References and Index

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

References and Index References Aissen, Judith and David Perlmutter 1976 Clause reduction in Spanish. In: Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whis- tler, Vicki Edge, Jeri Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall and Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds.), Proceed- ings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Soci- ety (BLS 2), 1-30. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society. 1983 Clause reduction in Spanish. In: David Perlmutter (ed.) Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 360-403. Chicago: The University of Chi- cago Press. Akmajian, Adrian, Susan Steele and Tomas Wasow 1979 The category AUX in Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 1-64. Alsina, Alex 1992 On the argument structure of causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 517-555. Baker, Mark 1988 Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function Changing. Chi- cago: The University of Chicago Press. Barbiers, Sjef 1995 The syntax of interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Lei- den, The Netherlands. [Distributed by: Holland Academic Graphics (HIL), The Hague.] Bayer, Josef and Jacqueline Kornfilt 1990 Restructuring effects in German. In: Elisabet Engdahl, Mike Reape, Martin Mellor and Richard Cooper (eds.), Parametric variation in Germanic and Romance: Center of Cognitive Science Working Pa- pers, 21-42. Edinburgh: ICCS, University of Edinburgh. Bech, Gunnar 1955 Studien zum deutschen Verbum infinitum. Tübingen: Max Nie- meyer Verlag. Belletti, Adriana 1990 Generalized verb movement: Aspects of verb syntax. Turin: Rosen- berg & Sellier. Bennis, Hans and Teun Hoekstra 1989 Why Kaatje was not heard sing a song. In: Dany Jaspers, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys and Pieter Seuren (eds.), Sentential com- plementation and the lexicon: Studies in honour of Wim de Geest, 21-40. Dordrecht: Foris. References 347 Besten, Hans den and Jean Rutten 1989 On verb raising, extraposition and free word order in Dutch. In: Dany Jaspers, Wim Klooster, Yvan Putseys and Pieter Seuren (eds.), Sentential complementation and the lexicon: Studies in hon- our of Wim de Geest, 41-56. Dordrecht: Foris. Bhatt, Rajesh 1998 Obligation and possession. In: Heidi Harley (ed.), Papers from the UPenn/MIT roundtable on argument structure and aspect: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 21-40. Bobaljik, Jonathan David 1995 Morphosyntax: The syntax of verbal inflection. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cambridge, Mass.] 1998 Floating quantifiers: Handle with care. Glot International 3: 3-10. Bobaljik, Jonathan David and Höskuldur Thráinsson 1998 Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37-71. Bobaljik, Jonathan and Susi Wurmbrand 1999 Modals, raising & A-reconstruction. Talk given at Leiden Univer- sity, The Netherlands, and University of Salzburg, Austria [http://web.mit.edu/susi/www/Leiden.pdf]. 2001 Reconstruction and A-traces: A reply to Lasnik (1999). Ms. Mon- tréal, Québec: McGill University. Boivin, Marie Claude 1998 Complementation and interpretation: The concrete and imaginative readings of visual perception verbs. In: Uli Sauerland and Orin Percus (eds.), The interpretive tract: MIT Working Papers in Lin- guistics 25: 103-123. Bok-Bennema, Reineke and Brigitte Kampers-Manhe 1994 Transparency effects in the Romance languages. In: Michael Maz- zola (ed.) Issues and theory in Romance linguistics: Selected pa- pers from the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages XXIII, 199-217. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Borer, Hagit 1989 Anaphoric AGR. In: Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter, 69-109. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub- lishers. ¡ Bos kovic, Zeljko 1995 Principles of economy in nonfinite complementation. Ph.D. Dis- sertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. [Published as ¡ Bos kovic 1997.] 1996 Selection and the categorial status of Infinitival Complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 14: 269-304. 1997 The syntax of nonfinite complementation: An economy approach. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 348 References Bouchard, Denis 1984 On the content of empty categories. Dordrecht: Foris. Brennan, Virginia 1993 Root and epistemic modal auxiliary verbs in English. Ph.D. Dis- sertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Distributed by: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Amherst, Mass.] Bresnan, Joan 1971 Sentence stress and transformations. Language 47: 257-297. 