range of the populations and the threats of 22 plant species were determined. It was found that most populations of species from drier habitats survived and unsuccessful were especially species with higher water requirements. On that basis, further protective measures were established.

Keywords: Restitution of meadow species, wild flowers, post-marsh meadow, „Skarpa Ursynowska” nature reserve, Poland.

Introduction

The flora of the meadows and pastures is one of the most endangered elements of the vegetation. The impoverishment of the floristic diversity is being observed in the whole world, in various types of grassland communities (Pärtel et al., 2005). The threat to the Polish flora, although lesser than in Western Europe, increases rapidly (Trąba et al., 2006; Warda and Kozłowski, 2012; Kucharski, 2015). The community of floristic-rich “lowland hay meadows” Arrhenatherion elatioris (6510-1), for example, becomes more and more sparse. It is typical for the areas outside the rivers’ floods, on the eutrophic and mesotrophic habitats, not especially humid or dry. Thanks to colourfully flowering plants these meadows belong to the most decorative elements of the landscape (Kozłowski, 2002). The most important reasons of the decreasing in floristic diversity of the meadows are the habitats’ fragmentation and their degradation, caused mainly by the irrational human activity (Plantureux et al., 2005; Winter et al., 2008). More than 1/3 of the threatened species in Poland dies because of too small ranges of the local plant populations (Falińska, 2004). The excessive drying of the habitats, especially on the organic soils, influences the intensification of the decomposition

1800

process, the mineralisation of organic substance and the decreasing in physicoaquatic properties of the soils (Kozłowska, 2005). These changes are progressed due the abandonment of management, what causes negative changes in the species composition of the meadow communities (Zarzycki and Misztal, 2010; Sienkiewicz-Paderewska et al., 2012; Janicka et al., 2016). It is being evaluated that the half of grassland in Poland is neglected or degraded, and the part – excluded from use. The improvement of the floristic diversity of the meadows’ communities requires the active protection and the restoration of the flora. The choice of the method depends on the species, the restoration area and financial possibilities (Hedberg and Kotowski, 2010; Scotton et al., 2012). The seedlings’ production and planting is the best method of the rare and threatened species’ introduction, which dispersal is limited, and the species of low light, nutrients and water-competition, what effects the low survivability of the seedlings and young plants in the presence of primary sward (Walker et al., 2004; Wallin et al., 2009). The aim of the studies was the evaluation of the possibilities of increasing in meadow communities’ floristic diversity as the result of species introduction to the impoverished meadow-patches dominated by Arrenatherum elatius in the landscape reserve “Skarpa Ursynowska” and the restoration of its environmental values, basically the landscape and aesthetical functions.

