DOCSLIB.ORG

I-405 Bus Rapid Transit SEPA Checklist

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) I-405 Bus Rapid Transit SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 Prepared for: Sound Transit 401 South Jackson Street Seattle, Washington 98104 Prepared by: WSP USA 999 Third Avenue, Suite 3200 Seattle, Washington 98104 and ESA 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW, Suite 200 Seattle, Washington 98107 Page i | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .........................................................................................V PROJECT OVERVIEW ...............................................................................................................VII A BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 1 B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS .................................................................................... 20 1. Earth .................................................................................................................... 20 2. Air ........................................................................................................................ 27 3. Water ................................................................................................................... 29 4. Plants .................................................................................................................. 42 5. Animals ................................................................................................................ 50 6. Energy and Natural Resources ........................................................................... 53 7. Environmental Health .......................................................................................... 53 8. Land and Shoreline Use ...................................................................................... 68 9. Housing ............................................................................................................... 81 10. Aesthetics ............................................................................................................ 81 11. Light and Glare .................................................................................................... 89 12. Recreation ........................................................................................................... 93 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation ....................................................................... 94 14. Transportation ................................................................................................... 103 15. Public Services .................................................................................................. 118 16. Utilities ............................................................................................................... 121 C SIGNATURE ................................................................................................................. 128 GLOSSARY OF TERMS .......................................................................................................... 135 Page ii | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Tables Table 1 I-405 BRT project components – Potential approvals and permits prior to construction ........................................................................................................... 6 Table 2 I-405 BRT project components: Address and Section/Township/Range ............. 19 Table 3 I-405 BRT project components: Slopes ............................................................... 20 Table 4 I-405 BRT project components: Types of soils .................................................... 21 Table 5 Nearest surface waters to project components ................................................... 30 Table 6 Wetland characteristics, rating, and applicable buffer distances in the Tukwila International Boulevard BRT Station and Roadway Improvements vicinity .................................................................................................................. 33 Table 7 Wetland characteristics, rating, and applicable buffer distances in the Brickyard Station and Roadway Improvements vicinity ....................................... 34 Table 8 Summary of new or reduced impervious surface area by project component ..... 40 Table 9 Stormwater management facilities summary ....................................................... 41 Table 10 Estimated vegetation and tree removal by project component ............................ 49 Table 11 Nearest federally listed and state protected species to project components ....... 51 Table 12 Current and adjacent land uses by project component ....................................... 69 Table 13 Current land ownership, long-term land use and temporary use of WSDOT right-of-way by project component ...................................................................... 70 Table 14 Existing structures on the South Renton Transit Center site ............................... 74 Table 15 Comprehensive Plan designation for each project component ........................... 77 Table 16 Proposed structure heights and building materials .............................................. 82 Table 17 Recorded place names within the vicinity of the South Renton Transit Center and Roadway Improvements project component ................................................ 98 Table 18 Recorded place names within the vicinity of the Bellevue Transit Center and Off-site Layover project component..................................................................... 99 Table 19 Recorded place names within the vicinity of the Totem Lake/Kingsgate Station and Kingsgate Park-and-Ride Garage project component .................... 100 Table 20 Recorded place names within the Brickyard Station and Roadway Improvements project component ..................................................................... 101 Page iii | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Attachments Attachment A Figures Attachment B I-405 BRT Project Conceptual Engineering Plans – Excerpted Design Sheets Attachment C I-405 BRT Corridor Ecosystem Resources and Wetland Delineation Technical Memorandum Attachment D I-405 BRT Corridor Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandum Attachment E I-405 BRT Corridor Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum Attachment F I-405 BRT Corridor Visual and Aesthetic Resources Technical Memorandum Attachment G I-405 BRT Corridor Historic and Archaeological Resources Technical Memorandum Attachment H I-405 BRT Corridor Transportation Technical Report Page iv | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ASL air space lease BAT business access and transit BMP best management practice BRT bus rapid transit BTEX benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes CPTED crime prevention through environmental design DAHP Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation dBA A-weighted decibel DCE Documented Categorical Exclusion Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology EDNA Environmental Designations for Noise Abatement ESA environmental site assessment ESO Environmental Services Office ETL express toll lane FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration GHG greenhouse gas HGM hydrogeomorphic hp horsepower KCWD King County Water District LOS level-of-service LUST leaking underground storage tanks MP mile post MSAT Mobile Source Air Toxics MTCA Model Toxics Control Act NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act NRHP National Register of Historic Places PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PCB polychlorinated biphenyls PHS Priority Habitat and Species ppm parts per million Project I-405 Bus Rapid Transit Project PSCAA Puget Sound Clean Air Agency PSE Puget Sound Energy SCL Seattle City Light SEPA State Environmental Policy Act SR State Route TCAL temporary construction air space lease TIBS Tukwila International Boulevard light rail station TMC Tukwila Municipal Code TOD transit-oriented development TSP transit signal priority TVM ticket vending machine VMT vehicle miles traveled WAC Washington Administrative Code Page v | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) WDFW Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife WRIA Water Resource Inventory Area WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation Page vi | AE 0054-17 | SEPA Environmental Checklist September 2020 I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) PROJECT OVERVIEW Sound Transit proposes to implement the I-405 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Project, providing BRT service for 37 miles between Lynnwood and Burien, along portions of I-5, I-405, State Route (SR) 518, and some local arterial streets. The proposed I-405 BRT project addressed in this SEPA Checklist includes construction and operation of the following components (Figure A-1): • Burien Transit Center BRT station and roadway improvements • New Tukwila International Boulevard BRT station and roadway improvements • New South Renton Transit Center and roadway improvements • Bellevue Transit Center BRT station and off-site layover • New Totem Lake/Kingsgate BRT station and new Kingsgate Park-and-Ride garage • New Brickyard BRT station and roadway improvements • Lynnwood City Center BRT station and roadway improvements A variety of bicycle and pedestrian
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 2: Trends and Conditions