1982 Control and complementation. In: Joan Bresnan (ed.) The mental representation of grammatical relations, 282-390. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Brody, Michael 1995 Lexico-logical form: A radically minimalist theory. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Broekhuis, Hans 1992 Chain-government: Issues in Dutch syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [Distributed by: Hol- land Academic Graphics (HIL), The Hague.] Broekhuis, Hans, Hans den Besten, Kees Hoekstra and Jean Rutten 1995 Infinitival complementation in Dutch: On remnant extraposition. The Linguistic Review 12: 93-122. Browning, Marguerite 1987 Null operator constructions. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, Mass. [Distributed by: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Cam- bridge, Mass.] Burzio, Luigi 1986 Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. Cattell, R. 1978 On the source of interrogative adverbs. Language 54: 61-77. Chierchia, Gennaro 1983 Outline of a semantic theory of (obligatory) control. In: Michael Barlow, David P. Flickinger and Michael T. Westcoat (eds.), Pro- ceedings of the 2nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 2), 19-31. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Associa- tion. 1984 Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds. In: Mark Cobler, Susannah MacKaye and Michael T. Wescoat (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 3), 28-39. Stanford, CA: Stanford Linguistics Association. 1984b Topics in the syntax and semantics of infinitives and gerunds. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [Dis- tributed by: Graduate Linguistic Student Association, Amherst, Mass.] References 349 1989 Anaphora and attitudes de se. In: Renate Bartsch, J. van Benthem and P. van Emde Boas (eds.), Semantics and contextual expression, 1-32. Dordrecht: Foris. Chomsky, Noam 1957 Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. 1980 On binding. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1-46. 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. 1982 Some concepts and consequences of the theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1986a Barriers. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1986b Knowledge of language. New York: Praeger. 1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Chomsky, Noam and Howard Lasnik 1993 Principles and parameters theory. In: Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld and Theo Vennemann (eds.), Syn- tax: An international handbook of contemporary research, 506- 569. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 1995 Principles and parameters theory. In: Noam Chomsky (ed.) The Minimalist Program, 13-127. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Cinque, Guglielmo 1990a Two classes of intransitive adjectives in Italian. In: Günther Gre- wendorf and Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and barriers, 261-349. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1990b Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. 1997a The interaction of passive, causative, and ‘restructuring’ in Ro- mance. Ms. Venice: University of Venice. 1997b Restructuring and the order of aspectual and root modal heads. Ms. Venice: University of Venice. 1998 On clitic climbing and other transparency effects. Talk given at MIT, Cambridge, Mass. 1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Ox- ford, UK: Oxford University Press. 2000 “Restructuring” and functional structure. Ms. Venice: University of Venice. Comrie, Bernard 1984 Subject and object control: Syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Ber- keley Linguistic Society, 450-464. Cremers, C. 1983 On two types of infinitival complementation. In: Frank Heny and Barry Richards (eds.), Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and re- lated puzzles, 169-221.1.) Dordrecht: Reidel. Declerck, Renaat 1981 On the role of progressive aspect in nonfinite perception verb com- plements. Glossa 15: 83-114. 350 References 1982 The triple origin of participial perception verb complements. Lin- guistic Analysis 10: 1-26. 