DOCSLIB.ORG

Mips 16 Bit Instruction Set

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mips 16 Bit Instruction Set Mips 16 bit instruction set Continue Instruction set architecture MIPSDesignerMIPS Technologies, Imagination TechnologiesBits64-bit (32 → 64)Introduced1985; 35 years ago (1985)VersionMIPS32/64 Issue 6 (2014)DesignRISCTypeRegister-RegisterEncodingFixedBranchingCompare and branchEndiannessBiPage size4 KBExtensionsMDMX, MIPS-3DOpenPartly. The R12000 has been on the market for more than 20 years and therefore cannot be subject to patent claims. Thus, the R12000 and old processors are completely open. RegistersGeneral Target32Floating Point32 MIPS (Microprocessor without interconnected pipeline stages) is a reduced setting of the Computer Set (RISC) Instruction Set Architecture (ISA):A-3:19, developed by MIPS Computer Systems, currently based in the United States. There are several versions of MIPS: including MIPS I, II, III, IV and V; and five MIPS32/64 releases (for 32- and 64-bit sales, respectively). The early MIPS architectures were only 32-bit; The 64-bit versions were developed later. As of April 2017, the current version of MIPS is MIPS32/64 Release 6. MiPS32/64 differs primarily from MIPS I-V, defining the system Control Coprocessor kernel preferred mode in addition to the user mode architecture. The MIPS architecture has several additional extensions. MIPS-3D, which is a simple set of floating-point SIMD instructions dedicated to common 3D tasks, MDMX (MaDMaX), which is a more extensive set of SIMD instructions using 64-bit floating current registers, MIPS16e, which adds compression to flow instructions to make programs that take up less space, and MIPS MT, which adds layered potential. Computer architecture courses in universities and technical schools often study MIPS architecture. Architecture has had a major impact on later RISC architectures such as Alpha. History This section needs to be expanded. You can help by adding to it. (February 2020) See also: MIPS Technologies The first version of miPS architecture was developed by MIPS Computer Systems for its R2000 microprocessor, the first implementation of MIPS. Both MIPS and R2000 were introduced together in 1985. When MIPS II was introduced, MIPS was renamed MIPS I to distinguish it from the new version. The R6000 (1989) MIPS Computer Systems (1989) was the first miPS II. R6000, designed for servers, was manufactured and sold by Bipolar Integrated Technology, but was a commercial glitch. In the mid-1990s, many of the new 32-bit MIPS processors for built-in systems were MIPS II implementations, because the introduction of the 64-bit MIPS III architecture in 1991 left MIPS II as the newest 32-bit MIPS architecture before MIPS32 was introduced in 1999.A'3:19 MIPS computer systems R4000 microprocessor (1991) was the first implementation of MIPS III. for use in personal, workstations and servers MIPS Computer Systems actively promoted the MIPS and R4000 architecture by creating the Advanced Computing Environment (ACE) consortium to promote its Advanced RISC Computing (ARC) standard, which aims to create MIPS as the dominant personal computer platform. ARC has not found much success in personal computers, but the R4000 (and R4400 derivative) has been widely used in workstations and server computers, especially its largest user, Silicon Graphics. Other uses of the R4000 included high-quality built-in systems and supercomputers. MIPS III was eventually implemented by a number of embedded microprocessors. The R4600 (1993) and its quantum effect derivatives were widely used in high-quality built-in systems and low-level workstations and servers. MIPS Technologies' R4200 (1994) was designed for built-in systems, laptops and personal computers. The derivative, the R4300i, manufactured by NEC Electronics, was used in the Nintendo 64 game console. The Nintendo 64, along with the PlayStation, were among the highest-volume users of MIPS architecture processors in the mid-1990s. The first implementation of MIPS IV was the MIPS Technologies R8000 microprocessor chipset (1994). The R8000 was built at Silicon Graphics, Inc., and was only used in high-quality workstations and servers for science and technology applications, where high performance on large floating point loads was important. Later realizations were MIPS Technologies R10000 (1996) and quantum effects devices R5000 (1996) and RM7000 (1998). The R10000, manufactured and sold by NEC Electronics and Toshiba, and its derivatives were used by NEC, Pyramid Technology, Silicon Graphics, Inc. and Tandem Computers (among others) on