    Chapter 2: Trends and Conditions

    Chapter 2: Trends and Conditions Introduction Policies, demographics, economic conditions, land use, environmental factors, and travel patterns all change continuously, and each has an influence on which strategies will be effective in providing travelers in Redmond with safe, reliable travel choices. This chapter examines the changes that have influenced this update of the TMP, reports on the current state of the City of Redmond and, where possible, forecasts the conditions that will affect our transportation system in the future. Policy Developments Key Trends In 2011 Mayor John Marchione unveiled his vision for the City of Redmond: “Redmond is a city with two vibrant urban centers — Downtown and Overlake — and connected neighborhoods, providing high quality, responsive services to an engaged citizenry.” Since adoption of the first Transportation Master Plan in 2005, policy actions by the City and regional agencies have refined and reinforced Redmond’s urban center strategy, as well as its goal of increasing the diversity and sustainability of the transportation system. City Vision The vision is intended to influence all City work, from the biennial budget process to Comprehensive Plan updates, and was a guiding force for the Development of multi‑story, TMP. The TMP responds to the community vision through its urban centers mixed land uses with strategy, its attention to neighborhood connections, and its investments to improve mobility citywide for all users. The vision also influenced the residential spaces above development process of the TMP, which included a robust public outreach and engagement component. The comments and opinions voiced by commercial spaces will participants were key to establishing the direction of the plan, which is a spur the local market refinement of the direction established in the 2005 TMP.
  • Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study

    Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study

    Central Link Initial Segment and Airport Link Before & After Study Final Report February 2014 (this page left blank intentionally) Initial Segment and Airport Link Before and After Study – Final Report (Feb 2014) Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 Before and After Study Requirement and Purposes ................................................................................................... 1 Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Milestones .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Data Collection in the Fall .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Organization of the Report ........................................................................................................................................ 2 History of Project Planning and Development ....................................................................................................... 2 Characteristic 1 - Project Scope .............................................................................................................................. 6 Characteristic
  • Annual Report 1998 Sammamish River Sockeye Salmon Fry

