DOCSLIB.ORG

S E R I E S the Fiscal Policy Context for A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S E R I E S the Fiscal Policy Context for A SERIES FEDERAL BUDGET The Fiscal Policy Context for a Conservative Reform Agenda JAMES C. CAPRETTA Edited by Yuval Levin and Ramesh Ponnuru FEDERAL BUDGET First Edition All Rights Reserved: Copyright © 2015 by Conservative Reform Network No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission, except where permitted by law. Printed in the USA 2. FEDERAL BUDGET Published by: FEDERAL BUDGET 4. The Fiscal Policy Context for a Conservative Reform Agenda JAMES C. CAPRETTA 5. Dear Reader: The Conservative Reform Network (CRN) recognizes that today’s challenges won’t be met by yesterday’s solutions. That’s why we are eager to deliver a new series of important policy papers that will offer fresh, innovative solutions to some of the biggest policy challenges facing America—practical solutions that are ready to be put into action. John Murray Chairman Building on the tremendous success of our 2014 essay collection, Room to Grow: Conservative Reforms for a Limited Government and a Thriving Middle Class, we are pleased to bring you Room to Grow: A Series. Each briefing book in the series will tackle a specific set of domestic policy challenges and provide thoughtful analysis from a leading expert in the field. CRN commissioned this series of more than a dozen briefing books to show how a conservative agenda can empower individuals by replacing failed one-size-fits-all government programs with policies that foster opportunity, choice, and competition. It is our belief that the demonstrable failure of the liberal welfare state provides an opportunity to advance conservative reforms, firmly rooted in our constitutional order, that advance the aspirations of all Americans. The books in this series were the subject of a conference that took place in Middleburg, Virginia, in April 2015. We are deeply grateful to the authors and the other talented policy experts who engaged in 6. lively discussions about these pressing issues during the conference. We owe special thanks to Yuval Levin and Ramesh Ponnuru, who skillfully edited all of the books in this series. They were there when we first conceived of this collection of reform conservative ideas, and together with Pete Wehner, have continued to offer support and direction. We are grateful for the invaluable advice of Karlyn Bowman, who reviewed our public opinion data. And we offer our sincere thanks to the Conservative Reform Policy Center and its donor, the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation, whose generosity made this project possible. Sincerely, John Murray Neil Bradley Chairman Chief Strategy Officer April Ponnuru Kate O’Beirne Senior Advisor Policy Advisor Stacey Johnson Executive Director The Conservative Reform Network (CRN), organized as a non-profit 501(c)(4), is the leading organization supporting the Conservative Reform Movement by producing, incubating, and promoting ideas, policies, and efforts to grow the American economy, expand the middle class, and create opportunity for all Americans. All section 501(c)(4) organizations must operate primarily to advance social welfare. The Conservative Reform Policy Center (CRPC) is organized and operated as a non-profit 501(c)(3) educational organization and is affiliated with CRN. 7. FEDERAL BUDGET 8. THE FISCAL POLICY CONTEXT FOR A CONSERVATIVE REFORM AGENDA JAMES C. CAPRETTA EDITED BY YUVAL LEVIN AND RAMESH PONNURU Conservatism in America is often associated with a strong preference for spending restraint and low taxation. That’s as it should be. Sound fiscal policy is essential for sound governance. History shows that powerful nations that engage in reckless spending and borrowing eventually fall into periods of decline. It would be disastrous if the United States were to drift into such a slide. Unfortunately, that’s no longer as remote a possibility as it once was. The federal government has grown steadily since the end of World War II, with new benefit programs and government agencies created with regularity by Congress. The cumulative effect of this steady expansion of power and authority is an unwieldy and massively expensive federal government that has yet to be restrained in any meaningful way by either political party. That would be problem enough, but the experience of the past several years has made matters much worse. In 2007, just as the United States was about to enter a period of rapid spending growth due to the retirement of the baby boom generation, the financial crisis hit and the economy went into a deep recession. President Obama then used his first two years in office to vastly expand the government’s reach and expense while ignoring the many warning signs of long-term fiscal danger. The result has been a run-up in federal debt that is without precedent in U.S. peacetime history. From 1950 to 2008, the average level of federal debt (defined as debt held by the public) 9. FEDERAL BUDGET was 40 percent of gross domestic product (GDP). After running a cumulative budget deficit