DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Book GOVERNING PRIORITIES Advice for America’s President, for 2021 and Beyond YUVAL LEVIN, EDITOR AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE GOVERNING PRIORITIES Advice for America’s President, for 2021 and Beyond YUVAL LEVIN, EDITOR AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE © 2020 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the Ameri- can Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the pub- lications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. American Enterprise Institute 1789 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 www.aei.org Printed in the United States of America Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1. Restore America’s Promise as the Crisis Subsides ................................. 5 Nicholas Eberstadt 2. Take On America’s Five Key National Security Challenges .............. 27 Kori Schake 3. Strengthen the Post-Pandemic Economy .............................................. 37 Michael R. Strain 4. Confront the Debt Challenge Realistically ........................................... 47 James C. Capretta 5. Rethink Tax Policy to Address the Long-Term Fiscal Imbalance ..... 59 Alan D. Viard 6. Revitalize America’s Cities ...................................................................... 70 Ryan Streeter 7. Make the 2020s a Decade of Reform ..................................................... 88 Yuval Levin 8. Promote Steady Administration ........................................................... 103 Adam J. White 9. “Remember the Answers” to Misguided Radicalism ......................... 116 Matthew Continetti About the Authors .............................................................................................. 136 iii Introduction YUVAL LEVIN his book is a guide for governing in an exceptionally complicated Tmoment for America. That moment is defined by not only the diffi- culties of confronting a global pandemic and its aftermath but also a range of long-standing predicaments that have tended to complicate each other. The thicket of our governing challenges is now so dense that the definition and prioritization of problems has become difficult, and our leaders clearly need some help. The president of the United States is not the only leader who requires such help. But setting priorities for policymaking at the national level often does fall to the government’s chief executive, and the beginning of a presidential term in any case offers a convenient occasion to focus on the nation’s needs. And yet, the intense polarization that has characterized our 21st-century politics and the bitterly acrimonious culture war that has increasingly deformed our national life make it difficult to rise to that occasion. When we think about the country’s challenges, we are all tempted to think in partisan terms. To resist that temptation, even if only a little, we at the American Enter- prise Institute have given the authors of this volume a peculiar task. We asked nine of our scholars (though we easily could have called on dozens more) to offer guidance in their broad areas of expertise that the president might find useful in 2021 and beyond. But we intentionally asked them to do this while the presidential election of 2020 whirls in the background, and so before we know who will win it. They therefore have to offer advice not to Donald Trump or Joe Biden but to America’s president. They have to consider not the objectives of a Republican or a Democrat but the needs of the nation. 1 2 GOVERNING PRIORITIES This book is thus an experiment in shooting straight in crooked times. Its purpose is not to ignore the political culture and partisan atmosphere of this moment in our politics; no serious policy analysis or proposal for reform could ignore those. Rather, the point is precisely to take full account of those but correct for them as far as possible, to try to filter out the clatter and think about those problems that will need to be taken up by whoever is elected president. One consequence of that aspiration for clarity is that this book does not seek to touch on every policy domain or offer advice to each government agency or cabinet department. In the course of their work, our scholars engage with essentially every policy challenge that confronts our public offi- cials. They have views they are eager to share on all those fronts. But in this collection, by stepping back a little from the general din, we aim to emphasize a few key issues that should be particularly high on the country’s agenda. Another consequence—indeed, a particular benefit—of this approach is that it can enable us to take stock of how changing circumstances might require changes in the two parties’ long-standing to-do lists. The era we are living through is a time of reconsideration and, in some respects, even political realignment. It would be easy to miss that by viewing our politics through familiar ideological lenses alone. This period is raising some ques- tions about the value of those very lenses, so it may be best judged apart from them—in ways that leave some room for reprioritizing core aims, if also for reaffirming core values. All of that, however, is not to say that this volume’s authors do not begin with their own ideals and priorities. The American Enterprise Institute has no party line, but its scholars share a broad disposition. We begin from a love of our country and an appreciation of the need to cherish what has made it lovely. We value America’s capacity to foster the preconditions for human flourishing—strong families and communities, social order and equal justice under law, dignity embodied in honest work and active citi- zenship, prosperity made possible by competition and innovation, com- passion reified in the commitment to opportunity for all, and security realized through a robust advancement of America’s ideals and a tenacious defense of its interests. These core principles leave a lot of room for debate about particular policy courses, and AEI scholars sometimes disagree with one another. INTRODUCTION 