workstations, servers and supercomputers. The R5000 and R7000 are used in high-quality built-in systems, personal computers and low-level workstations and servers. The derivative of Toshiba's R5000, R5900, was used by Sony Computer Entertainment's Emotion Engine, which powered its PlayStation 2 gaming console. Announced on October 21, 1996 at the Microprocessor Forum 1996 along with the expansion of MIPS Digital Media Extensions (MDMX), MIPS V was designed to enhance the performance of 3D graphic transformations. In the mid-1990s, the main use of non-embedded MIPS microprocessors was SGI graphics workstations. The MIPS V was completed by the only INtegrator extension of MDMX to provide a complete system to improve the performance of 3D graphics applications. MiPS V implementations were never presented. On May 12, 1997, SGI announced the H1 (Beast) and H2 microprocessors (Captain). The first was to be the first introduction of MIPS V and was to be introduced in the first half of 1999 The H1 and H2 projects were later merged and eventually cancelled in 1998. Although there were no miPS V, V, Issue 1 (1999) was based on MIPS V and retains all its features as an additional Coprocessor 1 (FPU) feature called Paired-Single. When MIPS Technologies was spun off from Silicon Graphics in 1998, it refocused on the built-in market. Unlike the MIPS V, each subsequent version was a strict supernet of the previous version, but this property was recognized as a problem, and the definition of architecture was changed to define the 32-bit and 64-bit architecture: MIPS32 and MIPS64. Both were introduced in 1999. MIPS32 is based on MIPS II with some additional features from MIPS III, MIPS IV and MIPS V; MIPS64 based on MIPS V., Toshiba and SiByte (later acquired by Broadcom) received licenses for MIPS64 immediately after it was announced. Since then, they have been joined by Philips, LSI Logic, IDT, Raza Microelectronics, Inc., Cavium, Loongson Technology and Ingenic Semiconductor. MIPS32/MIPS64 Issue 5 was announced on December 6, 2012. Issue 4 was missed because number four is perceived as unsuccessful in many Asian cultures. In December 2018, Wave Computing, the new owner of MIPS architecture, announced that MIPS ISA would be open source in a program called MIPS Open. The program was designed to open access to the latest versions of both 32-bit and 64-bit designs, making them available without any licensing or royalties, as well as granting participants licenses for existing MIPS patents. In March 2019, one version of the architecture was available under a free license, but later that year the program was closed again. The design of this section needs to be expanded. You can help by adding to it. (February 2020) MIPS presents it with a modular architecture that supports up to four coprocessors (CP0/1/2/3). In MIPS C0 terminology, it is a system control coprocessor (an integral part of the MIPS I-V implementation processor), CP1 is an additional floating point unit (FPU), and CP2/3 are additional implementation coprocessors (MIPS III deleted CP3 and reused its opcodes for other purposes). For example, the PlayStation CP2 game console is a geometry conversion engine (GTE) that speeds up geometry processing in 3D computer graphics. MiPS I MIPS versions are load/shop architecture (also known as register-register architecture); with the exception of the download/storage instructions used to access memory, all instructions work on registers. The MIPS I Registers has thirty-two 32-bit general purpose registers (GPR). Register $0 wired to zero and writes it discarded. Registration $31 is a link register. A pair of 32-bit registers, HI and LO, are provided for multiplication and separation instructions that work asynchronously from other instructions. a small set of instructions for copying data between common common and HI/LO registers. The program counter has 32 bits. Two low-order bats always contain zero, as MIPS I instructions are 32 bits long and correspond to their natural word boundaries. Instructions are divided into three types: R, I, and J. Each instruction starts with a 6-bit opcode. In addition to the opcode, the R-type instructions define three registers, a shift margin, and a field of function; I-type instructions define two registers and a 16-bit immediate value; The J-type instructions follow the opcode with a 26-bit jump target. A-174 The following three formats used for the main set of instructions: Type -31- format (bit) -0- R opcode (6) rs (5) rt (5) rd (5) shamt (5) funct (5) 6) I opcode (6) rs (5) rt (5) immediately (16) J opcode (6) address (26) instructions on MIPS I have instructions, that load and store 8-bit bytes, 16-bit half-words, and 32-bit words. Only one address mode is supported: basic movement. Because MIPS I is a 32-bit architecture, loading volumes of less than 32 bits requires that the datum be either signed or expanded to 32 bits. Load instructions, suffixed unsigned, perform zero extension; otherwise, the sign is being extended. Instructions for downloading the source of the base from GPR content (rs) and write the result to another GPR (rt). Instructions for storing the source of the database from GPR (rs) and store data from another GPR (rt). All download and storage instructions calculate the memory address, summing up the base with a 16-bit sign immediately. MIPS I requires that all memory accesses be aligned with their natural word boundaries, otherwise an exception is signaled.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Performance Computing Systems: Status and Outlook
    Acta Numerica (2012), pp. 001– c Cambridge University Press, 2012 doi:10.1017/S09624929 Printed in the United Kingdom High Performance Computing Systems: Status and Outlook J.J. Dongarra University of Tennessee and Oak Ridge National Laboratory and University of Manchester [email protected] A.J. van der Steen NCF/HPC Research L.J. Costerstraat 5 6827 AR Arnhem The Netherlands [email protected] CONTENTS 1 Introduction 1 2 The main architectural classes 2 3 Shared-memory SIMD machines 6 4 Distributed-memory SIMD machines 8 5 Shared-memory MIMD machines 10 6 Distributed-memory MIMD machines 13 7 ccNUMA machines 17 8 Clusters 18 9 Processors 20 10 Computational accelerators 38 11 Networks 53 12 Recent Trends in High Performance Computing 59 13 HPC Challenges 72 References 91 1. Introduction High Performance computer systems can be regarded as the most power- ful and flexible research instruments today. They are employed to model phenomena in fields so various as climatology, quantum chemistry, compu- tational medicine, High-Energy Physics and many, many other areas. In 2 J.J. Dongarra & A.J. van der Steen this article we present some of the architectural properties and computer components that make up the present HPC computers and also give an out- look on the systems to come. For even though the speed of computers has increased tremendously over the years (often a doubling in speed every 2 or 3 years), the need for ever faster computers is still there and will not disappear in the forseeable future. Before going on to the descriptions of the machines themselves, it is use- ful to consider some mechanisms that are or have been used to increase the performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Average Memory Access Time: Reducing Misses
    Review: Cache performance 332 Miss-oriented Approach to Memory Access: Advanced Computer Architecture ⎛ MemAccess ⎞ CPUtime = IC × ⎜ CPI + × MissRate × MissPenalt y ⎟ × CycleTime Chapter 2 ⎝ Execution Inst ⎠ ⎛ MemMisses ⎞ CPUtime = IC × ⎜ CPI + × MissPenalt y ⎟ × CycleTime Caches and Memory Systems ⎝ Execution Inst ⎠ CPIExecution includes ALU and Memory instructions January 2007 Separating out Memory component entirely Paul H J Kelly AMAT = Average Memory Access Time CPIALUOps does not include memory instructions ⎛ AluOps MemAccess ⎞ These lecture notes are partly based on the course text, Hennessy CPUtime = IC × ⎜ × CPI + × AMAT ⎟ × CycleTime and Patterson’s Computer Architecture, a quantitative approach (3rd ⎝ Inst AluOps Inst ⎠ and 4th eds), and on the lecture slides of David Patterson and John AMAT = HitTime + MissRate × MissPenalt y Kubiatowicz’s Berkeley course = ()HitTime Inst + MissRate Inst × MissPenalt y Inst + ()HitTime Data + MissRate Data × MissPenalt y Data Advanced Computer Architecture Chapter 2.1 Advanced Computer Architecture Chapter 2.2 Average memory access time: Reducing Misses Classifying Misses: 3 Cs AMAT = HitTime + MissRate × MissPenalt y Compulsory—The first access to a block is not in the cache, so the block must be brought into the cache. Also called cold start misses or first reference misses. There are three ways to improve cache (Misses in even an Infinite Cache) Capacity—If the cache cannot contain all the blocks needed during performance: execution of a program, capacity misses will occur due to blocks being discarded and later retrieved. (Misses in Fully Associative Size X Cache) 1. Reduce the miss rate, Conflict—If block-placement strategy is set associative or direct mapped, conflict misses (in addition to compulsory & capacity misses) will 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiprocessing Contents
