DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyrighted Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Copyrighted Material bindex.qxd 08/23/05 9:30 AM Page 277 INDEX : Achillas, 45–47, 67, 73, 127, 132, 134 Antipater, 131–135, 137, 139, 150, 152, 237 Alexandria campaign, 75–82, 87–89, 90 Nile Delta battle and, 143 execution of, 89, 107, 182 Antonius, Primus, 245–246 rivalry with Arsinoe, 87, 89 Antony, Gaius, 19, 38, 48–49 Acilius, Lucius, 12, 217, 240 Antony, Mark, 2, 13, 16, 19, 21, 26, 41, 56, Acta Diurnia (newspaper), 13, 148 79, 168, 169, 225, 228, 230, 243 Actium, Battle of, 238, 239 Caesar and, xiii, 59, 171, 194, 204, 230 Acts of the Apostles, 257 Caesar’s assassination and, 211–213, Aemilius, Marcus, 27 215–221, 224 Afranius, Lucius, xv, 16, 17, 18, 29, 30, 33, Caesar’s assassination aftermath and, 92, 173 215–221, 224 African campaign, 171–173, 208 Caesar’s funeral oration by, 216, 217 African Triumph, 174, 185–186, 195 on Caesar’s generosity, 187 Agrippa, Marcus, 224, 236, 238 Cleopatra’s children with, 185, 236 Alaexander Helios, 239 Cleopatra’s relationship with, 51, 146, Albinus, Decimus Brutus, 200, 206–207, 185, 233–234, 236, 237 212–213, 215, 220, 224, 226 Cleopatra’s son with Caesar and, 153 Alesia, Siege of, 177 military abilities of, 236–237 Alexander the Great, 40, 62, 119 mutinous troops and, xv, 4, 37–38, 48, Alexandria, 3–7, 58–60, 73–85, 113–125, 226 138, 164, 167, 170, 181, 209, 211, 233 Parthian campaign of, 236–237, 246 Antony’s pseudo-Triumph in, 237 Pharsalus battle and, 26–27, 33 Caesar’s negotiations and, 65–69, 71–73, physical appearance of, 26 126–127 pseudo-Triumph of, 237 Caesar’s prolonged conflict in, 2, 3–4, as ruler of Rome, 48–49, 50–51, 67, 125–126 150–151, 170–171 Caesar’s siege of, 81–83, 85, 87–93, in Second Triumvirate, 227–238 100–101, 107–109, 112, 128, 133, 136 self-indulgence of, 49–50 causeway fightingCOPYRIGHTED and, 122–125 suicideMATERIAL of, 238 Cleopatra’s arrival in, 70 Apollodorus, 70–72 description of, 61–64 Apollonius, 57–58, 68, 141 Jewish residents of, 63–64, 119–120 Appian, xv, xvi, 27, 33, 52, 68, 105, 106, street fighting and fire in, 78–83, 138, 139 124, 145, 147, 166, 176, 186–187, 191, surrender to Caesar of, 145–146 225, 231, 234, 257 water supply of, 90–92, 109, 113 on Caesar’s assassination, 201, 204, 205, Alexandrian Triumph, 174, 175, 182, 184, 206, 209–210 238, 246 on Caesar’s Triumphs, 177, 181, 182, 185, Alexandrian War, The (Hirtius), 56, 96, 184 186 Antigonus, 152 on Pharnaces campaign and escape, 159, Antiochus, 226, 247 160, 165 277 bindex.qxd 08/23/05 9:30 AM Page 278 278 index Appius Claudius (surname Pulcher), 14, 15, as Urban Praetor, 198, 201, 220 19, 42 wife Porcia and, 207, 208, 221, 230 Aquila, Pontius, 186, 214 Brutus, Marcus Junius, Sr., 28, 29 Archimedes, 63 Bush, George H. W., 1 Aretas, 132 Ariarathes, 154 Caesar, Julius, 12, 22, 46, 51, 62, 97, 128, Ariobarzanes, 98, 154 130, 167–68, 197, 219, 227, 229, 234 Aristobulus, 152 African campaign of, 171–173, 208 Arles colony, 192–194, 195, 215, 216, 226, Alexandrian prolonged conflict and. 227, 229, 232, 246 See Alexandria Armenian campaigns, 243, 244 Arsinoe and, 73, 81–82, 87, 146 Arrian, xvi assassination of, 198–214, 217, 219, 231 Arsinoe, 66, 73, 90, 126 Batavian bodyguard of, 5–6, 139–140 Achillas and, 87, 89, 