3 That much is evident even in this collection. But they always offer honest advice, rooted in those core ideals and informed by deep expertise and experience. That is what we seek to make available here to the president sworn into office in 2021. For all these reasons, the proposals in this book do not involve easy measures sure to make the president popular. They point to those chal- lenges that will be hardest to confront but irresponsible to avoid. As you will see from both the subjects taken up and the mode in which they are tackled, these chapters aim to help the president think deeply about not only the means of government but also its aims. Our politics now has real trouble coming to terms with the American pub- lic’s actual concerns and priorities and real difficulty conceiving of policy tools by which public-spirited objectives might be best achieved. This is not a new problem, of course. In Federalist 62, James Madison identified it as perennial: A good government implies two things: first, fidelity to the object of government, which is the happiness of the people; secondly, a knowledge of the means by which that object can be best attained. Some governments are deficient in both these qualities; most governments are deficient in the first. I scruple not to assert, that in American governments too little attention has been paid to the last. The federal Constitution avoids this error; and what merits particular notice, it provides for the last in a mode which increases the security for the first. This remains true of our Constitution, but it is not always true of our government in practice. In this moment, our public officials need help satisfying both of Madison’s criteria for good government. Our hope is to offer some assistance in both regards. The job of the president of the United States is never easy. The bur- dens of responsibility laid on that office are unmatched in the world. But the potential to do good is very great. To make the most of that potential requires careful prioritization, balanced judgment, foresight, and politi- cal courage. How the executive might cultivate and deploy these in the months and years to come is the subject of each chapter that follows and this volume as a whole. 1 Restore America’s Promise as the Crisis Subsides NICHOLAS EBERSTADT merica is in the midst of its greatest crisis since World War II. At this A writing, we cannot yet confidently tell when the COVID-19 pandemic will end. More than half a year into its US outbreak, new infections are still out of control. Since it is a novel coronavirus—SARS-CoV-2 is a pathogen with which humanity has no previous experience—this immense threat is also by definition a fundamentally unfamiliar one. When—and whether— we can create a safe and effective vaccine and how many waves of conta- gion will roll through our country before COVID-19 subsides are at present unanswerable questions. Under the terrible pressure of the pandemic (whose ration of public suffering, we must add, has been greater than necessary due to policy bungling), social, economic, and political fault lines in our country have been painfully exposed and enflamed. We endure today not only a socio- economic emergency but also an explosion of radicalized anger that has spilled into the streets. These current troubles have historical roots: prob- lems long festering and long ignored. Washington has responded to the pandemic with an unprecedented peacetime mobilization of national resources. Already Congress has authorized trillions of dollars in “stimulus” spending to support distressed businesses and households, and the Federal Reserve System has commit- ted additional trillions—with no end yet in sight.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations
    The Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations Updated January 6, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44725 Position of Secretary of Defense: Statutory Restrictions and Civilian-Military Relations Summary The position of Secretary of Defense is unique within the United States government; it is one of two civilian positions within the military chain of command, although unlike the President, the Secretary of Defense is not elected. Section 113 of the United States Code states that the Secretary of Defense is to be “appointed from civilian life by the President, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.” The section goes on to elaborate a key mechanism by which civilian control of the armed forces is maintained: A person may not be appointed as Secretary of Defense within seven years after relief from active duty as a commissioned officer of a regular component of an armed force. The proposed nomination of General (Ret.) Lloyd Austin, United States Army, who retired from the military in 2016, to be Secretary of Defense may lead both houses of Congress to consider whether and how to suspend, change, or remove that provision. This provision was originally contained in the 1947 National Security Act (P.L. 80-253), which mandated that 10 years pass between the time an officer is relieved from active duty and when he or she could be appointed to the office of the Secretary of Defense. In 2007, Section 903 of the FY2008 National Defense Authorization Act (P.L. 110-181), Congress changed the period of time that must elapse between relief from active duty and appointment to the position of Secretary of Defense to seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of the Income Tax (Or, the Rise of America's Universal Wage