of $7.1 trillion over the period 2009 to 2015, the federal government reached a debt level equal to 74 percent of GDP at the end of fiscal year 2015.1 This massive run-up in debt has turned an already challenging long-term budget outlook into a fast-approaching fiscal crisis. The debt is projected to rise without end as a percentage of GDP absent a major change in fiscal policy, and will exceed 100 percent of GDP by 2039.2 The solution to the nation’s fiscal challenges is a serious and far-reaching reform agenda, for two reasons. First, the crucial first objective of a conservative reform effort is to promote faster economic growth and rising middle-class incomes. An important reason for today’s bleak budget outlook is tepid growth. Without strong growth, the budgetary challenge becomes almost impossible to address except through very painful austerity. Second, a serious reform agenda will also take aim at the modern welfare state, in all of its many forms, which is not only expensive and growing rapidly but is also a drag on growth itself, with its many disincentives for work. Reform of the main entitlement programs is thus critically important on two levels: to remove barriers to a dynamic and motivated labor force, and thus to contribute to overall economic growth; and to pull fiscal policy back from the brink and allow for a level of taxation, both now and in the future, that is consistent with a growing and thriving economy. There are three dangers to avoid in implementing a conservative fiscal reform plan. First, reform should not focus exclusively on budget numbers. Conservatives too often fall into the trap of thinking that conservative policy starts and ends with a balanced budget, regardless of the policy orientation of the government. 10. The Fiscal Policy Context for a Conservative Reform Agenda JAMES C. CAPRETTA Such an outlook cedes the design of government programs and agencies to those more inclined to an expansive governmental role, and conservatives are left only to make the case that these programs must be smaller and less expensive. We should reject this way of thinking and instead begin with the view that the shape and direction of government policy is the real question. Our object should be better governance, including an improved budget outlook, with that improved outlook sometimes arising as a byproduct of policy reforms. The welfare reform of the 1990s offers a perfect example of this kind of policymaking. It transformed the structure of a key welfare program and helped millions transition from welfare to work. In the near term, that did not involve budgetary savings but rather a change in how federal welfare dollars were spent. But over the longer term, precisely because the reform successfully transformed the program, we have spent many billions less than we otherwise would have on the unreformed welfare system. Second, it is not possible to get the government’s fiscal house in order by focusing on marginal programs and agencies. In other words, the solution is not a series of cuts of $100 million from scores of smaller federal programs (as appropriate or well- deserved as those cuts might be). Rather, fiscal policy is driven by tax policy, defense spending, and the major entitlement programs. Improving the budget outlook means getting those big pieces right. This does not mean the immense array of federal programs and agencies should go unexamined. Far from it. A serious reform agenda will have the ambition to eliminate unnecessary programs and to reorient others. But the savings from such an effort will never be large enough to overcome the massive tidal wave of costs from unfinanced entitlement commitments. 11. FEDERAL BUDGET Third, conservatives must keep their eye on the long run and not chase after short-term goals. Very little is gained with across-the- board cuts to unreformed programs that will soon be reversed when political tides turn. There is no point, for example, in setting a firm deadline for reaching a balanced budget without thinking through whether that balance would be short-lived. If a slower downward trajectory of debt made for a sustainably balanced budget in the longer term, it would be a superior option. What’s needed are fundamental reforms that will change the direction of key programs in ways that will last for decades. This kind of project will take many years to achieve, and some very important policy changes are likely to require lengthy transition provisions to reassure voters who are accustomed to current arrangements. But the current welfare state wasn’t built in a day, and changing its orientation is going to require persistence and patience.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Annual Report