Material and methods

The study area. The landscape reserve “Ursynowska Slope” is one of the twelve natural reserves in Warsaw (Poland). It was established in 1996 to protect the part of the high Vistula Slope (the highness of the slope in the reserve area – 5-18 metres, gradient 24-600) with the meadows and peatlands of high natural value at its background (20,8 ha, the insulation cover 155,35 ha) (The Edict, 1996; 2011). That area is the part of Warsaw Area of the Protected Landscape (The Edict, 2007). It is characterised by the presence of 126 taxa of the vascular plants, including Dryopteris cristata, the threatened species (Category V according to Zarzycki et al., 2002) (Wysocki and Budzikowski, 1996; Grabowska, 2016). Amongst the mycobiota three species from The Red Book of Polish Plants and Fungi are being noticed (Snopek 2016). The reserve serves as the migration corridor, provides the nesting or breeding sites for the amphibians, birds and mammals. It is the refuge for the invertebrates with many rare species, including daylight butterflies, such as Lycaena dispar, Polyommatus bellagrus and Cupido argiades (Kozłowski and Sielezniew, 1996; Snopek, 2016). The meadow site covers 12 quarters (10.7 ha). It was drained and managed in the years 1952- 1953. In the seventies and eighties of XX century the intensive pasture-meadow management was carried out on that area. After the system transformation the management was limited to the one, summer cut. Since 1998 the meadow communities are not being mowed. The water conditions are being shaped with constant groundwater inflow from under the slope and frequent surface runoff. As the result the low peats on the loose sands were developed (Pawłat et al., 1996). On the majority of the meadow area the muck soils, subtype peaty-muck (30-40 centimetres of muck layer) with strongly decomposed peat (25-50 centimetres) are present. Below the sandy formations and locally gyttja occur. The soils in the root layer characterise themselves by very large amounts of phosphorus (more than 1050 mg P∙kg-1 d.m. of the soil), very small amounts of potassium (85-228 mg K∙kg-1 d.m. of the soil) and pH in the range from 5.5 to 6.8 (Janicka et al., 2016). The groundwater level maintains during the vegetation period at 60-90 (120) cm. The surveys were carried out in the years 2015-2016. The vegetation period in 2015 was unusually warm and dry, the Vinczeffy hydrothermic index was equal only to 0.091 mmC-1. The July, August and September were described as extremely dry (Vinczeffy, 1984). The winter period 2015/2016 characterised itself by low temperatures and the lack of snow

1801

coverage. In 2016 the summer was not such hot as in 2015 and the hottest month was June. The water supply for the plants was generally good. The methods. In the spring of 2015 (after the previous cutting of sward) twenty two native plant species were introduced to the Arrhenatherion elatioris community (Tab.1). The diasporas were collected on the meadows of PLH 140016 protection area near Mniszew (Kozienice county, Mazovian voivodeship) in 2014. The seedlings from the laboratory were planted in the northern part of the reserve (geographical coordinates 52o16’ N; 21o05 E). The following parameters were being determined: (1) the plants’ growth and development – once a month the heights were measured, in three points on the diagonal of the area covered by peculiar species and the developing phase was determined, (2) the community range (in cm2), (3) the community condition in the 5-points scale: very poor condition, more than 80% of the plants wither or yellow, poor condition, 50-80% of the plants wither or yellow, average condition, 30-50% of the plants wither or yellow, good condition, 5-30% of the plants wither or yellow, very good condition, plants brightly green, traces of withering or yellowing. The results were analysed statistically with use of the variance analyses (ANOVA) and the Tukey test with significance level 0.05.

Table 1. The characteristics of the plant species planted in the reserve “Ursynowska Slope” Species* Family Life Dura- Plant Height form bility no. (cm)

1 Achillea millefolium L. Asteraceae H B 48 21.6 2 Allium angulosum L. Amaryllidaceae G B 13 24.4

3 Armeria maritima (MILL.) WILLD. Plumbaginaceae H B 33 5.6 4 Artemisia campestris L. Asteraceae C B, S 17 12.3 5 Centaurea stoebe L. Asteraceae H B, D 22 14.6

6 Cnidium dubium (SCHKUHR) THELL. Apiaceae H B 1 25 7 Dianthus deltoides L. Caryophyllaceae C B 14 10.8 8 Eryngium planum L. Apiaceae H B 27 11.2 9 Galium boreale L. Rubiaceae H B 17 44.8 10 Hypericum perforatum L. Hypericaceae H B 25 14 11 Inula britannica L. Asteraceae H B 7 2.7 12 Lysimachia vulgaris L. Primulaceae H B 48 17.7 13 Lythrum salicaria L. Lythraceae H B 9 49 14 Plantago lanceolata L. Plantaginaceae H B 17 22.9

15 Potentilla erecta (L.) RAEUSCH. Rosaceae H B 42 7.9 16 Rumex acetosa L. Polygonaceae H B 9 14.9 17 Sanguisorba officinalis L. Rosaceae H B 1 22.2 18 Scabiosa ochroleuca L. Dipsacaceae H B, D 22 14.1 19 flavum L. H B 23 4.5 20 Tragopogon pratensis L. Asteraceae H D 42 27.1 21 Verbascum thapsus L. Scrophulariaceae H D 5 9 22 Veronica longifolia L. Plantaginaceae H B 36 17.9 Life form: H – hemicryptophyte, G – geophyte, C – herbaceous chamaephyte, Durability: B – perennial, D – biennial plant, S – subshrub Historical-geographic group: Ap – apophytes, M – metaphytes *The nomenclature of the species according to Mirek et al. (2002).