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 95 Issue 4 Article 5 Fall 2000 The Death of the Income Tax (or, The Rise of America’s Universal Wage Tax) Edward J. McCaffery University of Southern California;California Institute of Tecnology, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Estates and Trusts Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, Taxation-Federal Estate and Gift Commons, Taxation-State and Local Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation McCaffery, Edward J. (2000) "The Death of the Income Tax (or, The Rise of America’s Universal Wage Tax)," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 95 : Iss. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol95/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Death of the Income Tax (or, The Rise of America’s Universal Wage Tax) EDWARD J. MCCAFFERY* I. LOOMINGS When Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, just weeks into her tenure as America’s youngest member of Congress, floated the idea of a sixty or seventy percent top marginal tax rate on incomes over ten million dollars, she was met with a predictable mixture of shock, scorn, and support.1 Yet there was nothing new in the idea. AOC, as Representative Ocasio-Cortez is popularly known, was making a suggestion with sound historical precedent: the top marginal income tax rate in America had exceeded ninety percent during World War II, and stayed at least as high as seventy percent until Ronald Reagan took office in 1981.2 And there is an even deeper sense in which AOC’s proposal was not as radical as it may have seemed at first.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Annual Report
    The New Conservative Flagship ANNUAL REPORT 2020A About American Compass Table of Contents Our Mission To restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity: 1 Founder’s Letter 4 REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions. SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self- sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next 2 Year in Review 10 generation for the same. Conservative Flagship 12 HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. Changing the Debate 14 Our Activities Creating Community 16 AFFILIATION. Providing opportunities for people who share its mission to The Commons 18 build relationships, collaborate, and communicate their views to the broader political community. Our Growing Influence 20 DELIBERATION. Supporting research and discussion that advances understanding of economic and social conditions and tradeoffs through study of history, analysis of data, elaboration of theory, and development of policy 3 Our Work 21 proposals. ENGAGEMENT. Initiating and facilitating public debate to challenge existing Rebooting the American System 22 orthodoxy, confront the best arguments of its defenders, and force scrutiny of unexamined assumptions and unconsidered consequences. Coin-Flip Capitalism 26 Our Principles Moving the Chains 30 AMERICAN COMPASS strives to embody the principles and practices of a healthy democratic polity, combining intellectual combat with personal civility. Corporate Actual Responsibility 34 We welcome converts to our vision and value disagreement amongst A Seat at the Table 38 our members.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of a Consumption Tax for California
    An Analysis of a Consumption Tax for California 1 Fred E. Foldvary, Colleen E. Haight, and Annette Nellen The authors conducted this study at the request of the California Senate Office of Research (SOR). This report presents the authors’ opinions and findings, which are not necessarily endorsed by the SOR. 1 Dr. Fred E. Foldvary, Lecturer, Economics Department, San Jose State University, [email protected]; Dr. Colleen E. Haight, Associate Professor and Chair, Economics Department, San Jose State University, [email protected]; Dr. Annette Nellen, Professor, Lucas College of Business, San Jose State University, [email protected]. The authors wish to thank the Center for California Studies at California State University, Sacramento for their [email protected]; Dr. Colleen E. Haight, Associate Professor and Chair, Economics Department, San Jose State University, [email protected]; Dr. Annette Nellen, Professor, Lucas College of Business, San Jose State University, [email protected]. The authors wish to thank the Center for California Studies at California State University, Sacramento for their funding. Executive Summary This study attempts to answer the question: should California broaden its use of a consumption tax, and if so, how? In considering this question, we must also consider the ultimate purpose of a system of taxation: namely to raise sufficient revenues to support the spending goals of the state in the most efficient manner. Recent tax reform proposals in California have included a business net receipts tax (BNRT), as well as a more comprehensive sales tax. However, though the timing is right, given the increasingly global and digital nature of California’s economy, the recent 2008 recession tabled the discussion in favor of more urgent matters.
    [Show full text]
  • S E R I E S the Fiscal Policy Context for A
    SERIES FEDERAL BUDGET The Fiscal Policy Context for a Conservative Reform Agenda JAMES C. CAPRETTA Edited by Yuval Levin and Ramesh Ponnuru FEDERAL BUDGET First Edition All Rights Reserved: Copyright © 2015 by Conservative Reform Network No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission, except where permitted by law. Printed in the USA 2. FEDERAL BUDGET Published by: FEDERAL BUDGET 4. The Fiscal Policy Context for a Conservative Reform Agenda JAMES C. CAPRETTA 5. Dear Reader: The Conservative Reform Network (CRN) recognizes that today’s challenges won’t be met by yesterday’s solutions. That’s why we are eager to deliver a new series of important policy papers that will offer fresh, innovative solutions to some of the biggest policy challenges facing America—practical solutions that are ready to be put into action. John Murray Chairman Building on the tremendous success of our 2014 essay collection, Room to Grow: Conservative Reforms for a Limited Government and a Thriving Middle Class, we are pleased to bring you Room to Grow: A Series. Each briefing book in the series will tackle a specific set of domestic policy challenges and provide thoughtful analysis from a leading expert in the field. CRN commissioned this series of more than a dozen briefing books to show how a conservative agenda can empower individuals by replacing failed one-size-fits-all government programs with policies that foster opportunity, choice, and competition.