    Multiprocessing Contents 1 Multiprocessing 1 1.1 Pre-history .............................................. 1 1.2 Key topics ............................................... 1 1.2.1 Processor symmetry ...................................... 1 1.2.2 Instruction and data streams ................................. 1 1.2.3 Processor coupling ...................................... 2 1.2.4 Multiprocessor Communication Architecture ......................... 2 1.3 Flynn’s taxonomy ........................................... 2 1.3.1 SISD multiprocessing ..................................... 2 1.3.2 SIMD multiprocessing .................................... 2 1.3.3 MISD multiprocessing .................................... 3 1.3.4 MIMD multiprocessing .................................... 3 1.4 See also ................................................ 3 1.5 References ............................................... 3 2 Computer multitasking 5 2.1 Multiprogramming .......................................... 5 2.2 Cooperative multitasking ....................................... 6 2.3 Preemptive multitasking ....................................... 6 2.4 Real time ............................................... 7 2.5 Multithreading ............................................ 7 2.6 Memory protection .......................................... 7 2.7 Memory swapping .......................................... 7 2.8 Programming ............................................. 7 2.9 See also ................................................ 8 2.10 References .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Totalview Reference Guide
    TotalView Reference Guide version 8.8 Copyright © 2007–2010 by TotalView Technologies. All rights reserved Copyright © 1998–2007 by Etnus LLC. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1996–1998 by Dolphin Interconnect Solutions, Inc. Copyright © 1993–1996 by BBN Systems and Technologies, a division of BBN Corporation. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, elec- tronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the prior written permission of TotalView Technologies. Use, duplication, or disclosure by the Government is subject to restrictions as set forth in subparagraph (c)(1)(ii) of the Rights in Technical Data and Computer Software clause at DFARS 252.227-7013. TotalView Technologies has prepared this manual for the exclusive use of its customers, personnel, and licensees. The infor- mation in this manual is subject to change without notice, and should not be construed as a commitment by TotalView Tech- nologies. TotalView Technologies assumes no responsibility for any errors that appear in this document. TotalView and TotalView Technologies are registered trademarks of TotalView Technologies. TotalView uses a modified version of the Microline widget library. Under the terms of its license, you are entitled to use these modifications. The source code is available at: ftp://ftp.totalviewtech.com/support/toolworks/Microline_totalview.tar.Z. All other brand names are the trademarks of their respective holders. Book Overview part I - CLI Commands 1
    [Show full text]
  • A Programming Model and Processor Architecture for Heterogeneous Multicore Computers
    A PROGRAMMING MODEL AND PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE FOR HETEROGENEOUS MULTICORE COMPUTERS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND THE COMMITTEE ON GRADUATE STUDIES OF STANFORD UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Michael D. Linderman February 2009 c Copyright by Michael D. Linderman 2009 All Rights Reserved ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Professor Teresa H. Meng) Principal Adviser I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Professor Mark Horowitz) I certify that I have read this dissertation and that, in my opinion, it is fully adequate in scope and quality as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. (Professor Krishna V. Shenoy) Approved for the University Committee on Graduate Studies. iii Abstract Heterogeneous multicore computers, those systems that integrate specialized accelerators into and alongside multicore general-purpose processors (GPPs), provide the scalable performance needed by computationally demanding information processing (informatics) applications. However, these systems often feature instruction sets and functionality that significantly differ from GPPs and for which there is often little or no sophisticated compiler support. Consequently developing applica- tions for these systems is difficult and developer productivity is low. This thesis presents Merge, a general-purpose programming model for heterogeneous multicore systems. The Merge programming model enables the programmer to leverage different processor- specific or application domain-specific toolchains to create software modules specialized for differ- ent hardware configurations; and provides language mechanisms to enable the automatic mapping of processor-agnostic applications to these processor-specific modules.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Architectures an Overview