1802

Results and Discussion

In the literature dedicated to the aim of the study the risk of meadows’ disappearing in the “Ursynowska Slope” reserve due to secondary succession connected with the lack of regular use was considered many times (Wysocki and Budzikowski, 1996; Rutkowska et al., 1999; Janicka, 2000; Janicka and Kwiecień, 2004; Grabowska, 2016). The environmental evaluation of the Arrenatherion elatioris communities, carried out in the years 2013-2015, shown the significant dumbing down of the species composition of the meadow communities, the development of the Filipendulo-Petasition communities and the invasive, segetal and ruderal plants. These communities are characterized by low natural values, what is being denoted by the low values of Shannon-Wiener coefficient (0.34-0.95) and the natural valorisation index (1.8-2.1) (Janicka et al., 2016). The significant share of Urtica dioica, dominating on 1/3 of non-forest communities’ area, impacts the decreasing the aesthetic and landscape values of the reserve. Furthermore, that species indicates the mineralisation of the organic substrate and permanent drying and softening of the outer layer of the soil. The condition of the meadow communities in the reserve is the result of abandonment of management and neglected, non- functional for many years reclamation system and the covering with concrete the banks of the storm channel. The improper state of these communities protection obliges to perform the activities up to stop of the sward degradation processes. Twenty two species of wild flowers were introduced for that purpose. The hierarchic data clustering for two estimated parameters (the range and conditions of the community) of the introduced species made possible to set apart two basic groups of different probability level (Fig.1). In the first one the fast developing and systematically increasing their ranges species, which may be used for the introduction to the reserve area, were placed. Four of them should be distinguished: Achillea millefolium, Veronica longifolia, Dianthus deltoides and Inula britannica. These species underwent the unfavourable weather conditions as well as the competition of the old sward vegetation. The ranges of their communities in the second year of the surveys were about 4-10 times larger than in the previous year (Tab.2). Additionally, four species (Tragopogon pratensis, Verbascum thapsus, Centaurea stoebe and Plantago lanceolata), which communities developed rapidly and were characterised by the widest ranges in the first year, but the next year, after forming the flower buds and setting up the seeds, died out or their ranges decreased significantly, were included to that group. The prime three of the mentioned species are biennial, well tolerated the droughts. They may develop successfully in the following years from the seeds of the soil seed bank. Plantago lanceolata, on the other hand, is the low, rosette species, shade-sensitive species. It was present in the reserve area in the former period, when the sward was partially grazed. Introducing that species, one has to remember about systematic sward cutting-off. In the second, assigned with the use of data clustering method, group of the species the ones characterized by poor development after planting and quick coming out of the sward, were placed. The following four shown poor conditions in the short time after planting: Armeria maritima, Lythrum salicaria, Sanguisorba officinalis and Thalictrum flavum (Tab.2). The strong drying out of the habitat, long-lasting summer drought in 2015 or too strong competition of the primeval sward species could be the reasons of their elimination. The disappearance of Armeria maritima was the effect of serious harms of the leaves, caused by the birds. It is worth stressing that from the species mentioned above Sanguisorba officinalis and Lythrum salicaria were present before in the reserve area, but they cannot be recommended at present habitat conditions.

1803

Fig. 1. The dendrogram and the groups of the species of similar range and community condition (the average from the study period). The numbers of the species are in accordance with the ones in the tables.