    The New Conservative Flagship ANNUAL REPORT 2020A About American Compass Table of Contents Our Mission To restore an economic consensus that emphasizes the importance of family, community, and industry to the nation’s liberty and prosperity: 1 Founder’s Letter 4 REORIENTING POLITICAL FOCUS from growth for its own sake to widely shared economic development that sustains vital social institutions. SETTING A COURSE for a country in which families can achieve self- sufficiency, contribute productively to their communities, and prepare the next 2 Year in Review 10 generation for the same. Conservative Flagship 12 HELPING POLICYMAKERS NAVIGATE the limitations that markets and government each face in promoting the general welfare and the nation’s security. Changing the Debate 14 Our Activities Creating Community 16 AFFILIATION. Providing opportunities for people who share its mission to The Commons 18 build relationships, collaborate, and communicate their views to the broader political community. Our Growing Influence 20 DELIBERATION. Supporting research and discussion that advances understanding of economic and social conditions and tradeoffs through study of history, analysis of data, elaboration of theory, and development of policy 3 Our Work 21 proposals. ENGAGEMENT. Initiating and facilitating public debate to challenge existing Rebooting the American System 22 orthodoxy, confront the best arguments of its defenders, and force scrutiny of unexamined assumptions and unconsidered consequences. Coin-Flip Capitalism 26 Our Principles Moving the Chains 30 AMERICAN COMPASS strives to embody the principles and practices of a healthy democratic polity, combining intellectual combat with personal civility. Corporate Actual Responsibility 34 We welcome converts to our vision and value disagreement amongst A Seat at the Table 38 our members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America
    Issue No. 4, Fall 2020 Enterprise Report Restoring Liberty, Opportunity, and Enterprise in America Sharing the Blessings of Freedom By Robert Doar During these difficult past few months, AEI scholars have been tackling all of our toughest challenges. We have written about the economy, of course, and the pandemic. We have called attention to the dangers posed by China. We have also written about the importance of employment to people trying to escape poverty. And we have not been afraid to take on the thorniest of issues in America: race. This topic is not new to AEI. In a previous period, our community played a key role in the national discussion, as scholars such as Ben Wattenberg, Bob Woodson, and Walter Berns reacted to the excess of the 1960s and 1970s. Back then, AEI scholars were for peaceful protests in Selma but against violent lawlessness in Newark or Columbia University. We were for civil rights under law but against quotas that defined people by their race or gender rather than the content of their character. We knew Jim Crow had to go, but we also believed in Justice John Marshall Harlan’s admonition that our laws should be color-blind and that our Constitution “neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” That spirit remains very much a part of who we are at AEI; I have written about it, and so has one of our newest scholars, Ian Rowe. Together, these principles promote economic opportunity for all and ensure that every American shares in the blessings of freedom and equality that make our country great.
    [Show full text]
  • True Conservative Or Enemy of the Base?
    Paul Ryan: True Conservative or Enemy of the Base? An analysis of the Relationship between the Tea Party and the GOP Elmar Frederik van Holten (s0951269) Master Thesis: North American Studies Supervisor: Dr. E.F. van de Bilt Word Count: 53.529 September January 31, 2017. 1 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Page intentionally left blank 2 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www.novapdf.com) Table of Content Table of Content ………………………………………………………………………... p. 3 List of Abbreviations……………………………………………………………………. p. 5 Chapter 1: Introduction…………………………………………………………..... p. 6 Chapter 2: The Rise of the Conservative Movement……………………….. p. 16 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 16 Ayn Rand, William F. Buckley and Barry Goldwater: The Reinvention of Conservatism…………………………………………….... p. 17 Nixon and the Silent Majority………………………………………………….. p. 21 Reagan’s Conservative Coalition………………………………………………. p. 22 Post-Reagan Reaganism: The Presidency of George H.W. Bush……………. p. 25 Clinton and the Gingrich Revolutionaries…………………………………….. p. 28 Chapter 3: The Early Years of a Rising Star..................................................... p. 34 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 34 A Moderate District Electing a True Conservative…………………………… p. 35 Ryan’s First Year in Congress…………………………………………………. p. 38 The Rise of Compassionate Conservatism…………………………………….. p. 41 Domestic Politics under a Foreign Policy Administration……………………. p. 45 The Conservative Dream of a Tax Code Overhaul…………………………… p. 46 Privatizing Entitlements: The Fight over Welfare Reform…………………... p. 52 Leaving Office…………………………………………………………………… p. 57 Chapter 4: Understanding the Tea Party……………………………………… p. 58 Introduction……………………………………………………………………… p. 58 A three legged movement: Grassroots Tea Party organizations……………... p. 59 The Movement’s Deep Story…………………………………………………… p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party: Burgeoning Or Beaten?
