Automation Interface Between Flight Information Regions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Automation Interface Between Flight Information Regions civil air navigation services organisation Automation Interface Between Flight Information Regions Best Practice Guide for ANSPs Acknowledgements This publication was produced by the Flight Information Region Boundary Crossing Task Force of CANSO’s Operations Standing Committee. CANSO would like to thank Jorge Chades, Federal Aviation Administration, Ajay Joshi, Airports Authority of India; Rick Taylor and Dirk Hunter, Airservices Australia; Kapri Kupper, CANSO; Dan Eaves and Vincent McMenamy, Federal Aviation Administration; Carole Stewart, NAV CANADA; Craig Roberts, Thales; and Ashley Lalman, Trinidad and Tobago Civil Aviation Authority. We also acknowledge the valuable contributions by other CANSO Members and Embry Riddle Aeronautical University. © Copyright CANSO 2016 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted in any form, without the prior permission of CANSO. This paper is for information purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure the quality and accuracy of information in this publication, it is made available without any warranty of any kind. canso.org Published June 2016 Contents 3 Acknowledgements_______________________________________________________________________page 2 Executive Summary______________________________________________________________________page 4 Introduction______________________________________________________________________________page 5 1 Safety and Efficiency Benefits from Automated Data Exchange___________________________page 6 1.1 Steps Involved in Manual Coordination ________________________________________________page 7 2 Relationship to ICAO ASBU Framework _________________________________________________page 10 3 Implementation Opportunities _________________________________________________________page 12 3.1 Increasing Safety through Accurate Flight Plan Information _______________________________page 12 3.2 Changing the ATS in the FIR Boundary Area ____________________________________________page 12 3.3 Making Changes to the Flight Data Processing System __________________________________page 12 4 Interface Options and Considerations ___________________________________________________page 13 4.1 Overview _________________________________________________________________________page 13 4.1.1 AIDC Automation Benefits ______________________________________________________page 14 4.2 Automated Interface and Protocols ___________________________________________________page 14 4.2.1 AIDC __________________________________________________________________________page 14 4.2.1.1 AIDC in Airservices Australia’s Airspace __________________________________________page 16 4.2.2 OLDI ________________________________________________________________________page 17 4.2.3 NAM-ICD ___________________________________________________________________ page 18 4.3 Mixed Environments _______________________________________________________________page 19 4.4 Considerations ____________________________________________________________________page 20 4.5 CPDLC and ADS-C Operations ______________________________________________________page 21 5 Implementation Planning _______________________________________________________________page 24 5.1 Interface/System Implementation Planning ____________________________________________page 24 5.2 Stakeholders ______________________________________________________________________page 25 5.3 Gap Analysis ______________________________________________________________________page 26 5.4 Task Analysis ______________________________________________________________________page 26 5.5 System Requirements ______________________________________________________________page 27 5.6 Standards _________________________________________________________________________page 28 5.7 Assessing Possible Solutions _________________________________________________________page 29 5.8 Implementation Lessons Learned ____________________________________________________page 30 5.9 Adaptability _______________________________________________________________________page 31 6 Related Considerations ________________________________________________________________page 33 6.1 Safety Management_________________________________________________________________page 33 6.1.1 Recommended Action Plan ______________________________________________________page 33 6.2 Contingency Procedures ____________________________________________________________page 34 6.3 Opportunities for ATS Enhancements _________________________________________________page 34 6.4 Inter-Unit Agreements ______________________________________________________________page 34 7 Conclusions and Recommendations _____________________________________________________page 36 References ______________________________________________________________________________page 37 Appendices ________________________________________________________________________________page 38 Acronyms ________________________________________________________________________________page 52 4 Automation Interface Between Flight Information Regions Best Practice Guide for ANSPs Executive Summary CANSO Member ANSPs identified that critical implications for both safety and efficiency. safety and efficiency in crossing flight information ANSPs that coordinate flight data manually should region (FIR) boundaries are hindered by disparities consider concurrently implementing automated in separation standards; procedures in filing data exchange (ADE) with neighbouring ANSPs to flight-plans; air traffic flow management (ATFM) achieve the benefits derived from automated cross measures; pilot-to-controller and controller- boundary air traffic operations. to-controller