17Th Annual Gulf of Mexico Information Transfer Meeting
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
OCS Study MMS 99-0042 Proceedings: Seventeenth Annual Gulf of Mexico Information Transfer Meeting December 1997 1 r.. U.S. DeDartment of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study MMS 99-0042 Proceedings: Seventeenth Annual Gulf of Mexico Information Transfer Meeting December 1997 Editors Melanie Mckay Copy Editor Judith Nides Production Editor Prepared under MMS Contract 1435-0001-30665 by University of New Orleans Office of Conferences Services New Orleans, Louisiana 70148 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region September 1999 111 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Minerals Management Service (MMS) and the, University ofNew Orleans, Office of Conference Services. This report has been technically reviewed by the MMS and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with MMS editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY Extra copies of this report may be obtained from the Public Information Office (Mail Stop 5034) at the following address: U.S. Department of the Interior Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico OCS Region Public Infomiation Office (MS 5034) 1201 Elmwood Park Boulevard New Orleans, Louisiana 70123-23 94 Telephone Numbers: (504) 736-2519 1-800-200-GULF CITATION This study should be cited as: U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service. 1999. Proceedings: seventeenth annual Gulf of Mexico information transfer meeting, December 1997. U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Minerals Management Service, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, New Orleans, La. OCS Study MMS 990O42. 710 pp. V TABLE O CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES vii LIST OF TABLES Xxi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xxvii INTRODUCTION xxix SESSION 1A: DEEPWATER OPERATIONS, PART I - Chair: Mr. G. Ed Richardson, Co-Chair: Mr. Jim Regg SESSION IB: NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, PART I - Chair: Dr. Robert Rogers, Co-Chair: Mr. Robert Meyer 37 SESSION 1C: GEOGRAPHIC iNFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) APPLICATIONS - Chair: Dr. Norman Froomer, Co-Chair: Mr. Warren Barton 63 SESSION 1D: ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES - Chair: Dr. William T. Hutzell, Co-Chair: Ms. Terry Scholten 93 SESSION 2A: DEEPWATER OPERATIONS, PART II Chair: Mr. Jim Regg, Co-Chair: Mr. G. Ed Richardson 129 SESSION 2B: NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES PART II Chair: Dr. Robert Rogers, Co-Chair: Mr. Gary Goeke 199 SESSION 2C: SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC STUDIES - Co-Chairs: Dr. 1-lany H. Luton and Dr. Joanna Endter-Wada 215 SESSION 1E: THE MMS SEA FLOOR MONITORING PROGRAM - Chair: Mr. Nick Wetzel, Co-Chair: Dr. Jack Irion 243 SESSION iF: DE SOTO CANYON - Chair: Dr. Ann Scarborough Bull, Co-Chair: Dr. Tom Mcllwain 275 SESSION 1G: U.S. - MEXICO NATURAL RESOURCES (WITH EMPHASIS ON LAGUNA MADRE) PART I - Co-Chairs: Mr. I-Ioward Ness and Ms. Maria Pia Gallina 313 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page SESSION 2E: PLATFORM ECOLOGY- Chair: Dr. Ann Scarborough Bull, Co-Chair: Dr. Pasquale Roscigno 359 SESSION 2F: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIOECONOMICINFORMATION IN DEEP WATERS OF THE GULF OF MEXICO- Co-Chairs: Dr. Robert M. Avent and Dr. William Schroeder 411 SESSION 2G: U.S.- MEXICO NATURAL RESOURCES (WITH BIVIPHASIS ON LAGTJNA MADRE) PART II Co-Chairs: Mr. Howard Ness and Ms. Maria PiaGallina 425 SESSION 1H: HISTORY AND STATUS OF THE MANTEOPROJECT- Co-Chairs: Mr. Hammond Eve and Ms Kim Crawford 475 SESSION 13: U.S.- MEXICO OFFSHORE ENERGY ISSUES - Chair: Ms. Marvene O'Rourke, Co-Chair: Dr. Alexis Lugo-Fernandez 539 SESSION 1K: GULF OF MEXICO COASTAL ANDMARINE ENVIRONMENTAl. MONITORING, PART I- Chair: Dr. Richard Defenbaugh, Co-Chair: Mr. Joe Penyman 593 SESSION 2H: COASTAL MARINE INSTITUTE, FATE &EFFECTS STUDY: A MINI SYMPOSIUM - Co-Chairs: Dr. Robert Carney and Dr. Pasquale Roscigno 631 SESSION 2K: GULF OF MEXICO COASTAL AND MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, PART II Chair: Dr.Richard Defenbaugh, Co-Chair: Dr. Robert Avent 661 INDEX TO AUTHORS 697 ATTENDEES 701 vii LIST OF FIGURES jQ Page 1 A. 1.Percentage of leases by sale and water depth in CGOM 4 1A.2. Percentage of leases by sale and water depth in WGOM 5 1A.3. Number of DWOP's received by year 9 1A.4.Central Gulf of Mexico leases by water depth 16 1A.5. Western Gulf of Mexico Sales 17 1 A.6. Deepwater development systems 21 lB. 1.Map of the region showing bathymetry, various features, and key locations 42 1B.2. Map of the northeastern Gulf of Mexico showing the boundaries of the study area and ecosystem core regions. Maj or physical