Gap Analysis Final Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gap Analysis Final Report University of Primorska Science and Research Centre of Koper Institute for Biodiversity Studies WWF Project Reference No 9Z1387.05 “Protected Areas for a Living Planet – Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project” Protected Area Gap Analysis (Final Report) Peter Glasnovi ć, BSc Boris Krystufek, PhD Andrej Sovinc, MSc Mileta Bojovi ć, BSc Deni Porej, PhD December 2009 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis The Final Report by: University of Primorska Science and Research Centre of Koper Institute for Biodiversity Studies Garibaldijeva 1 6000 Koper Tel.: ++386 5 663 77 00, fax: ++386 5 663 77 10 E-mail: [email protected] Regional Scientific Coordinator: Peter Glasnovi ć, BSc; Boris Krystufek, PhD; Andrej Sovinc, MSc Cartography: Mileta Bojovi ć, BSc National Scientific Coordinators: Leon Kebe, BSc (Slovenia); Irina Zupan, MSc (Croatia); Senka Barudanovi ć, PhD (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Dragan Roganovi ć, PhD (Montenegro); Genti Kromidha, PhD (Albania) External experts: Boris Sket, PhD; Maja Zagmaister, PhD; Borut Štumberger, BSc WWF Mediterranean Programme Office: Director of Conservation Deni Porej, PhD Project Leader Stella Šatali ć, MSc Partners of the project: TNC (The Nature Conservancy), EuroNatur, Institute for Nature Conservation in Albania (Albania), University of Sarajevo – Faculty of Science (Bosnia and Herzegovina), State Institute for Nature Protection (Croatia), Institute for Nature Protection (Montenegro) 2 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis Acknowledgments: Dragan Kova čevi ć, Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Dejan Kulijer, Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Ozren Laganin, Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Matt Merrifield, PhD, TNC San Francisco (USA); Tihomir Predi ć, MSc, Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Dragan Ron čevi ć, National Park Kozara (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Ivica Udovi čić, Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina); Branko Vu čijak, PhD, Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) 3 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis List of Abbreviations CBD Convention on Biological Diversity BiH Bosnia and Herzegovina DAE Dinaric Arc Ecoregion NSC National Scientific Coordinator PA Protected Area PoWPA Programme of Work on Protected Areas RSC Regional Scientific Coordinator 4 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS 0. FORWORD 11 1. INTRODUCTION 13 1.1. Executive Summary 13 1.2. Definition of DAE 22 1.2.1 Statistical Definition of the Region 25 1.3. Overview of Gap Analysis 26 1.3.1. Land Cover 26 1.3.2. Biodiversity Targets 28 1.3.3. Protected Areas (PAs) 28 1.3.4. Gap Analysis 30 1.4. Work Progress and Timetable 31 2. INPUT DATA 34 2.1. Biodiversity Targets 34 2.1.0. Elevation 34 2.1.1. Forests 35 2.1.1.1. Evergreen Forests & Scrubs 35 2.1.1.2. Oriental Hornbeam Forests 36 2.1.1.3. Thermophilous and Supra-Mediterranean Oak Woods 37 2.1.1.4. Thermophilous Beech Forests 37 2.1.1.5. Montane and Subalpine Beech Forests 38 2.1.1.6. Oak-Hornbeam Forests 39 2.1.1.7. Hygrophilic Forests of Common Oak 39 2.1.1.8. Coastal Flooded Forests of Ash and Common Oak 40 2.1.1.9. Spruce and Fir Forests 40 2.1.1.10. Omorika Spruce Forests 41 2.1.1.11. Forests of Heldreich’s Pine 42 2.1.1.12. Forests of Macedonian Pine 42 2.1.1.13. Shrubs of Mountain Pine 42 2.1.2. Other Terrestrial Targets 43 2.1.2.1. Bogs 43 2.1.2.2. Canyons 44 2.1.2.3. Streams and Rivers 45 2.1.2.4. Mediterranean Lakes 48 2.1.2.5. High Mountain Lakes 49 2.1.2.6. High Mountain Grasslands (‘rudine’) 50 2.1.2.7. Thermophilous Grasslands 51 2.1.2.8. Oromediterranean Rocky Habitats 52 2.1.2.9. High-Mountain Rocky Habitats 53 2.1.2.10. Karstic Fields With Surface Hydrology 53 2.1.3. Cave Biodiversity 55 2.1.4. Species 67 2.1.4.1. Small Terrestrial Mammals 67 