communication capabilities; incompatibilities between adjacent automation As ANSPs gain experience, they should platforms; and inconsistent airspace structures. share knowledge and lessons learned to move toward a safer, technologically and procedurally This CANSO Automation Interface Between interoperable ATM system that delivers a truly Flight Information Regions: Best Practice Guide seamless airspace. for ANSPs recommends establishing best practices that will provide a basic framework for achieving a technically and procedurally interoperable system as it relates to airspace users transitioning between FIRs. This Guide will assist individual ANSPs to collaborate with neighbouring ANSPs and stakeholders to identify where non-compatible automation platforms exist, enhance existing cross boundary interfaces, and support interoperability and complementary implementations. The automated exchange of flight data contributes to safe and efficient FIR boundary crossing operations. This Guide will help ANSPs facilitate the reduction or elimination of factors that contribute to operational inefficiencies such as read-back / hear-back errors, missed coordination and flight progress updates. It will significantly reduce the amount of manual coordination required by ATCOs for aircraft to cross FIR boundaries seamlessly. Automated data exchange is integral to achieving all of the benefits foreseen in the ICAO ASBU FICE (Flight and Flow Information for a Collaborative Environment) Modules. The recommendations are aligned with and complement guidance material provided by ICAO. Creating and instituting seamless FIR boundary crossings is an important task with 5 Introduction The Guide is intended to help ANSPs The Civil Air Navigation Services facilitate the reduction, or elimination, of factors Organisation (CANSO) vision is to transform air that contribute to operational inefficiencies, traffic management (ATM) performance globally and the loss of required separation standards as by creating seamless airspace worldwide. A key aircraft cross FIR boundaries. The Guide focuses objective of this vision is the harmonisation of on improving the coordination of flight plan airspace to enable seamless navigation across the data across FIR boundaries by establishing best globe. The purpose of this CANSO Guide, as well as practices that will help ANSPs use automated the Guide to Seamless Airspace (2013), and the Best methods. It covers the benefits and the Practice Guide to Crossing Flight Information Region relationship of this process to the International Boundaries (2015), is to assist air navigation service Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Aviation providers (ANSP) deliver services seamlessly across System Block Upgrades (ASBU) framework. It also flight information region (FIR) boundaries. outlines opportunities for interfacing, modifying, or enhancing existing automation systems in CANSO has identified that efficiency in an effort to improve the automated exchange crossing FIR boundaries is currently impacted by of flight plan data between neighbouring disparities in: separation standards, procedures ATSUs. The document provides examples in filing flight-plans, air traffic flow management of varying interface options, and associated (ATFM) measures, pilot-to-controller and controller- benefits derived, such as those implemented to-controller communication capabilities, lack of successfully in Europe, North America, and Asia automated connectivity between adjacent ANSP Pacific. Additionally, it covers guidance and facilities, and inconsistent airspace configurations recommendations on implementation planning and designations. and related considerations, which will help ANSPs identify the necessary steps for successful This Guide addresses disparities and, in automation interface, and develop
Recommended publications
  • Airservices Australia Annual Report 2000 - 2001 Has Been Prepared in Accordance with Those Requirements and the Finance Minister’S Orders
    Safety Service Staff ANNUAL REPORT 2000 – 2001 AIRSERVICES AUSTRALIA AIRSERVICES AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 2000 – 2001 Airservices Australia ANNUAL REPORT 2001 i © Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISSN –1327-6980 This work is copyright. Apart from any use under the Copyright Act 1968 no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Airservices Australia. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be addressed to the: Manager, Corporate Communication, Airservices Australia, GPO Box 367, Canberra City, ACT 2601. Telephone: (02) 6268 4111; Fax: (02) 6268 5688. Produced by Finance & Corporate Services Group and Marketing. Printed by Robey Pty Ltd. Airservices Australia ANNUAL REPORT 2001 ii Table of Contents Letter of transmittal . v Introduction . 1 Annual reporting requirements . 1 Powers and functions. 1 Directorship and governance. 2 Responsible Minister . 3 Structure . 3 Chairman’s year in review . 5 Corporate profile . 7 Report from the Chief Executive. 8 Year’s highlights. 10 The Corporate Scorecard . 13 Operational performance . 13 Financial Performance . 17 Vision and Corporate Objectives. 19 Report of Operations . 21 Key result area: Safety . 21 Key result area: Environment. 22 Key result area: Operational excellence. 24 Key result area: Customers and markets. 26 Key result area: Employees . 28 Key result area: Owner . 29 Financial Statements . 31 Appendices. 63 Appendix 1 – Board . 64 Appendix 2 – Board biographies . 67 Appendix 3 – 2000-01 Project summaries . 70 Appendix 4 – Ministerial Directions and Charter Letter . 75 Appendix 5 – Staff resources and statutory information . 94 Appendix 6 – Judicial decisions and reviews by outside bodies . 108 Appendix 7 – Indemnities and insurance premiums for officers . 109 Appendix 8 – Noise complaints (telephoned) .
