The International Unexploded Ordnance Training Program (IUTP)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The International Unexploded Ordnance Training Program (IUTP) Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction Volume 6 Issue 2 The Journal of Mine Action Article 22 August 2002 The International Unexploded Ordnance Training Program (IUTP) Tom Gersbeck IUTP Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal Part of the Defense and Security Studies Commons, Emergency and Disaster Management Commons, Other Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, and the Peace and Conflict Studies Commons Recommended Citation Gersbeck, Tom (2002) "The International Unexploded Ordnance Training Program (IUTP)," Journal of Mine Action : Vol. 6 : Iss. 2 , Article 22. Available at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/cisr-journal/vol6/iss2/22 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for International Stabilization and Recovery at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction by an authorized editor of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gersbeck: The International Unexploded Ordnance Training Program (IUTP) International Unexploded Ordinance Training Program environment, rh is does nor mean rhey are ourse Details A student sets up a nor hazardous. Worse, many of these ring main with branch lines using The International items have gone through their arming T he UXO Technic ian Level I various knots and cycles and fa iled ro function or have been Course is a 200-hour course covering 25 other methods of modified by a rhird parry. All of these training days. The subject areas covered attachment. Unexploded Ordnance c i rcumsrances increase the threat ro first-re­ during the course are: c/o TEEX sponders as well as to rhe general public. • Course inrroduction and adminis­ Unfortunately, few civilian bomb rrarive requirements. Training Program (IUTP) technicians have had rhe opportunity to • UXO environmental remediation receive formal training on military overv1ew. ordnance and are woefull y unprepared ro • Mathematics, electricity and physics. Ongoing military conflicts, past wars and military trammg have management issues associated w ith a safely deal wirh these threats. The IUTP • Explosives and explosive effects. contaminated vast areas of the world with UXO. This course is designed to UXO cleanup. T hese sires are normally is designing two additional courses to • Fuze functioning and ordnance provide students with the skills they need to successfully function as a UXO located on closed military reservations or counter rhis menace ro public safety: one safety precautions. Technician's Assistant (Tech Level1). former milicary training areas. for first responders a nd another for • Surface, air, chemical and under­ The IUTP is not a demining program; civilian bomb technicians. These courses water ordnance identifica tion Station, parr of the TAMUS, is t he however, mines are categorized as ordnance by Tom Gersbeck, Program focus on rhe needs of civil ia n first­ (classroom and practical). location for this course. and are included in the training. The responders and bomb squad personnel. • Other various explosive hazards Coordinator, IUTP Rive rside Campus, on rhe site of the Initiated in 1997 and certified in course covers mines planted by individuals They are designed to prepare rhis fi rst line and pyrotechnics. former Bryan Air Force Base, encompasses 1999, the UXO Technic ian Level I or delivered by surface weapon systems or of defense with the information rhey will • Storage, handling and transporta­ 19,000 acres and contains ample classroom Introduction Course of the I UTP is t he only civilian aircraft, including shallow- and deep-water need ro p rotect rhe public wh il e tion of explosives. space and numerous practical exercise UXO training granted fu ll certification mines. Frequently in deminingoperations, increasing their chances of survival when • Demolition materials, firing sys­ areas. Located in rhe center of rhe former The I UTP is a component of the by the U.S. Department ofDefens e (DoD). numerous pieces ofUXO are encountered military ordnance, explosives or other tems & disposal procedures. runway complex, the demolition range National Emergency Response and Rescue The course is also approved by the Veterans before a mine is ever successfully located related hazards are encounrered. • Electric, non-electric and shock­ is spacious, well-prepared and profession­ Training Center (NERRTC), a division Administration, allowing U.S. military and neutralized, making ir extremely wbe firing systems (classroom and ally designed co accommodate 25 students of the Texas Engineering Extension veterans rhe opportunity to offset course important that perso nnel participating in The IUTP Staff practical). simultaneously. All of rhe practical Service (TEEX) and parr of rhe Texas A costs with their G I bill benefits. demining operations be well trained in • Four different pieces of geophysical demolition training is conducted