    Annual Report 1998 Sammamish River Sockeye Salmon Fry

    Annual Report 1998 Sammamish River Sockeye Salmon Fry Production Evaluation Dave Seiler Lori Kishimoto Laurie Peterson Greg Volkhardt Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Olympia, Washington 98504-1091 December 2001 Funded by: Lake Washington/Cedar River Forum Table of Contents List of Tables................................................................ ii List of Figures ............................................................... iii Acknowledgments ............................................................ iv Executive Summary............................................................v 1998 Sammamish River Sockeye Salmon Fry Production Evaluation .....................1 Introduction ............................................................1 Goals and Objectives.....................................................2 Methods ...............................................................2 Trapping Gear and Operation ........................................3 Trap Calibration...................................................3 Fry Estimation ....................................................4 Results...............................................................11 Catch ..........................................................11 Efficiency and Flow...............................................11 Effect of Release Location..........................................12 Migration Estimate: Average vs. Predicted Efficiency ....................13 Fry Production ...................................................13 Migration timing
  • Sammamish River Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load Study Design

    Sammamish River Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load Study Design

    Quality Assurance Project Plan Sammamish River Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load Study Design October 2015 Publication No. 15-03-123 Publication Information Each study conducted by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) must have an approved Quality Assurance Project Plan. The plan describes the objectives of the study and the procedures to be followed to achieve those objectives. After completing the study, Ecology will post the final report of the study to the Internet. This Quality Assurance Project Plan is available on Ecology’s website at https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/SummaryPages/1503123.html Data for this project will be available on Ecology’s Environmental Information Management (EIM) website at www.ecy.wa.gov/eim/index.htm. Search Study ID MROS0001. Ecology’s Activity Tracker Code for this study is 15-035. Federal Clean Water Act 1996 303(d) Listings Addressed in this Study. See “Study area” and “Impairments addressed by this TMDL” sections. Author and Contact Information Teizeen Mohamedali P.O. Box 47600 Environmental Assessment Program Washington State Department of Ecology Olympia, WA 98504-7710 Communications Consultant: phone 360-407-6834. Washington State Department of Ecology - www.ecy.wa.gov o Headquarters, Lacey 360-407-6000 o Northwest Regional Office, Bellevue 425-649-7000 o Southwest Regional Office, Lacey 360-407-6300 o Central Regional Office, Union Gap 509-575-2490 o Eastern Regional Office, Spokane 509-329-3400 Cover photo: The Sammamish River, north of Redmond looking upstream (south) from the NE 116th St. Bridge. Photo taken by Ralph Svrjcek in July 2014.
  • United-2016-2021.Pdf

    United-2016-2021.Pdf

    27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.pdf 1 4/5/17 7:41 AM 2016 – 2021 Flight Attendant Agreement Association of Flight Attendants – CWA 27010_Contract_JCBA-FA_v10-cover.indd170326_L01_CRV.indd 1 1 3/31/174/5/17 7:533:59 AMPM TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 Recognition, Successorship and Mergers . 1 Section 2 Definitions . 4 Section 3 General . 10 Section 4 Compensation . 28 Section 5 Expenses, Transportation and Lodging . 36 Section 6 Minimum Pay and Credit, Hours of Service, and Contractual Legalities . 42 Section 7 Scheduling . 56 Section 8 Reserve Scheduling Procedures . 88 Section 9 Special Qualification Flight Attendants . 107 Section 10 AMC Operation . .116 Section 11 Training & General Meetings . 120 Section 12 Vacations . 125 Section 13 Sick Leave . 136 Section 14 Seniority . 143 Section 15 Leaves of Absence . 146 Section 16 Job Share and Partnership Flying Programs . 158 Section 17 Filling of Vacancies . 164 Section 18 Reduction in Personnel . .171 Section 19 Safety, Health and Security . .176 Section 20 Medical Examinations . 180 Section 21 Alcohol and Drug Testing . 183 Section 22 Personnel Files . 190 Section 23 Investigations & Grievances . 193 Section 24 System Board of Adjustment . 206 Section 25 Uniforms . 211 Section 26 Moving Expenses . 215 Section 27 Missing, Interned, Hostage or Prisoner of War . 217 Section 28 Commuter Program . 219 Section 29 Benefits . 223 Section 30 Union Activities . 265 Section 31 Union Security and Check-Off . 273 Section 32 Duration . 278 i LETTERS OF AGREEMENT LOA 1 20 Year Passes . 280 LOA 2 767 Crew Rest . 283 LOA 3 787 – 777 Aircraft Exchange . 285 LOA 4 AFA PAC Letter . 287 LOA 5 AFA Staff Travel .
  • Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service