Table 2. The state of the populations of planted species during first two years of the vegetation (September 2015 and 2016) No Species Height Range Condition (cm) (cm2) (scale 5o) 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 1 Achillea millefolium L. 29.0 87.7 1085 4116 4.8 5.0 2 Allium angulosum L. 9.0 - - - 4.0 - 3 Armeria maritima (Mill.) Willd. - - - - 2.0 - 4 Artemisia campestris L. 18.3 * 485 192 4.0 3.1 5 Centaurea stoebe L. 26.3 62.0 2421 217 4.6 3.4 6 Cnidium dubium (Schkuhr) 6.3 47.0 - - 4.0 4.2 Thell. 7 Dianthus deltoides L. 16.5 32.0 637 3500 5.0 4.3 8 Eryngium planum L. 12.7 * 576 332 3.5 2.2 9 Galium boreale L. 8.0 43.0 - - 3.5 4.7 10 Hypericum perforatum L. 19.0 60.7 - 387 4.4 5.0 11 Inula britannica L. 11.0 27.0 312 3249 5.0 4.5 12 Lysimachia vulgaris L. 15.7 34.5 - 1471 2.5 3.8 13 Lythrum salicaria L. - - - - 1.7 - 14 Plantago lanceolata L. 26.7 42.3 2050 276 4.9 4.7 15 Potentilla erecta (L.) Raeusch. 12.0 20.0 393 - 4.0 2.7 16 Rumex acetosa L. 18.0 34.0 1155 576 3.2 2.8 17 Sanguisorba officinalis L. - - - - 1.8 - 18 Scabiosa ochroleuca L. 16.7 79.7 360 447 4.5 4.4 19 Thalictrum flavum L. 8.0 - - - 1.7 - 20 Tragopogon pratensis L. 36.7 66.7 1543 614.0 4.4 3.5 21 Verbascum thapsus L. 27.5 * 2836 * 4.7 3.7 22 Veronica longifolia L. 27.3 76.7 708 4117 4.8 5.0 NIR0.05 8.7 20.4 1015 319 2.18 ns - eliminated, * shorter vegetation, ** destroyed by the animals

1804

Conclusions

The results of the study denote the efficiency of the species introduction (especially the ones of drier habitats) to the Arrhenatherion elatioris communities and improving their floristic diversity. The planted species will be monitored during next years. The stabilisation or increase in population size of the species, affirmed by multi-years observations, will be able to consider as the full success. The authors seem that the steps to the right direction, encouraging to the next tries of another plant species introduction, occurred before in the reserve or in similar meadow habitats of the same geobotanical region, were made. The detailed cognition of various plant species reactions in changed habitat conditions will allow for the working out the strategy of restoration the meadow communities of high species richness, and in consequence the improving of landscape and aesthetical functions of the reserve. To secure their long-lasting the regular management (twofold mowing) is recommended.