on this & M University Sysrem (TAMUS). all aspects ofUXO. There are numerous The IUTP functions as a program equipment (classroom and practical). range. On rhe easr side of rhe former main Developed in 1948, TEEX is a world leader UTP Mission Focus programs in place to train human itarian within NERRTC and currently has one • Professional development seminar runway is the UXO range training area. in technical hands-on training and includes deminers; this course is designed ro educate permanent staff member and a large cadre (focusing on rhe UXO industry). Spread our over a six-acre area are four the largest fire-fighting training program T he IUTP sraff works closely with technicians on all groups, categories and of adjunct instructors. We have attracted • lndusrry seminar (dependent upon "grids" containing over 400 p ieces of in the world, robust law enforcement industry, government and academia to types of ordnance, as well as other aspects rhe most qualified personnel available ro personnel availability). ordnance for students to locate, excavate t raining and an extensive domesric address the wide range of UXO-related of area remediation. fi ll our insrrucror positions. lnsrrucrors Study-halls are offered nightly on and identifY. Seeded throughout rhe grids preparedness training program. Wirh rhe issues. The IUTP's primary focus is on G raduates of the UXO Technician are drawn from the UXO industry as well weekdays and on weekends upon student are various other metal objects to provide largest engineering school in the Unired military ordnance in relation to area Level 1 Course are certified to work as as rhe military explosive ordnance disposal request. At least one instructor is present false readings on rhe equipment, present­ States, it is only fitti ng thar Bryan/College remediation, public safety a nd sire UXO technician assiscanrs. With three years (EOD) community. Iris anticipated rhar ar all study-halls; however, iris common ing rhe srudents wirh a realistic situation ofexperience, a technician can be promoted the number of permanent staff positions to fin d two or more in attendance. After excavation, and ch allenging rhei r knowledge. to Technician Level 2 and after another five will grow in rhe future as requests for this TEEX students T hroughout the grids, rhe locations of identify and discuss years to Technician Level 3. This ability training increase. xams the UXO irems vary from lying on rhe final disposition of to advance within the industry from en­ Employing a large number ofad junct UXO. c/o TEEX surface ro a depth of 10 feet. Four grids try level (UXO Techn ician Level I) instruc tors provides the IUTP rhe Students are required ro pass rwo are used, one for each of the four different rh rough middle management (Techn ician opportunity to bring rhe most updated practical and three written exams during pieces of geophysical equipment covered Level 3) ensures a long-rerm career path skills and experiences from rhe industry the course, including an overall comprehen­ during rhe course. During rhe last week for all graduates. inro rhe classroom. It also allows us ro sive exam. Minimum passing scores are of training, students "hit rhe grids" to In the United States, there are many apply new techniques, equipment and 80 percent and 85 percent for wri tten and clear rh is sim ulated UXO sire. Students instances in which military ordnance technology thar wi ll be returned to the practical exams respectively. The grading are required ro lay out their grid; proper!y items are encounrered in civil ian com­ industry through our students. For example, criteria are ser high to ensure rhar IUTP employ the search equipment; locate, munities. Police and fire department the one permanent staff member, four graduates can operate wi th minimal excavate and identifY all ordnance encoun­ personnel are called upon ro address the adjunct insrructors and one guest speaker supervision on a UXO sire. tered; and correctly plot rhe UXO locations hazards UXO pose to public safety. supported the UXO Technician Level 1 on a grid map. Evidence of this can be found with any class, which concluded on March 22, civilian bomb squad, as most have training Training Facilities 2002. The EOD technician, UXO History of UXO aid li braries fu ll of military ordnance technician, UXOsupervisor and munitions The l UTP offices and pnmary emediation items recovered within their communities. management experience of these six training areas are located at Texas A & Though many of these items were never individuals rota led 120 years. employed on a battlefield or in a training M University's Riverside Campus. The The UXO Technician Level 1 course Published by JMU Scholarly Commons, 2002 • 102 • • 103 • 1 I Journal of Conventional Weapons Destruction, Vol. 6, Iss. 2 [2002], Art. 22 is based on the U.S. Navy Explosive Ord­ NAVSCOLEOD were allowed ro work mcnt dcvelopmenr ro rhe UXO industry. nance Disposal School (NAVSCOLEOD) as UXO technicians within the borders Without military support of this kind, ir curriculum.