2.1.4.2. Reptiles 78 2.1.4.3. Amphibians 90 5 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis 2.1.4.4. Birds 96 2.1.4.5. Freshwater Fish of the Adriatic Basin 99 2.1.4.6. Large charismatic mammals 116 2.1.5. Marine 121 2.1.5.1. Sea Caves 122 2.1.5.2. Sea Grass Meadows 123 2.1.5.3. Coastal Lagoons 123 2.1.5.4. Bays 124 2.1.5.5. Salt Marshes, Standing Brackish and Saltwater 124 2.1.5.6. Dunes, Salt Steppes and Salt Scrubs 125 2.1.5.7. Fish Spawning and Feeding Sites 125 2.1.5.8. Corridors for the Loggerheaded Turtle 126 2.1.5.9. Important areas for bottlenose dolphin 126 3. PROTECTED AREAS 128 4. PLANNED INFRASTRUCTURE 145 5. GAP ANALYSIS 146 5.1. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs 146 5.1.1. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs in Slovenia 146 5.1.2. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs in Croatia 147 5.1.3. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs in Bosnia and Herzegovina 148 5.1.4. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs and land in Montenegro 150 5.1.5. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs in Albania 151 5.1.6. Altitudinal Distribution of PAs in the DAE 153 5.2. Distribution of gaps 155 5.2.1. Distribution of gaps in Slovenia 160 5.2.2. Distribution of gaps in Croatia 160 5.2.3. Distribution of gaps in Bosnia and Herzegovina 162 5.2.4. Distribution of gaps in Montenegro 162 5.2.5. Distribution of gaps in Albania 163 5.2.6. Distribution of gaps in the DAE 163 5.3. Biodiversity targets Gap Analysis 164 5.3.1. Forests 164 5.3.1.1. Evergreen forests & scrubs 164 5.3.1.2. Oriental hornbeam forests 165 5.3.1.3. Thermophilous and supra-Mediterranean oak woods 166 5.3.1.4. Thermophilous beech forests 167 5.3.1.5. Montane and subalpine beech forests 168 5.3.1.6. Oak-hornbeam forests 169 5.3.1.7. Hygrophilic forests of common oak 170 5.3.1.8. Coastal flooded forests of ash and common oak 171 5.3.1.9. Spruce and fir forests 172 5.3.1.10. Omorika spruce forests 173 5.3.1.11. Forests of Heldreich’s pine 174 5.3.1.12. Forests of Macedonian pine 175 5.3.1.13. Shrubs of mountain pine 176 5.3.2. Other terrestrial targets 177 5.3.2.1. Bogs 177 6 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis 5.3.2.2. Canyons 178 5.3.2.3. Streams and rivers 179 5.3.2.4. Mediterranean lakes 181 5.3.2.5. High mountain lakes 182 5.3.2.6. High mountain grasslands (‘rudine’) 183 5.3.2.7. Thermophilous grasslands 184 5.3.2.8. Oromediterranean rocky habitats 185 5.3.2.9. High-mountain rocky habitats 186 5.3.2.10. Karstic fields with surface hydrology 187 5.3.3. Cave biodiversity 188 5.3.3.1. Coleoptera hotspots 188 5.3.3.2. Congeria kusceri 189 5.3.3.3. Marifugia cavatica 190 5.3.3.4. Velkovrhia enigmatica 191 5.3.3.5. Proteus anguinus 192 5.3.4. Species 193 5.3.4.1. Small terrestrial mammals 193 5.3.4.1.1. Sorex araneus 193 5.3.4.1.2. Sorex alpinus 194 5.3.4.1.3. Sorex minutus 195 5.3.4.1.4. Neomys fodiens 196 5.3.4.1.5. Neomys anomalus 197 5.3.4.1.6. Suncus etruscus 198 5.3.4.1.7. Talpa europaea 199 5.3.4.1.8. Talpa caeca 200 5.3.4.1.9. Talpa stankovici 201 5.3.4.1.10. Dinaromys bogdanovi 202 5.3.4.1.11. Myodes glareolus 203 5.3.4.1.12. Arvicola terrestris 204 5.3.4.1.13. Microtus arvalis 206 5.3.4.1.14. Microtus agrestis 207 5.3.4.1.15. Microtus subterraneus 208 5.3.4.1.16. Microtus liechtensteini 209 5.3.4.1.17. Microtus thomasi 210 5.3.4.1.18. Chionomys nivalis 211 5.3.4.1.19. Apodemus agrarius 212 5.3.4.1.20. Apodemus flavicollis 213 5.3.4.1.21. Apodemus epimelas 214 5.3.4.1.22. Micromys minutus 215 5.3.4.1.23. Mus spicilegus 216 5.3.4.1.24. Spalax leucodon 217 5.3.4.1.25. Muscardinus avellanarius 218 5.3.4.1.26. Dryomys nitedula 219 5.3.4.1.27. Eliomys quercinus 220 5.3.4.2. Reptiles 221 5.3.4.2.1. Testudo hermanni 221 5.3.4.2.2. Mauremys rivulata 222 5.3.4.2.3. Pseudapus apodus 223 5.3.4.2.4. Hemidactylus turcicus 224 5.3.4.2.5. Ablepharus kitaibelli 225 7 WWF Dinaric Arc Ecoregion Project Protected Area Gap Analysis 5.3.4.2.6. Algyroides nigropunctatus 226 5.3.4.2.7. Iberolacerta horvathi 227 5.3.4.2.8. Dinarolacerta mosorensis 228 5.3.4.2.9. Dinarolacerta montenegrina 229 5.3.4.2.10. Lacerta bilineata 230 5.3.4.2.11. Lacerta trilineata 231 5.3.4.2.12. Lacerta viridis 232 5.3.4.2.13. Dalmatolacerta oxycephala 233 5.3.4.2.14. Lacerta agilis 234 5.3.4.2.15. Podarcis erhardii 235 5.3.4.2.16. Podarcis melisellensis 236 5.3.4.2.17. Podarcis muralis 237 5.3.4.2.18. Podarcis sicula 238 5.3.4.2.19. Podarcis taurica 239 5.3.4.2.20.