References

Falińska K. (2004). Ekologia roślin [Ecology of plants]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 1-512 [In Polish]. Grabowska E. (2016). Flora rezerwatu „Skarpa Ursynowska” pod wpływem antropopresji [The flora of “Skarpa Ursynowska” nature reserve influenced by human impast]. Przegląd Przyrodniczy XXVII, 2, 3-27 [In Polish with English summary]. Hedberg P., Kotowski W. (2010). New nature by sowing? The current state of species introduction in grassland restoration, and the road ahead. Journal for Nature Conservation 18, 304-308. Janicka M., (2000). Changes in floristic composition of meadow sward under the influence of habitat conditions and neglecting in the management. Proceedings of the International Symposium “Conventional and ecological grassland and management”, Tartu, , 69-74. Janicka M., Kwiecień R. (2004). Zmiany składu gatunkowego runi łąkowej po pięciu latach od zaprzestania użytkowania [The changes in species composition of sward after desistance from meadow management for five years]. Łąkarstwo w Polsce, 7, 101- 111[In Polish with English summary]. Janicka M., Pawluśkiewicz B., Dąbrowski P. (2016). Waloryzacja zbiorowisk łąkowych z udziałem Arrhenatherum elatius i Bromus inermis ukształtowanych w wyniku zaniechania użytkowania na terenie rezerwatu „Skarpa Ursynowska” [Natural and usefulness valorization of the meadow communities with the share of Arrhenatherum elatius and Bromus inermis formed as the result of managing abandonment in the “Skarpa Ursynowska” nature reserve]. Polish Journal of Agronomy, 27, 71-80 [In Polish with English summary]. Kozłowska T. (2005). Zmiany zbiorowisk łąkowych na tle różnicowania się warunków siedliskowych w charakterystycznych obszarach dolin rzecznych Polski Centralnej [Change of meadow communities under differing habitat conditions in characteristic areas of river valleys of central Poland]. Woda-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie. Rozpr. Nauk. i Mon. 14., pp. 208 [In Polish with English summary]. Kozłowski M.W., Sielezniew M. (1996). Wstępna inwentaryzacja motyli dziennych (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) Skarpy Ursynowskiej SGGW i terenów przyległych [The Ursynow Slope area butterflies (Lepidoptera, Rhapalocera) preliminary inventarisation]. Sci. Rev. Eng. Env. Sci. 9: 85-94 [In Polish with English summary].

1805

Kozłowski, S. (2002). Trawy w polskim krajobrazie [Grasses in the Polish landscape]. [In:] Polska księga traw, ed. L. Frey,W. Szafer Institute of Botany, PAS Press, Krakow, 301- 322 [In Polish with English summary]. Kucharski, L. (2015). Vegetation in abandoned meadows in central Poland: Pilsia valley. Case study. Acta Sci. Pol. Agricultura, 14(2), 37-47, www.agricultura.acta.utp.edu.pl. Mirek Z., Piękoś-Mirkowa H., Zając A., Zając M. (2002). Flowering plants and pteridophytes of Poland: a checklist. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, PAS Press, Krakow. Pawłat H., Wanke P., Wolski P. (1996). Warunki wodno-glebowe tarasu nadzalewowego Wisły w rejonie Skarpy Ursynowskiej [Water and soil conditions of up-terrace of Vistula River Valley in the Skarpa Ursynowska (Ursynow Slope) area]. Rev. Eng. Env. Sci. 9: 31-37 [In Polish with English summary]. Pärtel, M., Bruun, H.H., Sammul, M. (2005). Biodiversity in temperate European grasslands: origin and conservation. Grassland Sci. Eur., 10, 1-14. Plantureux S., Peeters A., McCracken D. (2005). Biodiversity in intensive grasslands: Effect of management, improvement and challenges. Agronomy Research 3(2), 153–164. Rutkowska B., Janicka M., Szymczak R., Ślusarek A. (1999). Wpływ warunków siedliskowych i zaniedbania pratotechniki na zmiany florystyczne runi łąkowej [The influence of habitat conditions and neglecting in the management on changes in the floristic composition of meadow sward]. Folia Universitatis Agriculturae Stetinensis 197, Agricultura, 75: 271-278 [In Polish with English summary]. Scotton M., Kirmer A., Krautzer B. (red.) (2012). Practical handbook for seed harvest and ecological restoration of species-rich grasslands. CLEUP, Padova, , 1-116. Sienkiewicz-Paderewska, D., Borawska-Jarmułowicz, B., Mastalerczuk, G., Chodkiewicz, A., Stypiński, P. (2012). Wpływ zaprzestania koszenia na roślinność łąki trzęślicowej (Molinietum caeruleae) [Effects of mowing cessation on Molinietum caerulae meadow vegetation]. Woda-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie, 12(1), 167-179 [In Polish with English summary]. Snopek A. (2016). Problemy funkcjonowania rezerwatu przyrody na kampusie akademickim: przykład rezerwatu Skarpa Ursynowska (Warszawa) i Foret de Dorigny (Ecublens, Szwajcaria) [The problems of nature reserve on academic campus: Skarpa Ursynowska (Warsaw, Poland) and Foret de Dorigny (Ecublens, ) case studies]. Przegląd Przyrodniczy XXVII, 4, 133-146 [In Polish with English summary]. Trąba Cz., Wolański P., Oklejewicz K. (2006). Różnorodność florystyczna wybranych zbiorowisk nieleśnych w dolinie Sanu [Floristic diversity of selected nonforest plant communities in the San River valley]. Annales UMCS Sect. E, 61, 267–275 [In Polish with English summary].Floristic diversity of selected nonforest plant communities in the San river valley Floristic diversity of selected nonforest plant communities in the San river valley Floristic diversity of selected nonforest plant communities in the San river valley The Edict (1996) Zarządzenie Regionalnego Ministra Środowiska, Zasobów Naturalnych i Leśnictwa z dnia 14 czerwca 1996 r. w sprawie uznania za rezerwat przyrody [Regulation of the Regional Minister of the Environment, Natural Resources and Forestry of 14 June 1996 on recognition as a nature reserve]. M.P. 1996, nr 42, poz. 410-411 [In Polish]. The Edict (2007) Rozporządzenie Nr 3 Wojewody Mazowieckiego z dnia 13 lutego 2007r. w sprawie Warszawskiego Obszaru Chronionego Krajobrazu [Regulation No. 3 of the Mazowieckie Province Governor dated 13 February 2007. on the Warsaw Protected Landscape Area.]. Dz.U. of 2004r. Nr 92, poz. 880 and of 2005r. Nr 113, poz. 954 i Nr 130, poz. 1087 [In Polish].