Recommended publications
  • Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, & Territorial Partners
    Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, & Territorial Partners National Protection and Programs Directorate (NPPD) Office of Infrastructure Protection (IP) Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) October 2015 Homeland Security This product was developed in coordination with the Joint Program Office for Countering Improvised Explosive Devices (JPO C-IEDs). Introduction The Catalog of Federally Sponsored Counter-IED Training and Education Resources for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial (SLTT) Partners list explosives and IED-related Federal resources of value to SLTT partners. The Catalog was developed by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Office for Bombing Prevention (OBP) in collaboration with Federal interagency partners through the Joint Program Office for Countering Improvised Explosive Devices (JPO C-IED). The JPO C-IED is responsible for coordinating the implementation of the recently updated U.S. Policy for Countering IEDs. The resources in this Catalog support goals and capabilities outlined in the revised policy and are intended to enhance the effectiveness of U.S. counter-IED efforts, including: • Enhancing the ability to deter, detect, and prevent IEDs before threats become imminent. • Ensuring that protection and response efforts effectively neutralize or mitigate the consequences of attacks that do occur. • Leveraging and integrating a “whole-of-government” approach across law enforcement, diplomatic, homeland security, and military disciplines. • Promoting and enhancing information sharing and cooperation between all levels of the Federal government and SLTT partners. The Catalog identifies training and education resources that are provided directly by the Federal Government or are federally sponsored but delivered by a partner organization, such as the National Domestic Preparedness Consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • 4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System
    4030 ELITE Bomb Disposal Suit & Helmet System Mission Critical Protection for EOD Operators npaerospace.com 4030 ELITE Core Benefits Mission Critical EOD Protection ADVANCED OPTICAL PERFORMANCE Advanced ergonomic helmet design offers high protection The 4030 ELITE is the next generation Bomb Disposal Suit and Helmet and a wide field of view, with an active demisting visor System from NP Aerospace, a global leader in ballistic protection and Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) design and manufacturing. The high performance, user configurable suit offers 360° protection from the four main EMERGENCY REMOVAL & EXTRACTION aspects of an explosion: fragmentation, overpressure, blast wind and heat radiation. Patented two pull quick release system in jacket and trousers Developed in response to customer feedback and using the latest technology, it is certified enables removal in less than 30 seconds and a new drag to the NIJ 0117.01 Public Safety Bomb Suit Standard by the Safety Equipment Institute. rescue feature allows for rapid emergency extraction The 4030 ELITE delivers improved survivability and ergonomics and accelerated donning and doffing. Protection is enhanced across critical areas such as the neck and torso providing an optimum performance to weight ratio. OPTIMUM SURVIVABILITY AT A LOW WEIGHT High protection across critical areas such as The highly adaptable suit allows for optional customisation with mix and match jacket the torso and neck ensures blast forces are and trouser sizing options and interoperability with the latest user communications deflected and fragments are absorbed and electronics, eliminating the need for a full scale technology upgrade. The 4030 ELITE is the latest addition to the NP Aerospace Bomb Disposal Suit portfolio which is proven and trusted by thousands of EOD operators worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook on the Management of Munitions Response Actions
    United States Office of Solid Waste and EPA 505-B-01-001 Environmental Protection Emergency Response May 2005 Agency Washington, DC 20460 EPA Handbook on the Management of Munitions Response Actions Interim Final 000735 EPA Handbook on The Management of Munitions Response Actions INTERIM FINAL May 2005 000736 This page intentionally left blank. 000737 Disclaimer This handbook provides guidance to EPA staff. The document does not substitute for EPA’s statutes or regulations, nor is it a regulation itself. Thus, it cannot impose legally binding requirements on EPA, States, or the regulated community, and may not apply to a particular situation based upon the circumstances. This handbook is an Interim Final document and allows for future revisions as applicable. 000738 This page intentionally left blank. 000739 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS ..................................................... xiii ACRONYMS ...............................................................xxv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview...................................................... 1-1 1.2 The Common Nomenclature ....................................... 1-2 1.3 Organization of This Handbook .................................... 1-5 2.0 REGULATORY OVERVIEW ........................................... 2-1 2.1 Regulatory Overview............................................. 2-2 2.1.1 Defense Environmental Restoration Program .................... 2-2 2.1.2 CERCLA ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations
    The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science by Daniel Duffty, Class of 2010 __________________________ Audra Sosny, Class of 2010 __________________________ Date: May 5, 2009 Approved: Professor David Brown, IQP Advisor Abstract The project focused on the current and predicted impact of robots on surveillance, reconnaissance, automated defense, and bomb disposal operations. It investigated existing products and technologies to create a representation of society’s present opinions. The project considered technological, legal, and ethical concerns affecting the advancement of military robotics. It anticipates future developments by analyzing opinions from interviews and data from a survey. The project concluded that society endorses the evolution of robotics not involving lethal force that benefits the military. ii Executive Summary This project, entitled The Impact of Robots on Select Military Operations, studies the current and predicted impact of robots on surveillance, reconnaissance, automated defense, and bomb disposal operations. The project group, Daniel Duffty and Audra Sosny, investigated what robotic technologies are available, how the military presently uses robots, what society thinks about military robots, and what the future of military robots may hold. The use of robotics throughout all facets of society is rapidly increasing. As an emerging field with few developmental restrictions, society’s reaction to and support of robotics varies greatly. The problem is that society supports the military using robots for some purposes, but not all. Another problem is that society supports robots with certain capabilities, but not all.