Recommended publications
  • Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid Region - Albania
    TOWARDS STRENGTHENED GOVERNANCE OF THE SHARED TRANSBOUNDARY NATURAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE LAKE OHRID REGION Baseline Assessment of the Lake Ohrid region - Albania IUCN – ICOMOS joint draft report January 2016 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................... i A. Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 B. The study area ........................................................................................................................................... 5 B.1 The physical environment ............................................................................................................. 5 B.2 The biotic environment ................................................................................................................. 7 B.3 Cultural Settings ............................................................................................................................ 0 C. Heritage values and resources/ attributes ................................................................................................ 6 C.1 Natural heritage values and resources ......................................................................................... 6 C.2 Cultural heritage values and resources....................................................................................... 12 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 69 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fresneda Javier, Grebennikov Vasily V., Ribera Ignacio Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp.n. from the Russian Far East 99-123 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 99 69 (2) 99 –123 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 21.07.2011 The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp. n. from the Russian Far East JAVIER FRESNEDA 1, 2, VASILY V. GREBENNIKOV 3 & IGNACIO RIBERA 4, * 1 Ca de Massa, 25526 Llesp, Lleida, Spain 2 Museu de Ciències Naturals (Zoologia), Passeig Picasso s/n, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] 3 Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada [[email protected]] 4 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37 – 49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] * Corresponding author Received 26.iv.2011, accepted 27.v.2011. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 21.vii.2011. > Abstract The tribe Leptodirini of the beetle family Leiodidae is one of the most diverse radiations of cave animals, with a distribution centred north of the Mediterranean basin from the Iberian Peninsula to Iran. Six genera outside this core area, most notably Platycholeus Horn, 1880 in the western United States and others in East Asia, have been assumed to be related to Lepto- dirini.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Bohlen.Vp:Corelventura