1983 On the passive of infinitival perception verb complements. Journal of English Linguistics 16: Dikken, Marcel den 1996 The minimal links of verb (projection) raising. In: Werner Abra- ham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson and Jan- Wouter C. Zwart (eds.), Minimal ideas: Syntactic studies in the minimalist framework, 67-96. (Linguistik Aktuell 12.) Amster- dam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DiSciullo, Anna Maria and Edwin Williams 1987 On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Erb, Marie Christine 2001 Finite auxiliaries in German. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Til- burg, The Netherlands. Evers, Arnold 1975a The Guillotine principle. In: A. Kraak (ed.) Linguistics in the Neth- erlands 1972-1973, 147. Amsterdam: Von Gorcu. 1975b The transformational cycle of Dutch and German. Ph.D. Disserta- tion, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands. 1986 Clause union in French and German. Groninger Arbeiten zur ger- manistischen Linguistik 28: 170-201. 1988 Non-finite verb forms and subject theta assignment. In: Martin Ev- eraert, Arnold Evers, Riny Huybregts and Mieke Trommelen (eds.), Morphology and modularity: In honour of Henk Schultink, 105-128. Dordrecht: Foris. 1990 The infinitival prefix “zu” as INFL. In: Günther Grewendorf and Wolfgang
Recommended publications
  • Towards an Account of the Present Paradigm Conflict in the Development of Linguistics*
    Towards an Account of the Present Paradigm Conflict in the Development of Linguistics* By Taki Bremmers 3853500 BA Thesis English Language and Culture, Utrecht University Supervisor: Koen Sebregts Second Reader: Rick Nouwen November 2014 ____________________________ * I would like to thank my supervisor, Koen Sebregts, for motivating me and for carefully evaluating my work, as well as my friends and family, for supporting me. BA Thesis Taki Bremmers, November 2014 2 Abstract This thesis provides an account of the present linguistic paradigm conflict and its implications for the development of linguistics. In the light of Kuhn’s and Laudan’s respective theories of scientific progress, this thesis reflects upon the recent past, the present and the future of the linguistic field. The application of Kuhn’s theory to the current state of affairs in linguistics as described by Scholz, Pelletier, and Pullum suggests that the linguistic field is constituted upon three paradigms: Essentialism, Emergentism, and Externalism. These conflicting paradigms can be traced back to distinctive scientific traditions associated with Chosmky, Sapir, and Bloomfield, respectively. From the base of these past developments and the present situation, the future possibilities of linguistics can be inventoried: (1) linguistics may remain a pre- scientific discipline, (2) the linguistic paradigm conflict may persist, (3) the respective paradigms may be reconciled, or (4) a scientific revolution may take place. None of these scenarios can be precluded on the grounds of philosophical reflection. In reference to Kuhn’s and Laudan’s respective theories, it can, however, be argued that the linguistic field might be moved forward by promoting and evaluating debates between adherents of different paradigms.
    [Show full text]
  • Unconscious Elements in Linguistic Communication: Language and Social Reality
    EJPC 6 (2) pp. 185–194 Intellect Limited 2015 Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication Volume 6 Number 2 © 2015 Intellect Ltd Article. English language. doi: 10.1386/ejpc.6.2.185_1 Pieter A. M. seuren Max Planck Institute of Psycholinguistics unconscious elements in linguistic communication: Language and social reality AbstrAct Keywords The message of the present article is, first, that, besides and below the strictly accommodation linguistic aspects of communication through language, of which speakers are in prin- consciousness ciple fully aware, a great deal of knowledge not carried in virtue of the system of the divergence language in question but rather transmitted by the form of the intended message, frequency is imparted to listeners or readers, without either being in the least aware of this group identity happening. For example, listeners quickly register the social status, regional origin or social reality emotional attitude of speakers and they react to those kinds of ‘paralinguistic’ infor- mation, mostly totally unawares. When speaker and listener have a positive atti- tude with regard to each other, the reaction consists, among other things, in mutual alignment or accommodation of pronunciation features, lexical selections and style of speaking. When the mutual attitude is negative, the opposite happens: speak- ers accentuate their differences. Then, when this happens not between individual interlocutors but between groups of speakers, such accommodation or divergence phenomena may lead to language change. The main theoretical question raised, but not answered, in this article is how and at what point forms of behaviour, includ- ing linguistic behaviour, achieve the status of being ‘standard’ or ‘accepted’ in any given community and what it means to say that they are ‘standard’ or ‘accepted’.