    [Show full text]
  • Unexploded Ordnance: a Reference Guide for the Citizen
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BRIEFS FOR CITIZENS by M. Lambert Unexploded Ordnance: A Reference Guide for the Citizen This publication is published by the Hazard- he Technical Outreach Services contain lead, which might contaminate ous Substance Research Centers as part of their Technical Outreach Services for Com- for Communities (TOSC) pro- firing ranges on military bases. How- munities (TOSC) program series of Environ- Tgram of the Great Plains/ ever, many “formerly used defense mental Science and Technology Briefs for Rocky Mountain Hazardous Sub- sites” (known as FUDS in military par- Citizens. If you would like more information stance Research Center (HSRC) acts lance) have been left with unexploded about the TOSC program, contact your re- gional coordinator: as a source of technical expertise for ordnance that present a special kind of citizens at formerly used defense sites hazard to those workers involved with Northeast HSRC undergoing environmental cleanup. cleaning up the site, and for any future New Jersy Institute of Technology Many communities across the United use of the area. Otto H. York CEES 138 Warren St. States are near former military bases Types of former military installa- Newark, NJ 07102 that have environmental problems. A tions where UXO may be encountered (201) 596-5846 complication in the cleanup of these during environmental cleanup typically sites is the potential presence of UXO include depots where ordnance may Great Plains/Rocky Mountain HSRC Kansas State University (unexploded ordnance). TOSC pre- have been stored and decommissioned, 101 Ward Hall sents this reference about UXO to help as well as bombing, artillery, and gun- Manhattan, KS 66506 provide the general public with a nery ranges used for firing practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Unexploded Ordnance
    Detailed Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Threat & Risk Assessment Meeting the requirements of CIRIA C681 ‘Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) A guide for the Construction Industry’ Risk Management Framework PROJECT NUMBER P7462 ORIGINATOR L. Gregory VERSION NUMBER 1.0 REVIEWED BY B. Wilkinson (18th July 2019) CLIENT Campbell Reith RELEASED BY R. Griffiths (23rd July 2019) SITE Harrow (Northwick Park, HA1 3GX) RATING VERY HIGH - This Site requires further action to reduce risk to ALARP during intrusive activities. 6 Alpha Associates Limited, Unit 2A Woolpit Business Park, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9UP, United Kingdom T: +44 (0)2033 713 900 | W: www.6alpha.com Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... 5 STAGE ONE – SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .............................................................................. 6 Proposed Works ............................................................................................................................. 6 Ground Conditions ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MIL EOD STM Lesson 1.2.Pdf
    Lesson 1.2 Overview of United Nations Military Explosive Ordnance Disposal Units (MILEOD) 1 Lesson 1.2 Content • Terminology – key terms • UN use of the term EOD • Role of MILEOD • Aim of MILEOD deployment on Peacekeeping Missions • Direct support provided by EOD activities • EOD deployment considerations 2 Learning Outcomes Lesson 1.2 • Explain the key Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) terms • Explain the role and aim of MILEOD deployment in Peacekeeping Missions • Explain the direct support provided by EOD activities • Outline what planning considerations should be included when deploying a MILEOD 3 Abbreviations • AO: Area of Operation • IED: Improvised Explosive Device • AXO: Abandoned Explosive Ordnance • IEDD: Improvised Explosive Device Disposal • BAC: Battlefield Area Clearance • LOO: Lines of Operation • BCMD: Biological and Chemical • MILEOD: UN Military EOD units Munitions Disposal • OPCW: Organization for the • CBRN: Chemical, Biological, Radiological Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and Nuclear • PKO: Peacekeeping Operations • CMD: Conventional Munitions Disposal • ROE: Rules of Engagement • DtD: Defeat the Device • TCC: Troop Contributing Country • EO: Explosive Ordnance • UN: United Nations • EOD: Explosive Ordnance Disposal • UNMAS: United Nations Mine Action • ERW: Explosive Remnants of War Service • FP: Force Protection • UXO: Unexploded Ordnance • HN: Host Nation 4 Terminology – Key Terms • Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) • Explosive Ordnance (EO) • Conventional Munitions Disposal (CMD) • Improvised Explosive Device
    [Show full text]
  • Unexploded Ordnance a Critical Review of Risk Assessment Methods