    Computer Architectures An Overview PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:35:32 UTC Contents Articles Microarchitecture 1 x86 7 PowerPC 23 IBM POWER 33 MIPS architecture 39 SPARC 57 ARM architecture 65 DEC Alpha 80 AlphaStation 92 AlphaServer 95 Very long instruction word 103 Instruction-level parallelism 107 Explicitly parallel instruction computing 108 References Article Sources and Contributors 111 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 113 Article Licenses License 114 Microarchitecture 1 Microarchitecture In computer engineering, microarchitecture (sometimes abbreviated to µarch or uarch), also called computer organization, is the way a given instruction set architecture (ISA) is implemented on a processor. A given ISA may be implemented with different microarchitectures.[1] Implementations might vary due to different goals of a given design or due to shifts in technology.[2] Computer architecture is the combination of microarchitecture and instruction set design. Relation to instruction set architecture The ISA is roughly the same as the programming model of a processor as seen by an assembly language programmer or compiler writer. The ISA includes the execution model, processor registers, address and data formats among other things. The Intel Core microarchitecture microarchitecture includes the constituent parts of the processor and how these interconnect and interoperate to implement the ISA. The microarchitecture of a machine is usually represented as (more or less detailed) diagrams that describe the interconnections of the various microarchitectural elements of the machine, which may be everything from single gates and registers, to complete arithmetic logic units (ALU)s and even larger elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Production Cluster Visualization: Experiences and Challenges
    Workshop on Parallel Visualization and Graphics Production Cluster Visualization: Experiences and Challenges Randall Frank VIEWS Visualization Project Lead Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-PRES-200237 Workshop on Parallel Visualization and Graphics Why COTS Distributed Visualization Clusters? The realities of extreme dataset sizes (10TB+) • Stored with the compute platform • Cannot afford to copy the data • Co-resident visualization Track compute platform trends • Distributed infrastructure • Commodity hardware trends • Cost-effective solutions Migration of graphics leadership • The PC (Gamers) Desktops • Display technologies • HDR, resolution, stereo, tiled, etc Workshop on Parallel Visualization and Graphics 2 Production Visualization Requirements Unique, aggresive I/O requirements • Access patterns/performance Generation of graphical primitives • Graphics computation: primitive extraction/computation • Dataset decomposition (e.g. slabs vs chunks) Rendering of primitives • Aggregation of multiple rendering engines Video displays • Routing of digital or video tiles to displays (over distance) Interactivity (not a render-farm!) • Real-time imagery • Interaction devices, human in the loop (latency, prediction issues) Scheduling • Systems and people Workshop on Parallel Visualization and Graphics 3 Visualization Environment Architecture Archive PowerWall Analog Simulation Video Data Switch GigE Switch Visualization Engine Data Manipulation Engine Offices • Raw data on platform disks/archive systems • Data manipulation
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Playstation®2 Architecture