107 battle formation of, 101 Alexandrian Triumph and, 182, 184, 238 betrayals of trust of, 126 Cleopatra’s ordered execution of, 146 Brutus and, 29–32, 50, 126 escape from Caesar of, 81–82 calendar of, xvi, 147–148, 188–89 exile of, 146, 182 clemency of, 59, 146, 154, 155, 180, 198, kidnapping of, 2, 6, 75 201, 202, 203, 206, 235 Nile campaign and, 137 Cleopatra’s relationship with, xiii, 2, 43, Ptolemy and, 128 65, 70–71, 77, 93, 127, 146–148, 150, Asander, 156–157, 162, 165–166, 168 159, 177, 183, 205 Attia (niece of Caesar), 224 Cleopatra’s son with. See Caesarion Atticus, Titus, 15, 220 Commentaries of. See Caesar’s Augustus. See Octavian Commentaries as consul, 13, 48, 64, 73, 148 Balbus, Lucius Cornelius, xiv, 27, 56–57, 216 corruption charges against, 13 Balbus, Titus Ampius, 53, 203 Deiotarus and, 155–157, 168 Barzapharnes, 234 Dictator title of, 48, 176, 202–204 Basilus, Munucius, 214 on Egyptian army’s spirit, 86 Bassus, Lucillus, 161 Egyptian fleet burning by, 79–80, 82, 107 Batavian bodyguard, 5–6, 139–140 Egyptian royal family and, 73, 146–147 “Battered Helmet, The” (Schwarzkopf), 1 funeral of, 216, 217–218 Beneventum region, 232–233, 239–240, 246, good luck of, 89 247 homosexuality rumor about, 177–178 Berenice, 41, 87, 146 honors of, 194, 202 Bibulus (son of Porcia), 208, 217, 221 “I came, I saw, I conquered” dispatch of, Bibulus, Marcus Calpurnius, 13, 207 xiii, 185 Boudicca, xiii, 243, 250 Inner Harbor battle and, 115–119 Briganticus, 249 Jews and, 152–153 British Revolt, 243–244 memoirs of. See Caesar’s Commentaries Brutus, Decimus, 17 money and, 65–66, 69, 149, 166, 186–187 Brutus, Junius, 28, 203 mutinous troops and, xiv–xv, 30, 32, 34, Brutus, Marcus Junius, 33, 44, 145, 173, 190 66, 92, 151, 171 Caesar and, 29–32, 50, 126 naval operations and, 110–111, 128–29 Caesar assassination and, 198, 200–201, night operations of, 74, 161 203, 205–211, 213–215, 225, 226 Nile campaign and, 136–143, 211 Caesar’s assassination aftermath and, 216, oratorical skills of, 4, 6–7, 115 217, 218–221, 223, 228–229, 233 Parthian plans of, 199, 203, 204, 209, 222, Cassius and, 31, 197, 218, 230–231 224, 225 death of, 230 Pharnaces and, 96, 106, 149, 153–160, family background of, 28 166 Philippi battles and, 193, 230, 234 Pharos Island fighting and, 120–121 bindex.qxd 08/23/05 9:30 AM Page 279 index 279 Pompey and, 14, 15-16, 46, 49, 52–56, Carrhae, Battle of, 14, 19, 31, 52, 57, 196, 58–59, 96, 198 (see also civil war; 230, 237 Pharsalus, Battle of) revenge for loss of, 199 Pompey’s assassination and, 45, 65 Casca, Gaius, 200 Pompey’s property and, 170–171, 235 Casca, Publius Servilius, 200, 209–210 Pontic Triumph of, 174, 184–185 Cassius, Gaius, 52, 190, 196, 201 as primary source, 257–258 as Brutus’s brother-in-law, 31, 197, 218, prostitution policy of, 122 230–231 Ptolemies and, 40–41, 72–73, 126–127, 149 Caesar’s assassination and, 198, 200–202, reinforcements and, 109–112, 125, 128, 204–211, 213–214, 225, 226, 230 131–132 Caesar’s assassination aftermath and, Roman imperial succession and, 248 216–221, 223, 228, 233 Roman political problems and, 150–151, Eastern campaign of, 228–229, 234 170 Philippi battles and, 230, 234 Roman Senate and, 202, 203, 205, 206, son’s coming-of-age party and, 197–198, 212, 214 200, 206 Roman traffic regulations of, 148 suicide of, 230 