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Synthese (2011) 179:203–206 DOI 10.1007/s11229-010-9774-7 Introduction Johan van Benthem · Theo Kuipers · Henk Visser Received: 10 January 2010 / Accepted: 10 January 2010 / Published online: 31 August 2010 © The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Evert Willem Beth (Almelo, July 7, 1908—Amsterdam, April 12, 1964) was the main founder of logic and formal philosophy in The Netherlands. His remarkable research career produced ground-breaking insights in the foundations of mathematics and philosophy, and his teaching inspired a generation of gifted students. Moreover, Beth’s organizational talents were instrumental in creating the Amsterdam Institute for Logic and Foundations of the Exact Sciences, the first true philosophy depart- ment in The Netherlands, and the international Division of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science. This issue of Synthese pays tribute to the lasting influence of this remarkable person. J. van Benthem Amsterdam, The Netherlands T. Kuipers (B) Groningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] H. Visser Maastricht, The Netherlands 123 204 Synthese (2011) 179:203–206 Beth was trained as a philosopher, mathematician and physicist. His doctoral dis- sertation in 1935 was on the philosophy of mathematics, and he quickly became a prominent protagonist of the international scientific philosophy of the age, with math- ematical logic as its strong arm. Soon a prolific philosophical period started, resulting in original insights into the nature of scientific philosophy, the philosophy of mathe- matics, and the semantics of physical theories. Beth’s main mathematical results were found in the 1950s, in his more advanced years (a beacon of hope to the middle- aged who have not been touched by creativity yet).
    [Show full text]
  • Null Theory of Creole Formation Based on Universal Grammar
    A Null Theory of Creole Formation Based on Universal Grammar Oxford Handbooks Online A Null Theory of Creole Formation Based on Universal Grammar Enoch Aboh and Michel deGraff The Oxford Handbook of Universal Grammar Edited by Ian Roberts Print Publication Date: Dec 2016 Subject: Linguistics, Language Contact, Language Acquisition Online Publication Date: Feb 2017 DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199573776.013.18 Abstract and Keywords Creole languages are typically the linguistic side effects of the creation of global economies based on the forced migration and labor of enslaved Africans toiling in European colonies in the Americas. Section 1 addresses terminological and methodological preliminaries in Creole studies, including definitions of ‘Creole’ languages that contradict some of the fundamental assumptions in studies of Universal Grammar (UG). Section 2 evaluates Creole-formation hypotheses, including claims about the lesser grammatical complexity of Creoles and about an exceptional ‘Creole typology’ outside the scope of the Comparative Method in historical linguistics. Section 3 offers the sketch of a framework for a Null Theory of Creole Formation (NTC) that excludes sui generis stipulations about Creole formation and Creole languages and that is rooted in UG, as it applies to all languages. Section 4 concludes the paper with open-ended questions on the place of Creole formation within larger patterns of contact-induced language change. Keywords: Creole languages, Comparative Method, complexity, typology, language acquisition, language change CREOLE languages in the Caribbean are among the outcomes of peculiar historical processes linking Europe, Africa, and the Americas: these languages are the linguistic side effects of global economies based on the forced migration and labor of enslaved Africans toiling in European colonies in the Americas.1 Because the postulated processes of ‘Creole formation’ are most controversial (perhaps even more so than Universal Grammar), section 17.1 addresses terminological and methodological preliminaries.