    Introduction to PlayStation®2 Architecture James Russell Software Engineer SCEE Technology Group In this presentation ä Company overview ä PlayStation 2 architecture overview ä PS2 Game Development ä Differences between PS2 and PC. Technology Group 1) Sony Computer Entertainment Overview SCE Europe (includes Aus, NZ, Mid East, America Technology Group Japan Southern Africa) Sales ä 40 million sold world-wide since launch ä Since March 2000 in Japan ä Since Nov 2000 in Europe/US ä New markets: Middle East, India, Korea, China ä Long term aim: 100 million within 5 years of launch ä Production facilities can produce 2M/month. Technology Group Design considerations ä Over 5 years, we’ll make 100,000,000 PS2s ä Design is very important ä Must be inexpensive (or should become that way) ä Technology must be ahead of the curve ä Need high performance, low price. Technology Group How to achieve this? ä Processor yield ä High CPU clock speed means lower yields ä Solution? ä Low CPU clock speed, but high parallelism ä Nothing readily available ä SCE designs custom chips. Technology Group 2) Technical Aspects of PlayStation 2 ä 128-bit CPU core “Emotion Engine” ä + 2 independent Vector Units ä + Image Processing Unit (for MPEG) ä GS - “Graphics Synthesizer” GPU ä SPU2 - Sound Processing Unit ä I/O Processor (CD/DVD, USB, i.Link). Technology Group “Emotion Engine” - Specifications ä CPU Core 128 bit CPU ä System Clock 300MHz ä Bus Bandwidth 3.2GB/sec ä Main Memory 32MB (Direct Rambus) ä Floating Point Calculation 6.2 GFLOPS ä 3D Geometry Performance 66 Million polygons/sec.
    [Show full text]
  • Sony's Emotionally Charged Chip
    VOLUME 13, NUMBER 5 APRIL 19, 1999 MICROPROCESSOR REPORT THE INSIDERS’ GUIDE TO MICROPROCESSOR HARDWARE Sony’s Emotionally Charged Chip Killer Floating-Point “Emotion Engine” To Power PlayStation 2000 by Keith Diefendorff rate of two million units per month, making it the most suc- cessful single product (in units) Sony has ever built. While Intel and the PC industry stumble around in Although SCE has cornered more than 60% of the search of some need for the processing power they already $6 billion game-console market, it was beginning to feel the have, Sony has been busy trying to figure out how to get more heat from Sega’s Dreamcast (see MPR 6/1/98, p. 8), which has of it—lots more. The company has apparently succeeded: at sold over a million units since its debut last November. With the recent International Solid-State Circuits Conference (see a 200-MHz Hitachi SH-4 and NEC’s PowerVR graphics chip, MPR 4/19/99, p. 20), Sony Computer Entertainment (SCE) Dreamcast delivers 3 to 10 times as many 3D polygons as and Toshiba described a multimedia processor that will be the PlayStation’s 34-MHz MIPS processor (see MPR 7/11/94, heart of the next-generation PlayStation, which—lacking an p. 9). To maintain king-of-the-mountain status, SCE had to official name—we refer to as PlayStation 2000, or PSX2. do something spectacular. And it has: the PSX2 will deliver Called the Emotion Engine (EE), the new chip upsets more than 10 times the polygon throughput of Dreamcast, the traditional notion of a game processor.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilore: Discovering a Lineage of Microprocessors
    iLORE: Discovering a Lineage of Microprocessors Samuel Lewis Furman Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science & Applications Kirk Cameron, Chair Godmar Back Margaret Ellis May 24, 2021 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: Computer history, systems, computer architecture, microprocessors Copyright 2021, Samuel Lewis Furman iLORE: Discovering a Lineage of Microprocessors Samuel Lewis Furman (ABSTRACT) Researchers, benchmarking organizations, and hardware manufacturers maintain repositories of computer component and performance information. However, this data is split across many isolated sources and is stored in a form that is not conducive to analysis. A centralized repository of said data would arm stakeholders across industry and academia with a tool to more quantitatively understand the history of computing. We propose iLORE, a data model designed to represent intricate relationships between computer system benchmarks and computer components. We detail the methods we used to implement and populate the iLORE data model using data harvested from publicly available sources. Finally, we demonstrate the validity and utility of our iLORE implementation through an analysis of the characteristics and lineage of commercial microprocessors. We encourage the research community to interact with our data and visualizations at csgenome.org. iLORE: Discovering a Lineage of Microprocessors Samuel Lewis Furman (GENERAL AUDIENCE ABSTRACT) Researchers, benchmarking organizations, and hardware manufacturers maintain repositories of computer component and performance information. However, this data is split across many isolated sources and is stored in a form that is not conducive to analysis. A centralized repository of said data would arm stakeholders across industry and academia with a tool to more quantitatively understand the history of computing.