1806

The Edict (2011) Zarządzenie RDOŚ w Warszawie z dnia 19 lipca 2011 r. w sprawie rezerwatu przyrody „Skarpa Ursynowska” [Order of the Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Warsaw of 19 July 2011 on the nature reserve "Skarpa Ursynowska"], access in May 2017. [http://bip.warszawa.rdos.gov.pl] [In Polish]. Vinczeffy I. (1984). The effects of some ecological factors on grass yield. Proceedings of the 10th General Meeting of European Grassland Federation, Ås, , 76-79. Walker K.J., Stevens P. A., Stevens D. P., Mountford J. O., Manchester S. J., Pywell R. F. (2004). The restoration and re-creation of species-rich lowland grassland on land formerly managed for intensive agriculture in the UK. Biological Conservation 119, 1- 18. Wallin L., Svensson B. M., Lönn M. (2009). Artificial dispersal as a restoration tool in meadows sowing or planting? Restoration Ecology, 17, 270-279. Warda M., Kozłowski S. 2012. Grassland – a Polish resource. Grassland Science in Europe 17, 3–16. Winter C., Lehmann S., Diekmann M. (2008). Determinants of reproductive success: A comparative study of five endangered river corridor plants in fragmented habitats. Biological Conservation 141, 1095-1104 Wysocki C., Budzikowski H. (1996). Roślinność Skarpy Ursynowskiej (na odcinku między ul. Arbuzową a Ciszewskiego) [Vegetation on the Ursynow Slope with the area between Arbuzowa St. and Ciszewskiego St.]. Rev. Eng. Env. Sci. 9: 75-83 [In Polish with English summary]. Zarzycki J., Misztal A. (2010). Abandonment of farming practices: impact on vegetation. Grassland Science in Europe 15, 133–135. Zarzycki K., Trzcińska-Tacik H., Różański W., Szeląg Z., Wołek J., Korzeniak U. (2002). Ecological indicator values of vascular plants of Poland. Biodiversity of Poland. Vol. 2. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, PAS Press, Kraków.

1807