DOCSLIB.ORG

2020-Green-Party-Con

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2020 Media Kit The Green Party of the United States was founded in 2001 as a national party, after U.S. Greens spent the 1980s and 1990s building on the local and state level, and focusing on a bottom-up electoral strategy of running and winning in local communities, and complementing that with races for state and federal office. Since 1985, Greens have won at least 1209 races, including at least 211 partisan campaigns. As of mid-April 2020, at least 129 Greens in 22 states currently hold elected office across the nation, with many more running in November 2020 elections. The Green Party of the United States has 46 affiliated state party members, plus the District of Columbia, and five organized caucuses. Different states have varying laws and party rules that define membership. In the 31 states (+ DC) that have partisan registration, 22 (+ DC) allow for, and report, Green Party registration numbers. Today there are approximately 250,000 registered Greens in these states. Many thousands more identify themselves as Green in states that don’t have voter registration by party membership. In the 2016 general election, the Green Party had ballot lines in 44 states plus DC, including the seven largest states. Voters in three additional states could write in our presidential candidate. Jill Stein, our 2016 presidential candidate, got 1.5 million votes (1.1%). International U.S. Greens are part of a global movement of Green Parties in almost 100 countries, reflecting a shared commitment to heal our planet that transcends national identities and political boundaries. Greens have run for office since the first Green Parties were organized in 1972, starting in Australia and New Zealand. Since then, Greens have been elected to thousands of seats around the globe in local, regional, national and international parliaments. On the national level, Greens currently hold 338 seats around the globe, including parliamentary seats in 19 European nations and in Australia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Congo, Madagascar, México, New Zealand and Rwanda. This number also includes 52 people from the Greens/European Free Alliance Group holding seats in the European Parliament from 11 countries. Most Greens elected at the regional, national or international level have been elected in multi- seat electorates (districts/constituencies/ridings) through systems of proportional representation (a primary electoral reform advocated by the Green Party of the United States.) However Greens have increasingly been winning direct election in single seat districts, starting with Elizabeth May to the Canadian House of Commons and Caroline Lucas to the British House of Commons - both elected first in 2010 and re-elected in subsequent elections. Since then, May has been joined by two more Green MPs - Jenica Atwinnn and Paul Manly. On the Canadian provincial level, 14 Greens hold seats in provincial parliaments in British Colombia (2), New Brunswick (3), Ontario (1), Prince Edward Island (8) Highlights on recent global electoral progress are below: Africa When two Greens were elected to the Parliament of Rwanda in 2018, they were the first opposition legislators to be elected since the genocide. This came after years of being kept off the ballot and one of their party leaders being assassinated. Asia Pacific In 2017, New Zealand Greens won eight MPs and entered into coalition government for the first time, and hold three ministerial positions, Minister for Climate Change, for Women and of Conservation and Land Information. Europe Europe experienced a “green wave” in the 2019 European Parliament elections, to become the fourth largest parliamentary group. In those elections Greens finished second in Germany and Finland, with 20.5% and 16% of the vote, respectively, and third in France with 13.5%. French Greens just followed that with breakthrough municipal victories in June 2020, winning the mayor in major cities including Lyon, Bordeaux, Strasbourg, Besançon, Poitiers, Annecy, Tours and Grenoble, and advancing to a final run-off in Marseille, Frances second largest city. Just days before the Irish Green Party Comhaontas Glas entered into a historic coalition with two other parties to govern Ireland. This now makes six countries in which Greens are currently participating in coalition governments: Austria, Finland, Ireland, Luxembourg, New Zealand and Sweden. The Green Party of the United States participates internationally as a member of the Federación de Partidos Verdes de las Americas, and globally as a charter member of the Global Greens. The next Global Greens Congress will be in Seoul, Korea in January 2022, and will be the fifth Congress of Global Greens, following Congresses in Australia (2001), Brazil (2008), Senegal (2012) and England (2017). Contacting the Green Party: Steering Committee (spokespeople): [email