Rubicon crossing by, 1, 16, 19, 38, 50, 57 Cassius, Lucius, 52–53, 54, 145, 193 6th Ferrata Legion and, xv, xvii, 2, 12–13, reinforcements for Caesar and, 66–67, 77, 16–17, 33–37, 94, 150, 169, 170, 186, 96–97, 100, 109 217 Cassius Dio, xvi, 65–66, 76, 88, 95, 114, Spanish campaign of, xv, 187, 189–192, 124, 134, 136, 156, 159, 165, 167, 173, 195, 236 176, 178, 186, 259 Triumphs of, 173–186, 189, 195, 222, 236, on Alexandrian negotiations, 72–73 238, 246 on Caesar’s assassination, 204, 214 two new legions of, 38 on Caesar’s Triumphs, 177–178, 182 wives and affairs of, 28–29, 183, 184, 200, Castor, Tarcondarius, 155 218 (see also subhead Cleopatra’s Cato the Younger (Marcus Cato), 21, 22, 28, relationship with above) 33, 57, 76, 190 Zela battle and, 161–163, 250 as Brutus’s father-in-law, 207 Caesar, Sextus, 150, 151, 153 Caesar’s African campaign and, 173 Caesar Augustus. See Octavian on greed of senators, 40 Caesarion (son of Caesar and Cleopatra), suicide of, 173, 186 153, 182, 204, 205, 212, 233 cavalry troops, 5 as king of Egypt, 237, 239 Cerialis, Petilius, 249 Caesar’s Commentaries, xvi, 15, 56–57, 96, Cicero, Marcus Tullius, xvi, 6, 14, 15, 16, 22, 216 190, 202 on Dyrrhachium battle, 37 advice to Cassius and Brutus of, 218–220 on Egyptian campaign, 73–74, 76 Caesar and, 17, 50, 57, 203 gaps in, xiv–xv Cilician Triumph of, 174 Hirtius and, 133–134 daughter Tullia and, 55–56, 224 on Pharsalus battle, 33 execution of, 228 Caesius, Marcus, 26 opposition to Antony of, 224, 227 Caienus, Lucius, 12, 84, 85, 240 as primary source, 258–259 Calenus, Quintus Fufius, 38 as provincial governor, 20, 55, 57, 97 Caligula, Emperor, 56, 176 Cilician Gates, Battle of the, 236 Calpurnia (wife of J. Caesar), 183, 184 Cilician Legions, 97 Calvinus, Gnaeus Domitius. See Domitius Cilician Triumph, 174 camp followers, 121–122 Cimber, Lucius Tillius, 198–200, 214 Cantabrian War, 248 Cinna, Gaius Helvius, 205 Canuleius, Gaius, 27 Cinna, Lucius Cornelius, 200, 214 Capys, 216 Civilis, Julius, 249 Carfulenus, 142–143 Civilis Revolt, 249 bindex.qxd 08/23/05 9:30 AM Page 280 280 index civil war (49–45 b.c.), xvi, 8, 15–29, 42, 43, Cremona, Battle of, 246 46, 49, 66, 68, 126, 187, 219, 235 Curio, Gaius, 49–50 Caesar’s generosity and, 146 African defeat of, 57, 76, 128, 169, 185 Dyrrhachium battle and, xv, xvi, 22, 37, Cypros, 131 94, 128 ending of, 169, 173, 187, 191–192, Darius, 103, 168 195–196, 196, 235 Deiotaran Legions, 97–98, 104–105, 156, Gallic Triumph and, 182 166, 225–226 in modern context, 1–2 Cassius’s trapping of, 228 6th Legion and, 16, 22, 169–170 Zela battle and, 163 Spanish campaign of, xv, 187, 189–192 Deiotarus, 94, 96–99, 101, 155–157, 168 troop discontent and, 148–149 Dinocrates, 62 See also Pharsalus, Battle of Dioscorides, 75–76, 127–128, 134–138 Claudianus, Marcus Livius Drusus, 56 Dolabella, Lucius, 150 Claudius, Emperor, 56, 180, 207 Dolabella, Publius, 22, 55–56, 202, 224–226 Cleopatra VII, 32, 41, 50, 87, 136, 149, 228, death of, 228 233 Domitian, Emperor, 35 Alexandrian fighting and, 74–76 Domitius, 38, 54, 66, 94–101 Alexandrian Triumph and, 184 Nicopolis battle and, 101, 103–106, 151, Alexandria negotiations and, 67–69, 153 71–73, 126–127 Pharnaces’s campaign against, 100–101, Antony’s children with, 185, 236 157, 158 Antony’s relationship with, 51, 146, 185, reinforcements for Caesar and, 96–100, 233–234, 236, 237 109, 125, 131 Arsinoe and, 146, 184 Drusus, 56, 243, 250 Caesar’s assassination and, 211–212 Durrës (Dyrrhachium), xv, 168 Caesar’s child with.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen
    Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2012 © 2012 Howard Chen All rights reserved ABSTRACT Breakthrough and Concealment: The Formulaic Dynamics of Character Behavior in Lucan Howard Chen This dissertation analyzes the three main protagonists of Lucan’s Bellum Civile through their attempts to utilize, resist, or match a pattern of action which I call the “formula.” Most evident in Caesar, the formula is a cycle of alternating states of energy that allows him to gain a decisive edge over his opponents by granting him the ability of perpetual regeneration. However, a similar dynamic is also found in rivers, which thus prove to be formidable adversaries of Caesar in their own right. Although neither Pompey nor Cato is able to draw on the Caesarian formula successfully, Lucan eventually associates them with the river-derived variant, thus granting them a measure of resistance (if only in the non-physical realm). By tracing the development of the formula throughout the epic, the dissertation provides a deeper understanding of the importance of natural forces in Lucan’s poem as well as the presence of an underlying drive that unites its fractured world. Table of Contents Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................ vi Introduction ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mountainous Crimea: a Frontier Zone of Ancient Civilization
    Mountainous Crimea: A Frontier Zone of Ancient Civilization Natalia G. Novičenkova Mountainous Crimea, Taurica, was a region separated from the ancient cen- ters of the peninsula and the communication lines connecting Chersonesos and the Bosporan Kingdom. This region is not particularly well studied and therefore it has been impossible to trace its development in Antiquity, and to clarify its role in the history of ancient Crimea as a whole. The geographical conditions of the Mountainous Crimea determined that the ancient population of this area dwelled almost entirely on the main moun- tain range. From a modern point of view it seems unlikely that a mountain ridge could unite a population into a single ethnic group instead of splitting it into several distinct segments. Yet our evidence from Antiquity suggests the opposite. Thus, for example, Plinius the Elder wrote that the Scytho-Taurians inhabited the range (Plin. NH 4.85). This evidence has evoked bewilderment among scholars1 because this part of Crimea has the harshest weather condi- tions and is covered with snow from November to May almost every year. The main mountain range of Crimea is formed by a chain of plateaus situ- ated at about 1,000-1,500 m above sea level. Here an ancient road system was laid out uniting all the mountain passes into a single system of communica- tion.2 The plateaus with their alpine meadows served as excellent summer pastures. They were effectively protected against any threats from outside. The Taurians, who inhabited the mountain range, were not obliged to strug- gle for the steppe’s nomad territories or to drive their cattle for hundreds of kilometers.