    Folia biologica (Kraków), vol. 51 (2003), Supplement Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the River Moraèa Basin, Montenegro: distribution, Habitat, Population Structure and Conservation Needs Jörg BOHLEN, Vendula ŠLECHTOVÁ, Radek ŠANDA, Jörg FREYHOF, Jasna VUKIC, and Danilo MRDAK Accepted April 17, 2003 BOHLEN J., ŠLECHTOVÁ V., ŠANDA R., KALOUS L., FREYHOF J., VUKIC J., MRDAK D. 2003. Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the River Moraèa basin, Montenegro: distribution, habitat, population structure and conservation needs. Folia biol. (Kraków) 51(Suppl.): 147-153. In this paper, we report on the distribution, habitat, population structure and conservation needs of Cobitis ohridana and Barbatula zetensis in the basin of the River Moraèa in Montenegro. Our data show both species to be mainly distributed in the lower stretch of the main river and some tributaries in lowland habitats. Cobitis ohridana preferred more shallow water with a higher abundance of filamentous algae, while Barbatula zetensis was more numerous in slightly deeper water with more stones as a bottom substrate. Slight differences in the habitat preference were also observed between juveniles and adults in both species. Although both species are abundant in suited habitat, they have a small distribution area in the Moraèa basin due to the natural rarity of the habitat. According to our data, they are not endangered. Key words: Balitoridae, Cobitidae, Mediterranean, conservation, habitat preferences, outecology. Jörg BOHLEN, Vendula ŠLECHTOVÁ, Lukáš KALOUS,Institute of Animal Physiology and Ge- netics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 277 21 Libechov, Czech Republic. E-mail: [email protected] Radek ŠANDA, Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Zoology, Vinièná 7, 128 44 Prague, Czech Republic; Czech National Museum, Department of Zoology, Václavské námìstí 68, 115 79 Prague, Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotspots of Subterranean Biodiversity in Caves and Wells
    ...J Oklahoma State Univ. Interlibrary Loan Call#: pdf w Location: pdf a:: Journal Title: Journal of cave and karst studies ; <( the National Speleological Society bulletin. Volume: 62 Issue: 1 ARIEL MonthNear: 2000 MaxCost: $501FM Pages: 11-17 Scanned by: Article Title: DC Culver and B Sket; Hotspots of Subterranean Shipped by: Biodiversity in Caves and Wells Ariel: 128.194.84.50 Article Author: Fax: 979-458-2032 or Borrower: TXA Shipping Address: Patron: Bandel, Micaela TAMU Libraries - College Station .. TAE z 41 HOU I- ILL Number: 85855670 Lending ~ String: *OKS,COD,IXA,TXH,VA@ ""0 The work from which this copy was made did not include a formal copyright notice. Copyright law may protect this work. Uses may be al lowed with permission from the rights holder, or if the copyright on the work has expired, or if the use is "fair use" or if it is within another exemption. The user of this work is responsible for determining its lawful uses. David C. Culver and Boris Sket - Hotspots of Subterranean Biodiversity in Caves and Wells . .Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 62(1):11-17. HOTSPOTS OF SUBTERRANEAN BIODIVERSITY IN CAVES AND WELLS DAVID C. CULVER Department of Biology, American University, 4400 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20016, USA, [email protected] BORIS SKET Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, PO. Box 2995, 1001 Ljubljana, SLOVENIA, [email protected] We documented 18 caves and two karst wells that have 20 or more stygobites and troglobites. Crustacea dominated the aquatic fauna. Taxonomic composition ofthe terrestrial fauna varied, but Arachnida and Insecta together usually dominated.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Methodology and Protocols for 20 Habitats, 20 Species and 20 Birds
    1 Finnish Environment Institute SYKE, Finland Monitoring methodology and protocols for 20 habitats, 20 species and 20 birds Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 Strengthening the capacities for effective implementation of the acquis in the field of nature protection Report D 3.1. - 1. 7.11.2019 Funded by the European Union The Ministry of Environment and Physical Planning, Department of Nature, Republic of North Macedonia Metsähallitus (Parks and Wildlife Finland), Finland The State Service for Protected Areas (SSPA), Lithuania 2 This project is funded by the European Union This document has been produced with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of the Twinning Project MK 13 IPA EN 02 17 and and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union 3 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary 6 Overview 8 Establishment of Natura 2000 network and the process of site selection .............................................................. 9 Preparation of reference lists for the species and habitats ..................................................................................... 9 Needs for data .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Protocols for the monitoring of birds ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Šumarski Fakultet Preddiplomski Studij