    [Show full text]
  • “Mi No Sal Tron Tongo” Early Sranan in Court Records 1667 - 1767
    “Mi no sal tron tongo” Early Sranan in court records 1667 - 1767 Margot van den Berg “Mi no sal tron tongo” Early Sranan in court records 1667-1767 “Mi no sal tron tongo” Early Sranan in court records 1667-1767 Master’s thesis - Linguistics University of Nijmegen Supervisors: Dr. J. Arends University of Amsterdam Dr. L. Stassen University of Nijmegen October 2000 Margot C. van den Berg Schoolstraat 155 6512 JG Nijmegen The Netherlands [email protected] - Qu’est-ce que vous allez chercher là-bas? - J’attends d’être là-bas pour le savoir. André Gide Voyage au Congo (1927) Table of contents Acknowledgements.......................................................................................... 3 Abbrevations..................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................. 5 1.1 Contemporary Sranan .......................................................................................................5 1.2 The formation of Sranan....................................................................................................5 1.3 Superstrate (or lexifier) language.....................................................................................7 1.4 Substrate influence............................................................................................................8 1.5 Grammaticalization ............................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Ed. by Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1986, 315 Pages, Hfl
    REVIEWS Substrata Versus Universals in Creole Genesis (Creole Language Library, Vol. 1), ed. by Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1986, 315 pages, Hfl. 150, $76.05 CDN, $60.00 US, ISBN 9027252211/ 0- 915027-90-9. This first volume in the series Creole Language Library (general editor, Pieter Muysken) is a collection of fourteen papers resulting from a workshop held at the University of Amsterdam in April 1985. As the title indicates, sides are taken and defended, and the editors, Pieter Muysken and Norval Smith, act as moderators. The main topic is syntax, but there is one paper on semantics. Phonology is conspicuously absent. The debate - a heated one - centers on a theoretical issue which has sparked more controversy than any other in recent creole language research. It has gained momentum especially since the publication of Derek Bickerton's 'language bioprogram hypothesis' in the debating forum of The Behavioral and Brain Sciences (1984). Bickerton hypothesizes that creole languages are largely 'invented' by children and show fundamental similarities, which derive from a biological program for language. An enormous range of disciplines and theories are involved: child language, second language acquisition, universal grammar, government-binding theory, psycho­ linguistics, neuro-science, genetics, and on goes the list. In the introductory chapter, the editors summarize the issues and critically evaluate each contribution. They present the argument as follows (p. 1): The universalist hypothesis claims, essentially, that the particular grammatical properties of creole languages directly reflect universal aspects of the human language capacity ... The substrate hypothesis claims, on the other hand, that creole genesis results from the confrontation of two systems, the native languages of the colonized groups, and the dominant colonial language, and that the native language leaves strong traces in the resulting creole.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle in the Mind Fields: Class 1
    Battle in the Mind Fields: Class 1 John A Goldsmith June 21, 2019 Topic 1: The graphic genealogy and visual index 1. People, groups, influences, continuity (rupture? not so much) 2. Top to bottom: time. People at the top were born later than people at the bottom 3. Left to right: linguistics, philosophy, psychology. 4. Vienna Circle, Prague Circle, Gestalt psychology . Topic 2: The syllabus 1. What this course is all about: what you need to know to understand how we got here 2. The origins of modern linguistics 3. Philosophy and psychology. Auguste Comte, Ernst Mach, Wilhelm Wundt, Franz Brentano 4. Edward Sapir, Leonard Bloomfield; psychology in the United States 5. Roman Jakobson, Nicolas Trubetzkoy; Edmund Husserl 6. The Vienna Circle, the unity of science; cybernetics 7. American descriptivism: it was not what you think 8. Generative grammar: phonology, syntax, and the goals of the general theory Proposal 1: Reappropriating our history 1. Disciplines, barriers and moles 2. The eternal conversation 3. Some of our neighbors: philosophy, logic, and psychology 1 You do not understand the answer until you understand the question to which it was the answer. 1 Why did modern linguistics emerge in the 19th century? Topic 3: Six generations of linguists 1. Generation 1: Humboldt, Grimm, Rask, Bopp 2. Generation 2: Grassmann, Schleicher, Müller, William Dwight Whitney 3. Generation 3: Neogrammarians, Baudouin de Courtenay, Saussure 4. Generation 4: Trubetzkoy, Jakobson, Sapir, Bloomfield 5. Generation 5: Charles Hockett, Zellig Harris 6. Generation 6: Noam Chomsky, Morris Halle 1 Topic 4: Why is it so hard to read linguistics from the past? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Syntactic Developments in Sranan