    Volume I Restoration of Historic Streetcar Service

    VOLUME I ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESTORATION OF HISTORIC STREETCAR SERVICE IN DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES J U LY 2 0 1 8 City of Los Angeles Department of Public Works, Bureau of Engineering Table of Contents Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.3 Background ............................................................................................................................................................ ES-2 ES.4 7th Street Alignment Alternative ................................................................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 Safety ........................................................................................................................................................................ ES-7 ES.6 Construction .......................................................................................................................................................... ES-7 ES.7 Operations and Ridership ...............................................................................................................................
  • Commuter Parking Needs Analysis Report

    Commuter Parking Needs Analysis Report

    Draft COMMUTER PARKING NEEDS ANALYSIS REPORT CITY OF BELLEVUE December 2013 Transportation Department Draft PHOTO BY WSDOT CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 Purpose . 2 CONTEXT . 3 Comprehensive Plan Policies . 3 Transit Master Plan . 4 METHODOLOGY . 6 Transit Corridors . 6 Travel Demand Modeling . 8 PARK-AND-RIDE USE . 10 Modeling Results . 10 South Bellevue Park-and-Ride . 11 Eastgate Park-and-Ride . 12 CONCLUSIONS . 15 Recommendations . 15 REFERENCES . 17 APPENDICES . 18 Acknowledgements . 21 Draft Draft PHOTO BY John Tiscornia INTRODUCTION Commuter parking facilities play an important role in concentrating transit rider demand, often in lower-density areas that would otherwise be unable to support frequent services . These facilities provide convenient access to transit via automobile or bicycle for people who do not live within convenient walking distance of a standard bus stop . Park-and-ride facilities also serve as a meeting place for carpool and vanpool partners . As the regional inventory of housing and employment grows, the demand for roadway capacity increases . Because roadway capacity and the ability to expand roadways is limited, park-and-ride lots provide an important amenity that supports the use of alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle, thereby requiring less overall roadway capacity . Further, by concentrating transit boardings at a single point, a more frequent level of service can be supported . This report reviews commuter parking demand assessments for the greater Bellevue area and considers this demand in light of existing parking facilities . BELLEVUE TRANSIT MASTER PLAN 1 Purpose It is commonly observed that not every park-and- ride lot has the necessary capacity to meet its current demand .
  • Rapidride K Line: Speed and Reliability Improvements 2

