Copyright Rebecca Lynn Minzoni 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyright Rebecca Lynn Minzoni 2015 Copyright Rebecca Lynn Minzoni 2015 ABSTRACT The Antarctic Peninsula’s Response to Holocene Climate Variability: Controls on Glacial Stability and Implications for Future Change By Rebecca Lynn Minzoni The Antarctic Peninsula is one of the most rapidly changing regions in the cryosphere, with 87% of its glaciers receding and several ice shelves catastrophically collapsing since observations began in the 1960’s. These substantial, well-documented changes in the ice landscape have caused concern for the mass balance of the Antarctic Peninsula Ice Cap. To better understand the significance of these recent changes, I have assimilated a massive database of new and published marine sedimentary records spanning the Holocene Epoch (the last 11.5 kyrs). The database includes 9 coastal embayments with expanded sedimentary packages and well-dated cores. Each site represents an end-member in the wide range of Antarctic Peninsula oceanography, orography, meteorology, and glacial drainage basin characteristics. Multi-proxy analysis, including sedimentology, geochemistry, and micropaleontology, was conducted at each site to reconstruct glacial history at centennial-scale resolution, on par with ice-core data. The coastal sites were then compared in the context of published ice-core paleoclimate, paleoceanographic, and glaciological records. The first of these sites, Herbert Sound, provides an unparalleled opportunity to compare the marine sediment record with a related ice-core in an Antarctic maritime setting. Herbert Sound is the southernmost embayment studied on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula and represents an end-member with a cold, dry atmosphere and cold, saline ocean mass. The record from Herbert Sound indicates grounded ice receded quickly and early in the Holocene, followed by a floating ice phase that collapsed 10 2.4 calendar kyrs before present (cal kyr BP, where present day is 1950 A.D.) and never re-advanced. The fjord remained open and productive during the prolonged warm intervals of the Mid Holocene, and began to experience greater glacial influence and sea ice cover during Late Holocene cooling, a period termed the Neoglacial. The second site, Ferrero Bay of the Amundsen Sea, is the southernmost end-member on the western side of the Antarctic Peninsula and represents a truly polar coastal setting. Grounded ice receded from the deep basin much earlier than expected, ~10.7 cal kyr BP, likely due to advecting water masses that under-melted the extended ice sheet. Ferrero Bay was then covered by the extensive Cosgrove Ice Shelf, which remained stable during the Mid Holocene Hypsithermal despite incursion of warm water, and did not recede to its current position until 2.0 cal kyr BP, coincident with Neoglacial cooling. Thus, Ferrero Bay and the Cosgrove Ice Shelf were out of phase with the northern peninsula sites and apparently were not sensitive to Holocene climate variability but rather to impinging warm ocean currents, which are observed in Ferrero Bay today. Comparison of 9 coastal sites, including Herbert Sound, Ferrero Bay, and several other embayments of various local settings, shows highly variable glacial response to Early Holocene warming, with difference in onset of 4.2 kyrs and difference in duration of 2.5 kyrs. The Mid Holocene more synchronous, with a difference in the onset of 1.7 kyrs and a difference in duration of 1.9 kyrs. The Late Holocene Neoglacial by contrast was highly synchronous with difference in onset and duration of 0.7 kyrs and 0.7 kyrs, respectively. Later historic events of shorter duration, such as the Little Ice Age, were more synchronous with difference in onset and duration of 0.3 kyrs and 0.2 kyrs, respectively. Regional glacial behavior became more synchronous during the Holocene as the glaciers and their drainage basins became progressively smaller, rendering them more sensitive to climate change and less influenced by local forcings such as ocean temperature, basin bathymetry, and precipitation effects. This increase in glacier sensitivity helps explain the current widespread glacial recession in response to the rapid regional warming of ~3.5 C over the last century. Acknowledgments First and foremost I am grateful to Dr. John Anderson for the numerous opportunities and challenges he has given me during this PhD. The research included in this dissertation was shaped by several enriching experiences that John facilitated, including my attendance to workshops around the globe to learn new skills, namely diatom micropaleontology. It takes a truly altruistic advisor to allow a student to pursue what might be considered tertiary interests to a project. John had the confidence in me to bring these various pursuits together into a holistic, large-scale analysis; fortunately, these external pursuits became the key proxies for our interpretations. I could not dream of a more exciting and fulfilling PhD experience. Thank you, John, for believing in me, for investing in me, and for growing me into a more confident and mature scientist. I thank my committee members for investing countless hours and resources into my professional development. Thank you, Dr. André Droxler, for being a reliable sounding board for ideas, for allowing me to use your lab space with an