    [Show full text]
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Note : Geographical landmarks are listed under the proper name itself: for “Cape Sepias” or “Mt. Athos” see “Sepias” or “Athos.” When a people and a toponym share the same base, see under the toponym: for “Thessalians” see “Thessaly.” Romans are listed according to the nomen, i.e. C. Julius Caesar. With places or people mentioned once only, discretion has been used. Abdera 278 Aeaces II 110, 147 Abydus 222, 231 A egae 272–273 Acanthus 85, 207–208, 246 Aegina 101, 152, 157–158, 187–189, Acarnania 15, 189, 202, 204, 206, 251, 191, 200 347, 391, 393 Aegium 377, 389 Achaia 43, 54, 64 ; Peloponnesian Aegospotami 7, 220, 224, 228 Achaia, Achaian League 9–10, 12–13, Aemilius Paullus, L. 399, 404 54–56, 63, 70, 90, 250, 265, 283, 371, Aeolis 16–17, 55, 63, 145, 233 375–380, 388–390, 393, 397–399, 404, Aeschines 281, 285, 288 410 ; Phthiotic Achaia 16, 54, 279, Aeschylus 156, 163, 179 286 Aetoli Erxadieis 98–101 Achaian War 410 Aetolia, Aetolian League 12, 15, 70, Achaius 382–383, 385, 401 204, 250, 325, 329, 342, 347–348, Acilius Glabrio, M. 402 376, 378–380, 387, 390–391, 393, Acragas 119, COPYRIGHTED165, 259–261, 263, 266, 39MATERIAL6–397, 401–404 352–354, 358–359 Agariste 113, 117 Acrocorinth 377, 388–389 Agathocles (Lysimachus ’ son) 343, 345 ; Acrotatus 352, 355 (King of Sicily) 352–355, 358–359; Actium 410, 425 (King of Bactria) 413–414 Ada 297 Agelaus 391, 410 A History of Greece: 1300 to 30 BC, First Edition. Victor Parker.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A study of the client kings in the early Roman period Everatt, J. D. How to cite: Everatt, J. D. (1972) A study of the client kings in the early Roman period, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10140/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk .UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM Department of Classics .A STUDY OF THE CLIENT KINSS IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE J_. D. EVERATT M.A. Thesis, 1972. M.A. Thesis Abstract. J. D. Everatt, B.A. Hatfield College. A Study of the Client Kings in the early Roman Empire When the city-state of Rome began to exert her influence throughout the Mediterranean, the ruling classes developed friendships and alliances with the rulers of the various kingdoms with whom contact was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A study of the client kings in the early Roman period Everatt, J. D. How to cite: Everatt, J. D. (1972) A study of the client kings in the early Roman period, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10140/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk .UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM Department of Classics .A STUDY OF THE CLIENT KINSS IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE J_. D. EVERATT M.A. Thesis, 1972. M.A. Thesis Abstract. J. D. Everatt, B.A. Hatfield College. A Study of the Client Kings in the early Roman Empire When the city-state of Rome began to exert her influence throughout the Mediterranean, the ruling classes developed friendships and alliances with the rulers of the various kingdoms with whom contact was made.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bosporan Army” and “The Army on the Bosporus” in the Time of Mithradates Vi Eupator, King of Pontus
    Fasciculi Archaeologiae Historicae, 2014, 27, s. 11-19 FASCICULI ARCHAEOLOGIAE HISTORICAE FASC. XXVII, PL ISSN 0860-0007 MARIUSZ MIELCZAREK “THE BOSPORAN ARMY” AND “THE ARMY ON THE BOSPORUS” IN THE TIME OF MITHRADATES VI EUPATOR, KING OF PONTUS Abstract: During the reign of Mithradates VI Eupator, king of Pontus, the Cimmerian Bosporus was incorporated to the kingdom of Pontus. Detachments of the Mithradatic army were located on the Bosporus. The military forces of which the Bosporans disposed of also stayed on the Bosporus. The organization of the military forces as well as soldiers’ arms and armour are discussed. Special attention is devoted to the epigraphic material which is evidently the most important piece of evidence relating to the military history of the Bosporus of Mithradatic times. Keywords: Bosporus, Mithradates VI Eupator, army, arms and armour About 107 BCE Bosporan Kingdom (map 1) lost its inde- which took place during the first Mithradatic war against pendence1. The Bosporus had come under the rule of Mithra- Rome and just after, indicates that after subjugation to dates VI