    Rapidride K Line: Speed and Reliability Improvements 2

    1 of 14 Funding Application Competition Regional FTA Application Type Main Competition Status submitted Submitted: April 27th, 2020 3:29 PM Prepopulated with screening form? Yes Project Information 1. Project Title RapidRide K Line: Speed and Reliability Improvements 2. Regional Transportation Plan ID 1027 3. Sponsoring Agency King County Metro 4. Cosponsors N/A 5. Does the sponsoring agency have "Certification Acceptance" status from WSDOT? N/A 6. If not, which agency will serve as your CA sponsor? N/A 7. Is your agency a designated recipient for FTA funds? Yes 8. Designated recipient concurrence N/A Contact Information 1. Contact name Eric Irelan 2. Contact phone 206-477-3862 3. Contact email [email protected] Project Description 1. Project Scope This project scope will construct and implement transit speed and reliability improvements for the RapidRide K Line which is scheduled to begin service in 2025. RapidRide K Line will operate between the Kirkland Totem Lake Regional Growth Center and the Eastgate Park and Ride in Bellevue. This new RapidRide Line will replace portions of Metro Route 239, 250, 255, and 271. The K Line will provide service to Downtown Kirkland (a proposed Regional Growth Center), Bellevue Regional Growth Center and local centers along the corridor such as Bellevue College. College. 2 of 14 Proposed improvements include construction of bus lanes, queue jumps, turning restrictions, bus bulbs, signal timing optimization, bus stop spacing management, transit signal priority, turn lanes, traffic channelization improvements, and layover improvements to enhance bus operations. These improvements will provide faster travel times, improve on-time reliability, and safer more convenient access to destinations and transit centers served across the entire 15.24 mile RapidRide I Line corridor.
  • Monday Through Friday Mt

    Monday Through Friday Mt

    New printed schedules will not be issued if trips are adjusted Monday through Friday All trips accessible by five minutes or less. Please visit www.go-metro.com for the go smart... go METRO 24 most up-to-date schedule. 24 Mt. Lookout–Uptown–Anderson Riding Metro From Anderson / To Downtown From Downtown / To Anderson . 1 No food, beverages or smoking on Metro. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2. Offer front seats to older adults and people with disabilities. METRO* PLUS 3. All Metro buses are 100% accessible for people 38X with disabilities. 46 UNIVERSITY OF 4. Use headphones with all audio equipment 51 CINCINNATI GOODMAN DANA MEDICAL CENTER HIGHLAND including cell phones. Anderson Center Station P&R Salem Rd. & Beacon St. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Liberty St. & Sycamore St. Square Government Area B Square Government Area B Liberty St. & Sycamore St. & Auburn Ave. McMillan St. Martin Luther King & Reading Rd. & Madison Ave. Observatory Ave. & Ave. Linwood Delta Ave. & Beechmont Ave. St. Corbly Salem Rd. & Beacon St. Anderson Center Station P&R 11 ZONE 2 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 1 ZONE 2 43 5. Fold strollers and carts. BURNET MT. LOOKOUT AM AM 38X 4:38 4:49 4:57 5:05 5:11 5:20 5:29 5:35 5:40 — — — — 4:10 4:15 4:23 — 4:35 OBSERVATORY READING O’BRYONVILLE LINWOOD 6.
  • Appendix E: Notification Materials

    Appendix E: Notification Materials

    Appendix E: Notification Materials DOWNTOWN BELLEVUE East Link light rail Public Open House Open House will be from 4 to 7 p.m. Sound Transit is currently analyzing four new alternatives for the East Link project in downtown (presentation begins at 5 p.m.) Bellevue. The new alternatives are based upon outside expert review and requests from the Bellevue City Council. At the Open House, Sound Transit’s East Link project team Thursday, Feb. 18, 2010 will report on conceptual designs and analysis of the following alternatives as directed Bellevue City Hall Concourse by the Sound Transit Board of Directors: 450 110th Ave. NE, Bellevue C9T – 110th NE Tunnel Alternative C11A – 108th NE At-Grade Alternative Getting there: C9A – 110th NE At-Grade Alternative C14E – 114th NE Elevated Alternative Bellevue City Hall is located near the Bellevue Transit Center, which is The Downtown Bellevue Concept Design Report evaluates cost, ridership, traffi c operations, served by regional and local buses. City Hall parking is available on a environmental impacts, plan consistency, construction effects and risk for each of the new fi rst-come, fi rst-served basis, and is free to those doing business with alternatives. The Sound Transit Board will use the report and public comments to determine the City or attending meetings at City Hall. Visitor parking entrance is located on 110th Avenue. if reconsidering the preferred alternative, the C4A At-Grade Couplet, is needed in downtown Bellevue. Sound Transit Board action is scheduled for Spring 2010. To review the Concept Design Report: Please visit www.soundtransit.org/eastlink, or contact Katie Kuciemba, Community Outreach Specialist at 206-398-5459 or [email protected].
  • Balancing Passenger Preferences and Operational Efficiency in Network