protected] Communications Manager: Michael O’Neil [email protected] Media Coordinators: Holly Hart and Craig Seeman [email protected] National Office: PO Box 57065, Washington, D.C. 20037 202-319-7191 [email protected] Green Party on Social Media: Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GreenPartyUS Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/greenpartyus/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/GreenPartyUS YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/GreenPartyVideos Green Party Weblinks: Green Party Homepage: http://www.gp.org Green Platform: http://www.gp.org/platform Green Party Ten Key Values: https://www.gp.org/ten_key_values_2016 Green Candidate Database & Campaign Information: https://www.gpelections.org/ Green Party News Center: http://www.gp.org/newsroom Green Pages: https://greenpagesnews.org/ Green Party Ballot Access Page: http://www.gp.org/ballot_access Green Party News and Events: https://www.gp.org/state_local_news Green Party Media Coverage: https://www.gp.org/in_the_news International: African Greens Federation: https://www.africangreens.org/ Asia Pacific Greens Federation (APGF): https://www.asiapacificgreens.org/ Federación de Partidos Verdes de las Americas: http://www.fpva.org/ Global Greens: https://www.globalgreens.org/ MEDIA ADVISORY - GREEN PARTY of the U.S. Presidential Nominating Convention Green Party of the United States to Hold Presidential Nominating Convention Online, July 11, 2020 Updated Schedule of Events for Media at the Green Party's 2020 Presidential Nominating Convention, July 9 - 11, 2020 Green Party of the United States www.gp.org For Immediate Release July 6, 2020 Contact: Michael O’Neil, Green Party Communications Manager, [email protected], 202-804-2758 Holly Hart, Green Party Media Committee Coordinator [email protected], 202-804- 2758 Craig Seeman, Green Party Media Committee Coordinator [email protected] Deanna Taylor and Tamar Yager, Green Party National Meeting Committee Coordinators, [email protected] John Andrews and Sanda Everette, Green Party Presidential Campaign Support Committee Coordinators, [email protected] • What: Green Party of the United States 2020 Presidential Nominating Convention • When: Thursday, July 9 to Saturday, July 11, 2020 • Where: Online, broadcast live to GP.org and social media platforms • 2020 Green Presidential Nominating Convention Page • Media Credentialing Application The Green Party’s 2020 Presidential Nominating Convention (PNC) will take place online due to ongoing public health concerns regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The gathering will be conducted over Zoom from July 9 to July 11, with the PNC proceedings scheduled for July 11 beginning at 12:00pm Eastern Time. The PNC proceedings will be streamed live at https://www.gp.org/live. The Green Party will broadcast the PNC live, for free on social media for all. The convention will feature candidate speeches, guest speakers (see below) and approval of the Green Party’s 2020 platform. All delegates voting from state Green Parties and identity caucuses will be conducted online via roll call from designated election reporters or through a secure electronic voting application, as determined by convention procedure. Additional media opportunities will include press conferences with national Green Party leaders, 2020 Green candidates and officeholders, and the Green Party presidential and vice-presidential nominees. Press conferences will be hosted on a dedicated Zoom conference line. Online workshops and panels will be offered to convention registrants throughout the week. Please register on the media credentialing page if you are interested in covering program events and news conferences. Candidates Seeking the Green Party Presidential Nomination Media Credentialing Application MEDIA MUST BE CREDENTIALED IN ADVANCE TO RECEIVE ZOOM INFO Schedule of Press Events Eastern Daylight Time Details for all events are subject to change. An final advisory with updates and candidate and speaker details will be published the week of the convention. Thursday, July 9, 4:00 pm. Press Conference welcoming media to the Green Party's 2020 Presidential Nominating Convention, featuring party officials and convention organizers. Friday, July 10, 10:00 am. Press Conference with Green Party candidates for federal office. (participants TBA) Friday, July 10, 11:00 am. Press Conference with Green Party candidates for local and state offices. (participants TBA) Friday, July 10, 1:00 pm. Press Conference with Green Party officeholders (participants TBA) Friday, July 10, 2:00 pm. Press Conference with Green Party candidates for federal office. (participants TBA) Saturday, July 11, immediately following the convention, Press Conference with Green Party presidential and vice-presidential nominee Confirmed 2020 speakers: Ajamu
Recommended publications
  • June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA

    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA

    June 2004 GPCA Plenary June 5-6, 2004 Sacramento City College, Sacramento, CA Saturday Morning - 6/5/04 Delegate Orientation Ellen Maisen: Review of consensus-seeking process Reminder of why we seek consensus vs. simply voting: Voting creates factions, while consensus builds community spirit. Facilitators: Magali Offerman, Jim Shannon Notes: Adrienne Prince and Don Eichelberger (alt.) Vibes: Leslie Dinkin, Don Eichelberger Time Keeper: Ed Duliba Confirming of Agenda Ratification of minutes, discussion of electoral reform, and platform plank have all been moved to Sunday. Time-sensitive agenda items were given priority. Consent Calendar Jo Chamberlain, SMC: Media bylaws concerns will also be discussed Sunday a.m. Clarification on “point of process” for Consent Calendar: when concerns are brought up, the item in question becomes dropped from the calendar and can be brought up for discussion and voting later in the plenary as time allows. I. GPUS Post-First-Round Ballot Voting Instructions Proposal - Nanette Pratini, Jonathan Lundell, Jim Stauffer Regarding convention delegate voting procedure: “If a delegate’s assigned candidate withdraws from the race or if subsequent votes are required…delegates will vote using their best judgment…as to what the voters who selected their assigned candidate would choose.” Floor rules in process of being approved by national CC. Will be conducted as a series of rounds, announced state by state. For first round, delegates are tied to the candidates as represented in the primary. If someone wins and does not want to accept the vote, subsequent rounds will vote. If a willing candidate gets a majority, they will be nominated, If “no candidate” (an option) wins, there will be an IRV election for an endorsement instead of a nomination.
  • Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign

    Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein's 2012 Green Party Campaign

    45 Recognizing the Rhetorics of Feminist Action: Activist Literacy and Dr. Jill Stein’s 2012 Green Party Campaign Virginia Crisco Abstract: Scholars such as Nancy Welch and Susan Jarratt argue that Neoliberalism shapes how everyday citizens are able to take action. Using what Jacquelyn Jones Royster and Gesa Kirsch call “social circulation,” I analyze how Dr. Jill Stein, the presidential candidate for the Green Party in 2012, used “whatever spaces are left” to challenge the dominant two party system, particularly in relation to the pres- idential debates. I argue that Stein demonstrates an activist literacy disposition that positions her to use the spaces, the literate and rhetorical means, and oppor- tunities for storytelling to foster social action in our neoliberal climate. Keywords: neoliberalism, social circulation, activist literacy, third party politics In Living Room: Teaching Public Writing in a Privatized World, Nancy Welch argues that neoliberalism has changed not only the topics available for public discussion in the pursuit of making socio-political change, but the venues for having those discussions, as they have also become increasingly privatized. As an example, Welch refects on her experiences advocating for her husband’s health care to their insurance company. She describes the multiple letters she had gotten from her insurance company saying their appeal for his care had been denied, using the same phrases again and again, as if her carefully re- searched and rhetorical letters were not even being read. This leads Welch to question the amount of power we as teachers and scholars of writing give to language and rhetoric: These are rhetorical strategies that, mostly in the abstract, have given me comfort – comfort in the belief that I really can wield power in language, that I can empower my students, particularly those subor- dinate by gender, race, sexuality, and class, to do the same.
  • GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation

    GREEN YOUTH for a GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation

    GREEN YOUTH FOR A GLOBAL GREEN CHANGE Documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress Berlin, 8th to 14th of August 2010 Dear readers! 3 A short history of the Global Young Greens 4 HISTORY 2nd Congress 8 programmE 9 Regional Meetings 10 Workshops 12 the perspectives of small content scale farming and the agricultural issues 16 Green New Deal – A Concept for a Global Economic Change? 17 Impressions 18 General Assembly of GYG Congress Berlin 2010 20 Summary of our Structure Reform 21 GYG in Action 22 Passed Proposals 23 Statements 25 Participants 26 Introduction of the new Steering Committee 28 Plans 32 THANK-YOU‘S 30 IMPRINT 31 2 global young greens—Congress 2010 Dear readers! We proudly present to you the documentation of the 2nd Global Young Greens Congress held in Berlin from 8th to 14th of August 2010! More than 100 participants from over 50 countries spent five days of discussing as well as exchanging opinions and experiences from their homecountries in order to get closer together and fight with “Youth Power for a Global Green Change“. Workshops, fishbowl discussions and a world café were organised as parts of the congress. The debated topics were endless – reaching from economics and gender issues to social justice, peace and conflicts and - of course - climate change. After three days of debating, two days of General Assem- bly followed. In this, new structures were adopted as well as several topical proposals to form a wider political platform. With this documentation, we are trying to show what the congress was about and what was behind.
  • October 2005.Qxd