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 –19 C Orporate P
    2018–19 Corporate Plan The plan is presented for tabling in both Houses of Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. ISSN 1325-2755 (print) 2207-5925 (online) © Airservices Australia 2018 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Airservices Australia. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be addressed to: Enterprise Analysis and Reporting Manager Airservices Australia GPO Box 367 Canberra City ACT 2601 Telephone (02) 6268 4374 Fax (02) 6268 4233 Web address of this report: www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/corporate-publications/ strategic-planning Contents Letter from the Chair 2 Our purpose 4 Plan on a page 5 Outlook 7 Strategic pillars and enterprise initiatives 14 Performance 30 Five-year corporate financial plan 34 Risk oversight and management 37 Appendix A: The Board’s Statement of Intent 42 Appendix B: Ministerial Directions 49 List of acronyms 50 Corporate Plan Corporate 2018–19 Letter from the Chair 2 I, Air Chief Marshal Sir Angus Houston AK, AFC (Ret’d), as Chair of Airservices Australia, present the Airservices Australia 2018–19 Corporate Plan, which covers the periods of 2018–19 to 2022–23, as required under section 35(1) (b) of the Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013 and Section 13 of the Air Services Act 1995. I am pleased to present the Airservices Building on the significant work done 2018–19 Corporate Plan. This Plan has internally on our business fundamentals particular significance for me as it is my last in 2017–18—with a new operating model, as Chair of Airservices Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Document De Référence 2017 Thales
    www.thalesgroup.com Document de référence 2017 Incluant le rapport financier annuel SOMMAIRE MESSAGE DU PRÉSIDENT 2 PRÉSENTATION DU GROUPE 3 CHIFFRES CLÉS ET HISTORIQUE 4 1. ÉLÉMENTS FINANCIERS 2017 6 1.1 Rapport de gestion 8 1.2 Comptes consolidés 35 1.3 Rapport de gestion et comptes de la société mère 84 2. ACTIVITÉS 120 2.1 Secteurs opérationnels 122 2.2 Recherche et innovation 130 2.3 Relations entre Thales et ses filiales 133 2.4 Données sur les principales filiales opérationnelles et principaux sites industriels 135 3. GOUVERNEMENT D’ENTREPRISE 138 3.1 Composition du Conseil d’administration au 31 décembre 2017 140 3.2 Rapport du Conseil d’administration à l’assemblée générale du 17 mai 2018 sur le gouvernement d’entreprise 148 3.3 Direction générale et Comité exécutif 168 3.4 Rémunération des autres dirigeants 169 3.5 Intéressement et participation 172 3.6 Commissaires aux comptes 173 4. SOCIÉTÉ ET CAPITAL 174 4.1 Renseignements de caractère général sur la Société 176 4.2 Capital et actionnariat 177 4.3 Conventions réglementées 189 4.4 Informations boursières et communication financière 193 5. RESPONSABILITÉ D’ENTREPRISE 198 5.1 Informations sociales 200 5.2 Informations environnementales 217 5.3 Informations sociétales 231 5.4 Rapport de l’organisme tiers indépendant, sur les informations sociales, environnementales et sociétales consolidées figurant dans le rapport de gestion 240 5.5 Table de concordance (articles L. 225-102-1 et R. 225-105-1 du code de commerce) 242 ATTESTATION DU RESPONSABLE DU DOCUMENT DE RÉFÉRENCE 245 TABLE DE CONCORDANCE (ANNEXE 1 DU RÈGLEMENT EUROPÉEN N° 809/2004) 246 MODIFICATIONS OPÉRÉES DANS LA STRUCTURE DU DOCUMENT DE RÉFÉRENCE 2017 250 TABLE DE RÉCONCILIATION DU RAPPORT FINANCIER ANNUEL 251 DOCUMENT DE RÉFÉRENCE 2017 INCLUANT LE RAPPORT FINANCIER ANNUEL Le document de référence a été déposé auprès de l’Autorité des marchés financiers le 30 mars 2018 conformément à l’article 212- 13 de son règlement général.