    [Show full text]
  • Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking
    AP PHOTO/CHARLES DHARAPAK PHOTO/CHARLES AP Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Process Makes Perfect Best Practices in the Art of National Security Policymaking By Kori Schake, Hoover Institution, and William F. Wechsler, Center for American Progress January 2017 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 6 Findings 14 First-order questions for the next president 17 Best practices to consider 26 Policymaking versus oversight versus crisis management 36 Meetings, meetings, and more meetings 61 Internal NSC staff management 72 Appendix A 73 About the authors 74 Endnotes Introduction and summary Most modern presidents have found that the transition from campaigning to governing presents a unique set of challenges, especially regarding their newfound national security responsibilities. Regardless of their party affiliation or preferred diplomatic priorities, presidents have invariably come to appreciate that they can- not afford to make foreign policy decisions in the same manner as they did when they were a candidate. The requirements of managing an enormous and complex national security bureau- cracy reward careful deliberation and strategic consistency, while sharply punishing the kind of policy shifts that are more common on the campaign trail. Statements by the president are taken far more seriously abroad than are promises by a candidate, by both allies and adversaries alike. And while policy mistakes made before entering office can damage a candidate’s personal political prospects, a serious misstep made once in office can put the country itself at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN EXPRESS CO (Form: 10-K, Filing Date: 03/31/1994)
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION FORM 10-K Annual report pursuant to section 13 and 15(d) Filing Date: 1994-03-31 | Period of Report: 1993-12-31 SEC Accession No. 0000004962-94-000006 (HTML Version on secdatabase.com) FILER AMERICAN EXPRESS CO Business Address AMERICAN EXPRESS TWR CIK:4962| IRS No.: 134922250 | State of Incorp.:NY | Fiscal Year End: 1231 WORLD FINANCIAL CTR Type: 10-K | Act: 34 | File No.: 001-07657 | Film No.: 94519780 NEW YORK NY 10285 SIC: 6211 Security brokers, dealers & flotation companies 2126402000 Copyright © 2012 www.secdatabase.com. All Rights Reserved. Please Consider the Environment Before Printing This Document ============================================================================= SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 --------------------------- FORM 10-K --------------------------- /X/ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 OR / / TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File No. 1-7657 AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) New York 13-4922250 (State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. employer of incorporation or organization) identification no.) American Express Tower World Financial Center New York, New York 10285 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 640-2000 Securities registered pursuant
    [Show full text]
  • The OECD's "Action Plan"
    Working Paper Series WP 15-14 SEPTEMBER 2015 The OECD’s “Action Plan” to Raise Taxes on Multinational Corporations Gary Hufbauer, Euijin Jung, Tyler Moran, and Martin Vieiro Abstract Th e Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has embarked on an ambitious multipart project, titled Base Erosion and Profi t Shifting (BEPS), with 15 “Actions” to prevent multinational corporations (MNCs) from escaping their “fair share” of the tax burden. Although the tax returns of these MNCs comply with the laws of every country where they do business, the proposition that MNCs need to pay more tax enjoys considerable political resonance as government budgets are strained, the world economy is struggling, income inequality is rising, and the news media have publicized instances of corporations legally lowering their global tax burdens by reporting income in low-tax juris- dictions and expenses in high-tax jurisdictions. To achieve the goal of increasing taxes on MNCs, the OECD—spurred by G-20 fi nance ministers—recommends changes in national legislation, revision of existing bilateral tax treaties, and a new multilateral agreement for participating countries. Th is working paper provides a critical evaluation, from the standpoint of US economic interests, of each of the OECD plan’s 15 Actions. Given that the US system taxes MNCs more heavily than other advanced countries and provides fewer tax-incentives for research and development (R&D), implementation of the BEPS Actions would drive many MNCs to “invert” (i.e., relocate their headquarters to tax-friendly countries) and others to off shore signifi cant amounts of R&D activity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of American Tax Administration: Conceptual Alternatives and Political Realities