    Augsburg Honors Review Volume 5 Article 6 2012 The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen Florida Alantic University Alexa Robinson Florida Atlantic University Follow this and additional works at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Olsen, Philip and Robinson, Alexa (2012) "The eT a Party: Burgeoning or Beaten?," Augsburg Honors Review: Vol. 5 , Article 6. Available at: https://idun.augsburg.edu/honors_review/vol5/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Undergraduate at Idun. It has been accepted for inclusion in Augsburg Honors Review by an authorized editor of Idun. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Teo Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? 55 The Tea Party: Burgeoning or Beaten? Philip Olsen, Florida Atlantic University and Alexa Robsinson, Florida Atlantic University Philip Olsen and Alexa Robinson are sophomores at Florida Atlantic University and presented this paper at the 2011NCHC conference in Phoenix, Arizona. Philip is continuing to pursue his bachelor\ degree in English and philosophy and expects to graduate in 2014. 56 The Tea Party: Burgeoningor BgatqX I. Introduction The Tea Party is a grassroots political movement which has gained a considerable following since its inception in 2009.Its platform centers on a single issue -- greater fiscal responsibility and conservatism on the part of each respective level of government. In this paper we examine the question of whether or not the Tea Party will develop into a viable political entity. We concluded early on in the process of researching this paper that extensive statistical analysis would only be a fruitless endeavor because of the contemporaneity of the Tea Party movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Congress Is Weak Because Its Members Want It to Be
    CommentaryJULY/AUGUST 2018 DOUBLE ISSUE Congress Is Weak Because Its Members Want It to Be BY YUVAL LEVIN Game of Peacock Thrones BY SOHRAB AHMARI Should Jews Flee Europe? BY MELANIE PHILLIPS Commentary How Israel Became a JULY/AUGUST 2018 : VOLUME 146 NUMBER 1 146 : VOLUME 2018 JULY/AUGUST TV Powerhouse BY HANNAH BROWN Philip Roth’s My Time Among Joyless the Exuberance Anti-Israelites BY RUTH R. WISSE CANADA $7.00 : US $5.95 BY ARDIE GELDMAN We join in celebrating Israel’s 70 years. And Magen David Adom is proud to have saved lives for every one of them. Magen David Adom, Israel’s largest and premier emergency medical response agency, has been saving lives since before 1948. Supporters like you provide MDA’s 27,000 paramedics, EMTs, and civilian Life Guardians — more than 90% of them volunteers — with the training, equipment, and rescue vehicles they need. In honor of Israel’s 70th anniversary, MDA has launched a 70 for 70 Campaign that will put 70 new ambulances on the streets of Israel this year. There is no better way to celebrate this great occasion and ensure the vitality of the state continues for many more years. Please give today. 352 Seventh Avenue, Suite 400 New York, NY 10001 Toll-Free 866.632.2763 • [email protected] www.afmda.org Celebrate Israel’s 70th anniversary by helping put 70 new ambulances on its streets. FOR SEVENTY Celebrate Israel’s 70th anniversary by putting 70 new ambulances on its streets. please join us for the ninth annual COMMENTARY ROAST this year’s victim: JOE LIEBERMAN monday, october 8, 2018, new york city CO-CHAIR TABLES: $25,000.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CINCINNATI MYTH by Eliana Johnson Saturday Night Massacre, and IRS Discrimination Wasn’T Just the Work of Rogue Agents
    2013_07_01 subscribe:cover61404-postal.qxd 6/11/2013 8:18 PM Page 1 July 1, 2013 $4.99 JAY NORDLINGER: The Left’s Racial Putdowns KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON ON RAND AND STEINBECK JOHN J. MILLER HENRY OLSEN: IS RAND PAUL THE ANSWER? ON HARRY JAFFA Daniiel Foster w eliiaannaa Johnson w roobb lloonngg $4.99 tthhee eeDDittoorss 26 0 74820 08155 6 www.nationalreview.com base:milliken-mar 22.qxd 6/10/2013 2:27 PM Page 1 TOC:QXP-1127940144.qxp 6/12/2013 2:33 PM Page 1 Contents JULY 1, 2013 | VOLUME LXV, NO. 12 | www.nationalreview.com ON THE COVER Page 16 The Cincinnati Myth John J. Miller on Harry V. Jaffa p. 32 Two Cincinnati employees have told the House Oversight Committee that BOOKS, ARTS they were taking orders from Washington. One of those employees told & MANNERS the committee he began singling out tea- 41 LINCOLN’S PATH, STILL Jay Winik reviews Lincoln party applications at the request of a Unbound: How an Ambitious supervisor who told him “Washington, Young Railsplitter Saved the American Dream—And D.C., wanted some cases.” Eliana Johnson How We Can Do It Again, by Rich Lowry. COVER: ROMAN GENN 42 GREATNESS IN A DARK TIME ARTICLES Charles J. Cooper reviews Saving Justice: Watergate, the 16 THE CINCINNATI MYTH by Eliana Johnson Saturday Night Massacre, and IRS discrimination wasn’t just the work of rogue agents. Other Adventures of a Solicitor General, by Robert H. Bork. 18 ONE-PARTY TAXMEN by Daniel Foster Is it time to un-reform the civil service? 