open door policy, and for being an excellent teacher in the classroom and in the field. Thank you, Dr. Jeffrey Nittrouer, for constructive feedback and lively lab discussions. Thank you, Dr. Volker Rudolf, for serving as a mentor who truly has students’ best interest in mind. I would like to especially thank Dr. Julia Wellner, who acted as a committee member in every sense of the word. Julia, you have been an excellent co- author, friend, and role model to me. I appreciate you incorporating me into your lab group at UH and facilitating collaboration and progressive thinking in our research. I also thank Dr. Amy Leventer (Colgate) who has been an exceptionally generous mentor to me in diatomology and in Antarctic field science, and a key supporter in my pursuit of micropaleontology. Thank you for connecting me with the welcoming community of the Polar Marine Diatom Workshops and teaching me skills that were essential to this research. v Thank you to my ever-supportive, high-spirited co-authors, Dr. Rodrigo Fernandez, Dr. Wojciech Majewski, Dr. Yusuke Yokoyama, and Dr. Martin Jakobsson. This research builds upon three decades of hard work at sea in harsh conditions, as well as countless hours in the laboratory by dedicated scientists and technicians. I thank the crews of Oden Southern Ocean Cruise 09-10, Nathaniel B. Palmer cruises 05-02 and 07-03, Polar Duke 1990 and 1991, and Deep Freeze (USCG Glacier) 1982. Thank you to Dr. Charlotte Sjunneskog and Steve Petrushak for their assistance with sampling and data collection at the Antarctic Research Facility. Thank you to Dr. Tony Gary and TACSWorks for teaching me Fuzzy C-Means analysis and graciously allowing me to use their software for this project. Thank you to Dr. Caroline Masiello for allowing me to use her lab and advising me on geochemical methods. This work was completed with funding from the National Science Foundation Award OPP99-09734 to John B. Anderson and Julia S. Wellner, and OPP0837925 to John B. Anderson. This research was also facilitated by the Douglas and Martha Lou Broussard Fellowship and travel grants from Rice University, the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research, PAGES, and the International Symposium of Antarctic Earth Science through NSF. Martha Lou Broussard, you have created a legacy for students of the Earth Science Department that constantly inspires me; you are the model example of how alumni should give back to the community that shaped them. Thank you. I am exceptionally grateful to Dr. Luis González (KU), the late Dr. Larry Martin (KU), and Dr. Kraig Derstler (UNO) for their openhanded, enthusiastic mentorship and for their belief in my early dreams of pursuing the noble, ever-evolving path of a research scientist. I am especially grateful to Ruthie Halberstadt, Catherine Ross, Victoria Yuan, Kelsey Crocker, and Savannah Ezelle for working with me in the lab and for their unbridled enthusiasm, which served as motivation for me during PhD doldrums. The support of my peers has been essential to my progress at Rice. Thank you Dr. Lauren Simkins, Lindsay Prothro, Yuribia Munoz, Brian Demet, Dr. Davin vi Wallace, Travis Stolldorf, Karem Lopez, Dr. Lizette Leon-Rodriguez, Svetlana Burris, Dr. Xiaodong Gao, Krystle Hodge, Stacy Dwyer, Sarah Huff, Lily Seidman, Kaitlyn Moran, Tian Dong, Laura Carter, Jen Gabler, Dr. Lester King, Shibu Mathukutty, Ayca Agar Cetin, Dr. Brandon Harper, Clint Miller, Dr. Ananya Malik, Dr. Pranabendu Moitra, Dr. Matt Weller, Jacob Seigel, Dr. Ben Slotnik, and Pankaj Khanna. Many heart-felt thanks to the gracious ESCI administrators who were always available and encouraging to me, despite their busy schedules: Mary Ann Lebar, Soookie Sanchez, Sandra Flechsig, Roger Romero, Pat Jordan, and Lee Wilson. I also thank Dr. Malcolm Ross, Dr. Albert Bally, Dr. Steve Bergman, and Dr. James Eldrett for their mentorship and support at Shell and beyond. Much like a healthy carbonate platform, my family has been the framework upon which my academic life was able to grow and mature. Thank you, Dr. Marcello Minzoni, my brilliant and ardent husband, who served in the trenches, picking up the slack at home when I needed to put extra hours into my research, and ultimately for understanding the joy and the challenge of completing a PhD. Thank you for being a loving, involved father to our beautiful boys and for consistently helping me see the big picture of what is most important in life. I thank my supportive siblings, Nate, Louise, Matt, Cody, and Wyatt, for their interest in my research, and for always understanding when I missed events due to field excursions and writing deadlines. I also thank Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula Author(S): Rodney M
    Paleontological Society Late Cretaceous and Paleocene Decapod Crustaceans from James Ross Basin, Antarctic Peninsula Author(s): Rodney M. Feldmann, Dale M. Tshudy, Michael R. A. Thomson Source: Memoir (The Paleontological Society), Vol. 28, Supplement to Vol. 67, no. 1 of the Journal of Paleontology (Jan., 1993), pp. 1-41 Published by: Paleontological Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1315582 Accessed: 16/01/2009 20:00 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=paleo. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Paleontological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Memoir (The Paleontological Society).