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Zagreb Repository ŠUMARSKI FAKULTET PREDDIPLOMSKI STUDIJ ŠUMARSTVO JOSIP ŽAČEK TAKSONOMSKI STATUS, RASPROSTRANJENOST I MORFOLOŠKE ZNAČAJKE AUTOHTONIH VRSTA RODA IRIS L. U HRVATSKOJ ZAVRŠNI RAD ZAGREB, rujan 2015. Zavod: Zavod za šumarsku genetiku, dendrologiju i botaniku Predmet: Šumarska botanika Mentor: Prof. dr. sc. Jozo Franjić Asistent: Dr. sc. Daniel Krstonošić Student: Josip Žaček JMBAG: 0068210787 Akad. godina: 2014/2015 Mjesto,datum Zagreb, 25. rujna 2015. godine obrane: Sadržaj rada: Slika: 18 Tablica: 0 Navoda literature: 10 Sažetak: Rod Iris L. je rasprostranjen na Sjevernoj polutci. Rod se odlikuje velikim brojem vrsta, podvrsta, varijeteta i križanaca. Za područje Europe navodi se oko 30 vrsta, a u hrvatskoj flori 15 vrsta i 1 podvrsta. Od kojih su za šumska staništa značajne vrste – hrvatska perunika (I. croatica Horvat et M. D. Horvat), germanska perunika (I. germanica L.), uskolisna perunika (I. graminea L.), sibirska perunika (I. sibirica L), ilirska perunika (I. illyrica L.), žuta perunika (I. pseudacorus L.), šarena perunika (I. variegata L.). Sadržaj 1. Uvod .................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Prirodno stanište ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Morfološke značajke..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE HERPETOFAUNA of KRNOVO (MONTENEGRO) Lidija P O L O V I
    NATURA MONTENEGRINA, Podgorica, 2013, 12(1): 109-115 ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPER THE HERPETOFAUNA OF KRNOVO (MONTENEGRO) Lidija P O L O V I Ć and Natalija Č A Đ ENOVIĆ The Natural History Museum of Montenegro, P.O.Box 374, 81000 Podgorica, Montenegro. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] SYNOPSIS Key words: In Krnovo area we recorded 3 species of amphibians (Mesotriton species list, alpestris, Bombina variegata, Bufo bufo) and 9 species of reptiles amphibians, (Lacerta agilis, Lacerta viridis, Podarcis muralis, Dinarolacerta reptiles, mosorensis, Natrix natrix, Natrix tessellata, Coronella austriaca, Krnovo, Zamenis longissimus, Vipera ammodytes) in 8 localities. Montenegro. SINOPSIS Ključne riječi: HERPETOFAUNA KRNOVA (CRNA GORA) spisak vrsta, Na području Krnova registrovali smo 3 vrste vodozemaca vodozemci, (Mesotriton alpestris, Bombina variegata, Bufo bufo) i 9 vrsta gmizavci, gmizavaca (Lacerta agilis, Lacerta viridis, Podarcis muralis, Krnovo, Dinarolacerta mosorensis, Natrix natrix, Natrix tessellata, Coronella Crna Gora. austriaca, Zamenis longissimus, Vipera ammodytes) na 8 lokaliteta. INTRODUCTION Previous herpetological studies in Montenegro included only few areas, mostly National Parks (DŽUKIĆ, 1991; CRNOBRNJA-ISAILOVIĆ & DŽUKIĆ, 1995; TOMOVIĆ et al., 2004; POLOVIĆ & LJUBISAVLJEVIĆ, 2010). Detailed amphibian and reptile species lists are generally missing. The most detailed available lists of herpetofauna for the northern part of Montenegro are species list of the Massif of Durmitor and Tara River Canyon (DŽUKIĆ, 1991) and species list of Bjelasica Mountain (TOMOVIĆ et al., 2004). Krnovo is situated in North-Western Montenegro, on a plateau between the Vojnik and Lola mountains. The altitude of this plateau varies from 1300 m to 1850 m a.s.l. Krnovo area is characterized by mesophilic meadows and pastures, cultivated fields, bordered by beech forest and boscage, and sporadically parted by communities of rocky pastures.