    October 2005.Qxd

    Hill & Lake Press Serving the East Isles, Lowry Hill, Kenwood Isles, and Cedar Isles Dean Neighborhoods VOLUME 29 NUMBER 10 OCTOBER 22, 2005 ISLES BIKE TRAIL REPLACED West Bay and North Arm Greening Up Chris Wiencke MPRB Planning The unseasonably warm weather this fall extended the growing season, offering a grace period in which the newly planted grass around Lake of the Isles’ west bay could take hold. Parkland disguised as an unsightly con- struction zone for the past two summers is beginning to look like a park once again. Extremely wet weather has subjected the recently completed improvements to a rigorous test, a test they have passed with flying colors. Recent torrential rains would have completely flooded the parkland surrounding the west bay and north arm; today it remains high and dry. Though the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board’s efforts to renovate Lake of the Isles Regional Park—a project spanning several years—in 2005 were limited by inadequate funding, much has been accom- plished this construction season. The parkland around the west bay and north arm, so prone to flooding in recent years, has been filled in above the 100-year flood level, then graded and seeded. The north arm, not yet green at this writing, was seeded later than the west bay. Depending on weather conditions, that area may not look like parkland until spring. Bike trail replaced Lake of the Isles after October 2005 rain Lake Photos by Dorothy Childers The replacement of the bike trail may be the most enthusiastically hailed development of all.
  • Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General

    Taker GREEN PARTY of CALIFORNIA June 2017 General

    Mimi Newton, Sacramento GA Note- Taker GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA June 2017 General Assembly Minutes Sacramento, June 17-18, 2017 ATTENDEES: Name County Sacramento Delegate status Present/Absent Brett Dixon Alameda Delegate P Greg Jan Alameda Delegate P James McFadden Alameda Not delegate P Jan Arnold Alameda Delegate P Laura Wells Alameda Delegate P Maxine Daniel Alameda Delegate P Michael Rubin Alameda Delegate P Pam Spevack Alameda Delegate P Paul Rea Alameda Delegate P Phoebe Sorgen Alameda Delegate P Erik Rydberg Butte Delegate P Bert Heuer Contra Costa Not delegate P Brian Deckman Contra Costa Not delegate P Meleiza Figueroa Contra Costa Not delegate P Tim Laidman Contra Costa Delegate P Megan Buckingham Fresno Delegate P David Cobb Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Jim Smith Humboldt Delegate P Kelsey Reedy Humboldt Not delegate P Kyle Dust Humboldt Delegate P Matt Smith-Caggiano Humboldt Delegate/Alt P Cassidy Sheppard Kern Delegate P Penny Sheppard Kern Delegate P Ajay Rai Los Angeles Delegate P Andrea Houtman Los Angeles Not delegate P Angel Orellana Los Angeles Delegate P Angelina Saucedo Los Angeles Delegate P Cesar Gonzalez Los Angeles Not delegate P Christopher Cruz Los Angeles Delegate P Daniel Mata Los Angeles Delegate P Doug Barnett Los Angeles Delegate P Fernando Ramirez Los Angeles Delegate P James Lauderdale Los Angeles Not delegate P Jimmy Rivera Los Angeles Delegate P Kenneth Mejia Los Angeles Delegate P Lisa Salvary Los Angeles Delegate P Liz Solis Los Angeles Delegate P Marla Bernstein Los Angeles Delegate P Martin Conway
  • 2014 Green Party Platform

    2014 Green Party Platform

    Platform 2014 Green Party of the United States Approved by the Green National Committee July 2014 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
  • 2010 Green Party Platform