    [Show full text]
  • European Route Network Improvement Plan
    EUROCONTROL European Route Network Improvement Plan PART 2 European ATS Route Network - Version 2020-2024 Edition July 2020 Approved by the Network Mangement Board 8 July 2020 FOUNDING MEMBER NETWORK SUPPORTING EUROPEAN AVIATION MANAGER EUROCONTROL Network Management Directorate DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Title ERNIP Part 2 Document Subtitle European ATS Route Network - Version 2020 - 2024 Document Reference ERNIPPART2 Edition Number 1.0 Edition Validity Date 08-07-2020 Classification White Status Final Author(s) NMD/ACD Contact Person(s) Razvan Bucuroiu APPROVAL TABLE Authority Date Signature Prepared by: 14 Apr 2020 NMD/ACD Reviewed and endorsed by: 28 April 2020 RNDSG/100 Reviewed and endorsed by: 15 May 2020 NETOPS/27 Reviewed and endorsed by: 02 June 2020 NDOP/26 Approved by: 08 July 2020 NMB/28 Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Validity Date: 08-07-2020 Classification: White Page: i EUROCONTROL Network Management Directorate EDITION HISTORY Edition No. Validity Date Author(s) Reason 0.1 28 Apr 2020 NMD/ACD Proposed Issue RNDSG/100 Proposed Issue NETOPS/27 and 0.2 04 May 2020 NMD/ACD NDOP/26 0.3 02 June 2020 NMD/ACD Proposed Issue to NMB/28 1.0 08 July 2020 NMD/ACD Approved by NMB/28 Edition Number: 1.0 Edition Validity Date: 08-07-2020 Classification: White Page: ii EUROCONTROL Network Management Directorate TABLE OF CONTENT DOCUMENT CONTROL ................................................................................................... I APPROVAL TABLE ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2015–16 Annual Report
    2015–16 Annual Report © Airservices Australia 2016 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from Airservices Australia. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be addressed to: Communication Services Manager Airservices Australia GPO Box 367 Canberra City ACT 2601 Telephone (02) 6268 4867 Fax (02) 6268 5688 [email protected] www.airservicesaustralia.com ABN 59 698 720 886 Web address of this report: www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/corporate-publications ISSN 1327-6980 (Print) ISSN 2205-2887 (Online) Produced by Airservices Australia II Airservices 2015–16 Annual Report Contents Letter of transmittal V Chair’s report VI Chief Executive Officer’s report VIII Corporate overview 10 Purpose 11 Strategic direction 12 Corporate governance 13 Our financial performance 18 Annual performance statement 22 Maximising safety performance 24 High performing organisation 28 Core operational and business excellence 32 Financial statements 44 Appendices 90 Appendix 1: Board memberships, meetings and committees 97 Appendix 2: Statement of Expectations and Statement of Intent 98 Appendix 3: Report against performance initiatives 104 Appendix 4: Statutory and administrative information 111 Appendix 5: Staff equity and diversity progress report 118 Appendix 6: Workforce plan progress report 125 Appendix 7: Ecologically sustainable development (ESD) report 128 Appendix 8: Noise complaints and information service data 130 Appendix 9: Aircraft Noise Ombudsman Annual Report 131 Glossary 157 Compliance index 158 Index 160 Airservices 2015–16 Annual Report III IV Airservices 2015–16 Annual Report Letter of transmittal Chair GPO Box 367, Canberra ACT 2601 25 Constitution Avenue, Canberra ACT 2601 t 02 6268 4859 f 02 6268 5686 The Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019–20 Corporate Plan 2019–20 Corporate Plan Corporate 2019–20
    2019–20 Corporate Plan 2019–20 Corporate Plan Corporate 2019–20 Publication Details Digital Access Published by Airservices Australia. Online access is available at www.airservicesaustralia.com/publications/ © Airservices Australia 2019 corporate-publications/strategic-planning PUB 001—Airservices Australia Corporate Plan 2019–20 Publication Contact ISSN 1325-2755 (hard copy/print) Enquiries concerning reproduction rights should ISSN 2207-5925 (online) be addressed to: ABN 59 698 720 886 Enterprise Analysis and Reporting Manager Airservices Australia This plan was presented for tabling in both GPO Box 367 Houses of