45 EPIC OF A NATION Daniel Johnson reviews Flight of 21 BUREAUCRATIC ROT by Rob Long the Eagle: The Grand Strategies A government, like a fish, decays from its guts.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutions Rules and Preferences
    Rules, Referendum and Fiscal Discipline. The Role of Preferences. Bernard Dafflon Department of Economics University of Fribourg Francesc Pujol Department of Economics University of Navarra ABSTRACT Many empirical studies show the efficacy of formal deficit constraints and deficits as means to control deficits. This result may lack of robustness if the potential endogeneity of institutions is not tested, as the causal effect could be produced by the omitted variable of voters’ preferences. We analyse this issue proposing hypothesis about the potential effect of preferences on the observed impact of institutions on deficits. We proceed to an empirical test applied to the 26 Swiss cantons. We find that the apparent efficacy of deficit constraints disappear when taking into account preferences, while the control effect of mandatory fiscal referendum is maintained. This results ask for a revision of the robustness of some results achieved in previous studies concerning the institutional performance as instruments to promote fiscal discipline. Rules, Referendum and Fiscal Discipline. The Role of Preferences. 1. Institutions and Fiscal Discipline. The Endogeneity Open Question. The growing support to the view that political and institutional settings have a role to play ensuring fiscal performance has paradoxically been accompanied by an increasing lack of confidence about the results achieved. Apparently, political institutions and budgetary institutions seem to be crucial for fiscal discipline. But, if certain institutions are more favorable to fiscal discipline, it would be possible that these mechanisms have been adopted because voters or politicians in this collectivity are more conservative against debt financing that in others collectivities with more "debt-friendly" settings.
    [Show full text]
  • Commenting on the Issues of the Moment
    Conversations with Bill Kristol Guest: Yuval Levin, National Affairs Taped July 29, 2014 Table of Contents I: National Affairs 0:15 – 13:45 II: Working in the White House 13:45 – 29:41 III: Battling Bureaucracy 29:41 – 45:28 IV: Burke and Modern Conservatism 45:28 – 1:04:26 V: Political Philosophy and Politics 1:04:26 – 1:18:02 I: National Affairs (0:15 – 13:45) KRISTOL: Welcome back to CONVERSATIONS. Our guest today is Yuval Levin, policy analyst, policy practitioner, a former White House staffer. And among other things, now editor of the very fine journal, National Affairs. What is National Affairs? Why National Affairs? LEVIN: Well, thank you. National Affairs is a quarterly journal of essays on domestic policy and political thought – political ideas. It tries to sit at the intersection of policy – concrete policy – and political theory and political thought. It exists really because in the wake of the 2008 elections, after a series of conversations among people on the right, including you, among others, we came to the view that one of the things that were missing on the right was a venue for people to think out loud in a serious way, both about policy ideas where the policy agenda seemed to be a little empty, and about political ideas about how, about what conservatism should mean in the 21st century and how that might apply to people’s lives. And we had a clear model. The model really was The Public Interest, which had run for 40 years and which had shut down about five years before that.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21St Century (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020)