    2010 Green Party Platform

    Platform 2010 Green Party of the United States As Adopted by the Green National Committee September 2010 About the Green Party The Green Party of the United States is a federation of state Green Parties. Committed to environmentalism, non-violence, social justice and grassroots organizing, Greens are renewing democracy without the support of corporate donors. Greens provide real solutions for real problems. Whether the issue is universal health care, corporate globalization, alternative energy, election reform or decent, living wages for workers, Greens have the courage and independence necessary to take on the powerful corporate interests. The Federal Elec - tions Commission recognizes the Green Party of the United States as the official Green Party National Com - mittee. We are partners with the European Federation of Green Parties and the Federation of Green Parties of the Americas. The Green Party of the United States was formed in 2001 from of the older Association of State Green Parties (1996-2001). Our initial goal was to help existing state parties grow and to promote the formation of parties in all 51 states and colonies. Helping state parties is still our primary goal. As the Green Party National Com - mittee we will devote our attention to establishing a national Green presence in politics and policy debate while continuing to facilitate party growth and action at the state and local level. Green Party growth has been rapid since our founding and Green candidates are winning elections through - out the United States. State party membership has more than doubled. At the 2000 Presidential Nominating Convention we nominated Ralph Nader and Winona LaDuke for our Presidential ticket.
  • The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004

    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004

    The Case for Fraud in Ohio Election 2004 I. Voter Suppression A. Overly Restrictive Registration Requirements B. Incompetence in Processing Registrations C. Challenges to New Registrants on Insufficient Grounds D. Misinformation About Voting Status/Location/Date E. Voter Intimidation F. Voting Machine Shortages/Malfunctions G. Overly Restrictive Rules & Incorrect Procedure Regarding Provisional Ballots H. Poorly Designed Absentee Ballots Caused Voters to Mark Incorrect Candidate II. Access to Voting Systems Before Election Violates Protocol III. A Third-Rate Burglary in Toledo IV. Suspect Results A. Registration Irregularities B. Exceptionally High Voter Turnout C. More Votes than Voters D. Exceptionally High Rates of Undervotes E. High Rate of Overvotes Due to Ballots Pre-Punched for Bush? F. The Kerry/Connally Discrepancy G. Discrepancy between Exit Polls & Tabulated Votes V. Restricting Citizen Observation & Access to Public Documents A. Warren County Lockdown B. Restricting Citizen Access to Election Records VI. What Went Wrong with the Recounts/Investigation of Vote Irregularities A. Chain of Custody of Voting Machines & Materials Violated B. Failure to Follow Established Procedures for Recounts C. Failure to Allow Recount Observers to Fully Examine Materials D. Secretary of State Blackwell has Failed to Answer Questions VII. Recount Reveals Significant Problems VIII. Methods of Election Fraud A. Stuffing the Ballot Box B. Touchscreen voting machines appear to have been set to “Bush” as Default C. Computers pre-programmed to ‘adjust’ vote count in Bush’s favor? D. Tampering with the Tabulators: Evidence of Hacking in Real-Time? IX. Additional Observations A. Irregular/Impossible Changes in Exit Polls over time on Election Night I.
  • 2004 Campaign Finance Summary

    2004 Campaign Finance Summary

    STATE OF MINNESOTA CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD 2004 CAMPAIGN FINANCE SUMMARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVE CANDIDATES JUDICIAL CANDIDATES SPECIAL ELECTION DISTRICT 37 CONSTITUTIONAL AND SENATE OFFICE HOLDERS OTHER REGISTERED PRINCIPAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEES POLITICAL PARTY UNITS POLITICAL COMMITTEES AND POLITICAL FUNDS Issued: June 20, 2005 (data as of May 18, 2005) CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND PUBLIC DISCLOSURE BOARD Suite 190, Centennial Office Building 658 Cedar Street St. Paul MN 55155-1603 Telephone: 651/296-5148 or 800/657-3889 Fax: 651/296-1722 For TTY/TDD communication contact us through the Minnesota Relay Service at 800/627-3529 Email: [email protected] Worldwide web site: http://www.cfboard.state.mn.us EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - ELECTION YEAR 2004 The Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board is charged with the administration of the Ethics in Government Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 10A. During an election year campaign committees of candidates who file for office are required to file three Reports of Receipts and Expenditures: pre-primary, pre-general, and year-end. Campaign committees of candidates whose office is not up for election and candidates who chose not to file for office, file one year-end report. Offices open for election in 2004 were: House of Representatives and certain Judicial seats. Political party units, political committees, and political funds that attempt to influence state elections also filed pre-primary, pre-general, and year-end reports. This summary is based on reports for election year 2004, as filed with the Board by principal campaign committees of candidates for 134 state representative seats (311 candidates filed), 38 candidates for elective judicial seats, and a special election in Senate District 37.
  • Ten Stories About Election ‘06 What You Won’T Learn from the Polls