Eupator, king of Pontus2 (Fig. 1). Units of Mithra- Mithradates, significant military forces stayed in disposi- dates’3 army were located in the Bosporan centers 4, as had been tion of the Bosporans7. Appian wrote that a strong fleet and done in other north Pontic cities5 incorporated into Mithra- numerous Pontic forces were ordered against Bosporus8. dates’ sphere of interest at the end of the second century BCE. On the other hand Appian’s account is very interesting, as Appian’s passage about the “rebellion” of the Bosporans6, the economic9 situation of the Bosporus was far from being prosperous before its incorporation to Mithradates VI’s possessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War in Rome and the End of the Roman Republic
    Civil War in Rome and the End of the Roman Republic © Student Handouts, Inc. www.studenthandouts.com Tiberius Gracchus and Land Reform The lower classes (plebeians) were suffering. 133 BCE – Tiberius Gracchus was elected as tribune He promised land reform of the plebeians Tiberius Gracchus told the people: “You fight and die to give luxury to other men…but you have not a foot of ground to call your own.” Wanted to limit the Wanted to rebuild the The patricians were not Tiberius Gracchus and amount of land each farming class by pleased with Tiberius hundreds of his followers person could own redistributing land Gracchus were murdered Gaius Gracchus and Reform Gaius was elected tribune in 122 BCE, about ten He also wanted land Gaius wanted even more years after his brother reform. than land reform. was murdered. Gaius wanted the Gaius proposed that Gaius wanted a public government to sell grain landless Romans be works program to employ to the poor at reduced settled in the provinces. the poor. prices. Gaius wanted to reform Riots erupted. In 121 the way that taxes were Gaius wanted to decrease BCE, he was killed along collected by publicans in the Senate’s power. with thousands of his the provinces. supporters. Differing Parties Continued to Argue Optimates Populares • Senatorial party • People’s party • Wanted to maintain • Had its strength in the position and the Comitia power of the (Assembly) wealthy patrician • Wanted reforms class Military Dictators Come to Power • Why did military dictators come to power? – Constant fighting in Rome between the rich and poor – Restlessness in the provinces – Slave rebellions (e.g., Spartacus) – Barbarian invasions (though not as serious as they became during the era of the Roman empire) – The people needed strong leadership Gaius Marius (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharsalus 48 BC So SI SHEPPARD Is a Former Journalist Currently Enrolled As a Ph.D
    Campaign OSPREY Pharsalus 48 BC so SI SHEPPARD is a former journalist currently enrolled as a Ph.D. student in International Relations at Johns Hopkins University. He graduated with an MA with Distinction from Victoria University and was winner of the Sir Desmond Todd Award for best thesis in a political subject. Si Sheppard has published a number of books and has contributed numerous articles on political and historical topics to leading journals, magazines and newspapers. This is his first title for Osprey. He lives in Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ADAM HOOK studied graphic design, and began his work as an illustrator in 1983. He specializes in detailed historical reconstructions, and has illustrated Osprey titles on the Aztecs, the Greeks, the American Civil War and the American Revolution. His work features in exhibitions and publications throughout the world. He lives in East Sussex, UK. Pharsalus 48 BC Caesar and Pompey - Clash of the Titans Campaign • 174 Pharsalus 48 BC Caesar and Pompey - Clash of the Titans Si Sheppard • Illustrated by Adam Hook ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Dedicated to Stephen Levine: mentor, colleague and friend. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 7 CHRONOLOGY 17 OPPOSING COMMANDERS 21 The Caesareans • The Republicans THE LEGIONS OF THE LATE REPUBLIC 29 THE CAMPAIGN 33 The Rubicon to Brundisium • Brundisium to Dyrrachium • Dyrrachium to Pharsalus THE BATTLE 54 Opposing plans • Opposing armies • The clash of arms AFTERMATH 83 THE BATTLEFIELD TODAY 92 BIBLIOGRAPHY 93 INDEX 95 INTRODUCTION: TO THE RUBICON he legend SPQR - Senatus Populusque Romanus, the Senate and People of Rome - emblazoned on the standards of the city's all- conquering legions in the last few centuries before Christ was both a potent symbol of the source of the republic's power and a reflection of the smouldering tension inherent in its system of government.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Simulation of Julius Caesar's Battlefield Speeches