    OUR COMMON REINVENTING AMERICAN PURPOSEDEMOCRACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY COMMISSION ON THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good. I have never whispered a syllable of them abroad. Within these walls they were born, and here they shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents were to report the objections he has had to it, and endeavor to gain partizans in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary effects and great advantages resulting naturally in our favor among foreign Nations as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent unanimity. —BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP OUR COMMON REINVENTING AMERICAN PURPOSEDEMOCRACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2020 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-133-3 This publication is available online at www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose. Suggested citation: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21st Century (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020). PHOTO CREDITS iStock.com/ad_krikorian: cover; iStock.com/carterdayne: page 1; Martha Stewart Photography: pages 13, 19, 21, 24, 28, 34, 36, 42, 45, 52,
    [Show full text]
  • THE ERIE ECHO “Voice for Life”
    THE ERIE ECHO “voice for life” Vol. XXXVII No. 1 www.peopleforlife.org January 2009 Meet Ramesh Ponnuru “You’ll love Ramesh!” – Jacki Ragan, a media fellow at Stanford University’s National Right to Life Director of State Hoover Institution. Organizational Development His book The Party of Death examines Ramesh Ponnuru will be the main abortion and euthanasia and how “pro- speaker at People for Life’s annual Pro-Life choice” activists have manipulated the Prayer Breakfast on Saturday, January 17. political parties, the judicial system, and the The event will be held in Erie at the mainstream media to advance their agenda. Ambassador Banquet & Conference Center. As the Evangelical leader Charles Colson Mr. Ponnuru is a Senior Editor of has observed, the book is a “carefully National Review Magazine and author of researched and rigorously argued work The Party of Death , published in 2006. [that] skillfully rebuts the seductive Of Asian Indian descent, Ramesh arguments of America’s merchants of Ponnuru grew up in Prairie Village, Kansas. death.” He graduated high school at age 16 and Dr. Robert George, the well-known went on to Princeton University, graduating McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at summa cum laude with a B.A. in history. Princeton, has described Ponnuru’s history Ponnuru has published articles in thesis as “superb” and “the kind of work one numerous newspapers including the New expects from a young professor.” The thesis York Times , the Washington Post , the Wall focused on a friend-of-the-court brief filed Street Journal , the Financial Times , by 281 (evidently pro-abortion) historians in Newsday , and the New York Post .
    [Show full text]
  • July 2018 July 8Th, 2018 12 Men and 8 Women NBC's Meet the Press
    July 2018 July 8th, 2018 12 men and 8 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 1 woman Sen. Roy Blunt (M) Sen. Dick Durbin (M) Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Eugene Robinson (M) Susan Page (W) Danielle Pletka (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 4 men and 2 women Amb. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (W) Sen. Joni Ernst (W) Sen. Christopher Coons (M) Mark Landler (M) Reihan Salam (M) Toluse Olorunnipa (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: 5 men and 2 women Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Alan Dershowitz (M) Asha Rangappa (W) Leonard Leo (M) Sen. Richard Blumenthal (M) Sara Fagen (W) Patrick Gaspard (M) CNN's State of the Union with Jake Tapper: *With Guest Host Dana Bash 2 men and 1 woman Dr. Carole Lieberman (W) Dr. Jean Christophe Romagnoli (M) Frm. Mayor Rudy Giuliani (M) Fox News' Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace: *With Guest Host Dana Perino 1 man and 2 women Amb. Kay Bailey Hutchinson (W) Sen. Lindsey Graham (M) Ilyse Hogue (W) July 15th, 2018 22 men and 6 women NBC's Meet the Press with Chuck Todd: 5 men and 1 woman Amb. Jon Huntsman (M) Sen. Mark Warner (M) Joshua Johnson (M) Amy Walter (W) Hugh Hewitt (M) Sen. Dan Sullivan (M) CBS's Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan: 7 men and 2 women Rep. Trey Gowdy (M) Sen. John Cornyn (M) Frm. Amb. Victoria Nuland (W) Tom Donilon (M) Rep. Joseph Crowley (M) Rachael Bade (W) Ben Domenech (M) Gerald Seib (M) David Nakamura (M) ABC's This Week with George Stephanopoulos: *With Guest Host Jonathan Karl 3 men and 2 women Amb.
    [Show full text]