    Florida State University College of Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Publications 2016 The Future of American Tax Administration: Conceptual Alternatives and Political Realities Steve R. Johnson Florida State University College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles Part of the Administrative Law Commons, Taxation-Federal Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Steve R. Johnson, The Future of American Tax Administration: Conceptual Alternatives and Political Realities, 7 COLUM. J. TAX L. 5 (2016), Available at: https://ir.law.fsu.edu/articles/237 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLES THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN TAX ADMINISTRATION: CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVES AND POLITICAL REALITIES Steve R. Johnson* * University Professor, Florida State University College of Law, [email protected]. I thank the participants in the conference at which this paper originally was discussed: the March 2015 Tax Policy Symposium: Reforming the IRS sponsored by the University of Minnesota Law School Corporate Institute Forum on Taxation and Regulation. © 2016 Johnson. This is an open-access publication distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits the user to copy, distribute, and transmit the work provided that the original authors and source are credited. 6 COLUMBIA JOURNAL OF TAX LAW [Vol.7:5 I. INTERSECTING FORCES AND CURRENT CRISIS .............................................. 8 A. The Perfect Storm .................................................................................................. 8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Politics of Defense Reviews
    C O R P O R A T I O N The History and Politics of Defense Reviews Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2278 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9973-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1993 Bottom-Up Review starts with this challenge: “Now that the Cold War is over, the questions we face in the Department of Defense are: How do we structure the armed forces of the United States for the future? How much defense is enough in the post–Cold War era?”1 Finding a satisfactory answer to these deceptively simple questions not only motivated the Bottom-Up Review but has arguably animated defense strategy for the past quarter century.
    [Show full text]
  • Requirements for Military Effectiveness: Chile in Comparative Perspective Thomas C
    Cover photo caption: Former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet reviews military troops during the Great Military Parade in 2014. Photo credit: Chilean government. Disclaimer: The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and are not an official policy nor position of the Na- tional Defense University, the Department of Defense nor the U.S. Government. About the author: Dr. Thomas C. Bruneau is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of National Security Affairs at the Naval Postgrad- uate School (NPS). Dr. Bruneau was Chairman of the Department of National Security Affairs from 1989 until 1995. He became Director of the Center for Civil Military Relations in November 2000 and continued until December 2004. He is the author of six books, editor or co-editor of a dozen books, and the author of dozens of academic articles. He specializes in various security issues including street gangs, civil-military relations, and intelligence reform. He can be reached at [email protected]. Editor: Pat Paterson Layout Design: Viviana Edwards Requirements for Military Effectiveness: Chile in Comparative Perspective Thomas C. Bruneau William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies Perry Center Occasional Paper March 2020 Requirements for Military Effectiveness: Chile in Comparative Perspective Thomas C. Bruneau Introduction This paper utilizes a framework we have developed to analyze civil-military relations in terms of both democratic civilian control and effectiveness.1 As the achievement of effectiveness only makes sense in terms of the roles and missions actually implemented by the security forces in a country, the roles and missions will be spelled out. The focus in this paper will be on comparative analysis of four countries that the author finds to be relatively successful in achieving both democratic civilian control and ef- fectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • The New International Tax Regime Rebecca M
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL FORUM O CTOBER 25, 2018 Critiquing (and Repairing) the New International Tax Regime Rebecca M. Kysar abstract. In this Essay, I address three serious problems created—or left unaddressed—by the new U.S. international tax regime. First, the new international rules aimed at intangible in- come incentivize offshoring and do not sufficiently deter profit shifting. Second, the new patent box regime is unlikely to increase innovation, can be easily gamed, and will create difficulties for the United States at the World Trade Organization. Third, the new inbound regime has too gen- erous of thresholds and can be readily circumvented. There are ways, however, to improve upon many of these shortcomings through modest and achievable legislative changes, eventually paving the way for more ambitious reform. These recommendations, which I explore in detail below, in- clude moving to a per-country minimum tax, eliminating the patent box, and strengthening the new inbound regime. Even if Congress were to enact these possible legislative fixes, however, it would be a grave mistake for the United States to become complacent in the international tax area. In addition to the issues mentioned above, the challenges of the modern global economy will con- tinue to demand dramatic revisions to the tax system. introduction The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (TCJA)1 significantly changed the way the United States taxes multinational corporations on their cross-border income. The legislation, however, both failed to solve old problems in the international system and opened the door to new ones. Furthermore, the legislation will de- plete government resources, holding the United States back in the twentieth cen- tury rather than propelling it to be a competitive force and source of general wellbeing for its citizens in the current one.
    [Show full text]