    Syntactic Developments in Sranan Creolization as a Gradual Process Jacques Arends bron Jacques Arends, Syntactic Developments in Sranan. Z.p., z.j. [1989] Zie voor verantwoording: http://www.dbnl.org/tekst/aren012synt01_01/colofon.htm © 2009 dbnl / erven Jacques Arends VII In memory of my parents For Melanie, Jasper, Michiel and Tommie Jacques Arends, Syntactic Developments in Sranan IX Preface This study is the result of a research project entitled ‘Syntactic change in Sranan’, which was initiated by my supervisor, Professor Pieter Seuren, and by the late Professor Jan Voorhoeve, the founder of Sranan studies in the Netherlands. The project was financed under number W 39-81 by the Dutch Organization for the Advancement of Tropical Research (WOTRO), which assistance is here gratefully acknowledged. I feel I have been lucky to be able to work on a research project that turned out to be so rewarding in so many ways. There are several people and institutions who I would like to thank for helping me during the preparation of this thesis: Lilian Adamson and George Bakboord for teaching me Sranan; Hein Eersel for sharing with me his vast knowledge of early Sranan and for checking my interpretation of all the sample sentences contained in Part 2; Bart Geurts for providing computer assistance in the analysis of some of the data; Geert Koefoed and Herman Wekker for their encouragement and commitment; Renata de Bies, Glenn Gilbert, John Holm, Robby Morroy, Pieter Muysken, Leon Stassen and Harry Wetzer for many helpful comments on some of the papers which formed the basis for this thesis; Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Name: SEUREN, Pieter Albertus Maria Address: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, PO Box 310 6500 AH Nijmegen (Netherlands) email: [email protected] Date of birth: Haarlem, Netherlands, 9 July 1934 Nationality: Dutch Degrees: 1956: BA Latin, Greek and Ancient History, Amsterdam University (cum laude) 1958: MA Linguistics, Latin and Greek, Amsterdam University (cum laude) 1969: Ph.D. Utrecht University (cum laude) (Dissertation: Operators and Nucleus) Appointments: 1955–1960: Assistant Linguistics, Amsterdam University 1959–1963: Teacher Classical Languages, Amsterdam 1962–1964: Member Euratom Group Machine Translation, Amsterdam Univ. 1964–1966: Assistant Linguistics, Groningen University 1966–1967: Research Assistant Dutch Ministry of Education 1967–1971: Lecturer Linguistics, Cambridge University (Darwin College) 1971–1974: Lecturer Linguistics, Oxford University (Magdalen College) 1974–1995: Professor Philosophy of Language, Radboud University Nijmegen 1995–1999: Professor Theoretical Linguistics, Radboud University Nijmegen 1999–now: Research Fellow Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Distinctions: Honorary Medal Université Libre de Bruxelles (1978) Honorary Member Arts Faculty, Edinburgh University (1979) Member Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences (1988) D.Litt. hon. causa, Glasgow University (1996) Honorary Member Linguistic Society of America (2008) Visiting Professorships: July–October 1970/1/2/3: Sydney University, Philosophy Dept. October 1972: Amsterdam University, French Dept. June 1973: Zurich University, English Dept. June/July, Sept./Oct. 1988: Glasgow University, Psychology Dept. May 1989: Oxford University, Linguistics Dept. Oct./Nov./Dec. 1989: Visiting Fellow All Souls College, Oxford 1992–1997: six visiting professorships at Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, Dept. of Computational Linguistics 2 Jan.-Febr. 1996: University of Berne, Dept. of English October 1997: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, Mannheim November 1997: Universidade de Alagoas, Maceiò, Brasil, Linguistics Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Concerning the Roots of Transformational Generative Grammar*