    [Show full text]
  • Grids to Petaflops
    Thoughts on HPC Facilities Strategies for DOE Office of Science: Grids to Petaflops Rick Stevens Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago Outline • Update on NSF’s distributed terascale facility • What grid and facilities strategy is appropriate for DOE? • Limits to cluster based architectures • New paths to petaflops computing capability • Grid implications of affordable petaflops • Summary and recommendations R. Stevens Argonne National Laboratory + University of Chicago NSF TeraGrid Approach [$53M in FY01-FY03] • DTF’s project goal is deployment of a production Grid environment • staged deployment based on service priorities • first priority is a linked set of working IA-64 based clusters • immediately useful by the current NSF PACI user base • supporting current high-end applications • standard cluster and data management software • Grid software deployed in phases • basic, core, and advanced services • DTF technology choices based on application community trends • > 50% of top 20 PACI users compute on Linux clusters • development and production runs • majority of NSF MRE projects plan Data Grid environments R. Stevens Argonne National Laboratory + University of Chicago Major DTF and TeraGrid Tasks • Create management structure – Harder than we thought! • Engage major application teams – Starting with ITRs and MREs • Construct high bandwidth national network – On track • Integrate terascale hardware and software – Planning underway • Establish distributed TeraGrid operations – New Concepts needed • Deploy and harden Grid software
    [Show full text]
  • SCPH-39000 Series Service Manual
    SCPH-39000 series Reproduction Prohibited G-chassis NOTICE ADVARSEL Copyright by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. All rights reserved. No reproduced and transferred required except Eksplosjonsfare ved feilaktig skifte av batteri. Benytt samme batteritype eller en tilsvarende type anbefalt av permission by Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. No commercial use and rental required. apparatfabrikanten. Brukte batterier kasseres i henhold til fabrikantens instruksjoner. REVISIONS. VARNING This manual compiled by first edition of SCPH-39000 series design data. Explosionsfara vid felaktigt batteribyte. Använt samma batterityp eller en ekvivalent typ som rekommenderas av Design and Specification will be subject to changed without notice. The latest versions of service manual, Technical apparattillverkaren. Kassera använt batteri enligt fabrikantens instruktion. memo, Technical information should be used together. VAROITUS SAFETY-RELATED COMPONENT WARNING !! Paristo voi räjähtää, jos se on virheellisesti asennettu. Vaihda paristo ainoastaan valmistajan suosittelemaan tyyppiin. COMPONENTS IDENTIFIED BY MARK OR DOTTED LINE WITH MARK ON THE SCHEMATIC DIAGRAMS Hävitä käytetty paristo valmistajan ohjeiden mukaisesti. AND IN THE PARTS LIST ARE CRITICAL TO SAFE OPERATION. REPLACE THESE COMPONENTS WITH SONY PARTS WHOSE PART NUMBERS APPEAR AS SHOWN IN THIS MANUAL OR IN SUPPLEMENTS PUBLISHED BY SONY. SAFETY CHECK-OUT After correcting the original service problem, perform the following safety checks before releasing the set to the customer: ATTENTION AU COMPOSANT AYANT RAPPORT À LA SÉCURITÉ ! 1. Check the area of your repair for unsoldered or cold-soldered connections. Check the entire board surface for LES COMPOSANTS IDENTIFIÉS PAR UNE MARQUE SUR LES DIAGRAMMES SCHÉMATIQUES ET LA LISTE solder splashes and bridges. DES PIÈCES SONT CRITIQUES POUR LA SÈCURITÈ DE FONCTIONNEMENT.
    [Show full text]