    Ten Stories About Election ‘06 What You Won’T Learn from the Polls

    Ten Stories About Election ‘06 What You Won’t Learn From the Polls Released November 6, 2006 Contents: Page 1) What Do Votes Have to Do With It: Democrats majorities may not win seat majorities 2 2) Monopoly Politics: How on Thursday we will predict nearly all House winners… for 2008 3 3) The Untouchables: The growing list of House members on cruise control 5 4) The Gerrymander and Money Myths: The real roots of non-competition and GOP advantage 12 5) The GOP Turnout Machine Myth: If not real in 2004, why would it be now? 17 6) The 50-State Question: Measuring Dean’s gamble in 2006… and in 2016 18 7) Downballot GOP Blues: What a Democratic wave could mean for state legislatures 20 8) Of Spoilers and Minority Rule: Where split votes could swing seats – and already have 21 9) The Democrats’ Paradox: Why a win could shake up House leaders & the presidential race 24 10) Slouching Toward Diversity: Who’s to gain when a few more white men lose? 26 Appendix: 1) Incumbency Bumps: Measuring the bonus for House Members, 1996-2004 29 2) Horserace Talk: The inside track on projecting the 2006 Congressional races 30 3) Open Seat Analysis: How Monopoly Politics measures 2006 open seats 32 FairVote 6930 Carroll Avenue, Suite 610 Takoma Park, MD 20912 www.fairvote.org (301) 270-4616 What Do Votes Have to Do With It? Democrats’ Probable National Majorities May Not Result in Control of Congress On November 7, Americans will elect all 435 Members of the U.S.
  • Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines

    Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines

    CALTECH/MIT VOTING TECHNOLOGY PROJECT A multi-disciplinary, collaborative project of the California Institute of Technology – Pasadena, California 91125 and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology – Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 AUDITING TECHNOLOGY FOR ELECTRONIC VOTING MACHINES Sharon B. Cohen MIT Key words: DRE, voting machine security, electronic voting, electronic voting machines, auditing technology VTP WORKING PAPER #46 May 2005 Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Engineering and Master of Engineering in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology May 19, 2005 Copyright 2005 Sharon B. Cohen. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis and to grant others the right to do so. Author_________________________________________________________________ Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science May 19, 2005 Certified by___________________________________________________________ Ted Selker Thesis Supervisor Accepted by____________________________________________________________ Arthur C. Smith Chairman, Department Committee on Graduate Theses Auditing Technology for Electronic Voting Machines by Sharon B. Cohen Submitted to the Department of Electrical Engineering
  • Open Access Version Via Utrecht University Repository

    Open Access Version Via Utrecht University Repository

    NATIONAL IDENTITY AND COSMOPOLITAN COMMUNITY AMONG DUTCH GREEN PARTY MEMBERS Written by Matthias Schmal and supervised by Luc Lauwers: A thesis part of the Master’s program Cultural Anthropology: Sustainable Citizenship at Utrecht University. August 2017 2 Green Communities National Identity and Cosmopolitan Community Among Dutch Green Party Members A thesis as part of the Master’s program Cultural Anthropology: Sustainable Citizenship at Utrecht University. Written by Matthias Schmal, supervised by Luc Lauwers. Cover by Matthias Schmal. August 4, 2017 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 6 METHODS .............................................................................................................................................. 11 Participant Observation .................................................................................................................... 11 Interviewing ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Online and Media Ethnography ........................................................................................................ 14 A LOST SENSE OF COMMUNITY ...........................................................................................................