Parliament of the Commonwealth Canberra City ACT 2601 of Australia. Telephone (02) 6268 4374 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as Fax (02) 6268 4233 permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part [email protected] may be reproduced by any process without prior www.airservicesaustralia.com written permission from Airservices Australia. Publication Acknowledgements Graphic design—Impress Design Print publication—Instant Colour Press Contents 1 1 Letter from the Chairman 2 2 Outlook 8 3 Our Purpose 12 4 Plan Corporate 2019–20 Strategic Pillars 13 5 Performance 28 6 Five-year Corporate Financial Plan 30 7 Risk Oversight and Management 34 Appendix A: Ministerial Expectations 37 1 Letter from the Chairman 2 I am proud to present the Airservices 2019–20 Corporate Plan, 2019–20 Corporate Plan Corporate 2019–20 my first as Chairman of Airservices Australia. I consider it a great honour to chair this organisation as we move towards a different future for both Airservices and Australia’s aviation industry. Air traffic continues to grow, with Australia’s capital cities forecast to more than double their conventional aircraft movements over the coming two decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Airline Representatives of Australia (BARA)
    BARA submission to the Productivity Commission – Australia’s international tourism industry: trends, drivers and barriers to growth Overview of BARA The Board of Airline Representatives of Australia (BARA) is the industry body promoting the safe and efficient operations of international airlines serving Australia for the benefit of consumers, businesses and tourism. BARA’s members provide 90% of all international passenger flights to and from Australia. BARA’s role is to provide a collective voice on major issues that affect international aviation. The sustainable growth and potential of Australia’s international aviation industry depends on the right economic policy framework and legislative and regulatory arrangements. As a ‘hands on’ industry body, directly supporting its members’ operations, BARA takes a collaborative and practical approach to its work. BARA has authorisation from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to collectively negotiate on behalf of its members with international airports, Airservices Australia and other providers of essential aviation services. At an operational level, BARA engages with airport operators and border agencies to improve the experience, efficiency and safety outcomes for international passengers. BARA’s vision and outcomes To guide BARA’s work and clearly articulate its ideals, BARA’s members have developed a Vision and Outcomes for International Aviation in Australia, available at www.bara.org.au. The vision for international aviation in Australia is ‘High quality, adaptive and
    [Show full text]
  • THALES Automation System Main Features
    www.thalesgroup.com THALES Automation System main features Automation System and Integrated Telecommunications for Air Navigation Services/System-Wide Information Management (SWIM) Workshop EMX0074 CNS Mexico City, April 21-22, 2014 ICAO North American, Central American and Caribbean Regional Office 2 / Thales a global player Collective intelligence for a safer world Whenever critical decisions need to be made, Thales has a role to play. In all its markets — aerospace, space, ground transportation, defence and security — Thales solutions help customers to make the right decisions at the right time and act accordingly. World-class technology, the combined expertise of 65,000 employees and operations A balanced revenue structure in 56 countries have made Thales a key player in keeping the public safe and secure, guarding vital Defence Civil infrastructure and protecting the national security % 45% interests of countries around the globe. 55 Revenues in 2012 14.2 billion euros Shareholders (at 31 May 2013) 3 / Global leadership N1 worldwide Payloads Air Traffic Management Sonars Security for interbank for telecom satellites transactions N2 worldwide Rail signalling systems In-flight entertainment Military tactical and connectivity radiocommunications €14 billion in revenues N3 worldwide Avionics Civil satellites Surface radars 44 // Air Traffic Management Welcome to Thales ATM 5 / Thales Air Traffic Management Solutions Automation Communication Navigation Surveillance Conventional ATC Centres Aeronautical Radar Navaids ● TopSky - ATC Messaging