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Map of James Ross Island
    58°30'W 58°00' 57°30' 57°00'W Ė Ė 500 500 100 200 500 Cape Lachman 200 OUTCROP MAP Cape LONG 11 12 2.03 ± 0.04(2) 28 30 fs Well-met ISLAND 34 Vertigo Clif 1:125 000 Scale 3 P [1.27 ± 0.08(1)] Gregor Mendel 5.16 ± 0.83(5) 29 L L F Keltie Head L DEVIL ISLAND Station (Czech) 5.67 ± 0.03(6) 7 F 28 29 7 [recalculated 27 A 3 ? weighted mean L 7 L 4 LINE OF CROSS SECTION age] L Bibby 2 ? 0.99 ± 0.05(2) F 2.67 ± 0.13(2) 12 5 3 29 Point 20 14 F 28 L 29 L 4 L Geological Map of James Ross Island 30 8 L 15 5 18 ? L L 12 5.23 ± 0.57(1) 26 L 15 L L 7 3 5.32 ± 0.16(2) Berry Hill 8 L 11 30 38 15 15 L 1 ? 25 L 3 L 10 Johnson L 4 500 L 11 L 26 Sandwich 1. James Ross Island Volcanic Group San Carlos Mesa L Pirrie Col 30 Bengtson Clif 500 Point L 1 Bluff L L Cape Gordon 25 L 5.04 ± 0.04(2) 5.42 ± 0.08(2) L L Brandy Bay 7 ? L L 8 29 F 4.63 ± 0.57(1) 27 L 7 4 8 VEGA ISLAND 4.6 ± 0.4(4) 27 15 L 12 fs L 500 L BAS GEOMAP 2 Series, Sheet 5, Edition 1 F 3 L 27 29 Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula James Ross Island Antarctica.Pdf
    Journal of Maps ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjom20 Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica Stephen J. A. Jennings, Bethan J. Davies, Daniel Nývlt, Neil F. Glasser, Zbyněk Engel, Filip Hrbáček, Jonathan L. Carrivick, Bedřich Mlčoch & Michael J. Hambrey To cite this article: Stephen J. A. Jennings, Bethan J. Davies, Daniel Nývlt, Neil F. Glasser, Zbyněk Engel, Filip Hrbáček, Jonathan L. Carrivick, Bedřich Mlčoch & Michael J. Hambrey (2021) Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica, Journal of Maps, 17:2, 125-139, DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2021.1893232 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1893232 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa View supplementary material UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Journal of Maps Published online: 08 Mar 2021. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 135 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjom20 JOURNAL OF MAPS 2021, VOL. 17, NO. 2, 125–139 https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1893232 SCIENCE Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica Stephen J. A. Jennings a, Bethan J. Davies b, Daniel Nývlt a,c, Neil F. Glasser d, Zbyněk Engel e, Filip Hrbáček a, Jonathan L. Carrivick f, Bedřich Mlčochc and Michael J. Hambrey d aPolar-Geo-Lab, Department of Geography, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic;
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica
    Aberystwyth University Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica Jennings, Stephen J.A.; Davies, Bethan J.; Nývlt, Daniel; Glasser, Neil F.; Engel, Zbynk; Hrbáek, Filip; Carrivick, Jonathan L.; Mloch, Bedich; Hambrey, Michael J. Published in: Journal of Maps DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2021.1893232 Publication date: 2021 Citation for published version (APA): Jennings, S. J. A., Davies, B. J., Nývlt, D., Glasser, N. F., Engel, Z., Hrbáek, F., Carrivick, J. L., Mloch, B., & Hambrey, M. J. (2021). Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica. Journal of Maps, 17(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2021.1893232 Document License CC BY General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 Journal of Maps ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjom20 Geomorphology of Ulu Peninsula, James Ross Island, Antarctica Stephen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of the Antarctic
    NOIJ.VQNn OJ3ON3133^1 VNOI±VN r o CO ] ] Q) 1 £Q> : 0) >J N , CO O The National Science Foundation has TDD (Telephonic Device for the Deaf) capability, which enables individuals with hearing impairment to communicate with the Division of Personnel and Management about NSF programs, employment, or general information. This number is (202) 357-7492. GAZETTEER OF THE ANTARCTIC Fourth Edition names approved by the UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES a cooperative project of the DEFENSE MAPPING AGENCY Hydrographic/Topographic Center Washington, D. C. 20315 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY National Mapping Division Reston, Virginia 22092 