    acoustics Article Acoustic Simulation of Julius Caesar’s Battlefield Speeches Braxton Boren Audio Technology Program, Department of Performing Arts, College of Arts & Sciences, American University, Washington, DC 20016, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-202-885-1482 Received: 14 September 2018; Accepted: 10 October 2018; Published: 14 October 2018 Abstract: History contains many accounts of speeches given by civic and military leaders before large crowds prior to the invention of electronic amplification. Historians have debated the historical accuracy of these accounts, often making some reference to acoustics, either supporting or refuting the accounts, but without any numerical justification. The field of digital humanities, and more specifically archaeoacoustics, seeks to use computational techniques to provide empirical data to improve historical analysis. Julius Caesar recalled giving speeches to 14,000 men after the battle of Dyrrachium and another to 22,000 men before the battle of Pharsalus during the Roman Civil War. Caesar’s background and education are discussed, including his training in rhetoric and oratory, which would have affected his articulation and effective sound pressure level while addressing his troops. Based on subjective reports about Caesar’s oratorical abilities, his effective Sound Pressure Level (SPL) is assumed to be 80 dBA, about 6 dB above the average loud speaking voice but lower than that of the loudest trained actors and singers. Simulations show that for reasonable background noise conditions Caesar could have been heard intelligibly by 14,000 soldiers in a quiet, controlled environment as in the speech at Dyrrachium. In contrast, even granting generous acoustic and geometric conditions, Caesar could not have been heard by more than about 700 soldiers while his army was on the march before the battle of Pharsalus.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesar's Legion: the Epic Saga of Julius Caesar's Elite Tenth Legion
    CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. flast.qxd 12/5/01 4:49 PM Page xiv ffirs.qxd 12/5/01 4:47 PM Page i CAESAR’S LEGION : THE EPIC SAGA OF JULIUS CAESAR’S ELITE TENTH LEGION AND THE ARMIES OF ROME STEPHEN DANDO-COLLINS John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright © 2002 by Stephen Dando-Collins. All rights reserved Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authoriza- tion through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4744. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158-0012, (212) 850-6011, fax (212) 850-6008, email: [email protected]. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought. This title is also available in print as ISBN 0-471-09570-2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Contest for Macedon
    The Contest for Macedon: A Study on the Conflict Between Cassander and Polyperchon (319 – 308 B.C.). Evan Pitt B.A. (Hons. I). Grad. Dip. This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Humanities University of Tasmania October 2016 Declaration of Originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does this thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Evan Pitt 27/10/2016 Authority of Access This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Evan Pitt 27/10/2016 ii Acknowledgements A doctoral dissertation is never completed alone, and I am forever grateful to my supervisor, mentor and friend, Dr Graeme Miles, who has unfailingly encouraged and supported me over the many years. I am also thankful to all members of staff at the University of Tasmania; especially to the members of the Classics Department, Dr Jonathan Wallis for putting up with my constant stream of questions with kindness and good grace and Dr Jayne Knight for her encouragement and support during the final stages of my candidature. The concept of this thesis was from my honours project in 2011. Dr Lara O’Sullivan from the University of Western Australia identified the potential for further academic investigation in this area; I sincerely thank her for the helpful comments and hope this work goes some way to fulfil the potential she saw.
    [Show full text]