    [Show full text]
  • Safe and Efficient Air Navigation Services
    BARA Board of Airline Representatives of Australia Inc INTERNATIONAL AVIATION POLICY SERIES Safe and Efficient Air Navigation Services Page 1 Overview of BARA The Board of Airline Representatives of Australia (BARA) is the industry body promoting the safe and efficient operations of international airlines serving Australia for the benefit of consumers, businesses and tourism. BARA BARABoard isof a Air member-drivenline industry body that delivers value through setting key expectations and desiredRepresentati outcomesves for Australia’s aviation infrastructure and service providers. BARA’s members of Australia Inc include many of the world’s largest airlines, providing 90% of all international passenger flights, and carrying most exports and imports of freight to and from Australia. BARA’s Vision and Outcomes To guide BARA’s work and clearly articulate its ideals, BARA’s members have developed a Vision and Outcomes for International Aviation in Australia, available at www.bara.org.au. The vision for international aviation in Australia is ‘High quality, adaptive and efficient’. Underpinning this vision, BARA has identified four key outcomes to boost the competitiveness, productivity and financial performance of industry participants. These are: Outcome 1: Timely and reasonably priced airport infrastructure Outcome 2: Competitive supply of jet fuel Outcome 3: Safe and efficient air navigation services Outcome 4: Environmentally sustainable growth During 2014 BARA published its policy papers on the need for Timely and reasonably priced airport infrastructure and A competitive supply of jet fuel at Australia’s major international airports, available at BARA’s website. Safe and Efficient Air Navigation Services Air navigation services are critical to safe and efficient airline operations across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Registration Document
    www.thalesgroup.com 2014 Registration Document ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT WorldReginfo - c108f9bb-0ac3-48ef-aec5-568aafb789d5 Table of contents 11 Chairman & chief executive offi cer’s foreword 2 FINANCIAL INFORMATION 2014 7 Overview of the Group 3 1.1 Group management report 8 History 4 1.2 Consolidated fi nancial statements 29 Key data 5 1.3 Parent company management report and fi nancial statements 87 21 BUSINESS REVIEW 121 2.1 Operating segments 122 2.2 Research and innovation 131 2.3 Relations between Thales and its subsidiaries 134 2.4 Information about major operational subsidiaries and manufacturing sites 136 31 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 139 3.1 Members of the Board of directors at 31 December 2014 140 3.2 Chairman’s report to the General Meeting of 13 May 2015 on corporate governance, internal control and risk management 148 3.3 Statutory auditors’ report prepared in accordance with Article L.225-235 of the French Commercial Code (Code de commerce) on the report of the Chairman of the Board of directors of Thales 161 3.4 General management 162 3.5 Incentives and profi t-sharing 173 3.6 Statutory auditors 174 41 COMPANY AND SHARE CAPITAL 177 4.1 General information about the Company 178 4.2 General Meetings 179 4.3 Share capital and shareholders 180 4.4 Regulated commitments 193 4.5 Stock market information fi nancial communication 198 51 CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY 205 5.1 Social Information 206 5.2 Environmental information 220 5.3 Societal information 232 5.4 Statutory auditors’ independent third-party report on consolidated social, environmental and societal information published in the management report 239 5.5 Social, environmental and societal information 241 WorldReginfo - c108f9bb-0ac3-48ef-aec5-568aafb789d5 2014 Registration document Including the Annual Financial Report The registration document was filed with the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) on 1 April 2015 , in accordance with Article 212-13 of the AMF General Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Traffic Management Shaping Tomorrow’S Sky an Undisputed Innovation -And User- Oriented Environment Dedicated to Research and Experimentations