    Unexploded Ordnance A Critical Review of Risk Assessment Methods Jacqueline MacDonald Debra Knopman J.R. Lockwood Gary Cecchine Henry Willis Prepared for the United States Army R Arroyo Center Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United States Army under Contract No. DASW01-01-C-0003. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Unexploded ordnance : a critical review of risk assessment methods / Jacqueline MacDonald ... [et al.]. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1674.” ISBN 0-8330-3432-4 (Paperback) 1. Explosive ordnance disposal. 2. Military bases—United States. 3. Military base closures—United States. 4. Hazardous substances—Risk assessment—United States. I. MacDonald, Jacqueline. UF860.U55 2003 355.6'213'0973—dc21 2003012740 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. Cover design by Barbara Angell Caslon © Copyright 2004 RAND Corporation All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from RAND. Published 2004 by the RAND Corporation 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 201 North Craig Street, Suite 202, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-1516 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org/ To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] PREFACE This report documents the findings of a study that examined meth- ods for assessing the risks of unexploded ordnance (UXO) and muni- tions constituents on former military training land.
    [Show full text]
  • TR-114 Fire Department Response to Biological Threat at B'nai B'rith
    U.S. Fire Administration/Technical Report Series Fire Department Response to Biological Threat at B’nai B’rith Headquarters Washington, DC USFA-TR-114/April 1997 U.S. Fire Administration Fire Investigations Program he U.S. Fire Administration develops reports on selected major fires throughout the country. The fires usually involve multiple deaths or a large loss of property. But the primary criterion T for deciding to do a report is whether it will result in significant “lessons learned.” In some cases these lessons bring to light new knowledge about fire--the effect of building construction or contents, human behavior in fire, etc. In other cases, the lessons are not new but are serious enough to highlight once again, with yet another fire tragedy report. In some cases, special reports are devel- oped to discuss events, drills, or new technologies which are of interest to the fire service. The reports are sent to fire magazines and are distributed at National and Regional fire meetings. The International Association of Fire Chiefs assists the USFA in disseminating the findings throughout the fire service. On a continuing basis the reports are available on request from the USFA; announce- ments of their availability are published widely in fire journals and newsletters. This body of work provides detailed information on the nature of the fire problem for policymakers who must decide on allocations of resources between fire and other pressing problems, and within the fire service to improve codes and code enforcement, training, public fire education, building technology, and other related areas. The Fire Administration, which has no regulatory authority, sends an experienced fire investigator into a community after a major incident only after having conferred with the local fire authorities to insure that the assistance and presence of the USFA would be supportive and would in no way interfere with any review of the incident they are themselves conducting.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Valley Partnering Meeting
    Page 1 of 3 Meeting Minutes, Community Interest Group Ricochet Area Munitions Response Site in State Game Lands 211, Pennsylvania October 27, 2011 ● East Hanover Township Building, Grantville, PA Community Interest Group Members and Project Staff Attendees Dennis Coffman Jim Rice Jo Anderson, Pennsylvania Army National Guard Debra Deis John Rossey Scott Bills, Pennsylvania Game Commission Larry Herr Dorman Shaver Kim Harriz, Army National Guard Directorate Randall Hurst Paul Shoop Emily Schiffmacher, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District Donald Kleinfelter Joseph Smith Jr. Major Edward Shank, Pennsylvania Army National Guard Mike Kneasel Ruth Smith LTC William Yearwood, Pennsylvania Army National Guard Joan Renninger Greg Daloisio, Weston Solutions, Inc. John Gerhard, Weston Solutions, Inc. Deb Volkmer, Weston Solutions, Inc. Other Attendees Peter Fisher Jay Megonnell Jan Sieger-Fisher Dreama O’Neal, Pennsylvania Army National Guard Sandy Herr Tom Powers David R. Keefer Shirley Shoop Galen D. Kleinfelter Sharon L. Southall, Lebanon Valley Hiking Club JoEllen Litz, Lebanon County Commissioner Handouts from the Meeting 1. Draft Meeting Minutes, Community Interest Group, Ricochet Area Munitions Response Site in State Game Lands 211, PA, June 30, 2011 2. Fact Sheet October 2011: Final Remedial Investigation Report Summary (Appendix A) 3. Community Interest Group/Public Meeting Evaluation Form Welcome Jo Anderson, Pennsylvania Army National Guard, welcomed the group, introduced the project team. A motion was made, seconded, and carried to approve the June 30, 2011 meeting minutes. Kim Harriz, Army National Guard Directorate, explained the tickets, drawing procedures, and prize ($30 gift certificate to the Appalachian Trail Conservancy store). Jim Rice asked if the Department of Defense (DoD) provided support to clear munitions when building the fire break on Second Mountain.