exchange paths and forcing mechanisms are indicated schematically 46 1B.3.Labeled satellite image showing Loop Current, possible LC eddy separation, large boundary filament over slope and outer shelf offshore of the Big Bend Area 47 18.4.Locations of final monitoring sites 51 1B.5. Map of mooring positions (solid dots) and standard hydrographic (CTD) stations (open squares) for the Dc Soto Canyon experiment 55 1B.6. Mean 40-HLP current velocities and standard deviation ellipses for (a) 30 rn depth level, and (b) the 200 (solid) and 300 (dashed) rn depth levels, for the indicated period 56 18.7.Surface geostrophic velocities calculated from the hydrographic casts relative to 1000 dbar for (a) the 19- 28 March and (b) 8 - 17 July surveys 57 1 C. 1. Estuarine distribution and relative abundance ofjuvenile red drum in North Carolina during the high salinity period 73 1 C.2.Example HS Modeling Process for Eastern Oyster in Pensacola Bay, Florida 74 1D.1. Graph for well test 34.9 miles from land 98 LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Nc Page 1D.2. OCD Main Menu 102 1D.3.Input Menu screen 102 1D.4. Model Domain screen. The user needs to specify two latitudes and two longitudes that define the model domain, and the grid resolution for the model domain 103 1D.5. Map Display of the shoreline geometry, sources (with an "S" prefix), and receptors (with an "R" prefix) 103 1D.6.Output Options screen, where output options are logically grouped 104 1D.7. PEAK screen for the ANALYSIS postprocessor 105 1 D .8.Exceedance Map screen, where all predicted concentration values exceeding a user-specified value are displayed. The sources, labeled as Si, S2, etc., are also displayed 105 1D.9. Time series for two 502 events observed at Breton Island 110 1D.10. Time series for two NO2 events observed at Breton Island 111 1D.1 1. Backward trajectories estimated for two high 502 events observed at Breton Island in November 1994 (top) and February 1995 (bottom). Circle indicates approximately 75-mile radius from Breton 112 1D.12. Backward trajectories estimated for two high NO2 events observed at Breton Island in May 1995 (top) and October 1996 (bottom). Circle indicates approximately 75-mile radius from l3reton 113 1D.13. NOAA Daily Weather Map Series for two high SO2 events observed at Breton Island in November 1994 (top) and February 1995 (bottom). Image time is 0700 EST 114 1.14. NOAA Daily Weather Map Series for two high NO7 events observed at Breton Island in May 1995 (top) and October 1996 (bottom). Image time is 0700 EST 115 ix LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Page 1D. 15. Nested 108/36/12/4 Km MM5 Meteorological Modeling Domain used with the 6-11 September 1993 and 15-19 August 1993 GMAQS episodes to optimize the placement of meteorological sensors for the Breton Aerometric Monitoring Program 121 1D.16. Surface MM5 wind predictions and observations (bold vectors) on the 36 Km grid on 18 August 1993 at 1900 EST 122 1D.17. Surface MM5 wind predictions arid observations (bold vectors) on the 12 Km grid on 18 August 1193 at 1900 EST 123 2A. 1.The seismic industry will continue to increase the amount of in-sea equipment for the acquisition of 3D seismic surveys 131 2A.2. The multi-3D concept configuration 132 2A.3. The marine vibrator 132 2A.4. The vibrator has greater stability and repeatability than the airgun 133 2A.5. Water and oil movement at three different times in the life of the reservoir 133 2A.6. 3D time-lapse monitoring illustrated through the use of synthetic data 134 2A.7. North Sea 3D seismic surveys 134 2A.8.Vertical and seafloor cables provide true 3D seismic data 136 2A.9. Data comparison indicating the improved resolution and greater continuity in events delivered by the seabed cable systems 137 2A.10. An example of imaging beneath gas using S-wave energy 139 2A. 11. Refraction of one type of wave due to the roughness of the salt surface will create uneven illumination of reflectors beneath the salt 140 2A.12. A 4 -component seismic seabed cable 140 2A.13. An illustration of how a 4-component seismic operation might be laid out 141 x LIST OF FIGURES (continued) Nc Page 2A.14. Current costs of seabed cable surveys 141 2A.15. ADS Capabilities 144 2A.16. Umbilical Termination Assembly (UTA) during installation 145 2A.17. Subsea template 146 2A. 18. Integration testing 147 2A.19. Hydra AT 148 2A.20. Magellan 725 149 2A.21. Auger Triton 150 2A.22. Scorpio 5000 151 2A.23. Deepwater development options: dry trees 165 2A.24. Deepwater development options: subsea trees 166 2A.25. Progression of deepwater developments 167 2A.26. Deepwater developments distribution by development type (1982-2000) 168 2A.27. Deepwater development regional distribution (1982-2000) 169 2A.28. Key field development selection drivers 170 2A.29. Why deepwater field development are attractive 171 2A.30.