    www.thalesgroup.com FLIGHT INFORMATION REGIONS (FIRS) CONTROLLED BY THALES AUTOMATED PASSION FOR INNOVATION CONTROL SYSTEMS Air Traffic Management Shaping Tomorrow’s Sky An undisputed innovation -and user- oriented environment dedicated to research and experimentations AFR101 + Exploring new technologies through 4 Innovation Labs around the world: 094 220 NESSI 24 > France (SkyCentre, The Link by Thales) Australia (CASIA) and the US (NextGen Innovation Lab) > Capturing user’s needs to provide simple and reliable solutions QTR303 IWA A319 M > Ideal environment to evaluate new concepts developed 145 070 CELSO 37 DID YOU KNOW? 190 LWTM ahdg asp > Integrating Human Factors approach for continuous enhancement of our solutions DENIS2S 09 THIA 220 > Widest range of CNS and ATM solutions > 2 out of every 3 planes in the world take off and land safely thanks to Thales > Leading role in SESAR / key technology partner in US NextGen > ICAO ASBUs Block 0 & 1 compliant > 24/7 innovation with our 4 labs in Australia, France and the US - THALES - 02/15 - Technical characteristics are given for information and are subject to change without prior notice. - THALES 02/15 Technical > More than 60 Customers have already experienced the ATM Innovation Labs AFR201 WEST B744 H 310 - 310 KUMAR 53 310 KUMAR star rwy VABB 310 AUSTRALIA FRANCE GERMANY ITALY UNITED KINGDOM USA Thales Australia Limited Thales Air Systems SAS Thales Electronic Systems GmbH Thales Italia S.p.A. Thales ATM Limited Thales ATM The Thales Australia Centre 3, avenue Charles Lindbergh Thalesplatz 1 Via E. Mattei, No.1 Minerva building, Manor Royal 2733 South Crystal Drive WTC Northbank Wharf BP 20351 71254 Ditzingen 20064 Gorgonzola (MI) Crawley, West Sussex RH10 9HA Suite 1200 Melbourne, VIC 3005 94628 Rungis cedex Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • RASMAG/16−WP/09 20-24/02/2012 International Civil Aviation
    RASMAG/16−WP/09 20-24/02/2012 International Civil Aviation Organization The Sixteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/16) Bangkok, Thailand, 20 – 24 February 2012 Agenda Item 3: Reports from Asia/Pacific RMAs and EMAs SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF RVSM WITHIN THE FLIGHT INFORMATION REGIONS MONITORED BY THE AAMA (Presented by Australia) SUMMARY This paper presents the results of safety assessments undertaken by the Australian Airspace Monitoring Agency (AAMA) for the twelve month period ending 30 November 2011. The assessments cover the Brisbane, Honiara, Jakarta, Melbourne, Nauru, Port Moresby and Ujung Pandang FIRs. Additional risk values are provided for months post the November period. This paper relates to – Strategic Objectives: A: Safety – Enhance global civil aviation safety Global Plan Initiatives: GPI-2 Reduced vertical separation minima 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. This paper provides details of the two airspace safety oversight assessments undertaken by the AAMA for the RVSM implementations in the Australian, Nauru, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands RVSM airspace to end of November 2011 and for the Indonesian airspace to end of September 2011. No full report was completed for October or November 2011 for Indonesia. The reports are detailed in Attachments 1 and 2. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The reports show that for the Australian, Nauru and Solomon Islands airspace, the target level of safety (TLS) was met. For the Indonesian airspace, the risk continued to exceeded the target. No assessment was completed for the Papua New Guinea airspace in November. 2.2 Since the completion of the assessments provided with this paper, the AAMA has completed further assessments for the month of December 2011 and January 2012 for the Australian, Nauru, Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands airspace.
    [Show full text]