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress
    Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress Updated February 22, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22907 Cluster Munitions: Background and Issues for Congress Summary Cluster munitions are air-dropped or ground-launched weapons that release a number of smaller submunitions intended to kill enemy personnel or destroy vehicles. Cluster munitions were developed in World War II and are part of many nations’ weapons stockpiles. Cluster munitions have been used frequently in combat, including the early phases of the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. Cluster munitions have been highly criticized internationally for causing a significant number of civilian deaths, and efforts have been undertaken to ban and regulate their use. The Department of Defense (DOD) continues to view cluster munitions as a military necessity but in 2008 instituted a policy to reduce the failure rate of cluster munitions to 1% or less after 2018. In November 2017, a new DOD policy was issued that essentially reversed the 2008 policy. Under the new policy, combatant commanders can use cluster munitions that do not meet the 1% or less unexploded submunitions standard in extreme situations to meet immediate warfighting demands. In addition, the new policy does not establish a deadline to replace cluster munitions exceeding the 1% rate and states that DOD “will retain cluster munitions currently in active inventories until the capabilities they provide are replaced with enhanced and more reliable munitions.” Potential issues for Congress include cluster munitions in an era of precision weapons, other weapons in lieu of cluster munitions, and the potential impact of DOD’s 2017 revised cluster munitions policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Death and Injury from Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance in Afghanistan
    BRIEF REPORT Death and Injury From Landmines and Unexploded Ordnance in Afghanistan Oleg O. Bilukha, MD, PhD Context Afghanistan is one of the countries most affected by injuries due to land- Muireann Brennan, MD, MPH mines and unexploded ordnance. Bradley A. Woodruff, MD, MPH Objective To understand the epidemiological patterns and risk factors for injury due to landmines and unexploded ordnance. ANDMINES AND UNEXPLODED ORD- Design and Setting Analysis of surveillance data on landmine and unexploded ord- nance pose a significant public nance injuries in Afghanistan collected by the International Committee of the Red Cross health risk and economic threat in 390 health facilities in Afghanistan. Surveillance data were used to describe injury worldwide.1,2 Approximately 60 trends, injury types, demographics, and risk behaviors of those injured and explosive Lmillion to 70 million landmines are types related to landmine and unexploded ordnance incidents. placed in about 70 countries,3 and an esti- Participants A total of 1636 individuals injured by landmines and unexploded ord- mated 24000 individuals, mostly civil- nance, March 2001 through June 2002. ians, are killed or injured by landmines Results Eighty-one percent of those injured were civilians, 91.6% were men and boys, and unexploded ordnance worldwide and 45.9% were younger than 16 years. Children were more likely to be injured by every year.4 Unexploded ordnance unexploded ordnance (which includes grenades, bombs, mortar shells, and cluster mu- includes military explosive munitions nitions), whereas adults were injured mostly by landmines. The most common risk be- such as grenades, bombs, mortar shells haviors for children were playing and tending animals; for adults, these risk behaviors and cluster munitions, which have been were military activity and activities of economic necessity (eg, farming, traveling).
    [Show full text]