    Balancing Passenger Preferences and Operational Efficiency in Network

    Risk Averseness Regarding Short Connections in Airline Itinerary Choice AV020 Annual Meeting 2006 Submission Date: 01 April 2006, Word Count: 6902 By: Georg Theis Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Room 35-217 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel.: (617) 253-3507 Fax: (270) 968-5529 Email: [email protected] Thomas Adler Resource Systems Group 55 Railroad Row White River Junction, VT 05001 Tel.: (802) 295-4999 Fax: (802) 295-1006 Email: [email protected] John-Paul Clarke School of Aerospace Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0150 Tel: (404) 385-7206 Fax: (404) 894-2760 Email: [email protected] Moshe Ben-Akiva Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Room 1-181 77 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02139 Tel.: (617) 253-5324 Fax: (617) 253-0082 Email: [email protected] Theis et al. 2 ABSTRACT Network airlines traditionally attempt to minimize passenger connecting times at hub airports based on the assumption that passengers prefer minimum scheduled elapsed times for their trips. Minimizing connecting times, however, creates peaks in hub airports’ schedules. These peaks are extremely cost intensive in terms of additional personnel, resources, runway capacity and schedule recovery. Consequently, passenger connecting times should only be minimized if the anticipated revenue gain of minimizing passenger connecting times is larger than the increase in operating cost, i.e. if this policy increases overall operating profit. This research analyzes to what extent a change in elapsed time impacts passenger itinerary choice and thus an airline’s market share. We extend an existing airline itinerary choice survey to test the assumption that passenger demand is affected by the length of connecting times.
  • Fenomén K-Pop a Jeho Sociokulturní Kontexty Phenomenon K-Pop and Its

    Fenomén K-Pop a Jeho Sociokulturní Kontexty Phenomenon K-Pop and Its

    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI PEDAGOGICKÁ FAKULTA Katedra hudební výchovy Fenomén k-pop a jeho sociokulturní kontexty Phenomenon k-pop and its socio-cultural contexts Diplomová práce Autorka práce: Bc. Eliška Hlubinková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Filip Krejčí, Ph.D. Olomouc 2020 Poděkování Upřímně děkuji vedoucímu práce Mgr. Filipu Krejčímu, Ph.D., za jeho odborné vedení při vypracovávání této diplomové práce. Dále si cením pomoci studentů Katedry asijských studií univerzity Palackého a členů české k-pop komunity, kteří mi pomohli se zpracováním tohoto tématu. Děkuji jim za jejich profesionální přístup, rady a celkovou pomoc s tímto tématem. Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně s použitím uvedené literatury a dalších informačních zdrojů. V Olomouci dne Podpis Anotace Práce se zabývá hudebním žánrem k-pop, historií jeho vzniku, umělci, jejich rozvojem, a celkovým vlivem žánru na společnost. Snaží se přiblížit tento styl, který obsahuje řadu hudebních, tanečních a kulturních směrů, široké veřejnosti. Mimo samotnou podobu a historii k-popu se práce věnuje i temným stránkám tohoto fenoménu. V závislosti na dostupnosti literárních a internetových zdrojů zpracovává historii žánru od jeho vzniku až do roku 2020, spolu s tvorbou a úspěchy jihokorejských umělců. Součástí práce je i zpracování dvou dotazníků. Jeden zpracovává názor české veřejnosti na k-pop, druhý byl mířený na českou k-pop komunitu a její myšlenky ohledně tohoto žánru. Abstract This master´s thesis is describing music genre k-pop, its history, artists and their own evolution, and impact of the genre on society. It is also trying to introduce this genre, full of diverse music, dance and culture movements, to the public.