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION Division of Polar Programs Washington, D. C. 20550 1989 STOCK NO. GAZGNANTARCS UNITED STATES BOARD ON GEOGRAPHIC NAMES Rupert B. Southard, Chairman Ralph E. Ehrenberg, Vice Chairman Richard R. Randall, Executive Secretary Department of Agriculture .................................................... Sterling J. Wilcox, member Donald D. Loff, deputy Anne Griesemer, deputy Department of Commerce .................................................... Charles E. Harrington, member Richard L. Forstall, deputy Henry Tom, deputy Edward L. Gates, Jr., deputy Department of Defense ....................................................... Thomas K. Coghlan, member Carl Nelius, deputy Lois Winneberger, deputy Department of the Interior .................................................... Rupert B. Southard, member Tracy A. Fortmann, deputy David E. Meier, deputy Joel L. Morrison, deputy Department
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Glacier Behavior Around the Northern Antarctic Peninsula and Possible Causes
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 534 (2020) 116077 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl Holocene glacier behavior around the northern Antarctic Peninsula and possible causes M.R. Kaplan a,∗, J.A. Strelin b,c, J.M. Schaefer a,d, C. Peltier a,d, M.A. Martini c,e,f, E. Flores c, G. Winckler a,d, R. Schwartz a a Geochemistry, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, NY 10964, USA b Instituto Antártico Argentino, Argentina c Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Tierra (CICTERRA, CONICET-Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, UNC), Córdoba, Argentina d Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA e Núcleo Milenio Paleoclima, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile f Instituto de Geografía, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We obtained 49 new 10Be ages that document the activity of the former Northern Antarctic Peninsula Received 19 September 2019 Ice Sheet, and subsequently the James Ross Island Ice Cap and nearby glaciers, from the end of the last Received in revised form 21 December 2019 glacial period until the last ∼100 years. The data indicate that from >11 to ∼8 ka marked recession Accepted 6 January 2020 of glacier systems occurred around James Ross Island, including tidewater and local land-terminating Available online xxxx glaciers. Glaciers reached heads of bays and fjords by 8-7 ka. Subsequently, local glaciers were larger Editor: L.
    [Show full text]
  • COMPOSITE GAZETTEER of ANTARCTICA (CGA) Draft Of
    Draft July 2002 Letter “A” only COMPOSITE GAZETTEER OF ANTARCTICA (CGA) Draft of Volume 2, letter A only Shanghai, July 2002 1 . 2 INTRODUCTION From 1998 to 2000 At the meeting of the WG on Geodesy and Geographic Information held in Concepción, Chile, July 1998, the first edition of the SCAR Composite Gazetteer of Antarctica (CGA) was presented and discussed. As a consequence of the discussion, the WG decided the upgrading of the CGA in order to include in future editions the dates of approval of names and the descriptions of the geographical features. All Member Countries were asked to send their contributions to the Italian team charged with the new task. An additional requirement, mainly addressed to those Countries that had already got the required supplementary information in their Gazetteers, was that the descriptions should be shortened in order to not exceed, on the average, 300 characters. The request was issued on 15 June 1999. At the meeting of the WG Program Leaders held in Heppenheim, Germany, July 1999, the difficulties of assembling a large amount of data in a comparatively short time appeared quite evident. It was decided, accordingly, that only the geographical names beginning with the letter "A" should be taken into consideration at the present stage. During the two year span between Concepción meeting (1998) and Tokyo meeting (2000) the work on the CGA went on along two lines: on the one side, dates of approval and descriptions were added to existing names; on the other side, new names were collected and included in the CGA, those new names coming most often complete with dates and descriptions.
    [Show full text]