    [Show full text]
  • Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History Database
    Literature Cited in Lizards Natural History database Abdala, C. S., A. S. Quinteros, and R. E. Espinoza. 2008. Two new species of Liolaemus (Iguania: Liolaemidae) from the puna of northwestern Argentina. Herpetologica 64:458-471. Abdala, C. S., D. Baldo, R. A. Juárez, and R. E. Espinoza. 2016. The first parthenogenetic pleurodont Iguanian: a new all-female Liolaemus (Squamata: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. Copeia 104:487-497. Abdala, C. S., J. C. Acosta, M. R. Cabrera, H. J. Villaviciencio, and J. Marinero. 2009. A new Andean Liolaemus of the L. montanus series (Squamata: Iguania: Liolaemidae) from western Argentina. South American Journal of Herpetology 4:91-102. Abdala, C. S., J. L. Acosta, J. C. Acosta, B. B. Alvarez, F. Arias, L. J. Avila, . S. M. Zalba. 2012. Categorización del estado de conservación de las lagartijas y anfisbenas de la República Argentina. Cuadernos de Herpetologia 26 (Suppl. 1):215-248. Abell, A. J. 1999. Male-female spacing patterns in the lizard, Sceloporus virgatus. Amphibia-Reptilia 20:185-194. Abts, M. L. 1987. Environment and variation in life history traits of the Chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Ecological Monographs 57:215-232. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2003. Anfibios y reptiles del Uruguay. Montevideo, Uruguay: Facultad de Ciencias. Achaval, F., and A. Olmos. 2007. Anfibio y reptiles del Uruguay, 3rd edn. Montevideo, Uruguay: Serie Fauna 1. Ackermann, T. 2006. Schreibers Glatkopfleguan Leiocephalus schreibersii. Munich, Germany: Natur und Tier. Ackley, J. W., P. J. Muelleman, R. E. Carter, R. W. Henderson, and R. Powell. 2009. A rapid assessment of herpetofaunal diversity in variously altered habitats on Dominica.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of the Via Dinarica
    Tel : +47 22413030 | Epost :[email protected]| Web :www.reisebazaar.no Karl Johans gt. 23, 0159 Oslo, Norway The Best of the Via Dinarica Turkode Destinasjoner Turen starter TVR Albania - Kosovo - Montenegro Tirana Turen destinasjon Reisen er levert av 13 dager Tirana Fra : NOK Oversikt Stunning mountainous landscapes in Albania, Kosovo and Montenegro Reiserute Day 1 Start Tirana, Albania The tour starts at our centrally located hotel in Tirana, Albania's trendy capital (approx. 30 minutes drive from the airport). The group flight arrives in the evening. Our leader will hold a briefing in the morning to discuss the upcoming trip and answer any questions.Hotel Kruja or similar Day 2 Drive to Komani Lake; scenic ferry journey, followed by a walk to Tropoje Village This morning we drive (approx. 4 hrs) to Komani Lake. We then have a 2 hour ferry journey through the gorge to Fierza. The boat journey allows us to take in the spectacular scenery whilst we wind our way between high cliffs and towering peaks. It is described as one of the world's great boat journeys. Three hydroelectric power plants have been built here at the lake, which produces approx. 70% of Albania's electricity. Upon arrival in Fierza, we'll visit the 200 year old Mic Sokoli tower, which is significant in northern Albanian history and culture. We'll then walk for 2 hours to our guesthouse in Tropoje.Aste Guesthouse or similar Day 3 Through Tropoje Valley, following the river to Sylbice We walk up through Tropoje Valley and follow the river, taking several breaks along the way to enjoy the beautiful alpine scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
    FIFTH NATIONAL REPORT TO THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA May, 2014 BASIC INFORMATION Project Title Support to Bosnia and Herzegovina for the Revision of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP BiH) and Development of the Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) Project Acronym NBSAP BiH Project Duration Period January 2013 – December 2014 GEF Implementation United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP Agency GEF Operational Focal Point Senad Oprašić, PhD, Head of the Environmental Protection for Bosnia and Herzegovina Department at the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Relations of Bosnia and Herzegovina (MoFTER BiH) UNCBD Focal Point for BiH Mehmed Cero, M. Sc., Assistant Minister in the Environment Sector of the FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism (MoET FBiH) 2 Client: FBiH Ministry of Environment and Tourism Supported by: United Nations Environment Programme – UNEP External Associate Experts: Senka Barudanović Stjepan Matić Radoslav Dekić Dragojla Golub Consultant: Centre for Energy, Environment and Resources (CENER 21) Translation and Proofreading: Gordana Lonco Edina Dmitrović Graphic Design: Tarik Hodžić 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to thank the following institutions for the support that they provided in the development of the Fifth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (UNCBD) and through their participation in workshops, provision of data, information, comments and suggestions: Aarhus Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Species of the Anemadus Taiwanus Species-Group (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Anemadini) from China
    Zootaxa 4072 (2): 282–290 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2016 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4072.2.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1C21A78B-C978-4C2B-BD83-66F54478980E Two new species of the Anemadus taiwanus species-group (Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae: Anemadini) from China CHENG-BIN WANG1 & HONG-ZHANG ZHOU1, 2 1Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1 Beichen West Rd., Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, P. R. China 2Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Anemadus perreaui sp. nov. and A. sichuanus sp. nov., both belong to the A. taiwanus species-group (Coleoptera: Leio- didae: Cholevinae, Anemadini), are described from Sichuan Province, China. Color plates and line drawings are offered to illustrate their important characteristics. A key to all species of the group is compiled so as to include the two new spe- cies. Key words: Leiodidae, Cholevinae, Anemadus, taxonomy, new species, China 摘要 本文描述了产自中国四川省的佩罗风小葬甲 Anemadus perreaui sp. nov. 与四川风小葬甲 A. sichuanus sp. nov.,两 者均隶属于台湾风小葬甲种组 A. taiwanus species-group (鞘翅目:球蕈甲科:小葬甲亚科,风小葬甲族)。我 们提供了彩色图版与线条图来阐明其重要特征,并且编制了一个该种组所有种 (包括两新种)的检索表。 Introduction The genus Anemadus, belonging to the subtribe Anemadina of the tibe Anemadini in the subfamily Cholevinae (Coleoptera: Leiodidae), was originally established by Reitter (1884), with Catops strigosus Kraatz, 1852 as the type species fixed by the subsequent designation by Jeannel (1922). Before our study, the genus Anemadus Reitter, 1884 was composed of 39 valid species; their geographical distributions are generally limited within the zoogeographical regions of the Palaearctic and the Oriental.
    [Show full text]
  • Thematic Roundtable on Agriculture, Rural Development, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Safety
    NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION THEMATIC ROUND TABLE ON AGRICULTURE, RURAL DEVELOPMENT, FORESTRY, FISHERIES AND FOOD SAFETY KOSOVO 2020 REPORT May 2013, Pristina This Report has been developed based on series of meetings conducted by the Thematic Roundtable on Agriculture, Rural Development, Forestry, Fisheries and Food Safety. As such this Report is part of a set of documents endorsed by Task Force for European Integration. The work of the Task Force for European Integration and its Thematic Roundtables, including the preparation of this Report has been supported by Deutsche Gesellschaft f· Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) through the Project “Support to the European Integration Process in Kosovo”. The views, information and/or arguments do not necessarily reect the ofcial opinion of the MEI, GiZ or any other stakeholder to every detail. TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................5 1. Agriculture and Rural Development ..................................................... 6 1.1. Background of the Sector .............................................................. 6 1.2. Institutional Development and Capacities ................................ 6 1.2.1. Department of Agriculture Policy and Markets ....................... 7 1.2.2. Department of Rural Development Policy/ Managing Authority .................................................................... 7 1.2.3. Department of Economical Analyses and Agriculture Statistics ...................................................................
    [Show full text]