    Review article / Rapport critique Forschungsbericht Concerning the Roots of Transformational Generative Grammar* Pieter Seuren Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen 1. Introductory remarks Transformational generative grammar (henceforth: TGG) as it has been known for decades now, has without a doubt found a permanent place in the his- tory of linguistics. Despite the sometimes tortuous and not always transparent ways along which it has manifested itself over the past sixty years and the many dead alleys it got caught in, it seems most unlikely that it will disappear without a trace in the future developments of linguistic theory and practice. It is, therefore, most appropriate that ample attention should be paid to the origins of TGG as a phenomenon in 20th-century scientific thought. In this context, the recent book by Marcus Tomalin (Tomalin 2006) on the origins of Transformational Generative Grammar should kindle the interest of a wide public. Tomalin’s book Linguistics and the Formal Sciences (henceforth LFS) probes the intellectual origins and backgrounds of TGG as it appeared on the market during the late 1950s. This is an ambitious enterprise, given the enormously com- plex fabric of developments in philosophy (in particular ontology, epistemology and the philosophy of science), psychology, (structuralist) linguistics, logic and cid-58008116/1 IP: 154.59.124.115 On: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:48:27 mathematics and their foundations during the first half of the twentieth century, and the roots of all these stormy developments in earlier centuries. In fact, the intellectual climate in which first structuralist linguistics and then its formalist successors, both in Europe and in North America, came about shows a richness, a dynamism and an intellectual power that are hard to fathom in our day.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking
    The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking Een wetenschappelijke proeve op het gebied van de Letteren Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, volgens besluit van het College van Decanen in het openbaar te verdedigen op maandag 29 januari 2001, des namiddags om 1.30 uur precies door Michael Alexander Cysouw geboren op 18 juni 1970 te Nijmegen Promotor: Prof. Dr. P.A.M. Seuren Co-promotor: Dr. L. Stassen Manuscriptcommissie: Prof. Dr. H. Steinhauer (voorzitter) Prof. Dr. E. König (Freie Universität Berlin) Prof. Dr. G.G. Corbett (University of Surrey, Guildford) Contents Long Contents VII Acknowledgments XIII List of Abbreviations and Symbols XV 1. Introduction 1 Part One: Person Marking 2. One among the crowd 35 3. Group marking 63 Part Two: Paradigmatic Structure 4. The diversity of the core 99 5. Paradigmatic explicitness 163 6. Connecting paradigms 197 Part Three: Number Incorporated 7. Cardinality 223 8. The diversity of minimal number 241 9. Cognate paradigms revisited 281 10. Finale 311 Appendices A. Compound pronouns 325 B. Survey of person paradigms 341 C. Survey of number marking 345 References 347 Samenvatting 371 Curriculum vitae 381 Long Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS XIII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS XV CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................. 1 Objective, definitions, method and some history 1.1 THE FEAT OF DOMINGO DE SANTO TOMÁS 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS AND DELIMITATION 4
    [Show full text]
  • Section Editors
    SECTION EDITORS Animal Communication – Marc Naguib, University of Bielefeld, Germany Marc Naguib is Associate Professor at the University of Bielefeld, Germany. He received his Ph.D. in 1995 at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. His research addresses mechanistic and functional questions in animal communication, focusing on vocal communication in song birds, with interests ranging from song development to the evolution of signal structures and signaling strategies. He has published numerous research articles on auditory distance perception of song birds under natural field conditions, categorization of signals, and strategies of vocal interactions in dyadic interactions and communication networks. He is Associate Editor for Advances in the Study of Behaviour and on the Editorial Board of Animal Behaviour. Applied Linguistics – Margie Berns, Purdue University, USA Margie Berns is a Professor of English Language and Linguistics and Director of the Program in English as a Second Language at Purdue University (Indiana, USA). Her areas of specialization are English in the global context, language policy and planning, and second language studies. Among her publications on these and related topics are Contexts of Competence: Social and Cultural Considerations in Communicative Language Teaching (Plenum, 1990), Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching (Addison Wesley, 1984), and Initiatives in Communicative Language Teaching II (Addison Wesley, 1987). Articles and reviews have appeared in TESOL Quarterly, World Englishes, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, and English Today. A member of the International Association for World Englishes (IAWE), International TESOL, and the American Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL), she has served in such capacities as IAWE Conference and Program Chair, and AAAL President, Conference and Program Chair, and Member-at-Large.
    [Show full text]